Abstract
The English National Service Framework (NSF) for Older People conforms to the emerging pattern of NSFs as hybrids of policy and evidence, drafted and edited within the Department of Health, albeit with external advisory input. Physicians welcome its much-needed focus on the needs of older people, but its dynamic differs from that underlying the evolution of comprehensive services to date, raising concerns that its declared objectives may be unrealised or perversely interpreted. This applies to the first three (of eight) 'standards’ currently being applied: rooting out ageism, the single assessment process and intermediate care. With each, there are problems of concept, operational feasibility, expertise and accountability for standards. Conversely, the standards for subspecialty service models (stroke, falls, mental health) are more significantly underpinned by evidence and operational experience. Success overall will depend on more clearly defined resource flow and accountability, career recruitment, research direction and engagement with specialist physicians than are immediately apparent in the document.
Keywords: ageing, assessment falls, government health policy, health promotion, intermediate care, mental health, older people, service standards, stroke
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (122.0 KB).