Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2015 Dec 8;210(2):669–679. doi: 10.1111/nph.13778

Structural polymorphisms and distinct genomic composition suggest recurrent origin and ongoing evolution of B chromosomes in the Prospero autumnale complex (Hyacinthaceae)

Tae‐Soo Jang 1, John S Parker 2, Hanna Weiss‐Schneeweiss 1,✉
PMCID: PMC4949986  PMID: 26643365

Summary

  • Supernumerary B chromosomes (Bs) are genomic parasitic components, originating from the A complement via chromosomal rearrangements, which follow their own evolutionary trajectories. They often contain repetitive DNAs, some shared with regular chromosomes and some newly evolved. Genomic composition, origin and evolution of Bs have been analysed in the chromosomally variable Prospero autumnale complex.

  • Two rDNAs and a satellite DNA (PaB6) from regular chromosomes were mapped to Bs of 26 plants from three diploid cytotypes, their hybrids and polyploid derivatives. In homoploid diploid hybrids, genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) allowed B painting with the parental DNAs.

  • Bs were structurally variable and highly enriched in 5S rDNA and satDNA PaB6, and rarely in 35S rDNA. Eleven combinations of rDNA and PaB6 localization were observed. The quantities of PaB6 in Bs and regular chromosomes were not correlated, suggesting amplification mechanisms other than recombination. PaB6 and 5S rDNA amounts increased with increasing ploidy level. GISH revealed two independent origins of Bs.

  • The structural variation, repeat content, repeat‐type fluctuations and differing genomic affinities of Bs in different cytotypes suggest that they represent young proto‐B chromosomes. Bs in P. autumnale probably form recurrently as by‐products of the extensive genome restructuring within this chromosomally variable species complex.

Keywords: B‐chromosome evolution, B‐chromosome painting, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), genomic in situ hybridization (GISH), polyploids, Prospero autumnale complex, rDNA (5S and 35S rDNA), satellite DNA PaB6

Introduction

Karyotypes of many species contain supernumerary genetic material, either as free B chromosomes (Bs) or inserted on standard chromosomes as supernumerary chromosomal segments (SCSs). SCSs are more frequent in insects than in plants, but are most notable in the monocotyledonous family Hyacinthaceae (Greilhuber & Speta, 1978; Ruiz Rejón & Oliver, 1981; Jamilena et al., 1995; Ebert et al., 1996; Garrido‐Ramos et al., 1998; Weiss‐Schneeweiss et al., 2004). B chromosomes, by contrast, have been reported in numerous species of animals, fungi and flowering plants (Jones, 1995; Camacho et al., 2000). In plants, they are more common in monocots than in dicots, with hot spots in Liliales and Commelinales (Levin et al., 2005). B frequencies in diploids and polyploids are similar (Jones & Rees, 1982; Trivers et al., 2004), but are higher in families with large genome sizes (Trivers et al., 2004; Levin et al., 2005; Jones et al., 2008).

B chromosomes do not recombine with the A complement and so are exempted from strictly Mendelian inheritance and follow their own evolutionary trajectories (Camacho et al., 2000; Jones et al., 2008; Houben et al., 2013). Bs are most frequently found in low numbers (0–5), but as many as 34 have been reported in an individual of Zea mays (Jones & Rees, 1982; Jones et al., 2008). They are usually smaller than the standard complement and vary in size from dot‐like micro‐Bs (Houben et al., 1997, 2013; Jones et al., 2008) to chromosomes as large as the smallest chromosomes of the regular set (Jones et al., 2008). Their size and structure are often stable within taxa (Secale cereale: Marques et al., 2012, 2013), but plants carrying more than one structural B type are well known (Guillén & Ruiz Rejón, 1984; Parker et al., 1991).

The occurrence of Bs in phylogenetically unrelated groups indicates their independent and multiple origins (Levin et al., 2005). Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the origins of Bs from A chromosomes (Levin et al., 2005; Sharbel et al., 2005; Jones et al., 2008; Martis et al., 2012; Houben et al., 2013; Weiss‐Schneeweiss & Schneeweiss, 2013), with most favouring their origin as a by‐product of chromosomal rearrangements of the regular (A) set of chromosomes stimulated by hybridization or polyploidization (Jones & Houben, 2003; Houben et al., 2013). Recent support for this hypothesis has come from the genera Plantago (Dhar et al., 2002) and, in particular, Secale (Martis et al., 2012). Newly arisen chromosomal fragments often accumulate sufficient differences in structure and/or chromatin composition to ensure their meiotic isolation from A chromosomes, and establish meiotic and mitotic drive mechanisms to secure their own transmission to the next host generation (Langdon et al., 2000; Marschner et al., 2007; Jones et al., 2008; Banaei‐Moghaddam et al., 2012; Klemme et al., 2013).

During their evolution, Bs capture coding and noncoding DNA sequences from A chromosomes (Małuszyńska & Schweizer, 1989; Dhar et al., 2002; Kubaláková et al., 2003; Carchilan et al., 2009; Banaei‐Moghaddam et al., 2012; Marques et al., 2012) and from organellar DNAs (Martis et al., 2012; Ruban et al., 2014), but novel B‐specific repeats also evolve (Langdon et al., 2000; Martis et al., 2012; Klemme et al., 2013). Despite their abundance, the roles of Bs remain enigmatic, although many different effects on the carrier organism have been demonstrated, including influences on A‐chromosome meiotic pairing (Jones et al., 2008; Houben et al., 2013).

An attractive system in which to establish patterns of B‐chromosome evolution is the genus Prospero (Hyacinthaceae). P. autumnale, one of three species of this genus, is itself a complex which includes four evolutionarily well‐established diploid cytotypes (AA, B5B5, B6B6, B7B7; Jang et al., 2013). Each cytotype is characterized by a unique combination of basic chromosome number, genome size and pattern of rDNA and satellite DNA PaB6 distribution (Jang et al., 2013; Emadzade et al., 2014). Polyploidy is frequent in the complex, resulting in autopolyploids of genome B7 (x = 7), most commonly 4x and 6x, but up to 20x (Ainsworth, 1981; Ebert, 1993; Speta, 1993, 2000), and two classes of allopolyploids – of A (x = 7) and B7 origin, and of B6 (x = 6) and B7 origin (Vaughan et al., 1997; Jang, 2013). Bs have been reported in three of the four diploid cytotypes (the exception is the most recently evolved cytotype, B5B5, x = 5; Ruiz Rejón et al., 1980; Ebert et al., 1996; Taylor, 1997), and in a range of polyploids (Ebert, 1993; Taylor, 1997). The Bs vary in size and structure between and within cytotypes, and between and within individuals (Ruiz Rejón et al., 1980; Parker et al., 1991; Ebert, 1993; Taylor, 1997).

Recently, molecular tools for analysing the evolution of chromosomes in Prospero have been developed (Jang et al., 2013; Emadzade et al., 2014; Jang & Weiss‐Schneeweiss, 2015), which have allowed construction of a phylogenetic framework of the P. autumnale complex. In this study, B‐chromosome structure and repeat composition have been analysed in 26 B‐carrying plants of diploid and polyploid cytotypes in the complex using 35S and 5S rDNA probes, along with a species‐specific and evolutionarily dynamic tandem repeat PaB6 (Emadzade et al., 2014). The degree of amplification of PaB6 and the rDNAs has been compared between the A complement and the accompanying Bs. A recurrent origin of Bs has been established using genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) in B‐carrying diploid hybrids. The mode of B meiotic pairing has also been analysed. The results are discussed in the context of de novo origin of Bs in different cytotypes, and in relation to the high amounts of chromosomal restructuring of the regular chromosome sets of P. autumnale.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials

In total, 26 plants of the P. autumnale (L.) Speta complex containing Bs were analysed (Table 1). Fifteen were diploid (three of cytotype AA, eight B7B7, one B6B6, one hybrid AB7, two hybrids B6B7) and 11 were polyploid (three allopolyploids of B6 and B7 origin, and eight autopolyploids of genome B7). For cytological investigations, root meristems were pretreated with a solution of 0.05% colchicine for 4.5 h at room temperature, fixed in ethanol : acetic acid (3 : 1) for at least 3 h at room temperature and stored at −20°C until use. Young flower buds emerging from the bulb were fixed in ethanol : chloroform : acetic acid (6 : 3 : 1) and stored at −20°C.

Table 1.

Plant material of Prospero autumnale complex studied with detailed voucher information

Cytotype Locality; collection; accession number 2n
Diploids
AA + 1B Portugal, Peniche; Parker; H549 15
Spain, Jaén; Parker; H623 15
AA + 2Bs Portugal, Peniche; Parker; H560 16
AB7 + 3Bs Spain, Jaén; Parker; H546 17
B7B7 + 1B Greece, Crete; Speta; H209 15
B7B7 + 2Bs Montenegro; Speta; H415a 16
Greece, Crete; Speta; H526 16
B7B7 + 4Bs Greece, Crete; Speta; H537 18
Greece, Skopelos; Parker; H620 18
B7B7 + 5Bs Montenegro; Speta; H412a 19
B7B7 + 6Bs Italy, Sicily; Speta; H257 20
Montenegro; Speta; H413 20
B6B6 + 1B Greece, Crete; Speta; H154‐1 13
B6B7 + 2Bs Greece, Crete; Weigl; H246 15
Greece, Crete; Speta; H525 15
Polyploids
B6B6B7B7 + 1B Greece, Crete; Speta; H213 28
B6B6B7B7 + 2Bs Greece, Crete; Raus; H327 30
B7B7B7B7 + 1B Montenegro; Speta; H384 29
Spain, Biscay; Parker; H624 29
B7B7B7B7B7 + 1B Greece, Crete; Jahn; H339‐1 36
B7B7B7B7B7 + 3Bs Greece, Karpathos; Raus; H336 38
B7B7B7B7B7 + 4Bs Greece, Crete; Jahn; H159 39
B7B7B7B7B7B7 + 1B Greece, Crete; Speta; H536 43
B6B6B7B7B7B7 + 3Bs Greece, Crete; Speta; H121 45
B7B7B7B7B7B7 + 4Bs Tunisia; Speta; H303 46
Tunisia; Speta; H405 46
Open in a new tab
a

Material used also for meiotic analyses.

Karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

Chromosome numbers and karyotypes were analysed as described by Jang et al. (2013) using standard Feulgen staining. Chromosomal spreads for FISH were prepared by enzymatic digestion and squashing as described in Jang et al. (2013). Flower buds of plants with B7B7 + 5Bs and B7B7 + 2Bs were digested with 1% cellulase Onozuka (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany), 1% cytohelicase (Sigma‐Aldrich) and 1% pectolyase (Sigma‐Aldrich) for 70 min at 37°C.

Probes used for FISH were as follows: satellite DNA PaB6 isolated from the B6 genome in plasmid pGEM‐T Easy (Emadzade et al., 2014); 35S rDNA (18S/25S rDNA) from Arabidopsis thaliana in plasmid pSK+; and 5S rDNA from Melampodium montanum in plasmid pGEM‐T Easy, directly labelled with biotin or digoxygenin (Roche). The plastid probe represents complete plastid genome of Vicia faba (courtesy of Dr J. Macas, CAS, Czech Republic).

Probes were labelled either directly by PCR (5S rDNA and satellite DNA PaB6) or using a nick translation kit (35S rDNA and plastid probe; Roche). FISH was performed as described in Jang et al. (2013). Digoxygenin was detected with antidigoxygenin conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (5 μg ml−1: Roche) and biotin with ExtrAvidin conjugated with Cy3 (2 μg ml−1: Sigma‐Aldrich). Preparations were analysed with an AxioImager M2 epifluorescent microscope (Carl Zeiss), images captured with a charge‐coupled device (CCD) camera and processed using AxioVision ver. 4.8 (Carl Zeiss) with only those functions that apply to all pixels of the image equally.

Genomic in situ hybridization

Genomic in situ hybridization has been performed in two hybrid individuals, B6B7 (H246) and AB7 (H546), using parental diploid genomes DNA as probes (Table 1). Total genomic DNA from diploid cytotypes AA, B6B6 and B7B7 was isolated using the CTAB method (Jang et al., 2013) and sheared at 98°C for 5 min. Approx. 1 μg of genomic DNA of each cytotype was labelled using either digoxigenin or biotin nick translation kit (Roche).

Genomic in situ hybridization was carried out following the method described by Jang & Weiss‐Schneeweiss (2015) after standard chromosome preparations pretreatment (Jang et al., 2013). The hybridization mix for hybrids containing the B6 genome was modified by addition of unlabelled satellite DNA PaB6 monomers. The satellite DNA PaB6 repeats are present in high copy numbers in cytotype B6B6 and thus, to block these loci and increase GISH performance (noise‐to‐signal ratio), the excess of unlabelled PaB6 monomers was added to the GISH hybridization mix (Emadzade et al., 2014; Jang & Weiss‐Schneeweiss, 2015). Briefly, the hybridization mix included 10% dextran sulphate (Sigma‐Aldrich), 0.02 × saline sodium citrate (SSC) buffer, 1% salmon sperm (Sigma‐Aldrich), 20× access of satellite DNA PaB6 (for hybrid B6B7containing B6 genome) and 3–4 ng μl−1 of each genomic DNA probe; 10 μl of hybridization mix was applied per slide. After hybridization, slides were washed three times in 2 × SSC at 42°C for 3 min each. Probes were detected as described for FISH. All preparations were analysed with an AxioImager M2 epifluorescent microscope (Carl Zeiss), and images were captured with a CCD camera and processed using AxioVision v.4.8 (Carl Zeiss) with only those functions that apply to all pixels of the image equally.

Results

The number of Bs varied from one to six per individual, but most frequently a single B chromosome was present. B morphology was variable with acro‐, submeta‐ and metacentrics (Supporting Information Fig. S1). B length also varied, from 1.75 to 4.79 μm (Table 2). B morphology was rather uniform in AA diploids, but varied significantly between plants possessing the B7 genome (Table 2). The most variable Bs were observed in B7 autopolyploids (Table 2).

Table 2.

Basic morphology and length of B chromosomes (Bs) in Prospero autumnale complex

Cytotypes 2n Absolute length of B chromosomes (μm)a Type of Bs Figures Accession number
1 2 3 4 5 6
P. autumnale complex
Diploids
AA + 1B 14 + 1B 2.78m 1‐1 1a, 2a H549
AA + 1B 14 + 1B 2.92s 1‐1 – H623
AA + 2Bs 14 + 2Bs 2.05m 2.14m 1‐1 1b, 2b H560
AB7 + 3Bs 14 + 3Bs 2.49s 2.74s 2.76s 1‐2 1c, 2c, 4d H546
B6B6 + 1B 12 + 1B 2.92s 4 1i, 2j H154‐1
B6B7 + 2Bs 13 + 2Bs 2.55s 2.61s 5, 6 1j, 2k, 4c H246
B6B7 + 2Bs 13 + 2Bs 3.13s 3.33s 7 – H525
B7B7 + 1B 14 + 1B 3.37s 2 1d, 2d H209
B7B7 + 2Bs 14 + 2Bs 2.14s 2.20s 7 4b H415
B7B7 + 2Bs 14 + 2Bs 2.80m 2.93m 7 1e, 2e H526
B7B7 + 4Bs 14 + 4Bs 2.50s 3.33a 3.33a 3.33a 7 – H537
B7B7 + 4Bs 14 + 4Bs 2.71a 2.90a 2.94m 3.20s 7 1f, 2f H620
B7B7 + 5Bs 14 + 5Bs 1.81s 1.88a 1.88s 1.92s 2.28s 3 1g, 2g–h, 4a H412
B7B7 + 6Bs 14 + 6Bs 2.29m 2.42m 2.42m 2.50m 2.50m 2.71m 5 – H257
B7B7 + 6Bs 14 + 6Bs 2.07a 2.11s 2.21m 2.22a 2.32m 2.34s 7 1h, 2i H413
Polyploids
B6B6B7B7 + 1B 27 + 1B 2.63m 8 1p, 2s H213
B6B6B7B7 + 2Bs 28 + 2Bs 1.82s 2.11s 7 2t H327
B7B7B7B7 + 1B 28 + 1B 1.88m 9 1l, 2m H384
B7B7B7B7 + 1B 28 + 1B 4.79s 4 1k, 2l H624
B7B7B7B7B7 + 1B 35 + 1B 2.02m 10 1m, 2n H339‐1
B7B7B7B7B7 + 3Bs 35 + 3Bs 1.75s 2.47m 2.78s 8 2o H336
B7B7B7B7B7 + 4Bs 35 + 4Bs 3.00m 3.05s 3.21s 3.27s 7 1n H159
B7B7B7B7B7B7 + 1B 42 + 1B 3.29m 11 1o, 2p H536
B6B6B7B7B7B7 + 3Bs2 42 + 3Bs – – – 5 2u H121
B7B7B7B7B7B7 + 4Bs2 42 + 4Bs – – – – 7 2q H303
B7B7B7B7B7B7 + 4Bs 42 + 4Bs 2.43m 2.54m 2.91m 3.10m 7 2r H405
Open in a new tab
a

Chromosome types (indicated in superscript): a, acrocentric; m, metacentric; and s, submetacentric; 2Bs of these individuals were not measured because it was impossible to identify them among all chromosomes in Feulgen‐stained preparations.

Tandem repeats in Bs

35S rDNA, 5S rDNA and satellite DNA PaB6 tandem repeats were mapped in mitotic and meiotic chromosomes of the standard complements and in their Bs (Tables 1, 2; Figs 1, 2, 3). Hybridization using plastid DNA regions (complete plastid DNA from Vicia faba) produced no discernible signals (Fig. S2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Localization of 35S (green) and 5S rDNA loci (red) in B chromosomes of diploid (a–j) and polyploid (k–p) individuals of the Prospero autumnale complex. (a) AA + 1B (H549); (b) AA + 2Bs (H560); (c) AA + 3BS (H546); (d) B7B7 + 1B (H209); (e) B7B7 + 2Bs (H526); (f) B7B7 + 4Bs (H620); (g) B7B7 + 5Bs (H412); (h) B7B7 + 6Bs (H413); (i) B6B6 + 1B (H154‐1); (j) B6B7 + 2Bs (H246); (k) B7B7B7B7 + 1B (H624); (l) B7B7B7B7 + 1B (H384); (m) B7B7B7B7B7 + 1B (H339‐1); (n) B7B7B7B7B7 + 4Bs (H159); (o) B7B7B7B7B7B7 + 1B (H536); (p) B6B6B7B7 + 1B (H213). Insets in (m), (n) and (p) show chromosomes of the same cell that could not be photographed together using a high magnification objective because they were lying at some distance from the main group of chromosomes. Arrows indicate Bs. Bars, 5 μm.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Localization of 5S rDNA (red signals) and satellite DNA PaB6 loci (green signals) in B chromosomes of diploid (a–k) and polyploid (l–u) individuals in the Prospero autumnale complex. Metaphase chromosomes were subjected to fluorescence in situ hybridization with 5S rDNA (red in all except for (g) where red depicts 35S rDNA) and 35S rDNA (green). (a) AA + 1B (H549); (b) AA + 2Bs (H560); (c) AA + 3BS (H546); (d) B7B7 + 1B (H209); (e) B7B7 + 2Bs (H526); (f) B7B7 + 4Bs (H620); (g, h) B7B7 + 5Bs (H412); (i) B7B7 + 6Bs (H413); (j) B6B6 + 1B (H154‐1); (k) B6B7 + 2Bs (H246); (l) B7B7B7B7 + 1B (H624); (m) B7B7B7B7 + 1B (H384); (n) B7B7B7B7B7 + 1B (H339‐1); (o) B7B7B7B7B7 + 3Bs (H336); (p) B7B7B7B7B7B7 + 1B (H536); (q) B7B7B7B7B7B7 + 4Bs (H303); (r) B7B7B7B7B7B7 + 4Bs (H405); (s) B6B6B7B7 + 1B (H213); (t) B6B6B7B7 + 2Bs (H327); (u) B6B6B7B7B7B7 + 3Bs (H121). Arrows indicate Bs. Bars, 5 μm.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Repetitive DNA distribution in different types of B chromosomes in the Prospero autumnale complex. The individual used as the source of chromosomes depicted in the figure is marked with asterisk. (a) Colocalization of 5S (red) and 35S rDNA (green). (b) Colocalization of 5S rDNA (red) and satellite DNA PaB6 repeats (green). Whole chromosomes were counterstained with 4′,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole (DAPI; blue). Bars, 1 μm.

35S and 5S rDNA repeats

Only one plant (H412; cytotype B7B7) carried Bs with detectable 35S rDNA repeats. All five acrocentric Bs in this plant possessed signals spread over their whole short arms and part of their long arms (Figs 1g, 3 type 3). No secondary constrictions were visible.

5S rDNA, by contrast, was detected in almost all the remaining Bs, with the exception of Bs in two B7B7 diploids (Fig. 3). The signals were weak and dot‐like in diploids (Figs 1a–j, 3 types 1–7) with the copy number increasing with ploidy level (Figs 1o,p, 3 types 8, 11). Only one B type had a clearly defined and very large 5S rDNA locus. It occupied an extensive pericentric region, which constituted more than half the B (found in allotetraploid and allopentaploids of B6 and B7 genomes; Figs 1p, 3 type 8). 5S rDNA was not detected in the Bs carrying 35S rDNA (Fig. 3 type 3).

Satellite DNA PaB6

Satellite DNA PaB6 was found in Bs of diploids and polyploids. Bs in polyploid backgrounds carried higher copy numbers of satDNA and the distribution was more variable (Table 2; Fig. 2). These differences were particularly evident in the B7 genome, in which entire Bs were painted by PaB6 in autopolyploids (Figs 2, 3). PaB6 and 5S rDNA were often amplified together in Bs, but usually occupied separate chromosomal regions (Fig. 3). The five Bs carrying 35S rDNA (in H412 of cytotype B7B7) also carried PaB6 in a distinct, nonoverlapping, chromosomal domain (Fig. 3 type 3).

In Bs of diploids, copy number and distribution of PaB6 were usually variable. Bs in AA diploids and in the AB7 hybrid were uniform in structure and in tandem repeat distribution. They were enriched in PaB6 (Fig. 3) in subterminal regions of both chromosomal arms (Figs 2a–c, 3 type 1a,b) although their amounts differed (Fig. 3). The B in the B6B6 diploid, by contrast, possessed a very low copy number of PaB6 (Figs 2j, 3 type 4), despite the high amount of this repeat in the regular complement (Figs 2j, 3 type 4).

B chromosomes in the B7 diploids were variable (Figs 2d–i, 3 types 2, 3, 5, 7), with the most common type mildly enhanced for PaB6 in the pericentric region but highly enriched subterminally in the long arm (types 3, 7). Bs of one B7B7 plant exhibited very high levels of PaB6 amplification, with nearly the whole B covered (type 5). In plant H209 of B7B7, a putative, large B showed clear pericentric localization of PaB6 typical of chromosomes of the standard complement, but with a much higher copy number (Figs 2d, 3 type 2); it lacked interstitial and distal PaB6 loci. One B6B7 hybrid carried two different B‐variants (H246, Figs 2k, 3, types 5, 6), while the other carried the B type typical of B7B7 diploids (type 7).

Overall, Bs in polyploids possessed the highest amounts of PaB6, which typically painted whole Bs (types 9–11), although with signals slightly less prominent in short arms. One B7 autotetraploid (H624) carried a B with a very low level of PaB6 amplification, distributed in small foci over the whole chromosome (Fig. 3 type 4). B6B7 allopolyploids (4x and 6x) mainly carried the Bs characteristic of B7 diploids (types 5 and 7). One new variant (type 8), however, was found, in which PaB6 was amplified in multiple small loci over the whole chromosome length (H213, 4x; H336, 5x).

B chromosomes in diploids and polyploids

Based on the patterns given by the three DNA repeats, 11 distinct B types have been identified in only 26 plants of the P. autumnale complex (Fig. 3). Seven B types have been identified in 14 diploids (types 1–7) and three of these (types 4, 5, 7) were also found in polyploids, with type 7 being the most prevalent (four occurrences). Four further B types were found uniquely in the sample of only five polyploids (types 8–11). A major difference between Bs in diploids and polyploids was the enhanced amplification of the 5S rDNA and satellite DNA repeats in polyploids.

Meiotic behaviour of Bs in diploids

Meiotic behaviour of Bs in two B7 diploids revealed different patterns of pairing (Fig. 4). In neither did the Bs pair with standard chromosomes. The five Bs in H412, enriched in PaB6 and 35S rDNA, were present as univalents (22 cells; Fig. 4a). By contrast, the two Bs of H415, with PaB6 and 5S rDNA repeats, regularly formed a bivalent (26 cells; Fig. 4b).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with rDNA (red) and satellite DNA PaB6 (green), and genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) in the Prospero autumnale complex. (a, b) Meiotic metaphase I of two Prospero autumnale individuals carrying B chromosomes: (a) cytotype B7B7 with five Bs (H412; 35S rDNA in red; PaB6 in green); (b) cytotype B7B7 with two Bs (H415; 5S rDNA in red; PaB6 in green). (c, d) GISH in diploid homoploid hybrid individuals carrying Bs: (c) localization of B6 (green) and B7 (red) genomic DNA in B6B7 with two Bs (H246); (d) localization of A (green) and B7 (red) genomic DNA in AB 7 with three Bs (H546). Arrows indicate Bs. Bars, 5 μm.

Genomic DNA affinities of Bs

The relationships of Bs to parental genomes were examined using GISH in two different diploid hybrids which were first‐generation crosses – B6B7 with two Bs (H246; types 5, 6) and AB7 with three Bs (H546; type 1–2). These Bs, therefore, had not undergone meiosis in their current genomic backgrounds. Hybridizations with labelled parental genomic DNAs were carried out.

The Bs in the B6B7 hybrid had a higher affinity for the DNA probe of the B7 than the B6 genome; they also carried PaB6 in subterminal positions on their long arms (Fig. 4c). The Bs of the AB7 hybrid were painted by the A genome alone, although the intensity of hybridization was slightly lower than that displayed by the standard A chromosomes (Fig. 4d).

Discussion

Structural variation of Bs in the P. autumnale complex

B chromosomes in P. autumnale are, with a single exception, smaller than the smallest standard chromosome (Ainsworth, 1981; Ainsworth et al., 1983; Table 2). Bs, highly variable in structure and heterochromatin composition, have previously been reported in diploids and polyploids of P. autumnale (Ruiz Rejón et al., 1980; Parker et al., 1991; Ebert, 1993; Taylor, 1997) and the Bs in the current study represent a subset of those described. Telocentrics, acrocentrics and metacentrics have previously been documented (Ruiz Rejón et al., 1980; Hong, 1982; Guillén & Ruiz Rejón, 1984; Parker et al., 1991; Ebert et al., 1996), but no telocentrics were included in the current sample. As many as 11 B types were observed based on B morphology but mainly on the distribution of tandem repeats in the Bs (Fig. 3) of the 26 individuals analysed here, representing all available cytotypes. The previous studies of Bs have described numerical and morphological variation using standard Feulgen staining, but heterochromatin content and distribution were established in only two plants (one B6B6, one B7B7; Ebert et al., 1996).

The Bs of the AA cytotype studied here are all rather uniform in structure and nearly identical to the common variant previously reported in AA diploids from Spain and Portugal (Parker et al., 1991). Cytotype B7B7 showed the highest amount of structural B variation, both here and in previous investigations (Ainsworth, 1981; Ebert, 1993; Ebert et al., 1996; Taylor, 1997). While this diversity might simply reflect the higher number of B7B7 plants examined, it may also indicate multiple, independent origins of Bs within the B7 genome lineage, which is widespread across the whole Mediterranean Basin (Vaughan et al., 1997; Jang et al., 2013). Structural polymorphisms of Bs have been reported in many other organisms, both plant and insect (Lopez‐Leon et al., 1993; Jones, 1995). In Allium schoenoprasum, for example, 13 different B forms have been described in Welsh populations (Bougourd & Parker, 1979; Holmes & Bougourd, 1989), while in two species of Aster, as many as 29 variants have been identified in studies involving hundreds of populations (reviewed in Jones, 1995).

B chromosomes and repetitive DNA accumulation

Studies of heterochromatin in Bs of two B7B7 plants reported submetacentrics with pericentric dot‐like C bands, and acrocentrics with either blocks or dot‐like small heterochromatic loci in subterminal, interstitial and/or pericentromeric regions (Ebert, 1993). This corresponds to part of the B variation seen here. Ebert et al. (1996) also reported Bs in B6B6 plants, structurally similar to those found in the current study. These Bs had no C bands, and so agree with observations made here that Bs in the B6 cytotype have low numbers of tandem repeats of rDNA and PaB6.

Large insertions of plastid and mitochondrial DNA sequences are sometimes detected in plant Bs (Martis et al., 2012; Klemme et al., 2013; Ruban et al., 2014), although none have been found in P. autumnale Bs. Bs frequently share repeat families with the A complement, but also accumulate B‐specific families (Langdon et al., 2000; Dhar et al., 2002; Marques et al., 2012; Martis et al., 2012). Bs of P. autumnale share three repeat families with the A complement – 5S and 35S rDNAs and the Prospero‐specific satellite DNA PaB6. Although PaB6 is evolutionarily very dynamic and has accompanied diversification of diploid cytotypes and their polyploid derivatives in P. autumnale (Jang, 2013; Emadzade et al., 2014), amplification levels in Bs are not correlated with those in their respective standard complements. No B‐specific repeats have yet been found in P. autumnale Bs, although analyses to detect them are under way.

In the phylogenetically well‐defined cytotype AA, all Bs have similar repetitive DNA content and distribution, which parallel their structural uniformity. The A genome is geographically restricted to the Iberian Peninsula and may have become isolated from the B7 genome during the most recent glacial era (Parker et al., 1991; Jang et al., 2013). This may have led to the fixation of a single type of B (Parker et al., 1991). By contrast, eight different B‐types were found in the widespread B7B7 diploid and its derivative polyploids. The five B types found exclusively in B7 autopolyploids might have originated from the most common B type found in diploids, by large‐scale amplification of PaB6 and/or 5S rDNA and subsequent divergence.

B chromosomes of polyploids generally had higher PaB6 and 5S rDNA amplification levels than those of diploids, suggesting a positive correlation between these two traits. This may be related to the higher amounts of genome restructuring in polyploids than in diploids within this species complex (Jang, 2013; Weiss‐Schneeweiss et al., 2013). No comparable data yet exist for other plant genera.

The lack of meiotic pairing between Bs and standard chromosomes precludes recombination as a direct mechanism mediating spread of PaB6 and rDNA repeats in Bs. Extrachromosomal circular DNAs may facilitate spread and homogenization of tandem repeats (eccDNAs; Cohen et al., 2008; Navrátilová et al., 2008), and these should be sought within Prospero. The widespread presence of 5S rDNA repeats in Bs suggests that they originated from standard chromosomes carrying 5S rDNA (chromosome 1 and/or 2; Jang et al., 2013). However, extrachromosomal circular DNAs have again been suggested as a mechanism of spread of this repeat (Cohen et al., 2008, 2010).

On the origin of Bs in P. autumnale

The P. autumnale complex is chromosomally very variable and dynamic so high degrees of variation in structure and repeat composition of Bs are immediately suggestive of their independent and multiple origins. However, structural and repeat content polymorphisms have also been demonstrated in plant groups in which the Bs were shown to be of a single, unique origin (Martis et al., 2012; Marques et al., 2013; Ruban et al., 2014).

The P. autumnale cytotypes are genomically very similar to each other and their repetitive DNA fractions share > 90% similarity (Emadzade et al., 2014; H. Weiss‐Schneeweiss et al., unpublished). The standard GISH technique was ineffective in resolving such similar parental genomes, but recently a modified formamide‐free GISH technique has allowed clear identification of parental genomes in hybrids (Jang & Weiss‐Schneeweiss, 2015). This formamide‐free GISH was used in this study to test for the recurrent origin of Bs using two diploid homoploid hybrids – B6B7 (with type 5 Bs) and AB7 (with type 1–2 Bs). The results indicated different genomic affinities of these two B types, one similar to the B7 genome (type 5; B6B7 hybrid) and the other to the A genome (type 1–2; AB7 hybrid). It has so far proved impossible to use GISH on Bs in polyploids, because of the high levels of amplification of PaB6 and 5S rDNA. Both repeats produce strong signals which obscure the genomic affinities of Bs even if they are used in high concentrations as unlabelled blocking DNA (Jang & Weiss‐Schneeweiss, 2015).

The GISH results give a conservative estimate of two origins of Bs in diploids, one in AA cytotype (type 1) and one in B7 cytotype (type 5); other types could potentially have evolved from type 4 by differential repeat amplification or removal. However, an independent origin is also likely for the B in the B6 cytotype (type 4), perhaps indicated by the lack of repeats in this B. This study thus provides the first evidence of recurrent B formation in P. autumnale and investigation will now be extended to the population level.

The genus Prospero has been estimated to originate 6–7 million yr ago (Ma) (Ali et al., 2011), and P. autumnale only c. 1 Ma (K. Emadzade et al., unpublished). Neither Bs nor polyploidy have been found in the two other Prospero species, Prospero obtusifolium and Prospero hanburyi (Jang et al., 2013). Thus, the Bs in Prospero are probably evolutionarily very young. Despite this, the Bs are well established and widespread, and do not pair at meiosis with the regular chromosome complement.

B chromosomes in polyploids of P. autumnale were mainly found in the widespread and common autopolyploids of genome B7, or else in allopolyploids involving B7. Whether these Bs share a common origin or have originated independently and accumulated the same repeats during polyploid genome restructuring will require further study, perhaps using the new formamide‐free GISH technique.

Prospero autumnale is a young and chromosomally extremely variable species complex, with diploid cytotypes evolving from an ancestral genome on different evolutionary timescales. It has undergone, and continues to undergo, chromosomal fusions, inversions and translocations accompanied by changes in the repeatome and DNA amounts (Ainsworth et al., 1983; Jang et al., 2013). Bs perhaps represent recent and recurrent by‐products of these extensive chromosomal changes, thus following the mode of B‐chromosome formation elegantly demonstrated in Secale (Martis et al., 2012) or cichlid fish (Valente et al., 2014). Polyploidy provides an additional level of chromosomal complexity in P. autumnale, which may itself provide a stimulus to genome restructuring and B generation.

Conclusions

B chromosomes in the chromosomally variable species complex P. autumnale provide an excellent system in which to address their origin and evolution. The extent of variation of Bs is extraordinarily high and only the minimal level of variation has so far been assessed. The data suggest a recurrent origin of proto‐B chromosomes in P. autumnale, which are then dynamically evolving. This hypothesis will now be tested on a larger scale, involving populational and biogeographical analyses. Analyses of meiotic and postmeiotic behaviour could offer insights into the modes and mechanisms of B transmission.

Author contributions

H.W‐S. and T‐S.J. planned and designed the research. T‐S.J. performed experiments. T‐S.J., J.S.P. and H.W‐S. analysed the data and wrote the manuscript.

Supporting information

Please note: Wiley Blackwell are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the New Phytologist Central Office.

Fig. S1 Structure of B chromosomes in 24 of 26 analysed individuals of Prospero autumnale.

