Abstract
AIMS--To evaluate rapid organism identification on positive blood culture Bactec NR media (phial types 26, 27, 42 and 17), and to assess the usefulness of these procedures in a diagnostic microbiology laboratory. METHODS--Two hundred and sixty, first positive, blood culture bottles from individual patients were tested by rapid identification methods selected on the basis of Gram film organism morphology. Tube coagulase and latex agglutination were applied to presumptive staphylococci; latex agglutination antigen detection methods to suspected pneumococci, Neisseria and Haemophilus sp; and latex agglutination grouping tests for cultures thought to be non-pneumococcal streptococci. RESULTS--Media type did not influence test performance (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). Misapplication of methods occurred on eight occasions and there were 14 false positive results, nine involving the latex reagents for group C streptococci and pneumococci. The positive predictive values for tube coagulase tests and latex reactions for H influenzae type b, and N meningitidis groups B and C were 100%. The pneumococcal and staphylococcal latex tests gave positive predictive values of 94.1% and 62.5%, respectively, and the corresponding figure for streptococcal grouping reactions was 75.9%. With the exception of staphylococcal latex testing (80%) all investigation negative predictive values were > 90%. CONCLUSIONS--The performance of the staphylococcal latex agglutination method was unsatisfactory and it is not appropriate for use with the media studied. In view of the cross-reactions observed with the tests used to identify group C streptococci and pneumococci, positive findings must be interpreted with caution. In all other regards the protocol evaluated produced rapid, reliable, clinically useful information and, subject to local experience, is recommended to users of Bactec NR media.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Lee P. C., Wetherall B. L. Cross-reaction between Streptococcus pneumoniae and group C streptococcal latex reagent. J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Jan;25(1):152–153. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.1.152-153.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rappaport T., Sawyer K. P., Nachamkin I. Evaluation of several commercial biochemical and immunologic methods for rapid identification of gram-positive cocci directly from blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Jul;26(7):1335–1338. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.7.1335-1338.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rink M. J. Rapid identification of organisms from blood cultures. Med Lab Sci. 1990 Jan;47(1):6–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rossney A. S., English L. F., Keane C. T. Coagulase testing compared with commercial kits for routinely identifying Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Pathol. 1990 Mar;43(3):246–252. doi: 10.1136/jcp.43.3.246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wellstood S. Evaluation of Phadebact and Streptex Kits for rapid grouping of streptococci directly from blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Feb;15(2):226–230. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.2.226-230.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams R. G., Hart C. A. Rapid identification of bacterial antigen in blood cultures and cerebrospinal fluid. J Clin Pathol. 1988 Jun;41(6):691–693. doi: 10.1136/jcp.41.6.691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]