Abstract
We have developed an efficient method for the synthesis of (E)-trisubstituted vinyl bromides via a Friedel–Crafts-type addition of alkynes to oxocarbenium ions formed in situ from acetals. The success of this reaction relies on identification of MgBr2·OEt2 as both a Lewis acid promoter and bromide source. This reaction employs simple, inexpensive starting materials and proceeds under mild conditions to allow the preparation of a range of vinyl bromide products in high yields and E:Z selectivities. Furthermore, the vinyl bromide products also contain an allylic ether functional group. Both the vinyl bromide and allylic ether are effective handles for the elaboration of these useful synthetic intermediates.
Keywords: trisubstituted vinyl bromide, stereoselective, oxocarbenium ion, Friedel–Crafts, alkyne, vinylation
Graphical abstract
Vinyl bromides are versatile synthetic intermediates, allowing access to a wide range of organic molecules. In particular, highly substituted vinyl bromides undergo stereospecific coupling reactions, providing tri- and tetrasubstituted olefins with excellent control over olefin stereochemistry.1 Popular methods for the preparation of trisubstituted vinyl halides include carbometallation,2 cross couplings of dihaloalkenes,3 dehydrobromination of dibromides,4 and bromination of α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds.5,6 In the course of our research program investigating the metal-catalyzed addition of alkynes to oxocarbenium ion intermediates,7 we discovered a three-component coupling of benzylic acetals, terminal alkynes and MgBr2 to deliver trisubstituted vinyl bromides (Scheme 1B).8 In addition to a vinyl bromide group, this 1-bromo-3-methoxy propene product also contains an allylic ether functionality to enable elaboration. Enticed by the simplicity of the starting materials, the incorporation of multiple functional group handles, and the possibility for control of the olefin stereochemistry, we pursued the development of this reaction.
Scheme 1.
Formation of trisubstituted vinyl halides from benzylic oxocarbenium ions
The Friedel–Crafts-type addition of alkynes to cationic intermediates has been previously described. In particular, the stereoselective preparation of trisubstituted vinyl bromides has been accomplished via three-component couplings of terminal alkynes, metal bromides, and several classes of carbocationic intermediates.9,10,11 However, to our knowledge, previous Lewis acid-catalyzed additions to benzylic oxocarbenium ions have resulted in the addition of two equivalents of alkyne, delivering a 1,4-diene scaffold (Scheme 1A).12 To maintain an oxygen functional group at the allylic position, vinylations of acid chlorides have been accomplished.13 In addition, via gold catalysis, the adducts of alkyne additions to aldehydes or oxocarbenium ions can be trapped with oxygen nucleophiles, ultimately delivering ketone or enol products.14 Herein, we report the formation of 3-methoxy-1-bromopropenes via the addition of a single equivalent of alkyne to a benzylic oxocarbenium ion intermediate (Scheme 1B). This reaction proceeds under mild conditions, tolerates a broad range of functional groups, and delivers products with multiple functional group handles for further elaboration.
We selected the reaction of dimethyl benzaldehyde acetal (1A) and phenyl acetylene (2a) for optimization studies. Based on previous reports,8 we expected that use of a halogenated solvent would stabilize the carbocation intermediates. Indeed, when CH2Cl2 was used as solvent, the reaction yielded 30% of desired product 3Aa in a 1:1 E:Z ratio (Table 1, entry 1).15 The use of CHCl3 as solvent resulted in an increased yield and E:Z ratio (entry 2). In contrast, nonpolar solvents gave only trace product (entry 3), and ethereal solvents (Et2O or THF) gave no product (not shown). Increasing the equivalents of alkyne further increased the yield (entry 4). The addition of K2CO3 led to an even higher yield of 95%, suggesting that adventitious acid or water may cause slight decomposition of acetal 1A (entry 5). The yield and E:Z selectivity were sensistive to reaction temperature. Increasing the reaction temperature to 70 °C resulted in a loss in E:Z selectivity (entry 6), whereas reducing the temperature to 50 °C led to only 12% yield (entry 7). Notably, MgBr2 must be used as its etherate; MgBr2 provides only trace product, likely due to low solubility (not shown).
Table 1.
