Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2015 Apr 11;96(4):839–860. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12977

KdmA, a histone H3 demethylase with bipartite function, differentially regulates primary and secondary metabolism in A spergillus nidulans

Agnieszka Gacek‐Matthews 1,, Luke M Noble 2,, Clemens Gruber 3, Harald Berger 4, Michael Sulyok 5, Ana T Marcos 6, Joseph Strauss 1,4,, Alex Andrianopoulos 2,
PMCID: PMC4949671  PMID: 25712266

Summary

A spergillus nidulans kdmA encodes a member of the KDM4 family of jumonji histone demethylase proteins, highly similar to metazoan orthologues both within functional domains and in domain architecture. This family of proteins exhibits demethylase activity towards lysines 9 and 36 of histone H3 and plays a prominent role in gene expression and chromosome structure in many species. Mass spectrometry mapping of A . nidulans histones revealed that around 3% of bulk histone H3 carried trimethylated H3K9 (H3K9me3) but more than 90% of histones carried either H3K36me2 or H3K36me3. KdmA functions as H3K36me3 demethylase and has roles in transcriptional regulation. Genetic manipulation of KdmA levels is tolerated without obvious effect in most conditions, but strong phenotypes are evident under various conditions of stress. Transcriptome analysis revealed that – in submerged early and late cultures – between 25% and 30% of the genome is under KdmA influence respectively. Transcriptional imbalance in the kdm A deletion mutant may contribute to the lethal phenotype observed upon exposure of mutant cells to low‐density visible light on solid medium. Although KdmA acts as transcriptional co‐repressor of primary metabolism genes, it is required for full expression of several genes involved in biosynthesis of secondary metabolites.

Introduction

Chromatin modification is widely recognised as an important mechanism in gene and genome regulation, conferring stability and flexibility to expression patterns, cellular memory and positional controls. The core packaging proteins, histones, are subject to a wide variety of regulatory covalent modifications, most commonly involving attachment of methyl‐, acetyl‐, phosphate‐ or ubiquitin groups to particular amino acid residues of histone N‐termini at the nucleosome exterior.

These histone modifications are dynamic and, together with DNA methylation, largely determine chromatin state, that is transcriptionally competent euchromatin or transcriptionally repressed, silent heterochromatin. Of the plethora of known histone modifications, one of the best understood markers for heterochromatic genes is histone H3 lysine 9 methylation (H3K9me2/3). It is a canonical marker of compact, silent, heterochromatic domains (Tschiersch et al., 1994; Allshire et al., 1995; Ekwall et al., 1995; 1996; Ivanova et al., 1998; Eissenberg and Elgin, 2000; Bannister et al., 2001; Nakayama et al., 2001). Recently, we and other groups showed that in filamentous saprophytic and pathogenic fungi gene clusters coding for low molecular weight compounds such as toxins, antimicrobial substances or virulence factors are de‐repressed upon depletion of elements required for heterochromatin formation (Bok et al., 2009a; Reyes‐Dominguez et al., 2010; Boedi et al., 2012; Soyer et al., 2014). However, in Aspergillus nidulans, amino acid substitution of histone H3 lysine K9 to arginine (H3K9R) does not lead to an altered secondary metabolites (SM) cluster gene expression profile or other obvious phenotypic changes under a range of conditions (Nuetzmann et al., 2013). Thus, it is not clear how H3K9me2/3 and HepA [orthologue of heterochromatin protein‐1 (HP1)] binding are involved in SM gene cluster regulation, and it remains to be determined to which extent they directly or indirectly influence the chromatin status and gene expression at the tested loci. Apart from H3K9me2/3, H3K27me3 and the associated chromodomain (CD)‐containing Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 are also associated with heterochromatic regions (Dahiya et al., 2001; Heard, 2005; Feil and Berger, 2007; Sessa et al., 2007). Recently, genome‐wide distribution of this mark was studied in Neurospora crassa (Jamieson et al., 2013) and Fusarium graminearum (Connolly et al., 2013), and in both cases H3K27me3 domains were found in various secondary metabolite gene clusters. Biosynthesis of symbiosis‐specific alkaloids was also shown to be regulated by H3K27me3 – in combination with H3K9me3 and Hep1 – in the plant symbiont Epichloë festucae (Chujo and Scott, 2014). Typical features of transcriptionally competent euchromatin are H3K4me2/3 and H3K36me2/3. Both marks form almost mutually exclusive domains within the coding regions of active genes where H3K4me3 is mainly associated with the initiating form of RNA polymerase II (PolII) at the 5′ end of genes, whereas H3K36me3 is associated with the elongating form of PolII and thus is dominant in gene bodies of actively transcribed genes (Liu et al., 2005; Liu et al., 2011; Roudier et al., 2011). In budding yeast, Set‐2 mediated H3K36me3 formation was shown to be involved in control of elongation fidelity and in preventing transcription initiation from cryptic promoters within transcribed genes. This mechanism requires SET2–HDAC interaction maintaining low levels of histone acetylation within gene bodies. In addition, H3K36me3 inhibits histone exchange within the coding region of transcribed genes (Li et al., 2002a; Krogan et al., 2003; Carrozza et al., 2005; Smolle et al., 2013). The function and distribution of H3K36me3 in A. nidulans is unknown at present. Repeat‐induced point mutation (RIP) of N. crassa Set‐2 leads to developmental defects, whereas histone H3K36 exchange to leucine is lethal in this fungus (Adhvaryu et al., 2005). The emerging picture of histone modifications in fungi is one of remarkable diversity in function and phenotypic effects, with recent genome wide ChIP‐seq studies in F. graminearum finding no association between this mark and active transcription (Connolly et al., 2013).

Given the central role of histone methylation in control of gene expression in diverse organisms, and the strong effect on phenotypes in fungi such as secondary metabolism (SM), pathogenicity and endophytic growth, we set out to study the role of histone demethylases in the A. nidulans model system beginning with an evolutionarily conserved family of histone demethylases, the jumonji domain genes. The jumonji domain, first identified through a gene trap screen for developmental mutants in mice (Takeuchi et al., 1995), refers to N‐terminal (JmjN) and (JmjC) subdomains that are often found together. The JmjC domain, with cofactors Fe2+ and α–ketoglutarate, catalyses oxidative demethylation of methyl‐lysine residues (Clissold and Ponting, 2001; Klose et al., 2006a; Tsukada et al., 2006). JmjC proteins contain additional domains typically found in transcription factors or chromatin associated proteins such us Bright/Arid, plant homeodomain (PHD), C2H2 zinc finger or Tudor (Clissold and Ponting, 2001). Domain composition of JmjC containing proteins and the architecture of a catalytic domain affects their substrate specificity and is the basis for family and subfamily classification. We generated deletion strains for a number of JmjC domain genes and here we report the characterisation of the first one, named kdmA, encoding an orthologue of metazoan H3K36me2/3 and H3K9me2/3 demethylase, a member of JHDM3/JMJD2 family (Chen et al., 2006; Whetstine et al., 2006) now termed KDM4 family under the unified nomenclature (Allis et al., 2007). Until now, KDM4 family demethylases from yeast to animals have been shown to be involved in the regulation of metabolic activity and development. Mammalian JMJD2A antagonizes H3K9me3 and H3K36me3 at euchromatic or facultative heterochromatic loci contributing to transcriptional repression of JMJD2A targeted genes (Klose et al., 2006b). Overexpression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae H3K36me3 demethylase Rph1 leads to growth defects, but this function is not dependent on enzymatic activity (Klose et al., 2007a) suggesting that Rph1 functions as a classical DNA‐binding transcriptional repressor in this case. An estimated 75% of Rph1 targeted genes (containing putative binding sites) are induced upon RPH1 deletion, revealing the direct repressor function of this protein. Genes responding to RPH1 knockout are mainly involved in environmental stress response, normally induced by oxidative stress or DNA damage. In this system, Rph1‐mediated repression is released after Rph1 dissociation from the promoter, allowing the binding of an appropriate activator (Liang et al., 2013).

We found in our study that KdmA is a H3K36 demethylase with roles in transcriptional regulation. Deletion of the gene detectably alters transcription of around 30% of the A. nidulans genome during different metabolic phases. KdmA is necessary to respond to photo stimuli for growth and development and to tolerate the detrimental effects of light, making a mutant highly light‐sensitive. The deletion mutant shows a gene–environment interaction with hypoxia, a key cue for sexual development. We show that genes associated with energy metabolism, protein production and stability are upregulated in the mutant, suggesting a negative role for KdmA in these metabolic processes (directly or indirectly). In contrast, some genes transcribed during SM have strongly reduced transcript levels in the mutant and thus for some of these genes KdmA may act as a facilitator/coactivator of transcription possibly by counteracting repressive heterochromatic structures. Thus, the bipartite function of this histone H3 demethylase seems to be related to the metabolic and developmental phase of A. nidulans cells.

Results

Predicted JmjC domain lysine demethylases in A . nidulans

To survey potential JmjC domain histone demethylases in A. nidulans, phylogenetic analysis from model organisms spanning the plant, animal and fungal kingdoms was conducted based on full‐length proteins and on JmjC domains only (Fig. 1A). Restriction to domains resulted in greater discrimination, but results were not substantially different – established mammalian families were consistently grouped as terminal branches, although we found little sequence differentiation between KDM2 and KDM7 families. Representatives of JmjC domain families found in A. nidulans were AN7455 (KDM2), AN1060 (KDM4), AN8211 (KDM5) and AN0888 (KDM8). In addition, AN2933 is similar to mouse jmjd6, originally designated in error as a phosphatidylserine receptor and yet to receive a systematic name under the unified nomenclature (Allis et al., 2007), and AN4306 is similar to N. crassa dmm‐1, which is required for restriction of H3K9me to silenced transposable elements (Honda et al., 2010). Clearly distinct from other JmjC domain proteins is AN0128, which lacks other motifs implicated in DNA or chromatin interaction such as various zinc finger or AT‐rich interaction domains (Fig. 1B). AN0128 encodes leucine carboxyl methyltransferase and galactose oxidase domains, consistent with the function of its S. cerevisiae orthologue, Ppm2, as a mitochondrial protein involved in hydroxylation of the hypermodified nucleoside wybutosine (Noma et al., 2006; Iyer et al., 2010). Although AN0888 also lacks other domains characteristic of chromatin modification proteins, its JmjC domain clusters closely within the KDM8 family, the mouse member of which possesses H3K36me demethylase activity (Ishimura et al., 2012; Oh and Janknecht, 2012).

Figure 1.

figure

JmjC domain protein phylogeny across fungal, nematode, D rosophila, plant and vertebrate model organisms.

A. JmjC protein domain (Interpro IPR003347) phylogeny. Domains were aligned by Clustal multiple sequence alignment and analysed by Bayesian inference of phylogeny. JmjC domain KDM families (KDM2‐8) are highlighted and A. nidulans proteins are shown in red. Species represented are Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sc), Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Sp), Aspergillus nidulans (An), Neurospora crassa (Nc), Caenorhabditis elegans (Ce), Drosophila melanogaster (Dm), Arabidopsis thaliana (At) and Mus musculus (Mm). Branch colours (gradient from bright red = 95–100%, through black = 70–80%, to light blue = 50–60%) and widths (5 point gradient) represent posterior probability approximations. B. Domain composition of JHDM3/JMJD2 histone demethylases. Mammalian Kdm4a targets H3K9,36me2/3, S. cerevisiae RPH1 lacking both Tudor and PHD domains, removes H3K36me3 and in vitro H3K9me3 mark. A. nidulans orthologue KdmA contain DNA and protein binding domains but lack the Tudor domain.

AN1060 (designated as kdmA) is a member of the mammalian KDM4 family of proteins (also known as JHDM3/JMJD2 in mammals), containing S. cerevisiae paralogues RPH1 and GIS1 (Allis et al., 2007). All characterised proteins within this family are able to demethylate di‐ and trimethylated lysine, including lysines 9 (although S. cerevisiae does not feature H3K9 methylation) and 36 of histone H3 (Cloos et al., 2006; Kim and Buratowski, 2007; Klose et al., 2007b; Sun and Zhou, 2008; Ponnaluri et al., 2009). Both the JmjC domain and general domain architecture of kdmA are similar to orthologues from studied species, including a chromatin binding PHD zinc finger, an N‐terminal JmjN domain and two AT‐hooks (Fig. 1B). JmjC domain similarity is 50–55% for mouse kdm4 members and 63% for S. cerevisiae Rph1 and includes strictly conserved residues required for binding cofactors Fe(II) and α‐ketoglutarate (Chang et al., 2010). Notably, the tandem Tudor domains known to recognise methylated H3K4, H3K9 or H4K20 in chromatin and present in the mammalian isoforms JMJD2A, B and C are missing in KdmA. Chromatin binding of KdmA could be mediated instead by the predicted C4‐H‐C3 PHD Zn finger structure which was shown to interact with H3K9me3 in the JARID1C demethylase (Iwase et al., 2007) and with H3K4me0 (unmethylated lysine 4 in H3) in BHC80, a subunit of the LSD1 demethylase complex (Lan et al., 2007).

MS/MS mapping of Histone H3 methylation

So far, a systematic biochemical analysis of histone post‐translational modifications present in A. nidulans has not been carried out and we thus performed mass spectrometry (MS) to determine the extent of methylation at histone H3 lysine 9 and lysine 36, the putative targets of KdmA. LC‐MS/MS analysis of histone H3 obtained from acidic nuclear extracts prepared from wild type, kdmAΔ and clrDΔ cells (devoid of H3K9 methylation activity) grown for 17 h [active growth, primary metabolism (PM)] revealed peptides (K27AAPSTGGVK36K37PHR) in which di‐ and trimethylated K36 was dominant: 92% of peptides carried either of the two marks, around 28% of the peptides carried H3K36me2 and around 64% carried H3K36me3. In contrast, mono‐methylated and unmodified K36 together represented only around 1.5% of the peptides. The remaining fraction was represented by peptides that carried, in addition to the H3K36 methylation marks, an acetylation mark on K27 (Fig. 2A). Acetylation of H3K27 occurred only when H3K36 was di‐ or trimethylated indicating a co‐transcriptional effect of this mark. Strikingly, methylation of H3K27 – a crucial modification associated with repressed chromatin in other fungi – was not detected in our samples. This is consistent with a lack of genes in the A. nidulans genome predicted to code for members of Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 known to methylate H3K27 in mammals and other fungi.

Figure 2.

figure

LC‐MS/MS determined H 3 K 36me3 levels inWT , kdm A Δ and clr D Δ.

A. LC‐MS/MS Base Peak Chromatograms (BPC) and ratios of differently modified variants of the histone H3 K27AAPSTGGVK36K37PHR peptide from WT, clrDΔ and kdmAΔ.

B. Western blot with antibody specific to H3K36me3 and histone H3‐ C term. 15 µg of acidic extracted A. nidulans histones were loaded.

We also tested acidic extracts from the kdmAΔ strain for the presence of the relevant modification. Both MS measurement of histone H3 fractions and Western blots using anti‐H3K36me3 antibody did not reveal any increase in H3K36me3 levels in the bulk histones of kdmAΔ (Fig. 2). This finding is not surprising given the fact that approximately 95% of histones already carry either di‐ or trimethylation marks on H3K36 and thus a further increase by lack of KdmA function cannot be expected at the global level (bulk histone preparations) but may occur at specific loci. Such changes can be detected by the more sensitive Chromatin Immunoprcipitation (ChIP) method.

MS/MS analysis of the clrDΔ control strain lacking the histone H3 lysine K9 methyltransferase revealed that methylation on the H3 peptides containing K27 and K36 was identical to wild type (WT). This demonstrates that ClrD is not targeting these lysines in H3 in addition to K9 (see below).

As KdmA is predicted to also target lysine 9 at histone H3, we investigated H3 peptides containing this crucial residue. In the K9STGGK14APR peptide trimethylation of H3K9 was found in roughly 3% of the peptides (between 1.5% and 4% of the analysed K9 peptides; Fig. 3). This H3K9 methylation level of bulk histones is significantly below the levels found in higher eukaryotes and around half the level found in N. crassa (Xiong et al., 2010). Consistent with the function of ClrD as an H3K9 methyltransferase, H3K9me3 was not detected in clrDΔ extracts by neither MS/MS or by Western analysis (Fig. 3). On the other hand, no significant increase in H3K9me3 levels were found by MS/MS or Western blots in H3 peptides of kdmAΔ extracts. This suggests that, at the global level, KdmA may not be involved in defining the heterochromatic landscsape. Surprisingly, neither MS measurement nor Western blot analysis using a H3K9me2 specific antibody provided any evidence for the presence of mono‐ or di‐methylated H3K9 in A. nidulans (Fig. S1). Latter marks are the dominating marks in fission yeast in which H3K9me3 is also very low (Folco et al., 2008). The majority of H3K9 peptides in both WT and mutant were acetylated (around 72%; Fig. 3A) or not modified (around 22%).

Figure 3.

figure

LC‐ MS/MS determined H 3 K 9me3 levels inWT , kdm A Δ and clr D Δ.

A. LC‐MS/MS Base Peak Chromatograms (BPC) and ratios of differently modified variants of the histone H3 K9STGGK14APR peptide from WT, clrDΔ and kdmAΔ.

B. Western blot with antibody specific to H3K9me3 and histone H3‐C term. 15 µg of acidic extracted A. nidulans and 2 μg of calf thymus (+) histones were loaded.

We were searching for additional modifications such as arginine methylation or serine phosphorylation, but in this experimental set‐up, no additional modifications on the N‐terminus of H3 were detected. An automated search (MASCOT) as well as manual interpretation of the data were performed to identify differently modified variants of the peptides, obtained from an Arg‐C digestion. Arg‐C is a specific cystein endoproteinase that cleaves at the C‐terminus of arginine residues. Various potential modifications were considered, that is methylation (K,R), dimethylation (K,R), trimethylation (K,R), acetylation (K), phosphorylation (S,T) and oxidation (M), but only those modifications already described in the manuscript were detected (and confirmed by MS/MS). Nevertheless, modifications occurring in marginal proportions may be below the detection limit. Especially modifications of arginine could result in partially missed cleaved variants and thus signal loss or splitting. To reveal methylated arginines, a different set of proteases needs to be employed because the actual enzyme may not efficiently cut the methylated form in the arginine‐lysine combination.

KdmA displays locus‐specific histone H3 lysine demethylation activity

As we did not find any significant differences in global histone H3 methylation between wild type and kdmA mutants, we performed ChIP analysis to quantify possible locus‐specific differences between the strains. For this, we chose a housekeeping gene (benA) and loci belonging to secondary metabolite gene clusters. aflR and ipnA were previously shown to be regulated by heterochromatic marks and aptA was recently discovered to be a biosynthetic gene required for the production of asperthecin (Szewczyk et al., 2008). These clusters are silent during PM (17 h standard batch growth conditions on 1% glucose and 10 mM nitrate) and activated during the transition to SM (in our experimental conditions 48 h of growth on the same culture medium). Therefore, for simplicity we call 17 h cultures PM and 48 h cultures SM. Figure 4A shows the transcriptional levels of the genes targeted for chromatin analysis by ChIP based on RNAseq (see below). Under these experimental conditions, benA expression is strong and constitutive; aflR is induced from very low to high levels whereas aptA is only slightly induced in our conditions. In contrast to aflR and aptA, which are basically silent during active growth (PM), ipnA is already transcribed to a significant level in these 17 h cultures.

Figure 4.

figure

Locus specific H3K36me3 levels increase concomitantly with transcript levels and SM titers.

A. Expression levels of aflR, ipnA, aptA and housekeeping gene benA in 17 h (PM) and 48 h (SM) cultures. Bar chart symbolises normalised read counts of WT and kdmAΔ. Standard bars represent standard deviation of two independent biological experiments.

B. H3K36me3 levels at 3′ regions of aflR, ipnA, aptA and housekeeping gene benA detected by qChIP in relation to input DNA. Chromatin was isolated from WT 17 h (PM) and 48 h (SM) liquid cultures. ***P < 0.00005, **P < 0.001, *P < 0.01 determined by t‐test: Two‐Sample Assuming Equal Variances. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of at least two biological and two technical replicates.

C. Sterigmatocystin concentration after 48 h liquid submerged culture in WT and kdmAΔ. Cultures were inoculated with defined spore concentration and incubated for 48 h, followed by HPLC‐MS/MS analysis of the supernatants.

ChIP analysis using an antibody against H3K36me3 (ab9050) produced clear and significant results consistent with the high abundance of this mark found by MS (roughly 65% of peptides carry this mark under PM growth conditions). ChIP data also demonstrated that this methylation mark is highly enriched when the tested genes are activated (Fig. 4A and B) and that KdmA functions as H3K36me3 demethylase in vivo (Fig. 5). In the near constitutively transcribed benA, we find very little difference (permanently high levels) of H3K36me3 marks under all experimental conditions, whereas in the tested inducible genes (aflR, ipnA, aptA) H3K36me3 levels were low under PM conditions (non‐induced state) and increased several‐fold under SM conditions, in parallel with transcriptional induction (Fig. 4B).

Figure 5.

figure

H3K36me3 levels are not necessarily directly correlated to transcriptional activity. ChIP with H3K36me3 antibody followed by qPCR with primers specific to 3′ region of indicated genes. Data in relation to input DNA normalised to WT 17 h *** P < 0.001, **P < 0.005, *P < 0.01 determined by t‐test: Two‐Sample Assuming Equal Variances. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of at least two biological and two technical replicates.

For the kdmA mutant, we saw a significant increase in H3K36me3 during PM at the aflR and ipnA locus and some slightly higher levels at the aptA genes (Fig. 5). Not surprisingly, there was no further increase of the already high H3K36me3 levels detected during SM conditions in aflR, ipnA and aptA at these loci. These results suggest that KdmA in vivo functions as H3K36me3 demethylase which, at loci involved in SM, removes this mark under conditions of PM and thus may contribute to silencing of SM genes under PM conditions. However, at PM conditions, the higher H3K36me3 levels did not lead to transcriptional activation of the cognate genes. This is consistent with the well‐known requirement for specific transcription factors for the activation event and suggests that H3K36me3 may be one among other signals required for transcriptional activation or efficient elongation.

Inspection of transcriptional activity during SM conditions in the kdmAΔ mutant showed that the majority of inducible genes such as ipnA or aflR show lower mRNA levels in the mutant (Fig. 4A). This is consistent with reduced sterigmatocystin levels found in the mutant strain (Fig. 4C). Thus, it appears that the H3K36me3 (and possibly H3K9me3) demethylation function of KdmA does not follow the ‘simple’ code of being a repressor due to removal of the positively acting H3K36me3 mark, but more complex and locus‐specific functions need be considered (see Discussion ).

Expression profiling reveals bipartite functions of KdmA both under PM and SM conditions

To shed more light on the transcription‐related functions of KdmA and the consequences of its deletion, we performed global gene expression analysis by RNA sequencing (RNAseq) of the cultures grown for 17 h (PM conditions) and 48 h (SM conditions). Prior to sequencing, the reverse transcribed RNAs were checked by qPCR for expression of PM and SM indicator genes (benA and aflR, respectively) to ensure appropriate culture conditions and verify RNAseq results (data not shown).

Deletion of kdmA in A. nidulans produces both positive and negative changes in transcriptional readouts and the number of affected genes is different under different conditions. Around 25% of all predicted genes (2682 genes) are differentially regulated (log2 ≥ 2) between wild type and mutant in early submerged culture cells. Under these conditions, we find 1125 genes higher and 1557 genes lower expressed in the mutant. At a later growth stage and nutrient restriction (SM conditions, 48 h) about 30% of the genes are differentially expressed (3294 genes) between wild type and mutant, but the proportion between up‐ and downregulated genes (1589 up and 1696 down) remains roughly the same. However, the analysis performed in this work cannot distinguish between direct and indirect effects of KdmA function on gene expression.

Comparison of expression profiles recorded from actively growing wild type and mutant cells (PM conditions) revealed striking differences in the expression patterns. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) shown in Fig. 6 provided evidence that removal of KdmA activity from A. nidulans cells results in upregulation of many genes involved in basic metabolism. In our graphical representation of the GSE analysis, the size of the node represents the number of genes, the larger the node, the higher the number of genes contained in it. Red‐coloured nodes symbolise genes stronger expressed in the kdmA mutant pointing to a direct or indirect negative regulatory role of the H3 demethylase for expression of these genes. In contrast, blue‐coloured nodes represent genes for which mRNA levels are higher in the wild type pointing to a positive regulatory role of KdmA in this case. Two main pathways were highly over‐represented in our GSEA, namely gene ontology (GO) terms relating to cellular energy production like genes involved in mitochondriondrial functions, the production of storage compounds such as trehalose or glycogen and genes required to counteract or to respond to the presence of hydrogen peroxide. The genes belonging to these cellular processes are represented as red‐coloured node‐centres in Fig. 6. Another large category of genes fall into GO terms associated with ribosome structural constituents, assembly of the components (nucleolus), and export from the nucleus as well as general protein translation functions. Related to this are the overexpressed genes involved in protein degradation (proteasome function and endopeptidases) and metabolism of branched‐chain amino acids. Higher mitochondrial activity, protein production and turn‐over may produce some internal redox imbalances resulting in upregulation of stress‐related genes. Thus, the latter function may be indirect and a consequence of higher respiratory stress. Overall, KdmA and possibly also its demethylation function is required to keep this subset of genes to a moderate or low level. In contrast, KdmA also seems to have a positive direct or indirect transcriptional role because in GSEA, we detected genes that were downregulated in the mutant (higher in the wild type, represented as blue‐coloured centres of the nodes in Fig. 6). Besides nucleosides metabolism and ethanol catabolism, these down‐regulated genes belong to the category of SM and penicillin biosynthesis, are significantly lower in the mutant under tested conditions. In our targeted gene analysis, we also found lower transcription of ipnA, one of the genes necessary for penicillin formation, in the mutant (compare Fig. 4). This lower expression in the mutant occurs despite higher H3K36me3 levels (compare Fig. 5) and thus points, in this specific case, to a negative role of H3K36me3 and a positive role for KdmA in ipnA early transcription.

Figure 6.

figure

K dm A is a repressor of primary metabolism expressed genes. GO term enrichment network based on gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) rank results. Node size is scaled by number of genes, node colour by enrichment significance. Aggregates result for kdm A Δ/ WT at 17 h (node centre) and at 48 h (node border). That is, expression of primary metabolism genes is consistently increased in kdm A Δ relative to wild‐type (certain terms such as gluconeogenesis, transport are only significant at 48 h).

In order to better understand the role of KdmA in regulation of genes during SM, we extracted in GSEA genes differentially regulated in wild type and kdmAΔ during the SM phase (48 h, represented as node‐border colours in Fig. 6). The upregulation effect in the kdmA mutant of genes involved in the GO categories previously seen in PM (mitochondria, ribosomal functions, etc.) were largely maintained under these SM conditions (node‐borders coloured in red, KdmA function as repressor) but strikingly, GO terms associated with SM were downregulated in the mutant (enhanced in the wild type, blue node‐border colours). This is in agreement with our previous targeted analysis that also showed downregulation of induced aflR and ipnA levels in 48 h cultures (SM condtions, Fig. 4 and 6). So, although KdmA acts as repressor of some PM genes, it seems to be required for the full expression of SM genes. To verify this, we examined other predicted and annotated secondary metabolite gene clusters in more detail. A heat‐map of all predicted SM gene clusters (Inglis et al., 2013) is presented in Fig. 7. In this analysis, SM cluster mean expression was calculated based on RNAseq read counts normalised to the gene length and to the number of genes within the cluster (Inglis et al., 2013). We set the threshold for background expression to log2∼7 RNAseq reads corresponding to the number of reads obtained from the very low expressed cluster for asperthecin (APT) biosynthesis in the 48 h cultures (SM conditions). From the annotated 71 gene clusters associated with non‐essential secondary metabolic functions, 19 of these clusters were expressed significantly above the cut‐off value already under conditions of active growth, that is 17 h cultures corresponding to primary metabolic conditions (Fig. 7). This again undermines that ‘typical’ SM conditions do not exist and obviously different clusters need different growth or incubation conditions for expression of their cognate genes. In our case, we refer to SM conditions as those leading to high expression of the extensively studied model ST cluster. Only two out of the 19 SM clusters expressed already under PM conditions were KdmA dependent and repressed when the demethylase was missing. One of the repressed clusters carries penicillin biosynthesis genes, and this supports our control measurement by qPCR in which ipnA was also downregulated in the kdmAΔ mutant. The second cluster is coding for emericellamide (EAS) biosynthesis as described by Wang et al. (Chiang et al., 2008). In these two clusters, KdmA appears to act as transcriptional co‐activator under the conditions of active growth. Remarkably, the predicted cluster around AN12331, which is one of the roughly 40 orphan gene clusters without a known cognate metabolite and no expression under any of the classical culture conditions (neither PM nor SM conditions), is highly expressed in the kdmA mutant. Clearly, under these conditions, KdmA directly or indirectly reduces transcript abundance of gene in this gene cluster whereas it positively acts for PEN and EAS gene transcription. Interestingly, H3K36me3 levels were increased for ipnA, one tested gene belonging to the PEN cluster (Fig. 4), in the mutant under PM conditions. This shows that increased methylation in H3 at K36, generally considered a positively acting histone mark, is not necessarily associated with higher transcriptional activity of this gene.

Figure 7.

figure

K dm A deletion alters expression pattern of SM cluster genes in secondary metabolism phase. Heat map for mean expression of previously annotated SM clusters (Inglis et al., 2013). Colour codes represent log2 of read counts per kb of exon per million total library reads (RPKM), the colour scales are located above the maps.

Under our SM conditions, the effect of kdmA absence remains when we analyse the PEN cluster, that is also under these conditions KdmA function is required for full expression. Such a pattern can also be found at the terrequinone A (AN8513‐AN8520), the dba‐F9775 hybrid cluster (AN7896‐AN7916) and AN0016, pkg, pkb clusters with unknown biosynthetic function. However, also under SM conditions, we found opposing KdmA function, that is as transcriptional repressor in AN12331, AN9314 and the pkf gene clusters. So, under our conditions of SM, in six clusters KdmA has positive functions and in three clusters it displays negative functions. This is a clear indication that KdmA function influences transcription in positive and negative ways and this feature is locus and condition dependent.

Manipulation of kdm A expression reveals genetic and environmental interactions including lethality under light

Deletion in a haploid A. nidulans strain shows kdmA is not essential; indeed tests across a range of carbon and nitrogen sources did not reveal any conspicuous growth or development phenotypes (Fig. S2). Most A. nidulans laboratory strains, including the transformation recipient strain used here, carry a partial loss of function mutation (defective nuclear import signal) in the developmental regulator velvetA (veA1) that arose through inadvertent selection (Käfer, 1965; Mooney and Yager, 1990; Mooney et al., 1990; Bayram et al., 2008b; Calvo, 2008). Although the wild‐type favours sexual development in the dark and requires light to promote asexual development (conidiation), veA1 mutants show strong, uniform conidiation regardless of lighting due to the disrupted N‐terminal nuclear localisation sequence, with delayed and diminished sexual development (Champe et al., 1994; Kim et al., 2002). In order to assess any potential role for kdmA in sexual development, light response or SM, it was therefore necessary to generate a kdmAΔ strain in a veA + background.

After outcrossing to a wild‐type strain and scoring progeny for segregating markers, including pyrG+ as a proxy for the kdmA gene replacement, it was evident that no kdmAΔ and very few veA1 progeny were present (kdmA is closely linked to veA on chromosome VIII), whereas all other tested genetic markers segregated independently in the expected Mendelian ratios. Extensive testing traced the basis of this bias to the presence of light. kdmAΔ ascospores or conidia plated at low density on complete medium (up to approximately 10 per cm2) under fluorescent white light failed to form colonies (Fig. 8A), whereas high‐density inoculation under light resulted in poor, irregular growth and impaired development. Incubation in the dark allowed recovery of all genotypic classes in the expected proportions, confirming the phenotype is a specific interaction between light and kdmA genotype.

Figure 8.

figure

Deletion of kdm A causes light lethality and sensitivity to oxidative stress during vegetative growth.

A. kdmAΔ (LN12211) and control WIM126 strains were inoculated at low density on complete medium alone, or with added ascorbate or hydrogen peroxide as indicated, and incubated in constant light or dark for 2 days at 37°C.

B. kdmAΔ (LN12211, LN12063) and control strains (WIM126, MH11037) in veA+ and veA1 backgrounds were inoculated at low density (∼ 300 conidia per plate) and incubated either in constant dark or light for 24 h, or shifted from light to dark after 6 h.

C. Zone of inhibition plate test for kdmAΔ (LN12211) and control (WIM126) strains (see Experimental procedures ). The zone of inhibition area was measured and averaged for three wells across two plates for each treatment. H202/ascorbate is H202 added to plates containing 5 mM ascorbate. Errors are standard error of the mean. All statistical tests are comparisons between kdmAΔ and wild‐type in the same lighting condition and are significant by Student's t‐test at P < 0.05 (*) or P < 0.01 (**), except for wild‐type on paraquat, as indicated, which shows a significant response to light.

Shifting plates from dark to light following inoculation showed that kdmAΔ strains were only susceptible after completion of germination. Conidia allowed to germinate under light for 6 h then shifted to dark for a further 18 h were indistinguishable from constant dark‐grown colonies, whereas light exposure after germination resulted in cumulative growth retardation (Fig. 8B). Sensitivity was not strongly wavelength dependent, as similar inhibition was seen under both blue and red light filters (Fig. S3).

kdmA expression was measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) in vegetative and developmental conditions, and in specific response to light exposure. mRNA increased slightly after acquisition of developmental competence and considerably during development (∼ 10‐fold during conidiation), but there was no evidence for light‐mediated induction of kdmA (Fig. S4).

A copy of kdmA under control of the xylP xylose inducible promoter was integrated at the yA locus. Crossing to a kdmAΔ strain and varying exposure of plated ascospores to light and xylose showed ectopic expression was able to fully restore light tolerance (Fig. S5). Overexpression in solid media resulted in secretion of an intense red/purple pigment into the medium beginning at around 36 h of growth (supplementary Fig. S6B). Pigment production was associated with derepressed sexual development, which is usually restricted to aerial growth, with numerous cleistothecia nurse (Hülle) cells produced beneath the agar surface (Fig. S6A). Dense profusions of pigment could be seen emerging from some of these Hülle cells at foci of maximal hyphal density (Fig. S6C). Targeted mass spectrometry of secondary metabolites using the multi metabolite method did not reveal any of the metabolites detected by this method.

Lethality of kdm A Δ in light is due to chronic oxidative stress

As light is a well‐known pro‐oxidant (Gourmelon et al., 1994; Grzelak et al., 2001; Rossel et al., 2007; Ziegelhoffer and Donohue, 2009), antioxidants were tested for their ability to rescue the light lethality. Addition of ascorbate fully restored growth to kdmAΔ strains grown at low density under light (Fig. 8A). As would be expected if lethality were due to oxidative stress, loss of kdmA also resulted in greater sensitivity to oxidants such as H2O2, KO2 and paraquat in the dark, which was further exacerbated under light (Fig. 8C).

Light had no effect on wild‐type tolerance to H2O2 but clearly enhanced sensitivity to paraquat. Redox cycling by paraquat generates superoxide (O2), which is subsequently converted to H2O2 and O2 either spontaneously or through the activity of superoxide dismutase (Halliwell, 2006). This suggested a synergistic action of light and superoxide is particularly damaging. Superoxide levels were examined by staining with dihydroethidium, either in constant dark, or dark followed by a 30 min treatment with light or exogenous superoxide in the form of aqueous KO2 (Fig. S7). Fluorescence was significantly higher for kdmAΔ under light relative to wild‐type, and to kdmAΔ in the dark (P < 0.05, Student's t‐test), consistent with an impairment in oxidative stress response. Although superoxide levels also increased in wild‐type in response to light exposure, only kdmAΔ was measurably affected by KO2 treatment. This suggests wild‐type is better able to cope with both a sustained (light) and acute (KO2) oxidative challenges.

Light could interact with a sensitised phenotype through photodynamic generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The thiazine dye Methylene Blue (MB) is widely used as a redox‐cycling indicator and photosensitiser (Oz et al., 2011) and has also been reported to have antioxidant activity (Zhang et al., 2006; Atamna et al., 2008). MB at 5 μM has been shown to effect photodynamic destruction of pyridoxine in A. nidulans growth medium, though without direct inhibition of a wild‐type strain (Osmani et al., 1999). We found that light‐dependent inhibition of wild‐type was evident at a concentration of 100 μM (Fig. S8). In contrast, 10 μM MB rescued the kdmAΔ light‐lethal phenotype, and no photodynamic action against the strain was apparent at higher doses. This suggests that, in contrast to wild‐type, MB acts predominantly as an antioxidant in the mutant and further supports the hypothesis that lethality is due to an oxidative imbalance.

To determine if light sensitivity is a common, undetected phenotype of stress response mutants, we generated and analysed a number of gene deletion strains for light sensitivity including the catalase genes catA and catB, mitochondrial SOD sodM, fhdA, msnA, flavohemoglobin fhbA, the alternative oxidase aodA and two‐component stress response regulator srrA. Of these, one mutant, srrA, showed a clear inhibition when incubated on complete medium under constant light, with mean colony area reduced to around 10% of dark incubated controls over the first 30 h of growth (data not shown).

Transcriptional profiling of kdm A deletion under light

Whole genome microarray profiling was performed to address transcriptional responses to light on solid medium (in contrast to the conditions of submerged growth reported above). A clear response to light was detected in both wild‐type and kdmAΔ, despite a relatively low dynamic range of differential gene expression [63 genes were found to be regulated twofold or greater in kdmAΔ under light at P < 0.05 after correction for multiple testing, with a maximum absolute change of around ninefold (Fig. S9 and processed microarray data in Supplemental Table ST3)]. Most obvious by Gene Ontology enrichment was induction of genes annotated as responding to stressors such as heat ROS.

For both up‐ and downregulated wild‐type light responses, approximately 70% of genes were concordantly regulated in the kdmAΔ strain. Gene activity discordant between wild‐type and kdmAΔ or exaggerated in the mutant was examined in detail as this could underlie the observed light sensitivity. Few genes that were upregulated in wild‐type in response to light remained uninduced in kdmAΔ (Fig. S9). This class included metacaspase casA, MAP kinase kinase mkkA and the plasma membrane ATPase pmaA. Genes showing higher or unique differential expression in kdmAΔ under light were far more common and were significantly enriched for drug resistance factors (transporters atrB, atrD, atrG (AN0771), AN0732, AN2531, AN3952 and AN6581) and other stress response genes including five putative heat shock genes.

Discussion

The kdmA gene encodes the sole member in A. nidulans of the highly conserved KDM4 family of JmjC domain lysine demethylases. Although the catalytic JmjC domain of S. cerevisiae Rph1 (regulator of photolyase 1) and Aspergillus KdmA are similar and contain functionally conserved residues, domain architectures differ in that Rph1/Gis1 have C2H2 DNA binding domains rather than the more general affinity AT‐hooks and PHD zinc finger of KdmA. In this regard, KdmA is similar to orthologues of higher eukaryotes that have only the PHD zinc finger (e.g. Caenorhabditis elegans JMJD2A) or PHD and Tudor (e.g. mouse KDM4A) interaction domains. However, the Tudor domain is not present in KdmA. Given the divergence in DNA binding domains and the fact that expression of A. nidulans photolyase cryA does not correlate closely with kdmA levels (data not shown), A. nidulans and S. cerevisiae downstream targets may not be conserved. Nevertheless, it is interesting that deletion of cryA, which acts as both photoreceptor and repair enzyme, also causes induction of Hülle cell development and secretion of a purple/pink pigment in liquid culture, similar to kdmA overexpression (Fig. S6C) (Bayram et al., 2008a). Further study is required to determine if kdmA overexpression phenotypes are mediated in part through cryA and to test for integration with known environmental sensing and developmental pathways.

All characterised members of the KDM4 family are capable of removing di‐ and trimethyl groups from lysines 9 and 36 of histone H3. H3K9me2 and me3 are modifications mostly associated with silent constitutive or facultative heterochromatic regions in which HP1 with its CD recognises these marks and thereby helps to form and maintain repressive structures (Bannister et al., 2001; Lachner et al., 2001). This classical view coming from studies in Drosophila and mammals has been revised as recent progress has shed light on additional roles in active transcription for the HP1 isoforms HP1b and HP1c where they colocalize with elongating PolII, chromatin chaperones and transcription factors (Li et al., 2002b; Greil et al., 2003; Grewal and Moazed, 2003; De Lucia et al., 2005; Kwon and Workman, 2011). Also for this positive function HP1 proteins still require H3K9 methylation, and it has been shown that H3K9me3 is enriched in some actively transcribed gene bodies (Turck et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2010; Roudier et al., 2011). Moreover, in Drosophila, HP1 directly interacts with and recruits the dKDM4a demethylase (a KdmA homologue) to a subset of heterochromatic genes thereby linking the H3K9me3 and H3K36me3 chromatin marks (Liang et al., 2011; Lin et al., 2012). Thus, KDM4 family demethylases serve at least two functions with opposing transcriptional readouts: in one case it interacts with HP1‐type proteins in silent heterochromatic regions, demethylates H3K9me3, and this results in loss of silencing and possibly gene activation. In the opposite pathway, it is also recruited to H3K9me3 by HP1, but it demethylates H3K36me3, a positively acting mark. This function would reinforce silencing by not touching the negatively acting (H3K9me3) but removing the positively acting (H3K36me3) mark. In our transcriptional analyses comparing wild type and kdmAΔ cells, we in fact see this bipartite pattern: genes that lose and genes that gain transcriptional activity when KdmA is absent. Interestingly, in submerged cultures, we see a clear separation of these activities between the two metabolic states tested in our studies. Under conditions of PM and active growth, we see higher activity of several classical housekeeping genes in the mutant (e.g. genes with predicted mitochondrial functions or involved in protein translation and stability). This result is consistent with the function of KdmA as transcriptional repressor. However, at the moment, we do not have data that would allow us to distinguish between repressor functions of KdmA by H3K36me3 demethylation or by binding to DNA as transcriptional repressor (or by indirect effects). ChIP data with increased H3K36me3 levels in the mutant at two loci belonging to secondary metabolite gene clusters (aflR and ipnA) strongly suggest that KdmA acts in fact directly as H3K36 demethylase. This function could be exclusively or in addition to a direct repression function of KdmA. Experiments are under way in which we are ChIPing wild‐type and enzymatically disabled tagged versions of KdmA to better understand the repressive function of this protein.

In this context, it is noteworthy that increased H3K36 methylation is not necessarily only associated with active transcription. Although we do see at several tested loci an increase in H3K36 methylation when the gene is induced, there is also a transcription‐independent increase of H3K36me3 seen for example at the aflR locus when KdmA is depleted. This is an important observation as it shows that H3K36me3 is not simply the consequence of transcriptional activity by PolII interaction as reported before (Smolle et al., 2013), but H3K36 methylation – and probably Set2 recruitment – occurs also independently of transcription. Although there is no transcriptional consequence of the increased H3K36 methylation levels in the SM gene clusters, we see higher transcript abundances when KdmA is deleted in many PM and housekeeping genes. Thus, KdmA in this case functions as negative transcriptional modulator maintaining a balanced network.

Where and to what extent KdmA functions as transcriptional co‐activator or facilitator, the mechanistic basis is even more obscure at the moment. This positively correlated function of KdmA is seen in genes belonging to secondary metabolite gene clusters that are activated in stationary cultures. We have previously shown for some selected SM gene clusters that HepA and the H3K9me3 methyltransferase ClrD (homologue of N. crassa Dim5) participate in silencing. The interaction between KDM4‐family members JHDM3A and HP1 is well established in Drosophila and mammals, and in these systems HP1 – via its H3K9me3‐binding modules – recruits KDM4A and stimulates the H3K36 demethylating activity of KDM4A (Lin et al., 2008; 2012). In this pathway, loss of HP1 results in increased H3K36me3 levels and higher transcript rates of target genes. Although this has not been tested in our work, we consider the KdmA–HepA interaction as a possible mechanism underlying the observed upregulation effect of several secondary metabolite gene clusters in HepA deletion strains.