Fig. S2 Localization of plastid DNA sequences and satellite DNA PaB6 loci in B chromosomes of the Prospero autumnale complex.

Click here for additional data file. (562.4KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

Financial support from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF project 21440 to H.W‐S.) is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Dr Jiri Macas (CAS; Czech Republic) for the plastid DNA probe.

References

  1. Ainsworth CC. 1981. The population cytology of Scilla autumnalis. PhD thesis, University of London, London, UK. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ainsworth CC, Parker JS, Horton DM. 1983. Chromosome variation and evolution in Scilla autumnalis In: Brandham PE, Bennett MD, eds. Kew chromosome conference II. London, UK: George Allen & Unwin, 261–268. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ali SS, Yu Y, Pfosser M, Wetschnig W. 2011. Inferences of biogeographical histories within subfamily Hyacinthoideae using S‐DIVA and Bayesian binary MCMC analysis implemented in RASP (Reconstruct Ancestral State in Phylogenies). Annals of Botany 109: 95–107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Banaei‐Moghaddam AM, Schubert V, Kumke K, Weiß O, Klemme S, Nagaki K, Macas J, González‐Sánchez M, Heredia V, Gómez‐Revilla D et al 2012. Nondisjunction in favor of a chromosome: the mechanism of rye B chromosome drive during pollen mitosis. Plant Cell 24: 4124–4134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bougourd SM, Parker JS. 1979. The B‐chromosome system of Allium schoenoprasum. II. Stability, inheritance and phenotypic effects. Chromosoma 75: 369–383. [Google Scholar]
  6. Camacho JPM, Sharbel T, Beukeboom L. 2000. B‐chromosome evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 355: 163–178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carchilan M, Kumke K, Mikolajewski S, Houben A. 2009. Rye B chromosomes are weakly transcribed and might alter the transcriptional activity of A chromosome sequences. Chromosoma 118: 607–616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cohen S, Agmon N, Sobol O, Segal D. 2010. Extrachromosomal chromosomal circles of satellite repeats and 5S ribosomal DNA in human cells. Mobile DNA 1: 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohen S, Houben A, Segal D. 2008. Extrachromosomal circular DNA derived from tandemly repeated genomic sequences in plants. Plant Journal 53: 1027–1034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dhar MK, Friebe B, Koul AK, Gill BS. 2002. Origin of an apparent B chromosome by mutation, chromosome fragmentation and specific DNA sequence amplification. Chromosoma 111: 332–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ebert I. 1993. Systematische Karyologie und Embryologie von Prospero Salisb. und Barnardia Lindl. (Hyacinthaceae). PhD thesis, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ebert I, Greilhuber J, Speta F. 1996. Chromosome banding and genome size differentiation in Prospero (Hyacinthaceae): diploids. Plant Systematics and Evolution 203: 143–177. [Google Scholar]
  13. Emadzade K, Jang T‐S, Macas J, Kovařík A, Novák P, Parker J, Weiss‐Schneeweiss H. 2014. Differential amplification of satellite PaB6 in chromosomally hypervariable Prospero autumnale complex (Hyacinthaceae). Annals of Botany 114: 1597–1608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Garrido‐Ramos MA, Jamilena M, de la Herrán R, Ruiz Rejón C, Camacho JPM, Ruiz‐Rejón M. 1998. Inheritance and fitness effects of a pericentric inversion and a supernumerary chromosome segment in Muscari comosum (Liliaceae). Heredity 80: 724–731. [Google Scholar]
  15. Greilhuber J, Speta F. 1978. Quantitative analysis of the C‐banded karyotypes and systematic in the cultivated species of the Scilla siberica group (Liliaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 129: 63–109. [Google Scholar]
  16. Guillén A, Ruiz Rejón M. 1984. Structural variability and chromosome numbers variation in natural populations of Scilla autumnalis (Liliaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 144: 201–207. [Google Scholar]
  17. Holmes DS, Bougourd SM. 1989. B‐chromosome selection in Allium schoenoprasum. V. Natural populations. Heredity 63: 83–87. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hong DY. 1982. Cytotype variation and polyploidy in Scilla autumnalis L. (Liliaceae). Hereditas 97: 227–235. [Google Scholar]
  19. Houben A, Banaei‐Moghaddam AM, Klemme S. 2013. Biology and evolution of B chromosomes In: Leitch IJ, Greilhuber J, Doležel J, Wendel JF, eds. Plant genome diversity, vol 2, physical structure, behavior and evolution of plant genomes. Vienna, Austria: Springer, 149–165. [Google Scholar]
  20. Houben A, Leach CR, Verlin DV, Rofe R, Timmis J. 1997. A repetitive DNA sequence common to the different B chromosomes of the genus Brachycome . Chromosoma 106: 513–519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jamilena M, Martínez F, Garrido‐Ramos MA, Ruiz‐Rejón C, Romero AT, Camacho JPM, Parker JS, Ruiz‐Rejón M. 1995. Inheritance and fitness effects analysis for a euchromatic supernumerary chromosome segment in Scilla autumnalis (Liliaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 118: 249–259. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jang T‐S. 2013. Chromosomal evolution in Prospero autumnale complex. PhD thesis, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jang T‐S, Emadzade K, Parker J, Temsch EM, Leitch AR, Speta F, Weiss‐Schneeweiss H. 2013. Chromosomal diversification and karyotype evolution of diploids in the cytologically diverse genus Prospero (Hyacinthaceae). BMC Evolutionary Biology 13: 136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jang T‐S, Weiss‐Schneeweiss H. 2015. Formamide‐free genomic in situ hybridization (ff‐GISH) allows unambiguous discrimination of highly similar parental genomes in diploid hybrids and allopolyploids. Cytogenetic and Genome Research. doi: 10.1159/000441210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jones RN. 1995. B chromosomes in plants. New Phytologist 131: 411–434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jones RN, Houben A. 2003. B chromosomes in plants: escapees from the A chromosome genome? Trends in Plant Science 8: 417–423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jones RN, Rees H. 1982. B chromosomes. London, UK: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jones RN, Viegas W, Houben A. 2008. A century of B chromosomes in plants: so what? Annals of Botany 101: 767–775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Klemme S, Banaei‐Moghaddam AM, Macas J, Wicker T, Novák P, Houben A. 2013. High‐copy sequences reveal distinct evolution of the rye B chromosome. New Phytologist 199: 550–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kubaláková M, Valárik M, Bartoš J, Vrána J, Cíhalíková J, Molnár‐Láng M, Doležel J. 2003. Analysis and sorting of rye (Secale cereale L.) chromosomes using flow cytometry. Genome 46: 893–905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Langdon T, Seago C, Jones RN, Ougham H, Thomas H, Forster JW, Jenkins G. 2000. De novo evolution of satellite DNA on the rye B chromosome. Genetics 154: 869–884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Levin DA, Palestis BG, Jones RN, Trivers R. 2005. Phyletic hot spots for B chromosomes in angiosperms. Evolution 59: 962–969. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lopez‐Leon MD, Cabrero J, Pardo MC, Viseras E, Camacho JPM, Santos JL. 1993. Generating high variability of B chromosomes in Eyprepocnemis plorans (grasshopper). Heredity 71: 352–362. [Google Scholar]
  34. Małuszyńska J, Schweizer D. 1989. Ribosomal RNA genes in B chromosomes of Crepis capillaris detected by non‐radioactive in situ hybridization. Heredity 62: 59–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Marques A, Banaei‐Moghaddam AM, Klemme S, Blattner FR, Niwa K, Guerra M, Houben A. 2013. B chromosomes of rye are highly conserved and accompanied the development of early agriculture. Annals of Botany 112: 527–534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Marques A, Klemme S, Guerra M, Houben A. 2012. Cytomolecular characterization of de novo formed rye B chromosome variants. Molecular Cytogenetics 5: 34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Marschner S, Kumke K, Houben A. 2007. B chromosomes of B. dichromosomatica show a reduced level of euchromatic histone H3 methylation marks. Chromosome Research 15: 215–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Martis MM, Klemme S, Banaei‐Moghaddam AM, Blattner FR, Macas J, Schmutzer T, Scholz U, Gundlach H, Wicker T, Šimková H et al 2012. Selfish supernumerary chromosome reveals its origin as a mosaic of host genome and organellar sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109: 13343–13346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Navrátilová A, Koblizkova A, Macas J. 2008. Survey of extrachromosomal circular DNA derived from plant satellite repeats. BMC Plant Biology 8: 90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Parker JS, Lozano R, Taylor S, Ruiz Rejòn M. 1991. Chromosomal structure of populations of Scilla autumnalis in the Iberian Peninsula. Heredity 67: 287–297. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ruban A, Fuchs J, Marques A, Schubert V, Soloviev A, Raskina O, Badaeva E, Houben A. 2014. B chromosomes of Aegilops speltoides are enriched in organelle genome‐derived sequences. PLoS ONE 9: e90214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ruiz Rejón M, Oliver JL. 1981. Genetic variability in Muscari comosum (Liliaceae). I. A comparative analysis of chromosome polymorphisms in Spanish and Aegean populations. Heredity 47: 403–407. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ruiz Rejón M, Posse F, Oliver JL. 1980. The B chromosome system of Scilla autumnalis (Liliaceae): effects at the isozyme level. Chromosoma 79: 341–348. [Google Scholar]
  44. Sharbel TF, Mitchell‐Olds T, Dobeš C, Kantama L, de Jong H. 2005. Biogeographic distribution of polyploidy and B chromosomes in the apomictic Boechera holboellii complex. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 109: 283–292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Speta F. 1993. The autumn‐flowering squills of the Mediterranean Region. Proceedings of 5th Optima Meeting, Istanbul, Turkey, 109–124.
  46. Speta F. 2000. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Gattung Prospero Salisb (Hyacinthaceae) auf der griechischen Insel Kreta. Linzer Biologische Beitraege 32: 1323–1326. [Google Scholar]
  47. Taylor S. 1997. Chromosomal evolution of Scilla autumnalis. PhD thesis, University of London, London, UK. [Google Scholar]
  48. Trivers R, Burt A, Palestis BG. 2004. B chromosomes and genome size in flowering plants. Genome 47: 1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Valente GT, Conte MA, Fantinatti BEA, Cabral‐de‐Mello DC, Carvalho RF, Vicari MR, Kocher TD, Martins C. 2014. Origin and evolution of B chromosomes in the cichlid fish Astatotilapia latifasciata based on integrated genomic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 31: 2061–2072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Vaughan HE, Taylor S, Parker JS. 1997. The ten cytological races of the Scilla autumnalis species complex. Heredity 79: 371–379. [Google Scholar]
  51. Weiss‐Schneeweiss H, Emadzade K, Jang T‐S, Schneeweiss GM. 2013. Evolutionary consequences, constraints and potential of polyploidy in plants. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 140: 137–150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Weiss‐Schneeweiss H, Schneeweiss GM. 2013. Karyotype diversity and evolutionary trends in angiosperms In: Leitch IJ, Greilhuber J, Doležel J, Wendel JF, eds. Plant genome diversity, vol. 2, physical structure, behavior and evolution of plant genomes. Vienna, Austria: Springer Verlag, 209–230. [Google Scholar]
  53. Weiss‐Schneeweiss H, Riha K, Jang CG, Puizina J, Scherthan H, Schweizer D. 2004. Chromosome termini of the monocot plant Othocallis siberica are maintained by telomerase, which specifically synthesizes vertebrate‐type telomere sequences. Plant Journal 37: 484–493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Please note: Wiley Blackwell are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the New Phytologist Central Office.

Fig. S1 Structure of B chromosomes in 24 of 26 analysed individuals of Prospero autumnale.

Fig. S2 Localization of plastid DNA sequences and satellite DNA PaB6 loci in B chromosomes of the Prospero autumnale complex.

Click here for additional data file. (562.4KB, pdf)

Articles from The New Phytologist are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES