Skip to main content
Journal of Food Science and Technology logoLink to Journal of Food Science and Technology
. 2016 Jun 21;53(6):2606–2613. doi: 10.1007/s13197-016-2227-7

Effects of plasticizers on sorption and optical properties of gum cordia based edible film

Muhammad Abdul Haq 1,, Feroz Alam Jafri 1, Abid Hasnain 1
PMCID: PMC4951413  PMID: 27478216

Abstract

The present study aimed to characterize a biodegradable film produced from the polysaccharide of an indigenous plant Cordia myxa. Effect of plasticizer type (Glycerol, Sorbitol, PEG200 and PEG 400) and concentration (0–30 %) was studied on sorption and optical properties of the casted film. Increase in plasticizer concentration resulted in increase in equilibrium moisture content of the film and was supported by GAB model of sorption indicating that isotherms were of Type II. The monolayer value increased with the increase in plasticizer concentration with a peak of 0.93 g.g-1 for glycerol. Addition of plasticizers improved the total color (ΔE) with glycerol showing the highest effects. All films showed resistance to UV light in the range of 280–200 nm. The polysaccharide of the fruit of C.myxa can be used to prepare an edible film with improved properties as compared to other available edible coatings.

Keywords: Gum cordia, Edible film, Sorption isotherm, Optical properties

Introduction

Plant foods for human consumption normally undergo series of post-harvest processes, transportation and storage before it reaches consumers. Hence, these processes many have significant impact on the sensory attributes such as appearance, texture and nutritional quality of processed foods (Ruiz-Navajas et al. 2015). Preservation of such foods is made through widely used methods such as storing them in low temperature; reducing water activity, drying, preserving by chemical means and controlled packaging to minimize the mass transfer such as oxygen, aroma, moisture to the environment. Among these methods; packaging plays an important role. The packaging of foods also improves the aesthetic appeal by providing information about food and convenience in handling.

Edible films normally behave like a barrier against the transportation of water across the film (Weng and Wu 2015). However, if edible film is hydrophilic then it means that moisture could be drawn either from the outside environment or from the product inside the package, causing significant characteristic changes (Chinma and Ariahu 2015). A sorption isotherm is used to study the potential of the film to adsorb moisture from environment as a function of water activity (aw) and can be measured in drying (desorption) or adsorption (hydration) experiment. In general, empirical sorption and desorption data is used to develop a mathematical relationship between the equilibrium moisture content and water activity (Coupland et al. 2000). Widely used equations are Bruanuer-Emmet-Teller (BET) and Guggenheim-Anderson-de Boer (GAB). BET model is limited to 0–0.5 aw and comprises two constants; the monolayer moisture content (Xo) and net heat of sorption (C). GAB model is very close to BET model with a difference of a wider range of water activity (0.05–0.9 aw) making it a choice for studying food systems (Timmermann et al. 2001). Along with the two constants of BET model, GAB model contains one more constant k representing the difference between properties of multilayer molecules and surrounding liquid. The sorption isotherms of various materials are classified into five different types on the basis of the Van der Waals adsorption of gases (Blahovec and Yanniotis 2009) namely Langmuir and Sigmoid for the first two types while the other three are unnamed. Most food materials exhibit sigmoidal isotherm (Blahovec and Yanniotis 2009).

Edible films are fabricated using biopolymers which usually form brittle films due to strong interactions between polymer chains through hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding, electrostatic forces and cross linking. Some small molecular weight compounds, known as plasticizers, reduce these interactions which result in soft and flexible film (Laohakunjit and Noomhorm 2004). The ability of a molecule to act as plasticizer depends on its molecular configuration, no of free hydroxyl groups and the configuration of the biopolymer i.e. compatibility of the plasticizer with polymer. These small molecules can significantly alter the mechanical and permeation properties of the edible film (Haq et al. 2014a). Moisture in edible films also behaves like a plasticizer affecting their physical and barrier properties (Debeaufort and Voilley 1997; Gennadios et al. 1993). Plasticizers e.g. glycerol, sorbitol and polyethylene glycol are hydrophilic and attract water in to the polymer matrix thus further enhance the plasticization activity (Zhang and Han 2006). Due to the importance of humidity dependant equilibrium moisture content, a number of sorption isotherms for edible films have been reported (Bertuzzi et al. 2007; Debeaufort and Voilley 1997; Gontard et al. 1993; Kang et al. 2015). For example, in potato peel based edible film, moisture content, water diffusivity and water vapor permeability (WVP) values were found to be higher in films with 50 % glycerol (Kang et al. 2015). Similarly, Bertuzzi et al. 2007 showed that glycerol increases the moisture and WVP of the starch films. Gontard et al. 1993 observed humidity depended puncture strength of gluten film in the presence of glycerol. Debeaufort and Voilley 1997 reported that polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG400) increases the susceptibility of the methylcellulose based edible films towards humidity dependant mechanical properties.

Edible films interact with electromagnetic spectrum in visible and ultraviolet (UV) regions. This is reflected in two important optical properties, color and transparency. The transmittance of visible light through the film to reveal the products color is a characteristic feature consumer appreciates (Yang and Paulson 2000). One the other hand, the transmittance of ultra violet light is detrimental to food product (Akhtar et al. 2012).

The major bulk of edible film is made up of proteins from animal source such as collagen, gelatin, fish myofibril, milk such as casein, whey, egg such as egg white or protein from plant source such as corn zein, wheat gluten, soy and peanut protein (Azam et al. 2013; Bhat and Karim 2014; Guldas et al. 2010; Lim et al. 1999; Tao et al. 2015). Other bulking agents include carbohydrates or lipids. However, these materials have limited utilization due to the high cost associated and limitation in functionality (Vieira et al. 2011). Current approach includes exploring new biological materials to develop edible films of superior quality and low manufacturing cost. Our previous work explored a new plant specie Cordia myxa, a tree of plant family Boreginaceae, which grows nearly all over the Indo-Pak subcontinent but has limited medicinal uses (Haq and Azam 2015). The ripe fruits contain thick sticky material mostly anionic polysaccharides suggesting its use as biodegradable films and coatings (Haq et al. 2013; Haq et al. 2014a). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of plasticizer in biodegradable films prepared from the anionic polysaccharide extracted from C.myxa for the improvement of sorption isotherm and optical properties.

Material and methods

Film fabrication

Gum was extracted and purified from the fruits of C.myxa by hot water and acid precipitation (Haq et al. 2014b). Films were prepared by solution casting method as previously described by our group (Haq et al. 2014a). Briefly, gum (10 g) was added to about 800 ml water, 0.1 N NaOH was then slowly added with mixing till the pH was achieved to 7.0. The solution was then made up to 1 L. Then the plasticizers (glycerol, sorbitol, polyethylene glycol 200 or polyethylene glycol 400) were added in to gum solution at the rate of 0–30 % based on the weight of the gum by mixing. The solutions were poured into clean and smooth glass petri dishes and dried at 40 °C and 10 % RH for 48 h in a controlled environmental chamber (Lab Tech Model LCT 1075C, Korea). The samples were conditioned to 58 % RH for 72 h before measurements taken unless otherwise specified.

Sorption properties

The effect of environmental humidity on equilibrium moisture content (sorption isotherm) was determined by gravimetric method. Films were cut in squares (20 × 20 mm) and dried at 90 °C for 72 h before placing them into desiccators under controlled humidity (Table 1). The humidity was adjusted by placing a slush of various salts in desiccator at 25 ± 0.2 °C (Greenspan 1977). The films were exposed to the environment created by slush having aw of 0.11 to 0.90 for three days, sufficient to saturate the films with environment as determined by reweighing the film on 5th and 6th day with no change in weight. The films were weighed in an analytical balance with a least count of 0.01 mg. The mathematical model, Guggenheim- Anderson-de Boer (GAB), was applied to experimental data.

Table 1.

Saturated salt solutions used to control the water activity

S.N Chemical Name Chemical Formula a w at 25 °C
1. Lithium Chloride LiCl 0.112
2. Magnesium Chloride MgCl2 0.328
3. Potassium Carbonate K2CO3 0.432
4. Magnesium Nitrate Mg(NO3)2 0.529
5. Sodium Bromide NaBr 0.576
6. Sodium Nitrate NaNO3 0.709
7. Sodium Chloride NaCl 0.753
8. Barium Chloride BaCl2 0.902

This model is described by the following equation;

X=CkXoaw1kaw1kaw+Ckaw 1

Where:

X is the equilibrium moisture content on dry basis (g g−1).

aw is the water activity.

Xo is the monolayer moisture content i.e. the water required to saturate all primary adsorption sites by single water molecule.

C is the Guggenheim constant and represents the energy difference between the water molecules attached to primary sorption sites and those adsorbed to successive sorption layers and.

k is a correction factor which represents the difference between the properties of multilayer molecules with respect to the bulk liquid.

Optical properties

Color of the films was analyzed by spectrophotometer (Model, V-670, JASCO, Tokyo, Japan) with 2° standard observer and D65 light source against a white background plate having L*a*b* value 97.39, 0.03 and 1.42 respectively. Total color difference between the white background and film samples was calculated using the following equation

ΔE=ΔL*2+Δa*2+Δb*2 2

Where; ∆L*; ∆a* and ∆b* are the differentials between the color parameter of the film samples and the color parameter of the white standard plate.

For the assessment of the UV and visible light barrier properties, the film samples were mounted on a film holder and scanned for transmittance (200–800 nm). Transparency of the film was calculated by following equation;

Transperancy=A600Thickness 3

Experimental design and statistical analysis

Full factorial experimental design with randomized order using single factor at 21 levels (4 plasticizer in 5 concentration = 20 plus one without plasticizer) was used. Each experiment was performed in triplicate. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan multiple range test was used to distinguish the treatments at p < 0.05 using statistical package for social scientists (SPSS version 17). For sorption parameters, data (water activity and moisture content) was fitted on GAB model using non linear regression analysis option of SPSS.

Results and discussions

Sorption isotherm

The representative moisture sorption isotherms of gum cordia films containing different plasticizers at a level of 10 % are presented in Fig.1. For all films equilibrium moisture content was increased slowly till about 0.7 aw followed by rapid increase. All isotherms curve are sigmoidal in shape as described for most food commodities (Blahovec and Yanniotis 2009) and food polymers (Gontard et al. 1993). The order of sensitivity of the films for aw was found in the order of Glycerol > Sorbitol > PEG 200 > PEG 400 > Control.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Representative sorption isotherm of gum cordia film, the concentration of all plasticizers is 10 % based on gum cordia weight

Effect of concentration of plasticizer on equilibrium moisture content is given in Fig.2. For all plasticizers, approximately linear increase in equilibrium moisture content was observed with respect to concentration except at very low aw (0.11). At this aw, the equilibrium moisture content was found decreasing with increase in concentration of plasticizer. This phenomenon is observed because of hydroxyl groups in plasticizer, saturating the adsorption sites of polymer under low humidity conditions (Debeaufort and Voilley 1997), but subsequently replaced by water at elevated humidity (Baik and Chinachoti 2001). This is also consistent with our finding where among all plasticizers, glycerol showed sharp changes at lower humid conditions due to highest number of hydroxyl groups per unit mass. The moisture adsorption was further increased due to increase in free volume of polymer allowing the matrix to adsorb more water and promoting water clustering at successively higher hydration levels.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

a Effects of plasticizer type and concentration on equilibrium moisture content of gum Cordia films at different water activities a. 0.11 aw, b. 0.33 aw, c. 0.43 aw d. 0.53 aw. (2b) Effects of plasticizer type and concentration on equilibrium moisture content of gum Cordia films at different water activities e. 0.58 aw, f. 0.70 aw, g. 0.75 aw h. 0.90 aw

The compatibility of the plasticizer and its hydrophilic nature made it helpful to determine the equilibrium moisture content of the film in a wide range of aw. The sorption of water is related to hydroxyl groups on the molecule and its molecular weight. At lower aw (0.11) and low plasticizer concentration, the sorbitol plasticized film showed highest water sorption while glycerol plasticized film showed highest sorption at higher aw. Glycerol being smaller in size penetrated better into the polymer increasing available – OH to interact with water (Donhowe and Fennema 1993). In comparison to sorbitol, glycerol containing more hydroxyl groups per unit mass exhibited highest equilibrium moisture content. This is also in agreement with PEG 400 having lowest hydroxyl groups per unit mass showed minimum water sorption.

The GAB equation was found to fit well on experimental data (Table 2). The coefficient of multiple determination (R2) was found to be greater than 0.98. Similarly the GAB equation parameter, k was found to be <1 and C > 2, indicating that isotherms were of Type II (Blahovec and Yanniotis 2009). The monolayer value varied with type and concentration of plasticizer. The monolayer value increased by increasing plasticizer concentration. The highest monolayer value was found at be 0.93 g.g−1 in glycerol plasticized film. The C parameter decreased with increase in plasticizer content and was found lowest for glycerol. This parameter represents the energy difference between the water molecules attached to primary sorption sites and those adsorbed to successive sorption. The parameter k, of GAB model was found independent of the type and concentration of plasticizer. These results are in agreement with previously reported values for biopolymers (Mali et al. 2005).

Table 2.

Effect of plasticizer type and concentration on GAB equation parameters of gum cordia film

Plasticizer Concentration (%) Xo C K R2
None None 0.039 120.677 0.799 0.985
Glycerol 10 0.069 6.935 0.958 0.996
15 0.071 6.090 0.957 0.974
20 0.075 5.152 0.967 0.991
25 0.085 4.952 0.953 0.985
30 0.093 4.057 0.951 0.975
Sorbitol 10 0.047 20.676 0.965 0.967
15 0.049 18.577 0.942 0.977
20 0.051 15.564 0.965 0.986
25 0.052 12.566 0.975 0.992
30 0.054 10.647 0.967 0.995
PEG 200 10 0.044 18.546 0.946 0.996
15 0.045 17.565 0.965 0.967
20 0.048 16.465 0.986 0.997
25 0.049 15.453 0.976 0.995
30 0.053 12.356 0.946 0.996
PEG 400 10 0.039 20.556 0.965 0.985
15 0.040 20.556 0.986 0.983
20 0.041 18.564 0.946 0.997
25 0.045 17.564 0.975 0.995
30 0.049 15.564 0.996 0.992

Optical properties

The gum cordia film was transparent and yellowish in color. The yellowish nature of the film is represented by b* parameter of CIE color space and measured in the range 9–20 depending upon the type and concentration of plasticizer (Table 3). This parameter also contributed largest in total color difference (∆E), which was found at 17–28. The addition of plasticizer decreased ∆E. This effect was most pronounced in films plasticized with glycerol. The incorporation of colorless plasticizers in film matrix resulted in the dilution of the colored film forming polymer thus decreasing the total color measured. Additionally, the increase in plasticizer concentration slightly enhanced light reflection from the film surface, i.e. increased in L∗ value. This effect was more pronounced at higher concentrations specifically in glycerol plasticized films. The difference in the ability of plasticizers to decrease the color may be due to the difference in the physical structure of the film. These observations are consistent with previously findings relating to the effect of plasticizer on color of edible film. (Jongjareonrak et al. 2006) reported decrease in ∆E and increase in L* value for gelatin based film plasticized with glycerol, sorbitol, ethylene glycol, PEG200 and PEG 400. Similarly, Paschoalick et al. 2003 observed a linear decrease in ∆E of edible film made from muscle proteins of Nile Tilapia by increasing the concentration of glycerol. Color of the gum cordia film (L*a*b*: 81–76,-1.7–0.6, 20–9) is comparable to some of the other biopolymer based films e.g. soy protein (L*a*b*: 88,-1.3,3), mesquite gum (89,1.5,20), mustard based biopolymer (75,1.3, 30) and chitosan (L*a*b*: 45,0.8,7) (Guerrero et al. 2011; Hendrix et al. 2012; Osés et al. 2009; Singh and Chatli 2015). However, the gum cordia film was more colored than some of the most commonly reported edible films including gelatin (95,-0.35,1.6), tapioca starch films (85,-1.08,5) and whey protein isolate films (95,-0.05,2) (Flores et al. 2007; Jongjareonrak et al. 2006; Osés et al. 2009).

