Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Medchemcomm. 2016 Feb 19;7(4):612–622. doi: 10.1039/C6MD00043F

Fatty Acid Transport Proteins: Targeting FATP2 as a Gatekeeper Involved in the Transport of Exogenous Fatty Acids

Paul N Black 1,2, Constance Ahowesso 1, David Montefusco 1, Nipun Saini 1, Concetta C DiRusso 1,2
PMCID: PMC4948302  NIHMSID: NIHMS766008  PMID: 27446528

Summary

The fatty acid transport proteins (FATP) are classified as members of the Solute Carrier 27 (Slc27) family of proteins based on their ability to function in the transport of exogenous fatty acids. These proteins, when localized to the plasma membrane or at intracellular membrane junctions with the endoplasmic reticulum, function as a gate in the regulated transport of fatty acids and thus represent a therapeutic target to delimit the acquisition of fatty acids that contribute to disease as in the case of fatty acid overload. To date, FATP1, FATP2, and FATP4 have been used as targets in the selection of small molecule inhibitors with the goal of treating insulin resistance and attenuating dietary absorption of fatty acids. Several studies targeting FATP1 and FATP4 were based on the intrinsic acyl CoA synthetase activity of these proteins and not on transport directly. While several classes of compounds were identified as potential inhibitors of fatty acid transport, in vivo studies using a mouse model failed to provide evidence these compounds were effective in blocking or attenuating fatty acid transport. Studies targeting FATP2 employed a naturally occurring splice variant, FATP2b, which lacks intrinsic acyl CoA synthetase due to the deletion of exon 3, yet is fully functional in fatty acid transport. These studies identified two compounds, 5′-bromo-5-phenyl-spiro[3H-1,3,4-thiadiazole-2,3′-indoline]-2′-one), now referred to as Lipofermata, and 2-benzyl-3-(4-chlorophenyl)-5-(4-nitrophenyl)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-7(4H)-one, now called Grassofermata, that are effective fatty acid transport inhibitors both in vitro using a series of model cell lines and in vivo using a mouse model.

Graphical Abstract

FATP2 as the gatekeeper (A), dysregulation of fatty acid metabolism from FA overload (B), and Lipofermata or Grassofermata treatment (C).

graphic file with name nihms766008u1.jpg

Fatty Acids and Lipotoxic Disease

The obesity epidemic is fueled by intake of calorie dense foods in excess of that needed for growth and development and to maintain health. Among the nutritional components correlated with increased disease risk are fats, particularly saturated and trans-unsaturated fatty acids. Few drugs are currently available to treat obesity, which is now classified as a disease affecting 34.9 percent of adults and 16.9 percent of children and adolescents 1. Of these, most drugs generally seek to suppress appetite or decrease fat digestion to limit absorption in the intestine 26. A member of the first class is phenteramine, which is also accompanied by adverse cardiovascular events 79. Orlistat is a member of the second class of drugs 10, 11. This drug acts to inhibit pancreatic lipase and is associated with gastrointestinal disturbances. In addition, the use of orlistat for one year only results in modest weight reduction. Given the health imperative and economic burden of the obesity epidemic and the lack of treatment options, alternative methods must be found to decrease the prevalence of obesity, limit the toxic effects of fatty acids, or interrupt the molecular mechanisms that link excessive accumulation in fatty acids to debilitating diseases.

Chronic imbalances in lipid flux and metabolism often cause a variety of metabolic abnormalities and pathologies, including hyperlipidemia, type two diabetes (T2D), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), cardiovascular disease (CVD), and some cancers 1214. A name given to the cellular dysfunction caused by high levels of intracellular fatty acids is lipotoxicity 1521. For most tissues, the excess fatty acids are derived from an extracellular source (i.e., diet) when blood levels of triglycerides and free fatty acids are chronically elevated. However, de novo synthesis in liver of fatty acids and triglycerides can also add to the burden of systemic lipid overload when dietary carbohydrate is consumed chronically at levels above the amount required to meet daily energy demands. Apart from adipocytes, most cells have a limited capacity for lipid storage and when this capacity is exceeded, cell death may result from lipotoxicity characterized by ER stress, mitochondrial and nuclear dysfunction 19, 22, 23. Obesity is a common initiating condition for these diseases due to chronic hyperlipidemia and elevated free fatty acids. Current evidence indicates free fatty acids and/or their metabolites mediate cell death, although the exact mechanism is poorly understood 22, 2426. Lipid overload in muscle can lead to insulin resistance and in pancreatic β-cells may lead to dysregulation of insulin secretion and apoptotic cell death, both of which may contribute to the genesis of the diabetic state 2729. Lipoapoptosis is also observed in the heart, which leads to the development of heart failure 3032. In liver, chronically elevated fat deposits result in NAFLD, which can lead to steatohepatitis (NASH) and, eventually, to non-reversible hepatic cirrhosis 25, 33. Therefore, there is much interest in preventing abnormal lipid accumulation, which can lead to lipotoxicity, metabolic dysfunction, and disease. Given the role of free fatty acids in lipotoxicity, one target to prevent or resolve lipotoxic disease is fatty acid uptake into cells.

The development of drugs to prevent lipotoxic disease requires the determination components and mechanisms that contribute to and regulate normal lipid homeostasis, particularly with regard to fatty acid metabolism. Our mechanistic work has focused on the role of the Slc27a family of proteins also known as Fatty Acid Transport Proteins (FATP) 3440. To date six family members have been identified in humans, FATP1-6 (i.e., Slc27a1 through Slc27a6) 41. Among these, we have focused our efforts on FATP2 because of its role in fatty acid transport and trafficking, especially in liver and intestine where it is highly expressed. Expression of FATP2 in liver is consistent with a primary role in fatty acid transport and metabolism; when its expression is increased there is a correlative increase in the progression of NAFLD 42. Recently, FATP2 was identified as a molecular marker for obesity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells 43 and was elevated in livers of adolescents with NASH 44. Decreased expression of FATP2 in liver using shRNA reduces fatty acid transport and protects mice from diet-induced NAFLD 45. There is evidence the winged helix/forkhead box (Fox) transcription factor Foxa1 is required for repression of FATP2; the expression of Foxa1 results in decreased FATP2 levels and reduced fatty acid uptake in hepatocytes 46. In this regard Foxa1 expression may function, in part, to protect liver from steatosis through the regulation of FATP2. In primary rat hepatocytes the development of lipotoxicity by palmitate is correlated with increased expression of plasma membrane localized FATP2 and the development of insulin resistance 47. This increased expression of FATP2 in liver is also associated with activation of the insulin receptor substrates IRS-1 and IRS-2 coincident with lipogenesis. The increased levels of FATP2, mediated by IRS signaling, seem likely to contribute to increased hepatic lipid accumulation and secretion into circulation 48. Given that exogenous fatty acids directly contribute to NAFLD 49, 50, these finding are of particular importance to inform work directed at preventing lipotoxicity in susceptible tissues.

Fatty Acid Transport Through Vectorial acylation

Like glucose transport that is coupled to phosphorylation, one mechanism that drives fatty acid transport into cells is coupled to esterification with coenzyme A (vectorial acylation) 35. This hypothesis of vectorial acylation, concomitant fatty acid transport and activation was put forth by Overath and co-workers in 1969 and arose from their studies in E. coli 51. This seminal work demonstrated that a long chain acyl CoA synthetase (Acsl) is required to target the fatty acids for metabolism in E coli. Importantly, these studies demonstrated that free fatty acids did not accumulate in cells where fatty acids were provided as the sole carbon and energy source, but rather acyl CoA derivatives were detected. E coli cells lacking the structural gene encoding the Acsl, fadD, are unable to transport exogenous fatty acids further supporting this concept. Mechanistically, it is thought the bacterial Acsl partitions into the inner membrane in response to exogenous long chain fatty acids where this enzyme abstracts the fatty acid substrate concomitant with catalysis to produce fatty acyl CoA 5255. The resultant acyl-CoA is the ligand of the transcription factor FadR. The FadR-acyl-CoA complex cannot bind DNA, thus inducing the expression of genes encoding fatty acid degrading enzymes and the fatty acid transporter FadL, while also reducing the expression of genes encoding tow genes required for unsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis. This foundational work in bacteria describing the process of vectorial acylation, the generation of long chain acyl CoA and transcriptional regulatory network has established the basis for addressing this process in eukaryotic systems 54.

In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the process of vectorial acylation is operational, but with increased complexity. The yeast Fat1 protein (Fat1p; YBR041W) was identified by structural and functional similarities to members of the FATP family 56. Deletion of the yeast FAT1 gene, encoding Fat1p, disrupts fatty acid transport measured using both radioactive substrates and the fluorescent fatty acid analogue, C1-BODIPY-C12 56. The reduction in fatty acid transport in fat1Δ strains is also associated with inability of yeast cells to grow under conditions where cells are auxotrophic for long chain fatty acids such as during hypoxia when the fatty acyl CoA Δ9 desaturase (Ole1p) is inactive. Fat1p-dependent fatty acid uptake is specific for long chain fatty acids (C16-C20).

Like several mammalian FATPs, Fat1p is a dual functional protein with acyl CoA synthetase activity specific for very long chain fatty acids (>C20; Vlacs). Deletion of FAT1 reduces activation of lignoceric acid (C24:0) and results in the accumulation of very long chain fatty acids 52, 57, 58. Importantly, alanine scanning mutagenesis of the yeast FAT1 generated altered forms of Fat1p that have activities that separate fatty acid transport from fatty acid activation 59. Three additional lines of evidence further support the conclusion the transport and activation activities in different members of the FATP protein family distinct. First, the expression of FATP1, 2 and 4 in yeast results in increased Vlacs (i.e., C24:0 or C20:4) activity but has no affect on Acsl activity using long chain fatty acid substrates (i.e., C14:0 or C18:1) 60. FATP 5 and 6 do not function in this capacity, nor do they complement transport deficiencies in yeast fat1Δ strains. Second, the characterization of five different murine FATP1, 4, and 6 protein chimeras distinguished fatty acid transport and activation 36. And third, two splice variants of human FATP2 (2a and 2b) are expressed in various tissues 35, 37, 59, 61. Variant 2b is missing exon 3 encoding the ATP/AMP binding site and functions in fatty acid transport but not fatty acid activation 38. The fundamentals of vectorial acylation in yeast and mammals are shown in Figure 1 where the formation of acyl CoA drives transport. While there is evidence that in the case for FATP4, it may function alone to drive this process 62, the genetic data and the identification of a catalytically deficient form of FATP2 detailed above supports the proposal that a cognate acyl CoA synthetase must function in concert in concert with an FATP to drive this process.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Vectorial acylation. A. FATP and Acsl function as a complex at the plasma membrane (PM) to drive the coupled transport and activation of long chain fatty acids. B. FATP and Acsl form a complex in a region of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) that is associated with the plasma membrane to drive the coupled transport and activation of long chain fatty acids.

FATP/Scl27 Family Members as Drug Targets

As summarized above, the fatty acid transport proteins (FATP) are classified as members of the Solute Carrier 27 (Slc27) family of proteins 35, 41, 63, 64 and have been evaluated for their ability to promote the transport of exogenous fatty acids in a number of different cell types 3436, 41, 47, 56, 59, 60, 6280. The first fatty acid transport protein, FATP1, as well as Acsl1 was identified using expression cloning from a cDNA library prepared from murine 3T3-L1 adipocytes directly demonstrating its physiological role in the net accumulation of fatty acids 80. A number of different isoforms of FATP have subsequently been identified experimentally in mice, rats, humans, C. elegans, Drosophila and yeast 56, 58, 62, 63, 67, 68, 78, 8082. In mammals there are six isoforms that differ based on their tissue and cell type distribution, regulation and preferred substrate 73. While the expression of each of these proteins has been correlated with increased levels of fatty acid transport, several have also been described as very long chain acyl CoA synthetases (Vlacs). Indeed prior to the classification of this family of proteins as members of the Slc27 family, several were first described as very long chain acyl CoA synthetases, and based on their sequence encoding an ATP binding domain clearly fall into the larger family of adenylate-forming enzymes 45, 71, 8291. One member of this family, FATP4, plays a major role in vivo in maintaining the barrier function of the skin through ceramide metabolism and contributes to the epidermal barrier function 64, 70. Another, FATP5, has activation activity towards bile acids and is involved in secondary bile acid metabolism 92, 93. Finally, there is evidence these proteins are localized to the endoplasmic reticulum in addition to the plasma membrane, which may occur at regions of juxtaposition between the two membranes (e.g., see 94, 95). None-the-less, both knockdown and over expression studies of several members of the FATP family are consistent with the conclusion they function in the process governing the transport exogenous fatty acids into the cell in a highly regulated manner.

Given their important roles in fatty acid transport, the FATP proteins are viewed as viable targets to prevent aberrant accumulation of fat in cells and tissues that leads to lipotoxic disease. FATP1 and FATP4 have been used to select inhibitors by high through put screening 96, 97. In each screen, acyl CoA synthetase activity was targeted and not fatty acid transport directly. It was rationalized that the Acsl activity was essential for transport activity due to coupled activation and transport. However, from our work in yeast, the activation and transport activities are separable 36, 59, 61. FATP1 was particularly chosen as a therapeutic target for the treatment of insulin resistance and various arylpiperazines were selected as inhibitors 96. However, upon testing in mice, the selected compound imidazolepyridine, did not limit the accumulation of triglyceride in muscle when mice were fed a high fat diet leading to the conclusion that inhibition of FATP1 alone is insufficient to block fatty acid transport 96. FATP4 was originally described as the major FATP in the intestine and the rationale for its selection as a therapeutic target was to block the absorption of dietary fatty acids 97. In this case screening studies identified dihydropyrimidinones as FATP4-specific inhibitors. Again, in subsequent in vivo studies these compounds were ineffective as inhibitors of fatty acid absorption. These results informed our choice to focus on FATP2 and to limit our screening design to fatty acid transport rather than Acsl activity.

Fatty Acid Transport Protein 2 (FATP2)

Recent work in our laboratories has focused on FATP2 (Slc27a2), which is expressed in specific tissue types, particularly the small intestine, pancreas and liver 38. FATP2 was originally defined as a very long chain acyl CoA synthetase (Acsvl1) with an indirect role in the pathophysiology of X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD) 86, 87, 98. The FATP2/Acsvl1 knockout mouse (fatp2−/−) has reduced very long chain acyl CoA synthetase (VLACS) and peroxisomal very long chain FA oxidation activities in liver, but does not accumulate very long chain fatty acids in blood, a hallmark of X-ALD. The role of FATP2 in fatty acid transport was subsequently demonstrated in both yeast and mammalian cells 37, 38, 45, 60. Of particular importance was the identification of a splice variant of FATP2 (FATP2b) that lacks acyl CoA synthetase activity yet is fully functional in fatty acid transport demonstrating the transport activity is distinct from fatty acid activation 38.

FATP2 is highly expressed in small intestine, liver, kidney, pancreas and placenta and to a lesser extent in brain, heart, and colon; expression is not detectable in white adipose tissue 38 (see http://www.proteinatlas.org/). FATP2 expression in the small intestinal mucosa has been confirmed and moreover shown to significantly increase in mice fed a high fat diet 99, 100. FATP2 is the predominant FATP isoform expressed in Caco-2 cells, a human epithelial colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line 40. Expression of FATP2 in liver is also consistent with a key role in fatty acid transport and metabolism. In primary rat hepatocytes, the development of lipotoxicity by palmitate (C16:0) is correlated with increased FATP2 expression, plasma membrane localization, and the development of insulin resistance 47. Increased expression is linked with the progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) 42 while decreased expression using adenoviral-directed fatp2 shRNA reduces fatty acid transport and protects mice from diet-induced NAFLD 45. FATP2 levels increase in isolated human pancreatic islets under high glucose conditions supporting a mechanistic basis of this protein in fatty acid transport in β cells 101. FATP2 is the predominant isoform in INS-1E cells, a rat pancreatic β cell line 102.

The regulation of FATP2 expression is complex. In the small intestine, FATP2 expression levels are increased four- to five-fold in response to the PPARα and GW7647 103. In PPARα null mice, the expression of FATP2 is decreased two-fold; the expression of FATP2 remains unchanged in PPARα null mice treated with both agonists 103. There is evidence the winged helix/forkhead box (Fox) transcription factor Foxa1 regulates the expression of FATP2 in liver. As noted above, the increased expression of Foxa1 in HepG2 cells and primary human hepatocytes decreases FATP2 expression, which is correlated with approximately two-fold lower levels of fatty acid transport 46. In this regard Foxa1 expression appears to function, in part, to protect liver from steatosis through the regulation of FATP2. The increased expression of FATP2 in liver is also associated with activation of insulin the insulin receptor substrates IRS-1 and IRS-2, which is coincident with increased lipogenesis. Given that exogenous fatty acids directly contribute to NAFLD, we suggest FATP2 is a key determinant in the development of a chronic fatty liver 49, 50, 104, 105. Finally, and of specific interest in the context of obesity, FATP2 expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of rats fed a hyperlipidemic cafeteria diet was 33-fold higher than rats fed a lower fat normal caloric diet, suggesting this protein may be an ideal marker for overweight development and lipotoxicity 43. With this information as a backdrop, the challenge at present is to target FATP2 to prevent and resolve lipotoxicity using novel small compound inhibitors to prevent associated pathologies.

Collectively, FATP2 is an attractive target to develop inhibitors that block fatty acid transport for several reasons. First, expression of FATP2 is specific to a limited number of tissues, but is highly expressed in intestine and liver 41. Thus, inhibition is predicted to affect absorption, distribution, and over-accumulation of fatty acids in liver. Second, studies in animals and cells, as well as in human clinical studies, indicate depression of FATP2 levels in the liver is associated with decreased fatty acid uptake and is protective for NAFLD. FATP2 has been suggested as a biomarker for the development of overweight and obesity 43, 44, 46. Third, a complete germline deletion of FATP2 in mice did not affect development, growth, or normal functions 98, while liver-targeted gene expression knock down was protective of development of fatty liver induced by high fat diet 45. Thus, FATP2 fulfills most of the requirements for a good drug target 106: [1] Limited tissue expression and good specificity, [2] Demonstrated target for NAFLD in animals, [3] Long-term inhibition should not affect most normal physiological functions predicting limited side effects and good tolerability, [4] High throughput screening directed against the catalytically deficient form has yielded five candidate compounds and structural families 39, and [5] In vitro and cell-based assays demonstrate the selected FATP2 inhibitors have limited impact on cell viability and provided good protection from palmitate-induced cellular dysfunction and death 102.

Development of High Throughput Screens to Identify Compounds that Block FATP2

To address this challenge and further understand the role of the FATP2 in fatty acid transport, activation and intracellular trafficking, we devised a screening method for small compound inhibitors that relied on the transport of the fluorescent long chain fatty acid C1-BODIPY-C12 107, 108. The primary screening method employed a yeast strain deficient in fatty acid transport (fat1Δ) and with reduced Acsl activity (faa1Δ). In this strain we expressed human FATP2b, which functions in fatty acid transport but is deficient in acyl CoA synthetase activity 107, 108. The selected transport inhibitors are useful as [1] chemical probes to understand the biochemical mechanisms that govern fatty acid transport into cells, and [2] novel compounds of therapeutic value to treat pathological states resulting from, or exacerbated by, fatty acid accumulation in non-adipose tissue. Hits identified were scrutinized secondarily to eliminate those that were not specific to fatty acid transport but caused cellular toxicity, permeability, or because the compound acted as a fluorescence quenching agent toward the fluorescent fatty acid analogue C1-BODIPY-C12 used in the screening process 39. The final hit list contained 90 compounds that were categorized to five structural families. For each family, representatives that passed secondary screens were further characterized in two mammalian cell lines: Caco2 cells, a model for intestinal epithelia, and HepG2 cells, a model for hepatocytes. Dose response curves were employed to measure an apparent IC50 for fatty acid uptake selecting only those in the low micromolar range. The hit compounds were further tested in these cells and were shown to significantly depress long chain fatty acid transport using [14C]-oleate (C18:1cisΔ9), while not affecting the transport of glucose. None of the selected compounds disrupted membrane barrier function tested measuring trans-epithelial electrical resistance (TEER) of the Caco2 cell line or decreased total Acsl activity. The most effective member of each family (lowest IC50 in Caco2 and HepG2 cells) was then evaluated in 3T3L1 adipocytes 39. In fat cells, the selected compounds had a relatively high IC50. The rationale was that prevention of absorption across the intestine and accumulation of fatty acid in adipocytes would be preventive of lipotoxicity, while accumulation of fatty acid in adipocytes is viewed as protective and, therefore, should be preserved in any therapeutic approach to prevention and management of lipotoxic disease. Among the final hit list, two, CB16.2 called Lipofemata and CB5 called Grassofermata, were selected as lead hits since they had the best profiles for features indicative of a high affinity and specificity with low toxicity in all our screening assays (DiRusso, C.C. and Black, P.N., 2013, Patent US8431582 B2, Inhibitors of fatty acid uptake and methods of use covers Grassofermata US8263640 B2, covers Lipofermata) 107 (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Lipofermata and Grassofermata. A. Chemical structure of Lipofermata (CB16.2); B. Dose response curve of Lipofermata blocking the transport of the fluorescent fatty acids C1-BODIPY-C12 in HepG2 cells; C. Chemical structure of Grassofermata (CB5); D. Dose response curve of Grassofermata blocking the transport of the fluorescent fatty acids C1-BODIPY-C12 in HepG2 cells.

Lipofermata

The best-characterized inhibitor to date is Lipofermata, 5′-bromo-5-phenyl-spiro[3H-1,3,4-thiadiazole-2,3′-indoline]-2′-one), which specifically attenuates FATP2-mediated fatty acid transport without impacting other cellular functions, including long chain acyl CoA synthetase activity 39, 102. Lipofermata is highly effective in attenuating fatty acid transport and importantly prevents lipid accumulation in cells that are models for hepatocytes (HepG2), enterocytes (Caco-2), myocytes (C2C12) and pancreatic β cells (INS-1E) 102. This compound is 10- to 50-fold less effective in inhibiting fatty acid transport in 3T3L1 adipocytes and human adipocytes, the preferred lipid storage site.

Lipofermata inhibits the transport of the fluorescent fatty acid analogues C1-BODIPY-C12 and BODIPY-FL-C16 through a non-competitive process with IC50s in the low micromolar demonstrating its utility in blocking the transport of long and very long chain fatty acids, respectively 102. These data are consistent with studies using FATP2 overexpressing and knockdown cell lines treated with isotopically labeled exogenous fatty acids, which demonstrated this protein contributes to fatty acid transport through vectorial acylation 37, 38.

The saturated fatty acid, palmitate, is a major component of the western diet and high levels of dietary intake correlate with a number of life style diseases including Type 2 diabetes and NAFLD 30, 109, 110. Palmitic acid induces apoptosis in pancreatic β-cell lines as well as in hepatocytes 111, 112. Lipofermata treatment blocks both palmitate-induced accumulation of lipid droplets and apoptotic cell death in a dose-dependent manner102. Chronic exposure of both liver and β cells to high levels of saturated fatty acids has been shown to induce apoptosis and disrupt cellular function thereby contributing to the pathogenesis of fatty liver disease (modeled in Figure 3) 25, 33, 113 and type 2 diabetes 114. Lipofermata at relatively low concentrations (5–50 μM) promotes survival of HepG2 and INS-1E cells and protects against palmitic acid-induced lipotoxicity measured by evaluating ROS, GSH, BiP, CHOP and caspase-3 levels) 102. On the basis of these findings, we propose Lipofermata is likely to be useful to attenuate cellular and organ lipotoxicity, which leads to disease and may be of therapeutic use in protecting β cells against lipotoxicity caused by diets high in saturated fat.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Role of FATP2 in fatty acid transport and homeostasis. A. Normal fatty acid transport in hepatocytes coupled with cellular homeostasis at the levels of fatty acid oxidation, lipid synthesis and transcriptional regulation. B. Increased fatty acid transport and lipid overload as associated cellular dysfunction, noted in red, and associated with mitochondrial dysfunction (increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lost of cytochrome C); ER stress (reflected by increased levels of ROS and BiP); increased peroxisomal fatty acid oxidation and associated oxidative stress; dysregulation of transcription (associated with activation of CHOP; an increase in apoptotic proteins and loss of nuclear membrane integrity); all of which contribute to the activation of the caspase cascade leading to apoptosis. As detailed in the text, treatment of cells under conditions of fatty acid overload with either Lipofermata or Grassofermata attenuate or eliminate the cellular dysfunctions noted in B.

One of the predicted uses of Lipofermata is as an inhibitor of intestinal fatty acid absorption for use in mechanistic studies in animals and, perhaps eventually, as a therapeutic. Lipofermata attenuates fatty acid absorption across the gut by 80% in a temporal manner 102. There are no other compounds that inhibit fatty acid absorption specifically targeting fatty acid transport. Xenical (orlistat) is an approved drug for use in inhibiting fat absorption 11 that function by inhibiting pancreatic lipase and thus triglyceride breakdown 115. In this case, since the fatty acids are not released from the complex lipid, they cannot be absorbed. It is worth speculating that Lipofermata may be used as a partner with Xenical, which will further inhibit free fatty acid transport across the intestinal epithelium. As reviewed above, selected FATP1 and FATP4 inhibitors do not prevent fatty acid absorption 96, 97.

Grassofermata

A second FATP2-inhibitor identified in our high throughput screen is Grassofermata, 2-benzyl-3-(4-chlorophenyl)-5-(4-nitrophenyl)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-7(4H)-one39. Like Lipofermata, Grassofermata is inhibits the transport of fluorescent fatty acid-analog C1-BODIPY-C12 in various cell lines that are models for small intestine, liver, pancreatic islets, muscles and human adipocytes 102. Inhibition by Grassofermata is specific for long and very long chain fatty acid transport and is protective effects against palmitic acid induced lipoapoptosis 39, 116, 117. As predicted, treatment of cells with this compound does not alter medium chain fatty acid transport. Consistent with in vitro studies, Grassofermata, like Lipofermata when delivered orally, prevents intestinal absorption of 13C labeled oleate 117. Pharmacokinetic data show this inhibitor is detectible in the blood within 30 minutes of dosing and for up to 6 hours indicating it is absorbed as well 117. Like Lipofermata, Grassofermata is a specific FATP2 fatty acid transport inhibitor that has valuable potential to add to our arsenal of pharmaceuticals to prevent and treat lipotoxic disease.

Prospective

Exogenous long-chain fatty acids contribute to normal metabolic homeostasis that includes energy production, complex lipid synthesis for membranes and storage, and protein anchoring. Under normal conditions, excess fatty acids are esterified and stored as triglycerides in adipocyte stores that are dynamically responsive to systemic energy needs. Apart from adipocytes, most cells have a limited capacity for lipid storage and when this capacity is exceeded, as in the case of fatty acid overload, cell death may result from a process called lipotoxicity 17, 19, 113, 118122. The identification of Lipofermata (5′-bromo-5-phenyl-spiro[3H-1,3,4-thiadiazole-2,3′-indoline]-2′-one)) and Grassofermata (2-benzyl-3-(4-chlorophenyl)-5-(4-nitrophenyl)pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-7(4H)-one), as effective FATP2 fatty acid transport inhibitors, represents a key advance in targeting FATP2/Slc27a2 fatty acid transport protein to combat diseases associated with lipid overload.

Supplementary Material

Bios

Acknowledgments

The work in the C. C. DiRusso and P. N. Black laboratories was supported by grants from National Institutes of Health (DK071076 and GM056840) and the Agricultural Research Division of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Abbreviations

Acsl

long chain acyl CoA synthetase

BiP

binding immunoglobulin protein (glucose regulated protein 78 (Grp78))

C1-BODIPY-C12

4,4-difluoro-5,7-dimethyl-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene-3-dodecanoic acid

CHOP

ISR-regulated transcription factor

CVD

cardiovascular disease

ER

endoplasmic reticulum

FadR

Escherichia coli long chain acyl CoA-responsive transcription factor

FAT1

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Fat1p structural gene

Fat1p

Saccharomyces cerevisiae FATP orthologue

FATP

fatty acid transport protein

GSH

glutathione

Fox

winged helix/forkhead box

IRS

insulin receptor substrate NASH – nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

NAFLD

nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Ole1p

Saccharomyces cerevisiae fatty acyl CoA Δ9 desaturase

PPAR

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor

ROS

reactive oxygen species

Slc27

solute carrier family 27

T2D

Type 2 Diabetes

TEER

trans-epithelial electrical resistance

Vlacs

very long chain acyl CoA synthetase

X-ALD

X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing interests.

Referenced Cited

  • 1.Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. JAMA. 2014;311:806–814. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gadde KM. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014 doi: 10.1517/14656566.2014.890590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.George M, Rajaram M, Shanmugam E. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2014;19:65–76. doi: 10.1177/1074248413501017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kennedy MJ, Jellerson KD, Snow MZ, Zacchetti ML. Paediatric drugs. 2013;15:335–342. doi: 10.1007/s40272-013-0028-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kim GW, Lin JE, Blomain ES, Waldman SA. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;95:53–66. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2013.204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rueda-Clausen CF, Padwal RS, Sharma AM. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2013;9:467–478. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2013.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chaput JP, Berube-Parent S, Tremblay A. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2005;3:185–193. doi: 10.2174/1570161053586886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bray GA, Ryan DH. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 doi: 10.1111/nyas.12328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Surapaneni P, Vinales KL, Najib MQ, Chaliki HP. Tex Heart Inst J. 2011;38:581–583. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yarnell S, Oscar-Berman M, Avena N, Blum K, Gold M. J Genet Synd Gene Ther. 2013;4:131. doi: 10.4172/2157-7412.1000131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Boulghassoul-Pietrzykowska N, Franceschelli J, Still C. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2013;20:407–411. doi: 10.1097/01.med.0000433059.78485.fa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Garbarino J, Sturley SL. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2009;12:110–116. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e32832182ee. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Murdolo G, Bartolini D, Tortoioli C, Piroddi M, Iuliano L, Galli F. Free Radic Biol Med. 2013;65:811–820. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Unger RH, Clark GO, Scherer PE, Orci L. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1801:209–214. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Giacca A, Xiao C, Oprescu AI, Carpentier AC, Lewis GF. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2011;300:E255–262. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00416.2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ibrahim SH, Kohli R, Gores GJ. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011;53:131–140. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31822578db. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lelliott C, Vidal-Puig AJ. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28(Suppl 4):S22–28. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Malhi H, Gores GJ. Semin Liver Dis. 2008;28:360–369. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1091980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schaffer JE. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2003;14:281–287. doi: 10.1097/00041433-200306000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.van Raalte DH, Diamant M. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;93(Suppl 1):S37–46. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8227(11)70012-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zambo V, Simon-Szabo L, Szelenyi P, Kereszturi E, Banhegyi G, Csala M. World J Hepatol. 2013;5:550–557. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v5.i10.550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Unger RH. Diabetes. 1995;44:863–870. doi: 10.2337/diab.44.8.863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Unger RH, Scherer PE. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2010;21:345–352. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2010.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Djousse L, Benkeser D, Arnold A, Kizer JR, Zieman SJ, Lemaitre RN, Tracy RP, Gottdiener JS, Mozaffarian D, Siscovick DS, Mukamal KJ, Ix JH. Circ Heart Fail. 2013;6:964–969. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Leamy AK, Egnatchik RA, Young JD. Progress Lipid Res. 2013;52:165–174. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2012.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lee JY, Cho HK, Kwon YH. Metabolism. 2010;59:927–934. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2009.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Boden G. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2002;5:545–549. doi: 10.1097/00075197-200209000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lee Y, Hirose H, Ohneda M, Johnson JH, McGarry JD, Unger RH. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:10878–10882. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.23.10878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Unger RH, Zhou YT. Diabetes. 2001;50(Suppl 1):S118–121. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.2007.s118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Drosatos K, Schulze PC. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2013;10:109–121. doi: 10.1007/s11897-013-0133-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wu L, Zhou L, Lu Y, Zhang J, Jian F, Liu Y, Li F, Li W, Wang X, Li G. Biochim BiophysAacta. 2012;1822:1815–1825. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chiu HC, Kovacs A, Ford DA, Hsu FF, Garcia R, Herrero P, Saffitz JE, Schaffer JE. J Clin Invest. 2001;107:813–822. doi: 10.1172/JCI10947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Schuppan D, Schattenberg JM. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28(Suppl 1):68–76. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Arias-Barrau E, Dirusso CC, Black PN. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;580:233–249. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-325-1_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Black PN, DiRusso CC. Novartis Found Symp. 2007;286:127–138. doi: 10.1002/9780470985571.ch11. discussion 138–141, 162–123, 196–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.DiRusso CC, Darwis D, Obermeyer T, Black PN. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1781:135–143. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2008.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Melton EM, Cerny RL, DiRusso CC, Black PN. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;440:743–748. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.09.137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Melton EM, Cerny RL, Watkins PA, DiRusso CC, Black PN. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:30670–30679. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.226316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sandoval A, Chokshi A, Jesch ED, Black PN, Dirusso CC. Biochem Pharmacol. 2010;79:990–999. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2009.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sandoval A, Fraisl P, Arias-Barrau E, Dirusso CC, Singer D, Sealls W, Black PN. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2008;477:363–371. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2008.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kazantzis M, Stahl A. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1821:852–857. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2011.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Krammer J, Digel M, Ehehalt F, Stremmel W, Fullekrug J, Ehehalt R. Int J Med Sci. 2011;8:599–614. doi: 10.7150/ijms.8.599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Caimari A, Oliver P, Rodenburg W, Keijer J, Palou A. Int J Obes (Lond) 2010;34:831–839. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2010.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhu L, Baker SS, Liu W, Tao MH, Patel R, Nowak NJ, Baker RD. Metab Clin Exp. 2011;60:1001–1011. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2010.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Falcon A, Doege H, Fluitt A, Tsang B, Watson N, Kay MA, Stahl A. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2010;299:E384–393. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00226.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Moya M, Benet M, Guzman C, Tolosa L, Garcia-Monzon C, Pareja E, Castell JV, Jover R. PloS one. 2012;7:e30014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chabowski A, Zendzian-Piotrowska M, Konstantynowicz K, Pankiewicz W, Miklosz A, Lukaszuk B, Gorski J. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2013;207:346–357. doi: 10.1111/apha.12022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Softic S, Kirby M, Berger NG, Shroyer NF, Woods SC, Kohli R. PloS one. 2012;7:e38952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lambert JE, Parks EJ. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1821:721–726. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2012.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Donnelly KL, Smith CI, Schwarzenberg SJ, Jessurun J, Boldt MD, Parks EJ. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:1343–1351. doi: 10.1172/JCI23621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Overath P, Pauli G, Schairer HU. Eur J Biochem. 1969;7:559–574. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Black PN, DiRusso CC, Sherin D, MacColl R, Knudsen J, Weimar JD. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:38547–38553. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006413200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Black PN, Zhang Q, Weimar JD, DiRusso CC. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:4896–4903. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.8.4896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.DiRusso CC, Black PN. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:49563–49566. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R400026200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Weimar JD, DiRusso CC, Delio R, Black PN. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:29369–29376. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M107022200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Faergeman NJ, DiRusso CC, Elberger A, Knudsen J, Black PN. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:8531–8538. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.13.8531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Choi JY, Martin CE. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:4671–4683. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.8.4671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Watkins PA, Lu JF, Steinberg SJ, Gould SJ, Smith KD, Braiterman LT. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:18210–18219. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.29.18210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zou Z, DiRusso CC, Ctrnacta V, Black PN. J Biol Chem. 277:31062–31071. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M205034200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.DiRusso CC, Li H, Darwis D, Watkins PA, Berger J, Black PN. J Biol Chem,y. 2005;280:16829–16837. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409598200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Obermeyer T, Fraisl P, DiRusso CC, Black PN. J Lipid Res. 2007;48:2354–2364. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M700300-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Milger K, Herrmann T, Becker C, Gotthardt D, Zickwolf J, Ehehalt R, Watkins PA, Stremmel W, Fullekrug J. J Cell Sci. 2006;119:4678–4688. doi: 10.1242/jcs.03280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Anderson CM, Shahl A. Mol Aspects Med. 2013:516–528. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2012.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Gimeno RE. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2007;18:271–276. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0b013e3281338558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Black PN, DiRusso CC. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2003;67:454–472. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.67.3.454-472.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Bonen A, Chabowski A, Luiken JJ, Glatz JF. Physiology (Bethesda) 2007;22:15–29. doi: 10.1152/physiologyonline.2007.22.1.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bonen A, Miskovic D, Kiens B. Can J Appl Physiol. 1999;24:515–523. doi: 10.1139/h99-033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Dirusso CC, Connell EJ, Faergeman NJ, Knudsen J, Hansen JK, Black PN. Eur J Biochem. 2000;267:4422–4433. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01489.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Fisher RM, Gertow K. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2005;16:173–178. doi: 10.1097/01.mol.0000162322.39548.b1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Herrmann T, Buchkremer F, Gosch I, Hall AM, Bernlohr DA, Stremmel W. Gene. 2001;270:31–40. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(01)00489-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Jia Z, Moulson CL, Pei Z, Miner JH, Watkins PA. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:20573–20583. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M700568200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Mitchell RW, Hatch GM. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2011;85:293–302. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2011.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Stahl A. Pflugers Arch. 2004;447:722–727. doi: 10.1007/s00424-003-1106-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Stahl A, Evans JG, Pattel S, Hirsch D, Lodish HF. Dev Cell. 2002;2:477–488. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00143-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Wiczer BM, Bernlohr DA. J Lipid Res. 2009;50:2502–2513. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M900218-JLR200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Wu Q, Kazantzis M, Doege H, Ortegon AM, Tsang B, Falcon A, Stahl A. Diabetes. 2006;55:3229–3237. doi: 10.2337/db06-0749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Zou Z, Tong F, Faergeman NJ, Borsting C, Black PN, DiRusso CC. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:16414–16422. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M210557200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Dourlen P, Sujkowski A, Wessells R, Mollereau B. Prog Lipid Res. 2015;60:30–40. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2015.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Schaffer JE. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2002;282:E239–246. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00462.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Schaffer JE, Lodish HF. Cell. 1994;79:427–436. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90252-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Guo W, Huang N, Cai J, Xie W, Hamilton JA. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006;290:G528–534. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00386.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Pei Z, Fraisl P, Berger J, Jia Z, Forss-Petter S, Watkins PA. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:54454–54462. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M410091200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Digel M, Ehehalt R, Stremmel W, Fullekrug J. Mol Cell Biochem. 2009;326:23–28. doi: 10.1007/s11010-008-0003-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Hall AM, Smith AJ, Bernlohr DA. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:43008–43013. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M306575200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Hall AM, Wiczer BM, Herrmann T, Stremmel W, Bernlohr DA. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:11948–11954. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M412629200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Heinzer AK, Kemp S, Lu JF, Watkins PA, Smith KD. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:28765–28773. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M203053200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Heinzer AK, Watkins PA, Lu JF, Kemp S, Moser AB, Li YY, Mihalik S, Powers JM, Smith KD. Hum Mol Gen. 2003;12:1145–1154. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddg126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Jia Z, Pei Z, Li Y, Wei L, Smith KD, Watkins PA. Mol Genet Metab. 2004;83:117–127. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2004.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Mihalik SJ, Steinberg SJ, Pei Z, Park J, Kim DG, Heinzer AK, Dacremont G, Wanders RJ, Cuebas DA, Smith KD, Watkins PA. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:24771–24779. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M203295200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Pei Z, Sun P, Huang P, Lal B, Laterra J, Watkins PA. Cancer Res. 2009;69:9175–9182. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Watkins PA, Maiguel D, Jia Z, Pevsner J. J Lipid Res. 2007;48:2736–2750. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M700378-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Ason B, Castro-Perez J, Tep S, Stefanni A, Tadin-Strapps M, Roddy T, Hankemeier T, Hubbard B, Sachs AB, Michael Flanagan W, Kuklin NA, Mitnaul LJ. Lipids. 2011;46:991–1003. doi: 10.1007/s11745-011-3596-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Doege H, Baillie RA, Ortegon AM, Tsang B, Wu Q, Punreddy S, Hirsch D, Watson N, Gimeno RE, Stahl A. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1245–1258. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Henne WM, Liou J, Emr SD. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2015;35:123–130. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2015.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Henne WM, Zhu L, Balogi Z, Stefan C, Pleiss JA, Emr SD. J Cell Biol. 2015;210:541–551. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201503088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Matsufuji T, Ikeda M, Naito A, Hirouchi M, Kanda S, Izumi M, Harada J, Shinozuka T. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2013;23:2560–2565. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.02.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Blackburn C, Guan B, Brown J, Cullis C, Condon SM, Jenkins TJ, Peluso S, Ye Y, Gimeno RE, Punreddy S, Sun Y, Wu H, Hubbard B, Kaushik V, Tummino P, Sanchetti P, Yu Sun D, Daniels T, Tozzo E, Balani SK, Raman P. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2006;16:3504–3509. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.03.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Lu JF, Lawler AM, Watkins PA, Powers JM, Moser AB, Moser HW, Smith KD. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:9366–9371. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.17.9366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Wisniewski JR, Friedrich A, Keller T, Mann M, Koepsell H. J Proteome Res. 2015;14:353–365. doi: 10.1021/pr500833v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.van den Bosch HM, Bunger M, de Groot PJ, van der Meijde J, Hooiveld GJ, Muller M. BMC Genomics. 2007;8:267. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Schrimpe-Rutledge AC, Fontes G, Gritsenko MA, Norbeck AD, Anderson DJ, Waters KM, Adkins JN, Smith RD, Poitout V, Metz TO. J Proteome Res. 2012;11:3520–3532. doi: 10.1021/pr3002996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Ahowesso C, Black PN, Saini N, Montefusco D, Chekal J, Malosh C, Lindsley CW, Stauffer SR, DiRusso CC. Biochem Pharmacol. 2015;98:167–181. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2015.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Hirai T, Fukui Y, Motojima K. Biol Pharm Bull. 2007;30:2185–2190. doi: 10.1248/bpb.30.2185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Ramos-Roman MA, Lapidot SA, Phair RD, Parks EJ. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012;32:1799–1808. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.112.250019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Tamura S, Shimomura I. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:1139–1142. doi: 10.1172/JCI24930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Gashaw I, Ellinghaus P, Sommer A, Asadullah K. Drug Discov Today. 2012;17(Suppl):S24–30. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2011.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Li H, Black PN, Chokshi A, Sandoval-Alvarez A, Vatsyayan R, Sealls W, DiRusso CC. J Lipid Res. 2008;49:230–244. doi: 10.1194/jlr.D700015-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Li H, Black PN, DiRusso CC. Anal Biochem. 2005;336:11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2004.09.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Makarem N, Chandran U, Bandera EV, Parekh N. Annu Rev Nutr. 2013;33:319–348. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-112912-095300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Yasutake K, Kohjima M, Kotoh K, Nakashima M, Nakamuta M, Enjoji M. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:1756–1767. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i7.1756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Ricchi M, Odoardi MR, Carulli L, Anzivino C, Ballestri S, Pinetti A, Fantoni LI, Marra F, Bertolotti M, Banni S, Lonardo A, Carulli N, Loria P. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:830–840. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05733.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Zhang X, Liang D, Guo B, Deng W, Chi ZH, Cai Y, Wang L, Ma J. Cellular signalling. 2013;25:999–1010. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Alkhouri N, Dixon LJ, Feldstein AE. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;3:445–451. doi: 10.1586/egh.09.32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Frigerio F, Brun T, Bartley C, Usardi A, Bosco D, Ravnskjaer K, Mandrup S, Maechler P. Diabetologia. 2010;53:331–340. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1590-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Isler D, Moeglen C, Gains N, Meier MK. Br J Nutr. 1995;73:851–862. doi: 10.1079/bjn19950090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Calder PC. Biochem Soc Trans. 2005;33:423–427. doi: 10.1042/BST0330423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Saini N, Black PN, Montefusco D, DiRusso CC. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;465:534–541. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.08.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Listenberger LL, Han X, Lewis SE, Cases S, Farese RV, Jr, Ory DS, Schaffer JE. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:3077–3082. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0630588100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Rial E, Rodriguez-Sanchez L, Gallardo-Vara E, Zaragoza P, Moyano E, Gonzalez-Barroso MM. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1797:800–806. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Unger RH. Annu Rev Med. 2002;53:319–336. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.53.082901.104057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Unger RH. Hypertension. 2005;45:1031–1034. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000165683.09053.02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.van de Weijer T, Schrauwen-Hinderling VB, Schrauwen P. Cardiovasc Res. 2011;92:10–18. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvr212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Bios

RESOURCES