Abstract
Tryptophan dendrimers that inhibit HIV replication by binding to the HIV envelope glycoproteins gp120 and gp41 have unexpectedly also proven to be potent, specific, and selective inhibitors of the replication of the unrelated enterovirus A71. Dendrimer 12, a consensus compound that was synthesized on the basis of the structure-activity relationship analysis of this series, is 3-fold more potent against the BrCr lab strain and, surprisingly, inhibits a large panel of clinical isolates in the low-nanomolar/high-picomolar range.
TEXT
Enterovirus A71 (EV71) is a small virus (∼30 nm) with a single-stranded positive-sense RNA genome of ∼7.4 kb that belongs to the genus Enterovirus of the family Picornaviridae (1, 2). EV71 is the etiologic agent of hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD), a mild syndrome that most frequently affects children younger than 6 years and that is characterized by the development of fever with skin vesicles on the palms and feet, as well as ulcers on the oral mucosa (3). Unlike other HFMD-associated enteroviruses, EV71 can also cause severe neurological problems, such as aseptic meningitis and brain stem encephalitis, which can lead to cardiopulmonary failure and death (4–6). After having suffered from such neurological complications, survivors often have permanent neurological sequelae, such as delayed neurodevelopment, reduced cognitive function, and polio-like paralysis (7). Similar to other human enteroviruses, such as poliovirus, transmission of EV71 occurs through the fecal-oral route (8).
In recent years, large outbreaks of EV71 have been reported throughout the world, and they have been particularly severe in the Pacific region of Asia, with a high number of fatal cases among children (9–11). So far, there is no drug on the market to treat or prevent this infection. An inactivated EV71 vaccine was recently approved in China (12), but it may induce only limited cross-neutralization between EV71 genogroups, which does not make it suitable for widespread use.
Recently, we reported on the anti-HIV activity of a dendrimer family containing different central scaffolds and multiple (9 to 18) peripheral tryptophan (Trp) groups (Fig. 1, compounds 1 to 11) that are linked to the dendrimer branches through an amino group. These compounds were shown to inhibit an early step in the replication cycle of HIV by interacting with glycoproteins gp120 and gp41 of the HIV envelope (13). Further exploration in virus-cell-based assays for broad-spectrum antiviral activity against other viruses (herpes simplex viruses 1 and 2, vaccinia virus, varicella-zoster virus, vesicular stomatitis virus, respiratory syncytial virus, reovirus 1, Sindbis virus, Punta Toro virus, cytomegalovirus, influenza virus A [subtypes H1N1 and H3N2], influenza virus B, feline coronavirus, and feline herpes virus) did not reveal any inhibitory activity, except when evaluated against EV71, a virus whose structure and mechanism of replication are completely different than those of HIV. This unexpected and intriguing observation prompted us to investigate in more detail the anti-EV71 activity of this dendrimer family.
FIG 1.
Structures of dendrimers 1 through 12.
Dendrimers 1 through 11 (Fig. 1) were first evaluated for selective antiviral activity (50% effective concentration [EC50]) against the BrCr lab strain of EV71 in a virus-cell-based assay on rhabdomyosarcoma (RD) cells, which are known for their high susceptibility to EV71-induced cell death (14). Toxicity (50% cytotoxic concentration [CC50]) was also assessed in a similar assay setup with treated uninfected cells. Table 1 summarizes the results of these evaluations. The capsid binder pirodavir was included as a reference (15, 16). While the antiviral activity against HIV was in the 2.2 to 16 μM range, slightly better activity was observed (0.8 to 14 μM) for EV71.
TABLE 1.
Antiviral activity of dendrimers against the BrCr lab strain of EV71 in RD cellsa
Compound | EC50 (μM) | CC50 (μM) | SI |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 10 ± 1b | >37 | >3.7 |
2 | 3.5 ± 0.3b | 45 ± 2b | 13 |
3 | 3.9 ± 0.2b | 67 ± 1b | 17 |
4 | >39 | 90 ± 2b | ND |
5 | 0.9 ± 0.1b | >38 | >42 |
6 | 0.8 ± 0.1b | 28 ± 13b | 35 |
7 | 1.9 ± 0.1b | 32 ± 1b | 17 |
8 | 14 ± 1b | 22 ± 1b | 1.5 |
9 | >120 | >120 | ND |
10 | >98 | >98 | ND |
11 | >48 | 48.0 ± 0.2b | ND |
12 | 0.29 ± 0.07b | 30.0 ± 2.5b | 103 |
14 | 42 ± 7b | 117 ± 2b | 2.8 |
Pirodavir | 0.3 ± 0.1b | >54 | >180 |
All values are a summary of multiple dose-response curves (>2) from multiple independent (>1) experiments. CC50, concentration of compound at which a 50% reduction in cell viability is observed; EC50, concentration of compound at which the virus-induced cytopathic effect is reduced by 50%; SI, selectivity index (CC50/EC50); ND, not determined.
Following microscopic quality control, at least at one concentration of compound, no virus-induced cell death was observed, and the compound did not cause an adverse effect on the host cell or monolayer morphology.
Study of the structure-activity relationship (SAR) led to the following conclusions: (i) the absence of Trp on the periphery is detrimental for anti-EV71 activity (“nude acids” 10 and 11 were inactive at EC50s of >98 and >48 μM, respectively); (ii) multivalent presentation of Trp is important for anti-EV71 activity (compound 9, with only three Trp residues, is inactive, while its respective superior analog, 5, with nine Trp residues is active); (iii) the presence of 9 or 12 Trp residues on the periphery is sufficient for anti-EV71 activity (compound 6, with 12 Trp residues, was more active than compounds 7 and 8, with 15 and 18 Trp residues, respectively); and (iv) the flexibility of the central scaffold does not appear to have a pronounced impact on antiviral activity (compounds 1 and 2, with triethylbenzene and benzene rigid cores, respectively, showed activity similar to that of compound 3, with a more flexible cyclohexane core). Interestingly, the SAR that is described here for EV71 is very similar to that previously reported for HIV (13).
To take a next step in the exploration of the structure-activity relationship of this class of compounds, compound 12, which has a central pentaerythritol scaffold and 12 Trp residues on the periphery, was synthesized (Fig. 1). This compound was prepared using a strategy similar to that described by Rivero-Buceta et al. (13).
Compound 12 proved to be 3-fold more active (EC50, 0.29 μM) than compounds 5 and 6 (EC50s, 0.9 and 0.8 μM, respectively), the most active compounds among dendrimers 1 through 11, and equally as active as pirodavir, the reference compound (Table 1). Compound 12 also has the highest selectivity index (SI of 103) of the dendrimer series.
Subsequently, the antiviral activity of compound 12 was evaluated in virus-cell-based assays against a panel of representative enteroviruses (Table 2). Some, but less pronounced, antiviral activity was detected against echovirus 11 (ECHO11) and enterovirus D68 (EV-D68), which indicates that this compound is a quite specific inhibitor of the replication of EV71.
TABLE 2.
Evaluation of the broad-spectrum antiviral effect of compound 12 against a representative panel of enteroviruses
Species | Virus | Host cell | EC50 (μM)a |
---|---|---|---|
Enterovirus A | Enterovirus A71 BrCr strain | RD | 0.29 ± 0.07b |
Enterovirus B | Coxsackievirus B3 Nancy strain | Vero Ac | >28 |
Echovirus 11 Gregory strain | BGMd | 1.3 ± 0.2b | |
Enterovirus C | Poliovirus 1 Sabin strain | BGM | >28 |
Enterovirus D | Enterovirus D68 CU70 strain | HeLa Rh | 6.0 ± 2.1b |
Rhinovirus A | Rhinovirus 2 | HeLa Rh | >28 |
Rhinovirus B | Rhinovirus 14 | HeLa Rh | >28 |
All values were obtained from multiple (>2) independent (>1) experiments.
Following microscopic quality control, at least at one concentration of compound, no virus-induced cell death was observed, and the compound did not cause an adverse effect on the host cell or monolayer morphology.
Vero cells, African green monkey kidney cells (18).
BGM, Buffalo green monkey cells (19).
Finally, the antiviral potency of compound 12 was also evaluated in virus-cell-based assays against a large panel of clinical EV71 isolates with strains that belong to different clusters (A, B5, C2, and C4). Strikingly, compound 12 proved to be a 250- to 3,800-fold more potent inhibitor of the replication of these viruses than the BrCr lab strain (Table 3), with EC50s in the low-nanomolar/high-picomolar range. To determine at which stage of the virus replication cycle the compound acts, a time-of-drug-addition study was performed in which the capsid binder pirodavir and the 3C protease inhibitor rupintrivir were indicated on reference compounds (Fig. 2) (15, 17). Similar to results for pirodavir, clear inhibition of virus replication was observed only when the drug was added during or before infection. Both compound 12 and pirodavir lost their moderate activity when added after the infection period. This is in line with the observations that the compounds inhibit HIV entry. The viral 3C protease inhibitor rupintrivir lost its activity when added 6 or 7 h after infection, which is in line with its mechanism of action.
TABLE 3.
Evaluation of the broad-spectrum antiviral effects of compound 12 against a representative panel of clinical EV71 isolates in RD cells
EV71 genogroup | Virus strain | EC50 (nM)a |
---|---|---|
A | BrCr | 285 ± 70 |
B5 | TW/70811/08 | 0.181 ± 0.020 |
TW/70886/08 | 0.097 ± 0.039 | |
TW/70902/08 | 0.233 ± 0.081 | |
TW/96002/08 | 0.362 ± 0.081 | |
TW/96016/08 | 0.166 ± 0.055 | |
TW/96022/08 | 0.126 ± 0.040 | |
11316 | 0.385 ± 0.016 | |
C2 | H08300 461 | 1.121 ± 0.335 |
H08300 496 | 0.191 ± 0.040 | |
H08326 456 | 0.181 ± 0.032 | |
C4 | TW/2728/04 | 0.075 ± 0.003 |
TW/2429/04 | 0.301 ± 0.216 | |
TW/2639/04 | 0.079 ± 0.011 | |
TW/2815/04 | 0.158 ± 0.017 | |
TW/2824/04 | 0.400 ± 0.053 | |
TW/2871/04 | 0.226 ± 0.134 | |
TW/71595/04 | 0.666 ± 0.193 | |
TW/72232/04 | 0.199 ± 0.004 | |
TW/1956/05 | 0.229 ± 0.175 | |
TW/71428/05 | 0.301 ± 0.166 |
All values were obtained from multiple (>2) independent (>1) experiments. Following microscopic quality control, at least at one concentration of compound, no virus-induced cell death was observed, and the compound did not cause an adverse effect on the host cell or monolayer morphology.
FIG 2.
Effects of pirodavir (capsid binder), rupintrivir (3C protease inhibitor), and compound 12 in a time-of-drug-addition assay.
It can be hypothesized that the mechanism of action in the context of EV71 will most involve a glycosylated protein on the host cell surface because of the following: (i) the structures of the two viruses (HIV and EV71) are very different, (ii) the difference in potencies against the clinical isolates versus the laboratory strain is striking, and (iii) the EV71 virion lacks (in contrast to HIV) glycosylated proteins on its surface This is currently being explored further.
In summary, a novel class of potent, selective, specific, and early-stage inhibitors of enterovirus A71 replication has been discovered. To consolidate the structure-activity relationship observations, a new dendrimer with a central pentaerythritol scaffold and 12 Trp residues on the periphery was synthesized. This compound proved to be exquisitely active against clinical isolates of EV71 (belonging to each of the genogroups).
Because enterovirus A71 is a virus that is transmitted through the fecal-oral route and because the molecular weight of the molecules probably would prevent them from being transferred from the gut lumen to the bloodstream following oral administration, one could envisage using this type of compound prophylactically to create a chemotherapeutical barrier in the gut to prevent infection with EV71 or using it as a topical cream to treat virus-induced lesions. However, whether additional modifications can further increase the potency of this compound to obtain a suitable candidate for proof-of-concept studies should be explored first.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work has been supported by the Spanish MINECO (Project SAF2012-39760-C02-01, cofinanced by the FEDER program; Plan Nacional de Cooperación Público-Privada; and Subprograma INNPACTO IPT-2012-0213-060000, cofinanced by the FEDER program) and the Comunidad de Madrid (BIPEDD2-CM-S2010/BMD-2457). This work was also funded by EU FP7 (FP7/2007-2013) Project EUVIRNA under Grant 408 Agreement 264286 by EU FP7 SILVER (Contract HEALTH-F3-2010-260644), a grant from the Belgian Interuniversity Attraction Poles (IAP) Phase VII–P7/45 (BELVIR), and the EU FP7 Industry-Academia Partnerships and Pathways Project AIROPICO. The Spanish MEC/MINECO is also acknowledged for a grant to E.R.-B. L.S. was funded by China Scholarship Council (CSC) Grant 201403250056.
We also acknowledge Charlotte Vanderheydt for help with the processing of the antiviral data.
This article is dedicated to the memory of Prof. Chris McGuigan.
Footnotes
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00626-16.
REFERENCES
- 1.Pourianfar HR, Grollo L. 2015. Development of antiviral agents toward enterovirus 71 infection. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 48:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2013.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ng Q, He F, Kwang J. 2015. Recent progress towards novel EV71 anti-therapeutics and vaccines. Viruses 7:6441–6457. doi: 10.3390/v7122949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chan YF, Sam IC, Wee KL, Abubakar S. 2011. Enterovirus 71 in Malaysia: a decade later. Neurol Asia 16:1–15. [Google Scholar]
- 4.LuanYin C, TzouYien L, KuangHung H, YhuChering H, KuangLin L, Chuen H, ShinRu S, HsiaoChen N, MaoSheng H, HueiShyoung W, ChinYun L. 1999. Clinical features and risk factors of pulmonary oedema after enterovirus-71-related hand, foot, and mouth disease. Lancet 354:1682–1686. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04434-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Alexander JP, Baden L, Pallansch MA, Anderson LJ. 1994. Enterovirus 71 infections and neurologic disease—United States, 1977 1991. J Infect Dis 169:905–908. doi: 10.1093/infdis/169.4.905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.McMinn PC. 2002. An overview of the evolution of enterovirus 71 and its clinical and public health significance. FEMS Microbiol Rev 26:91–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2002.tb00601.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chang LY, Lin TY, Huang YC, Tsao KC, Shih SR, Kuo ML, Ning HC, Chung PW, Kang CM. 1999. Comparison of enterovirus 71 and coxsackie-virus A16 clinical illnesses during the Taiwan enterovirus epidemic, 1998. Pediatr Infect Dis J 18:1092–1096. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199912000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chung PW, Huang YC, Chang LY, Lin TY, Ning HC. 2001. Duration of enterovirus shedding in stool. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 34:167–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chang LY, Huang LM, Gau SS, Wu YY, Hsia SH, Fan TY, Lin KL, Huang YC, Lu CY, Lin TY. 2007. Neurodevelopment and cognition in children after enterovirus 71 infection. N Engl J Med 356:1226–1234. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa065954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chen CY, Chang YC, Huang CC, Lui CC, Lee KW, Huang SC. 2001. Acute flaccid paralysis in infants and young children with enterovirus 71 infection: MR imaging findings and clinical correlates. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:200–205. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dong W, Li X, Yang P, Liao H, Wang X, Wang Q. 2016. The effects of weather factors on hand, foot and mouth disease in Beijing. Sci Rep 6:19247. doi: 10.1038/srep19247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mao QY, Wang Y, Bian L, Xu M, Liang Z. 2016. EV71 vaccine, a new tool to control outbreaks of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD). Expert Rev Vaccines 15:599–606. doi: 10.1586/14760584.2016.1138862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rivero-Buceta E, Doyagüez EG, Colomer I, Quesada E, Mathys L, Noppen S, Liekens S, Camarasa MJ, Pérez-Pérez MJ, Balzarini J. 2015. Tryptophan dendrimers that inhibit HIV replication, prevent virus entry and bind to the HIV envelope glycoproteins gp120 and gp41. Eur J Med Chem 106:34–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.10.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yamayoshi S, Yamashita Y, Li J, Hanagata N, Minowa T, Takemura T, Koike S. 2009. Scavenger receptor B2 is a cellular receptor for enterovirus 71. Nat Med 15:798–801. doi: 10.1038/nm.1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tijsma A, Franco D, Tucker S, Hilgenfeld R, Froeyen M, Leyssen P, Neyts J. 2014. The capsid binder vapendavir and the novel protease inhibitor SG85 inhibit enterovirus 71 replication. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:6990–6992. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03328-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Andries K, Dewindt B, Snoeks J, Willebrords R, Van Eemeren K, Stokbroekx R, Janssen PA. 1992. In vitro activity of pirodavir (R 77975), a substituted phenoxy-pyridazinamine with broad-spectrum antipicornaviral activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 36:100–107. doi: 10.1128/AAC.36.1.100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Thibaut HJ, Leyssen P, Puerstinger G, Muigg A, Neyts J, De Palma AM. 2011. Towards the design of combination therapy for the treatment of enterovirus infections. Antiviral Res 90:213–217. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2011.03.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kandolf R, Ameis D, Kirschner P, Canu A, Hofschneider PH. 1987. In situ detection of enteroviral genomes in myocardial cells by nucleic acid hybridization: an approach to the diagnosis of viral heart disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84:6272–6276. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.17.6272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chonmaitree T, Ford C, Sanders C, Lucia HL. 1988. Comparison of cell cultures for rapid isolation of enteroviruses. J Clin Microbiol 26:2576–2580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.