Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1992 Nov;45(11):968–974. doi: 10.1136/jcp.45.11.968

Parasitology: United Kingdom National Quality Assessment Scheme.

M Hawthorne 1, P L Chiodini 1, J J Snell 1, A H Moody 1, A Ramsay 1
PMCID: PMC495026  PMID: 1452791

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the results from parasitology laboratories taking part in a quality assessment scheme between 1986 and 1991; and to compare performance with repeat specimens. METHODS: Quality assessment of blood parasitology, including tissue parasites (n = 444; 358 UK, 86 overseas), and faecal parasitology, including extra-intestinal parasites (n = 205; 141 UK, 64 overseas), was performed. RESULTS: Overall, the standard of performance was poor. A questionnaire distributed to participants showed that a wide range of methods was used, some of which were considered inadequate to achieve reliable results. Teaching material was distributed to participants from time to time in an attempt to improve standards. CONCLUSIONS: Since the closure of the IMLS fellowship course in 1972, fewer opportunities for specialised training in parasitology are available: more training is needed. Poor performance in the detection of malarial parasites is mainly attributable to incorrect speciation, misidentification, and lack of equipment such as an eyepiece graticule.

Full text

PDF
968

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen A. V., Ridley D. S. Further observations on the formol-ether concentration technique for faecal parasites. J Clin Pathol. 1970 Sep;23(6):545–546. doi: 10.1136/jcp.23.6.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Diamond L. S., Harlow D. R., Cunnick C. C. A new medium for the axenic cultivation of Entamoeba histolytica and other Entamoeba. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1978;72(4):431–432. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(78)90144-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Snell J. J., De Mello J. V., Gardner P. S. The United Kingdom national microbiological quality assessment scheme. J Clin Pathol. 1982 Jan;35(1):82–93. doi: 10.1136/jcp.35.1.82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Snell J. J., De Mello J. V., Phua T. J. Errors in bacteriological techniques: results from the United Kingdom national external quality assessment scheme for microbiology. Med Lab Sci. 1986 Oct;43(4):344–355. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Snell J. J. United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Scheme for Microbiology. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Oct;4(5):464–467. doi: 10.1007/BF02014425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES