Abstract
Objective
To explore the feasibility of an endoscopic endonasal transclival approach to treat aneurysms arising in the basilar apex, posterior cerebral arteries, and superior cerebellar arteries.
Study Design
Cadaveric anatomical study.
Participants
Fifteen cadaveric specimens.
Main Outcome Measures
Degree of surgical exposure of each artery attained, distance from the nasal vestibule to these three arteries, and feasibility of clipping these vessels using standard vascular clip applicators.
Results
Both posterior cerebral arteries were exposed, 0.67 cm (standard deviation [SD]: 0.2) on the right side and 0.59 cm (SD: 0.2) on the left side. Both right and left superior cerebral arteries were exposed, 0.6 cm (SD: 0.2) and 0.7 cm (SD: 0.3), respectively. The length of the basilar artery exposed was 2.6 cm (SD: 0.3). The distance from the nasal vestibule to the posterior cerebral artery, superior cerebellar artery, and basilar apex was 10 cm with an SD of ± 0.7, 0.6, and 0.8 cm, respectively. We were able to apply clips on each of these three vessels with a minimal alteration of surrounding normal tissue.
Conclusion
The endoscopic endonasal transclival approach represents a potentially feasible surgical corridor to treat aneurysms arising from these vessels.
Keywords: endoscopic endonasal approach, clipping aneurysms, posterior cerebral artery aneurysms, basilar apex aneurysm, superior cerebellar aneurysm
Introduction
Since the initiation of endoscopic skull base surgery, this innovative technique has evolved over time. Initially, endoscopic skull base surgery was restricted to the approach of the pituitary fossa, but with the advent of new technology, neuronavigation systems, and improved anatomical understanding, we are now able to reach areas that were previously not amenable to treatment through an endonasal technique. From the cribriform plate down to the odontoid process of C2, the expanded endoscopic approach has given us great exposure and visualization of all the structures within this area while avoiding brain retraction and manipulation of some neurovascular structures. The structures that we can access and visualize with this approach are the basilar apex (BA), superior cerebellar artery, and posterior cerebral artery.
Additionally, new reconstruction techniques have been developed to avoid postoperative complications such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. For many years this condition was rated as the major disadvantage of endoscopic endonasal approaches. The new techniques include vascularized nasoseptal flaps and secondary flaps. Studies reported a successful reconstruction rate of CSF leakage with the nasoseptal flap of > 94%1 in patients with high-flow defects. Secondary flaps also showed excellent results with a successful reconstruction rate of 97% comparable with the results of the nasoseptal flap alone.2 This surgical corridor and new options of reconstruction after surgery make the expanded endonasal approach an excellent option to treat pathologies in the midline skull base potentially including the BA, posterior cerebral artery, and superior cerebellar artery aneurysms. We present an anatomical study exploring the feasibility of an endoscopic endonasal transclival approach to treat aneurysms arising in these three main vessels.
Methods
Fifteen latex-injected adult cadaver heads were dissected using the endoscopic endonasal transclival approach. Endoscopic dissections were performed at the North Carolina Eye Bank Multidisciplinary Surgical Skills Laboratory at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. A rigid endoscope 4 mm in diameter, 18 cm in length, with 0-degree lenses (Karl Storz Endoscopy, Tuttlingen, Germany) connected to a light source was used. We were able to take pictures and videos during the entire procedure.
We first performed a standard endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to the sellar region. Once the sphenoid cavity was completely exposed, the basopharyngeal fascia was removed completely from the floor of the sphenoid and the clival face. Drilling of the sphenoid floor was achieved until it was flush with the clivus, allowing the union of its sphenoidal and rhinopharyngeal portions. The clivus was removed completely; the eustachian tubes marked the lateral limits. The underlying dura mater was exposed and opened. Posteriorly, with a 10-cm flexible surgical ruler (Kendall, Covidien, Mansfield, Massachusetts, United States), we measured the distance from the nasal vestibule to the BA, posterior cerebral artery, and superior cerebellar artery as well as the length exposed of each of them. Finally, using standard aneurysm clips (Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany) and clip appliers (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany), we clipped these three vessels in different portions of the length exposed.
Results
With the method just described we were able to expose the basilar artery in all of its extension, focusing primarily on the BA, the posterior cerebral artery segments p1 and p2, and the superior cerebellar artery (Fig. 1). The average length for the posterior cerebral artery exposed was 0.67 ± 0.2 cm on the right side and 0.59 ± 0.2 cm on the left side. Both right and left superior cerebellar arteries were exposed with an average length of 0.6 ± 0.2 cm and 0.7 ± 0.3 cm, respectively. We identified cranial nerve (CN) III running between the posterior cerebral and superior cerebellar arteries in all specimens, and we were able to avoid manipulation of this nerve when applying the clips. The length of the basilar artery exposed was 2.6 ± 0.3 cm on average. The distance from the nasal vestibule to the posterior cerebral artery, superior cerebellar artery, and BA was ∼ 10 cm with an SD of ± 0.7, 0.6, and 0.8 cm, respectively. We were able to place clips in the posterior cerebral artery, superior cerebellar artery, and BA using the standard clip applicators in different portions of the length exposed in each artery with minimal alteration of surrounding normal tissue in all the specimens (Figs. 2 and 3; Video 1).
Fig. 1.

Endoscopic view obtained in a cadaver showing basilar apex. CN, cranial nerve III; PCA, posterior cerebral arteries; SCA, superior cerebellar arteries.
Fig. 2.

Endoscopic view obtained in a cadaver showing the technique used to measure the basilar apex, superior cerebellar artery, and posterior cerebral artery. Measurement of the superior cerebellar artery is shown.
Fig. 3.

Endoscopic view showing clip placement. (A) Basilar artery. (B) Posterior cerebral artery. (C) Superior cerebellar artery.
Video 1
Endoscopic video showing the technique used to clip the posterior cerebellar artery and basilar artery. Online content including video sequence is available at: https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/s-0035-1566252.
Discussion and Literature Review
BA aneurysms are the most commonly reported in the posterior cerebral arterial circulation, accounting for 50%3 4 of all posterior circulation aneurysms. BA aneurysms are associated with higher risk of bleeding, mortality, and morbidity compared with those seen in other posterior circulation locations.4
Different variations of the anatomy of BA aneurysms have been described. Nanda et al5 designated and reported in his clinical series the complex anatomy of a BA aneurysm in which criteria included an aneurysm > 10 cm, calcified or thrombosed, neck ≥ 4 mm (up to 60% of all BA aneurysms),4 posterior direction, and retro/subsellar aneurysms. Aneurysms that did not have these criteria were considered simple aneurysms. In addition to the posterior projection, the anterior projection, toward the dorsum sellae, and the upward projection, toward the posterior diencephalon, have also been described.3 6 A great proportion of BA aneurysms are associated with posterior cerebral and superior cerebellar aneurysms. The sum of all of these features makes this pathology one of the most difficult to treat with surgery and endovascular interventions.
Posterior cerebral artery aneurysms have a lower incidence of occurrence compared with BA aneurysms. They represent only 1% of all intracranial aneurysms.7 Due to the many perforating branches that originate in the posterior cerebral artery, and the different anatomical territories that it supplies, an excellent knowledge of the posterior cerebral artery anatomy is necessary. P1 and P2 segments of the posterior cerebral artery are the locations most often reported in the literature7 8 9 10 that we were able to expose with the endonasal endoscopic approach. In patients without an antecedent of a subarachnoid hemorrhage, having an aneurysm located in the posterior cerebral artery represents an independent higher risk of rupture, as reported in the study of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in 1998.11 These features increase the risk of morbidity and mortality related to this pathology.
Superior cerebellar artery aneurysms are rare. Few clinical series have been reported.12 13 They arise mainly at the origin of the superior cerebral artery from the basilar artery or between the origin of the superior cerebral and posterior cerebral arteries.4 13 Compared with BA and posterior cerebral aneurysms, the size of superior cerebellar artery aneurysms are smaller, and they often present with a narrow neck. Additionally, inclusion of the artery origin into the aneurysm has been seen. No other morphological features have been described.
Different surgical approaches and endovascular interventions have been used and reported for the management of these aneurysms. The most common approaches used to reach the BA, superior cerebellar artery, and posterior cerebral artery have been the subtemporal approach and the pterional approach. The view of the aneurysm neck is perpendicular and shorter with the subtemporal approach; also there is no need to retract the great vessels, but there is a need to manipulate the third cranial nerve and temporal lobe.3 5 14 The pterional approach widens the distance between the internal carotid artery and the third cranial nerve that avoids manipulation of the latter, but the oblique direction of the approach affects the visibility of the vessels in question, and it is associated with a longer working distance and the manipulation of the posterior clinoid process. Other approaches has been used less frequently: the transcavernous approach with posterior clinoidectomy, middle fossa approach with medial petrosectomy, orbitozygomatic craniotomy, and transsylvian approach,15 all of them trying to increase the range of visibility, improve the ability of sharp dissection, avoid damage of the perforating vessels, and decrease manipulation of CN III. None of these approaches sufficiently negates the associated risks of the procedure. Additionally all the approaches just described involve significant brain retraction.
After the release of the detachable coil device in 1990, the decision regarding which technique, either endovascular or surgery, would bring better outcomes became more complex. The International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial16 in 2002 assessed the outcomes in patients with a ruptured aneurysm after the treatment either with endovascular coiling or surgical clipping. The trial showed better outcomes in terms of survival disability free after 1 year of treatment with endovascular treatment compared with neurosurgical treatment. Endovascular techniques in a posterior circulation aneurysm, mainly BA, have showed excellent results for small and narrow neck (< 4 mm) aneurysms,5 but with wide neck aneurysms, the risks of coil prolapse4 and the incomplete occlusion of larger aneurysms increase. Different techniques to avoid coil prolapse have been reported such as the use of stent-assisted coiling.17 For a large BA aneurysm, the occlusion rates with endovascular treatment ranged between 7.6% and 67%.5
Posterior cerebral artery aneurysms have shown good results when treated with endovascular coiling.7 Berry aneurysms in nature were the ones with better outcomes, but giant or fusiform type aneurysms presented the same problem as wide neck BA aneurysms, mainly for incomplete occlusion.7 In these cases, the occlusion of the parent vessel is sometimes inevitable.
Superior cerebellar aneurysms have been treated mainly with endovascular coiling; the cases reported presented incomplete occlusion of the aneurysm in the majority. These results12 can be explained when considering the aneurysm size-to-neck ratio and the inclusion of the parent artery origin into the aneurysm. In the first case the complete occlusion could lead to a prolapse of the coil to the parent vessel; in the second, the complete occlusion of the aneurysm would be impossible.12 Despite this, the endovascular treatment has shown positive long-term results.
In our study we wanted to investigate the feasibility of the endoscopic endonasal technique as a new window to treat this pathology. There are only nine cases18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 reported in the literature that have used this technique for clipping aneurysms, and of these, only four cases are located in the posterior circulation (Table 1). Two cases presented aneurysms in the basilar trunk18 19 and the other two in the right vertebral artery.20 23 There are no cases reporting the use of this technique in the BA, posterior cerebral artery, or superior cerebellar artery. All the cases reported had successful results. Kassam et al23 presented a patient with a right vertebral artery aneurysm previously treated with endovascular coiling; in this case the need for a subsequent treatment performed by the author was due to the mass effect caused by the coiling mass responsible for new symptomatology. Fewer complications were seen, and all were successfully treated. As in our study this technique represented a direct route to treat posterior circulation aneurysms, also one to avoid brain retraction and extensive manipulation of the surrounding neurovascular structures. The surgical corridor was found to be adequate for visualization and for standard clip applicators to reach the three vessels studied; however, new instruments designed specifically for this purpose must be developed. We believe the expanded endoscopic approach is a potential alternative to treat posterior cerebral, superior cerebellar, and BA artery aneurysms.
Table 1. Cases reported in the literature of posterior circulation aneurysms treated with endoscopic endonasal approach.
| Study | Age, y/Sex | Initial symptoms/Findings | Location/size | Approach | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kassam et al 23 | 51/W | Progressive clumsiness, weakness, headache, neck pain, sensory alterations, incoordination | Partially thrombosed, right vertebral artery aneurysm, 11 mm | First: Endovascular therapy successful but mass effect. Second: Clipping and aneurysmorrhaphy through a transclival transcondylar approach |
Excellent healing; improvement of preoperative symptoms; no CSF leakage |
| Eloy et al 19 | 28/W | HH grade III subarachnoid hemorrhage | Basilar trunk aneurysm, 2.5 × 2.2 × 1.7 mm | Extended sublabial approach to the sella and sphenoid | Stable; presented vasospasm that required antihypertensive treatment; it was necessary to place a stent for persistent fusiform dilation; patient's poststenting course was unremarkable |
| Enseñat et al 20 | 74/W | Sudden onset of severe headache, decreased level of consciousness, spatial and time disorientation, subarachnoid hemorrhage | Right vertebral artery saccular aneurysm, 1.2 mm | Extended endonasal transclival approach | Postoperative course uneventful; complete obliteration and patency of vertebral and PICA arteries CSF leakage 2 wk after surgery completely repaired |
| Drazin et al 18 | 59/W | Sudden onset of severe headache; subarachnoid hemorrhage HH grade II | Upper basilar artery with an associated feeding vessel to a small cerebellar hemisphere AVM | First: Endovascular treatment. Placement of stent unsuccessful. Second: Clipping trough a suboccipital craniotomy unsuccessful. Third: Extended endonasal transclival approach |
Partial occlusion of the aneurysm and continued filling of the AVM vessel. Returned to the OR, for reclipping that resulted in immediate occlusion and full recovery |
Abbreviations: AVM, arteriovenous malformation; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; HH, Hunt and Hess (scale); OR, operating room; PICA, posteroinferior cerebellar artery.
Conclusions
The endoscopic endonasal transclival approach represents a direct anatomical route to the posterior cerebral artery, superior cerebellar artery origin, and basilar artery apex. We believe this approach is a feasible surgical corridor to treat aneurysms arising in these vessels through the use of standard vascular clip applicators without the need for excessive brain retraction and manipulation, thus adding an alternative treatment to the armamentarium of the skull base surgeon.
Acknowledgments
We thank Matt Pillsbury, manager of the North Carolina Eye Bank Multidisciplinary Surgical Skills Laboratory, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Note
This article was presented in the poster session at the North American Skull Base Society Conference; February 20–22, 2015; Tampa, FL, USA.
References
- 1.Zanation A M, Carrau R L, Snyderman C H. et al. Nasoseptal flap reconstruction of high flow intraoperative cerebral spinal fluid leaks during endoscopic skull base surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009;23(5):518–521. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2009.23.3378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Patel M R, Taylor R J, Hackman T G. et al. Beyond the nasoseptal flap: outcomes and pearls with secondary flaps in endoscopic endonasal skull base reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(4):846–852. doi: 10.1002/lary.24319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hernesniemi J, Korja M. At the apex of cerebrovascular surgery—basilar tip aneurysms. World Neurosurg. 2014;82(1–2):37–39. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.07.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Marlin E S, Ikeda D S, Shaw A, Powers C J, Sauvageau E. Endovascular treatment of basilar aneurysms. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2014;25(3):485–495. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2014.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nanda A, Sonig A, Banerjee A D, Javalkar V K. Microsurgical management of basilar artery apex aneurysms: a single surgeon's experience from Louisiana State University, Shreveport. World Neurosurg. 2014;82(1–2):118–129. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Peerless S J, Hernesniemi J A, Gutman F B, Drake C G. Early surgery for ruptured vertebrobasilar aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1994;80(4):643–649. doi: 10.3171/jns.1994.80.4.0643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ciceri E F, Klucznik R P, Grossman R G, Rose J E, Mawad M E. Aneurysms of the posterior cerebral artery: classification and endovascular treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22(1):27–34. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ferrante L, Acqui M, Trillò G, Lunardi P, Fortuna A. Aneurysms of the posterior cerebral artery: do they present specific characteristics? Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1996;138(7):840–852. doi: 10.1007/BF01411263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gerber C J, Neil-Dwyer G. A review of the management of 15 cases of aneurysms of the posterior cerebral artery. Br J Neurosurg. 1992;6(6):521–527. doi: 10.3109/02688699209002368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pia H W, Fontana H. Aneurysms of the posterior cerebral artery. Locations and clinical pictures. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1977;38(1–2):13–35. doi: 10.1007/BF01401541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators Unruptured intracranial aneurysms—risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention N Engl J Med 1998339241725–1733. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 1999; 340:744 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Haw C, Willinsky R, Agid R, TerBrugge K. The endovascular management of superior cerebellar artery aneurysms. Can J Neurol Sci. 2004;31(1):53–57. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100002833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Uda K, Murayama Y, Gobin Y P, Duckwiler G R, Viñuela F. Endovascular treatment of basilar artery trunk aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils: clinical experience with 41 aneurysms in 39 patients. J Neurosurg. 2001;95(4):624–632. doi: 10.3171/jns.2001.95.4.0624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Drake C G. The treatment of aneurysms of the posterior circulation. Clin Neurosurg. 1979;26:96–144. doi: 10.1093/neurosurgery/26.cn_suppl_1.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hsu F P Clatterbuck R E Spetzler R F Orbitozygomatic approach to basilar apex aneurysms Neurosurgery 200556(1, Suppl):172–177.; discussion 172–177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I. et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2002;11(6):304–314. doi: 10.1053/jscd.2002.130390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fargen K M, Mocco J, Neal D. et al. A multicenter study of stent-assisted coiling of cerebral aneurysms with a Y configuration. Neurosurgery. 2013;73(3):466–472. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Drazin D, Zhuang L, Schievink W I, Mamelak A N. Expanded endonasal approach for the clipping of a ruptured basilar aneurysm and feeding artery to a cerebellar arteriovenous malformation. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19(1):144–148. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Eloy J A Carai A Patel A B Genden E M Bederson J B Combined endoscope-assisted transclival clipping and endovascular stenting of a basilar trunk aneurysm: case report Neurosurgery 200862301142–143.; discussion 143–144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Enseñat J Alobid I de Notaris M et al. Endoscopic endonasal clipping of a ruptured vertebral-posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysm: technical case report Neurosurgery 201169(1, Suppl Operative):E121–E127.; discussion E127–E128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Froelich S Cebula H Debry C Boyer P Anterior communicating artery aneurysm clipped via an endoscopic endonasal approach: technical note Neurosurgery 201168(2, Suppl Operative):310–316.; discussion 315–316 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Germanwala A V Zanation A M Endoscopic endonasal approach for clipping of ruptured and unruptured paraclinoid cerebral aneurysms: case report Neurosurgery 201168(1, Suppl Operative):234–239.; discussion 240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kassam A B Mintz A H Gardner P A Horowitz M B Carrau R L Snyderman C H The expanded endonasal approach for an endoscopic transnasal clipping and aneurysmorrhaphy of a large vertebral artery aneurysm: technical case report Neurosurgery 200659101E162–E165.; discussion E162–E165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kassam A B, Gardner P A, Mintz A, Snyderman C H, Carrau R L, Horowitz M. Endoscopic endonasal clipping of an unsecured superior hypophyseal artery aneurysm. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2007;107(5):1047–1052. doi: 10.3171/JNS-07/11/1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kassam A B, Thomas A J, Zimmer L A. et al. Expanded endonasal approach: a fully endoscopic completely transnasal resection of a skull base arteriovenous malformation. Childs Nerv Syst. 2007;23(5):491–498. doi: 10.1007/s00381-006-0288-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kitano M Taneda M Extended transsphenoidal approach to anterior communicating artery aneurysm: aneurysm incidentally identified during macroadenoma resection: technical case report Neurosurgery 200761502E299–E300.; discussion E300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
