ABSTRACT
Clostridium perfringens type A is a common source of foodborne illness (FBI) in humans. Vegetative cells sporulate in the small intestinal tract and produce the major pathogenic factor C. perfringens enterotoxin. Although sporulation plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of FBI, the mechanisms inducing sporulation remain unclear. Bile salts were shown previously to induce sporulation, and we confirmed deoxycholate (DCA)-induced sporulation in C. perfringens strain NCTC8239 cocultured with human intestinal epithelial Caco-2 cells. In the present study, we performed transcriptome analyses of strain NCTC8239 in order to elucidate the mechanism underlying DCA-induced sporulation. Of the 2,761 genes analyzed, 333 were up- or downregulated during DCA-induced sporulation and included genes for cell division, nutrient metabolism, signal transduction, and defense mechanisms. In contrast, the virulence-associated transcriptional regulators (the VirR/VirS system, the agr system, codY, and abrB) were not activated by DCA. DCA markedly increased the expression of signaling molecules controlled by Spo0A, the master regulator of the sporulation process, whereas the expression of spo0A itself was not altered in the presence or absence of DCA. The phosphorylation of Spo0A was enhanced in the presence of DCA. Collectively, these results demonstrated that DCA induced sporulation, at least partially, by facilitating the phosphorylation of Spo0A and activating Spo0A-regulated genes in strain NCTC8239 while altering the expression of various genes.
IMPORTANCE Disease caused by Clostridium perfringens type A consistently ranks among the most common bacterial foodborne illnesses in humans in developed countries. The sporulation of C. perfringens in the small intestinal tract is a key event for its pathogenesis, but the factors and underlying mechanisms by which C. perfringens sporulates in vivo currently remain unclear. Bile salts, major components of bile, which is secreted from the liver for the emulsification of lipids, were shown to induce sporulation. However, the mechanisms underlying bile salt-induced sporulation have not yet been clarified. In the present study, we demonstrate that deoxycholate (one of the bile salts) induces sporulation by facilitating the phosphorylation of Spo0A and activating Spo0A-regulated genes using a transcriptome analysis. Thus, this study enhances our understanding of the mechanisms underlying sporulation, particularly that of bile salt-induced sporulation, in C. perfringens.
INTRODUCTION
Clostridium perfringens, a Gram-positive spore-forming anaerobic bacterium, is highly prevalent in the intestinal tracts of humans and animals and also in nature, such as in soil, sewage, and rivers (1, 2). This bacterium has been identified as a major pathogen in foodborne illness (FBI) and consistently ranks among the most common bacterial FBI in the United States, United Kingdom, and Japan (1, 3, 4). Therefore, controlling this FBI is a critical issue from a public health perspective. FBI occurs when contaminated food materials are undercooked and/or held at improper temperatures, thereby allowing heat-resistant spores to germinate and grow (5). After the ingestion of contaminated foods, vegetative cells sporulate in the small intestinal tract (6). During sporulation, bacterial cells produce C. perfringens enterotoxin (CPE), which binds to its receptor on epithelial cells, damages the intestinal epithelium, and results in diarrhea and abdominal cramping (7–11). Thus, the sporulation of C. perfringens is a key event for its pathogenesis. Since bacteria generally differentiate or sporulate in response to environmental factors, these factors need to be clarified and the underlying mechanisms regulating this process at the infection site elucidated. However, the factors triggering C. perfringens sporulation in vivo currently remain unclear.
Bile salts are major components of bile and are secreted from the liver for the emulsification and solubilization of lipids (12, 13). Primary bile salts, which are composed mainly of cholate and chenodeoxycholate, are synthesized in the liver from cholesterol and conjugate with either glycine or taurine before they are secreted. They can be modified to form secondary bile salts (deoxycholate [DCA] and lithocholate) by intestinal bacterial enzymes. Most secreted bile salts are absorbed by passive diffusion along the entire gut and by active transport in the distal ileum (12). Bile salts are well-known regulatory molecules for the activation of nuclear receptors and cell-signaling pathways in mammalian cells (14). Previous studies showed that enteric pathogens possess machineries for resistance to bile in order to survive in the gastrointestinal tract (15, 16) and use bile as an environmental signal for their invasion into the host (17–20). Since C. perfringens has inherent bile tolerance (21), bile salts may be used as enteric environmental cues for C. perfringens in order to establish infection in the intestinal tract. Bile and bile salts have been shown to accelerate sporulation in C. perfringens strains (22–24). We recently confirmed DCA-induced sporulation in C. perfringens strain NCTC8239 cocultured with human intestinal epithelial Caco-2 cells (25). However, the mechanisms underlying bile salt-induced sporulation have not yet been clarified.
Morphogenesis and gene regulation during spore formation have been extensively investigated for Bacillus spp. (26, 27). Entry into the sporulation pathway is governed by Spo0A, a member of the response regulator family. Spo0A is phosphorylated via a phosphorelay comprised of several kinases and intermediaries (Spo0F and Spo0B) in predivisional cells (sporulation stage 0) to become active. Spo0A∼P dimerizes and promotes the transcription of genes involved in activating downstream molecules, including the forespore- and mother cell-specific sigma factors σF and σE, respectively (stage II). The proteins regulated by these sigma factors in turn control inter- and intracompartment communication between the prespore and/or mother cell during the engulfment and formation of protoplasts (stage III). After the spore cell wall, cortex, and coat have formed (stages IV to V), the spore matures (stage VI) and then is released from the lysed mother cell (stage VII). Transcriptional analyses revealed that the sporulation cascades in clostridia share many common features with those in Bacillus spp. (28–32); however, many differences also have been identified. For example, the genes for Spo0F and Spo0B involved in the Spo0A phosphorelay system in Bacillus spp. are hardly conserved in clostridia (33); thus, Spo0A appears to be directly phosphorylated by histidine kinases in several clostridia (34–36). The conserved gene products involved in sporulation, such as oligopeptide permeases, have different functions in bacilli and clostridia (37). Furthermore, Xiao et al. (32) recently revealed previously unidentified putative sporulation genes in C. perfringens FBI strain SM101 using a whole-genome microarray analysis during its sporulation process. Thus, the detailed mechanism underlying sporulation in clostridia remains unclear. In the present study, we performed a transcriptome analysis on C. perfringens FBI strain NCTC8239 during DCA-induced sporulation in an attempt to identify genes involved in a sporulation cascade specifically activated by DCA. We then compared the identified candidate genes with the findings of previous transcriptome analyses during the sporulation of clostridia and bacilli (29–32, 38) and classified common features and DCA-specific responses. It is noteworthy that the phosphorylation of Spo0A was facilitated in the presence of DCA, leading to the upregulation of several Spo0A-controlled genes. The possible mechanisms regulating the DCA-induced sporulation of C. perfringens are discussed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains and growth conditions.
The type A FBI outbreak strain C. perfringens NCTC8239 was purchased from the National Collection of Type Cultures. C. perfringens type A strain SM101 (an electroporatable derivative of FBI strain NCTC8798) was kindly provided by Tohru Shimizu (Kanazawa University). The spo0A null mutant of SM101, IH101, was prepared as described previously (39). In order to achieve sporulation, bacteria were inoculated into fluid thioglycolate (FTG; BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ) medium and incubated anaerobically in an anaerobic jar (AnaeroPack system; Mitsubishi Gas Chemical, Tokyo, Japan) at 37°C for 18 h. One milliliter of the bacterial culture was passaged into 10 ml Duncan-Strong (DS) medium (40) and cultured at 37°C for 24 h. One milliliter of the culture then was heated at 75°C for 20 min, passaged into 10 ml of fresh DS medium, and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The heat treatment and passages were repeated until the number of spores observed by phase-contrast microscopy was greater than half the total number of bacteria (25). These bacterial cells were heated and stored at −80°C with glycerol (final concentration, 20%) for future use.
Coculture study.
Bacteria were cocultured with human intestinal epithelial Caco-2 cells as described previously (25), but with slight modifications. Briefly, Caco-2 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Cells were seeded on a 24-well plate (1.3 × 105 cells per well) and incubated for 4 days. Just before the inoculation of bacteria, Caco-2 cells were washed using phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) three times and incubated in 1 ml glucose-negative DMEM [DMEM(−); Life Science Technologies, Carlsbad, CA] supplemented with 0.4% starch and 50 μM DCA (Wako, Osaka, Japan). NCTC8239 was precultured in FTG anaerobically at 37°C for 18 h. Cultures were washed with PBS twice, and 100 μl of the bacterial culture (1 × 107 to 5 × 107 CFU per ml) then was inoculated into Caco-2 cells and incubated in the CO2 incubator at 37°C. The number of viable vegetative cells was determined by plating serially diluted samples onto brain heart infusion (BHI) agar, incubating at 37°C for 24 h under anaerobic conditions, and calculating CFU. The number of heat-resistant spores was counted by plating heat-treated cultures onto BHI agar. The detection threshold was 200 CFU/ml.
Fluorescence staining.
Bacterial cultures were centrifuged at 400 × g for 5 min, and the pellets were double stained with rhodamine B (Life Science Technologies) and Hoechst 33342 (Life Science Technologies) for cell membrane and double-stranded DNA, respectively (41). Stained cells were observed under a phase-contrast microscope with fluorescence accessories (Nikon ECLIPSE 80i; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).
RNA extraction.
Total RNA was extracted as described previously (25) but with slight modifications. Bacterial cultures containing 2 × 107 CFU of C. perfringens with detached Caco-2 cells were treated with RNAprotect bacterial reagent (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. After centrifugation at 5,000 × g for 10 min, the pellets were washed with SET buffer (25% sucrose, 50 mM EDTA [pH 8.0], and 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0]) at 5,000 × g for 10 min. The pellets, which were suspended in GTC buffer (4 M guanidine thiocyanate, 0.5% Na N-lauryl sarcosine, 25 mM sodium citrate [pH 7.0], and 0.1 M β-mercaptoethanol), were homogenized by being passed three times through a 21-gauge needle to disrupt Caco-2 cell membranes. After centrifugation at 5,000 × g for 10 min to recover the bacterial cells, the pellets were washed with SET buffer once. The bacterial cells were lysed by being suspended in 100 μl SET buffer with 20 mg/ml lysozyme (Sigma) and 100 μg/ml proteinase K (Roche Applied Science, Upper Bavaria, Germany) at 37°C for 30 min. After this incubation, they were transferred into a tube containing zirconia beads (Easy Beads; AMR, Gifu, Japan), vortexed for 5 min, and centrifuged at 21,130 × g for 5 min. Total RNA was extracted from the supernatants using TRI Reagent LS (Sigma) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Custom chip design.
Hassan et al. (42) previously reported that NCTC8239 encoded 3,068 genes that translated to 2,784 proteins. From the NCBI database, we acquired 2,778 coding sequences from the 55 contigs of NCTC8239 (GenBank accession number ABDY00000000.1; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_ABDY00000000.1) (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). We designed a DNA probe utilizing eArray provided by Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA) (http://www.chem-agilent.com/contents.php?id=29443) with these coding sequences. We acquired 2,778 probes with information for probe length, melting point (Tm), the distance from the 3′ terminus, %GC, score for probe quality on the base composition, and possible cross-hybridization against other positions in NCTC8239 and the genome of Homo sapiens (see Tables S1 and S2). Since the whole-genome sequence has not been completed for NCTC8239, we also determined whether the probes hybridized more than two positions in SM101 and C. perfringens ATCC 13124, the entire genome of which has been sequenced. Nucleotide homologies within the core genomic regions (the portion of the genome conserved among all taxa) for NCTC8239 were 99.0% and 97.8% in ATCC 13124 and SM101, respectively (42). The score for probe quality was divided into six grades (1 to 5 and poor). A lower score indicated that the probe had better quality. Every probe acquired had a score of 1 or 2. Therefore, we considered all probes to have sufficient qualities for use in microarrays on the base composition (see Table S1). In contrast, since 17 probes were likely to cross-hybridize with an unintended gene (see Table S2), we removed these probes for a microarray analysis. Therefore, a custom 8 × 15,000 oligonucleotide array containing 60-mer oligonucleotide probes for 2,761 genes in NCTC8239, two bacterial control genes (16S rRNA and 23S rRNA), and three human control genes (beta-2-microglobulin, glucuronidase beta, and 18S rRNA) was ordered from Agilent Technologies (design identifier 045370). Each probe was spotted 5-fold on each microarray.
Microarray.
Gene expression analyses using an Agilent-045370 C. perfringens strain NCTC8239 8 × 15,000 array (Agilent), listed with the corresponding GEO accession number (GPL20295), were performed as one-color experiments. In order to efficiently remove most genomic DNA contamination without a DNase treatment, extracted total RNA was purified with an RNeasy MinElute cleanup kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The integrity of total RNA was confirmed using the RNA 6000 Nano LabChip kit on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent), and only samples with an RNA integrity number (RIN) greater than 6.0 were used in the microarray analysis. Total RNA (100 ng) was reverse transcribed into double-stranded cDNA with oligo(dT) and random primers using AffinityScript multiple-temperature reverse transcriptase (Agilent). The resulting cDNAs were labeled with cyanine-3-labeled cytosine triphosphate (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA) using an Agilent low-input quick amp WT labeling kit (Agilent). After the labeled cRNAs had been fragmented, each cRNA sample (600 ng) was hybridized on an Agilent 045370 C. perfringens strain NCTC8239 8 × 15,000 array (Agilent) at 65°C for 17 h with rotation in the dark. Hybridization was performed using a gene expression hybridization kit (Agilent) by following the manufacturer's instructions. After washing, the slides were scanned with an Agilent microarray scanner (G2505C). Feature extraction software (version 10.5.1.1) was used to convert images into gene expression data. In order to filter out spots lower than the background intensity, the probes with Agilent background-subtracted signals (gIsWellAboveBG = 1) were used in an expression analysis. Microarray data were normalized with the bacterial control genes and log2 transformed, and the between-sample fold change then was calculated using the one-sample t test with Subio platform v1.15 (Subio). Each gene was annotated based on the NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/proteins/158?genome_assembly_id=159657) and PATRIC (https://www.patricbrc.org/portal/portal/patric/Home) databases.
qRT-PCR.
Total RNA was isolated from the biological samples that were separate from those used in the microarray analyses. Total RNA was treated with DNase I (RQ1 RNase-free DNase; Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA was synthesized using Superscript III reverse transcriptase (Life Science Technologies) with random primers (Life Science Technologies). Synthesized cDNA was subjected to a SYBR green real-time PCR assay (Life Science Technologies) with gene-specific forward and reverse primer sets (Table 1) using the Applied Biosystems StepOne real-time PCR system. Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) data were normalized using 16S rRNA values. All reactions were performed in triplicate.
TABLE 1.
Primers
| Primer name | Primer sequence | Gene target or function | Product size (bp) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PrMY147 | 5′-AACCAGATTTAGTTGTATTAGCTATAATTATGCC-3′ | Mutagenesis | ||
| PrMY145 | 5′-TAATACAACTAAATCTGGTTGTTTTTCTTC-3′ | Mutagenesis | ||
| PrMY67 | 5′-CATGCTATAGAGGTTGCTTG-3′ | spo0A | 98 | |
| PrMY68 | 5′-GAGTTTGTTGGTTTACCCTT-3′ | spo0A | ||
| PrMY73 | 5′-TGGATAGTTCAGGAATTGGTGTT-3′ | spoIIAA | 162 | |
| PrMY74 | 5′-GAGCTTCATCCAAATTTTCGT-3′ | spoIIAA | ||
| PrMY71 | 5′ATGAAGGATTTGCAAGGGTG-3′ | spoIIAB | 100 | |
| PrMY72 | 5′-ACAGCCTCAGAAACAGCAGTC-3′ | spoIIAB | ||
| PrMY50 | 5′-AGCCTTAGAGTCAGCAAGTAGT-3′ | sigF | 118 | |
| PrMY51 | 5′-ACCATGTCATCATCTTCACCCT-3′ | sigF | ||
| PrMY75 | 5′-TACTGGTGTAGGAGTTGAGG-3′ | sigE | 111 | |
| PrMY76 | 5′-CTTGATGCATAGGTTGCAAG-3′ | sigE | ||
| PrMY22 | 5′-CGTTCTTCTAACTCATACCCTTGG-3′ | cpe | 166 | |
| PrMY23 | 5′-CTCCATCACCTAAGGACTGTTC-3′ | cpe | ||
| PrMY217 | 5′-GTGCTACAATAGTTGGGATGGA-3′ | codY | 94 | 88 |
| PrMY218 | 5′-CCAATAGCTAATTGAACCACTGC-3′ | codY | ||
| PrMY219 | 5′-CGCAGAAAAGGATGCTTTAGA-3′ | abrB | 100 | |
| PrMY220 | 5′-AACATCTCTAGCATCTCCGCA-3′ | abrB | ||
| PrMY227 | 5′-AAATATTCTGGAGGAGCACA-3′ | agrB | 371 | 89 |
| PrMY222 | 5′-CATTGCCATGCTACTCCAAA-3′ | agrB | ||
| PrMY223 | 5′-CCACAAGGAGAATATGAGGCTT-3′ | spoIIR | 125 | |
| PrMY224 | 5′-TCATCATAGGCAACTTGTCCC-3′ | spoIIR | ||
| PrMY231 | 5′-TGCAACTGCATTGCCTGTA-3′ | spoIIGA | 179 | |
| PrMY232 | 5′-CTCTTGTCATTGTTTCCCCA-3′ | spoIIGA | ||
| PrMY44 | 5′-CGCATAATGTTGAAAGATGG-3′ | 16S rRNA | 105 | 90 |
| PrMY45 | 5′-CCTTGGTAGGCCGTTACCC-3′ | 16S rRNA |
Mutant strain construction.
The Spo0A phosphorylation site mutant (strain MY97) was prepared by complementing an spo0A null mutant with an Spo0A expression plasmid encoding a D58A (replacing Asp with Ala at position 58) nonphosphorylatable mutant. The phosphorylation site of Spo0A was predicted by the conserved protein domain family on the NCBI database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/cddsrv.cgi?uid=238088) and located at Asp58 of the REC domain in SM101. The promoter and open reading frame (ORF) region of spo0A were PCR amplified from the genomic DNA of SM101 as described previously (39) and inserted into the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega). Using this plasmid, the mutant spo0A gene encoding the mutated sequence of the phosphorylation site replacing Asp (D) with Ala (A) at amino acid position 58 was generated by site-directed mutagenesis PCR (GeneTailor site-directed mutagenesis system; Life Science Technologies) using the primer set PrMY145 and PrMY147 (Table 1). After we confirmed that the sequence was mutated correctly at amino acid position 58 by a Sanger sequencing analysis (Macrogen Japan, Tokyo, Japan), the promoter and mutated ORF region of spo0A were subcloned into the expression vector pJIR751 (43) to create pMY47. In order to construct the mutant strain MY97, pMY47 was introduced into strain IH101, the spo0A null mutant of SM101 (39), through electroporation. Transformants were selected on BHI agar containing 30 μg/ml of erythromycin. Thus, the mutant we prepared expressed the mutated Spo0A in trans by transforming the mutated expression plasmid into the spo0A-null mutant.
Detection of Spo0A phosphorylation using a Phos-tag acrylamide gel.
A Phos-tag acrylamide gel analysis was performed as described previously (44), but with slight modifications. Phos-tag acrylamide gels were prepared according to the instructions provided (Wako); 10% gels were copolymerized with 25 μM Phos-tag acrylamide and 50 μM MnCl2. The 24-ml bacterial cultures (optical density at 600 nm [OD600] of 0.4 to 0.5) collected were centrifuged at 5,000 × g at 4°C for 10 min, and the pellets were lysed with 300 μl of 1 M formic acid. They were transferred into a tube containing zirconia beads, vortexed for 4 min for complete lysis of the pellets, and centrifuged at 21,130 × g at 4°C for 3 min. The supernatants obtained were solubilized by the addition of SDS loading buffer containing β-mercaptoethanol and subsequently neutralized by the addition of 5N NaOH. Samples were stored on ice prior to loading onto Phos-tag acrylamide gels and run at 4°C. Gels were fixed for 10 min in transfer buffer with 10 mM EDTA and then washed for 10 min in transfer buffer without EDTA twice. After being transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane, the samples were probed with a rabbit polyclonal anti-Spo0A antibody (45) at 37°C for 1 h. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) then was reacted at 37°C for 1 h and detected with ECL prime Western blotting detection reagent (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom). In order to dephosphorylate Spo0A∼P, samples were heated at 100°C for 5 min.
Statistical analyses.
Data are expressed as means ± standard deviations (SD) or standard errors of the means (SEM). Statistical analyses were performed using the Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analyses for microarrays performed were as described above in the “Microarray” section.
Microarray data accession numbers.
The microarray data used in this study have been deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus database (GEO; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession number GSE69649 (see also GPL20295).
RESULTS
DCA-induced sporulation in C. perfringens strain NCTC8239.
In order to gain insights into the mechanism underlying DCA-induced sporulation in a C. perfringens FBI strain (25), we cocultured NCTC8239 with Caco-2 cells in DMEM(−) containing starch alone or starch with DCA [S/DMEM(−) or S/D/DMEM(−), respectively] in a CO2 incubator and examined the kinetics of bacterial growth and sporulation (Fig. 1). Bacterial growth was not observed in the samples culturing bacterial cells in a 24-well plate in the absence of Caco-2 cells (25) or starch (data not shown). In the absence of DCA, heat-resistant spores appeared at 8 h postinoculation (hpi), and the number of spores reached 5.0 × 103 CFU/ml by 12 hpi. The number of vegetative cells was sustained at 1.0 × 106 CFU/ml until 4 hpi but then decreased to 1.0 × 105 CFU/ml by 12 hpi. In contrast, the number of spores markedly increased (up to 1.0 × 106 CFU/ml) at 8 hpi in the presence of DCA. The number of vegetative cells was sustained at 1.0 × 106 CFU/ml during the experiment. These results were consistent with our previous findings (25) showing that the numbers of vegetative cells and spores both reached 1.0 × 106 CFU/ml at 8 hpi and were sustained until 24 hpi in S/D/DMEM(−), whereas the numbers of vegetative cells and spores in S/DMEM(−) reached 1.0 × 105 and 1.0 × 103 CFU/ml, respectively, at 8 hpi; both reached 1.0 × 104 CFU/ml at 24 hpi. SM101, a derivative of FBI strain NCTC8798, also showed that sporulation was enhanced in the presence of DCA; however, the effects of DCA were not as prominent as those in NCTC8239 (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Therefore, we selected NCTC8239 for further study. These results indicated that DCA enhanced sporulation in our coculture system.
FIG 1.

Bacterial growth and sporulation kinetics of NCTC8239 in response to DCA. NCTC8239 was cocultured with Caco-2 cells in S/DMEM(−) (diamonds) or S/D/DMEM(−) (squares) in a CO2 incubator. The number of vegetative cells (solid lines) or spores (dashed lines) was determined at 0, 4, 8, and 12 hpi by plating serially diluted unheated (for vegetative cells) or heat-treated (for heat-resistant spores) samples, respectively, on BHI agar, incubating at 37°C for 24 h under anaerobic conditions, and counting CFU. Data represent the means ± SEM from three independent experiments.
In order to determine which sporulation stage was enhanced by DCA, we analyzed bacterial morphology using fluorescence microscopy. NCTC8239 was cultured in DS medium for 2 to 8 h and stained by rhodamine B and Hoechst 33342. The stained cells were observed under the phase-contrast and fluorescence microscope and divided into eight morphological stages, as shown in Fig. 2A. During bacterial growth, we observed bacterial cells with or without symmetric membrane septation and the division of nuclei (cell division or vegetative cells, respectively). Cells with an asymmetric septum or engulfed membrane during the initial phase of sporulation were defined as stage II. Stage III featured the complete engulfment of the membrane and positive nuclear staining in prespores. Stages IV and V characterized cells containing gray endospores under the phase-contrast microscope with negative nuclear staining in prespores. Bright endospores were observed under the phase-contrast microscope at stage VI. Stage VII featured the lysis of the mother cell and positive nuclear staining around mature spores. Bright spores under the phase-contrast microscope were defined as dormant spores. When bacterial cells were cocultured with Caco-2 cells in S/DMEM(−) for 2, 4, 6, and 8 h, most of the bacterial population was in the growing cycle (cell division and vegetative cells) (Fig. 2B). In contrast, more than 40% of the bacterial population cocultured in S/D/DMEM(−) switched to the sporulation process (stages II, III, IV-V, VI, and VII and dormant spores) (Fig. 2B). The bacterial population in the sporulation process was significantly larger in S/D/DMEM(−) than in S/DMEM(−) (Fig. 2C). These results indicate that DCA stimulates the early events of sporulation, such as the activation of the master regulator Spo0A.
FIG 2.
Morphological observations of sporulation in NCTC8239 in response to DCA. (A) NCTC8239 cultured in DS medium was stained by rhodamine B and Hoechst 33342 for the cell membrane and double-stranded DNA, respectively. Samples were observed under a phase-contrast microscope with fluorescence accessories. The panels of each stage correspond to the stages defined in the sporulation of B. subtilis (87). (B) NCTC8239 was cocultured with Caco-2 cells in S/DMEM(−) or S/D/DMEM(−) and stained with rhodamine B and Hoechst 33342 at 2, 4, 6, and 8 hpi. The stained cells were divided into eight morphological stages, as shown in panel A, and counted. The total number of cells counted was more than 1,000 in each sample. Data represent the means from three independent experiments. Cell division, white; vegetative cell or stage 0, stripe; stage II, dot; stage III, oblique; stages IV to V, light gray; stage VI, medium gray; stage VII, dark gray; dormant spore, black. (C) The bacterial population in the sporulation process (stages II, III, IV-V, VI, and VII and dormant spores) was calculated in samples identical to those used for panel B in S/DMEM(−) (open bars) and S/D/DMEM(−) (solid bars). All data represent the means ± SD from three independent experiments. **, P < 0.01 [significantly different from results for S/DMEM(−)].
Transcriptome analysis of NCTC8239 during DCA-induced sporulation.
In order to understand the comprehensive gene expression pattern in NCTC8239 in response to DCA, we compared gene expression profiles in C. perfringens cells cocultured with Caco-2 cells in the presence or absence of DCA at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 12 hpi using DNA microarrays. The whole-genome sequence has not yet been completed in NCTC8239, whereas SM101 has already had its entire genome sequenced (46). Nevertheless, the genome length and number of genes and proteins were larger in NCTC8239 (3.32 kb; 3,068 genes and 2,784 proteins) than in SM101 (2.90 kb; 2,765 genes and 2,619 proteins) (42). The 2,761 coding sequences for the microarray analysis in this study covered most of the genes and proteins identified (90.00% and 99.17%, respectively). Therefore, we considered it possible to characterize most genes involving DCA-induced sporulation in NCTC8239. Microarray experiments were performed three times for each time point, and triplicate data sets were statistically analyzed (Fig. S3; also see Table S3 in the supplemental material). Genes showing at least 4-fold differential expression levels from those in samples for comparison and with a confidence level (P value) of less than 0.05 were selected and defined as differentially expressed genes. A total of 333 genes (12.06% of the genes analyzed) were differentially expressed in response to the addition of DCA in at least one time point during the experiment (see Table S4). No gene was differentially expressed at 1 or 2 hpi, whereas the expression of 7, 162, 315, and 101 genes was changed at 3, 4, 6, and 12 hpi, respectively. Of these, only one gene [AC7_0824; encoding lipoprotein, iron(III) dicitrate transport system, and periplasmic iron-binding protein FecB] was downregulated at 4 hpi, whereas all other genes were upregulated in response to the addition of DCA.
In order to identify the genes specifically induced in the presence of DCA in NCTC8239, we compared the 333 genes differentially expressed in our study with those previously elucidated as being regulated during sporulation in SM101 (32) and with Spo0A/sigma factor-regulated genes reported in C. difficile strain JIR8094 (29). We first determined the orthologs of our 333 genes with SM101 and C. difficile using blastn or blastp of a BLAST search on the NCBI database, respectively, with an E value cutoff of 0.0001 (47) (see Table S4 in the supplemental material). The ortholog of AC7_0824, which was downregulated during DCA-induced sporulation, was positively regulated during sporulation in SM101 (see Table S4). Of the 332 genes upregulated during DCA-induced sporulation, 50 genes were sporulation related in SM101 and also Spo0A/sigma factor regulated in C. difficile (Fig. 3; also see Tables S5 and S6). A total of 155 genes were upregulated during SM101 sporulation (Fig. 3; also see Table S5). Twenty-one genes were Spo0A- or sigma factor-regulated genes in C. difficile but were not upregulated during sporulation in SM101 (Fig. 3; also see Table S6). Therefore, we found that DCA led to the upregulation of 106 genes that appear to be unrelated to the process of sporulation based on comparisons with previously published SM101 and C. difficile sporulation transcriptomes (Fig. 3; also see Table S7).
FIG 3.

Venn diagrams indicating numbers of regulated genes identified in NCTC8239, SM101, and/or C. difficile. NCTC8239 was cocultured with Caco-2 cells in S/DMEM(−) or S/D/DMEM(−) for 1 to 12 h, and total RNA extracted was subjected to a DNA microarray analysis. The 332 genes significantly upregulated during DCA-induced sporulation in NCTC8239 were compared to the orthologs identified as being upregulated during sporulation in SM101 (32) and as being regulated by Spo0A/sigma factors in C. difficile JIR8094 (29).
Thirty-three out of the 106 genes were defined as a putative protein, hypothetical protein, or conserved domain protein. Therefore, we focused on the remaining 73 genes and applied the Cluster of Orthologous Groups of proteins (COG) classification (48) in order to further characterize the genes in NCTC8239. We conducted a BLAST search for each gene in NCTC8239 with C. perfringens strain 13 and/or SM101, in which the genes had been classified by COG, and then sorted the genes functionally (Fig. 4; also see Table S7 in the supplemental material). In the group of energy production and conversion (group C), glpK was predicted to comprise an operon with the operon antiterminator gene glpP belonging to group K, which also was specifically stimulated by DCA. These are known to be under the control of carbon (glycerol and glucose) catabolite repression in Bacillus subtilis (49). mbl in the group of cell cycle control and division (group D) was predicted to be located in the same operon as spoIIID, encoding the sporulation-related protein SpoIIID. In the group of amino acid transport and metabolism (group E), arcA, argF, arcD, and arcC were predicted to comprise an operon. pepT, encoding a hydrolase, was involved in germination in Bacillus anthracis (50). As for AC7_0201, encoding sodium/solute symporter family proteins, a bacterial homolog of the apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter was detected in Neisseria meningitides (51), implying that deoxycholate can be absorbed in the cytoplasm in NCTC8239 through this symporter. Gcn5-related N-acetyltransferase is required for the recovery of non-N-acetylated muropeptides during cell wall turnover in Clostridium acetobutylicum (52). dapA and dapB encode the precursor synthetic enzymes for dipicolinic acid and were activated during sporulation in Bacillus cereus (53, 54). As for AC7_2228, encoding nucleoside diphosphate kinase in the group of nucleotide transport and metabolism (group F), the phosphodonor Spo0B of B. anthracis exhibited the diphosphate kinase-like activity of phosphate transfer from nucleoside triphosphate to nucleoside diphosphate (55). Furthermore, the nucleoside diphosphate kinase of P. aeruginosa showed 77% homology at the N terminus with Spo0E, a negative regulator of sporulation in B. subtilis (56). In the group of carbohydrate transport and metabolism (group G), AC7_0583, encoding the ABC transporter, was predicted to comprise an operon with a two-component system of AC7_0581 (sensor histidine kinase) and AC7_0582 (AraC family DNA-binding response regulator). AC7_0581 also was stimulated specifically in response to DCA (group T), and the ortholog of AC7_0582 was a Spo0A-dependent gene in C. difficile (29). The orthologs of glgC, AC7_A0087 (encoding glycogen synthase) and glgB, are known as the σE regulon in B. subtilis (57). In the group of lipid transport and metabolism (group I), nagH, encoding hyaluronidase (μ-toxin), was shown to be regulated by the DNA-responding regulator RevR in C. perfringens strain 13 (58, 59). In the group of translation (group J), argS, cysS, and ileS, encoding arginyl-, cysteinyl-, and isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase, respectively, were specifically upregulated for DCA. It has not yet been established whether they are important for DCA-induced sporulation, while valyl-tRNA synthetase altered its activity during the early stage of sporulation and was closely related to the sporulation of B. subtilis (60), suggesting that they are essential genes for DCA-induced sporulation in NCTC8239. In the group of transcription (group K), AC7_0446, encoding the LacI family transcriptional regulator, has been identified as a negative regulator of the maltose operon (61, 62). In the group of cell wall/membrane biogenesis (group M), the orthologs of murB, murC, and murF belong to the σK regulon in B. subtilis (63). In the group of posttranslational modifications (group O), the ortholog of ftsH is known as a general stress gene and was shown to be involved in sporulation in B. subtilis (64). The upregulation of groEL and groS was consistent with previous findings showing that bile salts induce chaperone proteins to repair misfolded proteins in B. cereus (65). The expression of nrdG encoding the anaerobic ribonucleoside-triphosphate reductase-activating protein was upregulated in response to DCA, whereas the target gene encoding anaerobic ribonucleoside-triphosphate reductase (AC7_0944) was not differentially expressed in the presence of DCA (see Table S3). The expression of iron storage proteins was modulated during bile exposure in Helicobacter pylori (66), and iron has been shown to induce sporulation in Bacillus spp. (67); however, it is not yet clear whether DCA-induced feoB, encoding the iron transporter and belonging to the group of inorganic ion transport and metabolism (group P), is important for sporulation. AC7_1145, encoding 7-alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in the group of secondary metabolite biosynthesis and catabolism (group Q), is known as an enzyme for bile acid transformation produced by intestinal microbiota (68). In the group of signal transduction mechanisms (group T), the expression of AC7_0488, encoding the sensor histidine kinase, was upregulated, while that of its response regulator (AC7_0487) was not altered during DCA-induced sporulation in NCTC8239 (see Table S3). In the group undifferentiated by COGs containing 3 genes, spoIIGA and AC7_2417, encoding a small acid-soluble spore protein, are defined as sporulation-related genes.
FIG 4.
Differentially expressed genes specific for DCA-induced sporulation in NCTC8239. Of the 106 genes specifically induced by DCA as shown in Fig. 3, 73 genes with known functions were divided based on the COG classification. The heat maps indicate the ratio of gene expression levels in S/D/DMEM(−) to those in S/DMEM(−) at identical time points (1 to 12 h). The gene or product names are shown on the right of the maps. The numbers shown in parentheses indicate locus tags. COG classifications are on the left sides of the maps: C, energy production and conversion; D, cell cycle control, cell division, and chromosome partitioning; E, amino acid transport and metabolism; F, nucleotide transport and metabolism; G, carbohydrate transport and metabolism; I, lipid transport and metabolism; J, translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis; K, transcription; L, replication, recombination, and repair; M, cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis; O, posttranslational modification, protein turnover, and chaperones; P, inorganic ion transport and metabolism; Q, secondary metabolite biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism; R, general function prediction only; T, signal transduction mechanisms; V, defense mechanisms; NF, no COG found. All data represent the means from three independent experiments. Details of differentially expressed genes are shown in Table S7 in the supplemental material.
In summary, various functional types of genes were differentially expressed during DCA-induced sporulation in NCTC8239. Two-thirds of these genes were consistent with previous findings obtained with sporulation-related genes in SM101 and/or C. difficile. In the remaining one-third, some genes were reported to be involved in bile stress or the sporulation process in Clostridium spp., Bacillus spp., and/or other bacteria, while the mechanisms by which the other genes are involved in DCA-induced sporulation have not yet been elucidated. They may be essential for inducing sporulation by DCA.
Sporulation-related gene expression of NCTC8239 during DCA-induced sporulation.
Of the 2,761 genes analyzed, we extracted 78 sporulation-related genes based on the NCBI and PATRIC databases (see Table S8 in the supplemental material). We divided them into two groups. One included the genes differentially expressed (upregulated) in response to the addition of DCA in at least one time point during the experiment (Fig. 5A and B), and the other included genes whose expression was not significantly altered during the experiment (Fig. 5C and D). We then compared each of them with the orthologs in the previous findings obtained with SM101 (32) and C. difficile (29) in order to elucidate whether gene expression is specific for DCA-induced sporulation in NCTC8239. Forty-eight out of the 50 upregulated genes also were stimulated during sporulation in SM101 and/or regulated by Spo0A or sigma factors in C. difficile (Fig. 5A). spoIIGA and AC7_2417, encoding a small acid-soluble protein, were specifically stimulated during DCA-induced sporulation in NCTC8239. Eighteen out of the 28 genes not differentially expressed also were not stimulated in SM101 or C. difficile (Fig. 5C). The expression of the remaining 10 genes, including spoIID, spoIVB, AC7_2278, spoVAC, spoVT, cotJC, gpr, ylbJ, AC7_2160, and ytvI, was not altered specifically in DCA-induced sporulation in NCTC8239.
FIG 5.
Transcriptional analysis of genes related to sporulation. Based on microarray data, 78 sporulation-related genes were extracted and divided into two groups: one was significantly upregulated during at least one time point (A and B), and the expression of the other was not altered during the experiment (C and D). (A and C) Venn diagrams of genes upregulated (A) or not altered (C) in this study with the orthologs previously reported in SM101 (32) and C. difficile (29) as shown in Fig. 3. (B and D) The heat maps indicate the ratio of gene expression levels of genes upregulated (B) or not altered (D) in S/D/DMEM(−) to those in S/DMEM(−) at identical time points (1 to 12 h). The gene names and stages in the sporulation process are shown on the right and left sides of the heat maps, respectively. The genes in boldface indicate that their expression was specific for DCA-induced sporulation in NCTC8239, as shown in panels A and C. All data represent the means from three independent experiments. The details of gene expression are shown in Table S8 in the supplemental material.
We next divided 78 genes into the sporulation stages in order to elucidate which sporulation stage is activated by DCA (Fig. 5B and D; also see Table S8 in the supplemental material). NCTC8239 had three or four homologs in spoVB, spoVD, and cotS. Of these, each homolog in spoVB and spoVD showed different expression profiles during DCA-induced sporulation; some were dependent on sporulation, whereas others were not. It is important to note that no significant differences were observed in the expression patterns of spo0A in the presence or absence of DCA at any time point (Fig. 5D, stage 0). Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in the expression of genes in stage 0 in the presence or absence of DCA. In contrast, the expression of genes in stage II, including spoIIAA and spoIIAB, was markedly higher in S/D/DMEM(−) than in S/DMEM(−) at 3 or 4 hpi. Spo0A-regulated sigma factors, including sigF (predicted to comprise an operon with spoIIAA and spoIIAB), sigE (predicted to comprise an operon with spoIIGA and sigG), sigG, and sigK also were strongly expressed in the presence of DCA at 4 hpi. The expression of a large number of genes in stages III and IV was significantly stronger in cultures with DCA at 4 hpi. The expression of many stage V genes, spore coat genes, and other sporulation-related genes also was significantly upregulated at 4 or 6 hpi. These results were consistent with DCA increasing the cell population of the sporulation process, as shown in Fig. 2C.
We then performed qRT-PCR using newly prepared samples in order to confirm the microarray results (see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material). The samples were not amplified without reverse transcription. Consistent with the microarray data, DCA significantly upregulated the expression of spoIIAA, spoIIAB, sigF, spoIIGA, and sigE, whereas that of spo0A and spoIIR was not altered in the presence or absence of DCA at 4 hpi. Taken together, these results demonstrated that DCA activated Spo0A-regulated genes but not spo0A itself during sporulation.
Detection of Spo0A∼P.
In Bacillus spp., the Spo0A protein is activated through its phosphorylation by histidine kinase(s) followed by dimerization (69). The activated Spo0A protein binds to DNA promoter regions containing the Spo0A-binding motif, called the 0A box (TGNCGAA), and then regulates the expression of Spo0A-regulated genes (70). Therefore, we hypothesized that DCA activates the Spo0A protein. In order to compare the amount of Spo0A∼P in the presence or absence of DCA, NCTC8239 was cocultured with Caco-2 cells in S/DMEM(−) or S/D/DMEM(−) for 4 h, and cell lysates were loaded onto Phos-tag acrylamide gels (Fig. 6A). We detected two bands, one as a slowly migrating band and another at a lower position. The amount of the upper band was greater in the presence of DCA (Fig. 6A, lane 3) than in its absence (Fig. 6A, lane 2). In the sample cultured in DS sporulation medium in SM101 (Fig. 6A, lane 4), we found results similar to those observed in NCTC8239. We then constructed an SM101 strain harboring the missense gene mutation (D58A) for the phosphorylation site of Spo0A. No shifted bands were detected in the samples of the mutant strain (MY97) cultured in DS sporulation medium (Fig. 6A, lane 5). We also found that the upper bands disappeared when the samples were heated. Taken together, these results indicate that the upper band is phosphorylated Spo0A and the lower band is the unphosphorylated form, and also that the amount of Spo0A∼P is higher in S/D/DMEM(−) than in S/DMEM(−). We cocultured bacterial cells with Caco-2 cells in DMEM(−) containing glucose [G/DMEM(−)], because glucose is known to inhibit sporulation by regulating the transcription of spo0A (71). Bacterial cells did not sporulate in G/DMEM(−) until 24 hpi (25) even with the addition of DCA (data not shown). We found that the upper band was not detected in G/DMEM(−) in Phos-tag analyses (Fig. 6A, lane 1), suggesting that glucose would inhibit the phosphorylation of Spo0A in addition to spo0A transcription. We then quantified band intensities in the absence and presence of DCA in order to estimate the ratio of the phosphorylated to unphosphorylated form of Spo0A using Image-J software. The ratio of Spo0A∼P to the unphosphorylated form of Spo0A was 6.4-fold higher in S/D/DMEM(−) than in S/DMEM(−) (Fig. 6B). These results indicated that the phosphorylation of the Spo0A protein was facilitated in the presence of DCA.
FIG 6.

Detection of Spo0A phosphorylation. (A) NCTC8239 was cocultured with Caco-2 cells in S/DMEM(−) (lane 2), S/D/DMEM(−) (lane 3), or DMEM(−) containing glucose [G/DMEM(−)] (lane 1) for 4 h. The cell lysates collected were loaded onto a Phos-tag acrylamide gel and subjected to Western blot analysis using an Spo0A-specific antibody. Lower bands are the unphosphorylated form of Spo0A (Spo0A), and upper bands indicate the phosphorylated form of Spo0A (Spo0A∼P). DS(SM101) or DS(MY97), the lysate of strain SM101 (expressing wild-type Spo0A) (lane 4) or MY97 (expressing nonphosphorylatable Spo0A) (lane 5) cultured in DS broth for 4 h, was used as a positive or negative control, respectively, for the phosphorylation of Spo0A. Samples identical to those of lanes 1 to 5 were heated at 100°C for 5 min and loaded as the total amount of unphosphorylated Spo0A (lanes 6 to 10). (B) The ratio of Spo0A∼P to Spo0A in S/DMEM(−) (lane 2) and S/D/DMEM(−) (lane 3) was assessed with Image J software. All data represent the means ± SD from three independent experiments. **, P < 0.01 [significantly different from S/DMEM(−)].
Search for candidate genes increasing Spo0A∼P.
In Bacillus spp., three histidine kinases are mainly involved in Spo0A phosphorylation (69, 70), whereas the genes corresponding to the kinases are not conserved in clostridia. In some Clostridium spp., orphan histidine kinases have been identified as direct activators of Spo0A (34–36). In order to determine which orphan kinases are essential for Spo0A phosphorylation, we identified 8 orphan histidine kinases from 2,778 coding sequences in NCTC8239 based on blastp analyses with kinases from C. perfringens strains 13 and SM101 (35). We then examined their expression profiles in our microarray data sets because the expression of genes encoding histidine kinases was induced at the beginning of sporulation in B. subtilis (33, 72). However, none of the genes were differentially expressed (i.e., reached the threshold defined by us) in the presence of DCA in NCTC8239 (Table 2).
TABLE 2.
Expression of genes encoding orphan histidine kinases
| Locus tag | Gene expression by time pointa |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 h |
2 h |
3 h |
4 h |
6 h |
12 h |
|||||||
| Fold change | P value | Fold change | P value | Fold change | P value | Fold change | P value | Fold change | P value | Fold change | P value | |
| AC7_0230 | 1.08 | 0.86 | −1.03 | 0.95 | 1.52 | 0.35 | −1.11 | 0.69 | 1.57 | 0.41 | −1.03 | 0.96 |
| AC7_0895 | −1.19 | 0.86 | −1.01 | 0.99 | −1.43 | 0.61 | −1.58 | 0.61 | 1.31 | 0.61 | 1.33 | 0.70 |
| AC7_1186 | 1.12 | 0.79 | −1.03 | 0.95 | 1.15 | 0.72 | 1.13 | 0.28 | 2.51 | 0.03 | 1.62 | 0.25 |
| AC7_1236 | 1.07 | 0.29 | 1.05 | 0.68 | −1.12 | 0.35 | −1.07 | 0.71 | 1.11 | 0.61 | −1.00 | 0.98 |
| AC7_1579 | 1.21 | 0.38 | 1.18 | 0.65 | 2.19 | 0.10 | 2.89 | 0.02 | 4.83 | 0.06 | 2.00 | 0.17 |
| AC7_1765 | 1.11 | 0.76 | 1.13 | 0.80 | 1.22 | 0.58 | −1.25 | 0.14 | 3.82 | 0.02 | 1.63 | 0.26 |
| AC7_2012 | 1.04 | 0.98 | −1.02 | 0.99 | 1.33 | 0.73 | 1.46 | 0.31 | 2.07 | 0.07 | 1.44 | 0.40 |
| AC7_2242 | 1.25 | 0.33 | 1.11 | 0.76 | 1.50 | 0.23 | 1.64 | 0.01 | 2.68 | 0.10 | 1.67 | 0.26 |
| AC7_2243 | 1.32 | 0.56 | −1.09 | 0.75 | −1.42 | 0.61 | −1.40 | 0.63 | 1.79 | 0.25 | 1.52 | 0.37 |
Fold changes in gene expression in S/D/DMEM(−) relative to that in S/DMEM(−) are shown.
In an attempt to identify other candidate genes that increase Spo0A∼P, we extended our focus to the genes upregulated at 3 hpi in the presence of DCA, because several Spo0A-regulated genes (spoIIAA, spoIIAB, spoIIE, and spoIIGA) already were induced at that time point (Fig. 5B; also see Table S8 in the supplemental material). We found that three genes (AC7_0229, A0092, and A0093) were significantly induced by DCA (see Tables S3 and S4). AC7_0229 encoded a hypothetical protein. Its orthologs also were found in C. perfringens strains 13, SM101, and ATCC 13124 from the blastp search; however, the gene did not appear to be conserved in other clostridia. Thus, although it is conceivable that AC7_0229 plays a role in DCA-induced Spo0A activation, the putative cascade must be specific to C. perfringens strains. Another candidate, AC7_A0092, encoded the glucose-1-phosphate adenylyl transferase GlgD subunit. This enzyme catalyzes the conversion of alpha-d-glucose 1-phosphate to ADP-glucose and participates in starch and sucrose metabolism (73). It currently remains unclear whether the carbohydrate-metabolizing enzyme is directly involved in the activation of Spo0A. The other candidate, AC7_A0093, encodes phosphotransbutyrylase, which catalyzes the conversion of butyryl-coenzyme A (CoA) to butyryl phosphate (BuP) (74). This gene possesses an Spo0A box in its promoter region (75). It is noteworthy that the high level of BuP induced by a defective mutant of butyrate kinase, which converts BuP to butyrate, accelerated sporulation in C. acetobutylicum (33, 74). Collectively, we found three upregulated genes that may contribute to the phosphorylation of Spo0A in DCA-induced sporulation.
Expression of genes regulating virulence.
C. perfringens strains produce various extracellular enzymes and toxins through a global regulation system (76). For example, the production of α-toxin, θ-toxin, κ-toxin, proteases, and sialidases is known to be positively regulated by the two-component VirR/VirS system and agr system (76). C. perfringens strains also produce sporulation-dependent CPE. CodY has been shown to function as a global regulator of virulence-associated properties in the type D strain (77), and AbrB has been identified as a global repressor involved in sporulation and biofilm formation in B. subtilis (78) and a C. perfringens type A strain (79). Therefore, we determined whether DCA modified the expression of these virulence-associated genes. Microarray data revealed that there was no evidence to show that DCA induced the expression of virR-virS or VirRS-VR regulons such as plc, pfoA, and colA, encoding α-toxin, θ-toxin, and κ-toxin, respectively (Fig. 7A). The 2,778 coding sequences lacked several genes, including cpe, codY, abrB, and agrB. Therefore, we performed qRT-PCR at 4 hpi in order to investigate whether these genes were involved in DCA-induced sporulation (Fig. 7B). As expected, DCA significantly upregulated the expression of cpe, which is consistent with our previous findings showing DCA-induced CPE production (25). In contrast, the expression of codY and abrB was not altered in the presence or absence of DCA. The expression of agrB decreased significantly in the presence of DCA, suggesting that DCA regulates the agr system negatively. These results indicate that DCA induced sporulation-regulated toxin gene expression but did not stimulate a major toxin-regulating system, such as the VirR/VirS system or the global transcriptional regulators codY and abrB.
FIG 7.

Expression of virulence-associated genes during DCA-induced sporulation. (A) The heat map indicates the ratio of gene expression levels in S/D/DMEM(−) to those in S/DMEM(−) at identical time points (1 to 12 h). All data represent the means from three independent experiments. The details of gene expression are shown in Table S3 in the supplemental material. (B) NCTC8239 was cocultured with Caco-2 cells in S/DMEM(−) (open bars) or S/D/DMEM(−) (solid bars). RNA was extracted from samples at 4 hpi and subjected to qRT-PCR for cpe, codY, abrB, and agrB. The y axis represents relative fold changes in the gene expression levels of S/D/DMEM(−) against S/DMEM(−). All data represent the means ± SEM from three independent experiments. *, P < 0.05 [significantly different from S/DMEM(−)].
DISCUSSION
Bile has been shown to induce sporulation (22–25); however, the mechanisms underlying bile-induced sporulation have not yet been elucidated in detail. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to demonstrate that DCA induces sporulation, at least partially, by enhancing the phosphorylation of Spo0A and activating Spo0A-regulated genes. The increased expression of Spo0A-regulated genes in our study was attributed to the facilitation of Spo0A phosphorylation, because the Spo0A protein is activated through phosphorylation by histidine kinase(s) followed by dimerization and controls the expression of Spo0A-regulated genes (69, 70). Further studies are needed to determine whether DCA-induced sporulation is exclusively dependent on increases in the phosphorylation of Spo0A.
The mechanism by which DCA affects the phosphorylation of Spo0A also needs to be clarified. One possibility is that DCA as a ligand stimulates the genes encoding histidine kinases, which directly activate the Spo0A protein. The expression of genes encoding histidine kinases was previously reported to be induced at the beginning of sporulation in B. subtilis (33, 72). Although the orthologs of these kinases are not conserved in clostridia, histidine kinases directly activated the Spo0A protein and induced sporulation in several clostridia (34–36). Thus, we focused on the gene expression of orphan histidine kinases in our microarray analysis. However, none of the orphan kinases reached the threshold defined by us in response to DCA (Table 2). Eswaramoorthy et al. (80) demonstrated that a less than 2-fold change in the concentration of KinA led to a 10-fold change in the number of spores. Thus, although we did not detect the upregulation of orphan kinases, they may still be involved in the sporulation process. DCA might enhance Spo0A activity by posttranslationally activating kinase function.
A second possibility is that DCA as a ligand stimulates a two-component system, leading to the activation of Spo0A. In the present study, we showed that DCA increased the expression of nagH, encoding hyaluronidase (μ-toxin) (Fig. 4; also see Table S7 in the supplemental material). Hiscox et al. (58, 59) revealed that nagH was positively regulated by the response regulator RevR in strain 13. They also showed that genes involved in the formation of the spore coat, septum, and cortex were downregulated in the revR null mutant (58). A total of 46% (30 out of the 65 orthologs identified) of RevR positively regulated genes in strain 13 (58) were upregulated during DCA-induced sporulation in this study (see Table S4), including genes specifically upregulated by DCA, arcA, arcD, arcC, AC7_2228 (nucleoside diphosphate kinase), and AC7_0585 (ABC transporter) (Fig. 4), while the expression of the ortholog of revR (AC7_0656) was not altered (see Table S3). The sensor kinase of RevR has not yet been reported; however, NCTC8239 may sense DCA by the two-component system involving RevR and regulate sporulation.
The third possibility is that DCA stimulates an unknown cascade that leads to the activation of Spo0A. Our microarray data at 3 hpi revealed a candidate for the activation of Spo0A: the phosphotransbutyrylase gene (AC7_A0093). This enzyme catalyzes the conversion of butyryl-CoA to BuP (74). High levels of BuP induced by the defective mutant of butyrate kinase, which converts BuP to butyrate, have been shown to accelerate sporulation in C. acetobutylicum (33). In Escherichia coli, another phosphate, acetyl phosphate, can donate its phosphoryl group to the two-component response regulator (81). Thus, BuP may act as a phosphodonor for transcription factors. It is noteworthy here that AC7_A0093 has a Spo0A box in its promoter region (75), indicating functional similarities to the phosphotransbutyrylase with Spo0F, which is known to act as a phosphodonor for Spo0A in Bacillus spp. The corresponding gene, spo0F, possesses an Spo0A-binding site on its promoter region, and the transcription of spo0F is controlled by Spo0A∼P in B. subtilis (82, 83), which supports this hypothesis. Thus, DCA may increase the production of BuP as a phosphodonor for the Spo0A protein in NCTC8239. Furthermore, the genes specifically upregulated by DCA as shown in Fig. 4 may be essential molecules in DCA-induced sporulation. Their involvement in the sporulation process needs to be investigated by, for example, gene knockout in future studies. We also propose other possibilities for the activation of Spo0A: (i) the factor(s) that senses DCA and induces the phosphorylation of Spo0A is not differentially expressed transcriptionally in response to DCA, or (ii) residual genes in the gaps between contigs are responsible for inducing the phosphorylation of Spo0A. Further investigations, including random mutagenesis and/or transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq), will be needed in order to identify the bacterial factor(s) and elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying DCA-induced sporulation.
Our microarray data revealed that several genes considered to be downstream of Spo0A in the sporulation signal cascade were not upregulated during DCA-induced sporulation (Fig. 5C and D; also see Table S8 in the supplemental material). These results were unexpected, because Galperin et al. (38) found that spoIID, spoIIR, spoIVB, spoVK, spoVS, spoVG, and ylbJ were essential for the sporulation of B. subtilis and were conserved in all spore-forming bacilli and clostridia. A transcriptome analysis during sporulation in SM101 revealed the upregulation of spoIID, spoIVB, spoIVFB, spoVAC, spoVT, cotJC, and ylbJ (32). Although the actual involvement of these genes in the sporulation of NCTC8239 remains to be delineated, a feasible explanation of our results would be differential sensitivity to our microarray analyses relative to others, so that the genes described above were expressed at levels below the limits of detection. Another possibility is that the genes are not involved in DCA-induced sporulation or that an alternative signaling molecule(s) plays a part in the DCA-stimulated sporulation cascade in NCTC8239.
As shown in Fig. S4 in the supplemental material, qRT-PCR confirmed that spoIIR was not upregulated during DCA-induced sporulation in NCTC8239. This observation implies that spoIIR is regulated by a factor separate from Spo0A and SigF. These results contrast with those for B. subtilis (38) and C. difficile (84) and suggest that spoIIR would be variably regulated in the Firmicutes.
It is becoming increasingly obvious that enteric pathogens use bile as an environmental cue to control the regulation of virulence genes (17–20). In the present study, DCA induced sporulation and the expression of cpe, encoding enterotoxin (Fig. 7B), which is consistent with our previous findings showing that DCA enhanced the production of CPE (25). In contrast, taurocholate was identified as a germinant for C. difficile (85, 86), which implies that different species of clostridia share the same stimuli in order to respond to opposite outcomes, sporulation and germination. In contrast to C. difficile, C. perfringens is a foodborne pathogen that has to establish an infection site in the intestinal tract. C. perfringens may have acquired a unique mechanism to respond to host factor(s) such as bile in order to survive and exert its pathological effects in the intestinal tract.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Tohru Shimizu and Kaori Ohtani (Kanazawa University) for providing the bacterial strain.
This work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI grant numbers 25860467 and 15K08783 to M.Y. and a grant from the Takeda Science Foundation to M.Y.
Footnotes
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00252-16.
REFERENCES
- 1.Japanese Society of Chemotherapy Committee on Guidelines for Treatment of Anaerobic Infections. 2011. Chapter 2-12-6. Anaerobic infections (individual fields): food poisoning due to Clostridium perfringens. J Infect Chemother 17(Suppl 1):S135–S136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lindstrom M, Heikinheimo A, Lahti P, Korkeala H. 2011. Novel insights into the epidemiology of Clostridium perfringens type A food poisoning. Food Microbiol 28:192–198. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2010.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gormley FJ, Little CL, Rawal N, Gillespie IA, Lebaigue S, Adak GK. 2011. A 17-year review of foodborne outbreaks: describing the continuing decline in England and Wales (1992-2008). Epidemiol Infect 139:688–699. doi: 10.1017/S0950268810001858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, Tauxe RV, Widdowson MA, Roy SL, Jones JL, Griffin PM. 2011. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States–major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis 17:7–15. doi: 10.3201/eid1701.P11101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Uzal FA, Freedman JC, Shrestha A, Theoret JR, Garcia J, Awad MM, Adams V, Moore RJ, Rood JI, McClane BA. 2014. Towards an understanding of the role of Clostridium perfringens toxins in human and animal disease. Future Microbiol 9:361–377. doi: 10.2217/fmb.13.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Brynestad S, Granum PE. 2002. Clostridium perfringens and foodborne infections. Int J Food Microbiol 74:195–202. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00680-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dische FE, Elek SD. 1957. Experimental food-poisoning by Clostridium welchii. Lancet 273:71–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.McClane BA. 2001. The complex interactions between Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin and epithelial tight junctions. Toxicon 39:1781–1791. doi: 10.1016/S0041-0101(01)00164-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sarker MR, Carman RJ, McClane BA. 1999. Inactivation of the gene (cpe) encoding Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin eliminates the ability of two cpe-positive C. perfringens type A human gastrointestinal disease isolates to affect rabbit ileal loops. Mol Microbiol 33:946–958. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01534.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Skjelkvale R, Uemura T. 1977. Experimental diarrhoea in human volunteers following oral administration of Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin. J Appl Bacteriol 43:281–286. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1977.tb00752.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Veshnyakova A, Protze J, Rossa J, Blasig IE, Krause G, Piontek J. 2010. On the interaction of Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin with claudins. Toxins (Basel) 2:1336–1356. doi: 10.3390/toxins2061336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Begley M, Gahan CG, Hill C. 2005. The interaction between bacteria and bile. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29:625–651. doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Crawford RW, Gunn JS. 2009. The interaction of bile salts with pathogenic and nonpathogenic intestinal bacteria, p 183–200. Food-borne microbes: shaping the host ecosystem. ASM Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hylemon PB, Zhou H, Pandak WM, Ren S, Gil G, Dent P. 2009. Bile acids as regulatory molecules. J Lipid Res 50:1509–1520. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R900007-JLR200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hernandez SB, Cota I, Ducret A, Aussel L, Casadesus J. 2012. Adaptation and preadaptation of Salmonella enterica to bile. PLoS Genet 8:e1002459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Trainor EA, Horton KE, Savage PB, Testerman TL, McGee DJ. 2011. Role of the HefC efflux pump in Helicobacter pylori cholesterol-dependent resistance to ceragenins and bile salts. Infect Immun 79:88–97. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00974-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Osawa R, Yamai S. 1996. Production of thermostable direct hemolysin by Vibrio parahaemolyticus enhanced by conjugated bile acids. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:3023–3025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pope LM, Reed KE, Payne SM. 1995. Increased protein secretion and adherence to HeLa cells by Shigella spp. following growth in the presence of bile salts. Infect Immun 63:3642–3648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Raphael BH, Pereira S, Flom GA, Zhang Q, Ketley JM, Konkel ME. 2005. The Campylobacter jejuni response regulator, CbrR, modulates sodium deoxycholate resistance and chicken colonization. J Bacteriol 187:3662–3670. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.11.3662-3670.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yang M, Liu Z, Hughes C, Stern AM, Wang H, Zhong Z, Kan B, Fenical W, Zhu J. 2013. Bile salt-induced intermolecular disulfide bond formation activates Vibrio cholerae virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:2348–2353. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218039110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sakaguchi Y, Murata K, Kimura M. 1983. Clostridium perfringens and other anaerobes isolated from bile. J Clin Pathol 36:345–349. doi: 10.1136/jcp.36.3.345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Akaeda H, Taniguti T. 1987. Effects of gall powder on the spore-forming and enterotoxin-producing abilities of Clostridium perfringens. Nihon Saikingaku Zasshi 42:575–581. doi: 10.3412/jsb.42.575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.de Jong AE, Beumer RR, Rombouts FM. 2002. Optimizing sporulation of Clostridium perfringens. J Food Prot 65:1457–1462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Heredia NL, Labbe RG, Rodriguez MA, Garcia-Alvarado JS. 1991. Growth, sporulation and enterotoxin production by Clostridium perfringens type A in the presence of human bile salts. FEMS Microbiol Lett 68:15–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yasugi M, Sugahara Y, Hoshi H, Kondo K, Talukdar PK, Sarker MR, Yamamoto S, Kamata Y, Miyake M. 2015. In vitro cytotoxicity induced by Clostridium perfringens isolate carrying a chromosomal cpe gene is exclusively dependent on sporulation and enterotoxin production. Microb Pathog 85:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2015.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Higgins D, Dworkin J. 2012. Recent progress in Bacillus subtilis sporulation. FEMS Microbiol Rev 36:131–148. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00310.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hilbert DW, Piggot PJ. 2004. Compartmentalization of gene expression during Bacillus subtilis spore formation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 68:234–262. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.68.2.234-262.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Alsaker KV, Papoutsakis ET. 2005. Transcriptional program of early sporulation and stationary-phase events in Clostridium acetobutylicum. J Bacteriol 187:7103–7118. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.20.7103-7118.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fimlaid KA, Bond JP, Schutz KC, Putnam EE, Leung JM, Lawley TD, Shen A. 2013. Global analysis of the sporulation pathway of Clostridium difficile. PLoS Genet 9:e1003660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jones SW, Paredes CJ, Tracy B, Cheng N, Sillers R, Senger RS, Papoutsakis ET. 2008. The transcriptional program underlying the physiology of clostridial sporulation. Genome Biol 9:R114. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-7-r114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Saujet L, Pereira FC, Serrano M, Soutourina O, Monot M, Shelyakin PV, Gelfand MS, Dupuy B, Henriques AO, Martin-Verstraete I. 2013. Genome-wide analysis of cell type-specific gene transcription during spore formation in Clostridium difficile. PLoS Genet 9:e1003756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Xiao Y, van Hijum SA, Abee T, Wells-Bennik MH. 2015. Genome-wide transcriptional profiling of Clostridium perfringens SM101 during sporulation extends the core of putative sporulation genes and genes determining spore properties and germination characteristics. PLoS One 10:e0127036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Paredes CJ, Alsaker KV, Papoutsakis ET. 2005. A comparative genomic view of clostridial sporulation and physiology. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:969–978. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Steiner E, Dago AE, Young DI, Heap JT, Minton NP, Hoch JA, Young M. 2011. Multiple orphan histidine kinases interact directly with Spo0A to control the initiation of endospore formation in Clostridium acetobutylicum. Mol Microbiol 80:641–654. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07608.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Talukdar PK, Olguin-Araneda V, Alnoman M, Paredes-Sabja D, Sarker MR. 2015. Updates on the sporulation process in Clostridium species. Res Microbiol 166:225–235. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2014.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Underwood S, Guan S, Vijayasubhash V, Baines SD, Graham L, Lewis RJ, Wilcox MH, Stephenson K. 2009. Characterization of the sporulation initiation pathway of Clostridium difficile and its role in toxin production. J Bacteriol 191:7296–7305. doi: 10.1128/JB.00882-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Edwards AN, Nawrocki KL, McBride SM. 2014. Conserved oligopeptide permeases modulate sporulation initiation in Clostridium difficile. Infect Immun 82:4276–4291. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02323-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Galperin MY, Mekhedov SL, Puigbo P, Smirnov S, Wolf YI, Rigden DJ. 2012. Genomic determinants of sporulation in Bacilli and Clostridia: towards the minimal set of sporulation-specific genes. Environ Microbiol 14:2870–2890. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02841.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Huang IH, Waters M, Grau RR, Sarker MR. 2004. Disruption of the gene (spo0A) encoding sporulation transcription factor blocks endospore formation and enterotoxin production in enterotoxigenic Clostridium perfringens type A. FEMS Microbiol Lett 233:233–240. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2004.tb09487.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Duncan CL, Strong DH. 1968. Improved medium for sporulation of Clostridium perfringens. Appl Microbiol 16:82–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hosomi K, Kuwana R, Takamatsu H, Kohda T, Kozaki S, Mukamoto M. 2015. Morphological and genetic characterization of group I Clostridium botulinum type B strain 111 and the transcriptional regulator spoIIID gene knockout mutant in sporulation. Anaerobe 33:55–63. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hassan KA, Elbourne LD, Tetu SG, Melville SB, Rood JI, Paulsen IT. 2015. Genomic analyses of Clostridium perfringens isolates from five toxinotypes. Res Microbiol 166:255–263. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2014.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bannam TL, Rood JI. 1993. Clostridium perfringens-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors that carry single antibiotic resistance determinants. Plasmid 29:233–235. doi: 10.1006/plas.1993.1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Barbieri CM, Stock AM. 2008. Universally applicable methods for monitoring response regulator aspartate phosphorylation both in vitro and in vivo using Phos-tag-based reagents. Anal Biochem 376:73–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2008.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Fujita M. 2000. Temporal and selective association of multiple sigma factors with RNA polymerase during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Genes Cells 5:79–88. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.2000.00307.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Myers GS, Rasko DA, Cheung JK, Ravel J, Seshadri R, DeBoy RT, Ren Q, Varga J, Awad MM, Brinkac LM, Daugherty SC, Haft DH, Dodson RJ, Madupu R, Nelson WC, Rosovitz MJ, Sullivan SA, Khouri H, Dimitrov GI, Watkins KL, Mulligan S, Benton J, Radune D, Fisher DJ, Atkins HS, Hiscox T, Jost BH, Billington SJ, Songer JG, McClane BA, Titball RW, Rood JI, Melville SB, Paulsen IT. 2006. Skewed genomic variability in strains of the toxigenic bacterial pathogen, Clostridium perfringens. Genome Res 16:1031–1040. doi: 10.1101/gr.5238106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gopal S, Schroeder M, Pieper U, Sczyrba A, Aytekin-Kurban G, Bekiranov S, Fajardo JE, Eswar N, Sanchez R, Sali A, Gaasterland T. 2001. Homology-based annotation yields 1,042 new candidate genes in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Nat Genet 27:337–340. doi: 10.1038/85922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ. 1997. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science 278:631–637. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5338.631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Darbon E, Servant P, Poncet S, Deutscher J. 2002. Antitermination by GlpP, catabolite repression via CcpA and inducer exclusion triggered by P-GlpK dephosphorylation control Bacillus subtilis glpFK expression. Mol Microbiol 43:1039–1052. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02800.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Liu H, Bergman NH, Thomason B, Shallom S, Hazen A, Crossno J, Rasko DA, Ravel J, Read TD, Peterson SN, Yates J III, Hanna PC. 2004. Formation and composition of the Bacillus anthracis endospore. J Bacteriol 186:164–178. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.1.164-178.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hu NJ, Iwata S, Cameron AD, Drew D. 2011. Crystal structure of a bacterial homologue of the bile acid sodium symporter ASBT. Nature 478:408–411. doi: 10.1038/nature10450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Reith J, Mayer C. 2011. Characterization of a glucosamine/glucosaminide N-acetyltransferase of Clostridium acetobutylicum. J Bacteriol 193:5393–5399. doi: 10.1128/JB.05519-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hoganson DA, Stahly DP. 1975. Regulation of dihydrodipicolinate synthase during growth and sporulation of Bacillus cereus. J Bacteriol 124:1344–1350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Forman M, Aronson A. 1972. Regulation of dipicolinic acid biosynthesis in sporulating Bacillus cereus. Characterization of enzymic changes and analysis of mutants. Biochem J 126:503–513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Mattoo AR, Saif Zaman M, Dubey GP, Arora A, Narayan A, Jailkhani N, Rathore K, Maiti S, Singh Y. 2008. Spo0B of Bacillus anthracis–a protein with pleiotropic functions. FEBS J 275:739–752. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.06240.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Shankar S, Kavanaugh-Black A, Kamath S, Chakrabarty AM. 1995. Characterization of a phosphoprotein phosphatase for the phosphorylated form of nucleoside-diphosphate kinase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Biol Chem 270:28246–28250. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.47.28246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kiel JA, Boels JM, Beldman G, Venema G. 1994. Glycogen in Bacillus subtilis: molecular characterization of an operon encoding enzymes involved in glycogen biosynthesis and degradation. Mol Microbiol 11:203–218. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00301.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hiscox TJ, Chakravorty A, Choo JM, Ohtani K, Shimizu T, Cheung JK, Rood JI. 2011. Regulation of virulence by the RevR response regulator in Clostridium perfringens. Infect Immun 79:2145–2153. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00060-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hiscox TJ, Harrison PF, Chakravorty A, Choo JM, Ohtani K, Shimizu T, Cheung JK, Rood JI. 2013. Regulation of sialidase production in Clostridium perfringens by the orphan sensor histidine kinase ReeS. PLoS One 8:e73525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ohyama K, Kaneko I, Yamakawa T, Ohkuma S. 1983. Two active forms of valyl-tRNA synthetase from Bacillus subtilis: alteration related to the early stages of sporulation. Microbiol Immunol 27:565–574. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1983.tb00617.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Muscariello L, Vastano V, Siciliano RA, Sacco M, Marasco R. 2011. Expression of the Lactobacillus plantarum malE gene is regulated by CcpA and a MalR-like protein. J Microbiol 49:950–955. doi: 10.1007/s12275-011-0495-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Shelburne SA III, Sahasrobhajane P, Suber B, Keith DB, Davenport MT, Horstmann N, Kumaraswami M, Olsen RJ, Brennan RG, Musser JM. 2011. Niche-specific contribution to streptococcal virulence of a MalR-regulated carbohydrate binding protein. Mol Microbiol 81:500–514. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07708.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Vasudevan P, Weaver A, Reichert ED, Linnstaedt SD, Popham DL. 2007. Spore cortex formation in Bacillus subtilis is regulated by accumulation of peptidoglycan precursors under the control of sigma K. Mol Microbiol 65:1582–1594. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05896.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Deuerling E, Mogk A, Richter C, Purucker M, Schumann W. 1997. The ftsH gene of Bacillus subtilis is involved in major cellular processes such as sporulation, stress adaptation and secretion. Mol Microbiol 23:921–933. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.2721636.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Kristoffersen SM, Ravnum S, Tourasse NJ, Okstad OA, Kolsto AB, Davies W. 2007. Low concentrations of bile salts induce stress responses and reduce motility in Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579. J Bacteriol 189:5302–5313. doi: 10.1128/JB.00239-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Shao C, Zhang Q, Sun Y, Liu Z, Zeng J, Zhou Y, Yu X, Jia J. 2008. Helicobacter pylori protein response to human bile stress. J Med Microbiol 57:151–158. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.47616-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Purohit M, Sassi-Gaha S, Rest RF. 2010. Rapid sporulation of Bacillus anthracis in a high iron, glucose-free medium. J Microbiol Methods 82:282–287. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Ridlon JM, Kang DJ, Hylemon PB. 2010. Isolation and characterization of a bile acid inducible 7alpha-dehydroxylating operon in Clostridium hylemonae TN271. Anaerobe 16:137–146. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2009.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Stephenson K, Hoch JA. 2002. Evolution of signalling in the sporulation phosphorelay. Mol Microbiol 46:297–304. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03186.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Molle V, Fujita M, Jensen ST, Eichenberger P, Gonzalez-Pastor JE, Liu JS, Losick R. 2003. The Spo0A regulon of Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 50:1683–1701. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03818.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Philippe VA, Mendez MB, Huang IH, Orsaria LM, Sarker MR, Grau RR. 2006. Inorganic phosphate induces spore morphogenesis and enterotoxin production in the intestinal pathogen Clostridium perfringens. Infect Immun 74:3651–3656. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02090-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Tojo S, Hirooka K, Fujita Y. 2013. Expression of kinA and kinB of Bacillus subtilis, necessary for sporulation initiation, is under positive stringent transcription control. J Bacteriol 195:1656–1665. doi: 10.1128/JB.02131-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Goh YJ, Klaenhammer TR. 2014. Insights into glycogen metabolism in Lactobacillus acidophilus: impact on carbohydrate metabolism, stress tolerance and gut retention. Microb Cell Fact 13:94. doi: 10.1186/s12934-014-0094-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zhao Y, Tomas CA, Rudolph FB, Papoutsakis ET, Bennett GN. 2005. Intracellular butyryl phosphate and acetyl phosphate concentrations in Clostridium acetobutylicum and their implications for solvent formation. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:530–537. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.1.530-537.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Ravagnani A, Jennert KC, Steiner E, Grunberg R, Jefferies JR, Wilkinson SR, Young DI, Tidswell EC, Brown DP, Youngman P, Morris JG, Young M. 2000. Spo0A directly controls the switch from acid to solvent production in solvent-forming clostridia. Mol Microbiol 37:1172–1185. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02071.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ohtani K, Shimizu T. 2015. Regulation of toxin gene expression in Clostridium perfringens. Res Microbiol 166:280–289. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2014.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Li J, Ma M, Sarker MR, McClane BA. 2013. CodY is a global regulator of virulence-associated properties for Clostridium perfringens type D strain CN3718. mBio 4:e00770–713. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00770-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Hamon MA, Stanley NR, Britton RA, Grossman AD, Lazazzera BA. 2004. Identification of AbrB-regulated genes involved in biofilm formation by Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 52:847–860. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04023.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Obana N, Nakamura K, Nomura N. 2014. A sporulation factor is involved in the morphological change of Clostridium perfringens biofilms in response to temperature. J Bacteriol 196:1540–1550. doi: 10.1128/JB.01444-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Eswaramoorthy P, Duan D, Dinh J, Dravis A, Devi SN, Fujita M. 2010. The threshold level of the sensor histidine kinase KinA governs entry into sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 192:3870–3882. doi: 10.1128/JB.00466-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Wolfe AJ. 2005. The acetate switch. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 69:12–50. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.69.1.12-50.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Asayama M, Yamamoto A, Kobayashi Y. 1995. Dimer form of phosphorylated Spo0A, a transcriptional regulator, stimulates the spo0F transcription at the initiation of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. J Mol Biol 250:11–23. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Strauch MA, Wu JJ, Jonas RH, Hoch JA. 1993. A positive feedback loop controls transcription of the spo0F gene, a component of the sporulation phosphorelay in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 7:967–974. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01188.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Saujet L, Pereira FC, Henriques AO, Martin-Verstraete I. 2014. The regulatory network controlling spore formation in Clostridium difficile. FEMS Microbiol Lett 358:1–10. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Sorg JA, Sonenshein AL. 2008. Bile salts and glycine as cogerminants for Clostridium difficile spores. J Bacteriol 190:2505–2512. doi: 10.1128/JB.01765-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Wheeldon LJ, Worthington T, Hilton AC, Elliott TS, Lambert PA. 2008. Physical and chemical factors influencing the germination of Clostridium difficile spores. J Appl Microbiol 105:2223–2230. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03965.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Errington J. 1993. Bacillus subtilis sporulation: regulation of gene expression and control of morphogenesis. Microbiol Rev 57:1–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Li J, Freedman JC, McClane BA. 2015. NanI sialidase, CcpA, and CodY work together to regulate epsilon toxin production by Clostridium perfringens type D strain CN3718. J Bacteriol 197:3339–3353. doi: 10.1128/JB.00349-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Chen J, McClane BA. 2012. Role of the Agr-like quorum-sensing system in regulating toxin production by Clostridium perfringens type B strains CN1793 and CN1795. Infect Immun 80:3008–3017. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00438-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Wu SB, Rodgers N, Choct M. 2011. Real-time PCR assay for Clostridium perfringens in broiler chickens in a challenge model of necrotic enteritis. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:1135–1139. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01803-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



