Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2016 Jul 7;113(29):7944–7945. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1608860113

Harnessing shared antigens and T-cell receptors in cancer: Opportunities and challenges

Kavita Dhodapkar a,1, Madhav Dhodapkar b,c,1
PMCID: PMC4961130  PMID: 27410048

Blockade of inhibitory immune checkpoints (ICPs) has led to impressive clinical regressions in some patients with tumors like lung cancer or melanoma, which often carry a high mutational load (1). Somatic mutations expressed by tumor cells can provide a rich source of neoantigens, and it has been suggested that T cells against these antigens may be targets of ICP blockade (2, 3). Because the targets of somatic mutations typically differ in individual tumors, neoantigen-specific T cells exhibit little shared reactivity. However, mutational loads in human cancers vary greatly, and several solid tumors (e.g., hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, ovarian cancer, colon cancer), as well as hematological or pediatric tumors, often carry a much lower mutational burden (4). Interestingly, even in tumor types that typically do not express high mutational burden, the degree of T-cell infiltration predicts improved survival (5). There is an unmet need to understand and harness the properties of T cells infiltrating such tumors better. In PNAS, Munson et al. (6) identify several shared T-cell receptors in T cells infiltrating HLA A2+ human breast cancers. These findings may set the stage for novel approaches to harness these T cells for therapy or prevention.

Most of the tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes (TILs) express αβ T-cell receptor (TCR), with each TCR participating in the recognition of specific antigens. Recent advances in high-throughput sequencing are providing novel insights into TCR diversity and clonality of TILs (7). Most of the current studies are based on sequencing isolated single (e.g., TCR-β) chains, although single-cell or computational methods to analyze αβ pairs are emerging (7). Munson et al. (6) adapt an emulsion-based RT-PCR–based approach (8), wherein initial amplification of TCRs from limited numbers of TCRs within a lipid droplet allows identification of dominant TCR α/β partners. Analysis of TCRs from TILs or blood of patients with breast cancer revealed several shared TCR sequences with an enrichment of TCRs from the TRBV7 family. Most of the breast cancers analyzed in this study were hormone receptor-positive and Her2-negative, which typically carry a lower mutational load than triple-negative cancers (9). Because most patients in this study were HLA A2+, the most immediate implication of shared TCR sequences is the possibility of shared antigenic targets recognized by these TCRs. Restricted TCR use is also a feature of emerging families of unconventional T cells that include autoreactive T cells and can recognize nonpeptide ligands (10). The findings of Munson et al. (6), although provocative, should be viewed as preliminary. In addition to the current limitation of small numbers of patients studied thus far, evaluation of TCRs from different regions of the same tumor, different lesions within the same patient, and lesions with different T-cell subsets will further refine the conclusions. Evaluation of functional properties of these T cells is also essential to understand their antitumor potential better.

Major families of shared tumor antigens may be classified based on whether they are restricted to a specific tissue or tumor type (versus multiple tumor types) and whether they represent tumor-associated self- versus altered self- or non–self-antigens (11) (Table 1). The best-studied examples of the former are melanocyte differentiation antigens (e.g., MelanA) studied in the context of melanoma. Increased levels of MelanA-specific T cells could be detected in tumor draining lymph nodes in melanoma (12), similar to the findings described by Munson et al. (6). Epitopes derived from viral oncoproteins in virus-induced malignancies or recurrent oncogenic mutations could, in principle, also be shared across several patients and provide an attractive target for immunotherapy. Tumor-associated alterations in self-proteins/oncogenic drivers (e.g., HER2 in breast cancer, SOX2 in lung cancer) (13, 14) or peptides resulting from tumor-associated alterations in signaling networks (e.g., phosphopeptides) may also serve as antigenic targets shared across several patients (15). A major class of potentially shared antigens is cancer/germ-line (C/G) genes, which are aberrantly expressed on a subset of diverse types of cancer cells (16). Several members of this family have been extensively studied and shown to be immunogenic. C/G antigens, such as MAGE and NY-ESO-1, have been explored both as targets for vaccines and adoptive cellular therapies (17, 18). One potential limitation of targeting C/G antigens is that they are often expressed by only a subset of tumor cells and their functional significance for most cancers is not known. Another distinct and growing class of shared antigens relates to genes implicated in regulating stemness, an essential functional property of cancer (19). For example, T cells against SOX2, an embryonal stem cell gene were recently correlated with reduced risk of progression to myeloma in a prospective trial (20). It is unlikely that the shared TCRs identified by Munson et al. (6) target viral antigens or oncogenic mutations. Identifying the nature of antigens recognized by these TCRs may provide a novel approach for immunotherapy, if these TCRs are found to mediate antitumor effects.

Table 1.

Broad classes of shared antigens in cancer

Type Example(s) Ref.
Differentiation antigens MelanA, gp110, tyrosinase (12)
Aberrantly expressed tumor-associated antigens Her2, Muc-1 (13)
C/G antigens MAGE family, NY-ESO-1 (16)
Stemness antigens SOX2, OCT4 (19)
Viral oncoproteins HPV E6 (11)
Recurrent somatic mutations B-Raf V600E (melanoma) (11)

Although most of the current efforts in cancer immunotherapy are directed toward targeting tumor-associated neoantigens (3), discovery of shared TCRs and/or antigens is particularly relevant for tumor types with lower mutational burden. Targeting shared antigens is also logistically simpler, particularly in the setting of cancer prevention. Shared TCRs may, in principle, also be exploited for adoptive cellular therapies (21). Adoptive transfer of TILs isolated from tumor tissue has yielded promising results in human melanoma. However, the ability to expand adequate TILs can be limited based on availability of tumor tissue. The finding by Munson et al. (6) that the tumor-bearing draining lymph nodes are further enriched for tumor-associated shared TCRs suggests the possibility that, in addition to tumors, tumor-draining lymph nodes may serve as a useful source for these TCRs. Because many of the shared antigens represent self-proteins, one of the potential limitations of TCRs against these antigens is the low affinity of these TCRs, which may then translate to reduced antitumor potential (22). In some instances, potent TCRs against these antigens may cross react with antigens expressed on normal tissues, leading to toxicity (23). Nonetheless, targeting shared TCRs or antigens may emerge as an important strategy for immunoprevention, as well as therapy of human cancers, particularly the subset with low mutational burden.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

See companion article on page 8272.

References

  • 1.Pardoll DM. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(4):252–264. doi: 10.1038/nrc3239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gubin MM, et al. Checkpoint blockade cancer immunotherapy targets tumour-specific mutant antigens. Nature. 2014;515(7528):577–581. doi: 10.1038/nature13988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schumacher TN, Schreiber RD. Neoantigens in cancer immunotherapy. Science. 2015;348(6230):69–74. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa4971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Alexandrov LB, et al. Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative; ICGC Breast Cancer Consortium; ICGC MMML-Seq Consortium; ICGC PedBrain Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature. 2013;500(7463):415–421. doi: 10.1038/nature12477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bindea G, Mlecnik B, Angell HK, Galon J. The immune landscape of human tumors: Implications for cancer immunotherapy. OncoImmunology. 2014;3(1):e27456. doi: 10.4161/onci.27456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Munson DJ, et al. Identification of shared TCR sequences from T cells in human breast cancer using emulsion RT-PCR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:8272–8277. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1606994113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kirsch I, Vignali M, Robins H. T-cell receptor profiling in cancer. Mol Oncol. 2015;9(10):2063–2070. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2015.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Turchaninova MA, et al. Pairing of T-cell receptor chains via emulsion PCR. Eur J Immunol. 2013;43(9):2507–2515. doi: 10.1002/eji.201343453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wood LD, et al. The genomic landscapes of human breast and colorectal cancers. Science. 2007;318(5853):1108–1113. doi: 10.1126/science.1145720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Godfrey DI, Uldrich AP, McCluskey J, Rossjohn J, Moody DB. The burgeoning family of unconventional T cells. Nat Immunol. 2015;16(11):1114–1123. doi: 10.1038/ni.3298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kvistborg P, van Buuren MM, Schumacher TN. Human cancer regression antigens. Curr Opin Immunol. 2013;25(2):284–290. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2013.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Romero P, et al. Ex vivo staining of metastatic lymph nodes by class I major histocompatibility complex tetramers reveals high numbers of antigen-experienced tumor-specific cytolytic T lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1998;188(9):1641–1650. doi: 10.1084/jem.188.9.1641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Disis ML, et al. Concurrent trastuzumab and HER2/neu-specific vaccination in patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(28):4685–4692. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dhodapkar KM, Gettinger SN, Das R, Zebroski H, Dhodapkar MV. SOX2-specific adaptive immunity and response to immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. OncoImmunology. 2013;2(7):e25205. doi: 10.4161/onci.25205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cobbold M, et al. MHC class I-associated phosphopeptides are the targets of memory-like immunity in leukemia. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(203):203ra125. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Scanlan MJ, Simpson AJ, Old LJ. The cancer/testis genes: Review, standardization, and commentary. Cancer Immun. 2004;4:1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dhodapkar MV, et al. Induction of antigen-specific immunity with a vaccine targeting NY-ESO-1 to the dendritic cell receptor DEC-205. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(232):232ra51. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rapoport AP, et al. NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-engineered T cells mediate sustained antigen-specific antitumor effects in myeloma. Nat Med. 2015;21(8):914–921. doi: 10.1038/nm.3910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dhodapkar MV, Dhodapkar KM. Vaccines targeting cancer stem cells: Are they within reach? Cancer J. 2011;17(5):397–402. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e318233e730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dhodapkar MV, et al. Prospective analysis of antigen-specific immunity, stem-cell antigens, and immune checkpoints in monoclonal gammopathy. Blood. 2015;126(22):2475–2478. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-03-632919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.June CH, Riddell SR, Schumacher TN. Adoptive cellular therapy: A race to the finish line. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(280):280ps7. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa3643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Engels B, et al. Relapse or eradication of cancer is predicted by peptide-major histocompatibility complex affinity. Cancer Cell. 2013;23(4):516–526. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.03.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Linette GP, et al. Cardiovascular toxicity and titin cross-reactivity of affinity-enhanced T cells in myeloma and melanoma. Blood. 2013;122(6):863–871. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-03-490565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES