Skip to main content
Clinical Medicine logoLink to Clinical Medicine
. 2015 Feb;15(1):82–85. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.15-1-82

Dengue: an update for clinicians working in non-endemic areas

Sophie Yacoub A,, Bridget Wills B
PMCID: PMC4954533  PMID: 25650206

ABSTRACT

Dengue is one of the most rapidly emerging viral infections globally, with 2.5 billion people now thought to live in dengue-endemic areas. In addition, reports of travel-related and autochthonous infections are increasing in non-endemic areas. Most patients with dengue experience a self-limiting febrile illness, but a proportion develop potentially life threatening complications around the time of fever clearance, including plasma leakage occasionally leading to shock, bleeding, and organ impairment. As dengue can present with non-specific symptoms of fever, headache and myalgias, the potential for misdiagnosis and inappropriate management by medical staff inexperienced with the disease is a concern. This short review will outline the latest World Health Organisation disease classification, potential complications, clinical assessment and management for clinicians working in non-endemic areas.

KEYWORDS : Dengue, update, travel, clinical, management

Key points

  • Dengue is emerging as the most abundant vector-borne viral illness in the world.

  • Travel-related and autochthonous infections are increasing in non-endemic areas.

  • Dengue can present with non-specific symptoms of fever, headache and myalgias and the potential for misdiagnosis and inappropriate management by medical staff unfamiliar with the disease is a cause for concern.

  • Most patients with dengue experience a self-limiting febrile illness but a proportion develop potentially life-threatening complications around the time of fever clearance, including plasma leakage occasionally leading to shock, bleeding and organ impairment.

  • Management currently relies on symptomatic and supportive treatment in the form of meticulous fluid balance for those identified to have significant plasma leakage.

Dengue is the most abundant vector-borne viral disease in the world. In the last 20 years the burden of disease has increased four-fold and 2.5 billion people are now thought to live in dengue-endemic areas. Latest estimates suggest there are around 100 million symptomatic dengue infections annually.1 South-East Asia has a particularly high disease burden, although in the last two decades Latin America and the Caribbean have also seen considerable expansion in case numbers. More recently, outbreaks have been reported from several African countries.2,3

Dengue can be caused by any one of four viral serotypes (dengue virus (DENV) 1–4), and is transmitted by day-biting urban-adapted Aedes mosquito species.4 After an incubation period of 4–14 days, symptomatic patients typically experience a self-limiting febrile illness with one or more of the following symptoms:

  •  high fever of up to 40˚C

  •  headache

  •  retro-orbital pain

  •  nausea/vomiting

  •  myalgia

  •  arthralgia

  •  rashes (Fig 1).

Fig 1.

Fig 1.

Spectrum of dengue associated rashes. (a) Macular-papular rash may be seen during the febrile phase; (b) petechial rash may develop during the febrile/critical phase particularly on arms and legs; (c) erythematous rash with ‘islands of white’ can be widespread and develop during the recovery phase.

This febrile phase lasts for 4–7 days, and once the temperature  settles most patients recover without complications.5 Crucially however, a small number of individuals go on to develop potentially serious complications during the 48 hours around defervescence (the critical phase) including plasma leakage, sometimes severe enough to cause hypovolaemic shock; coagulation derangements, sometimes associated with haemorrhage; and organ impairment (usually secondary to severe leakage and/or bleeding).6 With careful management the outcome is generally good and convalescence is typically short and uneventful, although it may be prolonged in adults with profound tiredness, aesthenia and depression persisting for weeks to months after recovery.7

The World Health Organisation (WHO) classification of dengue was updated in 2009,6 replacing the original dengue fever/dengue haemorrhagic fever grading, and now comprises the following entities:

  •  dengue

  •  dengue with warning signs (Box 1)

  •  severe dengue (Box 2).

Box 1. Warning signs.

graphic file with name 82box1.jpg

Box 2. Criteria for severe dengue.

graphic file with name 82box2.jpg

Development of severe dengue is strongly associated with secondary heterotypic DENV infections rather than primary infections.8 Age also has a strong influence on the clinical phenotype, with severe plasma leakage more likely to occur in children, while major bleeding is usually seen in adults.9

