Skip to main content
Clinical Medicine logoLink to Clinical Medicine
. 2004 May 1;4(3):269–276. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.4-3-269

Accountability, trust and informed consent in medical practice and research

Onora O'Neill 1
PMCID: PMC4953592  PMID: 15244364

Abstract

During the last 25 years public policy in the UK has aimed to replace ‘club’ cultures and their supposedly suspect reliance on trust between professionals and public with a new public culture based on accountability and ‘transparency’. These transformations have changed both clinical practice and public health policy in deep ways. Are the new conceptions of accountability adequate? Are obligations to be ‘transparent’ any more than requirements to disclose information which overlook the need for genuine communication? Can demands for ever fuller informed consent improve accountability to individual patients and research subjects? Could we devise more intelligent conceptions of accountability that support more intelligent placing and refusal of trust? What might intelligent conceptions of accountability suggest about proper clinical practice, public health medicine and professional responsibilities?

Keywords: accountability, bioethics, informed consent, medical ethics, patient autonomy, professionalism, public health, research ethics, transparency, trust

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (155.6 KB).


Articles from Clinical Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal College of Physicians

RESOURCES