Reaction Optimizationa
![]() | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Entry | Solvent | Equiv 2a | Base | Temp (°C) | Yield (%)b | E:Zc |
1 | CH2Cl2 | 1.0 | None | 60 | 30 | 1:1 |
2 | CHCl3 | 1.0 | None | 60 | 83 | 10:1 |
3 | PhMe | 1.0 | None | 60 | <1 | N.D.d |
4 | CHCl3 | 1.5 | None | 60 | 87 | 10:1 |
5 | CHCl3 | 1.5 | K2CO3 | 60 | 95 | 10:1 |
6 | CHCl3 | 1.5 | K2CO3 | 70 | 90 | 4:1 |
7 | CHCl3 | 1.5 | K2CO3 | 50 | 12 | 16:1 |
Conditions: Substrate 1A (0.1 mmol, 1.0 equiv), alkyne 2a, MgBr2·OEt2 (0.12 mmol, 1.2 equiv), base (1.0 equiv), solvent (0.5 mL, 0.2M), 24 h.
Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as internal standard.
E:Z ratio was determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy of the crude reaction mixture.
N.D. = not determined.
A range of benzylic acetals successfully underwent vinylation under our optimized conditions (Scheme 2).16 Substituents were tolerated at the ortho (3Fa, 3Ga), meta (3Ea), and para (3Ba, 3Ca, 3Da) positions of the phenyl group. A variety of functional groups can be utilized, including bromide (3Ba), fluoride (3Ca), trifluoromethyl (3Da), and silyl-protected phenol (3Ea). Larger aryl groups can also be used (3Fa). In addition, isochroman acetal 1G smoothly underwent the vinylation, providing isochroman 3Ga in 87% yield and a 16:1 ratio of olefin isomers. A limitation of this method is that electron-donating substituents on the acetal result in over-vinylation to give symmetric diene products (see Scheme 1A above). In addition, strongly Lewis basic substituents inhibit the reaction; complete recovery of starting material was observed with pyridyl or amino-substituted acetals.
Scheme 2. Scope of Acetals.
Conditions: acetal 1 (0.1 mmol), alkyne 2a (1.5 equiv), MgBr2·OEt2 (1.2 equiv), K2CO3 (1.0 equiv), solvent (0.5 mL), 60 °C, 24 h. Average isolated yields from duplicate experiments (±2%). E:Z ratios of isolated product mixtures determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy. a 0.2 mmol scale.
With respect to the alkyne component, various aryl acetylenes can be employed (Scheme 3). O-, m-, and p-tolyl acetylene all resulted in high yields of the vinyl bromide products (3Aa, 3Ab, 3Ac). Both electron-donating (3Ae) and electron-withdrawing (3Af) aryl substituents are tolerated. In addition, larger aryl groups, such as 2-naphthyl, can be used (3Ag). Notably, the reaction scale can be increased without detriment to yield or E:Z selectivity; using 10 g of benzaldehyde dimethyl acetal 1A, 89% yield of vinyl bromide 3Aa was obtained with 10:1 E:Z selectivity.
Scheme 3. Scope of Alkynes.
Conditions: acetal 1A (0.1 mmol), alkyne 2 (1.5 equiv), MgBr2·OEt2 (1.2 equiv), K2CO3 (1.0 equiv), CHCl3 (0.5 mL, 0.2 M), 60 °C, 24 h. Average isolated yields from duplicate experiments (±4%). E:Z ratios of isolated product mixtures determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy. a 0.2 mmol scale. b 3.0 equiv 2e, CHCl3 (0.1 M). Result of a single experiment.
Investigation of non-aryl acetylenes suggests that this Lewis-acid mediated process may also enable entry to other useful motifs. For example, the addition of cyclohexenyl acetylene 2h to acetal 1A results in triene 4 in 85% yield (Scheme 4). This reaction likely proceeds via elimination of the expected product 3Ah. Similarly, addition of cyclopropyl acetylene resulted in ring-opening to give dibromide 5 (Scheme 5).
Scheme 4.
Triene Synthesis via Addition of 1-Cyclohexenylacetylene.
Scheme 5.
Dibromide Synthesis via Addition of Cyclopropylacetylene.
Consistent with the proposed Friedel–Crafts-type mechanism, as well as previous examples of divinylation of oxocarbenium ion intermediates,9, 12 the alkyne substituent must be able to stabilize the putative vinyl cation intermediate. Thus, other alkyl-substituted alkynes do not participate in this reaction. In addition, similar to the acetal scope, Lewis basic groups (pyridyl and amino) are not tolerated on the alkyne. Finally, only trace product (<5%) was observed with internal alkynes.
Assignment of the olefin configuration of the major isomer of the vinyl bromide products was made via the following analysis. First, the E configuration of the major isomer of vinyl bromide 3Ba was determined by X-ray crystallography (Figure 1).17 Secondly, in product 3Ad, an nOe correlation is observed between the ortho methyl and the benzylic proton, consistent with an E olefin geometry. Finally, for bromides 3Ba, 3Ad, and all other products, we observed a consistent upfield chemical shift of the benzylic proton of the major isomer. We thus assign the configuration of the major isomer of the other products as E. Formation of the E isomer may be favored due to minimization of steric hindrance in the approach of the bromide anion to the vinyl cation or due to antiperiplanar addition of halide simultaneously with attack of the alkyne on the carbocation.9b, 9c, 10, 18
Figure 1.
Molecular diagram of 3Ba with ellipsoids at 30% probability. Vinyl H-atom depicted with arbitrary radius. All other H-atoms and a second symmetry-unique compound molecule are omitted for clarity.
Both the vinyl bromide and the allylic ether can be harnessed for further elaboration. For example, Suzuki–Miyaura cross coupling of vinyl bromide 3Aa produced trisubstituted olefin 6 (Scheme 6).19 The isomers of 6 could be separated, allowing isolation of (E)-6 as a single isomer in 76% yield. An nOe correlation was observed between Hb and Hc, consistent with the assignment of the major isomer at 3Aa as E. Via Lewis acid catalysis, allylic ether 6 was then cyclized to provide indene 7 in 96% yield.20 This method provides an efficient route to highly substituted indenes, many of which possess biological activity.21
Scheme 6.
Scale up and Functionalization of Vinyl Bromide
In summary, we have developed an efficient method for the synthesis of (E)-trisubstituted vinyl bromides via a Friedel–Crafts-type addition of terminal alkynes to oxocarbenium ions formed in situ from benzylic acetals. The success of this reaction relied identification of MgBr2·OEt2 as both a Lewis acid promoter and bromide source. The mild reaction conditions allow the preparation of a range of vinyl bromide products in high yields and E:Z selectivities. Furthermore, the 1-bromo-3-methoxy propene products contain useful functional group handles for downstream elaboration.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgement is gratefully made to the Donors of the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund, the National Science Foundation (CAREER CHE 1151364), and the University of Delaware for support of this research. Acknowledgement is also made to Dr. Shi Bai for assistance with NMR experiments. NMR and other data were acquired at UD on instruments obtained with the assistance of NSF and NIH funding (NSF CHE 0421224, CHE 1229234, and CHE 0840401; NIH P20 GM103541 and S10 RR02682).
Footnotes
Primary Data
YES (this text will be updated with links prior to publication)
YES (this text will be updated with links prior to publication)
References and Notes
- 1.(a) Xu S, Kamada H, Kim EH, Oda A, Negishi E-i. In: Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions and More. de Meijiere A, Brase S, Oestreich M, editors. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2014. p. 133. [Google Scholar]; (b) Chemla F, Ferreira F, Jackowski O, Micouin L, Perez-Luna A. In: Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions and More. de Meijere A, Brase S, Oestreich M, editors. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2014. p. 279. [Google Scholar]
- 2.(a) Creton I, Marek I, Normant JF. Synthesis. 1996;1996:1499. [Google Scholar]; (b) Fallis AG, Forgione P. Tetrahedron. 2001;57:5899. [Google Scholar]; (c) Knochel P. In: Comprehensive Organic Synthesis. Trost BM, Fleming I, editors. Vol. 4. Elsevier, Ltd; 1991. p. 865. [Google Scholar]; (d) Lim DSW, Anderson EA. Synthesis. 2012;44:983. [Google Scholar]; (e) Lipshutz BH, Butler T, Lower A. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:15396. doi: 10.1021/ja065769b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Marek I, Minko Y. In: Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions and More. de Meijere A, Brase S, Oestreich M, editors. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2014. p. 763. [Google Scholar]; (g) Murakami K, Ohmiya H, Yorimitsu H, Oshima K. Org Lett. 2007;9:1569. doi: 10.1021/ol0703938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Stüdemann T, Knochel P. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 1997;36:93. [Google Scholar]; (i) Zhang D, Ready JM. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:15050. doi: 10.1021/ja0647708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tan Z, Negishi E-i. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2006;45:762. doi: 10.1002/anie.200503519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.(a) Nunes C, Steffens D, Monteiro A. Synlett. 2007;2007:103. [Google Scholar]; (b) Kutsumura N, Niwa K, Saito T. Org Lett. 2010;12:3316. doi: 10.1021/ol101110v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Li W, Li J, Wan ZK, Wu J, Massefski W. Org Lett. 2007;9:4607. doi: 10.1021/ol7021142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.(a) Kuhl N, Schröder N, Glorius F. Org Lett. 2013;15:3860. doi: 10.1021/ol4015915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Jyothi D, HariPrasad S. Synlett. 2009;2009:2309. [Google Scholar]; (c) Kim K-M, Park I-H. Synthesis. 2004:2641. [Google Scholar]
- 6.For other methods, see: Stanforth SP. In: Comprehensive Functional Group Transformations II. Katritzky AR, Taylor RJK, editors. Vol. 2. Elsevier; Oxford: 2005. p. 561.Huang X, Fu WJ. Synthesis. 2006;2006:1016.Hodgson DM, Arif T. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:16500. doi: 10.1021/ja8076999.Imazaki Y, Shirakawa E, Ueno R, Hayashi T. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:14760. doi: 10.1021/ja307771d.Pan J, Wang X, Zhang Y, Buchwald SL. Org Lett. 2011;13:4974. doi: 10.1021/ol202098h.