However, this pathway does not function in both directions, as loss of KdmA does not lead to upregulation of SM genes but, conversely, to loss of transcription. Also on solid complex media expression from six of the 11 clustered genes responsible for biosynthesis of the secondary metabolite monodictyphenone (MDP) was significantly downregulated in the mutant. Interestingly, this was also the case for two xanthone prenyltransferases that are required for MDP biosynthesis but located outside of the gene cluster. MDP was recently identified as overproduced in a cclA (H3K4me2/3 methylation) mutant (Bok et al., 2009b; Chiang et al., 2010), associated with a reduction in both H3K9me3 and H3K4me2/3 at deregulated genes. This suggests that KdmA may be directly required for cluster expression through removal of repressive H3K9me2/3 marks, limiting heterochromatin protein 1 (HepA) occupancy. This positive function of KdmA may be similar to the antagonism found between HP1 and KDM4 (JHDM3A) at certain heterochromatic loci (Klose et al., 2006b). In this case, overexpression of the demethylase abrogates HP1 recruitment to heterochromatic sites and loss of the demethylase would consequently increase HP1 occupancy and repression. Thus, both mechanisms may be applicable to A. nidulans, but additional studies will be necessary to clarify if also in A. nidulans HepA and KdmA interact.

Unfortunately, due to contradictory results obtained with two different H3K9me3 antibodies regularly used in our laboratory (produced by Abcam and Active Motif), we were not able to unequivocally determine the degree of H3K9me3 in the studied SM cluster genes. Preliminary analysis of ChIP‐seq data (A. Gacek, H. Berger, Z. Lewis and J. Strauss, unpublished observations), which were obtained comparing the precipitation profiles of these two most frequently applied commercial H3K9me3 antibodies, suggest that in A. nidulans, the Abcam antibody to some extent also recognises H3K36me3. The alternative Active Motif antibody shows a distinct pattern of H3K9me3 at many different loci including some SM gene clusters under the applied conditions, and these data will be reported elsewhere with a detailed bioinformatic analysis.

Notwithstanding these uncertainties in the function of KdmA as H3K9me3 demethylase, we propose that its main role is to demethylate H3K36me3. This idea is based on our findings that this latter mark is by far the most common methylation mark on our identified bulk peptides. Together with H3K36me2 (which was detected by histone mass spectrometry but not tested here by ChIP), H3K36me3 is present on around 90% of identified peptides isolated from actively growing cultures. As mentioned above, this histone mark is traditionally associated with actively transcribed genes, and the dominance of these marks correlates well with a strong transcriptional activity under these growth conditions. In this context, it is not surprising that deletion of kdmA in A. nidulans produces both positive and negative changes in transcriptional readouts and that the number of affected genes is different under different conditions. It must be emphasised that the analysis performed in this work cannot distinguish between direct and indirect effects of KdmA function on gene expression. To be able to differentiate between direct target genes of KdmA and indirect transcriptional effects, one would need genome‐wide KdmA localisation studies (ChIP‐seq) using a tagged functional version of the protein. In addition, on directly targeted genes, the protein may act as histone H3K36 demethylase and/or as transcriptional adaptor protein independently of its demethylase function and thus positively or negatively affecting transcription. To distinguish between these different potential functions of KdmA, the ChIP‐seq analysis would require tagged versions of different KdmA variants carrying mutations in the proposed functional domains (see Fig. 1). Finally, we cannot exclude that KdmA may act also as lysine‐demethylase on non‐histone substrates, as documented in other systems (Ponnaluri et al., 2009).

Despite the generally subtle growth and developmental consequences seen upon manipulation of kdmA expression under standard laboratory conditions, variation of the environment revealed dramatic phenotypes. Deletion resulted in lethality for isolated conidia incubated under fluorescent white light, generally considered a benign environmental cue that directs A. nidulans towards asexual conidiation and away from sexual development. Transcriptional profiling revealed that light provoked a broad stress response even in wild‐type, also evident in a recent study measuring the response of wild‐type to a shorter (30 min) light pulse (Ruger‐Herreros et al., 2011). Higher expression in the mutant of genes related to mitochondrial function would be consistent with unbalanced intracellular redox status thus leading to higher susceptibility against pro‐oxidants found in our phenotyping analysis of the mutant. Although experimental conditions were very different, data from the two studies were significantly correlated (Pearson's r = 0.54), suggesting a large proportion of light regulated expression is stable over the 0.5–2 h window.

It is clear that light can be both a developmental cue and a significant stress to A. nidulans. If kdmAΔ is lethal under light due to chronic oxidative stress, then it might be expected that induction of stress response genes is impaired in the mutant. This has been observed for deletion of other chromatin modification genes in C. elegans and D. melanogaster (Kirienko and Fay, 2010) and, in A. nidulans, for arginine methyltransferases rmtA and rmtC (Bauer et al., 2010) and histone deacetylase hdaA (Tribus et al., 2005). Transcriptional profiling of the kdmA deletion on solid medium identified a diverse group of genes implicated in stress response that are misregulated under light in the mutant. These ranged from signal transduction and ubiquitin proteasome components to factors directly involved in neutralisation of reactive redox species, such as peroxiredoxin and glutathione transferases. However, transcriptional misregulation of these candidates was, individually, modest in scale and the mutant phenotype may be due to additive effects, or post‐transcriptional regulation. We also have to consider that some differentially regulated genes in the kdmA mutant may simply respond to the increased oxidative stress of mutant cells under normal growth conditions and thus are not under direct KdmA control. Given the complex genotype‐by‐environment interactions seen between kdmA and SM production, and exogenously supplied modulators of oxidative stress, another possibility is that certain SMs are photodynamic directly contribute to light sensitivity in kdmAΔ.

This is not mutually exclusive with a generally impaired stress response and distinguishing between these hypotheses will require additional phenotypic and functional data.

Thus, kdmA plays a vital role in facilitating adaptation to ecologically relevant, stressful and competitive conditions encountered in its natural heterogeneous environment. Our data indicate that, on the molecular level, KdmA must have at least two functions: as an enzymatically active H3K36me3 demethylase as well as a transcriptional adaptor possibly mediating both transcriptional induction and repression at different sets of genes. In Fig. 9, we summarise our findings in a model and speculate that KdmA may act as antagonist of the silencing machinery in genes or gene clusters that are under the control of heterochromatic marks (HepA, ClrD). Furthermore, KdmA may act as transcriptional adaptor in addition to its function as demethylase or heterochromatic antagonist even at the same genomic location. To decipher these distinct functions, it will be necessary to study different KdmA mutants with defects in each of the predicted functional domains. Ongoing genome‐wide localisation studies with an active and enzymatically disabled version of KdmA will at least partially reveal already which of the two functions is exerted by KdmA at which locus, thereby improving our understanding of the role histone modifiers play in fungal metabolic und developmental regulation.

Figure 9.

figure

Possible model for the bipartite function of K dm A.

A. In this scenario (e.g. SM gene clusters), KdmA would function as activator by removing trimethyl groups from H3K9 or by directly counteracting HepA binding. Enzymatic function and direct competition with HepA or other chromatin modifiers are not exclusive events.

B. When KdmA acts as repressor of transcription its demethylases activity would lead to removal of H3K36me3 and subsequently, cryptic promoters within gene bodies would become active and block transcriptional elongation. Alternatively or additionally, KdmA, via its DNA binding domain, may directly repress transcription. Both mechanisms would lead to downregulation of transcriptional activity of the target genes.

Experimental procedures

Strains, media, growth conditions and transformations

Aspergillus nidulans strains used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Experimental strains were obtained by sexual crosses or by transformation into TN02A25 (MH11037) nkuAΔ strain, which reduces the frequency of non‐homologous integration (Nayak et al., 2006), but then crossed to WIM126 to get veA+ or remove background markers. Genetic analysis was carried out using techniques as described by Todd et al. (2007b). DNA transformation of A. nidulans was performed according to Tilburn et al. (1983) and Andrianopoulos and Hynes (1988). KdmA deletion cassettes were constructed using DJ PCR or split‐marker fusion PCR (Kuwayama et al., 2002; Yu et al., 2004), with the N. crassa and A. fumigatus pyr‐4 genes as selectable markers, pyrG+ transformants were recovered after transformation into an nkuA strains (Nayak et al., 2006). Southern analysis confirming the deletion of kdmA is shown in Figure S11. AG004 kdmAΔ and WT paba A1 were used unless stated otherwise. Other deletion strains screened for light sensitivity were made using deletion cassettes obtained from the Fungal Genetics Stock Center (McCluskey et al., 2010).

ANM minimal media, complete medium, supplements and growth conditions were as described by Todd et al. (2007a). For SM cluster gene expression, ChIP and HPLC‐MS/MS analysis 10 mM sodium nitrate otherwise ammonium tartrate at 10 mM was added as nitrogen source. YEG (0.5% yeast extract, 2% carbon source) medium was also used were indicated. For induction of the xylP promoter, xylose or xylan was used at the indicated concentrations.

For SM cluster gene expression, ChIP and HPLC‐MS/MS analysis spores in concentration 4*106/ml were inoculated into 200 ml AMM and incubated at 180 r.p.m. for 17 h and 48 h.

Incubation was at 37°C except where noted otherwise. For ‘dark’ treatment, plates were loosely wrapped in aluminium foil within an unlit incubator. For ‘light’ treatment, plates were incubated at a distance of approximately 1 m from polycarbonate shielded F36W/840 triphosphor fluorescent white lighting (Sylvania Lamps).

Phylogenetic analysis

JmjC domain proteins were sourced from the SMART database (Schultz et al., 1998; Letunic et al., 2009), aligned by Clustal multiple sequence alignment in MEGA version 5 (Tamura et al., 2011), analysed by Bayesian inference of phylogeny in MrBayes 3.2.1 (two independent runs of 1 million generations with a mixed amino acid model and a mixture of variant and invariant sites approximated by a four‐category gamma distribution) (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist, 2001; Ronquist and Huelsenbeck, 2003) and imported into FigTree (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/) for graphical manipulation.

Deletion and overexpression of kdm A

Oligonucleotides used are shown in Supplementary Table S2. The kdmA deletion construct was generated using two‐step fusion PCR to link kdmA flanking regions (primers kdmA S1 and S2, S7 and S8) to overlapping fragments of the N. crassa pyr‐4 or A. fumigatus pyrG gene (primers Nc pyr‐4 S3 and S4, S5 and S6), and transformed as two linear split‐marker fragments (Catlett et al., 2003) or as linear deletion cassette (Yu et al., 2004). For kdmA overexpression, coding region was amplified by PCR (primers kdmA F4 OE and kdmA S1) and cloned into the HindIII and SmaI sites of the xPyA‐3 vector (pCW7468) (Wong et al., 2009) to form plasmid pLN7807.

