Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 22.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Robot Surg. 2015 Dec;2(1):49–52. doi: 10.1166/ajrs.2015.1023

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/Cas9 Genetic Engineering: Robotic Genetic Surgery

Kaivalya Deshpande 1, Arpita Vyas 2, Archana Balakrishnan 3, Dinesh Vyas 4,
PMCID: PMC4957700  NIHMSID: NIHMS802375  PMID: 27453936

Abstract

As a novel technology that utilizes the endogenous immune defense system in bacteria, CRISPR/Cas9 has transcended DNA engineering into a more pragmatic and clinically efficacious field. Using programmable sgRNA sequences and nucleases, the system effectively introduces double strand breaks in target genes within an entire organism. The applications of CRISPR range from biomedicine to drug development and epigenetic modification. Studies have demonstrated CRISPR mediated targeting of various tumorigenic genes and effector proteins known to be involved in colon carcinomas. This technology significantly expands the scope of gene manipulation and allows for an enhanced modeling of colon cancers, as well as various other malignancies.

Keywords: CRISPR/Cas9, DNA Engineering, Genetics, Robotics, Biotechnology

Introduction

DNA engineering and selective mutation targeting has been at the forefront of disease modeling and therapeutic intervention techniques. Its applications have a significant impact on understanding the genetic basis behind various carcinomas. Techniques such as miRNA mediated targeting have allowed for a better means of disease diagnosis and prognosis, specifically in colon carcinomas [1, 2]. However, due to the rising costs and tedious procedural concerns of DNA engineering, such methods present themselves as an option to only a small niche in the biomedical research community. Recently, the field of gene therapy was revolutionized with the advent of novel programmable nucleases, notably the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) system [3, 4].

An innate immune defense mechanism in bacteria

The CRISPR/Cas system is endogenously found in a wide range of bacteria and serves as a defense mechanism against invading viruses. The CRISPR portion of the system functions as an “immune memory” which stores the unique viral DNA sequence in-between sections of regularly interspaced palindromic repeated segments [5]. The CRISPR-associated proteins (Cas) portion of the system, its encoding genes located in close proximity to CRISPR genes, serves to snip the DNA of invading viruses [6]. The relationship between these two components of the system determines the efficacy and potency of the underlying DNA editing. CRISPR converts the unique viral DNA amongst its repeated segments to two RNA moieties: tracrRNA and crRNA, the former determining enzymatic activity and the latter substrate specificity [7]. Cas enzymes bind to this complex and traverse through the entire cell, tightly latching on to any genetic material from invading viruses that match the crRNA. Upon binding, the Cas enzymes cleave the target DNA, preventing further viral replication [8].

Modified use of CRISPR/Cas9 in biomedicine

The precision and potency of this system makes it an incredibly viable tool for biomedical and therapeutic advances. Utilizing a unique Cas enzyme (Cas9) from streptococcus pyogenes [9], and a chimeric single guide RNA (sgRNA) containing crRNA and tracrRNA [10, 11], the CRISPR system can be programmed to virtually target any sequence throughout a cell. Specifically, a unique plasmid is created which entails the necessary targeting and modifying instructions for the system on how to behave within in vivo cells (Fig 1). In order for Cas9 to bind to and cleave the target substrate, base pairing between target DNA and the 5′ end of sgRNA has to occur [11]. Thus, by modifying the sequence at the 5′ end of sgRNA, Cas9 can essentially be programmed to target a broad spectrum of sequences and trigger DNA double strand breaks (Fig 2). The nuclease-induced double stranded breaks can be repaired by both homology-directed repair (HDR) and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) pathways [12] —allowing for variable length insertion or deletion mutations along the code, ultimately regulating gene expression [7].

Fig.1. Essential elements of a CRISPR/Cas9 Plasmid.

Fig.1

The CRISPR/Cas9 plasmid is designed to be efficient and specific in its mechanism of action. In order for optimal gene targeting, the plasmid needs to entail the cleaving enzyme from streptococcus pyogenes, Cas9. The plasmid also contains the counterpart that dictates the specific sequence Cas9 will bind to, known as the guide RNA. Lastly, the included target sequence ensures that the cas9-guide RNA complex will bind only to elements containing the given sequence.

Fig.2. Schematic representation of the CRISPR/Cas9 mode of action.

Fig.2

[A] The designed single-guide RNA (sgRNA) contains the target gene (crRNA) as well as a guide element (tracrRNA).

[B] Cas9 cleaving enzyme recognizes and binds to the sgRNA, creating a complex that facilitates binding of sgRNA and the endogenous target gene.

[C] All endogenous genes containing the target sequence are located and the CRISPR/Cas9 complex binds and cleaves the specific DNA.

[D] Upon excision, the broken endogenous target gene undergoes attempted repair via Non-Homologous End Repair (NHEJ). However, the error prone method results in a non-functional sequence, rendering the target gene as well as its downstream mediators inactive.

CRISPR gene therapy in colon carcinomas

Genome editing via the CRISPR/Cas9 system can potentially easily and efficiently modify genes in a broad spectrum of cell types that have historically been difficult to genetically manipulate—including malignant or pre-malignant cell types. The application of CRISPR as a potential tumor suppressor tool in carcinomas, specifically colon derived, has been a rapidly advancing area in recent literature. Genome wide association studies (GWAS) have identified various nucleic acid changes associated with an increased risk for colorectal cancers [13]. In a recent study by Farnham et al, 66 risk-associated enhancers and promoters, specifically ones adjacent to the tumorigenic MYC gene, were identified as potential targets due to CRISPR therapy [13]. Using Cas9 nucleases, specific enhancers that harbored risk SNPs for colorectal cancer were deleted and downstream gene deregulation was assessed.

Employing the precise CRISPR guide technology, researchers are able to better analyze potential colorectal carcinoma promoting factors—especially those located in non-coding regions [14]. Additionally, CRISPR mediated genome editing can also be utilized for reverting loss-of-function (LOF) allele mutations. For instance, Newton et al were able to successfully revert the PKCβ A509T LOF mutation in DLD1 colon cancer cells resulting in a reduction in tumor volume [15]. The specific CRISPR/Cas9 sequence used was able to effectively restore PKC activity, reducing the severity of colon cancer tumor growth.

The application of CRIPSR/Cas9 can transcend beyond pre-clinical stages and even be utilized in reducing radiation sensitivity in colon carcinomas. Studies have used a unique CRISPR/Cas9 variant that targets membrane heat shock protein 70 (mHsp70), which is often overexpressed in the cystol of tumor cells [16]. It was demonstrated that nuclease-induced down-regulation of the membrane protein had a significant impact on colon carcinoma radiation resistance [16].

CRISPR/Cas9 applications in other fields

In addition to targeting and modulating gene expression in specific subtypes of colon carcinomas, the CRISPR/Cas9 system has a myriad of other applications. Many studies have documented in vivo CRISPR-guided genome editing for modeling cancers in which tumor-suppressor genes and oncogenes are targeted in hepatocarcinomas, lung adenocarcinomas, and haematopoietic malignancies [17-20]. The technology also allows researchers to better understand the functional organization of the genome and determine connections between genetic variation and phenotype. A few of the recent advances and potential applications utilizing the CRIPSR/Cas9 system are outlined in Table 1.

Table 1. Applications of genomic engineering through CRISPR/Cas9 technology.

Field Gene Targets Method Used Application
Biotechnology – Agriculture [21] ZmPDS, ZmIPK1A, ZmIPK, ZmMRP4; Zea mays (Maize) CRISPR/Cas induced mutations in Z. mays protoplasts Maize genome modification
Medicine – Drug Development [22] C528S mutation in the XPO1 gene confers cells with resistance to anti-cancer drug Selinexor C528S specific nuclease; CRISPR Understanding modes of drug resistance and drug-target interactions
Medicine – Epigenetic Control [23, 24] Cas9 epigenetic effectors (epiCas9s) Artificially remove and install epigenetic marks at various loci via Cas9 More precise epigenetic modification than currently used zinc finger proteins and TAL effectors

Concerns with the technology

The immense usability and power of CRISPR inevitably yields concerns and ethical issues underlying its applications. Gene editing and modulation, although with its numerous benefits, also present with many apprehensions throughout the biomedical community. One of the major issues with CRISPR is the ability to ensure that only the target gene is edited and changes hazardous to the individual's health are not introduced throughout the genome. Unwanted off-target site mutations could invariably lead to further malignancies and undesirable phenotypes [25]. In a recent study by Huang et al researchers have demonstrated the ability to perform human embryo editing with CRISPR, potentially triggering ethical dilemmas across the community [26, 27]. Studies have also successfully created CRISPR gene drives, allowing the instantaneous spread and evolution of an edited gene throughout populations. Such discoveries, albeit profound in the field of gene therapy, posit unavoidable political and ethical concerns for commercial usage as well as development.

Future Directions

Recent studies have developed a further means of bettering the CRISPR technology. As an effort to essentially make a sharper “molecular DNA scalpel” of CRISPR, Zhang and colleagues have discovered a novel RNA-guided DNA nuclease known as CPF1 (cite). The advantage of CPF1 over Cas9 is demonstrated through the CPF1 enzyme's ability to unevenly excise target DNA strands using minimal amounts of helper RNA, with even more enhanced precision (cite). The potential cost benefits of using reduced guide RNA, and the experimental implications of enhanced molecular precision will indubitably play a role in future of CRISPR technology.

Conclusion

The CRISPR/Cas9 system boasts precision and ease of use while being an applicable form of therapy for a variety of diseases. The ability to modify genes and their downstream targets allows CRISPR to be greatly effective in assessing colon carcinomas. By using sgRNA guides, tumorigenic colon cancer genes and SNPs in coding as well as non-coding regions can be studied and potentially destroyed. In addition, colon carcinoma promoting proteins such as deregulated protein kinase C isozymes, MYC effector proteins, and various inflammatory promoters, are viable targets for the programmable nucleases [3, 28, 29]. By understanding the implications behind its uses as well as concerns, CRISPR/Cas9 stands at the forefront of biomedical advances and serves to change the landscape of genetic engineering in a broad spectrum of clinical malignancies.

Footnotes

Conflict-of-interest statement: None

Contributor Information

Kaivalya Deshpande, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States.

Arpita Vyas, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States.

Archana Balakrishnan, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States.

Dinesh Vyas, Email: dinesh.vyas@ttuhsc.edu, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Department of Surgery, 61391 ODE Surgery.

References

  • 1.Hollis M, Nair K, Vyas A, Chaturvedi LS, Gambhir S, Vyas D. MicroRNAs potential utility in colon cancer: Early detection, prognosis, and chemosensitivity. World journal of gastroenterology : WJG. 2015;21(27):8284–8292. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i27.8284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Vyas D, Pihl K, Kavuturu S, Vyas A. Mesothelioma as a rapidly developing Giant Abdominal Cyst. World journal of surgical oncology. 2012;10:277. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-10-277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shuvalov O, Barlev NA. Current Genome Editing Tools in Gene Therapy: New Approachesto Treat Cancer. Current gene therapy. 2015 doi: 10.2174/1566523215666150818110241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012;337(6096):816–821. doi: 10.1126/science.1225829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Heler R, Marraffini LA, Bikard D. Adapting to new threats: the generation of memory by CRISPR-Cas immune systems. Molecular microbiology. 2014;93(1):1–9. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fineran PC, Charpentier E. Memory of viral infections by CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems: acquisition of new information. Virology. 2012;434(2):202–209. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2012.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sander JD, Joung JK. CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes. Nature biotechnology. 2014;32(4):347–355. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Westra ER, van Erp PB, Kunne T, Wong SP, Staals RH, Seegers CL, Bollen S, Jore MM, Semenova E, Severinov K, de Vos WM, Dame RT, de Vries R, Brouns SJ, van der Oost J. CRISPR immunity relies on the consecutive binding and degradation of negatively supercoiled invader DNA by Cascade and Cas3. Molecular cell. 2012;46(5):595–605. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.03.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kleinstiver BP, Prew MS, Tsai SQ, Topkar VV, Nguyen NT, Zheng Z, Gonzales AP, Li Z, Peterson RT, Yeh JR, Aryee MJ, Joung JK. Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities. Nature. 2015;523(7561):481–485. doi: 10.1038/nature14592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fan D, Liu T, Li C, Jiao B, Li S, Hou Y, Luo K. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Targeted Mutagenesis in Populus in the First Generation. Scientific reports. 2015;5:12217. doi: 10.1038/srep12217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Larson MH, Gilbert LA, Wang X, Lim WA, Weissman JS, Qi LS. CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Nature protocols. 2013;8(11):2180–2196. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vartak SV, Raghavan SC. Inhibition of Nonhomologous End Joining to Increase the Specificity of CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing. The FEBS journal. 2015;9(5) doi: 10.1111/febs.13416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yao L, Tak YG, Berman BP, Farnham PJ. Functional annotation of colon cancer risk SNPs. Nature communications. 2014;5:5114. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Perez-Pinera P, Jones MF, Lal A, Lu TK. Putting Non-coding RNA on Display with CRISPR. Molecular cell. 2015;59(2):146–148. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Antal CE, Hudson AM, Kang E, Zanca C, Wirth C, Stephenson NL, Trotter EW, Gallegos LL, Miller CJ, Furnari FB, Hunter T, Brognard J, Newton AC. Cancer-associated protein kinase C mutations reveal kinase's role as tumor suppressor. Cell. 2015;160(3):489–502. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Murakami N, Kuhnel A, Schmid TE, Ilicic K, Stangl S, Braun IS, Gehrmann M, Molls M, Itami J, Multhoff G. Role of membrane Hsp70 in radiation sensitivity of tumor cells. Radiation oncology. 2015;10:149. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0461-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kennedy EM, Bassit LC, Mueller H, Kornepati AV, Bogerd HP, Nie T, Chatterjee P, Javanbakht H, Schinazi RF, Cullen BR. Suppression of hepatitis B virus DNA accumulation in chronically infected cells using a bacterial CRISPR/Cas RNA-guided DNA endonuclease. Virology. 2015;476:196–205. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2014.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sanchez-Rivera FJ, Jacks T. Applications of the CRISPR-Cas9 system in cancer biology. Nature reviews Cancer. 2015;15(7):387–395. doi: 10.1038/nrc3950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Platt RJ, Chen S, Zhou Y, Yim MJ, Swiech L, Kempton HR, Dahlman JE, Parnas O, Eisenhaure TM, Jovanovic M, Graham DB, Jhunjhunwala S, Heidenreich M, Xavier RJ, Langer R, Anderson DG, Hacohen N, Regev A, Feng G, Sharp PA, Zhang F. CRISPR-Cas9 knockin mice for genome editing and cancer modeling. Cell. 2014;159(2):440–455. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hendel A, Bak RO, Clark JT, Kennedy AB, Ryan DE, Roy S, Steinfeld I, Lunstad BD, Kaiser RJ, Wilkens AB, Bacchetta R, Tsalenko A, Dellinger D, Bruhn L, Porteus MH. Chemically modified guide RNAs enhance CRISPR-Cas genome editing in human primary cells. Nature biotechnology. 2015 doi: 10.1038/nbt.3290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liang Z, Zhang K, Chen K, Gao C. Targeted mutagenesis in Zea mays using TALENs and the CRISPR/Cas system. Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao. 2014;41(2):63–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2013.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Neggers JE, Vercruysse T, Jacquemyn M, Vanstreels E, Baloglu E, Shacham S, Crochiere M, Landesman Y, Daelemans D. Identifying drug-target selectivity of small-molecule CRM1/XPO1 inhibitors by CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. Chemistry & biology. 2015;22(1):107–116. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yao S, He Z, Chen C. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing of Epigenetic Factors for Cancer Therapy. Human gene therapy. 2015;26(7):463–471. doi: 10.1089/hum.2015.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wen WS, Yuan ZM, Ma SJ, Xu J, Yuan DT. CRISPR-Cas9 systems: versatile cancer modelling platforms and promising therapeutic strategies. International journal of cancer Journal international du cancer. 2015;15(4):382–392. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Anderson EM, Haupt A, Schiel JA, Chou E, Machado HB, Strezoska Z, Lenger S, McClelland S, Birmingham A, Vermeulen A, Smith AV. Systematic analysis of CRISPR-Cas9 mismatch tolerance reveals low levels of off-target activity. Journal of biotechnology. 2015;211:56–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.06.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Krishan K, Kanchan T, Singh B. Human Genome Editing and Ethical Considerations. Science and engineering ethics. 2015;314:43–46. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9675-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Liang P, Xu Y, Zhang X, Ding C, Huang R, Zhang Z, Lv J, Xie X, Chen Y, Li Y, Sun Y, Bai Y, Songyang Z, Ma W, Zhou C, Huang J. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human tripronuclear zygotes. Protein & cell. 2015;6(5):363–372. doi: 10.1007/s13238-015-0153-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jiang W, Marraffini LA. CRISPR-Cas: New Tools for Genetic Manipulations from Bacterial Immunity Systems. Annual review of microbiology. 2015;612:331–342. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-091014-104441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vidigal JA, Ventura A. Rapid and efficient one-step generation of paired gRNA CRISPR-Cas9 libraries. Nature communications. 2015;6:8083. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Clontech-Takara. The CRISPR/Cas9 system for targeted genome editing. 2015 [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES