Skip to main content
Clinical Medicine logoLink to Clinical Medicine
. 2013 Oct;13(5):511–513. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.13-5-511

Acute infections in intravenous drug users

Thomas W Lavender 1,, Brendan McCarron 1
PMCID: PMC4953807  PMID: 24115713

Key points

Intravenous drug users (IDUs) are vulnerable to a wide range of potentially life-threatening infections, including rare infections such as wound botulism and cutaneous anthrax

All active and previous IDUs should be offered blood-borne virus screening when in contact with healthcare services

In IDUs with skin and soft-tissue infections, thorough assessment of the site and severity is key

Careful assessment for endocarditis, including echocardiography, is required in IDUs presenting with bloodstream infections, septic pulmonary emboli and infected deep venous thromboses

IDUs are at increased risk of pulmonary infection, and septic pulmonary emboli are commonly associated with right-sided endocarditis, infected deep venous thromboses and bloodstream infection

Introduction

Mortality in injecting drug users (IDUs) is up to 22 times higher than for the age-adjusted population.1 Despite increased provision of needle and syringe programmes, reduced needle and syringe sharing, and higher uptake of hepatitis B (HBV) vaccination,2 IDUs remain vulnerable to a range of infections with potentially life-threatening complications. In this paper, we describe the epidemiology, presentation, diagnosis and management of infections in IDUs who may present to acute physicians and the management of drug dependency on acute medical wards.

HIV and hepatitis B and C

Almost half of IDUs are positive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody, and 90% of newly diagnosed HCV infections in the UK occur in IDUs. Conversely, <1% of IDUs are positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen, accounting for 4.4% of all reported cases of HBV, which reflects increased uptake of HBV vaccination in IDUs from 37% in 2001 to 76% in 2011. The prevalence of human immunodeficieny virus (HIV) in IDUs in the UK is about 1% – lower than in many other European countries.2 Based on the assumption that all IDUs, particularly those presenting with evidence of immunosuppression or hepatitis, should be screened for blood-borne viruses, we do not discuss these conditions further in this paper.

Skin and soft-tissue infections

In 2009, 28% of IDUs reported an injection-site infection,3 with complications of such infections ranging from uncomplicated cellulitis and localised abscesses to life-threatening necrotising fasciitis and severe sepsis. Staphylococcus aureus and Group A streptococci (GAS) account for most isolated organisms, although Gram-negative and polymicrobial infections -frequently occur; 6.9% of methicillin–sensitive S aureus (MSSA) bacteraemia, 3.1% of methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia and one in five severe GAS infections are associated with IDUs.3–5 Subcutaneous or intramuscular injection (‘skin popping’) is a major risk factor for abscess formation.6

In IDUs presenting with skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs), assessment of the site and severity of infection is key. Early ultrasound imaging is useful to confirm the presence of an abscess requiring surgical intervention or an infected iliofemoral venous thrombosis, which is commonly associated with groin infection.7,8 Blood cultures, pus swabs (when clinically indicated) and a chest X-ray should be taken for all patients, who should also be assessed thoroughly for infective endocarditis, with a low threshold for performing an echo-cardiogram. Computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be necessary in cases of suspected pyomyositis or osteomyelitis.

Antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated cellulitis should cover S aureus and strep-tococci and MRSA should be covered if there is evidence of previous infection or colonisation. First choice therapy is intravenous (IV) flucloxacillin at a dose of 1–2 g administered every 6 hours; in clinically stable patients with penicillin allergy or difficult intravenous access, oral clindamycin is a useful alternative. For patients with suspected necrotising fasciitis, abscess or pyomyositis, initial therapy should also cover Gram-negative and anaerobic organisms, and urgent surgical input should be sought.9 Depending on the extent and complexity of the SSTI, the length of therapy required may range from 10 days to 6 weeks. All patients with bacteraemia caused by S aureus should receive at least 2 weeks of intravenous therapy and undergo an echocardiogram.10

Pulmonary infections

Intravenous drug users have a 10-fold increased risk of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), including aspiration pneumonia, and a greater incidence of pulmonary tuberculosis compared with the general population. This relates to smoking, alcohol abuse, poor nutrition and homelessness. Organisms commonly causing CAP in this group include Streptococcus pneumoniae, S aureus, Haemophilus influenzae and Klebsiella pneumoniae.11,12

Septic pulmonary emboli can seed from injection-site infections and tricuspid valve endocarditis and usually present with high fever and symptoms suggestive of pulmonary emboli.11 Lung abscesses result typically from aspiration, frequently due to K pneumoniae13 or septic emboli. Although chest X-ray is sufficient to demonstrate the pulmonary infection in most cases, CT can be useful to confirm cavitation and the distribution of infection and to exclude pulmonary embolus.

Choice of antibiotic therapy is dependent on the organism isolated from blood or sputum and may need to be given for a prolonged period – 4 weeks or more depending on clinical progress. Empirical treatment for lung abscesses should cover S aureus, Gram-negative bacteria and anaerobes.

Infective endocarditis

The incidence of infective endocarditis (IE) is significantly elevated in IDUs. Injected particulate matter causes endothelial damage, which is followed by infection from high injected bacterial loads associated with relative immune suppression.14 Most cases of right-sided IE, particularly tricuspid-valve IE, occur in IDUs. However, right- and left-sided infections occur with equal incidence in IDUs.15 Staphylococcus aureus accounts for up to three-quarters of cases, followed by streptococci and, less commonly, Gram-negative bacilli and fungi.16 Septic emboli are common in IE caused by S aureus and can involve the lungs (right-sided IE) and the kidney, brain and bone (left-sided IE).16,17

The choice and duration of antibiotic therapy are as for non-IDUs with IE. Although there are obvious dangers in discharging IDUs to receive outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT), appropriately selected, counselled and monitored patients can be treated safely and successfully and may respond better in the community than during a long -inpatient stay.18 Short-course treatment of 2–4 weeks can be considered for right-sided IE due to MSSA,19 and combination oral therapy can be considered in extreme cases where intravenous access is not possible or the patient is unwilling to stay in hospital;20 such cases should be discussed with an infection expert. Surgery for IE is not generally advisable due to the potential for prosthetic valve infection, although some authors support implantation of bioprosthetic valves, with 41% survival at 10 years reported.21

Anthrax

Prior to 2009, only one case of anthrax had ever been reported in a heroin user worldwide. In 2009–10, 52 confirmed cases were reported; these were predominantly in injecting heroin users in Scotland, who were all thought to have used the same contaminated batch of heroin: 93% presented with SSTIs and 17 died.3,22 No cases were reported in the UK in 2011, although cases re-emerged in 2012, with 12 reported across northern Europe.23

Bacillus anthracis causes anthrax when spores, which can survive in the environment for decades, enter the body through abrasions or injection, inhalation or ingestion. Cutaneous disease presents 5–7 days after inoculation as a small pruritic papule, which enlarges, blisters and ulcerates to leave a painless necrotic ulcer with a black eschar. The word anthrax, from the Greek for coal, refers to the typical black eschar, although this was present in only one patient in the 2009–10 outbreak.22,24 Extensive oedema in the surrounding tissues, regional lymphadenopathy and lymphangitis develop.24 Mortality is <1% with antibiotic therapy, typically ciprofloxacin or doxycycline, and 20% without.

Inhalational anthrax results in haemorrhagic mediastinitis when inhaled spores multiply in mediastinal lymph nodes.25 Prodromal symptoms include fever, cough and dyspnoea, which are followed by a rapidly fulminant bacteraemic phase leading to respiratory failure, shock and death within 5 days. Antibiotic therapy and anthrax antiserum can be successful if initiated during the prodromal phase, although the fulminant phase is almost always fatal.26 Chest radiography is typically abnormal; widening of the mediastinum secondary to mediastinitis is classic, although pleural effusions, hilar abnormalities, pulmonary infiltrates and consolidation also occur.26

Clostridial infections

Wound botulism occurs when wounds, including injecting sites, are infected with Clostridium botulinum. Prior to 2000, no cases had been reported in the UK, but 163 cases were reported in IDUs from 2000 to 2010, mostly in heroin users injecting into muscle or ‘skin popping’.3,27 Botulinum toxin, one of the most potent toxins known, binds irreversibly to presynaptic membranes in the neuromuscular junction. This blocks acetylcholine release, which typically results in a descending symmetrical flaccid paralysis, with cranial nerve palsies, dysphagia and dysarthria. Consciousness is maintained and fever typically is absent. Diagnosis is clinical, with confirmation from serological and neurophysiological studies. Treatment includes early administration of antitoxin, wound debridement and antibiotics, as well as supportive care.27

An outbreak of Clostridium novyi infection in Scotland in 2000 again resulted from a large batch of contaminated heroin; 60 cases were identified, most injecting heroin extravascularly. Cases were characterised by multi-organ failure with moderate to severe inflammation at or near an injecting site and marked leucocytosis (median white cell count 60 × 109/l). Mortality was 87% in confirmed cases.3,28

Only two cases of tetanus were reported in IDUs in England and Wales between 1984 and 2000. However, an outbreak of 25 cases occurred among IDUs in the UK between 2003 and 2004. Eight cases were reported in 2005–2009 and one in 2010.3

Managing IDUs on medical wards

Intravenous drug users can be challenging patients to manage on medical wards, with aggressive behaviour, illicit drug use while in hospital and early self-discharge commonly encountered. Good management requires a frank and non-judgemental approach, and clear behavioural boundaries should be outlined, including explanations of the consequences of abusing staff, demanding medications other than those prescribed and obstructing the continuity of care.29 Opiates and other drugs that could be misused, including intravenous cyclizine,30 should be prescribed by a single sufficiently experienced prescriber.

Identification of IDUs is crucial – both to determine clinical risk and to minimise the risk of unexpected withdrawal. An accurate drug history, including route of administration, should be completed for all patients on admission, acknowledging that this may need to be repeated until an accurate picture is gained. All IDUs should be asked about the use of other substances, especially alcohol and benzodiazepines. For patients on opioid maintenance therapy, the dose and timing of the last dose should be confirmed with the dispensing centre at the first opportunity.

Although requests for analgesia are often interpreted by healthcare staff as drug-seeking behaviour, withdrawal symptoms and pain must be adequately treated. If evidence indicates opiate withdrawal, 10–20 mg of methadone can be given safely until the regular prescribed dose is confirmed. For acute pain management, non-opioid analgesia, including paracetamol and non–steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, should be optimised, with short-acting opioids added if required. IDUs typically require higher than usual doses of opioid analgesics, which should subsequently be converted to regularly dosed slow-release -preparations while long-acting methadone is continued to relieve symptoms of -withdrawal.29 When considering the use of adjunctive rifampicin in infections caused by S aureus, physicians should be aware that the dose of methadone may need to be increased; this requires close monitoring to avoid methadone withdrawal.31

Conclusions

Although infections in IDUs can be challenging to manage, they can be satisfying to look after with the right approach. Skin and soft-tissue infections and complications of bacteraemia remain common, but outbreaks of rare infections do occur, so it is essential to remain alert for severe or unusual presentations.

References

  • 1.Frischer M, Goldberg D, Rahman M, Berney L. Mortality and survival among a cohort of drug injectors in Glasgow, 1982–1994. Addiction 1997;92: 419–27. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1997.tb03373.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Health Protection Agency, Health Protection Scotland, Public Health Wales, CDSC Northern Ireland, and the CRDHB Shooting up: infections among people who inject drugs in the UK 2009. London: Health Protection Agency, 2010. www.hpa.org.uk/webc/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1287143384395 [Accessed 29 August 2013]. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Health Protection Agency, Health Protection Scotland, Public Health Wales, and Public Health Agency Northern Ireland Shooting up: infections among people who inject drugs in the UK 2010. London: Health Protection Agency, 2011. www.hpa.org.uk/webc/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1317131377664 [Accessed 29 August 2013]. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ebright JR, Pieper B. Skin and soft tissue infections in injection drug users. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2002;16:697–712. 10.1016/S0891-5520(02)00017-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lamagni TL, Neal S, Keshishian C, et al. Severe Streptococcus pyogenes infections, United Kingdom, 2003–2004. Emerg Infect Dis 2008;14:201–9. 10.3201/eid1402.070888 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Murphy EL, DeVita D, Liu H, et al. Risk -factors for skin and soft-tissue abscesses among injection drug users: a case-control study. Clin Infect Dis 2001;33:35–40. 10.1086/320879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Roberts S, Chambers S. Diagnosis and management of Staphylococcus aureus infections of the skin and soft tissue. Intern Med J 2005;35:S97–105. 10.1111/j.1444-0903.2005.00983.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mackenzie AR, Laing RB, Douglas JG, et al. High prevalence of iliofemoral venous thrombosis with severe groin infection among injecting drug users in North East Scotland: successful use of low molecular weight heparin with antibiotics. Postgrad Med J 2000;76:561–5. 10.1136/pmj.76.899.561 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Anaya DA, Dellinger EP. Necrotizing soft-tissue infection: diagnosis and management. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44:705–10. 10.1086/511638 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Thwaites GE, Edgeworth JD, Gkrania-Klotsas E, et al. Clinical management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Lancet Infect Dis 2011;11:208–22. 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70285-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hind CR. Pulmonary complications of intravenous drug misuse. 2. Infective and HIV related complications. Thorax 1990;45:957–61. 10.1136/thx.45.12.957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Deiss RG, Rodwell TC, Garfein RS. Tuberculosis and illicit drug use: review and update. Clin Infect Dis 2009;48:72–82. 10.1086/594126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang JL, Chen KY, Fang CT, et al. Changing bacteriology of adult community-acquired lung abscess in Taiwan: Klebsiella pneumoniae versus anaerobes. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40:915–22. 10.1086/428574 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Frontera JA, Gradon JD. Right-side endocarditis in injection drug users: review of proposed mechanisms of pathogenesis. Clin Infect Dis 2000;30:374–9. 10.1086/313664 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Beynon RP, Bahl VK, Prendergast BD. Infective endocarditis. BMJ 2006;333:334–9. 10.1136/bmj.333.7563.334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wilson LE, Thomas DL, Astemborski J, et al. Prospective study of infective -endocarditis among injection drug users. J Infect Dis 2002;185:1761–6. 10.1086/340827 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ruotsalainen E, Sammalkorpi K, Laine J, et al. Clinical manifestations and outcome in Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis among injection drug users and nonaddicts: a prospective study of 74 patients. BMC Infect Dis 2006;6:137. 10.1186/1471-2334-6-137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ho J, Archuleta S, Sulaiman Z, Fisher D. Safe and successful treatment of intravenous drug users with a peripherally inserted central catheter in an outpatient parenteral antibiotic treatment service. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010;65:2641–4. 10.1093/jac/dkq355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yung D, Kottachchi D, Neupane B, et al. Antimicrobials for right-sided endocarditis in intravenous drug users: a systematic review. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007;60:921–8. 10.1093/jac/dkm324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Murray RJ. Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis: diagnosis and management guidelines. Intern Med J 2005;35:S25–44. 10.1111/j.1444-0903.2005.00978.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rabkin DG, Mokadam NA, Miller DW, et al. Long-term outcome for the surgical treatment of infective endocarditis with a focus on intravenous drug users. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;93:51–7. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.08.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Health Protection Scotland An outbreak of anthrax among drug users in Scotland, December 2009 to December 2010. A report on behalf of the National Anthrax Outbreak Control Team. Glasgow: Health Protection Scotland, 2011. www.documents.hps.scot.nhs.uk/giz/anthrax-outbreak/anthrax-outbreak-report-2011-12.pdf [Accessed 5 August 2013]. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Health Protection Report Anthrax cases among drug users in Europe: third update. Health Protection Report 2012;6:2 www.hpa.org.uk/hpr/archives/2012/news4412.htm#anthrax1211 [Accessed 29 August 2013]. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dixon TC, Meselson M, Guillemin J, Hanna PC. Anthrax. N Engl J Med 1999;341:815–26. 10.1056/NEJM199909093411107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Abramova FA, Grinberg LM, Yampolskaya OV, Walker DH. Pathology of inhalational anthrax in 42 cases from the Sverdlovsk outbreak of 1979. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;90:2291. 10.1073/pnas.90.6.2291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Holty JE, Bravata DM, Liu H, et al. Systematic review: a century of inhalational anthrax cases from 1900 to 2005. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:270–80. 10.7326/0003-4819-144-4-200602210-00009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Brett MM, Hallas G, Mpamugo O. Wound botulism in the UK and Ireland. J Med Microbiol 2004;53:555–61. 10.1099/jmm.0.05379-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.McGuigan CC, Penrice GM, Gruer L, et al. Lethal outbreak of infection with Clostridium novyi type A and other spore-forming organisms in Scottish injecting drug users. J Med Microbiol 2002;51:971–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Haber PS, Demirkol A, Lange K, Murnion B. Management of injecting drug users admitted to hospital. Lancet 2009;374:1284–93. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61036-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ruben SM, McLean PC, Melville J. Cyclizine abuse among a group of opiate dependents receiving methadone. Br J Addict 1989;84:929–34. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1989.tb00766.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kreek MJ, Garfield JW, Gutjahr CL, Giusti LM. Rifampin-induced methadone withdrawal. N Engl J Med 1976;294:1104–6. 10.1056/NEJM197605132942008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal College of Physicians

RESOURCES