Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1992 Sep;45(9):815–818. doi: 10.1136/jcp.45.9.815

Comparison of Sentinel and Bactec blood culture systems.

M Stevens 1, H Patel 1, A Walters 1, K Burch 1, A Jay 1, N Dowling 1, C J Mitchell 1, R A Swann 1, A T Willis 1, D C Shanson 1, et al.
PMCID: PMC495112  PMID: 1401215

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the Sentinel automated blood culture system and to compare its performance with that of Bactec. METHODS: The Sentinel blood culture system was evaluated in three centres. The performance of the system was assessed in comparison with the routine blood culture method used in these centres, the Bactec system. RESULTS: Blood culture sets (n = 2180) consisting of Sentinel aerobic and anaerobic, and Bactec aerobic and anaerobic bottles yielded 218 (10%) clinically important isolates. One hundred and fifty five (71%) of the isolates were detected by both systems; 35 (16%) were detected by Sentinel only; and 28 (13%) by Bactec only. For the duration of the evaluation, the Sentinel system was deliberately configured so that it was impossible to detect positive results during the first 12 hours. The times to positivity after the first 12 hours were similar. Data gathered during and subsequent to the evaluation have been used by the manufacturer to refine the algorithm so that positive results can be detected at a minimum of 2.25 hours. CONCLUSIONS: After a period of familiarization the Sentinel system was considered easy to use. Sentinel is a useful addition to the methods available for the detection of bacteria in blood cultures.

Full text

PDF
815

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Corkill J. E., Rimmer K. Microbiological comparison of a new infra-red blood culture system (Bactec NR 600) and a radiometric system (Bactec 460). Med Lab Sci. 1987 Apr;44(2):150–159. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jungkind D., Millan J., Allen S., Dyke J., Hill E. Clinical comparison of a new automated infrared blood culture system with the BACTEC 460 system. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):262–266. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.2.262-266.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Shanson D. C. Blood culture technique: current controversies. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990 Apr;25 (Suppl 100):17–29. doi: 10.1093/jac/25.suppl_c.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Tenney J. H., Reller L. B., Mirrett S., Wang W. L., Weinstein M. P. Controlled evaluation of the volume of blood cultured in detection of bacteremia and fungemia. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Apr;15(4):558–561. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.4.558-561.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES