Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1992 Jul 15;89(14):6502–6505. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.14.6502

Induced polypeptides associated with filarial worm refractoriness in Aedes aegypti.

A R Wattam 1, B M Christensen 1
PMCID: PMC49529  PMID: 1631149

Abstract

Brugia malayi and Wuchereria bancrofti are mosquito-borne parasitic nematodes responsible for lymphatic filariasis in approximately 90 million people. The genetic control of the susceptibility of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes to B. malayi was well defined 30 years ago, but no data have since been provided regarding the gene products responsible for susceptibility or refractoriness or both. We addressed this problem by assessing polypeptide synthesis in thoracic tissue, the developmental site of this parasite, in susceptible and refractory strains of A. aegypti. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of radiolabeled polypeptides synthesized in vivo were compared between (i) established susceptible and refractory strains and (ii) a refractory strain newly isolated from the established susceptible strain. Six polypeptide differences recognized by SDS/PAGE and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis were seen only in the refractory strains after they took a blood meal. A seventh polypeptide was present in those refractory mosquitoes that had ingested sucrose but increased in intensity after blood-feeding. The presence of parasites in the blood meal was not necessary to stimulate the synthesis of these polypeptides. These refractory strain-associated molecules may mediate genetically determined variation in susceptibility.

Full text

PDF
6502

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beerntsen B. T., Christensen B. M. Dirofilaria immitis: effect on hemolymph polypeptide synthesis in Aedes aegypti during melanotic encapsulation reactions against microfilariae. Exp Parasitol. 1990 Nov;71(4):406–414. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(90)90066-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Collins F. H., Sakai R. K., Vernick K. D., Paskewitz S., Seeley D. C., Miller L. H., Collins W. E., Campbell C. C., Gwadz R. W. Genetic selection of a Plasmodium-refractory strain of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Science. 1986 Oct 31;234(4776):607–610. doi: 10.1126/science.3532325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hockmeyer W. T., Schiefer B. A., Redington B. C., Eldridge B. F. Brugia pahangi: effects upon the flight capability of Aedes aegypti. Exp Parasitol. 1975 Aug;38(1):1–5. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(75)90031-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MACDONALD W. W. A PRELIMINARY CROSS-OVER VALUE BETWEEN THE GENE FM (FILARIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY, BRUGIA MALAYI) AND THE SEX LOCUS IN AEDES AEGYPTI. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1963 Dec;57:461–465. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1963.11686201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MACDONALD W. W., RAMACHANDRAN C. P. THE INFLUENCE OF THE GENE FM (FILARIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY, BRUGIA MALAYI) ON THE SUSCEPTIBILITY OF AEDES AEGYPTI TO SEVEN STRAINS OF BRUGIA, WUCHERERIA AND DIROFILARIA. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1965 Mar;59:64–73. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1965.11686284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. MACDONALD W. W., SHEPPARD P. M. CROSS-OVER VALUES IN THE SEX CHROMOSOMES OF THE MOSQUITO AEDES AEGYPTI AND EVIDENCE OF THE PRESENCE OF INVERSIONS. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1965 Mar;59:74–87. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1965.11686285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McGreevy P. B., McClelland G. A., Lavoipierre M. M. Inheritance of susceptibility to Dirofilaria immitis infection in Aedes aegypti. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1974 Mar;68(1):97–109. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1974.11686929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. O'Farrell P. H. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J Biol Chem. 1975 May 25;250(10):4007–4021. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ramachandran C. P. Biological aspects in the transmission of Brugia malayi by Aedes aegypti in the laboratory. J Med Entomol. 1966 Dec;3(3):239–252. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/3.3-4.239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. SCHACHER J. F. Morphology of the microfilaria of Brugia pahangi and of the larval stages in the mosquito. J Parasitol. 1962 Oct;48:679–692. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zielke E. Untersuchungen zur Vererbung der Empfänglichkeit gegenüber der Hundefilar ie Dirofilaria immitis bei Culex pipiens fatigans und Aedes aegypti. Z Tropenmed Parasitol. 1973 Mar;24(1):36–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES