Skip to main content
BMC Public Health logoLink to BMC Public Health
. 2016 Jul 18;16:592. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3296-2

Maternal health care seeking behavior: the case of Haor (wetland) in Bangladesh

Md Aminul Haque 1,, Surjya Kanta Dash 1, Muhammad Abdul Baker Chowdhury 2
PMCID: PMC4949891  PMID: 27430897

Abstract

Background

The state of maternal healthcare (MHC) in Bangladesh is a grave concern especially in the remote haor areas. In this study, we aimed to determine the factors affecting the utilization of MHC services in the haor areas, to discover mothers’ knowledge of MHC, and explore their attitudes toward MHC as well as practices in seeking MHC services.

Method

In this cross-sectional survey (n = 400), we randomly selected mothers (aged 15–49 years) from haor areas of the Habiganj district of Bangladesh. The study participants’ socio demographic information as well as the extent of their knowledge about MHC, their attitudes, and practices in seeking MHC services were ascertained. The degree of association between the respondents’ socio-demographic characteristics and their health-seeking behavior (before, during, and after childbirth) was assessed by the odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) estimated from the bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

Results

The mean age of the study participants was 27.26 years. Respondents had an average of 2.64 children, and 88.6 % had at best a primary education or less. Among the study participants, 61 % of mothers had no knowledge about the availability of MHC in the study area, and only 36 % received any antenatal care (ANC). Also, 47 % sought ANC from government healthcare institutions. Irrespective of complications and potential danger signs, 95 % of births were delivered at home with the assistance of untrained birth attendants. Only 19.75 % of mothers and 12.3 % of infants received postnatal care (PNC). Moreover, mothers who had a secondary or tertiary education level had a higher likelihood of receiving ANC (OR: 3.48, 95 % C.I: 1.49–7.63) compared to mothers with no education. Also, mothers aged 25 years or older were less likely (OR: 0.24, 95 % C.I: 0.06–0.095) to give birth in a health facility than mothers who were younger than 25. The low utilization of MHC services can be attributed to many factors such as a lack of communication, a lack of knowledge about MHC services, low income, decision making, and the lack of a companion with whom to visit health services.

Conclusion

To improve MHC utilization, to reach national targets and to save the lives of mothers and newborns, boat or ship-based special healthcare and educational programs should be implemented in the haor areas.

Keywords: Maternal health care (MHC), Antenatal care (ANC) services, Postnatal care (PNC), Hoar areas, Bangladesh

Background

Maternal mortality ratio (MMR) of a country is an important indicator of the overall health status of its mothers. Similar to other developing countries, in Bangladesh, high MMR epitomizes the end point in a lifetime experience in which women encounter gender discrimination, societal neglect and deprivation. Also, high MMR signifies the weakness of the health system to provide effective services and care for the population. The target of the fifth Millennium Development Goal (MDG-5) for Bangladesh was to reduce MMR by 75 % between 1990 and 2015 (i.e. to reduce the MMR to 143 deaths per 100,000 live births). Bangladesh has experienced a gradual decline in its MMR over the past decades, from 500 in 1990 to 194 in 2010 [1]. However, the ratio remains unacceptably high [2, 3]. The government is committed to improving the maternal health situation in the country by adopting special strategies such as the Safe Motherhood Promotion Project (SMPP) [4]. However, the situation remains critical due to inadequate access to healthcare and poor utilization of modern health services. Despite the government’s serious commitment to deliver health facilities to people’s doorsteps through innovative approaches, such as the Essential Service Package (ESP), the utilization of health services is still far below any acceptable standard. Bangladesh did not meet the MDG-5 by the target year, 2015.

Wide disparities exist in the utilization of MHC services between different geographic regions in Bangladesh. According to the 2010 Bangladesh Maternal Mortality Survey Report, the MMR in urban and rural areas was 178 and 198, respectively, with a national average of 194 [5]. These numbers are quite indicative because Bangladesh is essentially an agrarian country with two-thirds of its total population living in rural areas, however, this is one of the highest MMR indicators in the world [6]. Furthermore, approximately 75 % of the babies born to these rural women also die within the first week of their lives [7]. Because modern health services are not equally accessible throughout the diverse geographic areas in the country (e.g. plain, hilly, forest, marshy, or coastal areas), the regional variation in the MMR is striking. For example, in 2010, the MMR in the marshland-dominated northeastern Sylhet Division, was nearly seven times higher (425) than that in the southwestern Khulna Division (64) [5]. The Sylhet division consists of a large number of haors which are huge bowl-shaped tectonic depressions that receive surface runoff water during the monsoon. Typically, the low-lying plain land in a haor area remains submerged under water for more than six months a year, and during this period, these areas remains completely unreachable. A large area in the eastern part of Bangladesh has been classified as haor. Excessive precipitation, flood, and storms in these areas severely affects human life and movement.

Maternal mortality

Addressing maternal mortality, i.e. the death of a woman during pregnancy or within the first 42 days of post-partum period due to causes directly or indirectly associated with the pregnancy, has been a priority for the global health and development community since the Nairobi Safe Motherhood Conference in 1987 [8]. This conference was followed by numerous international forums at which safe motherhood has always been on the agenda. As a consequence, in 2000 the Millennium Summit of the United Nations set the improvement of maternal health as one of the eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) [9]. Accordingly, the MMR, a significant indicator of the overall health status of women in a country, has now become an essential development indicator around the world.

Over the decades, Bangladesh has made some progress in improving maternal and child health. For example, MMR dropped from 570 per 100,000 live births in 1990–91 to 194 per 100,000 live births in 2010 [5, 10]. Similarly, ANC coverage (at least one visit) increased from 27.5 % in 1993–94 to 58.7 % in 2012–13 [11, 12]. But this progress was not enough to achieve the MDG-5 targets in 2015. The Bangladesh government was committed to achieving the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) for maternal mortality through reducing ‘the MMR by three-quarters by the year 2015’ from 1990 levels [10, 13] and is now preparing to address the Sustainable Development Goals 3.1 (SDGs). To lower the national MMR, there is an urgent need to develop effective and affordable programs that ensure proper utilization of MHC services for every woman in the country, especially in the rural areas. Attaining this ambitious goal requires the strengthening of preventive interventions at the community level, ensuring high-quality basic and comprehensive obstetric care, and promoting timely care-seeking from these facilities for maternal emergencies [14].

Care seeking is in many ways the cornerstone of maternal mortality reduction efforts, yet research into how to best promote care seeking in different settings is lacking [15, 16]. The concept of ‘care seeking’ has often been defined in narrow terms in maternal health, with ‘care’ denoting services provided by professionals with appropriate lifesaving skills, and ‘seeking’ denoting transfer of the woman from the home to a health facility [17]. In a recent national survey on maternal health in Bangladesh, the majority of women reported complications during pregnancy and childbirth, but few reported that they sought care from medically trained providers in health facilities, even when they perceived the complication to be life threatening. Most women reported that they accessed MHC in the home or sites other than designated health centers and facilities [18]. Despite the best efforts of the government to deliver healthcare services to people, the situation of pregnancy and childbirth related morbidity and mortality is worse in Bangladesh because of low utilization of maternal health services in remote areas [19].

MHC delivery system in Bangladesh

The largest part of the country’s health infrastructure and health service system is established under the government’s management and supervision. The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW) is responsible for comprehensive health policy formulation, planning and decision making in Bangladesh. There are two implementation wings under MOHFW: (i) Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS) and (ii) Directorate General of Family Planning (DGFP). The DGHS and DGFP are responsible for implementing all health programs and family planning programs, respectively. Despite having a large population living in a small area, Bangladesh’s public health system is quite well organized. The health service delivery system in the public sector is divided into primary, secondary and tertiary levels. The first contact rural populations have with public health services is in their homes. As the administrative hierarchy rises, the level and sophistication of health services also increase.

A number of studies have been conducted into the difference between MHC utilization in urban and rural areas, but no study has focused exclusively on MHC in the haor areas [17, 2023]. Because of the adverse natural and geographical characteristics of the haor region, the community has to adopt differentiated healthcare seeking approaches. This study can provide the government and/or nongovernment service providers with detailed information about formulating effective strategies to attain the SDG by reducing MMR. In this context, the study aimed to determine mothers’ knowledge about MHC services, the pattern of MHC seeking behavior, and factors affecting the utilization of MHC services in the haor area.

Methods

Study sample

We conducted a cross-sectional study among 400 women age 15–49 years living in two Unions1 of the north-eastern Hobigonj District of Sylhet division of Bangladesh who had had at least one live birth in the 5 years preceding the study. The study area and the study participants were selected through a multi-stage random sample procedure. In the first stage, Habiganj district was selected randomly from the six districts of Sylhet Division where haors are located. In the second stage, Ajmirignaj Upazila (a third level government administrative unit) was selected from the Habiganj district as this unit only contains haor area. In the third stage, two Unions (local level government administrative units) Ajmiriganj Sadar and Shibpasha were selected randomly from the five Unions of Ajmirignaj Upazila. The list of the total number of married couples having at least one child was prepared with the help of Family Welfare Assistants (FWAs) working in the Unions. The total number of married couples listed in Ajmiriganj Sadarunion and Shibpasha Union was 3240 and 3143, respectively. Then, from each union, 200 married women aged 15–49 years who had experienced at least one pregnancy in the preceding 5 years of the study were randomly selected. The sample size was calculated using the standard formula, assuming the total population size being greater than 10,000. The proportion of married women aged between 15 and 49 with respect to the total female population was 0.34 (p = 0.34), so q = 0.66. We set a standard normal deviation at 1.96 corresponding to a 95 % confidence interval and a design effect of 1.0. Using the distribution of the population, the required representative sample size was 345. A total of 400 women (200 from each Union) were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire.

Data collection

Four female research assistants and one supervisor were recruited and trained at the Department of Population Sciences, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh. These four research assistants were involved in the process of the development of the data collection tools, so that they could understand the rationale and theme of each concept and the purpose of the study. All research assistants received training on rapport building, ensuring privacy, confidentiality, and social and cultural sensitivity during data collection. One supervisor was recruited for each Union to lead the data collection process and to resolve any issues related to the data collection. The research assistants described the study purpose and procedures to the study participants, asked for oral consent and enrolled them into the study. The research assistants conducted face-to-face interviews for approximately 1 h with standardized pre tested questionnaires and obtained information on socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, their knowledge of MHC services availability, service delivery schedules, payments mode, ANC, delivery and PNC. The main field work for data collection started on January 01, 2009 and ended on February 15, 2009. The supervisor was present in the field full-time to monitor and ensure the quality of the data collection. All of the information was de-identified before the analyses.

Data analysis

We checked variables for accuracy and calculated descriptive statistics for age groups, number of children, type of family, husbands’ occupation, household monthly income and education level of participants and their husbands. A chi-square test was performed for ANC and PNC by demographic, socioeconomic, and different types of service providers. We employed binary logistic regression to assess the correlates ANC, place of delivery and assistance at delivery with mother’s age at last birth, birth order, mother’s education, husband’s education, monthly family income, and husband’s occupation. Odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Model adequacy was checked using the Chi-square value of the Hosmer Lomshow test. We also examined the value of 2 Log Likelihood ratio test, AIC, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (Version SPSS-12.0 and SPSS-15.0), and considered two-sided inference tests with an alpha <0.05 as statistically significant.

Results

The distribution of the socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents is presented in Table 1. The mean age of the respondents was 27.62 years. Approximately 37.8 % had no formal education and 50.8 % of the respondents had between 1 and 5 years of schooling. Around 30 % of respondents’ husbands were involved in agricultural activities and 34.3 % were day laborers. The mean household income of the respondents was BDT4339.25 per month (1US$ 1 = BDT 79.5 in 2015) for a mean household size of 6.42 people.

Table 1.

Distribution of the respondents by their socio-demographic characteristics

Categories Frequency Percent
 15–19 33 8.3
 20–24 100 25.0
 25–29 133 33.3 Mean age : 27.62 Years;
 30–34 84 21.0
 35–39 45 11.3
 40+ 5 1.3
 Total 400 100.0
Number of children
 1 87 21.8
 2 101 25.3 Mean number of children:2.64/ household
 3 118 29.5
 4 60 15.0
 5 31 7.8
 6+ 3 0.8
 Total 400 100.0
Type of family
 Nuclear family 84 21.0
 Extended family 316 79.0
 Total 400 400
Number of family member
 Less than 5 106 26.5
 6–8 265 66.3 Mean: 6.42
 9+ 29 7.3
 Total 400 100.0
Occupation of the husband of the respondents
 Agriculture 118 29.5
 Day Laborer 137 34.3
 Small business 120 30.0
 Service 18 4.5
 Other 7 1.8
 Total 400 100
Monthly income (TK)
 2000–4000 256 64.0
 4000–6000 93 23.3 Mean: 4339.25
 6000–8000 36 9.0
 8000–10,000 7 1.8
 10,000–12,000 8 2.0
 Total 400 100.0
Level of education Respondent Husband of respondent
Frequency Percent Frequency Percent
 No education 151 37.8 135 33.8
 Primary (1–5) 203 50.8 219 54.8
 Secondary (6–10) 39 9.8 34 8.5
 Higher Secondary (11–12) 7 1.8 5 1.3
 Graduation 7 1.8
 Total 400 100.0 400 100.0

It was observed that only 36 % of women who gave birth in the 5 years preceding the survey received at least one instance of ANC from any source. Also, among the women who received ANC, 47.9 % of them sought it from government healthcare institutions i.e. Upazila Health Complex or Union Family Welfare Centre (Table 2). It was observed from the study that only 13.8 % of women who experienced birth in the 5 years preceding the survey received PNC following their last birth. Findings show that only 12.3 % of infants received PNC (Table 2).

Table 2.

Distribution of respondents by Antenatal Care Visits, sources of ANC, providers and place of delivery

Characteristics Frequency Percent
Antenatal care visits at the time of last pregnancy
 Yes 144 36.0
 No 256 64.0
 Total 400 100
Source of antenatal care
 Government health care institutions 69 47.9
 Pharmacy 28 19.4
 Quack 47 32.6
 Total 144 100.0
Place of delivery
 Home 380 95.0
 Health facility 20 5.0
 Total 400 100.0
Post-natal care for mothers (n = 400)
 Yes 55 13.8
Post-natal care for child (n = 400)
 Yes 49 12.3

The three main reasons for receiving ANC were headache (21 %), abdominal pain (32.7 %), and excessive vomiting (27. 2 %). The main reasons for not seeking ANC in a facility were high cost (24.8 %), lack of money (26.8 %), remote location (7.4 %) and bad transportation (20.0 %) (Table 3). The study findings showed 95 % of deliveries occurred in the home, and only 5 % (20) of deliveries occurred at health centers (Table 3).

Table 3.

Distribution of respondents by problems for which they did and did not sought ANC

Problems Response Percent of cases
N Percent
Reason for seeking ANC
 Regular check-up 10 3.7 6.8
 Headache 57 21.0 38.8
 High blood pressure 11 4.0 7.5
 Tetanus 9 3.3 6.1
 Abdominal pain 89 32.7 60.5
 Injury 17 6.3 11.6
 Excess vomiting 74 27.2 50.3
 Other 5 1.8 3.4
 Total 272 100.0 185.0
Reason for not seeking ANC
 Lack of need of ANC services 66 10 26.1
 Expensive 164 24.8 64.8
 Lack of money 177 26.8 70.0
 Too far/distance 48 7.3 19.0
 Problem with transportation 125 18.9 49.4
 Lack of companion 10 1.5 4.0
 No permission from family 70 10.6 27.7
 Total 660 100.0 260.9

a Multiple responses

The bivariate analysis shows that receiving ANC was significantly associated with the socio-economic and demographic variables like mother’s age at birth, birth order, mother’s education, husband’s education and occupation, and household family income (Table 4). Moreover, mother’s age at birth, birth order, and mother’s education was significantly associated with type of ANC provider (Table 5).

Table 4.

Socio-demographic profile by antenatal care received

Characteristics Antenatal care received Total (N) p-values
Yes No
n % n %
Mothers age at birth
 Less than 25 66 49.6 67 50.4 133
 25–29 45 33.8 88 66.2 133 0.000
 30–34 27 32.1 57 67.9 84
 More than 35 6 12.0 44 88.0 50
Birth Order
 1 48 55.2 39 44.8 87
 2 36 33.6 65 64.4 101 0.000
 3 41 34.7 77 65.3 118
 4 19 20.2 75 79.8 94
Type of family
 Nuclear family 13 35.1 24 64.9 37
 Extended family 131 36.1 232 63.9 363 0.908
Mother’s education
 No education 38 25.2 113 74.8 151
 Primary 71 35.4 132 65.0 203 0.000
 Secondary and more 35 76.1 11 23.9 46
Husband’s education
 No education 32 23.7 103 76.3 135
 Primary 81 37.0 138 63.0 219 0.001
 Secondary and more 31 67.4 15 32.6 46
Husband’s occupation
 Agriculture 40 33.9 78 66.1 118
 Laborer 31 22.6 106 77.4 137
 Small business 55 45.8 65 54.2 120 0.000
 Service 14 77.8 4 22.2 18
 Others 4 57.1 3 42.9 7
Family income
 2000–4000 81 31.6 175 68.4 256
 4000–6000 36 38.7 57 61.3 93 0.000
 6000–8000 18 50.0 18 50.0 36
 More than 8000 9 60.0 6 40.0 15

Table 5.

Background characteristics of participants who received ANC by different type of provider

Background characteristics Medically trained providers Non-trained provider Total (N) p- values
MBBS doctor Nurse/paramedic
N % N % N %
 Mother’s age at birth
 Young aged mother (≤25 years) 23 34.8 29 43.9 14 21.2 66 0.022
 Old aged mother (>25 years) 17 21.8 28 35.9 33 42.3 78
Birth order
 1 21 43.8 18 37.5 9 18.8 48
 2 6 16.7 18 50.0 12 33.3 36 0.038
 3 9 22.0 15 36.6 17 41.5 41
 4 4 21.1 6 31.6 9 47.4 19
Type of family
 Nuclear family 4 30.8 7 53.8 2 15.4 13
 Extended family 36 27.5 50 38.2 45 34.4 131 0.353
Mother’s education
 No education 5 13.2 17 44.7 16 42.1 38
 Primary 17 23.9 29 40.8 25 35.2 71 0.005
 Secondary and more 18 51.4 11 31.4 6 24.3 35
Husband’s education
 No education 6 18.8 10 31.3 16 50.0 32
 Primary 23 28.4 33 40.7 25 30.9 81 0.128
 Secondary and more 11 35.5 14 45.2 6 19.4 31

p-values obtained from Chi-Squire test

The analysis also shows that, mother’s age at birth, type of family, and birth order were significantly associated with determining place of delivery, as well as the type of assistance during delivery (Table 6). Younger mothers, educated mothers, and mothers with husbands with higher a level of education received more PNC (Table 7). The majority of the respondents (85 %) opined that a PNC check-up was not needed.

Table 6.

Place of delivery according to background characteristics

Background characteristics Home THC/ UFWC Total (N) P-Value
N % N %
Mother’s age at birth 0.000
 Young aged mother (≤25) 117 88.0 16 12.0 133
 Old aged mother (>25) 263 98.5 4 1.5 267
Birth Order 0.000
 1 74 85.1 13 14.9 87
 2 97 96.0 4 4.0 101
 3 117 99.2 1 0.8 118
 4 92 97.9 2 2.1 94
Type of family 0.001
 Nuclear family 31 83.8 6 16.2 37
 Extended family 349 96.1 14 3.9 363
Mother’s education 0.111
 No education 143 94.7 8 5.3 151
 Primary 196 96.6 7 3.4 203
 Secondary and more 41 89.1 5 10.9 46
Husband’s education 0.301
 No education 127 94.1 8 5.9 135
 Primary 211 96.3 8 3.7 219
 Secondary and more 42 91.3 4 8.7 46

p-values obtained from Chi-Squire test

Table 7.

Percentage of the respondents received postnatal care by some socio-economic and demographic factor

Background characteristics Postnatal care received Total p- value
Yes No
N % N % N
Mother’s age at birth
 Young aged mother (≤25) 29 21.8 104 78.2 133 0.506
 Old aged mother (>25) 50 18.7 217 81.3 267
Mother’s education
 No education 22 14.6 129 85.4 151
 Primary 46 22.7 157 77.3 203 0.126
 Secondary and more 11 23.9 35 76.1 46
Husband’s education
 No education 20 14.8 115 85.2 135
 Primary 49 22.4 170 77.6 219 0.208
 Secondary and more 10 21.7 36 78.3 46

p-values obtained from Chi-Squire test

Table 8 shows the results from the logistic regression analysis with 95 % confidence interval for the use of ANC. Only mothers’ education level was found to be a significant predictor of receiving ANC adjusted by other covariates. Mothers who have primary education were 3.38 (95 % CI: 1.39, 8.70) times more likely to receive ANC compared to the mothers without education. Similarly, mothers with secondary education had higher odds (OR: 3.48, 95 % CI: 1:50, 7.63) of receiving ANC compared to the mothers without education. No association was observed for mother’s age at birth, birth order, husband’s education, family income and/ or husband’s occupation.

Table 8.

Logistic regression estimates for use of antenatal care

Independent variable Regression coefficient Odds ratio = Exp (B) 95 % C.I. for Exp (B)
Lower Upper
Mother’s age at last birth
 Less than 25 years (RC) 1.00
 25 years and more −0.390 0.677 .372 1.232
Birth order
 First birth (RC) 1.00
 Second birth and more −0.414 0.661 .333 1.314
Mother’s education
 No education (RC) 1.00
 Primary 1.248 3.378* 1.394 8.696
 Secondary and more 1.217 3.482* 1.495 7.631
Husband’s education
 No education (RC) 1.00
 Primary 0.888 2.429 .984 6.001
 Secondary and more 0.576 1.779 0.825 3.839
Monthly family income
 Less than Tk. 2500 (RC) 1.000
 TK. 2500 and more .084 1.087 0.657 1.799
Occupation of husband
 Laborer (RC) 1.000
 Other than laborer 0.488 1.630 .932 2.849
Constant −1.092 .336
HosmerLomshow test = Chi-square 7.942 sig. 0.439
−2 Log likelihood = 466.256
Nagelekerke R. = .188

* = p <0.05, RC reference category

The results also show that only mother’s age was significantly associated with predicting the place of delivery. It was found that, mothers aged 25 years and older were less likely (OR: 0.24, 95 % CI: 0.06, 0.95) to give birth in a healthcare facility than the mothers who are less than 25 years of age (Table 9). Neither birth order nor family type had influence on predicting the place of delivery.

Table 9.

Logistic regression estimate for place of delivery of respondents

Independent variable Regression coefficient Odds ratio = Exp (B) 95 % C.I. for Exp (B)
Lower Upper
Mother’s age at last birth
 Less than 25 years (RC) 1.00
 25 years and more −1.436 0.24* 0.059 0.954
Birth order
 First birth (RC) 1.00
 Second birth and more −0.971 0.379 0.115 1.251
Family type
 Nuclear family (RC) 1.00
 Extended family −0.920 0.399 0.135 1.181
Constant 4.314 74.725
HosmerLomshow test = Chi-square 5.73, sig. 0.125
−2 Log likelihood = 133.33
Nagelekerke R. = .188

* = p <0.05, RC reference category

Similar to the place of delivery, only mothers’ level of education was significantly associated with predicting assistance during delivery. It was found that mothers with primary (OR: 0.48, CI: 0.18, 0.95), secondary or tertiary (OR: 0.41, 95 % CI: 0.22, 0.97) were less likely to give birth assisted by a traditional birth attendant compared to mothers with no education. Mothers age at last birth, birth order, and/ or family type (nuclear vs. extended) had no influence on the prediction of assistance at the time of delivery (Table 10).

Table 10.

Logistic regression estimates for assistance at delivery of respondents

Independent variable Regression coefficient Odds ratio = Exp (B) 95 % C.I. for Exp (B)
Lower Upper
Mother’s age at last birth
 Less than 25 years (RC) 1.00
 25 years and more 0.009 1.009 0.475 2.142
Birth order
 First birth (RC) 1.00
 Second birth and more 0.626 1.871 0.832 4.208
Family type
 Nuclear family (RC) 1.00
 Extended family 0.057 1.059 .438 2.558
Mother’s education
 No education (RC) 1.00
 Primary −.783 0.457* 0.179 0.948
 Secondary and more −0.887 0.412* 0.216 0.968
Constant −1.024 .359
HosmerLomshow test = Chi-square 1.72, sig. 0.786
−2 Log likelihood = 357.33
Nagelekerke R. = 0.056

* = p <0.05, RC reference category

Discussion

All the survey respondents were rural people of a geographically adverse area, with little formal education whose livelihood is mainly based on agriculture. Haors occupy a large portion of Bangladesh, and this region is typically inaccessible, with the plains being submerged under water for more than 6 months of the year, causing transport and communication facilities to become very poor. The study found that among ANC receivers half of the women seek ANC from government healthcare institutions, i.e. Upazila Health Complex or Union Family Welfare Centre. This percentage is lower than the national average for rural women of Bangladesh who received ANC from government facilities [3]. Receiving ANC services from medically trained personnel is very important for the wellbeing of mothers and new-born children. The number of ANC visits and the timing of the first check-up are both considered important in detecting and preventing an adverse pregnancy outcome. As per the World Health Organization (WHO) standard, every pregnant woman should receive ANC within the first trimester irrespective of any problem faced by them. This study’s survey respondents only seek ANC when they face a particular problem, and the percentage is very low (6.8 %) compared to the national average. This may be due to low level of education, lack of awareness, etc. Moreover, the study also found that a lack of money is the prominent reason for not seeking ANC. This finding is supported by the low economic status of the respondents.

Half of the respondents mentioned transportation problems as a reason for not seeking ANC. In the study area, transportation and communication systems are not well developed, and the means of transportation available for going to the healthcare institutions such as boats and rickshaws are very limited. Within this adverse geographic location, it was observed that mothers who had higher educational attainment were far more likely to use ANC. However, the education level of the mothers’ in the study area was very low compared to the national average [1].

Delivery care is another component of MHC, which is assessed by the place of delivery and assistance during the delivery. The percentage of deliveries at healthcare facilities in the study area was approximately half the national average for rural areas [3]. Deliveries attended by untrained traditional birth attendants were higher than the national average of 62.5 %. Postnatal check-ups provide an opportunity to assess and treat delivery complications and to counsel mothers on how to care for themselves and their newborns. Younger women, educated mothers and mothers who have husbands with higher education levels received more PNC. The percentage of women and infants who received PNC was also much lower than the national average. National statistics show that 29 % of women and 30 % of children received PNC from medically trained providers within 42 days after delivery [3]. A number of factors contribute to not seeking PNC, including lack of money, lack of need of the PNC services, prohibitive cost, transportation problems, etc. The majority of the respondents (85 %) opined that regular check-ups were not needed. This implies that they do not seek any care if they do not face any problem. However, we know from the literature that postnatal visits should be made within two days after giving birth [24]. Bivariate analysis of receiving PNC and different socio-economic and demographic factors revealed that only variables like mother’s age at birth, mother’s education, and husband’s level of education were significantly associated with receiving PNC.

Limitations

There are several limitations of the present study. While conducting the interviews, we had to depend on the information provided by mothers. Information could, thus, have been subject to recall bias. However, we were careful in collecting the data they provided and in the analysis and interpretation of the results. The findings are only generalizable to the haor areas since the studied socio-demographic and economic characteristics are different from the populations in other parts of the country.

Conclusions

The utilization of MHC in the haor area is below the standard level. The status of main indicators of MHC utilization such as receiving ANC from medically trained providers, giving birth at a health facility, delivery assisted by medically trained providers, receiving PNC for mother and new-born baby from medically trained providers, are all below the national average. Only mothers’ education and mothers’ age at last birth influenced the utilization of ANC, birth facilities, and the use of trained providers. In this study, mothers’ age at birth, birth order, mothers’ education, husbands’ education, family type, and family income were found to be associated with MHC utilization. Improved MHC utilization can reduce maternal mortality and maternal morbidity. To achieve the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3.1, MHC utilization must be improved in remote parts of the country. The study, therefore, concludes that the Bangladesh government needs to act deliberately to address the factors responsible for the observed MHC utilization differential in haor areas compared to other regions of the country.

Abbreviations

ANC, antenatal care; DGFP, directorate general of family planning; DGHS, directorate general of health services; ESP, essential service package; GO, government organization; MBBS, bachelor of medicine and bachelor of surgery; MDG, millennium development goals; MHC, maternal health care; MMR, maternal mortality ratio; MOHFW, ministry of health and family welfare; NGO, non-government organization; PNC, post-natal care; SDG, sustainable development goals; SMPP, safe motherhood promotion project

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Department of Population Sciences, University of Dhaka and the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), Bangladesh for supporting the study. We are also grateful to all the families who contributed directly and indirectly to the study. We wish to thank Drs. Mary Shaw and Kalai Mathee, Professor at Florida International University for their very helpful advice in revising the manuscript. We are thankful to Jeanette Garcia, Graduate Consultant, Writing Centre, and Florida International University for her help in copy editing. The authors are also thankful to Mr. Michael Jones for copy editing the manuscript. We are also thankful to the editor and reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestion which led to significant improvements of the manuscript.

Funding

UNFPA Bangladesh had a joint funding collaboration with the Department of Population Sciences and Mr. Das received a merit scholarship of US $1000.00 for conducting the study.

Availability of data and materials

Dataset and other material used in this article can be accessed by request to the lead author.

Authors’ contributions

MAH: Had the original idea for the study, planned the study, drafted the manuscript, revised it critically for important intellectual content, handled supervision of overall work, and final approval of the version to be submitted. SKD: Helped in data collection, analysed the data, and drafted the manuscript. MABC: Revised critically for important intellectual content, helped in statistical interpretation, contributed in addressing reviewers’ comments, and final approval of the version to be submitted. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

The results have been approved for publication by The Research Evaluation Board and Academic Committee of the Department of Population Sciences, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh. Also, the manuscript does not contain any identifiable individual data including individual details, images or video.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval and consent to conduct the study was approved by The Research Evaluation Board and Academic Committee of the Department of Population Sciences, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh. Informed consent was received from the study participants before enrolling them in the study.

Footnotes

1

Lowest administrative unit in Bangladesh.

Contributor Information

Md. Aminul Haque, Email: aminul.haque@du.ac.bd.

Surjya Kanta Dash, Email: surjya99@gmail.com.

Muhammad Abdul Baker Chowdhury, Email: mchow023@fiu.edu.

References

  • 1.BBS. Report on Sample Vital Registration System (SVRS)-2013. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS): Dhaka; 2015.
  • 2.Mitra S, Ali M, Islam S, Cross A, Saha T. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey, 2004. NIPORT, Mitra and Associates and ORC Macro International Inc. Ministry of Planning 2005.
  • 3.NIPORT, Evaluation M, ICDDR B . Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) 2011. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Safe Motherhood Promotion Project (SMPP) [http://www.carebangladesh.org/publication/Publication_1114025.pdf]. Accessed 13 Jul 2016.
  • 5.NIPORT, Evaluation; M, ICDDR B . Bangladesh Maternal Mortality and Health Care Survey 2010. Dhaka: NIPORT, MEASURE Evaluation, and ICDDR,B; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.BBS. Health and Morbidity Status Survey 2012. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS): Dhaka; 2013.
  • 7.NIPORT, Associaltes; Ma, Macro O . Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2004. Dhaka: National Institute of Population Research and Training, Mitra and Associates, and ORC Macro; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Starrs AM. Safe motherhood initiative: 20 years and counting. Lancet. 2006;368(9542):1130–1132. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69385-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.UN. United Nations Millennium Declaration: Resolution. United Nations (UN); 2000. http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ares552e.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan 2016.
  • 10.GoB GB. Millennium Development Goals: Bangladesh Progress Report 2013. Dhaka: Planning Commission Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bangladesh BU. Progotir Pothe: Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2012–13. Dhaka: Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics and UNICEF Bangladesh; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.GED . Millennium Development Goals: Bangladesh Progress Report 2013. Dhaka: Support to Sustainable and Inclusive Planning (SSIP) Project, General Economics Division, Planning Commission. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh & UNDP Bangladesh; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM, Van Look PF. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet. 2006;367(9516):1066–1074. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68397-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Starrs A. The safe motherhood action agenda: priorities for the next decade. Proceedings. The Washington, DC: World Bank; 1997. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/1997/10/442078/safe-safemotherhood-action-agenda-priorities-next-decade.
  • 15.Stanton CK. Methodological issues in the measurement of birth preparedness in support of safe motherhood. Eval Rev. 2004;28:179–200. doi:10.1177/0193841X03262577. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 16.Miller S, Sloan NL, Winikoff B, Langer A, Fikree FF. Where is the “E” in MCH? The need for an evidence-based approach in safe motherhood. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2003;48(1):10–8. doi:10.1016/S1526-9523(02)00369-0. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 17.Moran AC, Winch PJ, Sultana N, Kalim N, Afzal KM, Koblinsky M, Arifeen SE, Seraji MHR, Mannan I, Darmstadt GL, Baqui, AH; The Bangladesh PROJAHNMO Maternal Morbidity Study Group. Patterns of maternal care seeking behaviours in rural Bangladesh. Tropical Med Int Health. 2007;12:823–32. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01852.x [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 18.Macro O. Bangladesh Maternal Health Services and Maternal Mortality Survey, 2001. Dhaka, Bangladesh: National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT); 2003.
  • 19.Chakraborty N, Islam MA, Chowdhury RI, Bari W, Akhter HH. Determinants of the use of maternal health services in rural Bangladesh. Health Promot Int. 2003;18(4):327–337. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dag414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vasudevan L, Labrique AB, Mehra S, Wu L, Levine O, Feikin D, Klemm R, Christian P, West KP., Jr Maternal determinants of timely vaccination coverage among infants in rural Bangladesh. Vaccine. 2014;32(42):5514–5519. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.06.092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gibson-Helm M, Boyle J, Cheng IH, East C, Knight M, Teede H. Maternal health and pregnancy outcomes among women of refugee background from Asian countries. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;129(2):146–151. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.10.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Campbell OMR, Graham WJ. Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. Lancet. 2006;368(9543):1284–1299. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69381-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.El Arifeen S, Hill K, Ahsan KZ, Jamil K, Nahar Q, Streatfield PK. Maternal mortality in Bangladesh: a Countdown to 2015 country case study. Lancet. 2014;384(9951):1366–1374. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60955-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.WHO . Pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum and newborn care: a guide for essential practice and essential newborn care course. Geneva: WHO; 2010. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Dataset and other material used in this article can be accessed by request to the lead author.


Articles from BMC Public Health are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES