Abstract
Small pore sizes inherent to electrospun matrices can hinder efficient cellular ingrowth. To facilitate infiltration while retaining its extracellular matrix-like character, electrospinning was combined with salt leaching to produce a scaffold having deliberate, engineered delaminations. We made elegant use of a specific randomizing component of the electrospinning process, the Taylor Cone and the falling fiber beneath it, to produce a uniform, well-spread distribution of salt particles. After 3 weeks of culture, up to 4 mm of cellular infiltration was observed, along with cellular coverage of up to 70% within the delaminations. To our knowledge, this represents the first observation of extensive cellular infiltration of electrospun matrices. Infiltration appears to be driven primarily by localized proliferation rather than coordinated cellular locomotion. Cells also moved from the salt-generated porosity into the surrounding electrospun fiber matrix. Given that the details of salt deposition (amount, size, and number density) are far from optimized, the result provides a convincing illustration of the ability of mammalian cells to interact with appropriately tailored electrospun matrices. These layered structures can be precisely fabricated by varying the deposition interval and particle size conceivably to produce in vivo-like gradients in porosity such that the resulting scaffolds better resemble the desired final structure.
INTRODUCTION
Tissue engineering has emerged as a promising means of replacing damaged organs. Cells are seeded in vitro in/on a scaffold, supplied with adequate nutrients and benefit from active removal of waste products. Such scaffolds should promote appropriate cellular adhesion, proliferation, and specific levels of function. Materials used are typically biodegradable and are resorbed either after or during successful tissue regeneration. In addition, a high level of porosity is desired to enable both the efficient influx of anabolic nutrients and the outflow of catabolic wastes.
Methods such as solvent casting/particulate leaching,1 gas forming,2 emulsion lyophilization,3 and phase separation4 have been used to generate 3-dimensional scaffolds from natural and synthetic biodegradable polymers including collagen, poly(lactic acid) (PLA), poly(glycolic acid) (PGA), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), and poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL). These scaffolds show consistent promise in promoting overall levels of cellular proliferation.
Another method producing such highly interconnected porous structures is electrospinning. First patented by Formhals in 1934,5 this technique yields a nonwoven fiber mesh that greatly resembles extracellular matrix (ECM). Typical fiber diameters range from 10 nm to 10 μm,6 providing a substantial surface area per unit volume, a property promoting cellular adhesion. Electrospinning allows limited control of the pore sizes found between interfiber contacts by selecting an average diameter7 via control of spinning parameters such as solution viscosity, distance, and voltage.
PCL is a good candidate material when scaffolds require short-term load-bearing ability owing to its relatively slow degradation rate in vivo.8 Scaffolds made of PLA, PGA, or PLGA exhibit shrinkage and substantial chemical degradation shortly after biological exposures involving hydrolysis.9 PCL, in contrast, is relatively inert; phagocytosis of PCL by macrophages and giant cells occurs only once the molecular weight of the polymer is reduced to 3000 or less by nonenzymatic bulk hydrolysis of the ester linkages.10,11 Electrospun PCL has, logically, been selected as a scaffolding for bone12–15 and cartilage16–18 to support cell proliferation and ECM deposition.
Paradoxically, however, the small fiber size intrinsic to electrospinning can hinder efficient cellular infiltration. Eichhorn et al.7 have shown that the mean pore radius of electrospun matrices varies with fiber diameter. For example, a 100-nm fiber diameter yields a mean pore radius less than 10 nm at a relative density of 80%. The comparative size of a rounded cell—ranging from 5 to 20 μm—shows that such small pore sizes will obstruct cellular migration. For a scaffold that requires minimal cellular infiltration (e.g., a vascular graft) proliferation limited to the surface may be acceptable or even desirable. However, the thickness of human articular cartilage in the knee has been observed to range from 0.5 to 7.1 mm.19 To achieve uniform cellular proliferation throughout such thick scaffolds, both relatively large pore sizes and extended culture periods are necessary. Further, articular cartilage can be naturally anisotropic, being composed of superficial, middle, deep, and calcified zones,20 which will require scaffolds possessing variable porosity and architecture.
In this study, we designed and fabricated an electrospun scaffold providing localized, controllable macroscopic porosity by combining electrospinning with the well-established technique of salt leaching.1,21,22 Specific characteristics of the two processes form a useful synergy, producing a more uniform scaffold than would normally be expected from a salt-based technique. The result facilitates anisotropic cellular infiltration while retaining the highly porous, ECM-like nature of electrospun scaffolds.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Electrospinning
A 12 wt.% solution of PCL (Mw 65,000, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in acetone (Mallinckroff Chemicals, Phillipsburg, NJ) was prepared and electrospun at 23 kV using a high voltage DC power supply (Model FC50R2, Glassman high voltage, High Bridge, NJ) with a 20-cm tip-to-substrate distance and a flow rate of 18 mL/h onto aluminum foil wrapped on a 4- ×4-in. steel plate. Salt crystals previously sieved to sizes between 90 and 106 μm were introduced into the Taylor Cone and the falling fiber beneath it as shown in Fig. 1. The amount of NaCl in each layer was approximately 0.75 g and covered approximately 10% of the surface area of the aluminum foil. Deposition of each allotment of NaCl required 30–60 s during electrospinning; the interval between each allotment was either 5 or 10 min. Electrospinning under these conditions required approximately 90 min to make approximately 5 mm thick sheets. For specific comparisons of cellular penetration, approximately 4 mm thick sheets were spun without salt incorporation utilizing otherwise identical conditions.
FIG. 1.
Schematic illustration of an electrospinning setup showing the mechanical introduction of salt crystals (gray particles): (a) syringe pump, (b) extension tubing, (c) sheath surrounding the needle into which the crystals are added, (d) needle through which voltage is applied, (e) electrospun fiber interacting with falling NaCl crystals, and (f) grounded collector.
In specific cases, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (Sigma-Aldrich) was added (0.1 mg/mL) to the polymer–acetone solution before electrospinning to fluorescently label electrospun PCL fiber. This enabled us to observe both the electrospun fiber and the infiltrating cells in sectioned samples via fluorescent microscopy.
The deposited sheet was carefully punched with a dermal biopsy punch (Miltex, York, PA) to generate cylindrical “plugs” 3 or 6 mm in diameter and approximately 5 mm in height. The plugs were then inserted into a sealed plastic bag and this bag placed into a 45°C water bath for 10 min to achieve the partial sintering needed to prevent the extensive delamination otherwise observed after exposure to aqueous solution. The embedded salt crystals were then leached out by exposure to DI water at 37°C for 3 days; the DI water was replaced every 24 h.
Cell culture
The CFK2 cell line (obtained from Dr. Henderson’s lab, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada) having the phenotypic characteristics of chondrocytes derived from fetal rat calvariae23 was used. Approximately 650,000 cells per sample placed in a 12-well tissue culture plate (Falcon, Franklin Lakes, NJ) were gravitationally seeded onto salt-leached plugs lying on their sides in each well. The seeded cells were cultured in Ham’s F-12 medium (Mediatech, Herndon, VA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Mediatech, Herndon, VA), 1% penicillin–streptomycin (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ), and 1% L-glutamine (Mediatech, Herndon, VA). The culture medium was changed every other day. The samples were harvested at day 3 and week 3 before subsequent characterization.
SEM
Samples were coated with an 8 nm thick layer of osmium (OPC-80T, SPI Supplies, West Chester, PA). Samples emerging from cell culture were fixed with 10% formalin (Richard-Allen Scientific, Kalamazoo, MI) and exposed to a graded ethanol series in DI water (50%, 70%, 85%, 90%, and 100% ethanol) to achieve dehydration that was then finalized using a graded ethanol–hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS, Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) series (25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% HMDS) followed by drying under a hood overnight. The dried sample was either coated directly with osmium or gently parted along the salt-generated gaps to observe cell migration before osmium coating.
Cryosection
Samples cultured for 3 weeks were fixed with 10% formalin followed by three 10-min rinses in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, Mediatech, Herndon, VA). The fixed samples were embedded in OCT compound (Sakura Finetek, Torrance, CA) and then frozen at −80°C. The frozen samples were cut to 12-μm sections via a cryostat (CM3050S, Leica Microsystems, Bannockburn, IL) and placed onto Super Frost Plus glass slides (Fisher Scientific). The samples were stored at –80°C until staining.
Nuclear staining
The cryosectioned samples were rinsed 4 times with PBS to remove residual OCT. The cells were then permeablized with 0.2% TritonX-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min followed by 3 rinses with PBS. The samples were stained with 0.01% 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenyl-indole dihydrochloride (DAPI, Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 5 min in the dark. The stained samples were observed via an Axioplan2 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY).
Histochemical staining
The cryosectioned samples were rinsed 4 times with PBS. The samples were then stained using a 1.5% Safranin O (Sigma-Aldrich) reagent for 40 min. The Safranin O solution was filtered through a 0.45-μm pore size nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) before use. The stained samples were quickly rinsed several times in DI water and observed under a microscope.
RESULTS
The interaction between the dispensed salt crystals and the fibers during electrospinning is shown in Fig. 2a. Under normal circumstances the falling salt would deposit directly below the exit of the sheath in Fig. 1. Interaction with the Taylor Cone and the solidifying fiber beneath it carried falling salt out beyond the circumference of the sheath via spirally moving fibers, resulting in a uniform distribution within the deposited layer. Uniformity was dependent on the weight, and hence the size, of the crystals. Previous use of salt particles larger than 150 μm produced visibly nonuniform salt distributions concentrated directly below the sheath. Figure 2b shows electrospun fibers wrapped around an incorporated NaCl crystal. A normal electrospun morphology (rounded fibers) is observed in spite of the presence of the salt crystal.
FIG. 2.
(a) Image of salt particles interacting with fibers during electrospinning. (b) SEM image of a salt particle entrapped by a large group of fibers.
A low-magnification scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of a cylindrical plug containing incorporated salt crystals is shown in Fig. 3a. A partially delaminated layered structure is evident owing to the volume of incorporated particles. Gap sizes appear to range from 100 to 200 μm. Salt distribution within each delamination is relatively uniform. The side of the plug was slightly smeared because of shear forces applied during punching. Much more shallow (less than 10 μm in depth) delaminations were also produced within each layer, and these are likely a characteristic of the electrospinning process itself because no salt was being deposited at those points during the spinning. A salt crystal entrapped by fibers marked by an arrow is shown (Fig. 3b). Each delaminated layer is held together by fibers deposited during salt incorporation. These fiber meshes were strong enough, thanks in part to the limited sintering (45°C for 10 min) that caused the formation of simple “necks” between fibers, to maintain an overall monolithic structure during salt leaching and subsequent cell culture. The structure of PCL fibrous plug after salt leaching is shown in Fig. 4a. As expected, leaching did not visibly degrade the fibers but some slight swelling of the overall structure was observed. This expansion seemed to be largely due to springback resulting from the release of compressive forces applied during punching. Figure 4b shows partially delaminated layers joined by “vertically” (in this image) oriented fibers. Salt incorporation followed by leaching increased relative as-spun porosity from 79 (salt-free) to 83.2%.
FIG. 3.
(a) Side view of an as-punched 37 mm diameter PCL plug containing salt crystals. (b) A salt particle (arrow) entrapped by large groups of fibers within a delamination.
FIG. 4.
SEM images of (a) PCL plug after NaCl leaching showing approximately 200-μm pores and (b) fibers holding two partially delaminated layers together.
The distance between each delamination can be controlled by the intervals between additions of salt crystals. A 10-min interval resulted in approximately 450 μm thick layers while 5-min intervals resulted in approximately 230 μm thick layers. The shorter (5-min) time intervals also increased the overall porosity, to 86.5%.
Figure 5 documents the various morphologies adopted by CFK2 cells seeded on the salt-leached plug at day 3. Some cells are rounded (Fig. 5a) while others display a slightly elongated morphology (Fig. 5b). ECM accumulation on the plasma membrane is apparent in Fig. 5a and b.
FIG. 5.
SEM images of the seeded cells showing either rounded (a) or slightly elongated (b) shapes on the salt leached PCL plug at day 3.
Figure 6 provides images taken from a stained plug cryosection after 3 weeks of culture. Cellular nuclei are blue and the FITC-labeled PCL fibers are green. The presence of cells along the deposition plane shows that they clearly infiltrated along the pores formed by the salt crystals. A few cells infiltrate “vertically” into the electrospun mesh (see the circle in Fig. 6a) but the majority appears to be enclosed within the cavities formed by salt dissolution. Figure 6b shows a magnified image of the cells (marked with a circle in Fig. 6a) infiltrating both horizontally and vertically. Compared to the salt-leached samples, the cellular infiltration into electrospun structure that did not contain salt generated pores was minimal over the same culture duration (Fig. 6c and d). The maximum infiltration we were able to observe was approximately 160 μm (see Fig. 6d).
FIG. 6.
Nuclear stained (DAPI; blue stains) sample cryosectioned to 12 μm in thickness after 3 weeks of culture in the samples with (a, b) and without (c, d) prior salt incorporation. (a) Cellular infiltration through salt-generated pores (×100) and (b) cellular infiltration into the PCL fiber meshes in some area (magnified image of the circled area in Fig. 6a) (×200). (c) Outer surface cellular coverage without infiltration (×100) and (d) maximum cellular penetration (approximately 160 μm) observed in a sample spun without any incorporated salt. Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/ten.
Horizontal cross-sections of the cell-seeded plug cultured for 3 weeks were observed (Fig. 7). Even though the samples were 6 mm in diameter these cross-sections were infiltrated in the range from 35% to 70% (Fig. 7a and b). The average (from 18 layers) and standard deviation of the cell coverage was determined to be 59.5 ± 9.2% (see Table 1). Lighter colored regions (marked as regions 1 and 3 in the picture) contain cells while no cells were present in the darker colored region (marked as region 2). High-resolution images of regions 1 and 3 reveal infiltrating cells along with the presence of accumulated ECM. Cellular penetration began at the edge of the salt-generated porosity and progressed inwards (in some cases substantially).
FIG. 7.
SEM images of the delaminated layers showing cellular infiltration after 3 weeks of culture; cells are shown covering (a) approximately 70% and (b) approximately 35% of the 6-mm cross sections in the same plug; regions 1 and 3 show cellular infiltrated areas; region 2, no cellular coverage. (c) High-resolution image of region 1 and (d) high-resolution image of region 3.
Table 1.
Variation in Fiber Diameter and Cellular Coverage for Delaminated Areas Taken from Two Specimens
Layer | Sample 1
|
Sample 2
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Average fiber diameter (μm) | Cellular coverage (%) | Average fiber diameter (μm) | Cellular coverage (%) | |
1 | 0.71 | 35.2 | 0.72 | 50.7 |
2 | 0.73 | 50.8 | 0.72 | 64.4 |
3 | 0.73 | 55.3 | 0.73 | 59.3 |
4 | 0.74 | 69.8 | 0.75 | 68.2 |
5 | 0.76 | 68.8 | 0.74 | 67.4 |
6 | 0.75 | 64.5 | 0.74 | 70.5 |
7 | 0.74 | 67.7 | 0.74 | 54.1 |
8 | 0.75 | 58.2 | 0.74 | 58.9 |
9 | 0.75 | 50.7 | 0.75 | 56.6 |
Average | 0.74 | 57.9 ± 11.3 | 0.74 | 61.1 ± 6.8 |
The average fiber diameters and cellular coverages are included along with the standard deviation of the latter.
Finally, Fig. 8 shows glycosaminoglycan (GAG) distribution in the cryosectioned sample after 3 weeks of culture using a Safranin O (red) stain. The majority of the GAG content is observed in the gaps generated by salt leaching consistent with the cell distributions shown in Figs. 6 and 7. In Fig. 8, the vertically aligned fibers that hold the delaminated layers together, and the associated adherent cells, can be clearly observed.
FIG. 8.
Safranin O–stained sample cryosectioned in 12 μm after 3-week culture shows GAG (red stains) accumulation in the NaCl crystal-generated pores. Vertical fibers that hold partially delaminated electrospun layers are also observed (×200). Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/ten.
DISCUSSION
Electrospinning is a promising technique allowing efficient, economical production of tissue engineering scaffolds. The process produces a unique nonwoven nano- and/ or microfibrous structure that resembles natural ECM. The influence of nano- or micro-structures on cellular migration, orientation, and cytoskeletal organization has been demonstrated,24–27 and electrospun topographies significantly enhance cellular behavior.28
However, as has been pointed out, pore size exponentially decreases with fiber size.7 Zhang et al. reported cellular infiltration of only 48 μm using bone marrow stromal cells.29 Van Lieshout et al. also showed poor penetration of human myofibroblasts into electrospun PCL compared to a knitted equivalent.30 Li et al. postulate that cells on an electrospun “surface” could penetrate by enzymatic degradation of individual fibers31 but this mechanism is improbable for relatively resistant synthetics such as PCL. Faster “degraders” such as PGA, PLA, and gelatin can be used but at the cost of poorer initial chemical and mechanical stability.
Within this framework, it seems clear that efficient initial seeding is critical for tailored cellular ingrowth into electrospun scaffolds to produce in vivo-like cellular distributions. Dynamic depth filtration has achieved effective seeding in other fibrous scaffolds32,33 but would not be as successful in standard electrospun matrices owing to the small pore sizes. Stankus et al.34 developed a method that simultaneously introduces cells into a scaffold simultaneous with electrospinning providing concurrent deposition of cells and fibers throughout the scaffold.
The inherent appeal of marrying salt deposition with electrospinning is that it utilizes the inherent randomness of the Taylor Cone and the falling fiber beneath it to achieve uniform results that guide subsequent cell proliferation. Simple vertical additions of salt to the surface of the collector plate would be biased based on their method of introduction. The result could not be uniform unless considerable effort went into altering the normal gravity-driven trajectory of the introduced salt particles. With the current technique, a much simpler approach succeeds in providing a uniform distribution because it interacts with the elongating, whipping fiber formed by the balance between electrostatic repulsion and solution viscosity to result in a relatively random, uniform arrangement of salt particles in the as-deposited mass. Neither solvent evaporation nor the formation of nanometer-scale fiber diameters appears to be affected by the presence of the adhering salt particles, as indicated by the insignificant changes in average fiber diameter in each delaminated layer (Table 1). In other contexts involving the use of salt as a porogen a lack of control of salt placement can result in distinct gradients in porosity and pore size. An additional consequence, poor diffusion between largely disconnected porosity, is avoided here because electrospinning is characterized by highly interconnected (albeit cell-impermeable; see Fig. 6) pores.
Figure 5 shows cells in various shapes in which they exhibit different levels of mobility.35–37 Most surprising, given the relative inefficiency of the simple gravity-based seeding employed here, was that the nearly complete (in some cases) penetration of the salt-generated gap observed (Figs. 6 and 7). Figure 8 validates the observations of both horizontal and vertical penetration while showing that the cells have apparently retained an appropriate phenotype capable of producing glycosaminoglycan. Given that the details of salt deposition (amount size, number density) are far from optimized, the result provides a clear illustration of the ability of mammalian cells to infiltrate appropriately engineered electrospun matrices.
To our knowledge, this represents the first observation of extensive cellular infiltration of electrospun matrices. Thus it is important to examine and understand the nature of infiltration. Figure 9 shows that cell clustering can take several forms. Relatively “thick” cell populations are observed at points of initial cell seeding (Fig. 9a) at the edge of the cylinders. These represent the initial gravity-driven cellular deposition into the edge of the gap (Fig. 4b) followed by proliferation leading to the observed mass of cells. Internal to the plug we see evidence for both large numbers of cells (Fig. 9b) as well as more scattered, isolated cell populations (Fig. 9c). Infiltration was highly variable; Fig. 7a shows nearly complete penetration of a delaminated cross-section and Fig. 7b shows cell populations scattered in between areas in which fiber density apparently remains high enough such that no cells are present. The origin of these disparate populations merits discussion. Distances of 3000–6000 μm were clearly spanned by these cells. Given the apparent good adhesion of the cells to the electrospun fiber, it seems likely that infiltration is primarily driven by localized proliferation rather than cellular locomotion. The latter, at roughly 100 μm/day,38 would not be sufficient to allow for the cross-sectional coverage observed after only 3 weeks of culture. It would be interesting to determine how much culture time or initial porosity would be needed for proliferation to lead to physical delamination of these structures. The given method of salt incorporation used here leads to variations in porosity substantial enough to allow easy access of cells in some cases (Fig. 6a and b) while minimizing access in others (Table 1). Areas in between salt deposition appear to be no more cell permeable than the as-electrospun fiber (Fig. 6c and d).
FIG. 9.
SEM images of (a) dense cellular population near the edge of the plug, (b) dense cellular population, and (c) sparse population in the middle of the plug.
The method developed in this study provides large pores into which cells can infiltrate without first requiring fiber degradation. We showed that cells can migrate up to approximately 4 mm and can cover approximately 70% of the cross-sectional area of these 6 mm diameter plugs using simple gravitational seeding. If a dynamic seeding—like the depth-infiltration seeding developed by Li et al.33—is applied to this scaffold infiltration would likely be even more effective. This technique clearly provides considerable flexibility in scaffold design and in promoting cellular ingrowth along specific directions. Both the amount of salt and the particle size will doubtless be important. Further, the layered structure can be precisely tailored by varying the deposition interval to produce controlled gradients in pore distribution. This gradient can lead to cellular density gradient in a scaffold that better resembles the in vivo equivalent, for example, the zonal anisotropic structure of cartilage.
CONCLUSIONS
By combining salt leaching with electrospinning, we demonstrate a method that produces a delaminated structure in an electrospun scaffold. With this method, not only can cellular infiltration into a thick, 3-dimensional electrospun scaffold be facilitated, but scaffolds having designed, anisotropic structures can also be produced to guide cellular proliferation to better approximate targeted tissues.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the Ohio Oncological Biomaterials Fund and NIH Grant# AR048781. We express our deepest thanks to David Rigney of the Ohio State University for his suggestion regarding fiber sintering.
References
- 1.Liao CJ, Chen CF, Chen JH, Chiang SF, Lin YJ, Chang KY. Fabrication of porous biodegradable polymer scaffolds using a solvent merging/particulate leaching method. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;59:676. doi: 10.1002/jbm.10030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kim SS, Park MS, Jeon O, Choi CY, Kim BS. Poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006;27:1399. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hou QP, Grijpma DW, Feijen J. Preparation of interconnected highly porous polymeric structures by a replication and freeze-drying process. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003;67B:732. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.10066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tu CF, Cai Q, Yang J, Wan YQ, Bei JZ, Wang S. The fabrication and characterization of poly(lactic acid) scaffolds for tissue engineering by improved solid-liquid phase separation. Polym Adv Technol. 2003;14:565. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Formhals A. Apparatus for Producing Artificial Filaments from Material Such as Cellulose Acetate. Schreiber-Gastell, Richard; 1934. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fridrikh SV, Yu JH, Brenner MP, Rutledge GC. Controlling the fiber diameter during electrospinning. Phys Rev Lett. 2003;90:144502. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.144502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Eichhorn SJ, Sampson WW. Statistical geometry of pores and statistics of porous nanofibrous assemblies. J Roy Soc Interface. 2005;2:309. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2005.0039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Woodward SC, Brewer PS, Moatamed F. The intracellular degradation of poly(e-caprolactone) J Biomed Mater Res. 1985;19:437. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820190408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shin HJ, Lee CH, Cho IH, Kim YJ, Lee YJ, Kim IA, Park KD, Yui N, Shin JW. Electrospun PLGA nanofiber scaffolds for articular cartilage reconstruction: mechanical stability, degradation and cellular responses under mechanical stimulation in vitro. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2006;17:103. doi: 10.1163/156856206774879126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pitt CG, Chasalow FI, Hibionada YM, Klimas DM, Schindler A. Aliphatic polyesters. I. The degradation of poly(e-caprolactone) in vivo. J Appl Polym Sci. 1981;26:3779. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pitt CG, Gratzl MM, Kimmel GL, Surles J, Schindler A. Aliphatic polyesters II. The degradation of poly (DL-lactide), poly (epsilon-caprolactone), and their copolymers in vivo. Biomaterials. 1981;2:215. doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(81)90060-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fujihara K, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S. Guided bone regeneration membrane made of polycaprolactone/calcium carbonate composite nanofibers. Biomaterials. 2005;26:4139. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shin M, Yoshimoto H, Vacanti Joseph P. In vivo bone tissue engineering using mesenchymal stem cells on a novel electrospun nanofibrous scaffold. Tissue Eng. 2004;10:33. doi: 10.1089/107632704322791673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yoshimoto H, Shin YM, Terai H, Vacanti JP. A biodegradable nanofiber scaffold by electrospinning and its potential for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2003;24:2077. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00635-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wutticharoenmongkol P, Sanchavanakit N, Pavasant P, Supaphol P. Novel bone scaffolds of electrospun polycaprolactone fibers filled with nanoparticles. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2006;6:514. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2006.090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Li W-j, Danielson KG, Alexander PG, Tuan RS. Biological response of chondrocytes cultured in three-dimensional nanofibrous poly(e-caprolactone) scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;67A:1105. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.10101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li W-J, Tuli R, Huang X, Laquerriere P, Tuan RS. Multilineage differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in a three-dimensional nanofibrous scaffold. Biomaterials. 2005;26:5158. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Li WJW-J, Tuli R, Okafor C, Derfoul A, Danielson KGKG, Hall DJDJ, Tuan RSRS. A three-dimensional nanofibrous scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering using human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials. 2005;26:599. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kladny B, Martus P, Schiwy-Bochat KH, Weseloh G, Swoboda B. Measurement of cartilage thickness in the human knee-joint by magnetic resonance imaging using a three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence. Int Orthop. 1999;23:264. doi: 10.1007/s002640050367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Woodfield TBF, Bezemer JM, Pieper JS, van Blitterswijk CA, Riesle J. Scaffolds for tissue engineering of cartilage. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Express. 2002;12:209. doi: 10.1615/critreveukaryotgeneexpr.v12.i3.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Katoh K, Tanabe T, Yamauchi K. Novel approach to fabricate keratin sponge scaffolds with controlled pore size and porosity. Biomaterials. 2004;25:4255. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lu L, Peter SJ, Lyman MD, Lai HL, Leite SM, Tamada JA, Uyama S, Vacanti JP, Langer R, Mikos AG. In vitro and in vivo degradation of porous poly(DL-lactic-co-glycolic acid) foams. Biomaterials. 2000;21:1837. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00047-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bernier SM, Goltzman D. Regulation of expression of the chondrocytic phenotype in a skeletal cell line (CFK2) in vitro. J Bone Miner Res. 1993;8:475. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650080412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Flemming RG, Murphy CJ, Abrams GA, Goodman SL, Nealey PF. Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. Biomaterials. 1999;20:573. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(98)00209-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Powell HM, Kniss DA, Lannutti JJ. Nanotopographic control of cytoskeletal organization. Langmuir. 2006;22:5087. doi: 10.1021/la052993q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Powell HM, Lannutti JJ. Nanofibrillar surfaces via reactive ion etching. Langmuir. 2003;19:9071. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Von Recum AF, Van Kooten TG. The influence of microtopography on cellular response and the implications for silicone implants. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 1995;7:181. doi: 10.1163/156856295x00698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nam J, Huang Y, Agarwal S, Lannutti JJ. Enhanced chondrocytic cell response to an electrospun topography. Submitted. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhang Y, Ouyang H, Lim Chwee T, Ramakrishna S, Huang Z-M. Electrospinning of gelatin fibers and gelatin/ PCL composite fibrous scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res Part B, Applied Biomat. 2005;72:156. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Van Lieshout MI, Vaz CM, Rutten MCM, Peters GWM, Baaijens FPT. Electrospinning versus knitting: Two scaffolds for tissue engineering of the aortic valve. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2006;17:77. doi: 10.1163/156856206774879153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Li WJ, Laurencin CT, Caterson EJ, Tuan RS, Ko FK. Electrospun nanofibrous structure: A novel scaffold for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;60:613. doi: 10.1002/jbm.10167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Feng Z, Teng M. Perfusion bioreactor system for human mesenchymal stem cell tissue engineering: Dynamic cell seeding and construct development. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005;91:482. doi: 10.1002/bit.20532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Li Y, Ma T, Kniss DA, Lasky LC, Yang ST. Effects of filtration seeding on cell density, spatial distribution, and proliferation in nonwoven fibrous matrices. Biotechnol Prog. 2001;17:935. doi: 10.1021/bp0100878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Stankus JJ, Guan JJ, Fujimoto K, Wagner WR. Microintegrating smooth muscle cells into a biodegradable, elastomeric fiber matrix. Biomaterials. 2006;27:735. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.06.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Aszodi A, Hunziker EB, Brakebusch C, Fassler R. beta 1 integrins regulate chondrocyte rotation, G1 progression, and cytokinesis. Genes Dev. 2003;17:2465. doi: 10.1101/gad.277003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Grashoff C, Aszodi A, Sakai T, Hunziker EB, Faessler R. Integrin-linked kinase regulates chondrocyte shape and proliferation. EMBO Rep. 2003;4:432. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.embor801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Panda DK, Miao DS, Lefebvre V, Hendy GN, Goltzman D. The transcription factor SOX9 regulates cell cycle and differentiation genes in chondrocytic CFK2 cells. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:41229. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M104231200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chao PH, Roy R, Mauck RL, Liu W, Valhmu WB, Hung CT. Chondrocyte translocation response to direct current electric fields. J Biomech Eng. 2000;122:261. doi: 10.1115/1.429661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
This article has been cited by
- 1.Lee Jung Min, Chae Taesik, Sheikh Faheem A, Ju Hyung Woo, Moon Bo Mi, Park Hyun Jung, Park Ye Ri, Park Chan Hum. Three dimensional poly(ε-caprolactone) and silk fibroin nanocomposite fibrous matrix for artificial dermis. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2016;68:758–767. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pauly Hannah M, Kelly Daniel J, Popat Ketul C, Trujillo Nathan A, Dunne Nicholas J, McCarthy Helen O, Haut Donahue Tammy L. Mechanical properties and cellular response of novel electrospun nanofibers for ligament tissue engineering: Effects of orientation and geometry. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2016;61:258–270. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.03.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Li Dawei, Chen Weiming, Sun Binbin, Li Haoxuan, Wu Tong, Ke Qinfei, Huang Chen, EI-Hamshary Hany, Al-Deyab Salem S, Mo Xiumei. A Comparison of Nanoscale and Multiscale PCL/Gelatin Scaffolds Prepared by Disc-electrospinning. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Taskin Mehmet Berat, Xu Ruodan, Gregersen Hans, Nygaard Jens Vinge, Besenbacher Flemming, Chen Menglin. Three-Dimensional Polydopamine Functionalized Coiled Microfibrous Scaffolds Enhance Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Colonization and Mild Myofibroblastic Differentiation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2016;8(25):15864–15873. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b02994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mahjour Seyed Babak, Sefat Farshid, Polunin Yevgeniy, Wang Lichen, Wang Hongjun. Improved cell infiltration of electrospun nanofiber mats for layered tissue constructs. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2016;104(6):1479–1488. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cho Mira, Kim Seung-Hyun, Jin Gyuhyung, Park Kook In, Jang Jae-Hyung. Salt-Induced Electrospun Patterned Bundled Fibers for Spatially Regulating Cellular Responses. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2016;8(21):13320–13331. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b03848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hwang Patrick TJ, Lim Dong-Jin, Fee Timothy, Alexander Grant C, Tambralli Ajay, Andukuri Adinarayana, Tian Liqun, Cui Wanxing, Berry Joel, Gilbert Shawn R, Jun Ho-Wook. A bio-inspired hybrid nanosack for graft vascularization at the omentum. Acta Biomaterialia. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Maldonado Maricela, Ico Gerardo, Low Karen, Luu Rebeccah J, Nam Jin. Enhanced Lineage-Specific Differentiation Efficiency of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells by Engineering Colony Dimensionality Using Electrospun Scaffolds. Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2016;5(12):1408–1412. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201600141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hwang Patrick TJ, Murdock Kyle, Alexander Grant C, Salaam Amanee D, Ng Joshua I, Lim Dong-Jin, Dean Derrick, Jun Ho-Wook. Poly(ε-caprolactone)/gelatin composite electrospun scaffolds with porous crater-like structures for tissue engineering. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2016;104:1017–1029. doi: 10.1002/jbma.v104.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chen Huizhi, Peng Yan, Wu Shucheng, Tan Lay. Electrospun 3D Fibrous Scaffolds for Chronic Wound Repair. Materials. 2016;9(4):272. doi: 10.3390/ma9040272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Narayanan Naagarajan, Jiang Chunhui, Uzunalli Gozde, Thankappan Shalumon Kottappally, Laurencin Cato T, Deng Meng. Polymeric Electrospinning for Musculoskeletal Regenerative Engineering. Regenerative Engineering and Translational Medicine 2016 [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jun Indong, Chung Yong-Woo, Heo Yun-Hoe, Han Hyung-Seop, Park Jimin, Jeong Hongsoo, Lee Hyunjung, Lee Yu Bin, Kim Yu-Chan, Seok Hyun-Kwang, Shin Heungsoo, Jeon Hojeong. Creating Hierarchical Topographies on Fibrous Platforms Using Femtosecond Laser Ablation for Directing Myoblasts Behavior. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2016;8:3407–3417. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b11418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lee Boram, Shafiq Muhammad, Jung Youngmee, Park Jong-Chul, Kim Soo Hyun. Characterization and preparation of bio-tubular scaffolds for fabricating artificial vascular grafts by combining electrospinning and a co-culture system. Macromolecular Research. 2016;24:131–142. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Capulli AK, MacQueen LA, Sheehy Sean P, Parker KK. Fibrous scaffolds for building hearts and heart parts. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2016;96:83–102. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.11.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Horner CB, Low K, Nam J. Electrospun scaffolds for cartilage regeneration. :213–240. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hong Y. Electrospun fibrous polyurethane scaffolds in tissue engineering. :543–559. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Clark Elizabeth S, Best Cameron, Onwuka Ekene, Sugiura Tadahisa, Mahler Nathan, Bolon Brad, Niehaus Andrew, James Iyore, Hibino Narutoshi, Shinoka Toshiharu, Johnson Jed, Breuer Christopher K. Effect of cell seeding on neotissue formation in a tissue engineered trachea. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2016;51:49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cortez Tornello Pablo R, Ballarin Florencia Montini, Caracciolo Pablo C, Gustavo A. AbrahamMicro/nanofiber-based scaffolds for soft tissue engineering applications. :201–229. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mao N. Nonwoven fabric filters. :273–310. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yuan Huihua, Zhou Qihui, Li Biyun, Bao Min, Lou Xiangxin, Zhang Yanzhong. Direct printing of patterned three-dimensional ultrafine fibrous scaffolds by stable jet electrospinning for cellular ingrowth. Biofabrication. 2015;7:045004. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Efimov AE, Agapova OI, Parfenov VA, Pereira FDAS, Bulanova EA, Mironov VA, Agapova II. Investigating the micro- and nanostructure of microfibrous biocompatible polyurethane scaffold by scanning probe nanotomography. Nanotechnologies in Russia. 2015;10:925–929. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Orr Steven B, Chainani Abby, Hippensteel Kirk J, Kishan Alysha, Gilchrist Christopher, William Garrigues N, Ruch David S, Guilak Farshid, Little Dianne. Aligned multilayered electrospun scaffolds for rotator cuff tendon tissue engineering. Acta Biomaterialia. 2015;24:117–126. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Qian Yuna, Li Linhao, Jiang Chao, Xu Wei, Lv Yonggang, Zhong Li, Cai Kaiyong, Yang Li. The effect of hyaluronan on the motility of skin dermal fibroblasts in nanofibrous scaffolds. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2015;79:133–143. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.04.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Brennan Meadhbh Á, Renaud Audrey, Gamblin Annelaure, D’Arros Cyril, Nedellec Steven, Trichet Valerie, Layrolle Pierre. 3D cell culture and osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells plated onto jet-sprayed or electrospun microfiber scaffolds. Biomedical Materials. 2015;10:045019. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/10/4/045019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jones Desiree, Park DoYoung, Anghelina Mirela, Pécot Thierry, Machiraju Raghu, Xue Ruipeng, Lannutti John J, Thomas Jessica, Cole Sara L, Moldovan Leni, Moldovan Nicanor I. Actin grips: Circular actin-rich cytoskeletal structures that mediate the wrapping of polymeric microfibers by endothelial cells. Biomaterials. 2015;52:395–406. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Maldonado Maricela, Wong Lauren Y, Echeverria Cristina, Ico Gerardo, Low Karen, Fujimoto Taylor, Johnson Jed K, Nam Jin. The effects of electrospun substrate-mediated cell colony morphology on the self-renewal of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Biomaterials. 2015;50:10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.01.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sheikh Faheem A, Ju Hyung Woo, Lee Jung Min, Moon Bo Mi, Park Hyun Jung, Lee Ok Joo, Kim Jung-Ho, Kim Dong-Kyu, Park Chan Hum. 3D electrospun silk fibroin nanofibers for fabrication of artificial skin. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine. 2015;11:681–691. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2014.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Choi Ji Suk, Kim Hye Sung, Yoo Hyuk Sang. Electrospinning strategies of drug-incorporated nanofibrous mats for wound recovery. Drug Delivery and Translational Research. 2015;5:137–145. doi: 10.1007/s13346-013-0148-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kathleen Hoffman, Drago Skrtic, Jirun Sun, Wojtek Tutak. Airbrushed Composite Polymer Zr-ACP Nanofiber Scaffolds with Improved Cell Penetration for Bone Tissue Regeneration. Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods. 2015;21(3):284–291. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2014.0236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Frohbergh Michael E, Anya Katsman, Mondrinos Mark J, Stabler Collin T, Hankenson Kurt D, Oristaglio Jeffrey T, Lelkes Peter I. Osseointegrative Properties of Electrospun Hydroxyapatite-Containing Nanofibrous Chitosan Scaffolds. Tissue Engineering Part A. 2015;21(5–6):970–981. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pu Juan, Yuan Falei, Li Song, Komvopoulos Kyriakos. Electrospun bilayer fibrous scaffolds for enhanced cell infiltration and vascularization in vivo. Acta Biomaterialia. 2015;13:131–141. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhao Wen, Liu Wenlong, Li Jiaojiao, Lin Xiao, Wang Ying. Preparation of animal polysaccharides nanofibers by electrospinning and their potential biomedical applications. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2015;103:807–818. doi: 10.1002/jbm.v103.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Khorshidi Sajedeh, Solouk Atefeh, Mirzadeh Hamid, Mazinani Saeedeh, Lagaron Jose M, Sharifi Shahriar, Ramakrishna Seeram. A review of key challenges of electrospun scaffolds for tissue-engineering applications. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. 2015 doi: 10.1002/term.1978. n/a-n/a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mohan Neethu, Michael S. DetamoreBiomimetic Nanofibers for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering. :57–75. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Durham ER, Tronci G, Yang X, Wood DJ, Russell SJ. Nonwoven scaffolds for bone regeneration. pp. 45–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vellayappan MV, Jaganathan SK, Supriyanto E. Review: unraveling the less explored flocking technology for tissue engineering scaffolds. RSC Adv. 2015;5:73225–73240. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rivet Christopher J, Zhou Kun, Gilbert Ryan J, Finkelstein David I, Forsythe John S. Cell infiltration into a 3D electrospun fiber and hydrogel hybrid scaffold implanted in the brain. Biomatter. 2015;5:e1005527. doi: 10.1080/21592535.2015.1005527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Goonoo N, Bhaw-Luximon A, Rodriguez IA, Wesner D, Schönherr H, Bowlin GL, Jhurry D. Poly(ester-ether)s: III. assessment of cell behaviour on nanofibrous scaffolds of PCL, PLLA and PDX blended with amorphous PMeDX. J Mater Chem B. 2015;3:673–687. doi: 10.1039/c4tb01350f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kirchmajer DM, Gorkin R, III, in het Panhuis M. An overview of the suitability of hydrogel-forming polymers for extrusion-based 3D-printing. J Mater Chem B. 2015;3:4105–4117. doi: 10.1039/c5tb00393h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sun Bin, Jiang Xue-Jun, Zhang Shuchao, Zhang Jun-Cheng, Li Yi-Feng, You Qin-Zhong, Long Yun-Ze. Electrospun anisotropic architectures and porous structures for tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B. 2015;3:5389–5410. doi: 10.1039/c5tb00472a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Li Yan-Fang, Gregersen Hans, Nygaard Jens Vinge, Cheng Weilu, Yu Ying, Huang Yudong, Dong Mingdong, Besenbacher Flemming, Chen Menglin. Ultraporous nanofeatured PCL PEO microfibrous scaffolds enhance cell infiltration, colonization and myofibroblastic differentiation. Nanoscale. 2015;7:14989–14995. doi: 10.1039/c5nr04244e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Miller Kristin S, Khosravi Ramak, Breuer Christopher K, Humphrey Jay D. A hypothesis-driven parametric study of effects of polymeric scaffold properties on tissue engineered neovessel formation. Acta Biomaterialia. 2015;11:283–294. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kim Hye Sung, Yoo Hyuk Sang. Surface-polymerized biomimetic nanofibrils for the cell-directed association of 3-D scaffolds. Chem Commun. 2015;51:306–309. doi: 10.1039/c4cc06875k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hung Ben P, Huri Pinar Yilgor, Temple Joshua P, Dorafshar Amir, Grayson Warren L. Craniofacial Bone. :215–230. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rocco Kevin A, Maxfield Mark W, Best Cameron A, Dean Ethan W, Breuer Christopher K. In Vivo Applications of Electrospun Tissue-Engineered Vascular Grafts: A Review. Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews. 2014;20(6):628–640. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2014.0123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wright LD, McKeon-Fischer KD, Cui Z, Nair LS, Freeman JW. PDLA/PLLA and PDLA/PCL nanofibers with a chitosan-based hydrogel in composite scaffolds for tissue engineered cartilage. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. 2014;8:946–954. doi: 10.1002/term.v8.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Jin Gyuhyung, Lee Slgirim, Kim Seung-Hyun, Kim Minhee, Jang Jae-Hyung. Bicomponent electrospinning to fabricate three-dimensional hydrogel-hybrid nanofibrous scaffolds with spatial fiber tortuosity. Biomedical Microdevices. 2014;16:793–804. doi: 10.1007/s10544-014-9883-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wade Ryan J, Burdick Jason A. Advances in nanofibrous scaffolds for biomedical applications: From electrospinning to self-assembly. Nano Today. 2014;9:722–742. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Nukavarapu Syam, Kumbar Sangamesh, Merrell Jonathan, Laurencin Cato. Electrospun Polymeric Nanofiber Scaffolds for Tissue Regeneration. :229–254. [Google Scholar]
- 50.William Garrigues N, Little Dianne, Sanchez-Adams Johannah, Ruch David S, Guilak Farshid. Electrospun cartilage-derived matrix scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2014;102:3998–4008. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.v102.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Liu Shuqiong, He Zhihang, Xu Guojie, Xiao Xiufeng. Fabrication of polycaprolactone nanofibrous scaffolds by facile phase separation approach. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2014;44:201–208. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bonvallet Paul P, Culpepper Bonnie K, Bain Jennifer L, Schultz Matthew J, Thomas Steven J, Bellis Susan L. Microporous Dermal-Like Electrospun Scaffolds Promote Accelerated Skin Regeneration. Tissue Engineering Part A. 2014;20(17–18):2434–2445. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Domingues Rui MA, Gomes Manuela E, Reis Rui L. The Potential of Cellulose Nanocrystals in Tissue Engineering Strategies. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15:2327–2346. doi: 10.1021/bm500524s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Woods Ian, Flanagan Thomas C. Electrospinning of biomimetic scaffolds for tissue-engineered vascular grafts: threading the path. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy. 2014;12:815–832. doi: 10.1586/14779072.2014.925397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Jia Chao, Mahjour Seyed, Chan Lawrence, Hou Da-wei, Wang Hongjun. Biomimetic Design of Extracellular Matrix-Like Substrate for Tissue Regeneration. :199–230. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Castro Nathan, O’Brien Joseph, Zhang Lijie. Engineering Functional Bone Grafts for Craniofacial Regeneration. :589–620. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sun B, Long YZ, Zhang HD, Li MM, Duvail JL, Jiang XY, Yin HL. Advances in three-dimensional nanofibrous macrostructures via electrospinning. Progress in Polymer Science. 2014;39:862–890. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Wang Hongjun, Xu Meng. A Biomimetic Approach toward the Fabrication of Epithelial-like Tissue. :175–194. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ondeck Matthew G, Engler Adam J. Dynamic Materials Mimic Developmental and Disease Changes in Tissues. :25–43. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Tyler Nelson M, Pattanaik Lagnajit, Allen Marcia, Gerbich Matthew, Hux Kelvin, Allen Matthew, Lannutti John J. Recrystallization improves the mechanical properties of sintered electrospun polycaprolactone. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2014;30:150–158. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Haghi A, Zaikov G. Polymeric Nanosystems. :105–145. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Shabani Iman, Haddadi-Asl Vahid, Soleimani Masoud, Seyedjafari Ehsan, Hashemi Seyed Mahmoud. Ion-Exchange Polymer Nanofibers for Enhanced Osteogenic Differentiation of Stem Cells and Ectopic Bone Formation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2014;6:72–82. doi: 10.1021/am404500c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Xu Helan, Yang Yiqi. 3D Electrospun Fibrous Structures from Biopolymers. :103–126. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Rampichová Michala, Buzgo Matej, Chvojka Jiří, Prosecká Eva, Kofroňová Olga, Amler Evžen. Cell penetration to nanofibrous scaffolds. Cell Adhesion & Migration. 2014;8:36–41. doi: 10.4161/cam.27477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Simonet Marc, Stingelin Natalie, Wismans Joris GF, Oomens Cees WJ, Driessen-Mol Anita, Baaijens Frank PT. Tailoring the void space and mechanical properties in electrospun scaffolds towards physiological ranges. J Mater Chem B. 2014;2:305–313. doi: 10.1039/c3tb20995d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Li Song, Sengupta Debanti, Chien Shu. Vascular tissue engineering: from in vitro to in situ. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine. 2014;6:61–76. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.2014.6.issue-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Pilehrood Mohammad Kazemi, Dilamian Mandana, Mirian Mina, Sadeghi-Aliabadi Hojjat, Maleknia Laleh, Nousiainen Pertti, Harlin Ali. Nanofibrous Chitosan-Polyethylene Oxide Engineered Scaffolds: A Comparative Study between Simulated Structural Characteristics and Cells Viability. BioMed Research International. 2014;2014:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2014/438065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Jeong Sung In, Burns Nancy A, Bonino Christopher A, Kwon Il Keun, Khan Saad A, Alsberg Eben. Improved cell infiltration of highly porous 3D nanofibrous scaffolds formed by combined fiber fiber charge repulsions and ultrasonication. J Mater Chem B. 2014;2:8116–8122. doi: 10.1039/C4TB01487A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Li Longchao, Ge Juan, Wang Ling, Guo Baolin, Ma Peter X. Electroactive nanofibrous biomimetic scaffolds by thermally induced phase separation. Journal of Materials Chemistry B. 2014;2:6119. doi: 10.1039/c4tb00493k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Lee Hyeongjin, Jang Chul Ho, Kim Geun Hyung. A polycaprolactone/silk-fibroin nanofibrous composite combined with human umbilical cord serum for subacute tympanic membrane perforation; an in vitro and in vivo study. Journal of Materials Chemistry B. 2014;2:2703. doi: 10.1039/c4tb00213j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Chainani Abby, Hippensteel Kirk J, Kishan Alysha, William Garrigues N, Ruch David S, Guilak Farshid, Little Dianne. Multilayered Electrospun Scaffolds for Tendon Tissue Engineering. Tissue Engineering Part A. 2013;19(23–24):2594–2604. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Wang Kai, Xu Meng, Zhu Meifeng, Su Hong, Wang Hongjun, Kong Deling, Wang Lianyong. Creation of macropores in electrospun silk fibroin scaffolds using sacrificial PEO-microparticles to enhance cellular infiltration. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2013;101:3474–3481. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.v101.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Yuan Wenjie, Feng Yakai, Wang Heyun, Yang Dazhi, An Bo, Zhang Wencheng, Khan Musammir, Guo Jintang. Hemocompatible surface of electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds by ATRP modification. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2013;33:3644–3651. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.04.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Kane Robert J, Peter X. MaBiomimetic Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications. :69–89. [Google Scholar]
- 75.Liu Wenying, Thomopoulos Stavros, Xia Younan. Electrospun Nanofibers for Regenerative Medicine. :265–295. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201100021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Nguyen Luong TH, Chen Shilin, Elumalai Naveen K, Prabhakaran Molamma P, Zong Yun, Vijila Chellappan, Allakhverdiev Suleyman I, Ramakrishna Seeram. Biological, Chemical, and Electronic Applications of Nanofibers. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering. 2013;298:822–867. doi: 10.1002/mame.v298.8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Joshi Vaidehi S, Lei Nan Ye, Walthers Christopher M, Wu Benjamin, Dunn James CY. Macroporosity enhances vascularization of electrospun scaffolds. Journal of Surgical Research. 2013;183:18–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Hu Wei-Wen, Yu Hsing-Ning. Coelectrospinning of chitosan/alginate fibers by dual-jet system for modulating material surfaces. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2013;95:716–727. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.02.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Farrugia Brooke L, Brown Toby D, Upton Zee, Hutmacher Dietmar W, Dalton Paul D, Dargaville Tim R. Dermal fibroblast infiltration of poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds fabricated by melt electrospinning in a direct writing mode. Biofabrication. 2013;5:025001. doi: 10.1088/1758-5082/5/2/025001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Cheng Qian, Lee Benjamin L-P, Komvopoulos Kyriakos, Li Song. Engineering the Microstructure of Electrospun Fibrous Scaffolds by Microtopography. Biomacromolecules. 2013;14:1349–1360. doi: 10.1021/bm302000n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Wang Feng, Li Zhenqing, Guan Jianjun. Fabrication of mesenchymal stem cells-integrated vascular constructs mimicking multiple properties of the native blood vessels. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition. 2013;24:769–783. doi: 10.1080/09205063.2012.712029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Sreerekha Perumcherry Raman, Menon Deepthy, Nair Shantikumar V, Chennazhi Krishna Prasad. Fabrication of Electrospun Poly (Lactide-co-Glycolide) Fibrin Multiscale Scaffold for Myocardial Regeneration In Vitro. Tissue Engineering Part A. 2013;19(7–8):849–859. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2012.0374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Kim Hong Nam, Jiao Alex, Hwang Nathaniel S, Kim Min Sung, Kang Do Hyun, Kim Deok-Ho, Suh Kahp-Yang. Nanotopography-guided tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2013;65:536–558. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Bosworth Lucy A, Turner Lesley-Anne, Cartmell Sarah H. State of the art composites comprising electrospun fibres coupled with hydrogels: a review. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine. 2013;9:322–335. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2012.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Zander Nicole. Hierarchically Structured Electrospun Fibers. Polymers. 2013;5:19–44. [Google Scholar]
- 86.Li Huaqiong, Wong Yee Shan, Wen Feng, Ng Kee Woei, Ng Gary Ka Lai, Venkatraman Subbu S, Boey Freddy Yin Chiang, Tan Lay Poh. Human Mesenchymal Stem-Cell Behaviour On Direct Laser Micropatterned Electrospun Scaffolds with Hierarchical Structures. Macromolecular Bioscience. 2013;13:299–310. doi: 10.1002/mabi.201200318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Ionescu Lara C, Mauck Robert L. Porosity and Cell Preseeding Influence Electrospun Scaffold Maturation and Meniscus Integration In Vitro. Tissue Engineering Part A. 2013;19(3–4):538–547. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Rampichová M, Chvojka J, Buzgo M, Prosecká E, Mikeš P, Vysloužilová L, Tvrdík D, Kochová P, Gregor T, Lukáš D, Amler E. Elastic three-dimensional poly (ε-caprolactone) nanofibre scaffold enhances migration, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Proliferation. 2013;46:23–37. doi: 10.1111/cpr.12001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Rim Nae Gyune, Shin Choongsoo S, Shin Heungsoo. Current approaches to electrospun nanofibers for tissue engineering. Biomedical Materials. 2013;8:014102. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/8/1/014102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Vaquette Cédryck, Cooper-White Justin. A simple method for fabricating 3-D multilayered composite scaffolds. Acta Biomaterialia. 2013;9:4599–4608. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Zander Nicole E, Orlicki Joshua A, Rawlett Adam M, Beebe Thomas P. Electrospun polycaprolactone scaffolds with tailored porosity using two approaches for enhanced cellular infiltration. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2013;24:179–187. doi: 10.1007/s10856-012-4771-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Kai Dan, Jin Guorui, Prabhakaran Molamma P, Ramakrishna Seeram. Electrospun synthetic and natural nanofibers for regenerative medicine and stem cells. Biotechnology Journal. 2013;8:59–72. doi: 10.1002/biot.201200249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Walther Anja, Hoyer Birgit, Springer Armin, Mrozik Birgit, Hanke Thomas, Cherif Chokri, Pompe Wolfgang, Gelinsky Michael. Novel Textile Scaffolds Generated by Flock Technology for Tissue Engineering of Bone and Cartilage. Materials. 2012;5:540–557. doi: 10.3390/ma5030540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Izadifar Zohreh, Chen Xiongbiao, Kulyk William. Strategic Design and Fabrication of Engineered Scaffolds for Articular Cartilage Repair. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2012;3:799–838. doi: 10.3390/jfb3040799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Khadka Dhan B, Haynie Donald T. Protein- and peptide-based electrospun nanofibers in medical biomaterials. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine. 2012;8:1242–1262. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2012.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Wade Ryan J, Burdick Jason A. Engineering ECM signals into biomaterials. Materials Today. 2012;15:454–459. [Google Scholar]
- 97.Lee Jongman, Yoo James J, Atala Anthony, Lee Sang Jin. The effect of controlled release of PDGF-BB from heparin-conjugated electrospun PCL/gelatin scaffolds on cellular bioactivity and infiltration. Biomaterials. 2012;33:6709–6720. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Leung Linus H, Naguib Hani. Novel fabrication technique for three-dimensional micropatterned electrospun poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) acid. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2012;125:E61–E70. [Google Scholar]
- 99.Schofer Markus D, Tünnermann Lisa, Kaiser Hendric, Roessler Philip P, Theisen Christina, Heverhagen Johannes T, Hering Jacqueline, Voelker Maximilian, Agarwal Seema, Efe Turgay, Fuchs-Winkelmann Susanne, Paletta Jürgen RJ. Functionalisation of PLLA nanofiber scaffolds using a possible cooperative effect between collagen type I and BMP-2: impact on colonization and bone formation in vivo. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2012;23:2227–2233. doi: 10.1007/s10856-012-4697-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Zhang Zhanpeng, Hu Jiang, Ma Peter X. Nanofiber-based delivery of bioactive agents and stem cells to bone sites. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2012;64:1129–1141. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Hu Jin-Jia, Chao Wei-Chih, Lee Pei-Yuan, Huang Chih-Hao. Construction and characterization of an electrospun tubular scaffold for small-diameter tissue-engineered vascular grafts: A scaffold membrane approach. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2012;13:140–155. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Kim Mihye, Hong Bohee, Lee Jongman, Kim Se Eun, Kang Seong Soo, Kim Young Ha, Tae Giyoong. Composite System of PLCL Scaffold and Heparin-Based Hydrogel for Regeneration of Partial-Thickness Cartilage Defects. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13:2287–2298. doi: 10.1021/bm3005353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Kang Jae Kyeong, Lee Mi Hee, Kwon Byeong Ju, Kim Hak Hee, Shim In Kyong, Jung Mi Ra, Lee Seung Jin, Park Jong-Chul. Effective layer by layer cell seeding into non-woven 3D electrospun scaffolds of poly-L-lactic acid microfibers for uniform tissue formation. Macromolecular Research. 2012;20:795–799. [Google Scholar]
- 104.Lee Benjamin Li-Ping, Jeon Hojeong, Wang Aijun, Yan Zhiqiang, Yu Jian, Grigoropoulos Costas, Li Song. Femtosecond laser ablation enhances cell infiltration into three-dimensional electrospun scaffolds. Acta Biomaterialia. 2012;8:2648–2658. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.04.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Lee Bit Na, Kim Da Yeon, Kang Hwi Ju, Kwon Jin Seon, Park Young Hwan, Chun Heung Jae, Kim Jae Ho, Lee Hai Bang, Min Byoung Hyun, Kim Moon Suk. In vivo biofunctionality comparison of different topographic PLLA scaffolds. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2012;100A:1751–1760. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.v100a.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Bottino Marco C, Thomas Vinoy, Schmidt Gudrun, Vohra Yogesh K, Chu Tien-Min Gabriel, Kowolik Michael J, Janowski Gregg M. Recent advances in the development of GTR/GBR membranes for periodontal regeneration A materials perspective. Dental Materials. 2012;28:703–721. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Coburn JM, Gibson M, Monagle S, Patterson Z, Elisseeff JH. Bioinspired nanofibers support chondrogenesis for articular cartilage repair. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109:10012–10017. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1121605109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Wang Heyun, Feng Yakai, An Bo, Zhang Wencheng, Sun Minglin, Fang Zichen, Yuan Wenjie, Khan Massuri. Fabrication of PU/PEGMA crosslinked hybrid scaffolds by in situ UV photopolymerization favoring human endothelial cells growth for vascular tissue engineering. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2012;23:1499–1510. doi: 10.1007/s10856-012-4613-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Shabani Iman, Haddadi-Asl Vahid, Seyedjafari Ehsan, Soleimani Masoud. Cellular infiltration on nanofibrous scaffolds using a modified electrospinning technique. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2012;423(1):50–54. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.05.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Mickova Andrea, Buzgo Matej, Benada Oldrich, Rampichova Michala, Fisar Zdenek, Filova Eva, Tesarova Martina, Lukas David, Amler Evzen. Core/Shell Nanofibers with Embedded Liposomes as a Drug Delivery System. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13:952–962. doi: 10.1021/bm2018118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Thomas Vinoy, Vohra Yogesh K. Functionally-Graded Biomimetic Vascular Grafts for Enhanced Tissue Regeneration and Bio-integration. :235–273. [Google Scholar]
- 112.Zhong Shaoping, Zhang Yanzhong, Lim Chwee Teck. Fabrication of Large Pores in Electrospun Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Cellular Infiltration: A Review. Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews. 2012;18(2):77–87. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2011.0390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Li Linhao, Qian Yuna, Jiang Chao, Lv Yonggang, Liu Wanqian, Zhong Li, Cai Kaiyong, Li Song, Yang Li. The use of hyaluronan to regulate protein adsorption and cell infiltration in nanofibrous scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2012;33:3428–3445. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Lee Sang, Yoo James. Guidance of Cell Adhesion, Alignment, Infiltration and Differentiation on Electrospun Nanofibrous Scaffolds. :201–217. [Google Scholar]
- 115.Leung Linus H, Fan Stephanie, Naguib Hani E. Fabrication of 3D electrospun structures from poly(lactide-co-glycolide acid)-nano-hydroxyapatite composites. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics. 2012;50:242–249. [Google Scholar]
- 116.Liu Wenying, Thomopoulos Stavros, Xia Younan. Electrospun Nanofibers for Regenerative Medicine. Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2012;1:10–25. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201100021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.McClure Michael J, Wolfe Patricia S, Simpson David G, Sell Scott A, Bowlin Gary L. The use of air-flow impedance to control fiber deposition patterns during electrospinning. Biomaterials. 2012;33:771–779. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Phipps Matthew C, Clem William C, Grunda Jessica M, Clines Gregory A, Bellis Susan L. Increasing the pore sizes of bone-mimetic electrospun scaffolds comprised of polycaprolactone, collagen I and hydroxyapatite to enhance cell infiltration. Biomaterials. 2012;33:524–534. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Hakamada Yoshihiro, Ohgushi Nao, Fujimura-Kondo Nozomi, Matsuda Takehisa. Electrospun Poly(γ-Benzyl-L-Glutamate) and Its Alkali-Treated Meshes: Their Water Wettability and Cell-Adhesion Potential. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition. 2012;23:1055–1067. doi: 10.1163/092050611X572057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Diban Nazely, Stamatialis Dimitrios F. Functional Polymer Scaffolds for Blood Vessel Tissue Engineering. Macromolecular Symposia. 2011;309–310:93–99. [Google Scholar]
- 121.McCullen SD, Gittard SD, Miller PR, Pourdeyhimi Behnam, Narayan RJ, Loboa EG. Laser Ablation Imparts Controlled Micro-Scale Pores in Electrospun Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2011;39:3021–3030. doi: 10.1007/s10439-011-0378-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Lee Carol H, Lim Yong C, Farson Dave F, Powell Heather M, Lannutti John J. Vascular Wall Engineering Via Femtosecond Laser Ablation: Scaffolds with Self-Containing Smooth Muscle Cell Populations. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2011;39:3031–3041. doi: 10.1007/s10439-011-0417-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Lee Jung Bok, Jeong Sung In, Bae Min Soo, Yang Dae Hyeok, Heo Dong Nyoung, Kim Chun Ho, Alsberg Eben, Kwon Il Keun. Highly Porous Electrospun Nanofibers Enhanced by Ultrasonication for Improved Cellular Infiltration. Tissue Engineering Part A. 2011;17(21–22):2695–2702. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Rnjak-Kovacina Jelena, Weiss Anthony S. Increasing the Pore Size of Electrospun Scaffolds. Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews. 2011;17(5):365–372. doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2011.0235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Dahlin Rebecca L, Kurtis Kasper F, Mikos Antonios G. Polymeric Nanofibers in Tissue Engineering. Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews. 2011;17(5):349–364. doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2011.0238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Rnjak-Kovacina Jelena, Wise Steven G, Li Zhe, Maitz Peter KM, Young Cara J, Wang Yiwei, Weiss Anthony S. Tailoring the porosity and pore size of electrospun synthetic human elastin scaffolds for dermal tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2011;32:6729–6736. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Skotak Maciej, Ragusa Jorge, Gonzalez Daniela, Subramanian Anuradha. Improved cellular infiltration into nanofibrous electrospun cross-linked gelatin scaffolds templated with micrometer-sized polyethylene glycol fibers. Biomedical Materials. 2011;6:055012. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/6/5/055012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Kinikoglu Beste, Rodríguez-Cabello José Carlos, Damour Odile, Hasirci Vasif. The influence of elastin-like recombinant polymer on the self-renewing potential of a 3D tissue equivalent derived from human lamina propria fibroblasts and oral epithelial cells. Biomaterials. 2011;32:5756–5764. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.04.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Guan Jianjun, Wang Feng, Li Zhenqing, Chen Joseph, Guo Xiaolei, Liao Jun, Moldovan Nicanor I. The stimulation of the cardiac differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in tissue constructs that mimic myocardium structure and biomechanics. Biomaterials. 2011;32:5568–5580. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.04.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Sundararaghavan Harini G, Burdick Jason A. Gradients with Depth in Electrospun Fibrous Scaffolds for Directed Cell Behavior. Biomacromolecules. 2011;12:2344–2350. doi: 10.1021/bm200415g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Lee Wen-Yu, Cheng Wei-Yuan, Yeh Yi-Chun, Lai Chih-Huang, Hwang Shiaw-Min, Hsiao Chun-Wen, Huang Chia-Wen, Chen Mei-Chin, Sung Hsing-Wen. Magnetically Directed Self-Assembly of Electrospun Superparamagnetic Fibrous Bundles to Form Three-Dimensional Tissues with a Highly Ordered Architecture. Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods. 2011;17(6):651–661. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2010.0621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Vaquette Cedryck, Cooper-White Justin John. Increasing electrospun scaffold pore size with tailored collectors for improved cell penetration. Acta Biomaterialia. 2011;7:2544–2557. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Shabani Iman, Haddadi-Asl Vahid, Soleimani Masoud, Seyedjafari Ehsan, Babaeijandaghi Farshad, Ahmadbeigi Naser. Enhanced Infiltration and Biomineralization of Stem Cells on Collagen-Grafted Three-Dimensional Nanofibers. Tissue Engineering Part A. 2011;17:9–10. 1209–1218. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Rivet CJ, Gilbert RJ. Fabrication and characterization of a hydrogel containing electrospun fibers. :1–2. [Google Scholar]
- 135.Nam Jin, Johnson Jed, Lannutti John J, Agarwal Sudha. Modulation of embryonic mesenchymal progenitor cell differentiation via control over pure mechanical modulus in electrospun nanofibers. Acta Biomaterialia. 2011;7:1516–1524. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Szentivanyi Andreas, Chakradeo Tanmay, Zernetsch Holger, Glasmacher Birgit. Electrospun cellular microenvironments: Understanding controlled release and scaffold structure. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2011;63:209–220. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2010.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.McCullen Seth, Miller Philip, Gittard Shaun, Pourdeyhimi Behnam, Gorga Russell, Narayan Roger, Loboa Elizabeth. In situ collagen polymerization of layered cell-seeded electrospun scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications. Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods. 2011;26 doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2009.0753. 110306233140095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Whited Bryce M, Whitney Jon R, Hofmann Matthias C, Xu Yong, Rylander Marissa N. Pre-osteoblast infiltration and differentiation in highly porous apatite-coated PLLA electrospun scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2011;32:2294–2304. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Nerurkar Nandan L, Sen Sounok, Baker Brendon M, Elliott Dawn M, Mauck Robert L. Dynamic culture enhances stem cell infiltration and modulates extracellular matrix production on aligned electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds. Acta Biomaterialia. 2011;7:485–491. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.08.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Teo Wee-Eong, Inai Ryuji, Ramakrishna Seeram. Technological advances in electrospinning of nanofibers. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials. 2011;12:013002. doi: 10.1088/1468-6996/12/1/11660944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Rebollar Esther, Cordero Diego, Martins Albino, Chiussi Stefano, Reis Rui L, Neves Nuno M, León Betty. Improvement of electrospun polymer fiber meshes pore size by femtosecond laser irradiation. Applied Surface Science. 2011;257:4091–4095. [Google Scholar]
- 142.Szot Christopher S, Buchanan Cara F, Gatenholm Paul, Rylander Marissa Nichole, Freeman Joseph W. Investigation of cancer cell behavior on nanofibrous scaffolds. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2011;31:37–42. [Google Scholar]
- 143.Meade K, Holley RJ, Merry CLR. Cell culture systems for stem cell research. :372–396. [Google Scholar]
- 144.Wright LD, Andric T, Freeman JW. Utilizing NaCl to increase the porosity of electrospun materials. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2011;31:30–36. [Google Scholar]
- 145.Simonet M, Driessen-Mol A, Baaijens FPT, Bouten CVC. Heart valve tissue regeneration. :202–224. [Google Scholar]
- 146.Mouthuy P-A, Ye H. Biomaterials. :23–36. [Google Scholar]
- 147.Hardingham T. Cartilage tissue regeneration. :111–126. [Google Scholar]
- 148.McCullen Seth D, Miller Philip R, Gittard Shaun D, Gorga Russell E, Pourdeyhimi Behnam, Narayan Roger J, Loboa Elizabeth G. In Situ Collagen Polymerization of Layered Cell-Seeded Electrospun Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications. Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods. 2010;16(5):1095–1105. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2009.0753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Singelyn Jennifer M, Christman Karen L. Injectable Materials for the Treatment of Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure: The Promise of Decellularized Matrices. Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research. 2010;3:478–486. doi: 10.1007/s12265-010-9202-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Wright LD, Young RT, Andric T, Freeman JW. Fabrication and mechanical characterization of 3D electrospun scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomedical Materials. 2010;5:055006. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/5/5/055006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Weber N, Lee Y-S, Shanmugasundaram S, Jaffe M, Arinzeh TL. Characterization and in vitro cytocompatibility of piezoelectric electrospun scaffolds. Acta Biomaterialia. 2010;6:3550–3556. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.03.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Ruckh Timothy T, Kumar Kuldeep, Kipper Matt J, Popat Ketul C. Osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells on poly(ε-caprolactone) nanofiber scaffolds. Acta Biomaterialia. 2010;6:2949–2959. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Stella John A, D’Amore Antonio, Wagner William R, Sacks Michael S. On the biomechanical function of scaffolds for engineering load-bearing soft tissues. Acta Biomaterialia. 2010;6:2365–2381. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Seif-Naraghi Sonya B, Salvatore Michael A, Schup-Magoffin Pam J, Hu Diane P, Christman Karen L. Design and Characterization of an Injectable Pericardial Matrix Gel: A Potentially Autologous Scaffold for Cardiac Tissue Engineering. Tissue Engineering Part A. 2010;16(6):2017–2027. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Guimarães Ana, Martins Albino, Pinho Elisabete D, Faria Susana, Reis Rui L, Neves Nuno M. Solving cell infiltration limitations of electrospun nanofiber meshes for tissue engineering applications. Nanomedicine. 2010;5:539–554. doi: 10.2217/nnm.10.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Bhardwaj Nandana, Kundu Subhas C. Electrospinning: A fascinating fiber fabrication technique. Biotechnology Advances. 2010;28:325–347. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Kurpinski Kyle T, Stephenson Jacob T, Janairo Randall Raphael R, Lee Hanmin, Li Song. The effect of fiber alignment and heparin coating on cell infiltration into nanofibrous PLLA scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2010;31:3536–3542. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Ju Young Min, Choi Jin San, Atala Anthony, Yoo James J, Lee Sang Jin. Bilayered scaffold for engineering cellularized blood vessels. Biomaterials. 2010;31:4313–4321. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Sundararaghavan Harini G, Metter Robert B, Burdick Jason A. Electrospun Fibrous Scaffolds with Multiscale and Photopatterned Porosity. Macromolecular Bioscience. 2010;10:265–270. doi: 10.1002/mabi.v10:3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Kim Sung Jin, Jang Da Hyun, Park Won Ho, Min Byung-Moo. Fabrication and characterization of 3-dimensional PLGA nanofiber/microfiber composite scaffolds. Polymer. 2010;51:1320–1327. [Google Scholar]
- 161.Gentsch Rafael, Boysen Bjoern, Lankenau Andreas, Börner Hans G. Single-Step Electrospinning of Bimodal Fiber Meshes for Ease of Cellular Infiltration. Macromolecular Rapid Communications. 2010;31:59–64. doi: 10.1002/marc.v31:1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Wulkersdorfer B, Kao KK, Agopian VG, Ahn A, Dunn JC, Wu BM, Stelzner M. Bimodal Porous Scaffolds by Sequential Electrospinning of Poly(glycolic acid) with Sucrose Particles. International Journal of Polymer Science. 2010;2010:1–9. [Google Scholar]
- 163.Sisson Kristin, Zhang Chu, Farach-Carson Mary C, Bruce Chase D, Rabolt John F. Fiber diameters control osteoblastic cell migration and differentiation in electrospun gelatin. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2010 doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32756. n/a-n/a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Huang Yi-You, Wang De-Yao, Chang Lee-Lee, Yang Ying-Chi. Fabricating Microparticles/Nanofibers Composite and Nanofiber Scaffold with Controllable Pore Size by Rotating Multichannel Electrospinning. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition. 2010;21:1503–1514. doi: 10.1163/092050609X12519805625997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Patlolla A, Collins G, Livingston Arinzeh T. Solvent-dependent properties of electrospun fibrous composites for bone tissue regeneration. Acta Biomaterialia. 2010;6:90–101. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.07.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Veleva AN, Heath DE, Johnson JK, Nam J, Patterson C, Lannutti JJ, Cooper SL. Interactions between endothelial cells and electrospun methacrylic terpolymer fibers for engineered vascular replacements. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2009;91A:1131–1139. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.v91a:4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Jed Johnson M, Nowicki Oskar, Lee Carol H, Antonio Chiocca E, Viapiano Mariano S, Lawler Sean E, Lannutti John J. Quantitative Analysis of Complex Glioma Cell Migration on Electrospun Polycaprolactone Using Time-Lapse Microscopy. Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods. 2009;15(4):531–540. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2008.0486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Jang Jun-Hyeog, Castano Oscar, Kim Hae-Won. Electrospun materials as potential platforms for bone tissue engineering. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2009;61:1065–1083. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2009.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Baker Brendon M, Handorf Andrew M, Ionescu Lara C, Li Wan-Ju, Mauck Robert L. New directions in nanofibrous scaffolds for soft tissue engineering and regeneration. Expert Review of Medical Devices. 2009;6:515–532. doi: 10.1586/erd.09.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Zucchelli A, Fabiani D, Gualandi C, Focarete ML. An innovative and versatile approach to design highly porous, patterned, nanofibrous polymeric materials. Journal of Materials Science. 2009;44:4969–4975. [Google Scholar]
- 171.Mauck Robert L, Baker Brendon M, Nerurkar Nandan L, Burdick Jason A, Li Wan-Ju, Tuan Rocky S, Elliott Dawn M. Engineering on the Straight and Narrow: The Mechanics of Nanofibrous Assemblies for Fiber-Reinforced Tissue Regeneration. Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews. 2009;15(2):171–193. doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2008.0652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Zhang Kai, Wang Xuefen, Jing Dazheng, Yang Yin, Zhu Meifang. Bionic electrospun ultrafine fibrous poly(L-lactic acid) scaffolds with a multi-scale structure. Biomedical Materials. 2009;4:035004. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/4/3/035004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Shabani Iman, Haddadi-Asl Vahid, Seyedjafari Ehsan, Babaeijandaghi Farshad, Soleimani Masoud. Improved infiltration of stem cells on electrospun nanofibers. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2009;382:129–133. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.02.150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Drilling Sarah, Gaumer Jeremy, Lannutti John. Fabrication of burst pressure competent vascular grafts via electrospinning: Effects of microstructure. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 2009;88A:923–934. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.v88a:4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Nam Jin, Rath Bjoern, Knobloch Thomas J, Lannutti John J, Agarwal Sudha. Novel Electrospun Scaffolds for the Molecular Analysis of Chondrocytes Under Dynamic Compression. Tissue Engineering Part A. 2009;15(3):513–523. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2007.0353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Baker BM, Nathan AS, Russell Huffman G, Mauck RL. Tissue engineering with meniscus cells derived from surgical debris. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2009;17:336–345. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2008.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Yow SZ, Quek CH, Yim Evelyn KF, Lim CT, Leong KW. Collagen-based fibrous scaffold for spatial organization of encapsulated and seeded human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials. 2009;30:1133–1142. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Tzezana Roey, Zussman Eyal, Levenberg Shulamit. A Layered Ultra-Porous Scaffold for Tissue Engineering, Created via a Hydrospinning Method. Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods. 2008;14(4):281–288. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2008.0201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Yixiang Dong, Yong Thomas, Liao Susan, Chan Casey K, Ramakrishna S. Degradation of Electrospun Nanofiber Scaffold by Short Wave Length Ultraviolet Radiation Treatment and Its Potential Applications in Tissue Engineering. Tissue Engineering Part A. 2008;14(8):1321–1329. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2007.0395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Baker Brendon M, Gee Albert O, Metter Robert B, Nathan Ashwin S, Marklein Ross A, Burdick Jason A, Mauck Robert L. The potential to improve cell infiltration in composite fiber-aligned electrospun scaffolds by the selective removal of sacrificial fibers. Biomaterials. 2008;29:2348–2358. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.01.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Rath Bjoern, Nam Jin, Knobloch Thomas J, Lannutti John J, Agarwal Sudha. Compressive forces induce osteogenic gene expression in calvarial osteoblasts. Journal of Biomechanics. 2008;41:1095–1103. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.11.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Martins Albino, Araújo José V, Reis Rui L, Neves Nuno M. Electrospun nanostructured scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Nanomedicine. 2007;2:929–942. doi: 10.2217/17435889.2.6.929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Allee Tyler, Handorf Andrew, Wan-Ju LiElectrospinning. :48–78. [Google Scholar]