Nucleic acid isolation

Aspergillus nidulans genomic DNA was extracted from frozen mycelia as described by Lee and Taylor (1990). For small‐scale preparations, a dilute spore solution was lysed by brief sonication (Branson Ultrasonics) and purified by phenol/chloroform extraction. Total RNA was isolated from filtered, flash frozen mycelia using a Fastprep bead‐beater (MP Biomedicals) and Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) following the manufacturers' protocol.

Real‐time RT‐PCR

Total RNA was treated with DNAse I (Promega) and reverse transcribed into cDNA using the Promega Reverse Transcription System with random primers. PCR was carried out in a Corbett RG‐3000 thermocycler using Quantace SYBR Green SensiMix. Two to three biological replicates with three technical replicates were carried out, and differential expression was calculated using the comparative Ct method against a beta‐tubulin standard (benA).

ChIP coupled quantitative PCR

Chromatin immunoprecipitation was modified from Bernreiter et al. (2007). Mycelia after 17 h and 48 h culture were cross‐linked for 15 min with 1% formaldehyde at room temperature, followed by 5 min quenching with 125 mM glycine. Chromatin was incubated with antibodies specific to H3K36me3 (Abcam, 9050), or Histone H3 C‐terminus (Abcam, 1791) and Dynabeads Protein A (Invitrogen). Precipitated DNA from two biological and two technical replicates was quantified by real‐time PCR according to protocol (Bio‐Rad) using iQ SYBR Green Supermix and normalized to input DNA. Primers used in quantitative PCR were HPLC purified and are shown in Supplementary Table 2.

High throughput RNA sequencing (RNAseq) and analysis

Illumina sequencing libraries were made from RNA samples according to TruSeq RNA Sample prep kit v2 (Illumina) following the manufacturers protocol with 1 μg total RNA input. The 50 bp single end sequencing was performed using a HiSeq Illumina sequencer. Obtained sequences were de‐multiplexed, quality controlled and mapped on the A. nidulans genome assembly (A_nidulans_FGSC_A4_version_s10‐m03‐r07). Mapping was performed using Novoalign (NovoCraft), and reverse transcripts were counted using python script HTSeq (Anders et al., 2014). Normalisation and statistics were done using R/Bioconductor and the limma and edgeR packages, using mean‐variance weighting (voom) and TMM normalisation (Gentleman et al., 2004). A significance cut‐off of P < 0.05 (adjusted for multiple testing by the false discovery rate method) was applied for analysis.

Gene functional analysis used GSEA with 1000 gene set permutations (Subramanian et al., 2005), the Enrichment Map plugin for Cytoscape 2.8 (http://www.cytoscape.org/index.html) with minimum P‐value of 0.005 and false discovery rate Q‐value 0.1 (Merico et al., 2010; Smoot et al., 2011; Saito et al., 2012). R plots used the ggplot2 package (Wickham, 2009). Heatmaps of cluster transcription were calculated from the mean of normalised (sequencing libraries and exon length). Transcription levels are log2 read counts per kilobase of exon per million library reads (RPKM). SM clusters are annotated as described by Inglis et al. (2013).

Secondary metabolites HPLC‐MS/MS analysis

The analysis of sterigmatocystin was performed using an HPLC‐MS/MS method for the determination of 186 fungal and bacterial metabolites described by Vishwanath et al. (2009). Detection and quantification in the Selected Reaction Monitoring (SRM) mode was performed with a QTrap 4000 LC‐MS/MS System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) equipped with a TurboIonSpray electrospray ionization (ESI) (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) source and an 1100 Series HPLC System (Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany). Chromatographic separation was performed at 25°C on a Gemini C18 column, 150  ×  4.6‐mm i.d., 5 μm particle size, equipped with a C18 4 × 3 mm‐i.d. security guard cartridge (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA). Injection volume was 5 μl. For quantification, external calibration was performed using multi‐analyte standards prepared and diluted in a 1:1 mixture of extraction and dilution solvent.

All chemicals (LC gradient grade) were from J.T. Baker (Deventer, The Netherlands); ammonium acetate (MS grade) and glacial acetic acid (p.a.) were obtained from Sigma‐Aldrich (Vienna, Austria). Water was purified successively by reverse osmosis and a Milli‐Q plus system from Millipore (Molsheim, France). A certified standard for sterigmatocystin in acetonitrile was from Biopure Referenzsubstanzen GmbH (Tulln, Austria) and Sigma (Vienna, Austria).

Analysis of HPTM by Western blot and LC‐MS/MS

Mycelia from o/n liquid submerged cultures were harvested by filtration and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Histones were acid extracted as previously described (Honda and Selker, 2008), suspended in Laemmli's SDS sample buffer and quantified with Pierce BCA Protein Assay (Thermo). 15 µg of purified histones, 1 μg of recombinant Xenopus laevis H3 as a negative control (Milipore, 14‐ 441) and 2 μg calf thymus histones (Sigma, H9250) as a positive control were separated on 15% SDS‐PAGE gel and subsequently transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare) by electroblotting. Relevant histone modifications were detected with primary antibodies specific to H3K9me3 (Active Motif, 39161), H3K9me2 (Abcam, 1220), H3K27me3 (Abcam, 6002), H3K36me3 (Abcam, 9050), histone H3 C‐terminus (Abcam, 1791) and anti‐rabbit (Sigma, A0545) and anti‐mouse (Sigma, A9044) HRP conjugated secondary antibodies. Chemiluminescence was detected with ClarityTM ECL Western Substrate and ChemiDoc™ XRS (Bio‐Rad).

For MS analysis, relevant histone H3 protein bands were cut out and digested in gel. The proteins were S‐alkylated with iodoacetamide and digested with ArgC (Roche). The peptide mixture was analysed using a Dionex Ultimate 3000 system directly linked to a Q‐TOF MS (Bruker maXis 4G ETD) equipped with the standard ESI source in the positive ion, DDA mode (= switching to MSMS mode for eluting peaks). MS‐scans were recorded (range: 150–2200 Da), and the six highest peaks were selected for fragmentation. Instrument calibration was performed using ESI calibration mixture (Agilent). For separation of the peptides, a Thermo BioBasic C18 separation column (5 μm particle size, 150*0.360 mm) was used. A gradient from 95% solvent A and 5% solvent B (Solvent A: 0.1% FA in water, 0.1% FA in ACCN) to 32% B in 45 min was applied, followed by a 15 min gradient from 32% B to 75% B that facilitates elution of large peptides, at a flow rate of 6 μl/min.

Supporting information

Supporting information

Acknowledgements

Work in Austria was funded by the Austrian Science Fund FWF grant number S10003‐B17 and by the Vienna Science and Technology Fund Project LS 09‐042. Work in Australia was funded by grants from the Australian Research Council and Howard Hughes Medical Institute to AA, and by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (BFU2008‐04306) for work performed by AM in the laboratory of David Canovas. Microarray slides and experimental protocols were provided by the Pathogen Functional Genomics Resource Center (PFGRC) through NIAID, deletion cassettes by the Fungal Genetics Stock Centre. We thank the Oakley and Aguirre laboratories for strains, and Q. Lang for photography. We are grateful to Joan Tilburn and David Canovas for helpful discussions on penicillin production, light regulation and for critically reading the manuscript.

References

  1. Adhvaryu, K.K. , Morris, S.A. , Strahl, B.D. , and Selker, E.U. (2005) Methylation of histone H3 lysine 36 is required for normal development in Neurospora crassa . Eukaryot Cell 4: 1455–1464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allis, C.D. , Berger, S.L. , Cote, J. , Dent, S. , Jenuwien, T. , Kouzarides, T. , et al (2007) New nomenclature for chromatin‐modifying enzymes. Cell 131: 633–636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Allshire, R.C. , Nimmo, E.R. , Ekwall, K. , Javerzat, J.P. , and Cranston, G. (1995) Mutations derepressing silent centromeric domains in fission yeast disrupt chromosome segregation. Genes Dev 9: 218–233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Anders, S. , Pyl, P.T. , and Huber, W. (2014) HTSeq – a Python framework to work with high‐throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31: 166–169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Andrianopoulos, A. , and Hynes, M.J. (1988) Cloning and analysis of the positively acting regulatory gene amdR from Aspergillus nidulans . Mol Cell Biol 8: 3532–3541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Atamna, H. , Nguyen, A. , Schultz, C. , Boyle, K. , Newberry, J. , Kato, H. , and Ames, B.N. (2008) Methylene blue delays cellular senescence and enhances key mitochondrial biochemical pathways. FASEB J 22: 703–712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bannister, A.J. , Zegerman, P. , Partridge, J.F. , Miska, E.A. , Thomas, J.O. , Allshire, R.C. , and Kouzarides, T. (2001) Selective recognition of methylated lysine 9 on histone H3 by the HP1 chromo domain. Nature 410: 120–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bauer, I. , Graessle, S. , Loidl, P. , Hohenstein, K. , and Brosch, G. (2010) Novel insights into the functional role of three protein arginine methyltransferases in Aspergillus nidulans . Fungal Genet Biol 47: 551–561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bayram, O. , Biesemann, C. , Krappmann, S. , Galland, P. , and Braus, G. (2008a) More than a repair enzyme: Aspergillus nidulans photolyase‐like CryA is a regulator of sexual development. Mol Biol Cell 19: 3254–3262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bayram, O. , Krappmann, S. , Ni, M. , Bok, J.W. , Helmstaedt, K. , Valerius, O. , et al (2008b) VelB/VeA/LaeA complex coordinates light signal with fungal development and secondary metabolism. Science 320: 1504–1506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bernreiter, A. , Ramon, A. , Fernandez‐Martinez, J. , Berger, H. , Araujo‐Bazan, L. , Espeso, E.A. , et al (2007) Nuclear export of the transcription factor NirA is a regulatory checkpoint for nitrate induction in Aspergillus nidulans . Mol Cell Biol 27: 791–802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Boedi, S. , Reyes‐Dominguez, Y. , and Strauss, J. (2012) Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis in filamentous fungi. Methods Mol Biol 944: 221–236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bok, J.W. , Chiang, Y.M. , Szewczyk, E. , Reyes‐Domingez, Y. , Davidson, A.D. , Sanchez, J.F. , et al (2009a) Chromatin‐level regulation of biosynthetic gene clusters. Nat Chem Biol 5: 462–464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bok, J.W. , Chiang, Y.M. , Szewczyk, E. , Reyes‐Dominguez, Y. , Davidson, A.D. , Sanchez, J.F. , et al (2009b) Chromatin‐level regulation of biosynthetic gene clusters. Nat Chem Biol 5: 462–464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Calvo, A.M. (2008) The VeA regulatory system and its role in morphological and chemical development in fungi. Fungal Genet Biol 45: 1053–1061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Carrozza, M.J. , Li, B. , Florens, L. , Suganuma, T. , Swanson, S.K. , Lee, K.K. , et al (2005) Histone H3 methylation by Set2 directs deacetylation of coding regions by Rpd3S to suppress spurious intragenic transcription. Cell 123: 581–592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Catlett, N.L. , Lee, B.N. , Yoder, O.C. , and Turgeon, B.G. (2003) Split‐marker recombination for efficient targeted deletion of fungal genes. Fungal Genet Newsl 50: 9–11. [Google Scholar]
  18. Champe, S.P. , Nagle, D.L. , and Yager, L.N. (1994) Sexual sporulation. Prog Ind Microbiol 29: 429–454. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chang, Y. , Wu, J. , Tong, X.J. , Zhou, J.Q. , and Ding, J. (2010) Crystal structure of the catalytic core of Saccharomyces cerevesiae histone demethylase Rph1: insights into the substrate specificity and catalytic mechanism. Biochem J 433: 295–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen, Z. , Zang, J. , Whetstine, J. , Hong, X. , Davrazou, F. , Kutateladze, T.G. , et al (2006) Structural insights into histone demethylation by JMJD2 family members. Cell 125: 691–702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chiang, Y.M. , Szewczyk, E. , Nayak, T. , Davidson, A.D. , Sanchez, J.F. , Lo, H.C. , et al (2008) Molecular genetic mining of the Aspergillus secondary metabolome: discovery of the emericellamide biosynthetic pathway. Chem Biol 15: 527–532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Chiang, Y.M. , Szewczyk, E. , Davidson, A.D. , Entwistle, R. , Keller, N.P. , Wang, C.C. , and Oakley, B.R. (2010) Characterization of the Aspergillus nidulans monodictyphenone gene cluster. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 2067–2074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chujo, T. , and Scott, B. (2014) Histone H3K9 and H3K27 methylation regulates fungal alkaloid biosynthesis in a fungal endophyte‐plant symbiosis. Mol Microbiol 92: 413–434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Clissold, P.M. , and Ponting, C.P. (2001) JmjC: cupin metalloenzyme‐like domains in jumonji, hairless and phospholipase A2beta. Trends Biochem Sci 26: 7–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Cloos, P.A.C. , Christensen, J. , Agger, K. , Maiolica, A. , Rappsilber, J. , Antal, T. , et al (2006) The putative oncogene GASC1 demethylates tri‐ and dimethylated lysine 9 on histone H3. Nature 442: 307–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Connolly, L.R. , Smith, K.M. , and Freitag, M. (2013) The Fusarium graminearum histone H3 K27 methyltransferase KMT6 regulates development and expression of secondary metabolite gene clusters. PLoS Genet 9: e1003916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Dahiya, A. , Wong, S. , Gonzalo, S. , Gavin, M. , and Dean, D.C. (2001) Linking the Rb and polycomb pathways. Mol Cell 8: 557–569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. De Lucia, F. , Ni, J.Q. , Vaillant, C. , and Sun, F.L. (2005) HP1 modulates the transcription of cell‐cycle regulators in Drosophila melanogaster . Nucleic Acids Res 33: 2852–2858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Eissenberg, J.C. , and Elgin, S.C. (2000) The HP1 protein family: getting a grip on chromatin. Curr Opin Genet Dev 10: 204–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ekwall, K. , Javerzat, J.P. , Lorentz, A. , Schmidt, H. , Cranston, G. , and Allshire, R. (1995) The chromodomain protein Swi6: a key component at fission yeast centromeres. Science 269: 1429–1431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ekwall, K. , Nimmo, E.R. , Javerzat, J.P. , Borgstrom, B. , Egel, R. , Cranston, G. , and Allshire, R. (1996) Mutations in the fission yeast silencing factors clr4+ and rik1+ disrupt the localisation of the chromo domain protein Swi6p and impair centromere function. J Cell Sci 109 (Part 11): 2637–2648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Feil, R. , and Berger, F. (2007) Convergent evolution of genomic imprinting in plants and mammals. Trends Genet 23: 192–199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Folco, H.D. , Pidoux, A.L. , Urano, T. , and Allshire, R.C. (2008) Heterochromatin and RNAi are required to establish CENP‐A chromatin at centromeres. Science 319: 94–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gentleman, R.C. , Carey, V.J. , Bates, D.M. , Bolstad, B. , Dettling, M. , Dudoit, S. , et al (2004) Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol 5: R80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gourmelon, M. , Cillard, J. , and Pommepuy, M. (1994) Visible light damage to Escherichia coli in seawater: oxidative stress hypothesis. J Appl Bacteriol 77: 105–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Greil, F. , van der Kraan, I. , Delrow, J. , Smothers, J.F. , de Wit, E. , Bussemaker, H.J. , et al (2003) Distinct HP1 and Su(var)3–9 complexes bind to sets of developmentally coexpressed genes depending on chromosomal location. Genes Dev 17: 2825–2838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Grewal, S.I. , and Moazed, D. (2003) Heterochromatin and epigenetic control of gene expression. Science 301: 798–802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Grzelak, A. , Rychlik, B. , and Bartosz, G. (2001) Light‐dependent generation of reactive oxygen species in cell culture media. Free Radic Biol Med 30: 1418–1425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Halliwell, B. (2006) Reactive species and antioxidants. Redox biology is a fundamental theme of aerobic life. Plant Physiol 141: 312–322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Heard, E. (2005) Delving into the diversity of facultative heterochromatin: the epigenetics of the inactive X chromosome. Curr Opin Genet Dev 15: 482–489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Honda, S. , and Selker, E.U. (2008) Direct interaction between DNA methyltransferase DIM‐2 and HP1 is required for DNA methylation in Neurospora crassa . Mol Cell Biol 28: 6044–6055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Honda, S. , Lewis, Z.A. , Huarte, M. , Cho, L.Y. , David, L.L. , Shi, Y. , and Selker, E.U. (2010) The DMM complex prevents spreading of DNA methylation from transposons to nearby genes in Neurospora crassa . Genes Dev 24: 443–454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Huelsenbeck, J.P. , and Ronquist, F. (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754–755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Inglis, D.O. , Binkley, J. , Skrzypek, M.S. , Arnaud, M.B. , Cerqueira, G.C. , Shah, P. , et al (2013) Comprehensive annotation of secondary metabolite biosynthetic genes and gene clusters of Aspergillus nidulans, A. fumigatus, A. niger and A. oryzae . BMC Microbiol 13: 91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ishimura, A. , Minehata, K. , Terashima, M. , Kondoh, G. , Hara, T. , and Suzuki, T. (2012) Jmjd5, an H3K36me2 histone demethylase, modulates embryonic cell proliferation through the regulation of Cdkn1a expression. Development 139: 749–759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ivanova, A.V. , Bonaduce, M.J. , Ivanov, S.V. , and Klar, A.J. (1998) The chromo and SET domains of the Clr4 protein are essential for silencing in fission yeast. Nat Genet 19: 192–195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Iwase, S. , Lan, F. , Bayliss, P. , de la Torre‐Ubieta, L. , Huarte, M. , Qi, H.H. , et al (2007) The X‐linked mental retardation gene SMCX/JARID1C defines a family of histone H3 lysine 4 demethylases. Cell 128: 1077–1088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Iyer, L.M. , Abhiman, S. , de Souza, R.F. , and Aravind, L. (2010) Origin and evolution of peptide‐modifying dioxygenases and identification of the wybutosine hydroxylase/hydroperoxidase. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 5261–5279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Jamieson, K. , Rountree, M.R. , Lewis, Z.A. , Stajich, J.E. , and Selker, E.U. (2013) Regional control of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in Neurospora . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 6027–6032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Käfer, E. (1965) Origins of translocations in Aspergillus nidulans . Genetics 52: 217–232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Kim, H. , Han, K. , Kim, K. , Han, D. , Jahng, K. , and Chae, K. (2002) The veA gene activates sexual development in Aspergillus nidulans . Fungal Genet Biol 37: 72–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Kim, T. , and Buratowski, S. (2007) Two Saccharomyces cerevisiae JmjC domain proteins demethylate histone H3 Lys36 in transcribed regions to promote elongation. J Biol Chem 282: 20827–20835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Kirienko, N.V. , and Fay, D.S. (2010) SLR‐2 and JMJC‐1 regulate an evolutionarily conserved stress‐response network. EMBO J 29: 727–739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Klose, R.J. , Kallin, E.M. , and Zhang, Y. (2006a) JmjC‐domain‐containing proteins and histone demethylation. Nat Rev Genet 7: 715–727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Klose, R.J. , Yamane, K. , Bae, Y. , Zhang, D. , Erdjument‐Bromage, H. , Tempst, P. , et al (2006b) The transcriptional repressor JHDM3A demethylates trimethyl histone H3 lysine 9 and lysine 36. Nature 442: 312–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Klose, R.J. , Gardner, K.E. , Liang, G. , Erdjument‐Bromage, H. , Tempst, P. , and Zhang, Y. (2007a) Demethylation of histone H3K36 and H3K9 by Rph1: a vestige of an H3K9 methylation system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae? Mol Cell Biol 27: 3951–3961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Klose, R.J. , Gardner, K.E. , Liang, G. , Erdjument‐Bromage, H. , Tempst, P. , and Zhang, Y. (2007b) Demethylation of histone H3K36 and H3K9 by Rph1: a vestige of an H3K9 methylation system in saccharomyces cerevisiae? Mol Cell Biol 27: 3951–3961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Krogan, N.J. , Kim, M. , Tong, A. , Golshani, A. , Cagney, G. , Canadien, V. , et al (2003) Methylation of histone H3 by Set2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is linked to transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell Biol 23: 4207–4218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Kuwayama, H. , Obara, S. , Morio, T. , Katoh, M. , Urushihara, H. , and Tanaka, Y. (2002) PCR‐mediated generation of a gene disruption construct without the use of DNA ligase and plasmid vectors. Nucleic Acids Res 30: E2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Kwon, S.H. , and Workman, J.L. (2011) The changing faces of HP1: from heterochromatin formation and gene silencing to euchromatic gene expression: HP1 acts as a positive regulator of transcription. Bioessays 33: 280–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Lachner, M. , O'Carroll, D. , Rea, S. , Mechtler, K. , and Jenuwein, T. (2001) Methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 creates a binding site for HP1 proteins. Nature 410: 116–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Lan, F. , Collins, R.E. , De Cegli, R. , Alpatov, R. , Horton, J.R. , Shi, X. , et al (2007) Recognition of unmethylated histone H3 lysine 4 links BHC80 to LSD1‐mediated gene repression. Nature 448: 718–722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Lee, S. , and Taylor, J. (1990) Isolation of DNA from fungal mycelia and single cells In PCR Protocols, A Guide to Methods and Applications Innis M., Gelfand D., Sninsky J., and White T. (eds). San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 282–287. [Google Scholar]
  64. Letunic, I. , Doerks, T. , and Bork, P. (2009) SMART 6: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D229–D232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Li, J. , Moazed, D. , and Gygi, S.P. (2002a) Association of the histone methyltransferase Set2 with RNA polymerase II plays a role in transcription elongation. J Biol Chem 277: 49383–49388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Li, Y. , Kirschmann, D.A. , and Wallrath, L.L. (2002b) Does heterochromatin protein 1 always follow code? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99 (Suppl. 4): 16462–16469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Liang, C.Y. , Hsu, P.H. , Chou, D.F. , Pan, C.Y. , Wang, L.C. , Huang, W.C. , et al (2011) The histone H3K36 demethylase Rph1/KDM4 regulates the expression of the photoreactivation gene PHR1. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 4151–4165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Liang, C.Y. , Wang, L.C. , and Lo, W.S. (2013) Dissociation of the H3K36 demethylase Rph1 from chromatin mediates derepression of environmental stress‐response genes under genotoxic stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Mol Biol Cell 24: 3251–3262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Lin, C.H. , Li, B. , Swanson, S. , Zhang, Y. , Florens, L. , Washburn, M.P. , et al (2008) Heterochromatin protein 1a stimulates histone H3 lysine 36 demethylation by the Drosophila KDM4A demethylase. Mol Cell 32: 696–706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Lin, C.H. , Paulson, A. , Abmayr, S.M. , and Workman, J.L. (2012) HP1a targets the Drosophila KDM4A demethylase to a subset of heterochromatic genes to regulate H3K36me3 levels. PLoS ONE 7: e39758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Liu, C.L. , Kaplan, T. , Kim, M. , Buratowski, S. , Schreiber, S.L. , Friedman, N. , and Rando, O.J. (2005) Single‐nucleosome mapping of histone modifications in S. cerevisiae. PLoS biology 3: e328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Liu, T. , Rechtsteiner, A. , Egelhofer, T.A. , Vielle, A. , Latorre, I. , Cheung, M.S. , Ercan, S. , Ikegami, K. , Jensen, M. , Kolasinska‐Zwierz, P. , Rosenbaum, H. , Shin, H. , Taing, S. , Takasaki, T. , Iniguez, A.L. , Desai, A. , Dernburg, A.F. , Kimura, H. , Lieb, J.D. , Ahringer, J. , Strome, S. , and Liu, X.S. (2011) Broad chromosomal domains of histone modification patterns in C. elegans. Genome research 21: 227–236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Liu, C. , Lu, F. , Cui, X. , and Cao, X. (2010) Histone methylation in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61: 395–420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. McCluskey, K. , Wiest, A. , and Plamann, M. (2010) The fungal genetics stock center: a repository for 50 years of fungal genetics research. J Biosci 35: 119–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Merico, D. , Isserlin, R. , Stueker, O. , Emili, A. , and Bader, G.D. (2010) Enrichment map: a network‐based method for gene‐set enrichment visualization and interpretation. PLoS ONE 5: e13984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Mooney, J.L. , and Yager, L.N. (1990) Light is required for conidiation in Aspergillus nidulans . Genes Dev 4: 1473–1482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Mooney, J.L. , Hassett, D.E. , and Yager, L.N. (1990) Genetic analysis of suppressors of the veA1 mutation in Aspergillus nidulans . Genetics 126: 869–874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Nakayama, J. , Rice, J.C. , Strahl, B.D. , Allis, C.D. , and Grewal, S.I. (2001) Role of histone H3 lysine 9 methylation in epigenetic control of heterochromatin assembly. Science 292: 110–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Nayak, T. , Szewczyk, E. , Oakley, C.E. , Osmani, A. , Ukil, L. , Murray, S.L. , et al (2006) A versatile and efficient gene‐targeting system for Aspergillus nidulans . Genetics 172: 1557–1566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Noma, A. , Kirino, Y. , Ikeuchi, Y. , and Suzuki, T. (2006) Biosynthesis of wybutosine, a hyper‐modified nucleoside in eukaryotic phenylalanine tRNA. EMBO J 25: 2142–2154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Nuetzmann, H.W. , Fischer, J. , Scherlach, K. , Hertweck, C. , and Brakhage, A.A. (2013) Distinct amino acids of histone H3 control secondary metabolism in Aspergillus nidulans . Appl Environ Microbiol 79: 6102–6109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Oh, S. , and Janknecht, R. (2012) Histone demethylase JMJD5 is essential for embryonic development. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 420: 61–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Osmani, A.H. , May, G.S. , and Osmani, S.A. (1999) The extremely conserved pyroA gene of Aspergillus nidulans is required for pyridoxine synthesis and is required indirectly for resistance to photosensitizers. J Biol Chem 274: 23565–23569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Oz, M. , Lorke, D.E. , Hasan, M. , and Petroianu, G.A. (2011) Cellular and molecular actions of Methylene Blue in the nervous system. Med Res Rev 31: 93–117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Ponnaluri, V.K. , Vavilala, D.T. , Putty, S. , Gutheil, W.G. , and Mukherji, M. (2009) Identification of non‐histone substrates for JMJD2A‐C histone demethylases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 390: 280–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Reyes‐Dominguez, Y. , Bok, J.W. , Berger, H. , Shwab, E.K. , Basheer, A. , Gallmetzer, A. , et al (2010) Heterochromatic marks are associated with the repression of secondary metabolism clusters in Aspergillus nidulans . Mol Microbiol 76: 1376–1386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Ronquist, F. , and Huelsenbeck, J.P. (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Rossel, J.B. , Wilson, P.B. , Hussain, D. , Woo, N.S. , Gordon, M.J. , Mewett, O.P. , et al (2007) Systemic and intracellular responses to photooxidative stress in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell 19: 4091–4110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Roudier, F. , Ahmed, I. , Berard, C. , Sarazin, A. , Mary‐Huard, T. , Cortijo, S. , et al (2011) Integrative epigenomic mapping defines four main chromatin states in Arabidopsis . EMBO J 30: 1928–1938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Ruger‐Herreros, C. , Rodriguez‐Romero, J. , Fernandez‐Barranco, R. , Olmedo, M. , Fischer, R. , Corrochano, L.M. , and Canovas, D. (2011) Regulation of conidiation by light in Aspergillus nidulans . Genetics 188: 809–822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Saito, R. , Smoot, M.E. , Ono, K. , Ruscheinski, J. , Wang, P.L. , Lotia, S. , et al (2012) A travel guide to cytoscape plugins. Nat Methods 9: 1069–1076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Schultz, J. , Milpetz, F. , Bork, P. , and Ponting, C.P. (1998) SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool: identification of signaling domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 5857–5864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Sessa, L. , Breiling, A. , Lavorgna, G. , Silvestri, L. , Casari, G. , and Orlando, V. (2007) Noncoding RNA synthesis and loss of Polycomb group repression accompanies the colinear activation of the human HOXA cluster. RNA 13: 223–239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Smolle, M. , Workman, J.L. , and Venkatesh, S. (2013) reSETting chromatin during transcription elongation. Epigenetics 8: 10–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Smoot, M.E. , Ono, K. , Ruscheinski, J. , Wang, P.L. , and Ideker, T. (2011) Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics 27: 431–432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Soyer, J.L. , El Ghalid, M. , Glaser, N. , Ollivier, B. , Linglin, J. , Grandaubert, J. , et al (2014) Epigenetic control of effector gene expression in the plant pathogenic fungus Leptosphaeria maculans . PLoS Genet 10: e1004227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Subramanian, A. , Tamayo, P. , Mootha, V.K. , Mukherjee, S. , Ebert, B.L. , Gillette, M.A. , et al (2005) Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge‐based approach for interpreting genome‐wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 15545–15550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Sun, Q. , and Zhou, D.X. (2008) Rice jmjC domain‐containing gene JMJ706 encodes H3K9 demethylase required for floral organ development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 13679–13684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Szewczyk, E. , Chiang, Y.M. , Oakley, C.E. , Davidson, A.D. , Wang, C.C. , and Oakley, B.R. (2008) Identification and characterization of the asperthecin gene cluster of Aspergillus nidulans . Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 7607–7612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Takeuchi, T. , Yamazaki, Y. , Katoh‐Fukui, Y. , Tsuchiya, R. , Kondo, S. , Motoyama, J. , and Higashinakagawa, T. (1995) Gene trap capture of a novel mouse gene, jumonji, required for neural tube formation. Genes Dev 9: 1211–1222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Tamura, K. , Peterson, D. , Peterson, N. , Stecher, G. , Nei, M. , and Kumar, S. (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28: 2731–2739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Tilburn, J. , Scazzocchio, C. , Taylor, G.G. , Zabicky‐Zissman, J.H. , Lockington, R.A. , and Davies, R.W. (1983) Transformation by integration in Aspergillus nidulans . Gene 26: 205–221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Todd, R.B. , Davis, M.A. , and Hynes, M.J. (2007a) Genetic manipulation of Aspergillus nidulans: heterokaryons and diploids for dominance, complementation and haploidization analyses. Nat Protoc 2: 822–830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Todd, R.B. , Davis, M.A. , and Hynes, M.J. (2007b) Genetic manipulation of Aspergillus nidulans: meiotic progeny for genetic analysis and strain construction. Nat Protoc 2: 811–821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Tribus, M. , Galehr, J. , Trojer, P. , Brosch, G. , Loidl, P. , Marx, F. , et al (2005) HdaA, a major class 2 histone deacetylase of Aspergillus nidulans, affects growth under conditions of oxidative stress. Eukaryot Cell 4: 1736–1745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Tschiersch, B. , Hofmann, A. , Krauss, V. , Dorn, R. , Korge, G. , and Reuter, G. (1994) The protein encoded by the Drosophila position‐effect variegation suppressor gene Su(var)3–9 combines domains of antagonistic regulators of homeotic gene complexes. EMBO J 13: 3822–3831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Tsukada, Y.‐I. , Fang, J. , Erdjument‐Bromage, H. , Warren, M.E. , Borchers, C.H. , Tempst, P. , and Zhang, Y. (2006) Histone demethylation by a family of JmjC domain‐containing proteins. Nature 439: 811–816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Turck, F. , Roudier, F. , Farrona, S. , Martin‐Magniette, M.L. , Guillaume, E. , Buisine, N. , et al (2007) Arabidopsis TFL2/LHP1 specifically associates with genes marked by trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27. PLoS Genet 3: e86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Vishwanath, V. , Sulyok, M. , Labuda, R. , Bicker, W. , and Krska, R. (2009) Simultaneous determination of 186 fungal and bacterial metabolites in indoor matrices by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 395: 1355–1372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Whetstine, J.R. , Nottke, A. , Lan, F. , Huarte, M. , Smolikov, S. , Chen, Z. , et al (2006) Reversal of histone lysine trimethylation by the JMJD2 family of histone demethylases. Cell 125: 467–481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Wickham, H. , (2009) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis.
  112. Wong, K.H. , Hynes, M.J. , Todd, R.B. , and Davis, M.A. (2009) Deletion and overexpression of the Aspergillus nidulans GATA factor AreB reveals unexpected pleiotropy. Microbiology 155: 3868–3880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Xiong, L. , Adhvaryu, K.K. , Selker, E.U. , and Wang, Y. (2010) Mapping of lysine methylation and acetylation in core histones of Neurospora crassa . Biochemistry 49: 5236–5243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Yu, J.H. , Hamari, Z. , Han, K.H. , Seo, J.A. , Reyes‐Dominguez, Y. , and Scazzocchio, C. (2004) Double‐joint PCR: a PCR‐based molecular tool for gene manipulations in filamentous fungi. Fungal Genet Biol 41: 973–981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Zhang, X. , Rojas, J.C. , and Gonzalez‐Lima, F. (2006) Methylene blue prevents neurodegeneration caused by rotenone in the retina. Neurotox Res 9: 47–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Ziegelhoffer, E.C. , and Donohue, T.J. (2009) Bacterial responses to photo‐oxidative stress. Nat Rev Microbiol 7: 856–863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting information


Articles from Molecular Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES