Editor – We read with keen interest, the very timely study of O'Connor et al (Clin Med Feb 2011 pp 40–3). It was reassuring to note the significant reduction in dependency, dependency costs and improvement in functional ability as measured using the median Barthel index in stroke patients who have undergone goal-oriented multidisciplinary inpatient neurological rehabilitation. This is pertinent in the current financial climate where commissioning of healthcare is about to be radically transformed from primary care trusts to GP consortia with no robust evidence, including pilot study, to back such a monumental change within the NHS.
Although the study did not mention the formal follow-up of the cohort of stroke patients in a dedicated outpatient clinic and community therapy team after inpatient rehabilitation, we wonder if the team has any data regarding further improvement in physical ability or further reduction in dependency and dependency costs subsequent to follow-up in a dedicated outpatient clinic in conjunction with outpatient or community therapy input.
It is possible that any additional data to support further gains after inpatient rehabilitation, either by a dedicated community team led by rehabilitation medicine physicians or by general practitioners with an interest in stroke or neurological disability, would in no small measure help drive home the message of the beneficial impact of both inpatient and outpatient input in stroke patients by all and sundry, including commisioners. The potential savings on scanty resources and the improvement of the quality of life of stroke patients cannot be overemphasised.