Dengue in non-endemic areas

Changing mosquito ecology, globalisation of trade and a remarkable increase in the volume of air travel have all influenced dengue epidemiology. Reports of travellers acquiring dengue are increasing, as are reports of autochthonous cases presenting in non-endemic areas where the mosquito vectors have become newly established.10 Surveillance data indicate that dengue is now the most common cause for fever in travellers returning from all geographical regions except sub-Saharan Africa and Central America, where malaria remains the most common cause.11,12 Travellers returning to Europe usually acquire dengue from South-East Asia, particularly Thailand,13 while in the USA the highest rates followed travel to Dominican Republic and Mexico.14 Autochthonous spread has been reported from the south of France and Croatia, and in 2012 the first European dengue outbreak since the 1920's occurred in Madeira, resulting in over 2,000 cases and 120 hospitalisations.15

Although most patients with travel-associated dengue have primary infections and thus are unlikely to develop severe disease, one study from Europe showed 11% of the 219 dengue infections reported between 2003–5 had complications, including internal haemorrhage, plasma leakage and shock.16 Recent reports of fatalities in Germany and Norway have highlighted the potential for misdiagnosis and inappropriate management by staff unfamiliar with the disease.17,18

Clinical assessment and laboratory diagnosis

In the early febrile phase dengue presents with clinical features similar to malaria and a wide variety of bacterial and viral infections.6 A detailed travel history is important, focused on timing and duration of stay in endemic areas, dengue seasonality and epidemic activity in the places visited, and predominant urban or rural stay.19 Simple laboratory investigations may help distinguish dengue from other infections, but are not definitive. Thrombocytopenia occurs almost universally, with a nadir around defervescence, and can help differentiate dengue from infections like influenza, measles and rubella. Leucopenia and a mild transaminitis are also seen, but other laboratory parameters are generally unaffected unless complications develop. Table 1 briefly summarises the clinical features and investigations to consider during each disease phase.

Table 1.

Assessment of suspected dengue patients during each disease phase.

graphic file with name 82tbl1.jpg

In the first week of illness, laboratory confirmation relies on identification of viral RNA using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), or detection of dengue non-structural protein 1 (NS1) using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).22,23 However, the viraemia is short so serodiagnostic tests (typically IgM Capture ELISA) are used from the end of the first week onwards, ideally with demonstration of seroconversion on paired samples. Rapid tests, often combining NS1 detection with an antibody test, are also available and have a reasonable window of detection.24

Management

A number of warning signs (Box 1) may occur during the transition into the critical phase. Of note, abdominal pain can be severe, and there are reports of surgery being performed for suspected acute abdomen before dengue was diagnosed.17,25 Symptomatic relief and regular outpatient review are usually sufficient in the absence of warning signs. Other high-risk groups include children and the elderly, pregnant women, and individuals with comorbidities (eg diabetes, hypertension or obesity).26,27 These patients should be seen at least once daily or admitted for close observation.

No specific antivirals or adjunctive therapies have shown benefit, so management relies on symptomatic and supportive treatment.28,29 This involves meticulous fluid balance and cautious intravenous fluid replacement for patients unable to tolerate oral fluids and those identified to have significant plasma leakage. The minimum volume of parenteral fluid should be given to achieve adequate organ perfusion while avoiding the well-recognised complication of fluid overload. Oral paracetamol can be given but NSAIDs should be avoided due to the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. Specific management for patients who develop severe dengue is out of the scope of this article and the WHO guidelines should be consulted.6

Conclusion

Dengue is one of the most rapidly emerging viral infections in the world, and as it continues to spread across the globe, travel-related infections are likely to increase. As climate change and globalisation facilitate the establishment of competent vectors in non-endemic areas, local transmission could also become more frequent. Awareness of dengue, the potential complications, and the essential principles of management is important for frontline healthcare personnel everywhere to avoid unnecessary morbidity and mortality.

References

  • 1.Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature 2013;496:504–7. 10.1038/nature12060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sessions OM, Khan K, Hou Y, et al. Exploring the origin and potential for spread of the 2013 dengue outbreak in Luanda Angola. Glob Health Action 2013;6:21822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Amarasinghe A, Kuritsk JN, Letson GW, Margolis HS. Dengue virus infection in Africa. Emerg Infect Dis 2011;17:1349–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yacoub S, Farrar J. Dengue. In: Manson's Tropical Diseases 23rd edn Philadelphia: Saunders Ltd; 2013: 162–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Whitehorn J, Farrar J. Dengue. Clin Med 2011;11:483–7. 10.7861/clinmedicine.11-5-483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.World Health Organization Dengue: Guidelines for treatment prevention and control. Geneva: WHO; 2009. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Seet RC, Quek AM, Lim EC. Post-infectious fatigue syndrome in dengue infection. J Clin Virol 2007;38:1–6. 10.1016/j.jcv.2006.10.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Guzman MG, Alvarez M, Halstead SB. Secondary infection as a risk factor for dengue hemorrhagic fever/dengue shock syndrome: an historical perspective and role of antibody-dependent enhancement of infection. Arch Virol 2013;158:1445–59. 10.1007/s00705-013-1645-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Trung DT, Thao le TT, Dung NM, et al. Clinical features of dengue in a large Vietnamese cohort: intrinsically lower platelet counts and greater risk for bleeding in adults than children. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2012;6:e1679. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Odolini S, Parola P, Gkrania-Klotsas E, et al. Travel-related imported infections in Europe EuroTravNet 2009. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012;18:468–74. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03596.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Freedman DO, Weld LH, Kozarsky PE, et al. Spectrum of disease and relation to place of exposure among ill returned travelers. N Engl J Med 2006;354:119–30. 10.1056/NEJMoa051331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Field V, Gautret P, Schlagenhauf P, et al. Travel and migration associated infectious diseases morbidity in Europe 2008. BMC Infect Dis 2010;10:330. 10.1186/1471-2334-10-330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rocklov J, Lohr W, Hjertqvist M, Wilder-Smith A. Attack rates of dengue fever in Swedish travellers. Scand J Infect Dis 2014;46:412–7. 10.3109/00365548.2014.887222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Travel-associated Dengue surveillance – United States 2006–2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2010;59:715–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tomasello D, Schlagenhauf P. Chikungunya and dengue auto-chthonous cases in Europe 2007–2012. Travel Med Infect Dis 2013;11:274–84. 10.1016/j.tmaid.2013.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wichmann O, Gascon J, Schunk M, et al. Severe dengue virus infection in travelers: risk factors and laboratory indicators. J Infect Dis 2007;195:1089–96. 10.1086/512680 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schmidt-Chanasit J, Tenner-Racz K, Poppert D, et al. Fatal dengue hemorrhagic fever imported into Germany. Infection 2012;40:441–3. 10.1007/s15010-011-0208-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vainio K, Noraas S, Holmberg M, et al. Fatal and mild primary dengue virus infections imported to Norway from Africa and south-east Asia 2008–2010. Euro Surveill 2010;15:pii=19666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wilder-Smith A, Schwartz E. Dengue in travelers. N Engl J Med 2005;353:924–32. 10.1056/NEJMra041927 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Michels M, Sumardi U, de Mast Q, et al. The predictive diagnostic value of serial daily bedside ultrasonography for severe dengue in Indonesian adults. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2013;7:e2277. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yacoub S, Wertheim H, Simmons CP, Screaton G, Wills B. Cardiovascular manifestations of the emerging dengue pandemic. Nat Rev Cardiol 2014;11:335–45. 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hang VT, Nguyet NM, Trung DT, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of NS1 ELISA and lateral flow rapid tests for dengue sensitivity specificity and relationship to viraemia and antibody responses. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2009;3:e360. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tang KF, Ooi EE. Diagnosis of dengue: an update. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2012;10:895–907. 10.1586/eri.12.76 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fry SR, Meyer M, Semple MG, et al. The diagnostic sensitivity of dengue rapid test assays is significantly enhanced by using a combined antigen and antibody testing approach. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2011;5:e1199. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.McFarlane ME, Plummer JM, Leake PA, et al. Dengue fever mimicking acute appendicitis: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2013;4:1032–4. 10.1016/j.ijscr.2013.08.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Anders KL, Nguyet NM, Chau NV, et al. Epidemiological factors associated with dengue shock syndrome and mortality in hospitalized dengue patients in Ho Chi Minh City Vietnam. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2011;84:127–34. 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pang J, Salim A, Lee VJ, et al. Diabetes with hypertension as risk factors for adult dengue hemorrhagic fever in a predominantly dengue serotype 2 epidemic: a case control study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2012;6:e1641. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Low JG, Sung C, Wijaya L, et al. Efficacy and safety of celgosivir in patients with dengue fever (CELADEN): a phase 1b randomised double-blind placebo-controlled proof-of-concept trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2014;14:706–15. 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70730-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tam DT, Ngoc TV, Tien NT, et al. Effects of short-course oral corticosteroid therapy in early dengue infection in Vietnamese patients: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis 2012;55:1216–24. 10.1093/cid/cis655 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal College of Physicians

RESOURCES