Table 3.

Effect of type and concentration of plasticizer on CIE color parameters of gum cordia film

Plasticizer Concentration (%) L* a* b* E
None None 77.05 ± 1.08ab −1.76 ± 0.13a 20.91 ± 0.04n 28.22 ± 0.79i
Glycerol 10 78.07 ± 1.59abcd −1.74 ± 0.10a 15.89 ± 0.11j 24.22 ± 1.29fg
15 78.60 ± 0.99abcdef −1.33 ± 0.08b 12.89 ± 0.31d 22.06 ± 0.91bc
20 80.20 ± 1.07fg −0.91 ± 0.09de 9.97 ± 0.12c 19.23 ± 0.99a
25 80.25 ± 0.63fg −0.78 ± 0.06ef 9.50 ± 0.11b 18.96 ± 0.58a
30 81.15 ± 0.68g −0.66 ± 0.05fg 9.05 ± 0.14a 17.96 ± 0.66a
Sorbitol 10 77.74 ± 1.07abc −1.29 ± 0.06bc 16.19 ± 0.24k 24.63 ± 0.93fg
15 78.29 ± 0.83abcdef −1.26 ± 0.06bc 15.50 ± 0.28i 23.76 ± 0.74efg
20 79.78 ± 1.04defg −1.32 ± 0.11bc 14.92 ± 0.15h 22.25 ± 0.88bcde
25 79.84 ± 0.71efg −1.21 ± 0.05bc 14.58 ± 0.24g 21.96 ± 0.67b
30 80.00 ± 0.54efg −1.13 ± 0.06c 14.44 ± 0.11fg 21.76 ± 0.45b
PEG 200 10 76.90 ± 0.36ab −1.15 ± 0.09c 15.50 ± 0.07i 24.89 ± 0.31fg
15 78.28 ± 0.83abcdef −0.90 ± 0.11de 15.61 ± 0.14ij 23.82 ± 0.72fg
20 78.59 ± 1.11abcdef −0.71 ± 0.08fg 15.61 ± 0.26ij 23.56 ± 0.92cdef
25 79.37 ± 1.08cdef −0.63 ± 0.07fg 14.24 ± 0.22f 22.13 ± 0.90bcd
30 79.41 ± 1.12cdef −0.64 ± 0.04g 12.79 ± 0.14d 21.29 ± 0.96b
PEG 400 10 76.69 ± 1.58a −1.70 ± 0.09a 18.11 ± 0.16m 26.67 ± 1.27h
15 77.41 ± 0.43ab −1.60 ± 0.09a 16.95 ± 0.22l 25.36 ± 0.45gh
20 77.18 ± 1.18ab −1.61 ± 0.01a 15.87 ± 0.17j 24.92 ± 0.96fg
25 77.83 ± 1.00abc −1.15 ± 0.10c 14.69 ± 0.16gh 23.69 ± 0.82def
30 78.71 ± 1.20bcdef −0.63 ± 0.07fg 13.44 ± 0.05e 22.23 ± 1.02bcde

Data is presented as mean ± standard error, n = 3

Means with different superscript alphabets in the columns are significantly different (P < 0.05)

The light transmission (%) and transparency (A600/mm) of the gum cordia films is shown in Table 4. The films restricted the transmission of the UV light in the range of 280–200 nm. This is consistent with proportion of protein in gum cordia. The amino acids especially tyrosine, phenylalanine and tryptophan absorb UV light strongly (Guerrero et al. 2011). Similar protective strength has been reported for some protein based edible films e.g. soy protein (Guerrero et al. 2011), whey protein isolate (Gounga et al. 2007) and fish myofibrillar proteins (Shiku et al. 2003). The transparency (A600/mm) of the gum cordia film was recorded as 1.39–2.61 depending upon the type and concentration of plasticizer as observed for total color, suggesting that the film is clear enough to use without affecting the appearance of product coated. This value is comparable to previously reported transparency values for edible films e.g. gelatin (1.1–2.4), soy protein(1.4), fish myofibrillar proteins (6–36) and pee starch (1.1–2.7) (Guerrero et al. 2011; Jongjareonrak et al. 2006; Shiku et al. 2003; Zhang and Han 2006).

Table 4.

Effect of type and concentration of plasticizer on light transmission (%) and transparency (A600/mm) of gum cordia films

Plasticizer Conc. (%) Wavelength (nm) Transparency
200 280 350 400 500 600 700 800
None None 0.1 0.2 16.3 36.5 59.5 65.4 73.8 74.2 2.61 ± 0.05k
Glycerol 10 0.1 0.3 16.3 39.3 61.6 68.3 73.0 75.5 2.13± 0.08ghij
15 0.1 0.3 16.4 39.5 62.0 68.5 73.4 75.9 2.04± 0.06efg
20 0.1 0.3 16.5 39.8 62.3 68.7 73.8 76.3 1.79± 0.09cd
25 0.1 0.3 16.7 40.2 63.1 69.3 74.7 77.3 1.57 ± 0.10bcd
30 0.1 0.2 16.9 40.6 63.6 69.9 75.4 78.0 1.39 ± 0.14a
Sorbitol 10 0.1 0.3 16.2 39.0 61.2 67.1 72.5 74.9 2.25 ± 0.10ij
15 0.1 0.3 16.3 39.2 61.4 67.2 72.7 75.2 2.15 ± 0.14ghij
20 0.1 0.3 16.3 39.3 61.6 67.2 73.0 75.5 1.94 ± 0.04ef
25 0.1 0.3 16.5 39.6 62.1 67.8 73.6 76.1 1.70 ± 0.11bc
30 0.1 0.3 16.6 40.0 62.7 68.2 74.3 76.9 1.67 ± 0.07bc
PEG 200 10 0.1 0.3 16.3 39.2 61.5 66.8 72.9 75.3 2.21 ± 0.04hij
15 0.1 0.3 16.5 39.7 62.2 67.4 73.7 76.2 2.18 ± 0.07ghij
20 0.1 0.3 16.7 40.1 62.9 68.0 74.5 77.1 1.90 ± 0.04de
25 0.1 0.3 16.7 40.3 63.2 68.3 74.9 77.5 1.68 ± 0.06bc
30 0.1 0.3 16.7 40.3 63.1 68.2 74.8 77.4 1.66 ± 0.05bc
PEG 400 10 0.1 0.3 16.2 39.0 61.2 66.0 72.5 74.9 2.28 ± 0.13ij
15 0.1 0.3 16.4 39.4 61.8 66.7 73.2 75.7 2.17 ± 0.09ghij
20 0.1 0.3 16.5 39.8 62.4 67.3 73.9 76.4 2.14 ± 0.10ghij
25 0.1 0.3 16.7 40.2 63.0 67.9 74.6 77.2 2.08 ± 0.04fgh
30 0.1 0.3 16.7 40.3 63.2 68.1 74.9 77.5 2.10 ± 0.07gh

Data is presented as mean ± standard error, n = 3

Means with different superscript alphabets in the columns are significantly different (P < 0.05)

Conclusion

Anionic polysaccharide from C.myxa can be used to form film using plasticizers. The resultant films had improved sorption isotherm and optical properties as compared to other available edible coatings. The effectiveness of various plasticizers for film forming was evaluated by varying their concentrations. The glycerol was found to be the best for making edible film. Gum cordia films exhibited sigmoidal shape isotherms curves which can be modeled using GAB equation. Plasticizers decreased the energy required to attach the water molecule to sorption sites in polymer. Incorporation of plasticizer to gum cordia decreased the total color of the film. Gum cordia formed transparent films with all plasticizers. Gum cordia films were excellent barrier to UV light.

References

  1. Akhtar MJ, et al. Antioxidant capacity and light-aging study of HPMC films functionalized with natural plant extract. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;89:1150–1158. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.03.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Azam M, Haq MA, Hasnain A. Osmotic dehydration of mango cubes: effect of novel gluten-based coating. Dry Technol. 2013;31:120–127. doi: 10.1080/07373937.2012.727055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baik M-Y, Chinachoti P. Effects of glycerol and moisture gradient on thermomechanical properties of white bread. J Agric Food Chem. 2001;49:4031–4038. doi: 10.1021/jf0101096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bertuzzi MA, Castro Vidaurre EF, Armada M, Gottifredi JC. Water vapor permeability of edible starch based films. J Food Eng. 2007;80:972–978. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.07.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bhat R, Karim AA. Towards producing novel fish gelatin films by combination treatments of ultraviolet radiation and sugars (ribose and lactose) as cross-linking agents. Journal of Food Science and Technology-Mysore. 2014;51:1326–1333. doi: 10.1007/s13197-012-0652-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blahovec J, Yanniotis S. Modified classification of sorption isotherms. J Food Eng. 2009;91:72–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.08.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chinma CE, Ariahu CC, Alakali JS. Effect of temperature and relative humidity on the water vapour permeability and mechanical properties of cassava starch and soy protein concentrate based edible films. J Food Sci Technol-Mysore. 2015;52:2380–2386. doi: 10.1007/s13197-013-1227-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Coupland JN, Shaw NB, Monahan FJ, Dolores O'Riordan E, O'Sullivan M. Modeling the effect of glycerol on the moisture sorption behavior of whey protein edible films. J Food Eng. 2000;43:25–30. doi: 10.1016/S0260-8774(99)00129-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Debeaufort F, Voilley A. Methylcellulose-based edible films and coatings: 2. mechanical and thermal properties as a function of plasticizer content. J Agric Food Chem. 1997;45:685–689. doi: 10.1021/jf9606621. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Donhowe IG, Fennema O. The effects of plasticizers on crystallinity, permeability, and mechanical properties of methylcellulose films. J Food Process Preserv. 1993;17:247–257. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-4549.1993.tb00729.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Flores S, Famá L, Rojas AM, Goyanes S, Gerschenson L. Physical properties of tapioca-starch edible films: Influence of filmmaking and potassium sorbate. Food Res Int. 2007;40:257–265. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2006.02.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gennadios A, Weller CL, RF T. temperature effect on oxygen permeability of edible protein-based films. J Food Sci. 1993;58:212–214. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1993.tb03247.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gontard N, Guilbert S, Cuq J-L. Water and glycerol as plasticizers affect mechanical and water vapor barrier properties of an edible wheat gluten film. J Food Sci. 1993;58:206–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1993.tb03246.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gounga ME, Xu S-Y, Wang Z. Whey protein isolate-based edible films as affected by protein concentration, glycerol ratio and pullulan addition in film formation. J Food Eng. 2007;83:521–530. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.04.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Greenspan L. Humidity fixed points of binary saturated aqueous solutions. J Res Natl Bur Stand. 1977;81:89–96. doi: 10.6028/jres.081A.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Guerrero P, Nur Hanani ZA, Kerry JP, La Caba K D. Characterization of soy protein-based films prepared with acids and oils by compression. J Food Eng. 2011;107:41–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.06.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Guldas M, Akpinar-Bayizit A, Ozcan T, Yilmaz-Ersan L. Effects of edible film coatings on shelf-life of mustafakemalpasa sweet, a cheese based dessert. J Food Sci Technol-Mysore. 2010;47:476–481. doi: 10.1007/s13197-010-0081-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Haq MA, Azam M, Hasnain A. Gum cordia as carrier of antioxidants: effects on lipid oxidation of peanuts. J Food Sci Technol-Mysore. 2015;52:2366–2372. doi: 10.1007/s13197-013-1199-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Haq MA, Alam MJ, Hasnain A. Gum Cordia: A novel edible coating to increase the shelf life of Chilgoza (Pinus gerardiana) LWT Food Sci Technol. 2013;50:306–311. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2012.05.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Haq MA, Hasnain A, Azam M. Characterization of edible gum cordia film: Effects of plasticizers. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2014;55:163–169. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2013.09.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Haq MA, Hasnain A, Jamil K, Haider MS. Extraction and characterization of gum from Cordia myxa. Asian J Chem. 2014;26:122–126. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hendrix KM, Morra MJ, Lee H-B, Min SC. Defatted mustard seed meal-based biopolymer film development. Food Hydrocoll. 2012;26:118–125. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.04.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jongjareonrak A, Benjakul S, Visessanguan W, Tanaka M. ) Effects of plasticizers on the properties of edible films from skin gelatin of bigeye snapper and brownstripe red snapper. Eur Food Res Technol. 2006;222:229–235. doi: 10.1007/s00217-005-0004-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kang HJ, Won MY, Lee SJ, Min SC. Plasticization and moisture sensitivity of potato peel-based biopolymer films. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2015;24:1703–1710. doi: 10.1007/s10068-015-0221-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Laohakunjit N, Noomhorm A. Effect of plasticizers on mechanical and barrier properties of rice starch film. Starch -STARKE. 2004;56:348–356. doi: 10.1002/star.200300249. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lim LT, Mine Y, Tung MA. Barrier and tensile properties of transglutaminase cross-linked gelatin films as affected by relative humidity, temperature, and glycerol content. J Food Sci. 1999;64:616–622. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1999.tb15096.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mali S, Sakanaka ,LS, Yamashita F, Grossmann ,MVE. Water sorption and mechanical properties of cassava starch films and their relation to plasticizing effect. Carbohydr Polym. 2005;60:283–289. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.01.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Osés J, Fabregat-Vázquez M, Pedroza-Islas R, Tomás SA, Cruz-Orea A, Maté JI. Development and characterization of composite edible films based on whey protein isolate and mesquite gum. J Food Eng. 2009;92:56–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.10.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Paschoalick TM, Garcia FT, Sobral PJA, Habitante A. Characterization of some functional properties of edible films based on muscle proteins of Nile Tilapia. Food Hydrocoll. 2003;17:419–427. doi: 10.1016/S0268-005X(03)00031-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ruiz-Navajas Y, Viuda-Martos M, Barber X, Sendra E, Perez-Alvarez JA, Fernandez-Lopez J. Effect of chitosan edible films added with Thymus moroderi and Thymus piperella essential oil on shelf-life of cooked cured ham. J Food Sci Technol-Mysore. 2015;52:6493–6501. doi: 10.1007/s13197-015-1733-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Shiku Y, Hamaguchi PY, Tanaka M. Effect of pH on the preparation of edible films based on fish myofibrillar proteins. Fish Sci. 2003;69:1026–1032. doi: 10.1046/j.1444-2906.2003.00722.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Singh TP, Chatli MK, Sahoo J. Development of chitosan based edible films: process optimization using response surface methodology. J Food Sci Technol-Mysore. 2015;52:2530–2543. doi: 10.1007/s13197-014-1318-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tao Z, Weng W-Y, Cao M-J, Liu G-M, W-J S, Osako K, Tanaka M. Effect of blend ratio and pH on the physical properties of edible composite films prepared from silver carp surimi and skin gelatin J Food Sci Technol-Mysore. 2015;52:1618–1625. doi: 10.1007/s13197-013-1186-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Timmermann EO, Chirife J, Iglesias HA. Water sorption isotherms of foods and foodstuffs: BET or GAB parameters? J Food Eng. 2001;48:19–31. doi: 10.1016/S0260-8774(00)00139-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Vieira MGA, da Silva MA, dos Santos LO, Beppu MM. Natural-based plasticizers and biopolymer films. A review European Polymer J. 2011;47:254–263. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.12.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Weng W, Wu F. Water resistance and mechanical property improvement of tilapia (Tilapia zillii) scale gelatin films by dehydrated thermal treatment. J Food Sci Technol-Mysore. 2015;52:3358–3366. doi: 10.1007/s13197-014-1401-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Yang L, Paulson AT. Mechanical and water vapour barrier properties of edible gellan films. Food Res Int. 2000;33:563–570. doi: 10.1016/S0963-9969(00)00092-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhang Y, Han ,JH. Plasticization of pea starch films with monosaccharides and polyols. J Food Sci. 2006;71:E253–E261. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00075.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Food Science and Technology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES