Abstract
Introduction
Sex workers are disproportionately infected with HIV worldwide. Significant focus has been placed on understanding the structural determinants of HIV and designing related interventions. Although there is growing international evidence that policing is an important structural HIV determinant among sex workers, the evidence has not been systematically reviewed.
Methods
We conducted a systematic review of quantitative studies to examine the effects of policing on HIV and STI infection and HIV-related outcomes (condom use; syringe use; number of clients; HIV/STI testing and access) among cis and trans women sex workers. Databases included PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Sociological Abstracts, Popline, Global Health (OVID), Web of Science, IBSS, IndMed and WHOLIS. We searched for studies that included police practices as an exposure for HIV or STI infection or HIV-related outcomes.
Results
Of the 137 peer-reviewed articles identified for full text review, 14 were included, representing sex workers' experiences with police across five settings. Arrest was the most commonly explored measure with between 6 and 45% of sex workers reporting having ever been arrested. Sexual coercion was observed between 3 and 37% of the time and police extortion between 12 and 28% across studies. Half the studies used a single measure to capture police behaviours. Studies predominantly focused on “extra-legal policing practices,” with insufficient attention to the role of “legal enforcement activities”. All studies found an association between police behaviours and HIV or STI infection, or a related risk behaviour.
Conclusions
The review points to a small body of evidence that confirms policing practices as an important structural HIV determinant for sex workers, but studies lack generalizability with respect to identifying those police behaviours most relevant to women's HIV risk environment.
Keywords: systematic review, HIV, police, sex work, arrest, STI, measurement
Introduction
Globally, sex workers, defined as those who exchange sex for money or other goods have a disproportionate burden of HIV [1–7]. For over a decade, public health and social science research has sought to more clearly link HIV to the social production of behavioural risk and transmission [8–11]. The conceptual shift from individual-focused HIV prevention (e.g. behaviour change, communication) to environmental-structural interventions emerged as far back as the 1990s among female sex workers (FSWs) [12–14]. Recent research places these intervention efforts in context, highlighting a lack of empirical work to delineate the epidemiology of structural risk factors and HIV among FSWs [15]. An assortment of theoretically informed frameworks exist to elucidate the dynamic socio-economic production of HIV infection across levels, from the macro (e.g. stigmatization of sex work, laws governing possession of drugs) to the micro (e.g. local policing practices, access to drug treatment programs), and how such pathways relate to interpersonal, individual and biological factors [15–17]. A recent call to action to address the HIV response to sex work included a focus on structural reforms and interventions [18]. It is fundamental to the scientific credibility of prioritizing structural interventions to ensure that the measurement of structural determinants (e.g. stigma, local policing practices) is properly operationalized, and if possible, independently associated with specific HIV-related outcomes (e.g. condom use, HIV or STI infection). Law is increasingly viewed as a significant HIV determinant, but one that is a “complex phenomenon” in its own right [19], operating at different structural levels to influence HIV risk behaviours and acquisition (e.g. macro-level laws, meso-level legal policies and micro-level policing practices.)
Laws and policies that influence HIV risk
Criminal laws related to sex work have been linked to fewer public health benefits, and yet it remains the dominant global approach [20–23]. Across different settings punitive laws take a variety of forms, from criminalizing the transaction itself to prohibiting acts related to sex work, such as solicitation, being found in a brothel or communicating for the purposes of prostitution [24,25]. Other laws of more general application are also frequently employed (e.g. loitering, public indecency, disorderly behaviour offences). Modelling undertaken by Shannon et al. suggests the decriminalization of sex work could have one of the greatest effects on the course of the HIV epidemic across settings with concentrated or generalized HIV epidemics [26]. Potentially, sex workers who inject drugs risk exposure to both drug- and sex worker-related laws. Research on drug-related law enforcement practices and its positive association with HIV prevalence among people who inject drugs points to the limited deterrent effect of such practices, and the parallel need for reforms to drug laws and policies [27–30].
Policing practices and sex workers' HIV risk
The transformative process by which the law “on the books,” e.g. statutes, regulations and court decisions, is manifested in the “street level” practices of the police is of central importance [19]. Legal scholars have long demonstrated the gap between written law and law enforcement [19,31]. In settings in which sex work is criminalized, the police are able to exercise considerable discretion in shaping law enforcement activities regarding sex workers. Policing practices can directly and indirectly affect sex workers HIV-related behaviours. A key example of a direct effect is the confiscation or destruction of condoms, which can prompt unprotected sex, as has been documented worldwide [32–36]. In the case of sex workers who also inject drugs, the confiscation of drugs and injecting equipment by police in the absence of arrest is associated with HIV infection [37–42]. Policing practices that indirectly affect sex workers’ HIV risk behaviours include periodic crackdowns or moving women off corners to address community disquiet [34,43–47]. These strategies can displace sex workers to unfamiliar areas, increase their potential exposure to violence and severely limit their negotiating power with clients [43,47–51].
Egregious abuses of police power are receiving particular attention in the literature. The normalisation of sexual violence as a tool of law enforcement has been documented worldwide [52], including forced unprotected sex [53–57] and coercive sex (e.g. sex in exchange for no arrest) [36,55,58–65]. Other rights violations that sex workers suffer at the hands of the police include verbal harassment and humiliation [64,66–69]; financial extortion to avoid arrest [4,54,57,61–63,70,71]; intimidation or physical violence [54,55,64,72,73] and arbitrary arrest or detention, frequently accompanied by illegal searches and physical violence [50,56,58,70,74].
Previous reviews
A systematic review of violence against sex workers by Deering et al. [75] identified policing practice (either lawful or unlawful) as a key correlate. Another systematic review by Shannon et al. [26] reviewed data for HIV prevalence and incidence, condom use and structural determinants among FSWs. Most of the 149 articles included in the review addressed other structural determinants, with seven articles measuring policing practices as a structural vulnerability a priori within women's work environment. The authors concluded that police abuses and law enforcement strategies are key barriers to HIV prevention efforts among FSWs worldwide. In addition to these systematic reviews, two other non-systematic reviews of the evidence have provided important contributions to the field. Decker et al. placed a spotlight on police abuses as a contributing factor to sex workers’ experience of human rights violations [52], while Tenni et al. reviewed the scope and opportunities for interventions that address policing practices towards sex workers [76].
Current review
The goal of the current systematic review is to provide a focus on how quantitative research has operationalized the measurement of law enforcement practices as a structural determinant of HIV for women (including transgender) sex workers. The review builds on previous work by critiquing the strength of the evidence to support the legal environment's role as a structural HIV determinant with respect to micro-level policing practices, situated as they are in a broader and more complex legal environment. An important distinction in this review is the inclusion of search terms for cis and trans women sex workers. The review also includes a broader range of HIV-related outcomes, and seeks to provide a more critical review of methodological issues in interpreting findings in the existing quantitative literature.
Methods
Search strategy and selection criteria
We followed PRISMA guidelines in conducting the systematic review. Subject headings and associated terms were initially developed and tested in PubMed and adapted for other database specific categories (see Supplementary file 1 for full list of search terms). The search strategy involved two extensive search components for each database, and was developed to reliably capture: (1) police enforcement strategies, both legal and illegal; and (2) terms relevant to our population of interest (i.e. sex workers). A comprehensive review of all major databases was undertaken on 18 September 2015 (BS). Databases searched for this review were PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Sociological Abstracts, Popline, Global Health (OVID), PAIS International, Criminal Justice Abstracts, Web of Science, IBSS, WHO Regional Databases, IndMed and WHOLIS. Ancestry searches were also conducted for references and the relevant citations to all studies.
We included articles that examined police practices as an exposure variable for HIV and/or STI infection or HIV-related outcomes. The studies under consideration were required to use quantitative univariate or multivariable methods and to have been published in a peer-reviewed journal. Primary outcomes of interest were HIV infection, STI infection and STI symptoms. Secondary outcomes were HIV/STI testing and access, number of clients, condom use and syringe use. Studies were included for cis and trans women who exchanged sex for money or other goods (i.e. sex work); we excluded studies focused exclusively on male sex workers or adolescents, and studies only including indoor work environments (e.g. brothels, massage parlours, hotels, saunas). Based on a signal to noise ratio of each year searched, we limited our search to articles published between 1 January 2006 and 18 September 2015. Articles were limited to those published in the English language, but were not limited by either quantitative study design or setting.
Screening and data abstraction
Article citations were organized and uploaded to Endnote, and subsequently reviewed using Rayyan, a web application for exploring and filtering systematic review searches [77]. The title and abstracts of all publications were originally screened by two independent reviewers (BS and KT) to retain those that clearly met the inclusion criteria, or for whom the full text of the article had to be reviewed before a final determination on inclusion could be made. Two independent reviewers (KF and BS) undertook full text reviews, and any discrepancies as to final inclusion were discussed with the senior reviewer (SS) to reach a consensus as to whether to exclude or include any specific article. Data were abstracted using a standard abstraction form for each study (see Supplementary file 1). Due to the lack of validated quality assessment checklists for cross-sectional studies, the authors undertook a critical appraisal of studies during the data abstraction process [78–81].
As shown in Table 1, we set out the police measures for each study and how frequently they occurred (if reported), along with the primary outcomes of interest (HIV infection, STI infection, STI symptoms) and secondary outcomes (access to HIV services, number of clients, condom use and syringe use). If results from both univariate and multivariate models were presented, we extracted the (adjusted) associations of the multivariate model only.
Table 1.
Study and intervention characteristics, description of HIV infection and sexually transmitted infection outcomes and police measures
| Author, publication date | Country (cities) | Legal status | Study dates | Study design | Sample size, Population of interest | Police measure | % Reporting police measure | Outcome | % With outcome (overall/population with police measure only) | Association (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chen et al., 2012 [82] | Mexico (Nuevo Laredo, Ciudad Hidalgo) |
Regulated in specific zones but soliciting in public is illegal |
2009–2010 | Cross-sectional | 200 FSWs | Ever arrested | 28.6 | - Current STI symptoms | 16.5/45.5 | aOR: 2.3 (1.0, 5.0) |
| Arrested in prior year | 16.5 | - Current STI symptoms | 16.5/27.3 | OR: 2.2 (0.9, 5.4) | ||||||
| Decker et al., 2012 [4] | Russia (Moscow) | Selling sex is illegal in any venue | 2005 | Cross-sectional | 147 FSWs | Sexual coercion | 36.6 | - Current HIV infection/ STI (any) | 31.3/44.2 | aOR: 2.5 (1.2, 5.4) |
| Decker et al., 2014 [83] | Russia (Kazan, Krasnoyarsk, Tomsk) | Selling sex is illegal in any venue. | 2011 | Cross-sectional | 754 FSWs | Sexual coercion | 3.1 | - Current HIV Infection | 3.9/13.0 | aOR: 3.5 (0.9, 12.9) |
| Extortion | 28.4 | - Current HIV Infection | 3.9/5.1 | aOR: 1.1 (0.5, 2.2) | ||||||
| Erausquin et al., 2011 [70] | India (Rajahmundry) |
Organizing commercial sex in any place and soliciting in public is illegal | 2009–2010 | Cross-sectional | 835 FSWs | Sexual coercion | 10.9 | - Recent STI symptoms - Inconsistent condom use (C) - Accepted more money for sex with no condom (C) |
48.5/74.7 24.0/31.9 18.1/28.6 |
aOR: 3.6 (2.1, 5.9) aOR: 1.5 (0.9, 2.5) aOR: 2.0 (1.2, 3.4) |
| Extortion | 12.0 | - Recent STI symptoms - Inconsistent condom (C) - Accepted more money for sex with no condom (C) |
48.5/81.0 24.0/41.0 18.1/34.0 |
aOR: 5.1 (3.0, 8.7) aOR: 2.4 (1.5, 3.7) aOR: 2.8 (1.7, 4.4) |
||||||
| Condoms confiscated | 7.4 | - Recent STI symptoms - Inconsistent condom (C) - Accepted more money for sex with no condom (C) |
48.5/74.2 24.0/51.6 18.1/43.6 |
aOR: 3.1 (1.7, 5.7) aOR: 3.6 (2.1, 6.1) aOR: 4.1 (2.3, 7.2) |
||||||
| Workplace raid | 26.8 | - Recent STI symptoms - Inconsistent condom use (C) - Accepted more money for sex with no condom (C) |
48.5/71.4 24.0/26.4 18.1/21.9 |
aOR: 3.7 (2.6, 5.3) aOR: 1.2 (0.8, 1.7) aOR: 1.5 (1.0, 2.3) |
||||||
| Arrested during prior 6 months | 12.0 | - Recent STI symptoms - Inconsistent condom use (C) - Accepted more money for sex with no condom (C) |
48.5/77.0 24.0/35.0 18.1/31.0 |
aOR: 3.8 (2.3, 6.2) aOR: 1.8 (1.1, 2.9) aOR: 2.4 (1.4, 3.9) |
||||||
| Erausquin et al., 2014 [84] | India (Rajahmundry) |
Organizing commercial sex in any place and soliciting in public is illegal | 2006–2010 | Cross-sectional | 1680 FSWs | Sexual coercion | 11.1 | - Recent STI symptoms - Inconsistent condom use (C) - Accepted more money for sex with no condom (C) |
44.3/65.6 34.2/33.9 21.3/33.3 |
aOR: 2.2 (1.6, 3.1) aOR: 1.2 (0.8, 1.6) aOR: 2.0 (1.4, 2.9) |
| Extortion | 14.8 | - Recent STI symptoms - Inconsistent condom use (C) - Accepted more money for sex with no condom (C) |
44.3/64.9 34.2/42.3 21.3/36.3 |
aOR: 2.4 (1.8, 3.2) aOR: 1.6 (1.2, 2.1) aOR: 2.5 (1.8, 3.3) |
||||||
| Condoms confiscated | 7.6 | - Recent STI symptoms - Inconsistent condom (C) - Accepted more money for sex with no condom (C) |
44.3/66.4 34.2/43.8 21.3/46.9 |
aOR: 2.4 (1.6, 3.6) aOR: 1.7 (1.2, 2.5) aOR: 3.8 (2.6, 5.6) |
||||||
| Workplace raid | 36.1 | - Recent STI symptoms - Inconsistent condom (C) - Accepted more money for sex with no condom (C) |
44.3/58.3 34.2/34.8 21.3/26.5 |
aOR: 2.2 (1.8, 2.8) aOR: 1.1 (0.9, 1.4) aOR: 1.6 (1.2, 2.0) |
||||||
| Arrested during prior 6 months | 14.5 | - Recent STI symptoms - Inconsistent condom use (C) - Accepted more money for sex with no condom (C) |
44.3/60.1 34.2/35.8 21.3/28.8 |
aOR: 1.7 (1.3, 2.3) aOR: 1.2 (0.9, 1.6) aOR: 1.5 (1.1, 2.1) |
||||||
| Summary measure (1 police interaction) | 19.8 | - Recent STI symptoms - Inconsistent condom
(C) - Accepted more money sex with no condom (C) |
44.3/52.1 34.2/29.5 21.3/18.1 |
aOR: 2.0 (1.5, 2.6) aOR: 0.9 (0.7, 1.2) aOR: 1.0 (0.7, 1.4) | ||||||
| Summary measure (2 or more police interaction) | 22.7 | - Recent STI symptoms - Inconsistent condom use (C) - Accepted more money for sex with no condom (C) |
44.3/63.1 34.2/38.2 21.3/33.3 |
aOR: 3.0 (2.3, 3.9) aOR: 1.4 (1.0, 1.8) aOR: 2.4 (1.8, 3.2) |
||||||
| Erickson et al., 2015 [85] | Uganda (Gulu) |
Selling sex is illegal in any venue | 2011–2012 | Cross-sectional | 400 FSWs | Police presence rushed negotiations | 37.3 | - Dual contraceptive use (past 6 months) | 45.0/31.0 | aOR: 0.7 (0.4, 1.0) |
| Displacement by police | 28.9 | - Dual contraceptive use (past 6 months) | 45.0/28.0 | OR: 0.9 (0.6, 1.4) | ||||||
| Gertler and Shah, 2011 [86] | Ecuador (various) | Regulated indoors. No laws govern street-based sex work but public order offences are used | 2003 | Cross-sectional | 2914 FSWs | Street enforcement | NA | - Current STI (any) - Ever STI Infection - Current herpes infection |
NA NA NA |
Beta: −0.1a
Beta: −0.3a Beta: −0.1a |
| Pando et al., 2013 [87] | Argentina (various) | Organizing commercial sex in any place and soliciting in public is illegal | 2006–2009 | Cross-sectional | 1255 FSWs | Ever arrested | 45.4 | - Current HIV infection - Current syphilis infection - Inconsistent condom use (N-C) - Inconsistent condom (C) |
2.0/3.2 22.4/29.5 82.4/84.4 11.4/14.7 |
aOR: 1.8 (1.1, 3.0) aOR: 1.5 (1.2, 1.7) aOR: 1.0 (0.8, 1.3) aOR: 1.1 (0.9, 1.4) |
| Pitpitan et al., 2015 [88] | Mexico (Ciudad Juarez) |
Regulated in specific zones but soliciting in public is illegal |
2010 | Randomized control trial | 213 FSWs–IDUs | Syringe confiscation | NA | - Safe injection | NA | aOR: 0.6 (0.4, 1.0) |
| Qiao et al., 2014 [89] | China (Guangxi) | Selling sex is illegal in any venue | 2011 | Cross-sectional | 794 FSWs | Ever arrested | 5.7 | - Consistent condom
use (C) - Access HIV testing - Access HIV prevention services |
<39/NA <50/NA 73/NA |
OR: 0.8 (0.4, 1.5) aOR: 2.8 (1.2, 6.2) aOR: 4.6 (0.9, 23.3) |
| Shannon et al., 2009 [51] | Canada (Vancouver) | Organizing commercial sex in any place and soliciting in public is illegalb | 2006 | Cross-sectional | 205 FSWs–TWS | Displacement by police | 44.4 | - Pressured into unprotected sexual intercourse with client in last 6 months | 24.9/38.4 | aOR: 3.1 (1.4, 7.4) |
| Zoning restriction following previous charge | 8.7 | - Pressured into unprotected sexual intercourse with client in last 6 months | 24.9/50.0 | aOR: 3.4 (1.2, 9.4) | ||||||
| Strathdee et al., 2011 [90] | Mexico (Cuidad Juarez, Tijuana) |
Regulated in specific zones but soliciting in public is illegal |
2008–2009 | Cross-sectional | 620 FSWs–IDUs | Syringe confiscation | 29.0 | - Current HIV infection | 5.3/8.1 | aOR: 2.4 (1.2, 5.0) |
| Strathdee et al., 2013 [5] | Mexico (Cuidad Juarez) |
Regulated in specific zones but soliciting in public is illegal |
2008–2010 | Randomized control trial | 300 FSWs–IDUs | Arrested during prior 6 months | 49.0 | - HIV/STI incidenced | 67.4/NA | NA |
| Mexico (Tijuana) | 2008–2010 | Randomized control trial | 284 FSWs–IDUs | Arrested during prior 6 months | 40.9 | - HIV/STI incidenced | 44.3/NA | aRR: 2.7 (1.4,5.2)c | ||
| Zhang et al., 2013 [91] | China (Guangxi) | Selling sex is illegal in any venue | 2011 | Cross-sectional | 720 FSWs | Ever arrested | NA | - Unprotected sex in the last sex act | NA | aOR: 2.6 (1.4, 4.7) |
Population-level estimates across communities of adjusted beta-coefficient using linear regression
The law changed in 2014 to decriminalize but this research was conducted prior to the change
Population-level estimates from Poisson regression across different risk groups
HIV/STI incidence density over 12 months across four different intervention groups.
FSW=cis female sex worker; TWS=transgender woman sex worker; IDU=injection drug use; C=client; N-C=non-commercial partner; OR=odds ratio; aOR=adjusted odds ratio; aRR=adjusted relative risk; Beta=beta-coefficient from linear regression.
Data synthesis
Due to the diversity in policing determinants and HIV outcomes, a meta-analysis was not conducted. Instead, to guide our review, we have adapted a conceptual model that provides a legal determinants framework of HIV-related outcomes for sex workers (Figure 1), and draw on previous ecological [19] and risk environment frameworks [16,17]. The framework highlights how macro-level laws and meso-level policies are critical influences on sex workers’ HIV risk environment. However, it is at the micro-level of policing practices that laws and policies become interpreted in the everyday decision-making of police officers. The framework draws a distinction between enforcement practices within the law and those outside of it, which we define as “extra-legal policing practices” [30]. The latter represent behaviours that sit along a spectrum from misconduct to illegal behaviours, with human rights violations a prevalent feature in some settings.
Figure 1.
Framework of law as a structural determinant for health outcomes of sex workers, adapted from Burris and colleagues [19].
Results
The search process is described in Figure 2, and results are displayed in Table 1. Overall, 14 quantitative studies [4,5,51,70,82–91] were identified that met our inclusion criteria. These papers represent the current empirical evidence that policing practices are a key micro-structural determinant for HIV risk among sex workers.
Figure 2.
Flowchart of search strategy.
Study characteristics
The studies cover a fairly diverse range of geographic regions given the number of studies, but the diversity of countries within regions was small. Seven of the studies were conducted in the Americas. Four were in Mexico, the two from Eastern Europe were both in Russia, one was in the Central East African country of Uganda, four were in Asia with two in India and two in China. Five of the 14 papers were conducted in settings in which selling sex in any venue is illegal [4,83,85,89,91]. For the four studies set in Mexico [5,82,88,90], sex work is regulated in specific zones, but it remains illegal to solicit sex in public. Four of the 14 studies [51,70,84,87] were in settings in which it is illegal to solicit sex in any public place or organize commercial sex in any place. In one study [86], indoor sex work is regulated and while no laws govern street-based sex work, police often employ public order offences [92].
One of the studies considered women inclusive of trans [51], while cis-woman sex workers who inject drugs were considered in two of the 14 papers [5,90]. All of the studies except one included samples of sex workers from multiple sex work environments (e.g. brothels, street, motels). The exception was one study exclusively focused on truck stops as a sex work venue [82]. Only two out of the 14 studies statedthat both over and under 18-year-olds were included in their sample [4,85].
Study design and measures
Twelve of the papers (86%) used a cross-sectional study design, while two (14%) analyzed the results of the same randomized controlled study [5,88], conducted in the context of an intervention. In nine of the 14 studies (64%) there was a single measure for police behaviour. Considering legal enforcement practices as set out in our conceptual framework, five of the six studies measuring this concept looked at arrest in some form (i.e. any arrest ever, a history of arrest or arrest in the last six months) as the only measure of police practices [5,82,87,89,91]. Only one study defined arrest as arrest for sex worker-related activity [87]. The remaining three single measure studies look at what we term “extra-legal policing practices”. Two measured syringe confiscation in the context of FSWs who inject drugs in settings where syringes can be obtained legally by prescription [88,90], and one looked at sexual coercion by police [4]. The remaining five studies (36%) considered between two and five measures to assess police practices towards sex workers. In two of these studies, police measures were made up of five items [70,84], although both of these used the same data and measures. Those papers containing more than one measure included a mixture of extra-legal policing practices, such as sexual coercion (e.g. sex exchanged for leniency or to avoid arrest or trouble) [70,83,84]; extortion (e.g. money, gifts, bribe) [70,83,84]; and condom confiscation [70,84]. Day-to-day policing strategies aside from arrest included, displacing sex workers and zoning restrictions [51], conducting workplace raids [70,84] and general policing presence [85].
Three papers considered the impact of interventions. The only one that focused on changing police behaviours evaluated the impact of a community-led structural intervention, targeting both FSWs and the police (including providing access to STI treatment, educating officers about HIV and conducting sensitivity meetings between officers and FSWs) [84]. The paper analyzed data from cross-sectional studies conducted over three different time points during the course of the intervention to explore changes in STI symptoms, inconsistent condom use and accepting more money for sex without a condom. The other two papers analyzed the results of a study that used a 2x2 randomized factorial trial in which participants were exposed to a combination of either a 30-minute didactic or interactive intervention focused on safe injection and sex practices [5,88]. One paper evaluated the efficacy of the different interventions on HIV and STI infection incidence, adjusting for the level of “recent arrest” in each intervention group [5]. The other paper looked at the efficacy of the interventions in reducing receptive needle sharing, with police behaviours as moderators (i.e. arrest and syringe confiscation) [88].
Frequency of police measures
Overall, the studies included in our analysis found that police measures were regularly reported by sex workers (Table 1). A simple average across the most common reported police measures within each study suggests that 34% of sex workers experienced at least one police measure (range: 6–49%). This average suggests that police measures are very common, granting that it is not a meta-analysis and must be evaluated cautiously. Arrest was the most commonly explored measure with between 6 and 45% of sex workers reporting having ever been arrested, similar to the level found in studies that were limited to measuring arrests in the last six months or a year (range: 12–49%). Sexual coercion was observed between 3 and 37% of the time and police extortion between 12 and 28% across studies.
Study outcomes
We found that police measures were consistently, positively associated with either our primary (HIV infection or STI infection/symptoms) or secondary (HIV/STI testing and access, number of clients, condom use, and syringe use) outcomes of interest. Having ever been arrested was consistently associated with an increased risk of being currently infected with HIV or an STI. The strength of the association ranged between 1.5 and 2.3 times. It was also associated with inconsistent condom use (aOR range: 1.1–2.6). One study did find that arrest was associated with an increased probability of being tested for HIV (aOR: 2.7). Studies that were limited to arrest in the prior six months or a year still found positive associations with HIV and STI incidence (aOR: 2.7), current/recent STI (aOR range: 1.7–3.8) and inconsistent condom use (aOR range: 1.2–2.4). Other police measures were also found to be important. For example, sexual coercion was associated with current or recent HIV or STI infection (aOR range: 2.2–3.6) and inconsistent condom use (aOR range: 1.2–2). Similarly, police extortion was associated with current or recent HIV or STI infection (aOR range: 1.1–5.1) and inconsistent condom use (aOR range: 1.6–2.8). Syringe confiscation was associated with a 2.4 times increased odds of current HIV infection and 0.6 times the odds of safe injection. Finally, displacement by the police was associated with both inconsistent condom use (aOR: 3.1 times) and reduced (although not significantly) dual contraceptive use (aOR: 0.9).
In the 10 studies in which HIV infection or STI infection and symptoms were an outcome, eight found a significant positive association with at least one police behaviour. One notable exception is a study in Ecuador that found street enforcement was negatively associated with STI symptoms that ever occurred or were current. This represents the only study that found that a police measure was significantly associated with a reduction in any of our outcomes of interest. However, the results from this study should be treated with caution because the analyses were conducted at a population level across different communities with the outcome and exposure data coming from different sources. All seven papers that looked at HIV risk behaviours, instead of (or in addition to) HIV infection or STI infection as an outcome, found a significant association with at least one police behaviour. The most commonly measured HIV risk behaviour was inconsistent condom use [51,70,84,87,89].
Of those studies that were interventions [5,84,88], one directly considered the effectiveness of intervening on interactions between sex workers and the police [84]. The study in question reports that both negative interactions between FSWs and police, and the measures of HIV sexual risk, declined over time from early in the intervention to full implementation. Although these findings are important, the authors also report that the strong association between negative police experiences and HIV risk (e.g. STI symptoms, inconsistent condom use) remained stable and in some cases increased. The other intervention studies both involved data from the same injection risk intervention [5,88]. One found that the intervention “buffered” the negative impacts of police behaviours on risky injection practice [88].
Discussion
This systematic review points to an important but nascent field of quantitative evidence supporting the significance of policing practices as an important structural HIV determinant in the lives of women who sell sex. We found substantial heterogeneity in both the police measures and the health outcomes considered by the different studies. However, despite the wide array of different associations considered, a significant association between the police measure and a HIV- and STI-associated outcome was reported across a wide range of police measures in the vast majority of analyses of the studies. These findings point to the potentially pivotal role that the police have as a structural determinant for HIV in this vulnerable population.
Methodology
The majority of included studies are cross-sectional, a study design often used for ease and practicality, particularly with respect to hard-to-reach populations, such as sex workers. Consequently, however, temporality and causation are difficult to establish. Ideally, there is a need for more prospective cohort designs, in which longitudinal data will allow for a more rigorous examination of the cumulative effects of negative police interactions on sex workers’ HIV-related outcomes. Aside from the limitations of relying primarily on cross-sectional study designs, other methodological limitations exist within the 14 studies. For example, three of the 10 studies [70,82,84] (30%) analyzed HIV or STIs not on the basis of biological testing, but instead relied on self-reported STI symptoms, which is not a validated proxy for STI prevalence [82]. In addition, four of the 14 studies (29%) either did not discuss the legal status of sex work or did not make clear whether the police practices (e.g. condom confiscation or syringe confiscation) were prohibited in the location where the study was conducted [5,82,88,91]. Because policies and regulations regarding sex work and drug enforcement differ widely by location, all studies analyzing police practices should have a clear understanding and articulation of the study setting's legal environment in the methods. Finally, because directionality can be unclear, we excluded two papers [38,93] in which policing was considered the outcome variable rather than a structural factor shaping HIV risk outcomes. Addressing directionality can be difficult, however, and employing longitudinal studies in changing policing environments could prove invaluable.
Measurement
Few studies in this review focus on the measurement of police practices; for the most part, police practices were addressed by only one survey item. We found that most studies relied on crude measures of police behaviours, such as arrest for any offence, or ever having been arrested. First, the results could be biased by overestimating the effect on HIV or STI outcomes of policing activities that were unrelated to sex work and/or occurred years before the outcome was measured. Second, arrest alone is a poor measure of law enforcement that overlooks officers’ day-to-day discretionary enforcement activities other than arrest, as well as extra-legal practices towards sex workers. More focus is needed on measuring law enforcement practices, given the suggestion in the results of these few studies that activities carried out in the name of “public safety” could be an important HIV determinant, alongside more overt abuses of police power. With respect to extra-legal police practices, and mirroring the qualitative and grey literature, the broader context of sex workers’ experience of sexual violence includes a strong focus on policing abuses. This is important, but also draws attention to the lack of empirical evidence supporting important findings in the grey literature around other forms of police abuse and rights violations. For example, condom confiscation is reported in multiple settings [32–34], yet only one author, working in one setting, addressed this topic in two papers [70,84]. In line with the two studies in this review that specifically focused on police practices towards sex work [70,84], police measures to capture a range of police interactions that can be collapsed into a summary measure are needed in future studies. Precise measurement is also lacking with respect to STI infection as an outcome. Of the 10 papers measuring STI as an outcome, only half identify the type of STI infection [4,5,86,87,90], limiting the ability to explore associations between policing and individual STIs. Providing additional detail on specific STIs may also allow us to account for factors that may be correlated with particular STIs (e.g. race/ethnicity, age).
Gaps and opportunities
Despite our findings of a consistent association between police practices and STI/HIV-associated outcomes, important gaps exist. In particular, the need remains for more quantitative studies to provide a stronger evidence base from which to understand the significance of police practices as part of sex workers’ broader physical HIV risk environment. Specifically, only three of the 14 studies set out to explore the association between HIV outcomes and policing [70,84,86]. Instead, policing was typically considered a secondary exposure of interest. Policing practices as the main exposure of interest would give detail to the measurement of police behaviours, and provide an opportunity to establish more robust associations with HIV outcomes. It is of note that we identified only one study that sought to modify police behaviours [84]. Interventions that target police practices are needed, but prioritizing the intervention components that address policing is limited by the lack of empirical evidence about the epidemiology of police enforcement as a structural risk factor for HIV among sex workers.
This paper's data synthesis is guided by a conceptual model that specifically focuses on a legal determinants framework. Other frameworks, such as the Rhodes risk environment framework, may be better suited to capture the broader context and overlapping dimensions of the risk environment, which represents the space in which a variety of factors exogenous to the individual interact to increase the chances of HIV or STI infection [9]. Future research should look to dynamic conceptual frameworks that support a fuller exploration of the interactions between law enforcement and other features of the environment, including methods that account for these complexities. For example, it is notable that virtually all the papers identified in our search operationalize law enforcement towards sex workers as a single individual-level exposure, common across all individuals. Further, only one study considered police activity as a spatially explicit structural determinant of risk [51]. Related research exploring drug-related law enforcement [28,29,94,95] points to the importance of employing geographic methods to capture the complexities of law enforcement strategies, which may differ greatly across locations. Models with location-specific (or other structural) covariates would move beyond over-simplifying the operationalization of law enforcement as a structural determinant for HIV or STI infection in sex worker populations. Attention should be given to broader data sets that allow meaningful comparison of sex workers across a range of different structural determinants. This needs to be coupled with developments in analytical methods that can help disentangle the impact of such different risk factors on HIV or STI incidence. In particular, the development of hierarchical modelling approaches that take into account different aspects of the structural environment offer an important step forward [26].
Given the small group of papers, it is noteworthy that four of the 14 studies were conducted in Mexico [5,82,88,90] and two in Russia [4,83], meaning 43% of the studies are focused in only two regions. There is a need for future research to reflect a greater geographic diversity that is able to capture both consistencies and differences in policing approaches towards sex workers globally. A final gap in this group of studies is the exclusion of women transgender sex workers. Only one of the 14 studies considers “women” inclusive of both cis and transgender women, and none consider just trans women [51]. A frequent justification for not including transgender women within cis women sex worker studies is that their unique individual, interpersonal and structural vulnerabilities require independent research. However, transgender sex workers are recognized as sharing many of the same structural risks, including those concerning the police [26,96,97]. A large proportion of street-based FSWs are also drug users and face the dual risk of negative police interactions and arrest, as highlighted in three of the papers we included [5,88,90]. Police measures that account for the broader range of negative police interactions experienced by those sex workers who use drugs, and transgender women who sell sex are needed.
Limitations of study
The review's outcomes should be viewed in light of several limitations. Our inclusion criteria were set so as to produce a narrow critique of the quantitative literature around the role of micro-level policing practices as a structural cause or mitigating factor for risk, and the potential median of structural interventions to reduce risk. We acknowledge the larger body of qualitative and grey literature that supports the role of police abuse and enforcement practices in sex workers’ HIV risk environment. However, this review was concerned with critiquing the strength, generalizability and quality of the present quantitative evidence base. We also exclude studies that looked at the association between police practices and sex workers’ experience of violence. Acknowledging the extensive body of literature that supports the relationship [75], our focus was targeted to the influence policing practices have on more proximal HIV risk behaviours and HIV and STI outcomes among sex workers. Violence is more complicated in its association with HIV risk and has correspondingly been treated distinctly in the literature. The authors also recognize the broader legal and socio structural environment that can mitigate or potentiate sex workers’ risk, of which police practices are only one part. However, it is important to critique individual structural determinants and explore the evidence for their place as “key” determinants for sex workers’ HIV risk. We did not include male sex workers, due to their considerable diversity as a population and distinctiveness compared to FSWs [98]. We chose to include transgender women sex workers, not to undermine their more complex constellation of vulnerabilities, but to present women's experience of police as a structural risk factor. However, given that only one paper included transgender sex workers, the findings lack generalizability to this population. Finally, a meta-analysis was not undertaken due to the heterogeneity in risk factors explored by different studies. Despite these limitations, this review offers the most comprehensive analysis to date of policing practices as a mechanism for HIV outcomes among sex worker populations.
Conclusions
This review supports the broader literature's finding that there is a strong relationship between police practices and sex workers’ HIV risk behaviours and HIV or STI infection. However, the review exposes a relatively small pool of quantitative epidemiological evidence. Of particular significance is the finding that nearly all the papers identified in this review operationalize policing as an individual-level exposure and fail to take account of the complexities of the risk environment in which law enforcement occurs. A pressing need remains for more epidemiology to better measure and more broadly document both legal and extra-legal enforcement practices as mechanisms through which sex workers’ HIV risk is mediated. The science community should work in partnership with sex work communities and key stakeholders (e.g. police, legal service providers, brothel managers) to build evidence-based evaluations that are grounded in sex workers’ experiences with police. However, it is vital to the success of such interventions that researchers continue to work across varied settings to achieve a more nuanced measurement of the role of police practices as a downstream legal determinant of sex workers’ HIV risk environment.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This work has been supported by the National institutes of Drug Abuse (R01DA038499) and Johns Hopkins University Hopkins Population Center (R24HD042854). Dr. Sherman was partially supported by Johns Hopkins University Center for AIDS Research (P30AI094189).
Competing interests
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
KF conceptualized the study, led the systematic review process and full text reviews and wrote the article. BS developed and implemented the search strategy and led the title, abstract review and data abstraction processes, assisted by KT. BS also drafted sections of the article. SS assisted with development of the search protocol and provided critical review of this article. All authors have read and approved the final version.
References
- 1.Baral SD, Poteat T, Strömdahl S, Wirtz AL, Guadamuz TE, Beyrer C. Worldwide burden of HIV in transgender women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(3):214–22. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70315-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Baral S, Beyrer C, Muessig K, Poteat T, Wirtz AL, Decker MR, et al. Burden of HIV among female sex workers in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12(7):538–49. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70066-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Uusküla A, Fischer K, Raudne R, Kilgi H, Krylov R, Salminen M, et al. A study on HIV and hepatitis C virus among commercial sex workers in Tallinn. Sex Transm Infect. 2008;84(3):189–91. doi: 10.1136/sti.2007.027664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Decker MR, Wirtz AL, Baral SD, Peryshkina A, Mogilnyi V, Weber RA, et al. Injection drug use, sexual risk, violence and STI/HIV among Moscow female sex workers. Sex Transm Infect. 2012;88(4):278–83. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Strathdee SA, Abramovitz D, Lozada R, Martinez G, Rangel MG, Vera A, et al. Reductions in HIV/STI incidence and sharing of injection equipment among female sex workers who inject drugs: results from a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):65812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kral AH, Bluthenthal RN, Lorvick J, Gee L, Bacchetti P, Edlin BR. Sexual transmission of HIV-1 among injection drug users in San Francisco, USA: risk-factor analysis. Lancet. 2001;357(9266):1397–401. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04562-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2012. Prevention and treatment of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections for sex workers in low-and middle-income countries: recommendations for a public health approach. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rhodes T. Risk environments and drug harms: a social science for harm reduction approach. Int J Drug Policy. 2009;20(3):193–201. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2008.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rhodes T, Singer M, Bourgois P, Friedman SR, Strathdee SA. The social structural production of HIV risk among injecting drug users. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(5):1026–44. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Karpati A, Galea S, Awerbuch T, Levins R. Variability and vulnerability at the ecological level: implications for understanding the social determinants of health. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(11):1768–72. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.11.1768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Galea S, Vlahov D. Social determinants and the health of drug users: socioeconomic status, homelessness, and incarceration. Public Health Rep. 2002;117(Suppl 1):S135–45. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Beeker C, Guenther-Grey C, Raj A. Community empowerment paradigm drift and the primary prevention of HIV/AIDS. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46(7):831–42. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00208-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Parker RG, Easton D, Klein CH. Structural barriers and facilitators in HIV prevention: a review of international research. AIDS. 2000;14(Suppl 1):S22–32. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200006001-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kerrigan D, Moreno L, Rosario S, Gomez B, Jerez H, Barrington C, et al. Environmental-structural interventions to reduce HIV/STI risk among female sex workers in the Dominican Republic. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(1):120–5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.042200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shannon K, Goldenberg SM, Deering KN, Strathdee SA. HIV infection among female sex workers in concentrated and high prevalence epidemics: why a structural determinants framework is needed. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2014;9(2):174–82. doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rhodes T. The ‘risk environment’: a framework for understanding and reducing drug-related harm. Int J Drug Policy. 2002;13(2):85–94. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rhodes T, Wagner K, Strathdee SA, Shannon K, Davidson P, Bourgois P. Structural violence and structural vulnerability within the risk environment: theoretical and methodological perspectives for a social epidemiology of HIV risk among injection drug users and sex workers. In: O'Campo P, Dunn JR, editors. Rethinking social epidemiology. Netherlands: Springer; 2012. pp. 205–30. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Beyrer C, Crago AL, Bekker LG, Butler J, Shannon K, Kerrigan D, et al. An action agenda for HIV and sex workers. Lancet. 2015;385(9964):287–301. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60933-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Burris S, Blankenship KM, Donoghoe M, Sherman S, Vernick JS, Case P, et al. Addressing the “risk environment” for injection drug users: the mysterious case of the missing cop. Milbank Q. 2004;82(1):125–56. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00304.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Richter ML, Chersich MF, Scorgie F, Luchters S, Temmerman M, Steen R. Sex work and the 2010 FIFA World Cup: time for public health imperatives to prevail. Glob Health. 2010;6:1. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-6-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lutnick A, Cohan D. Criminalization, legalization or decriminalization of sex work: what female sex workers say in San Francisco, USA. Reprod Health Matters. 2009;17(34):38–46. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(09)34469-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kismodi E, Cottingham J, Gruskin S, Miller AM. Advancing sexual health through human rights: the role of the law. Glob Public Health. 2015;10(2):252–67. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2014.986175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.UNAIDS. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2010. Making the law work for the HIV response: a snapshot of selected laws that support or block universal access to HIV prevention, treatment, care and support. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Open Society Foundation. New York, USA: Open Society Foundation; 2012. Laws and policies affecting sex work – a reference brief. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sukthankar A. Sex work, HIV and the law. New York: Global Commission on HIV and the Law Working Paper Global Commission on HIV and the Law; 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shannon K, Strathdee SA, Goldenberg SM, Duff P, Mwangi P, Rusakova M, et al. Global epidemiology of HIV among female sex workers: influence of structural determinants. Lancet. 2015;385(9962):55–71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60931-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Friedman SR, Barbara T, Brady JE, West BS, Pouget ER, Williams LD, et al. Income inequality, drug-related arrests, and the health of people who inject drugs: reflections on seventeen years of research. Int J Drug Policy. 2016. [in press] doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Friedman SR, Cooper HL, Tempalski B, Keem M, Friedman R, Flom PL, et al. Relationships of deterrence and law enforcement to drug-related harms among drug injectors in US metropolitan areas. AIDS. 2006;20(1):93–9. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000196176.65551.a3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cooper HL, Bossak B, Tempalski B, Des Jarlais DC, Friedman SR. Geographic approaches to quantifying the risk environment: a focus on syringe exchange program site access and drug-related law enforcement activities. Int J Drug Policy. 2009;20(3):217. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2008.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Strathdee SA, Beletsky L, Kerr T. HIV, drugs and the legal environment. Int J Drug Policy. 2015;26(Suppl 1):S27–32. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bardach E. The implementation game: what happens after a bill becomes a law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1977. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Open Society Foundation. New York, USA: Criminalizing Condoms; 2011. Sexual health and rights project of the Open Society Foundations. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Human Rights Watch. New York, USA: Human Rights Watch; 2012. Sex workers at risk, condoms as evidence of prostitution in four US cities. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Human Rights Watch. New York, USA: Human Rights Watch; 2013. In harm's way – state response to sex workers, drug users, and HIV in New Orleans. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ghimire L, Smith WC, van Teijlingen ER, Dahal R, Luitel NP. Reasons for non- use of condoms and self- efficacy among female sex workers: a qualitative study in Nepal. BMC Womens Health. 2011;11:42. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-11-42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Goldenberg SM, Rangel G, Vera A, Patterson TL, Abramovitz D, Silverman JG, et al. Exploring the impact of underage sex work among female sex workers in two Mexico-US border cities. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(4):969–81. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-0063-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Beletsky L, Lozada R, Gaines T, Abramovitz D, Staines H, Vera A, et al. Syringe confiscation as an HIV risk factor: the public health implications of arbitrary policing in Tijuana and Ciudad Juarez, Mexico. J Urban Health. 2013;90(2):284–98. doi: 10.1007/s11524-012-9741-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Beletsky L, Martinez G, Gaines T, Nguyen L, Lozada R, Rangel G, et al. Mexico's northern border conflict: collateral damage to health and human rights of vulnerable groups. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2012;31(5):403–10. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892012000500008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Goldenberg S, Engstrom D, Rolon ML, Silverman JG, Strathdee SA. Sex workers perspectives on strategies to reduce sexual exploitation and HIV risk: a qualitative study in Tijuana, Mexico. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e72982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Robertson AM, Ojeda VD, Nguyen L, Lozada R, Martinez GA, Strathdee SA, et al. Reducing harm from HIV/AIDS misconceptions among female sex workers in Tijuana and Ciudad Juarez, Mexico: a cross sectional analysis. Harm Reduct J. 2012;9:35. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-9-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ditmore M. When sex work and drug use overlap: considerations for advocacy and practice. London, UK: Harm Reduction International; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Rusakova M, Rakhmetova A, Strathdee SA. Why are sex workers who use substances at risk for HIV? Lancet. 2015;385(9964):211–2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61042-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sanders T. The risks of street prostitution: punters, police and protesters. Urban Studies. 2004;41(9):1703–17. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Saunders P, Kirby J. Move along: community-based research into the policing of sex work in Washington, DC. Soc Justice. 2010;37(1):107–27. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Williams L. Sex in the city why and how street workers select their locations for business. J Contemp Ethnogr. 2014;43(6):659–94. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Day SE, Ward H. British policy makes sex workers vulnerable. BMJ. 2007;334(7586):187. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39104.638785.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Blankenship KM, Koester S. Criminal law, policing policy, and HIV risk in female street sex workers and injection drug users. J Law Med Ethics. 2002;30(4):548–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2002.tb00425.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lowman J. Violence and the outlaw status of (street) prostitution in Canada. Violence Against Women. 2000;6(9):987–1011. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ross B. Sex and (evacuation from) the city: the moral and legal regulation of sex workers in Vancouver's West End, 1975–1985. Sexualities. 2010;13(2):197–218. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Shannon K, Kerr T, Allinott S, Chettiar J, Shoveller J, Tyndall MW. Social and structural violence and power relations in mitigating HIV risk of drug-using women in survival sex work. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(4):911–21. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Shannon K, Strathdee SA, Shoveller J, Rusch M, Kerr T, Tyndall MW. Structural and environmental barriers to condom use negotiation with clients among female sex workers: implications for HIV-prevention strategies and policy. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(4):659–65. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.129858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Decker MR, Crago AL, Chu SK, Sherman SG, Seshu MS, Buthelezi K, et al. Human rights violations against sex workers: burden and effect on HIV. Lancet. 2015;385(9963):186–99. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60800-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Muula A, Twizelimana D. HIV and AIDS risk perception among sex workers in semi-urban Blantyre, Malawi. Tanzania J Health Res. 2015;17(3):1–7. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Fick N. Sex workers speak out: policing and the sex industry. SA Crime Quarterly. 2006;(15):13–18. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Rhodes T, Simic M, Baros S, Platt L, Zikic B. Police violence and sexual risk among female and transvestite sex workers in Serbia: qualitative study. BMJ. 2008;337:a811. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Simic M, Rhodes T. Violence, dignity and HIV vulnerability: street sex work in Serbia. Sociol Health Illn. 2009;31(1):1–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01112.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Crago A. , USA: Sex Workers’ Rights Advocacy Network; 2009. Arrest the violence: human rights abuses against sex workers in central and eastern Europe and central Asia. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Mayhew S, Collumbien M, Qureshi A, Platt L, Rafiq N, Faisel A, et al. Protecting the unprotected: mixed-method research on drug use, sex work and rights in Pakistan's fight against HIV/AIDS. Sex Transm Infect. 2009;85:ii31–6. doi: 10.1136/sti.2008.033670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Decker MR, Pearson E, Illangasekare SL, Clark E, Sherman SG. Violence against women in sex work and HIV risk implications differ qualitatively by perpetrator. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:876. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Aral SO, St Lawrence JS, Dyatlov R, Kozlov A. Commercial sex work, drug use, and sexually transmitted infections in St. Petersburg, Russia. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(10):2181–90. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Aral SO, St Lawrence JS, Tikhonova L, Safarova E, Parker KA, Shakarishvili A, et al. The social organization of commercial sex work in Moscow, Russia. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30(1):39–45. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200301000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Shannon K, Csete J. Violence, condom negotiation, and HIV/STI risk among sex workers. JAMA. 2010;304(5):573–4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Biradavolu MR, Burris S, George A, Jena A, Blankenship KM. Can sex workers regulate police? Learning from an HIV prevention project for sex workers in southern India. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(8):1541–7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Williamson C, Baker L, Jenkins M, Cluse-Tolar T. Police-prostitute interactions: sometimes discretion, sometimes misconduct. J Progressive Human Services. 2007;18(2):15–37. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Okal J, Chersich MF, Tsui S, Sutherland E, Temmerman M, Luchters S. Sexual and physical violence against female sex workers in Kenya: a qualitative enquiry. AIDS Care. 2011;23(5):612–8. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2010.525605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Sherman SG, Footer K, Illangasekare S, Clark E, Pearson E, Decker MR. What makes you think you have special privileges because you are a police officer?” A qualitative exploration of police's role in the risk environment of female sex workers. AIDS Care. 2015;27(4):473–80. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2014.970504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Wong WC, Holroyd E, Bingham A. Stigma and sex work from the perspective of female sex workers in Hong Kong. Sociol Health Illn. 2011;33(1):50–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01276.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Nichols A. Dance ponnaya, dance! police abuses against transgender sex workers in Sri Lanka. Fem Criminol. 2010;5(2):195–222. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ratinthorn A, Meleis A, Sindhu S. Trapped in circle of threats: violence against sex workers in Thailand. Health Care Women Int. 2009;30(3):249–69. doi: 10.1080/07399330902733281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Erausquin JT, Reed E, Blankenship KM. Police-related experiences and HIV risk among female sex workers in Andhra Pradesh, India. J Infect Dis. 2011;204(Suppl 5):S1223–8. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Popoola BI. Occupational hazards and coping strategies of sex workers in southwestern Nigeria. Health Care Women Int. 2013;34(2):139–49. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2011.646366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Katsulis Y, Lopez V, Durfee A, Robillard A. Female sex workers and the social context of workplace violence in Tijuana, Mexico. Med Anthropol Q. 2010;24(3):344–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1387.2010.01108.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Lim S, Peitzmeier S, Cange C, Papworth E, LeBreton M, Tamoufe U, et al. Violence against female sex workers in Cameroon: accounts of violence, harm reduction, and potential solutions. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;68:S241–7. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Human Rights Watch. New York, USA: Human Rights Watch; 2010. Off the streets arbitrary detention and other abuses against sex workers in Cambodia. [Google Scholar]
- 75.Deering KN, Amin A, Shoveller J, Nesbitt A, Garcia-Moreno C, Duff P, et al. A systematic review of the correlates of violence against sex workers. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(5):e42–54. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Tenni B, Carpenter J, Thomson N. Arresting HIV: fostering partnerships between sex workers and police to reduce HIV risk and promote professionalization within policing Institutions: a realist review. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):0134900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Elmagarmid A, Fedorowicz Z, Hammady H, Ilyas I, Khabsa M, Ouzzani M. In: Evidence-informed public health: opportunities and challenges. Hyderabad, India: Wiley; 2014. Rayyan: a systematic reviews web app for exploring and filtering searches for eligible studies for Cochrane Reviews. Abstracts of the 2nd Cochrane Colloquium; 21–26 September. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Sanderson S, Tatt ID, Higgins JP. Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36(3):666–76. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Zeng X, Zhang Y, Kwong JS, Zhang C, Li S, Sun F, et al. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. J Evid-Based Med. 2015;8(1):2–10. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.National Heart, Lung, Blood Institute, National Institute of Health. Quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies [Internet] 2014. [updated March 2014]; [cited 2016 Apr 12]. Available from: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-pro/guidelines/in-develop/cardiovascular-risk-reduction/tools/cohort.
- 81.National Heart, Lung, Blood Institute, National Institute of Health. Quality Assessment of Controlled Intervention Studies. 2014. [updated March 2014–March 16, 2016]; [cited 2016 Apr 12]. Available from: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-pro/guidelines/in-develop/cardiovascular-risk-reduction/tools/rct.
- 82.Chen NE, Strathdee SA, Uribe-Salas FJ, Patterson TL, Rangel MG, Rosen P, et al. Correlates of STI symptoms among female sex workers with truck driver clients in two Mexican border towns. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1000. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Decker MR, Wirtz AL, Moguilnyi V, Peryshkina A, Ostrovskaya M, Nikita M, et al. Female sex workers in three cities in Russia: HIV prevalence, risk factors and experience with targeted HIV prevention. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(3):562–72. doi: 10.1007/s10461-013-0577-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Erausquin J, Reed E, Blankenship KM. Change over time in police interactions and HIV risk behavior among female sex workers in Andhra Pradesh, India. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(6):1108–15. doi: 10.1007/s10461-014-0926-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Erickson M, Goldenberg SM, Ajok M, Muldoon KA, Muzaaya G, Shannon K. Structural determinants of dual contraceptive use among female sex workers in Gulu, northern Uganda. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(1):91–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Gertler PJ, Shah M. Sex work and infection: what's law enforcement got to do with it? J Law Econ. 2011;54(4):811–40. [Google Scholar]
- 87.Pando MA, Coloccini RS, Reynaga E, Rodriguez Fermepin M, Gallo Vaulet L, Kochel TJ, et al. Violence as a barrier for HIV prevention among female sex workers in Argentina. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Pitpitan EV, Patterson TL, Abramovitz D, Vera A, Martinez G, Staines H, et al. Policing behaviors, safe injection self-efficacy, and intervening on injection risks: moderated mediation results from a randomized trial. Health Psychol. 2015;35(1):87–91. doi: 10.1037/hea0000241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Qiao S, Li X, Zhang C, Zhou Y, Shen Z, Tang Z, et al. Psychological fears among low-paid female sex workers in southwest China and their implications for HIV prevention. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e111012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Strathdee SA, Lozada R, Martinez G, Vera A, Rusch M, Nguyen L, et al. Social and structural factors associated with HIV infection among female sex workers who inject drugs in the Mexico-US border region. PLoS One. 2011;6(4):e19048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Zhang C, Li X, Hong Y, Zhou Y, Liu W, Stanton B. Unprotected sex with their clients among low-paying female sex workers in southwest China. AIDS Care. 2013;25(4):503–6. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2012.726345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Institute of Development Studies. Map of sex work law. Sexuality Power and Law Programme. [cited 2015 Dec 13]. Available from: http://spl.ids.ac.uk/sexworklaw.
- 93.Odinokova V, Rusakova M, Urada LA, Silverman JG, Raj A. Police sexual coercion and its association with risky sex work and substance use behaviors among female sex workers in St. Petersburg and Orenburg, Russia. Int J Drug Policy. 2014;25(1):96–104. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Cooper HL, Des Jarlais DC, Tempalski B, Bossak BH, Ross Z, Friedman SR. Drug-related arrest rates and spatial access to syringe exchange programs in New York City health districts: combined effects on the risk of injection-related infections among injectors. Health Place. 2012;18(2):218–28. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Friedman SR, Lieb MS, Tempalski B, Cooper MH, Keem MM, Friedman MR, et al. HIV among injection drug users in large US metropolitan areas, 1998. J Urban Health. 2005;82(3):434–45. doi: 10.1093/jurban/jti088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Nemoto T, Operario D, Keatley J, Han L, Soma T. HIV risk behaviors among male-to-female transgender persons of color in San Francisco. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(7):1193–9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.7.1193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Poteat T, Wirtz AL, Radix A, Borquez A, Silva-Santisteban A, Deutsch MB, et al. HIV risk and preventive interventions in transgender women sex workers. Lancet. 2015;385(9964):274–86. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60833-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Baral SD, Friedman MR, Geibel S, Rebe K, Bozhinov B, Diouf D, et al. Male sex workers: practices, contexts, and vulnerabilities for HIV acquisition and transmission. Lancet. 2015;385(9964):260–73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60801-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