- 7.(a) Maity P, Srinivas HD, Watson MP. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:17142. doi: 10.1021/ja207585p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Srinivas HD, Maity P, Yap GPA, Watson MP. J Org Chem. 2015;80:4003. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.5b00364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.MgBr2 has been previously employed as both Lewis acid and bromide source. See: Wang Y, Lam HW. J Org Chem. 2009;74:1353. doi: 10.1021/jo802475x.Wei HX, Jasoni RL, Hu J, Li G, Paré PW. Tetrahedron. 2004;60:10233.
- 9.For three-component couplings of alkynes, metal halides, and non-oxocarbenium, benzylic carbocations, see: Liu ZQ, Wang J, Han J, Zhao Y, Zhou B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:1240.Marcuzzi F, Melloni G, Modena G. J Org Chem. 1979;44:3022.Yao ML, Quick TR, Wu Z, Quinn MP, Kabalka GW. Org Lett. 2009;11:2647. doi: 10.1021/ol900669t.
- 10.For a three-component coupling of alkynes, metal halides and nonbenzylic oxocarbenium ions derived from glycals, see: Tatina M, Kusunuru AK, Yousuf SK, Mukherjee D. Chem Commun. 2013;49:11409. doi: 10.1039/c3cc46914j.
- 11.For examples of intramolecular Prins cyclizations of alkynes with trapping by a metal halide, see: Melany ML, Lock GA, Thompson DW. J Org Chem. 1985;50:3925.Kim YH, Lee KY, Oh CY, Yang JG, Ham WH. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002;43:837.Miranda PO, Díaz DD, Padrón JI, Bermejo J, Martín VS. Org Lett. 2003;5:1979. doi: 10.1021/ol034568z.Takami K, Yorimitsu H, Shinokubo H, Matsubara S, Oshima K. Synlett. 2001;2001:293. doi: 10.1021/ol015975i.Xu T, Yu Z, Wang L. Org Lett. 2009;11:2113. doi: 10.1021/ol9005689.
- 12.For examples of divinylation of benzylic oxocarbenium ions, see: Kabalka GW, Wu Z, Ju Y. Org Lett. 2002;4:3415. doi: 10.1021/ol026507r.Kabalka GW, Yao ML, Borella S, Wu Z, Ju YH, Quick T. J Org Chem. 2008;73:2668. doi: 10.1021/jo702493j.Miranda PO, Díaz DD, Padrón JI, Ramírez MA, Martín VS. J Org Chem. 2005;70:57. doi: 10.1021/jo048410j.Shimizu M, Okura K, Arai T, Hachiya I. Chem Lett. 2010;39:1052.Shimizu M, Toyoda T, Baba T. Synlett. 2005;2005:2516.Yadav JS, Reddy BVS, Eeshwaraiah B, Gupta MK, Biswas SK. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005;46:1161.
- 13.(a) Price CC, Pappalardo JA. J Am Chem Soc. 1950;72:2613. [Google Scholar]; (b) Martens H, Janssens F, Hoornaert G. Tetrahedron. 1975;31:177. [Google Scholar]; (c) Kokubo K, Matsumasa K, Miura M, Nomura M. J Org Chem. 1996;61:6941. doi: 10.1021/jo960915p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Zhou H, Zeng C, Ren L, Liao W, Huang X. Synlett. 2006;2006:3504. [Google Scholar]; (e) Iwai T, Fujihara T, Terao J, Tsuji Y. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:6668. doi: 10.1021/ja901778y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.(a) Zi W, Toste FD. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:12600. doi: 10.1021/ja407150h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Zhang M, Wang Y, Yang Y, Hu X. Adv Synth Catal. 2012;354:981. doi: 10.1002/adsc.201100831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Schultz DM, Babij NR, Wolfe JP. Adv Synth Catal. 2012;354:3451. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Reactions were conducted in 1-dram vials, capped with Teflon-lined caps, and heated using aluminum heating blocks deep enough to completely enclose the glass of the vial.
- 16.Typical procedure for the formation of vinyl bromides, described for vinyl bromide 3Ba: In a N2-atmosphere glovebox, MgBr2·OEt2 (30.9 mg, 0.12 mmol, 1.2 equiv) was weighed into a 1-dram vial equipped with a magnetic stirbar. Na2CO3 (13.3 mg, 0.10 mmol, 1.0 equiv), acetal 1B (23.1 mg, 0.10 mmol, 1.0 equiv), alkyne 2a (15.3 mg, 0.30 mmol, 1.5 equiv), and then CHCl3 (0.5 mL) were added. The vial was capped with a Teflon-lined cap and heated in an aluminum heating block at 60 °C with vigorous stirring (700 rpm) for 24 h. The vial was removed from the glovebox, and the reaction mixture was filtered through a plug of silica gel, which was then rinsed with Et2O, to remove insoluble salts. A minimal amount of silica gel was added to the filtrate. The mixture was concentrated and then loaded directly onto a silica gel column and purified via chromatography (5% Et2O/hexanes) to give 3Ba (run 1: 34.8 mg, 91%; run 2: 34.2 mg, 90%) as a yellow solid (mp 73–82 °C). 1H NMR analysis showed 3Ba was isolated as a 13:1 ratio of olefin isomers: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, major isomer) δ 7.54–7.49 (m, 2H), 7.46–7.34 (m, 5H), 7.18 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 6.33 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 4.58 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 3.26 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3, major isomer) δ 139.1, 138.1, 133.8, 131.8, 129.1, 128.7, 128.5, 128.4, 125.0, 121.9, 80.0, 56.0; FTIR (thin film) 1010, 1071, 1443, 1485, 2820, 2902, 2925 cm−1; HRMS (EI+) [M]+ calculated for C16H14Br2: 365.9554, found: 365.9550.(E)-(1-Bromo-3-methoxyprop-1-ene-1,3-diyl)dibenzene (3Aa): 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, major isomer) δ 7.47–7.26 (m, 10H), 6.42 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 4.63 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 3.27 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3, major isomer) δ 140.0, 138.3, 134.3, 129.0, 128.8, 128.7, 128.4, 128.1, 126.7, 124.5, 80.6, 56.0; FTIR (thin film) 700, 768, 1088, 1099, 1444, 2819, 2889, 3029, 3060 cm−1; HRMS (EI+) [M]+ calculated for C16H15O: 223.1119, found: 223.1123.(E)-(3-(3-Bromo-1-methoxy-3-phenylallyl)phenoxy)(tert-butyl)dimethylsilane (3Ea): 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, major isomer) δ 7.39 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 5H), 7.21 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (m, 2H), 6.35 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 4.51 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 3.22 (s, 3H), 0.98 (s, 9H), 0.21 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3, major isomer) δ 155.9, 141.5, 138.2, 134.3, 129.7, 129.0, 128.8, 128.3, 128.2, 124.4, 119.7, 118.4, 80.5, 56.1, 25.7, 18.2,–4.3; FTIR (thin film) 699, 782, 1257, 1277, 1444, 1600, 2857, 2895, 2929, 3060 cm−1; HRMS (EI+) [M]+ calculated for C15H26O3Si: 282.1651, found: 282.1655.
- 17.CCDC 973170 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
- 18.Antiperiplanar addition of halide and a cation across an alkyne has been proposed, particularly for reactions conducted at low temperatures. See: Yeh MCP, Fang CW, Lin HH. Org Lett. 2012;14:1830. doi: 10.1021/ol300434m.
- 19.Kuznetsov A, Gevorgyan V. Org Lett. 2012;14:914. doi: 10.1021/ol203428c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wang J, Zhang L, Jing Y, Huang W, Zhou X. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:4978. [Google Scholar]
- 21.(a) Karaguni IM, Glüsenkamp KH, Langerak A, Geisen C, Ullrich V, Winde G, Möröy T, Müller O. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2002;12:709. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(01)00839-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kolanos R, Siripurapu U, Pullagurla M, Riaz M, Setola V, Roth BL, Dukat M, Glennon RA. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2005;15:1987. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.02.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.