Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2016 Jul 22;60(8):4743–4749. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00220-16

In Vitro Susceptibility of Global Surveillance Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Ceftazidime-Avibactam (INFORM 2012 to 2014)

Wright W Nichols a,*, Boudewijn L M de Jonge a, Krystyna M Kazmierczak b,, James A Karlowsky b, Daniel F Sahm b
PMCID: PMC4958170  PMID: 27216074

Abstract

Broth microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed for ceftazidime-avibactam and comparator agents against 7,062 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected from 2012 to 2014 in four geographic regions (Europe, Asia/South Pacific, Latin America, Middle East/Africa) as part of the International Network for Optimal Resistance Monitoring (INFORM) global surveillance program. The majority of isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, with the proportions susceptible differing marginally across the four regions (MIC90, 8 to 16 μg/ml; 88.7 to 93.2% susceptible), in contrast to lower susceptibilities to the following comparator β-lactam agents: ceftazidime (MIC90, 32 to 64 μg/ml; 71.5 to 80.8% susceptible), meropenem (MIC90, >8 μg/ml; 64.9 to 77.4% susceptible), and piperacillin-tazobactam (MIC90, >128 μg/ml; 62.3 to 71.3% susceptible). Compared to the overall population, susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam of isolates that were nonsusceptible to ceftazidime (n = 1,627) was reduced to between 56.8% (Middle East/Africa; MIC90, 64 μg/ml) and 68.9% (Asia/South Pacific; MIC90, 128 μg/ml), but these percentages were higher than susceptibilities to other β-lactam agents (0 to 44% susceptible, depending on region and agent; meropenem MIC90, >8 μg/ml; 26.5 to 43.9% susceptible). For this subset of isolates, susceptibilities to amikacin (MIC90, >32 μg/ml; 53.2 to 80.0% susceptible) and colistin (MIC90, 1 μg/ml; 98.5 to 99.5% susceptible) were comparable to or higher than that of ceftazidime-avibactam. A similar observation was made with isolates that were nonsusceptible to meropenem (n = 1,926), with susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam between 67.8% (Middle East/Africa; MIC90, 64 μg/ml) and 74.2% (Europe; MIC90, 32 μg/ml) but again with reduced susceptibility to comparators except for amikacin (MIC90, >32 μg/ml; 56.8 to 78.7% susceptible) and colistin (MIC90, 1 μg/ml; 98.9 to 99.3% susceptible). Of the 8% of isolates not susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, the nonsusceptibility of half could be explained by their possession of genes encoding metallo-β-lactamases. The data reported here are consistent with results from other country-specific and regional surveillance studies and show that ceftazidime-avibactam demonstrates in vitro activity against globally collected clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa, including isolates that are resistant to ceftazidime and meropenem.

INTRODUCTION

Ceftazidime has been an important antibacterial agent in the treatment of infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa since the early 1980s (1, 2). However, mutational resistance can develop by stable derepression of the normally inducible chromosomally encoded AmpC β-lactamase (3), and by other non-β-lactamase-mediated mutations (4, 5). In addition, exogenously acquired resistance through the acquisition of genes encoding β-lactamases, such as blaVIM-2 (6), has also been reported, though it is less common than mutational resistance (4, 7). As a result, the effectiveness of ceftazidime against P. aeruginosa has significantly eroded (47).

Avibactam is a non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor that inhibits class A, class C, and some class D β-lactamases (8). Among the class C β-lactamases, avibactam inhibits the AmpC enzyme of P. aeruginosa (8, 9). When avibactam is combined with ceftazidime, this inhibition results in the restoration of ceftazidime activity against P. aeruginosa isolates that are resistant to ceftazidime through stably derepressed synthesis of the AmpC enzyme, regardless of the allelic variant of blaAmpC carried (10, 11). The inhibition by avibactam of the P. aeruginosa AmpC β-lactamase in vitro restores not only low MICs of ceftazidime against that organism but also bactericidal activity at those lower concentrations (12). The restoration of in vitro activity translates to restoration of ceftazidime efficacy against ceftazidime-resistant P. aeruginosa in vivo (1315). The restoration by avibactam of the in vitro activity of ceftazidime described above has extended to collections of unselected clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa in surveillance studies (1624).

Ceftazidime-avibactam has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA) for the treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections and complicated urinary tract infections caused by P. aeruginosa and other Gram-negative species in patients with limited or no alternative treatment options (25). Surveillance studies are an important tool to monitor the activity of agents on a local and global level and to detect the possible emergence of resistance that might compromise therapy, as has been observed for ceftazidime-avibactam in vitro (13, 26). In the present work, the activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against P. aeruginosa was assessed through the International Network for Optimal Resistance Monitoring (INFORM) global surveillance study across four regions for 3 years (2012 to 2014), by (i) comparing the relative in vitro activities of ceftazidime and ceftazidime-avibactam, in order to understand what extra proportion of susceptible isolates is provided by the inhibition of β-lactamases by avibactam in vitro; (ii) examining the potential clinical value that ceftazidime-avibactam might represent based on its in vitro activity compared to the activities of other important antipseudomonal agents, such as meropenem, imipenem, doripenem, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, amikacin, and colistin; and (iii) placing this study of recent clinical isolates into context with other recent surveillance studies (1624) and studies that were confined to subpopulations of isolates of P. aeruginosa selected as being resistant to ceftazidime or other β-lactams (2729).

(Parts of this research were presented at the 24th, 25th, and 26th European Congresses of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases [3032] and the 54th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy [33].)

MATERIALS AND METHODS

P. aeruginosa isolates.

From 2012 to 2014, the INFORM global surveillance program collected 7,062 isolates of P. aeruginosa from medical center laboratories in Europe (19 countries, 93 laboratories), Asia/South Pacific (9 countries, 41 laboratories), Latin America (6 countries, 26 laboratories), and the Middle East/Africa (5 countries, 16 laboratories). All isolates were shipped to a central reference laboratory, International Health Management Associates, Inc. (IHMA; Schaumburg, IL, USA), where their identities were confirmed as P. aeruginosa by the use of MALDI-TOF (matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight) spectrometry (Biotyper instrument; Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standard method for broth microdilution using in-house-prepared, 96-well panels (34, 35). Avibactam was tested at a fixed concentration of 4 μg/ml in combination with doubling dilutions of ceftazidime (25). Colistin was tested with a final concentration of 0.002% polysorbate 80 in each panel well (36). MICs of all agents except ceftazidime-avibactam were interpreted using CLSI breakpoints (34). Ceftazidime-avibactam MICs were interpreted using U.S. FDA MIC breakpoints for P. aeruginosa (25) (susceptible, ≤8 μg/ml; resistant, ≥16 μg/ml) because the CLSI currently does not publish MIC interpretative breakpoints for this agent.

Screening isolates for β-lactamase genes.

All meropenem-, imipenem-, and doripenem-nonsusceptible isolates were screened for the presence of genes encoding carbapenemases (KPC, OXA-24 family, GES, VIM, IMP, NDM, SPM, GIM) and selected extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs; SHV, TEM, VEB, PER, GES) using Qiagen's multiplex PCR kit (Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's recommendations and published primer sets (37, 38). The genes detected were sequenced and compared to sequences in publically available databases (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov; www.lahey.org).

RESULTS

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for ceftazidime-avibactam and comparator agents are shown in Table 1. The susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam was 92.0% overall, with slight variations (88.7 to 93.2%) across the surveyed geographic regions, and exceeded the susceptibilities to all other β-lactams tested, including carbapenems (57.2 to 78.5% susceptible, depending on compound and region). Susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam was comparable or greater than that to amikacin (81.8 to 94.4% susceptible). Colistin was the most active agent tested, with over 99% of the isolates susceptible to this agent. The MIC90s for ceftazidime-avibactam were 8 μg/ml for isolates from Europe, Asia/South Pacific, and Middle East/Africa and 16 μg/ml (with 88.7% of isolates susceptible) for isolates from Latin America, where susceptibilities to other agents were also generally lower except for that to colistin. The MIC90 for ceftazidime-avibactam was consistently two to three doubling dilutions lower than the MIC90 for ceftazidime in all four geographic regions (Tables 1 and 2).

TABLE 1.

In vitro activities of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparator agents tested against 7,062 P. aeruginosa isolates collected in 2012 to 2014 from patients in four geographic regions

Region (no. of isolates) Antimicrobial agenta MIC90 (μg/ml) % Susceptibleb
All (7,062) Ceftazidime-avibactam 8 92.0
Ceftazidime 64 77.0
Cefepime >16 78.3
Piperacillin-tazobactam >128 68.6
Doripenem >4 74.3
Meropenem >8 72.7
Imipenem >8 61.4
Colistin 1 99.5
Amikacin 32 89.4
Levofloxacin >4 71.9
Europe (3,893) Ceftazidime-avibactam 8 92.6
Ceftazidime 64 77.4
Cefepime 16 78.8
Piperacillin-tazobactam >128 69.4
Doripenem >4 74.4
Meropenem >8 72.9
Imipenem >8 60.3
Colistin 1 99.5
Amikacin 32 89.7
Levofloxacin >4 71.3
Asia/South Pacific (1,392) Ceftazidime-avibactam 8 93.2
Ceftazidime 64 78.1
Cefepime 16 80.2
Piperacillin-tazobactam >128 71.3
Doripenem >4 78.5
Meropenem >8 77.4
Imipenem >8 67.0
Colistin 1 99.5
Amikacin 8 94.4
Levofloxacin >4 77.2
Latin America (1,088) Ceftazidime-avibactam 16 88.7
Ceftazidime 64 71.5
Cefepime >16 73.2
Piperacillin-tazobactam >128 62.3
Doripenem >4 66.8
Meropenem >8 64.9
Imipenem >8 57.2
Colistin 1 99.4
Amikacin >32 81.8
Levofloxacin >4 64.7
Middle East/Africa (689) Ceftazidime-avibactam 8 91.7
Ceftazidime 32 80.8
Cefepime 16 79.5
Piperacillin-tazobactam >128 68.8
Doripenem >4 77.1
Meropenem >8 74.8
Imipenem >8 63.3
Colistin 1 99.6
Amikacin 16 90.1
Levofloxacin >4 75.9
a

Colistin was tested in the presence of a final concentration of 0.002% polysorbate 80.

b

Values are based on CLSI breakpoints, except for ceftazidime-avibactam, for which FDA breakpoints were used.

TABLE 2.

Cumulative MIC distributions for ceftazidime and ceftazidime-avibactam against 7,062 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa in 2012 to 2014 in four geographic regions

Isolate type or region (no. of isolates) Antimicrobial agent No. (cumulative %) of isolates inhibited at an MIC (μg/ml) ofa:
≤0.5 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 >128
All isolates (7,062) Ceftazidime 93 (1.3) 606 (9.9) 2,805 (49.6) 1,295 (68.0) 636 (77.0) 320 (81.5) 479 (88.3) 452 (94.7) 190 (97.4) 186 (100)
Ceftazidime-avibactam 167 (2.4) 1,178 (19.0) 3,241 (64.9) 1,159 (81.4) 754 (92.0) 176 (94.5) 163 (96.8) 115 (98.5) 47 (99.1) 62 (100)
MBLb negative (6,756)c Ceftazidime 93 (1.4) 606 (10.3) 2,803 (51.8) 1,295 (71.0) 630 (80.3) 285 (84.5) 390 (90.3) 364 (95.7) 163 (98.1) 127 (100)
Ceftazidime-avibactam 167(2.5) 1,178 (19.9) 3,238 (67.8) 1,159 (85.0) 742 (96.0) 130 (97.9) 68 (98.9) 43 (99.5) 15 (99.8) 16 (100)
Europe (3,893) Ceftazidime 60 (1.5) 361 (10.8) 1,542 (50.4) 711 (68.7) 339 (77.4) 178 (82.0) 272 (89.0) 255 (95.5) 94 (97.9) 81 (100)
Ceftazidime-avibactam 106 (2.7) 710 (21.0) 1,759 (66.1) 635 (82.5) 395 (92.6) 99 (95.1) 92 (97.5) 58 (99.0) 18 (99.5) 21 (100)
Asia/South Pacific (1,392) Ceftazidime 16 (1.1) 102 (8.5) 591 (50.9) 251 (69.0) 127 (78.1) 51 (81.8) 79 (87.4) 84 (93.5) 38 (96.2) 53 (100)
Ceftazidime-avibactam 32 (2.3) 208 (17.2) 691 (66.9) 218 (82.5) 148 (93.2) 17 (94.4) 12 (95.3) 21 (96.8) 17 (98.0) 28 (100)
Latin America (1,088) Ceftazidime 13 (1.2) 86 (9.1) 392 (45.1) 190 (62.6) 97 (71.5) 70 (77.9) 85 (85.8) 70 (92.2) 38 (95.7) 47 (100)
Ceftazidime-avibactam 20 (1.8) 156 (16.2) 469 (59.3) 175 (75.4) 145 (88.7) 47 (93.0) 43 (97.0) 17 (98.5) 6 (99.1) 10 (100)
Middle East/Africa (689) Ceftazidime 4 (0.6) 57 (8.9) 280 (49.5) 143 (70.2) 73 (80.8) 21 (83.9) 43 (90.1) 43 (96.4) 20 (99.3) 5 (100)
Ceftazidime-avibactam 9 (1.3) 104 (16.4) 322 (63.1) 131 (82.1) 66 (91.7) 13 (93.6) 16 (95.9) 19 (98.7) 6 (99.6) 3 (100)
a

MIC90s are in bold.

b

MBL, metallo-β-lactamase.

c

This isolate type includes carbapenem-sensitive and carbapenem-nonsusceptible metallo-β-lactamase-negative isolates.

Of the 7,062 isolates of P. aeruginosa collected, 2,840 were nonsusceptible to one or more of the carbapenems tested and were molecularly characterized for the presence of relevant β-lactamase genes (Table 3). Three hundred six isolates (10.8% of this nonsusceptible subpopulation, 4.3% of all isolates) were identified as metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) positive (269 VIM type, 34 IMP type, 3 NDM-1), with 21 of these cocarrying an ESBL, serine carbapenemase, or TEM type original-spectrum β-lactamase (OSBL). In addition, 76 MBL-negative isolates that encoded serine carbapenemases were identified (KPC-2, GES-2, GES-5, GES-6, GES-13), as well as 16 that carried GES ESBLs and carbapenemases (GES-1 and GES-5; GES-19 and GES-20), 70 that encoded ESBLs (SHV, VEB, PER, and GES type), 1 that carried a GES with an undefined spectrum of activity, and 11 that carried only a TEM-type OSBL. In 2,360 isolates (83.1% of the carbapenem-nonsusceptible subpopulation, 33.4% of all isolates), no acquired β-lactamase gene could be detected, and carbapenem nonsusceptibility in most of these isolates was likely due to porin defects and/or upregulated efflux in combination with overexpression of chromosomal AmpC (39). Alternatively, some might also contain β-lactamases that were not part of the screening algorithm. Most metallo-β-lactamase-positive isolates (291/306; 95.1%) were resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam, which was expected since avibactam does not inhibit these types of enzymes (Table 3) (40). For the remainder of the isolates (i.e., those without detected metallo-β-lactamase genes, n = 6,756), 96.0% were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, compared to only 80.3% for ceftazidime (Table 2).

TABLE 3.

Occurrence of β-lactamase genes in carbapenem-nonsusceptible P. aeruginosa isolates, stratified by phenotypea

Parameter, phenotype, and β-lactamase content Enzyme type Total no. of isolates No. of isolates that were:
CAZ-NS CAZ-NS, CAZ-AVI-S CAZ-NS, CAZ-AVI-R
Total tested 7,062 1,627 1,064 563
Carbapenem NSb 2,840 1,257 709 548
    MBL positive, with or without serine β-lactamase genes VIM ± TEM-OSBL 252 244 6 238
VIM + VEB 6 6 6
VIM + PER 5 5 5
VIM + SHV 4 4 1 3
VIM + GES ESBL-like 1 1 1
VIM + KPC 1 1 1
IMP ± TEM-OSBL 34 34 34
NDM 1 1 1
NDM + VEB 2 2 2
    KPC positive, MBL negative KPC 28 28 22 6
    GES positive, MBL negative GES carbapenemase 48 39 38 1
GES carbapenemase + GES ESBL-like 16 16 2 14
GES ESBL-like 20 20 8 12
GES spectrum undefined 1 1 1
    ESBL positive, MBL negative VEB ± TEM-OSBL 25 25 25
PER ± TEM-OSBL 23 22 9 13
SHV 2 2 1 1
    OSBL positive, MBL negative TEM-OSBL 11 7 7
    No acquired bla detectedc 2,360 799 615 184
Carbapenem S (not characterized) 4,222 370 355 15
a

CAZ, ceftazidime; CAZ-AVI, ceftazidime-avibactam; S, susceptible; NS, nonsusceptible; R, resistant.

b

Isolates nonsusceptible to meropenem, imipenem, or doripenem were screened for β-lactamase (bla) genes.

c

Isolates are presumed to contain the chromosomal ampC gene common to P. aeruginosa.

A total of 563 ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant isolates were identified in this study (8% of all isolates). Of these, 291 (51.7%) were metallo-β-lactamase positive, 21 isolates carried genes for serine carbapenemases (KPC-2, GES type) with or without ESBLs, 1 isolate carried a GES of undefined activity, and 51 isolates harbored only ESBLs, i.e., SHV-5 (1 isolate), VEB type (25 isolates), PER type (13 isolates), or GES type (12 isolates). No acquired β-lactamase gene could be identified in the remaining 199 ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant isolates (Table 3).

The percentage of isolates from each geographic region that tested as nonsusceptible to ceftazidime ranged from 19.2 to 28.5% (Table 1). Between 56.8 and 68.9% of these ceftazidime-nonsusceptible P. aeruginosa isolates remained susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, the highest percentage compared to all other β-lactams tested (cefepime, <22% susceptible; piperacillin-tazobactam, <8%; carbapenems, <44%) (Table 4). This subset of isolates showed comparable or higher susceptibilities to colistin and amikacin in all regions but Latin America, where only 53.2% of isolates remained susceptible to amikacin. Table S1 in the supplemental material demonstrates that the MIC90 of ceftazidime-avibactam for ceftazidime-nonsusceptible, metallo-β-lactamase-negative isolates was at least two to three doubling dilutions lower than that of ceftazidime against the same isolates in all four geographic regions, with 72.4 to 82.7% of those isolates being susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam.

TABLE 4.

In vitro activities of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparator agents tested against 1,627 ceftazidime-nonsusceptible P. aeruginosa isolates collected in 2012 to 2014 from patients in four geographic regions

Region (no. of isolates) Antimicrobial agenta MIC90 (μg/ml) % Susceptibleb
All (1,627) Ceftazidime-avibactam 64 65.4
Ceftazidime >128 0
Cefepime >16 19.7
Piperacillin-tazobactam >128 5.4
Doripenem >4 32.4
Meropenem >8 31.8
Imipenem >8 26.1
Colistin 1 99.1
Amikacin >32 65.7
Levofloxacin >4 32.3
Europe (880) Ceftazidime-avibactam 64 67.3
Ceftazidime 128 0
Cefepime >16 21.6
Piperacillin-tazobactam >128 5.6
Doripenem >4 30.5
Meropenem >8 29.6
Imipenem >8 23.2
Colistin 1 99.5
Amikacin >32 66.0
Levofloxacin >4 30.8
Asia/South Pacific (305) Ceftazidime-avibactam 128 68.9
Ceftazidime >128 0
Cefepime >16 21.0
Piperacillin-tazobactam >128 7.2
Doripenem >4 42.0
Meropenem >8 43.9
Imipenem >8 38.4
Colistin 1 98.7
Amikacin >32 80.0
Levofloxacin >4 43.0
Latin America (310) Ceftazidime-avibactam 64 60.3
Ceftazidime >128 0
Cefepime >16 16.1
Piperacillin-tazobactam >128 4.2
Doripenem >4 26.8
Meropenem >8 26.5
Imipenem >8 22.6
Colistin 1 98.7
Amikacin >32 53.2
Levofloxacin >4 26.8
Middle East/Africa (132) Ceftazidime-avibactam 64 56.8
Ceftazidime 128 0
Cefepime >16 12.1
Piperacillin-tazobactam >128 3.0
Doripenem >4 35.6
Meropenem >8 31.8
Imipenem >8 25.0
Colistin 1 98.5
Amikacin >32 59.9
Levofloxacin >4 31.1
a

Colistin was tested in the presence of a final concentration of 0.002% polysorbate 80.

b

Values are based on CLSI breakpoints, except for ceftazidime-avibactam, for which FDA breakpoints were used.

The percentage of isolates from each geographic region that were meropenem nonsusceptible ranged from 22.6 to 35.1% (Table 1). In total, there were 1,926 meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates, 84.4% (1,626) of which were metallo-β-lactamase negative. Compared to the findings for the overall population, the percentages of susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam in meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates of P. aeruginosa decreased only 18 to 24% to between 67.8 and 74.2%, depending on the region, whereas the activities of other β-lactams were much more reduced (cefepime, ≤43% susceptible; piperacillin-tazobactam, <32%; doripenem and imipenem, <10%) (Table 5). The meropenem-nonsusceptible P. aeruginosa isolates showed higher percentages of susceptibility to colistin in all regions, whereas the percentages of susceptibility to amikacin were comparable or higher in the Asia/South Pacific and Middle East/Africa regions. The percentage of susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam among the meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates was 72.4%, which increased to 84.9% when isolates harboring metallo-β-lactamase genes were excluded, and this trend was apparent across all surveyed regions (see Table S2 in the supplemental material).

TABLE 5.

In vitro activities of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparator agents tested against 1,926 meropenem-nonsusceptible P. aeruginosa isolates collected in 2012 to 2014 from patients in four geographic regions

Region (no. of isolates) Antimicrobial agenta MIC90 (μg/ml) % Susceptibleb
All (1,926) Ceftazidime-avibactam 64 72.4
Ceftazidime 128 42.4
Cefepime >16 41.0
Piperacillin-tazobactam >128 28.4
Doripenem >4 9.3
Meropenem >8 0
Imipenem >8 4.8
Colistin 1 99.2
Amikacin >32 67.4
Levofloxacin >4 34.0
Europe (1,056) Ceftazidime-avibactam 32 74.2
Ceftazidime 128 41.3
Cefepime >16 41.0
Piperacillin-tazobactam >128 27.0
Doripenem >4 9.8
Meropenem >8 0
Imipenem >8 4.7
Colistin 1 99.3
Amikacin >32 68.1
Levofloxacin >4 33.0
Asia/South Pacific (314) Ceftazidime-avibactam 128 71.7
Ceftazidime >128 45.5
Cefepime >16 43.0
Piperacillin-tazobactam >128 30.6
Doripenem >4 9.2
Meropenem >8 0
Imipenem >8 5.7
Colistin 1 99.0
Amikacin >32 78.7
Levofloxacin >4 39.5
Latin America (382) Ceftazidime-avibactam 32 70.2
Ceftazidime >128 40.3
Cefepime >16 38.5
Piperacillin-tazobactam >128 29.1
Doripenem >4 7.6
Meropenem >8 0
Imipenem >8 5.0
Colistin 1 99.0
Amikacin >32 56.8
Levofloxacin >4 30.1
Middle East/Africa (174) Ceftazidime-avibactam 64 67.8
Ceftazidime 128 48.3
Cefepime >16 42.5
Piperacillin-tazobactam >128 31.6
Doripenem >4 9.8
Meropenem >8 0
Imipenem >8 3.5
Colistin 1 98.9
Amikacin >32 66.1
Levofloxacin >4 39.1
a

Colistin was tested in the presence of a final concentration of 0.002% polysorbate 80.

b

Values are based on CLSI breakpoints, except for ceftazidime-avibactam, for which FDA breakpoints were used.

DISCUSSION

The activity of ceftazidime-avibactam was assessed against 7,062 P. aeruginosa isolates from clinics in four geographic regions over the period 2012 to 2014. The proportion of isolates susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam was 92.0%, in comparison to 77.0% being susceptible to ceftazidime alone. Hence, avibactam restored susceptibility to ceftazidime for 1,064 of 1,627 ceftazidime-nonsusceptible isolates (65.4%). For the majority of these ceftazidime-nonsusceptible, ceftazidime-avibactam-susceptible isolates (615 out of 709 tested), none of the bla genes tested for could be detected, and nonsusceptibility was inferred to result from hyperproduction of the chromosomally encoded AmpC, although no tests were performed to assess stable derepression of bla genes or porin expression levels. This would be consistent with the observed activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against P. aeruginosa characterized as stably derepressed for production of AmpC (10, 11).

The MIC90 for ceftazidime-avibactam was 8 μg/ml for isolates of P. aeruginosa from Europe, Asia/South Pacific, and Middle East/Africa and one doubling dilution higher for isolates from Latin America, where the susceptibility rate was 88.7%. These results are in agreement with previous surveillance studies of ceftazidime-avibactam on randomly selected clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa from Canada, China, the United States, and several European countries that reported MIC90 values of 4 to 8 μg/ml, with >90% of isolates susceptible (1621, 23, 24). In all cases, the in vitro susceptibility of unselected isolates was greater to ceftazidime-avibactam than to meropenem, with the latter compound used as an “index” carbapenem (imipenem was used in one example where meropenem was not studied [17]).

In all regions, ceftazidime-avibactam was active against a proportion of ceftazidime-nonsusceptible (56.8 to 68.9% susceptible) and meropenem-nonsusceptible (67.8 to 74.2% susceptible) subsets of P. aeruginosa isolates. Together with amikacin and colistin, ceftazidime-avibactam retained the highest percentages of susceptibility against these subgroups of isolates. Similar percentages of ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility were reported for such isolates collected in Canada, where ceftazidime-avibactam MIC values were ≤8 μg/ml for 66.1% of ceftazidime-resistant isolates and for 62.5% of meropenem-resistant isolates (16). Higher percentages of ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility were reported among ceftazidime-nonsusceptible (80.9 to 82.1%) and meropenem-nonsusceptible (86.5 to 87.3%) isolates of P. aeruginosa from the United States (19, 21). These varied results highlight the importance of understanding, if possible, the makeup and underlying resistance mechanisms of selected subpopulations of isolates identified on the basis of phenotype or genotype, compared to a population of randomly selected clinical isolates. For example, there have been three studies of the activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against specific resistant subpopulations of P. aeruginosa (2729). In these studies, it was convenient to summarize the subpopulations of isolates in terms of their 90th percentile MIC values. However, although these were abbreviated “MIC90,” it is important to distinguish them from the MIC90 obtained with a collection of randomly selected clinical isolates as is undertaken in surveillance (Table 1) (1621, 23, 24), because the latter represents an estimate of the susceptibility of the contemporary clinical bacterial population (which the MIC90s of the various selected resistant subpopulations do not do).

Carbapenem-nonsusceptible isolates were subjected to bla gene analysis. In agreement with other studies, very few acquired bla genes were found, 49.6% of which were blaVIM-2 (6, 7). Of the 563 ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant isolates identified in this study, 51.7% were metallo-β-lactamase positive and 13.0% carried genes for serine β-lactamases (KPC, SHV, VEB, PER, GES). Further work to understand the mechanism of resistance in such serine-β-lactamase-harboring isolates is needed. In 199 (35.3%) of ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant isolates, no acquired β-lactamase gene could be identified, implying either non-β-lactamase-mediated resistance mechanisms or the presence of bla genes not included in the molecular characterization protocol.

In conclusion, the in vitro behavior of ceftazidime-avibactam against P. aeruginosa, yielding percentages of susceptibility higher than those of other β-lactams tested, similar to those of amikacin, but lower than those of colistin, supports an ongoing clinical trial of this agent in patients with nosocomial pneumonia, including ventilated patients (41).

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank all INFORM participants for their contributions to the program.

This study at International Health Management Associates, Inc. (IHMA) was supported by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, which also included compensation fees for services in relation to preparing the manuscript. W. Nichols and B. de Jonge are former and current employees of AstraZeneca, respectively. W. Nichols was an AstraZeneca shareholder at the time of this study. B. de Jonge is an AstraZeneca shareholder. J. Karlowsky, K. Kazmierczak, and D. Sahm are employees of IHMA. None of the IHMA authors have personal financial interests in the sponsor of this paper.

Funding Statement

This investigation was funded by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals as part of the INFORM Global Surveillance Program. The sponsor approved the overall study design. All investigative sites were recruited and study supplies were provided by IHMA, Inc. Analysis of the final MIC and molecular data were performed by IHMA, Inc.

Footnotes

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00220-16.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Williams KJ. 2009. Why monotherapy? J Antimicrob Chemother 63(Suppl 1):i18–i20. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Klein NC, Cunha BA. 1995. Third-generation cephalosporins. Med Clin North Am 79:705–719. doi: 10.1016/S0025-7125(16)30034-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Livermore DM, Yang YJ. 1987. β-Lactamase lability and inducer power of newer β-lactam antibiotics in relation to their activity against β-lactamase-inducibility mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Infect Dis 155:775–782. doi: 10.1093/infdis/155.4.775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Livermore DM. 2002. Multiple mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: our worst nightmare? Clin Infect Dis 34:634–640. doi: 10.1086/338782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Alvarez-Ortega C, Wiegand I, Olivares J, Hancock REW, Martínez JL. 2010. Genetic determinants involved in the susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to β-lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:4159–4167. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00257-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Edelstein MV, Skleenova EN, Shevchenko OV, D'Souza JW, Tapalski DV, Azizov IS, Sukhorukova MV, Pavlukov RA, Kozlov RS, Toleman MA, Walsh TR. 2013. Spread of extensively resistant VIM-2-positive ST235 Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Russia: a longitudinal epidemiological and clinical study. Lancet Infect Dis 13:867–876. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70168-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cabot G, Ocampo-Sosa AA, Domínguez MA, Gago JF, Juan C, Tubau F, Rodríguez C, Moyà B, Peña C, Martínez-Martínez L, Oliver A on behalf of the Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI). 2012. Genetic markers of widespread extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa high-risk clones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:6349–6257. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01388-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ehmann DE, Jahić H, Ross PL, Gu R-F, Hu J, Durand-Réville TF, Lahiri S, Thresher J, Livchak S, Gao N, Palmer T, Walkup GK, Fisher SL. 2013. Kinetics of avibactam inhibition against Class A, C, and D β-lactamases. J Biol Chem 288:27960–27971. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.485979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Stachyra T, Pechereau M-C, Bruneau J-M, Claudon M, Frère J-M, Miossec C, Coleman K, Black MT. 2010. Mechanistic studies of the inactivation of TEM-1 and P99 by NXL104, a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:5132–5138. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00568-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mushtaq S, Warner M, Livermore DM. 2010. In vitro activity of ceftazidime + NXL104 against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other non-fermenters. J Antimicrob Chemother 65:2376–2381. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lahiri SD, Johnstone MR, Ross PL, McLaughlin RE, Olivier NB, Alm RA. 2014. Avibactam and class C β-lactamases: mechanism of inhibition, conservation of the binding pocket, and implications for resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:5704–5713. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03057-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Keepers TR, Gomez M, Celeri C, Nichols WW, Krause KM. 2014. Bactericidal activity, absence of serum effect, and time-kill kinetics of ceftazidime-avibactam against β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:5297–5305. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02894-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Crandon JL, Schuck VJ, Banevicius MA, Beaudoin ME, Nichols WW, Tanudra MA, Nicolau DP. 2012. Comparative in vitro and in vivo efficacies of human simulated doses of ceftazidime and ceftazidime-avibactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:6137–6146. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00851-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Housman ST, Crandon JL, Nichols WW, Nicolau DP. 2014. Efficacies of ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftazidime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a murine lung infection model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:1365–1371. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02161-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Berkhout J, Melchers MJ, van Mil AC, Seyedmousavi S, Lagarde CM, Schuck VJ, Nichols WW, Mouton JW. 2016. Pharmacodynamics of ceftazidime and avibactam in neutropenic mice with thigh or lung infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:368–375. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01269-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Walkty A, DeCorby M, Lagacé-Wiens PR, Karlowsky JA, Hoban DJ, Zhanel GG. 2011. In vitro activity of ceftazidime combined with NXL104 versus Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates obtained from patients in Canadian hospitals (CANWARD 2009 study). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:2992–2994. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01696-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Levasseur P, Girard AM, Claudon M, Goossens H, Black MT, Coleman K, Miossec C. 2012. In vitro antibacterial activity of the ceftazidime-avibactam (NXL104) combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:1606–1608. doi: 10.1128/AAC.06064-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Flamm RK, Stone GG, Sader HS, Jones RN, Nichols WW. 2014. Avibactam reverts the ceftazidime MIC90 of European Gram-negative bacterial clinical isolates to the epidemiological cut-off value. J Chemother 26:333–338. doi: 10.1179/1973947813Y.0000000145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sader HS, Castanheira M, Flamm RK, Farrell DJ, Jones RN. 2014. Antimicrobial activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against Gram-negative organisms collected from U.S. medical centers in 2012. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:1684–1692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang X, Zhang F, Zhao C, Wang Z, Nichols WW, Testa R, Li H, Chen H, He W, Wang Q, Wang H. 2014. In vitro activities of ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam against 372 Gram-negative bacilli collected in 2011 and 2012 from 11 teaching hospitals in China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:1774–1778. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02123-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sader HS, Castanheira M, Mendes RE, Flamm RK, Farrell DJ, Jones RN. 2015. Ceftazidime-avibactam activity against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated in U.S. medical centers in 2012 and 2013. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:3656–3659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sader HS, Castanheira M, Farrell DJ, Flamm RK, Jones RN. 2015. Ceftazidime-avibactam activity when tested against ceftazidime-nonsusceptible Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., Serratia marcescens, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from United States medical centers (2011-2014). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 83:389–394. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Testa R, Cantón R, Giani T, Nichols WW, Seifert H, Stefanik D, Rossolini GM, Nordmann P. 2015. In vitro activity of ceftazidime, ceftaroline and aztreonam alone and in combination with avibactam against European Gram-negative and Gram-positive clinical isolates. Int J Antimicrob Agents 45:641–646. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.12.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Huband MD, Castanheira M, Flamm RK, Farrell DJ, Jones RN, Sader HS. 2016. In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against contemporary Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from U.S. medical centers by census region, 2014. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:2537–2541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Forest Pharmaceuticals. 2015. Avycaz: ceftazidime-avibactam prescribing information. Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cincinnati, OH. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lahiri SD, Walkup GK, Whiteaker JD, Palmer T, McCormack K, Tanudra MA, Nash TJ, Thresher J, Johnstone MR, Hajec L, Livchak S, McLaughlin RE, Alm RA. 2015. Selection and molecular characterization of ceftazidime/avibactam resistant-mutants in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains containing derepressed AmpC. J Antimicrob Chemother 70:1650–1658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Berkhout J, Melchers MJ, van Mil AC, Nichols WW, Mouton JW. 2015. In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam combination in in vitro checkerboard assays. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:1138–1144. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04146-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chalhoub H, Tunney M, Elborn JS, Vergison A, Denis O, Plésiat P, Kahl BC, Van Bambeke F, Tulkens PM. 2015. Avibactam confers susceptibility to a large proportion of ceftazidime-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates recovered from cystic fibrosis patients. J Antimicrob Chermother 70:1596–1598. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Winkler ML, Papp-Wallace KM, Hujer AM, Domitrovic N, Hujer KM, Hurless KN, Tuohy M, Hall G, Bonomo RA. 2015. Unexpected challenges in treating multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam in archived isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:1020–1029. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04238-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bouchillon S, Hoban D, Hackel M, Badal R, Morrissey I, Nichols WW. 2014. Abstr 24th Eur Congr Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, abstr P1782. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Biedenbach D, de Jonge B, Nichols WW, Sahm DF. 2015. Abstr 25th Eur Congr Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, abstr P1294. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hackel M, Stone G, de Jonge BLM, Sahm DF. 2016. Abstr 26th Eur Congr Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, abstr P0297. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sahm D, Morrissey I, Nichols WW. 2014. Abstr 54th Intersci Conf Antimicrob Agents Chemother, abstr C-768. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2015. M100-S25. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 25th informational supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2015. M07-A10. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard, 10th ed Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sader HS, Rhomberg PR, Flamm RK, Jones RN. 2012. Use of a surfactant (polysorbate 80) to improve MIC susceptibility testing results for polymyxin B and colistin. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 74:412–414. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.08.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lob SH, Kazmierczak KM, Badal RE, Hackel MA, Bouchillon SK, Biedenbach DJ, Sahm DF. 2015. Trends in susceptibility of Escherichia coli from intra-abdominal infections to ertapenem and comparators in the United States according to data from the SMART program, 2009 to 2013. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:3606–3610. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05186-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Woodford N, Ellington MJ, Coelho JM, Turton JF, Ward ME, Brown S, Amyes SG, Livermore DM. 2006. Multiplex PCR for genes encoding prevalent OXA carbapenemases in Acinetobacter spp. Int J Antimicrob Agents 27:351–353. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Strateva T, Yordanov D. 2009. Pseudomonas aeruginosa—a phenomenon of bacterial resistance. J Med Microbiol 58:1133–1148. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.009142-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Livermore DM, Mushtaq S, Warner M, Zhang J, Maharjan S, Doumith M, Woodford N. 2011. Activities of NXL104 combinations with ceftazidime and aztreonam against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:390–394. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00756-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.AstraZeneca. 2015. A study comparing ceftazidime-avibactam versus meropenem in hospitalized adults with nosocomial pneumonia. Available from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01808092 Accessed 11 November 2015.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES