Skip to main content
Oncology Letters logoLink to Oncology Letters
. 2016 Jun 16;12(2):1023–1026. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.4736

Solitary subdural osteoma: A case report and literature review

Lei Cao 1, Lichuan Hong 2, Chuzhong Li 2, Yazhuo Zhang 2, Songbai Gui 1,
PMCID: PMC4950471  PMID: 27446388

Abstract

Osteomas attached to the meninges unrelated to bone are extremely rare and their etiology has not been discussed previously in the English literature. Here, we report the case of a 54-year-old male patient with a right frontal subdural osteoma. The patient presented with a ~5-month history of intermittent dizziness. Non-contrasted computerized tomography demonstrated a densely calcified mass attached to the inner surface of the right frontal skull. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed this mass could be enhanced by contrast MRI. Intraoperatively, the hard mass was noted to be attached to the inner layer of the dura mater, and not associated with the bone. Histopathological examination revealed lamellated bony trabeculae lined by osteoblasts and the intertrabecular marrow spaces occupied by adipose tissue, which contributed to the MRI enhancement. It was speculated that subdural osteomas arose from ectopic osteoblasts derived from the embryological neural crest cells. The context of intertrabecular bone marrow contributed to the enhancement on MRI. Simple excision is the treatment of choice for symptomatic lesions.

Keywords: subdural osteoma, dura mater, neural crest cell, oncology

Introduction

Osteomas are benign neoplasms characterized by the proliferation of compact, lamellar, mature, normal osseous tissue. The disease presents as an exophytic mass usually arising from the paranasal sinuses, facial bones, skull or mandible. Subsural osteomas attached to the meninges unrelated to bone are extremely rare (19). They are most likely located in the frontal region, according to the literature (19). The initiating factor that triggers the formation of subdural osteoma remains unclear; however, Choudhury et al (2), Aoki et al (3) and Sugimoto et al (4) have reported that head trauma may trigger the activation of dural ectopic osteoblasts. Symptomatic subdural osteomas may present as pressure symptoms or epilepsy, and simple excision is the treatment of choice for symptomatic lesions. In this case report, we discuss the radiological and clinicopathological findings of a subdural osteoma in a 54-year-old male, and speculate on its etiological mechanism.

Case report

A 54-year-old male presented at Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University (Beijing, China) in June 2014, with a 5-month history of intermittent dizziness. He had a history of right zygomatic fracture 10 years prior without brain injury. Physical examination revealed no neurological abnormality. A non-contrast computerized tomography (CT) scan demonstrated a densely calcified mass beneath the right parietal bone, which exhibited a mild mass effect upon the right frontal lobe. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed that the mass was iso- and hyperintense on T1-weighted imaging and iso- and hypointense on T2-weighted imaging. The mass and the attached dura mater could be enhanced by gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Fig. 1). The tumor was misdiagnosed as calcified meningioma preoperatively, and a right frontal craniotomy was performed to remove it. The dura mater was observed to be intact intra-operatively, while the calcified mass attached to the inner layer of the meninges exhibited no association with the overlying cranial bone. The lesion was noted to be firm and it could be easily removed from the arachnoid membrane, so it was extracted en bloc without cortical injury. Pathological examination revealed lamellated bony trabeculae lined with osteoblasts, and the intertrabecular marrow spaces were occupied by adipose tissue having no active osteoblastic or osteoclastic activity (Fig. 2). The patient recovered uneventfully and was discharged without neurological deficits. The tumor did not recur during the 6-month follow-up period and the dizziness subsided.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Appearance of the lesion on CT and MRI. (A) CT revealed a densely calcified mass attached to the inner surface of the right frontal skull. (B1-5) The mass was enhanced by (B1 and 2) non-contrast and (B3-5) contrast MRI. CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Histopathology of the resected specimen by hematoxylin and eosin staining. Lamellated bony trabeculae and the intertrabecular spaces are occupied by loose fibrovascular tissue (magnification A, ×40; B, ×200)

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient prior to the publication of the present study.

Discussion

Subdural osteoma is recognized as a rare variant of intracranial osteoma and has an unclear etiology. A reactive mechanism may have been triggered by trauma in the present case, as certain authors have suggested previously (24). In the head, the most common anatomic sites are the frontal sinus, the ethmoidal sinuses and the mandible. However, subdural osteomas arising from the inner layer of the dura mater with no association with the covered bone are rarer. We reviewed the literature and noted that almost all previous cases of subdural osteomas were attached to the frontal dura or falx (Table I). It was located far more commonly on the right side than the left side (8:1 ratio). Fallon et al (9) also observed that intracranial meningeal osteomas were usually located at the convexity dura and falx junction around the superior sagittal sinus. The periosteum of the frontal bones and cells from the nasal septum, which are of neural crest origin, contribute to the falx cerebri and the adjacent dura (10). All of these predilection sites, including the frontal and ethmoidal sinuses and the mandible, are derived from the embryological neural crest cells. We speculated that the new bones arise from ectopic osteoblasts; this hypothesis requires further study.

Table I.

Cases of solitary subdural osteomas attached to dura mater without association with bone in the literature.

Case/author/year/ref. Age/gender Location Symptoms MRI Treatment Surgical findings Pathological findings Outcome
1. Dukes et al, 1965 (1) 60/M Right frontal convexity Headache Not available Right frontal craniotomy Attached to dura mater Not available No postoperative problems
2. Choudhury et al, 1995 (2) 20/F Right frontal convexity Headache Enhanced Right fronto-temporal craniotomy Attached to dura mater Contains bone marrow Improved
3. Aoki et al, 1998 (3) 51/F Right frontal convexity Headache Enhanced Right frontal craniotomy Partially attached to dura mater Contains bone marrow No postoperative problems
4. Sugimoto et al, 2001 (4) 35/M Right frontal convexity Vertigo Non-enhanced Right frontal craniotomy Attached to dura mater Not available Not available
5. Cheon et al, 2002 (5) 43/F Left frontal convexity Headache Not available Left frontal craniotomy Attached to dura mater No bone marrow Asymptomatic
6. Jung et al, 2007 (6) 60/M Right frontal convexity Headache Not available Right frontal craniotomy Attached to dura mater Contains bone marrow Improved
7. Barajas et al, 2012 (7) 63/F Right temporal convexity Progressively altered mental status Non-enhanced Right fronto-temperoal craniotomy Attached to dura mater No bone marrow Improved
8. Chen et al, 2013 (8) 64/M Right mesial frontal lobe extra-axially Tinnitus with dizziness Not available Right frontal craniotomy Attached to falx Contains bone marrow Improved
9. Present case 54/M Right frontal convexity Dizziness Enhanced Right frontal craniotomy Attached to dura mater Contains bone marrow Improved

MRI, magnitic resonance imaging.

This tumor type is mosts commonly associated with the symptoms of headache or dizziness, which may be due to the pressure on the underlying cerebral tissue. All patients in the cases studied presented with headache or dizziness, except one, who had a progressive, altered mental state (Table I).

On MRI, the appearance of the subdural osteomas was consistent with that of tumors. Table I reveals that three of the five subdural osteomas (cases 2, 3 and 9), containing intertrabecular bone marrow, were enhanced by contrast on MRI, while the enhanced MRI examination was not available for the other two cases (cases 6 and 8). Case 7, containing no bone marrow, was not enhanced. Therefore, the context of intertrabecular bone marrow contributed to the enhancement on MRI. Calcified meningioma often destroys surrounding bone as a consequence of extracranial extension (7), although it may also be enhanced on MRI. Subdural osteomas should be differentially diagnosed from meningeal ossifications, which are commonly multicentric and located on the dural-falx junction along both sides of the superior sagittal sinus (9).

Simple excision is the treatment of choice for symptomatic lesions. These seldom recur following excision and they are not associated with malignant change.

References

  • 1.Dukes HT, Odom GL. Discrete intradural osteoma. Report of a case. J Neurosurg. 1962;19:251–253. doi: 10.3171/jns.1962.19.3.0251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Choudhury AR, Haleem A, Tjan GT. Solitary intradural intracranial osteoma. Br J Neurosurg. 1995;9:557–559. doi: 10.1080/02688699550041232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Aoki H, Nakase H, Sakaki T. Subdural osteoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1998;140:727–728. doi: 10.1007/s007010050171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sugimoto K, Nakahara I, Nishikawa M, Tanaka M, Terashima T, Yanagihara H, Hayashi J. Osteoma originating in the dura: a case report. No Shinkei Geka. 2001;29:993–996. (In Japanese) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cheon JE, Kim JE, Yang HJ. CT and pathologic findings of a case of subdural osteoma. Korean J Radiol. 2002;3:211–213. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2002.3.3.211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jung TY, Jung S, Jin SG, Jin YH, Kim IY, Kang SS. Solitary intracranial subdural osteoma: intraoperative findings and primary anastomosis of an involved cortical vein. J Clin Neurosci. 2007;14:468–470. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2005.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Barajas RF, Jr, Perry A, Sughrue M, Aghi M, Cha S. Intracranial subdural osteoma: a rare benign tumor that can be differentiated from other calcified intracranial lesions utilizing MR imaging. J Neuroradiol. 2012;39:263–266. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2011.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chen SM, Chuang CC, Toh CH, Jung SM, Lui TN. Solitary intracranial osteoma with attachment to the falx: a case report. World J Surg Oncol. 2013;11:221. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fallon MD, Ellerbrake D, Teitelbaum SL. Meningeal osteomas and chronic renal failure. Hum Pathol. 1982;13:449–453. doi: 10.1016/S0046-8177(82)80027-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.O'Rahilly R, Müller F. The meninges in human development. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1986;45:588–608. doi: 10.1097/00005072-198609000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Oncology Letters are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES