Skip to main content
Clinical Medicine logoLink to Clinical Medicine
. 2013 Aug;13(4):398–400. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.13-4-398

Polymyalgia rheumatica: pathogenesis and management

Sarah Louise Mackie 1,
PMCID: PMC4954311  PMID: 23908514

Key points

Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is a treatable, inflammatory musculoskeletal disease mostly affecting those over 50 years of age

Diagnosis of PMR can be difficult and is primarily based on the history of the patient plus consideration of alternative diagnoses including infection, malignancy and other musculoskeletal disorders

It is important to check inflammatory markers prior to treatment. If either the symptoms or inflammatory markers do not respond rapidly to 15–20 mg prednisolone daily, the diagnosis of PMR should be reconsidered

Patients with PMR should be alerted to possible giant cell arteritis (GCA) symptoms, including what they should do if they develop any of these symptoms

Patients treated for PMR should be monitored for adverse effects of long-term glucocorticoids

What is polymyalgia rheumatica?

Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is an inflammatory musculoskeletal disorder, with a lifetime risk of 2.4% for women and 1.7% for men.1 Its cause is unknown, but ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies reveal extra-capsular inflammation, such as bursitis, in addition to synovitis.2 PMR classically responds very well to systemic glucocorticoids.

PMR, if undiagnosed, has devastating effects: patients typically cannot get out of, or even turn over in, bed. The catastrophic effects on physical functioning and quality of life are reversed by treatment.3 Rapid diagnosis is therefore essential.

Diagnosis of PMR can be challenging. The classical history consists of profound pain and stiffness affecting the neck, shoulder and hip areas. Symptoms are maximal in the morning and improve throughout the day. Physical examination may be unremarkable but may give clues to mimics of PMR (such as malignancy, deep seated infection or other inflammatory illness).4 Inflammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and plasma viscosity (PV) are typically -elevated.

Reflecting the difficulty in diagnosis, multiple sets of diagnostic criteria for PMR have been produced, none with perfect performance. Recent provisional criteria incorporate optional ultrasound features;5 it should be emphasised that these are classification criteria (disease-defining) and have not yet been validated as diagnostic criteria.

Relationship to giant cell arteritis

There is a well-known association between PMR and giant cell arteritis (GCA). Many patients with GCA also have polymyalgic symptoms and some patients with PMR subsequently develop GCA.6 A subset of patients with PMR may have subclinical GCA.7 There is some discussion as to whether PMR and GCA are separate disease entities or two conditions on a single pathophysiological spectrum. For the practising clinician it is important to realise that PMR and GCA are treated with different doses of glucocorticoids and that treatment of GCA is a medical emergency, whereas the immediate priority with PMR is to exclude other conditions before starting treatment. The subset of PMR patients that later develop GCA tend to have higher inflammatory markers and particular HLA-DRB1 alleles (a subclass of the human leukocyte antigen [HLA]) and so receive a higher than usual dose of glucocorticoids at PMR onset.6 Indeed, studies of GCA consistently reveal an association with HLA-DRB1*04 alleles, whereas no consistent HLA association of PMR has been found. At present PMR may be best viewed as a clinical syndrome with heterogeneous aetiology, overlapping with GCA in only a minority of cases.

Relationship to ageing

By far the strongest risk factor for PMR is increasing age. PMR is virtually unheard of in those under 50 years old and incidence of the disease becomes more common with each decade, with a peak incidence around 75 years. The reason for this is unclear. Ageing of the immune system (immunosenescence), ageing of the tissues and ageing of neurohumoral regulatory systems may all be involved. Based on the clustering of cases in space and time, it has been proposed that PMR may be triggered by infection in some cases. This could lead to persistent inflammation on a background of chronic low-grade inflammation secondary to decline in adaptive immunity and a compensatory increase in innate immune mechanisms. Neurohumoral mechanisms may also be involved.

Diagnosis

Diagnosis of PMR involves recognising the clinical syndrome of PMR and excluding common differential diagnoses. This has been conceptualised as a ‘stepped approach’.8

The clinical syndrome of PMR consists of pain and stiffness that is typically worst in the early hours of the morning or on waking, and tends to improve over the course of the day. The neck, shoulder and hip areas are classically affected first. Inflammatory markers are typically elevated and anaemia of inflammation may be present. If any of these features are missing then particular efforts should be made to search for other diagnoses prior to considering glucocorticoid treatment. ‘PMR with a normal ESR’ has been described; in these cases it is may be useful to check CRP levels.

Other features at presentation may support alternative diagnoses. Although weight loss, fever and synovitis/tenosynovitis have all been described in PMR, they should raise a suspicion of malignancy, of deep-seated or disseminated infection (such as endocarditis or osteomyelitis) or of inflammatory arthritides such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthropathy or crystal arthropathy.9,10

Even in apparently classical PMR, it is advisable to perform a complete physical investigation and basic laboratory investigations including tests for full blood count (FBC), urea and electrolytes (U+E), liver function tests (LFT), calcium, creatinine kinase (CK), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and immunoglobulins to screen for other medical conditions.8

Initial treatment

Once a clinical diagnosis of PMR has been made, treatment is commenced:11 15mg prednisolone daily is typically used. Clinical response does not confirm the diagnosis as many other inflammatory conditions also respond to glucocorticoids.5 However, failure to respond within a few days to 15–20 mg prednisolone daily should raise suspicions of other conditions and the diagnosis should be reconsidered. Also, patients with PMR may be left with some pain and stiffness despite glucocorticoid therapy,3,5 which may perhaps relate to comorbid osteoarthritis in older patients.

Ongoing treatment

After the initial symptomatic response to glucocorticoids, the dose is gradually reduced. A typical regimen is reduction by 2.5 mg prednisolone every 2–4 weeks, until reaching 10 mg daily, and then by 1 mg per month until cessation or until symptoms flare. Some patients need a slower reduction of 0.5 mg per month. Tapering of glucocorticoid dose should be guided by clinical symptoms, not by inflammatory markers; thus recording relevant patient-reported outcomes12 represents good practice. In the case of symptom flare, returning to the previous effective dose is usually sufficient. If GCA supervenes, treatment should be as for de novo GCA with high-dose glucocorticoids.

At present there does not seem to be any alternative to glucocorticoid therapy. Oral prednisolone/prednisone is currently used for almost all patients, but alternatives include periodic intramuscular methylprednisolone.13

There is little evidence to justify the use of steroid-sparing drugs in PMR. Methotrexate14–16 and azathioprine17 have been proposed, but one study15 gave negative results and methotrexate does not seem to lead to a substantial reduction in glucocorticoid-related adverse events.18 The difficulty with interpreting the evidence is the clinical heterogeneity of PMR and ascertainment issues of each case. It may be that the weak effect of methotrexate in some studies is due to patients with apparent PMR actually having RA, which usually responds well to methotrexate. However this theory is speculative. A similar argument applies to the small number of patients for whom biologic drugs have been tried, with mixed results.

Comorbidity

At the time of diagnosis of PMR it is important to assess patients for comorbidities and to continue to monitor patients during the course of treatment. Given the strong association with GCA, patients should be alerted to possible GCA symptoms (eg headache, scalp tenderness, jaw claudication, visual symptoms), but there is no need for a temporal artery biopsy if there are no clinical features of GCA. It is also important to remember that glucocorticoids can cause adverse effects in elderly people.19 When committing patients to long-term gluco-corticoid treatment, there should be an assessment of conditions that may be caused, or exacerbated, by glucocorticoids, including osteoporosis, diabetes, hypertension, vascular disease, increased body weight and peripheral oedema.20 These conditions should then be monitored during the course of the patient's treatment. Co-prescription of gastric and bone protection (at least calcium and vitamin D supplements) is advisable throughout the period of treatment with steroids.

Prognosis

It is important to keep an open mind about diagnosis, at least for the first year of treatment, as other conditions may take time to declare themselves. PMR itself is usually seen as a self-limiting disorder and the expectation is that glucocorticoid therapy can be gradually withdrawn and ultimately stopped. However, many patients relapse as the glucocorticoid dose is reduced, particularly those with higher inflammatory markers pre-treatment. Typically, half of all patients still require treatment 2 years after diagnosis.6 Because patients with PMR almost invariably receive glucocorticoids it is difficult to determine whether subsequent adverse events are due to the PMR, to the glucocorticoids, or both. When prospectively monitored, a high rate of adverse events has been noted.3 Patients should be involved in decisions about their treatment, as the balance between the risk of relapse and the risk of treatment-related complications may be different for each individual.

References

  • 1.Crowson CS, Matteson EL, Myasoedova E, et al. The lifetime risk of adult-onset rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory autoimmune rheumatic disorders. Arthritis Rheum 2011;63:633–9. 10.1002/art.30155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Camellino D, Cimmino MA. Imaging of polymyalgia rheumatica: indications on its pathogenesis, diagnosis and prognosis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012;51:77–86. 10.1093/rheumatology/keq450 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hutchings A, Hollywood J, Lamping DL, et al. Clinical outcomes, quality of life and diagnostic uncertainty in the first year of polymyalgia rheumatica. Arthritis Rheum 2007;57:803–9. 10.1002/art.22777 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gonzalez-Gay MA, Garcia-Porrua C, Salvarani C, et al. The spectrum of conditions mimicking polymyalgia rheumatica in Northwestern Spain. J Rheumatol 2000;27:2179–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dasgupta B, Cimmino MA, Kremers HM, et al. 2012 provisional classification criteria for polymyalgia rheumatica: a European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:943–54. 10.1002/art.34356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mackie SL, Hensor EM, Haugeberg G, et al. Can the prognosis of polymyalgia rheumatica be predicted at disease onset? Results from a 5-year prospective study. Rheumatology 2010;49:716–22. 10.1093/rheumatology/kep395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schmidt WA, Gromnica-Ihle E. Incidence of temporal arteritis in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica: a prospective study using colour Doppler ultrasonography of the temporal arteries. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2002;41:46–52. 10.1093/rheumatology/41.1.46 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dasgupta B, Borg FA, Hassan N, et al. BSR and BHPR guidelines for the management of polymyalgia rheumatica. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010;49:186–90. 10.1093/rheumatology/kep303a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pease CT, Haugeberg G, Morgan AW, et al. Diagnosing late onset rheumatoid arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, and temporal arteritis in patients presenting with polymyalgic symptoms. A prospective longterm evaluation. J Rheumatol 2005;32:1043–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Falsetti P, Acciai C, Volpe A, Lenzi L. Ultrasonography in early assessment of elderly patients with polymyalgic symptoms: a role in predicting diagnostic outcome? Scand J Rheumatol 2011;40:57–63. 10.3109/03009742.2010.486766 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hernández-Rodríguez J, Cid MC, López-Soto A, et al. Treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1839–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Matteson EL, Maradit-Kremers H, Cimmino MA, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in polymyalgia rheumatica. J Rheumatol 2012;39:795–803. 10.3899/jrheum.110977 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dasgupta B, Dolan AL, Panayi GS, Fernandes L. An initially double-blind controlled 96 week trial of depot methylprednisolone against oral prednisolone in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica. Br J Rheumatol 1998;37:189–95. 10.1093/rheumatology/37.2.189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ferraccioli G, Salaffi F, De Vita S, et al. Methotrexate in polymyalgia rheumatica: preliminary results of an open-randomized study. J Rheumatol 1996;23:624–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.van der Veen MJ, Dinant HJ, van Booma-Frankfort C, et al. Can methotrexate be used as a steroid-sparing agent in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis? Ann Rheum Dis 1996;55:218–23. 10.1136/ard.55.4.218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Caporali R, Cimmino MA, Ferraccioli G, et al. Prednisone plus methotrexate for polymyalgia rheumatica: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:493–500. 10.7326/0003-4819-141-7-200410050-00005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.De Silva M, Hazleman BL. Azathioprine in giant cell arteritis/polymyalgia rheumatica: a double-blind study. Ann Rheum Dis 1986;45:136–8. 10.1136/ard.45.2.136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cimmino MA, Salvarani C, Macchioni P, et al. Long-term follow-up of polymyalgia rheumatica patients treated with methotrexate and steroids. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2008;26:395–400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mazzantini M, Torre C, Miccoli M, et al. Adverse events during longterm low-dose glucocorticoid treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica: a retrospective study. J Rheumatol 2012;39:552–7. 10.3899/jrheum.110851 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.van der Goes MC, Jacobs JW, Boers M, et al. Monitoring adverse events of low-dose glucocorticoid therapy: EULAR recommendations for clinical trials and daily practice. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:1913–9. 10.1136/ard.2009.124958 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal College of Physicians

RESOURCES