Abstract
Introduction
Published literature till date reveals a high prevalence of Porphyromonas gingivalis fimA type I genotype among healthy subjects. Quite a few studies have reported its prevalence also in periodontitis patients. Nevertheless incidence of this genotype in gingivitis is lacking in adult population.
Aim
The present study was chosen to detect P. gingivalis fimA type I genotype among chronic gingivitis patients.
Materials and Methods
A total of 46 subgingival plaque samples collected from chronic marginal gingivitis (n=23) and chronic periodontitis subjects (control group) (n=23) were subjected to Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction to detect the P. gingivalis fimA type I gene. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test.
Results
Prevalence of P. gingivalis fimA type I gene among chronic periodontitis and chronic gingivitis patients were 8.7% and 30.4% respectively. P. gingivalis fimA type I genotype prevalence was found to be statistically insignificant between the two study groups (p=0.135).
Conclusion
The avirulent P. gingivalis fimA type I genotype, occurred in high prevalence among chronic gingivitis patients, while its presence was low in chronic periodontitis patients. Presence of this avirulent genotype in chronic marginal gingivitis signifies its reversible condition.
Keywords: Fimbriae, Periodontitis, Polymerase chain reaction, P. gingivalis
Introduction
The fimbriae of P. gingivalis, encoded by fimA gene are an important virulence factor which assists in the pathogenesis of periodontitis [1, 2]. Based on the genetic diversity fimA gene of P. gingivalis is classified into six genotypes (genotypes I, Ib, II, III, IV and V). The diversity in the P. gingivalis genotype is related to the diverse morphological features of fimA fimbriae, especially with regard to its size and virulence capacity [3]. Many studies have reported a preponderance of P. gingivalis fimA type I and P. gingivalis fimA type II genotype among healthy subjects and chronic periodontitis respectively [4–6]. While, very low prevalence of P. gingivalis fimA type I has been reported among chronic periodontitis patients [1, 7,8]. Missailidis et al., have reported P. gingivalis type 1b as the second most prevalent genotype among periodontitis patients [9]. The findings of Missailidis et al., suggest the virulence determinants of P. gingivalis are reliant on cell-surface components. Kato et al., has reported higher virulence capacity for P. gingivalis strains with type II fimbriae when compared to type I strains [10]. The fimbrillin gene that encodes for fimA type I has been recognized as a highly specific marker for P. gingivalis. The competent interaction of P. gingivalis fimA type I with saliva or Streptococcus gordonii is an added feature [11]. Gingivitis is a common and mild form of gum disease that causes irritation, redness and swelling (inflammation) of the gums. This inflammation of the gum tissue is caused by the bacteria that reside in the dentinal biofilm or dental plaque. In rare occasions these bacteria can gain entry into the bone at the root of the teeth which may lead to periodontitis. Gingivitis although reversible, usually precedes the formation of periodontitis. A very low prevalence of P. gingivalis fimA type I genotype has been reported by several studies among chronic periodontitis patients. In view of the fact that gingivitis precedes periodontitis, the present study was selected to detect if P. gingivalis fimA type I genotype occurred in low prevalence among chronic gingivitis patients as well.
Few studies have mentioned the advantage of Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in bringing important contribution to the detection of pathogenic bacteria in mixed oral infections [11–14]. Hence, in the present study detection of P. gingivalis fimA type I genotype was performed by real-time PCR assay.
Materials and Methods
Study population: This comparative study comprised 23 chronic marginal gingivitis patients. Chronic generalized periodontitis (n=23) were included as control group. The subgingival plaque samples from the two groups were collected from the Department of Periodontics and Implantology, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, Chennai. The period of study was from July 2014 to January 2015. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, Dr A.L.M Post Graduate Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Madras, Chennai. Informed consent was obtained from both the study subjects.
Subject Selection (Inclusion & Exclusion Criteria): Either sex, presence of no less than 14 teeth, a minimum three teeth with probing depth >4 mm, Bleeding On Probing (BOP) were the inclusion criteria for chronic periodontitis patients. The chronic marginal gingivitis group was selected by measuring Gingival Index Score [15]. Gingivitis patients showing symptoms of chronic generalized marginal gingivitis with probing depth 3mm and Gingival Index Score as classified by LÖe and Silness for mild to moderate condition were recruited for the study population. The exclusion criteria for both the groups included pregnancy, lactation, antibiotic and antiinflammatory therapy for the past six months, smoking, paan chewing, presence of diabetes or other systemic illness and periodontal therapy for the past one year.
Sample Collection: The Probing Depth (PD) and Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) (mm) was measured with a graduated William’s probe. SubGingival Plaque (SGP) samples were collected from the mesio-buccal aspect of the tooth from three different sites and pooled in 500 μl of freshly prepared Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS). Following the removal of supragingival plaque with the help of sterile cotton roll, the SGP was collected using Gracey curette from chronic periodontitis patients and chronic gingivitis subjects [16]. The samples were then transported in ice to the laboratory and stored at -20oC until assayed.
DNA Extraction
The subgingival plaque samples in PBS were transferred to fresh Eppendorf tube containing 100μl of lysis buffer(10mmol/L Tris-HCl, 1.0mmol/L EDTA, 1.0% Triton X-100, pH 8.0) following centrifugation and boiled for 10 minutes. The samples were then centrifuged and 10μl of the supernatant was used as template for PCR assay [17]. The extracted samples were stored at -20oC until assayed.
PCR Primer Designing: Primers targeting the fimA type I gene of P. gingivalis spanning positions 190455-190600 (forward 5’-CGAATCAAAGGTGGCTAAGTTGACCG-3’,reverse5’ GAGTCTTGCCAACCAGTTCCATTGC -3’) were designed based on the complete gene sequence acquired from the Gen Bank database (NCBI) (accession no: GI 3005672). The length of the amplicon is 170 bp. Sequences were aligned with ClustalW2 (Multiple sequence alignment) and searched for conserved domains (http://www.ebi.ac.uk). The oligocalculator tool (http://trishul.sci. gu.edu.au/tools/OligoCalculator.html) was used for checking the design of the candidate oligonucleotide sequences for tm, Guanine-Cytosine (GC) content and primer dimers. Validation of primer specificity was performed by submitting the primer sequences to the BLASTN program (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) and it was found that the primers possessed100% nucleotide identity and coverage threshold with the corresponding taxa. In silico PCR was performed using the NCBI primer designing tool (hhttp://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/) and it was observed that the primers were specific only for the intended target.
Real-time PCR assay for detection of P. gingivalis fimA Type I gene
Optimization of the Real-time PCR Assay: Reactions were conducted in an Applied Biosystems 7900 HT Fast Real-time PCR system, USA. SDS 2.3 software was used for conducting the experiment. Reaction optimization was performed with primer concentrations as stated by the kit manufacturer (Quantifast SYBR Green PCR Kit, QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden). Optimal reactions were performed in total volumes of 20μl containing 4μl DNA, 10μl of 2x QuantiFast SYBR Green PCR Master Mix and 0.5μM of each primer. PCR was carried out using the following conditions: Stage 1- 50oC for 2 minutes, Stage 2- 95oC for 10 minutes, Stage 3- 40 cycles of 95oC for 0.15 seconds, 60oC for 1 minute, Stage 4- 95oC for 0.15 seconds, 60oC for 0.15 seconds and 95oC for 0.15 seconds.
Data was collected at all stages. No Template Control (NTC) was included that contained all the components of the reaction except the template to rule out any contamination. Real-time PCR amplification assays were conducted in duplicate.
Melting Curve Analysis: Reaction specificities were verified by melting curve analysis with a progressive temperature increase from 60oC to 95oC at a 0.1oC/s transition rate and continuous fluorescence acquisition. To minimize potential primer-dimer artifacts during the analysis of clinical samples, fluorescence acquisition temperatures were set to approximately 4oC below the denaturing temperature of each amplification product, as previously established by melting curve analysis [Table/Fig-1]. Only 10μl of each real-time PCR product was subjected to 2.0% agarose gel electrophoresis, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized under ultraviolet light to verify the size (170 bp) of the amplicon.
Sequencing of Selected PCR Product: A representative amplified product of P. gingivalis type I fimA gene was sequenced by genome biotech, Pune [Applied Biosystem (ABI) 3130 Genetic Analyser, ABI PRISM Big Dye Terminators V 3.1]. Nucleotide sequences were visualized with Bioedit and submitted to the BLASTN program for comparison with sequences from the GenBank database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank). A 99% minimum nucleotide identity was required for positive identification at the species level. The sequences of P. gingivalis fimA type I was submitted to GenBank under accession no. HQ706664.
Statistical Analysis
Standard deviation for all the samples was obtained by the SDS 2.3 software in the Applied Biosystems 7900 HT Fast Real-time PCR system, USA. The samples showing standard deviation value of ≤ 0.1 was recorded positive. The odds ratio was calculated using chi-square test with 95% confidence interval to analyze the association of P. gingivalis fimA type I genotype to chronic periodontitis and chronic gingivitis. The p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Fisher’s exact test was used to calculate the p value for the prevalence of P. gingivalis fimA type I in the two groups. Unpaired t-test was used to compare the means of age, PD and CAL.
Results
[Table/Fig-2] depicts the results of real - time PCR assay and the clinical parameters of the gingivitis and chronic periodontitis group. Statistical analysis revealed insignificance (p=0.4) between the two groups with respect to male: female ratio. The subjects with periodontitis presented significantly higher mean PD (p<0.0001) and CAL (p<0.0001), than subjects with marginal gingivitis.
[Table/Fig-2]:
Chronic Periodontitis | Marginal gingivitis | p value | |
---|---|---|---|
Age ¥ | 37.13±12.03 | 35.30 ± 10.13 | 0.0001** |
Gender%(Male/Female)§ | 19/4 | 16/7 | 0.4 |
Mean PD(mm) ¥ | 5.27±1.00 | 2.17±0.38 | 0.0001** |
Mean CAL(mm) ¥ | 6.28±1.32 | 3.21±0.42 | 0.0001** |
Real-time PCR (no of positive samples)& | 2 | 7 | 0.06& |
Odds Ratio | 0.21 | 4.59 |
§ Refers to Chi-square test; ¥ Unpaired t-test; & Fisher’s exact test; ** significant p value.
Out of the 23 SGP samples of chronic periodontitis patients, two showed amplification of specific P. gingivalis fimA type I gene after 30 cycles (Standard deviation for two samples = 0.24724083 & 0.49709812). Among 23 SGP samples of chronic gingivitis subjects, seven samples were positive for P. gingivalis fimA type I genotype and the number of cycles required to amplify P. gingivalis fimA type I gene in them ranged between 24 - 30 cycles (Standard deviation for seven samples = 0.23106992, 0.8157472, 0.083577536, 0.20680279, 0.64406186, 0.8770159, 0.62718827 & 0.159102). Among the seven positive samples of chronic gingivitis group two samples amplified following 26 cycles, a further two samples after 25 cycles, one sample each after 24, 28 and 31 cycles respectively. Evidence of nonspecific or cross-reaction products was not observed in the assay. The association between two study groups with respect to the outcome for P. gingivalis fimA type I genotype was considered to be statistically insignificant (p=0.06). Nevertheless the odds ratio tested showed an association of P. gingivalis fimA type I genotype to chronic marginal gingivitis. Statistical significance was observed between two groups in regard to pocket probing depth and clinical attachment level. The mean pocket probing depth and clinical attachment level for the P. gingivalis fimA type I gene positive samples among chronic periodontitis was 4.95 ± 0.91 and 5.7500 ± 1.76 respectively. While, the mean pocket probing depth and clinical attachment level in gingivitis was 2.10±0.27 and 3.01±0.23 respectively.
Discussion
Real-time PCR is a DNA amplification technique that allows precise determination of nucleic acid levels by monitoring fluorescent signals at a cycle-to-cycle rate [18]. As SYBR Green I can bind even to non specific double-stranded DNA, the reaction was standardized to evade such non specific product detection. In this regard, we have used preventive procedures to minimize such technical limitation, including preliminary evaluation of primer sequences and melting curve analysis of amplification products. The evidence of well-defined unique peaks in the dissociation profiles ensured satisfactory reaction specificities for all markers, with no evidence of primer-dimer formation. As an additional precaution, monitoring of reaction products was conducted by fluorescence acquisition at temperatures in which double-stranded DNA was presumably composed only by the target gene products. In the absence of the probe, the specificity of the SYBR Green Real-Time PCR was determined by the definition of the melting temperature of the PCR product obtained [Table/Fig-1]. Although a real-time PCR kit for the detection of P.gingivalis fimA type I gene is commercially available, in the present study we have designed a primer to detect the target gene. The gene sequence result reveals the primer pair target specificity.
The number of cycles required for the detection of P. gingivalis fimA type I genotype in marginal gingivitis was below 30 suggesting the presence of P. gingivalis fimA type I genotype in higher numbers among subjects with marginal gingivitis. While, among periodontitis this genotype was detected above 30 cycles. As there are hardly any reports available with regard to prevalence of P. gingivalis fimA type I genotype among adult gingivitis subjects, its comparison with diverse population was hampered. The high prevalence of fimA type I among adult gingivitis subjects is different from Hayashi et al., study who has reported a very low prevalence among children with gingivitis [19]. The low prevalence of P. gingivalis fimA type I genotype among chronic periodontitis was well in concurrence with observations of Van der Ploeg et al., Amano et al., and Fabrizi et al., [4,8,20]. Compared to the present study Beikler et al., [21], reported a high prevalence of P. gingivalis fimA type I genotype among Caucasian periodontitis patients. Amano et al., has reported a high prevalence of P. gingivalis fimA type I genotype in healthy subjects [4]. Alternatively two studies have reported type 1b as the second most prevalent genotype among periodontitis patients [9, 22]. Moreno et al., has reported P. gingivalis fimA type I genotype as the second most prevalent among health next to type II [23]. Conversely Hayashi et al., has reported a higher prevalence of Type II fimA among children with gingivitis [19].
Limitation
The main limitation of the study is lack of healthy group. Nevertheless several studies have reported the presence of P. gingivalis fimA type I genotype among healthy individuals.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the low prevalence of P. gingivalis fimA type I genotype among chronic periodontitis patients signifies its avirulence. The chronic marginal gingivitis patients who harbor this avirulent strain may not progress to periodontitis. Screening of this genotype among children and adults with gingivitis may perhaps help in assessing the subject’s risk to periodontitis. The low sample size is the main limitation of the present study. Further studies with large sample size might aid in close association of this genotype to clinical conditions of chronic marginal gingivitis.
Acknowledgments
The authors sincerely thank Dr. K. Munirajan, Professor and Mr. Manikandan, Research Scholar, Department of Genetics, Dr.A.L.M. Post Graduate Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Madras University, Chennai, India for providing lab facilities and for helping us in performing the Real-time PCR assay. This work was supported by the funds which were generated through the university-industry collaborative research programme of the University of Madras.
Financial or Other Competing Interests
As declared above.
References
- [1].Amano A, Nakagawa I, Kataoka K, Morisaki I, Hamada S. Distribution of Porphyromonas gingivalis strains with fimA genotypes in periodontitis patients. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37(5):1426–30. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.5.1426-1430.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Nagano K, Hasegawa Y, Abiko Y, Yoshida Y, Murakami Y, Yoshimura F. Porphyromonas gingivalis fimA fimbriae: fimbrial assembly by fimA alone in the fim gene cluster and differential antigenicity among fimA genotypes. >PLoS ONE. 7;(9):e43722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Nakagawa I, Amano A, Kimura RK, Nakamura T, Kawabata S, Hamada S. Distribution and molecular characterization of Porphyromonas gingivalis carrying a new type of fimA gene. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(5):1909–14. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.5.1909-1914.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Amano A, Kubinowa M, Nakagawa I, Akiyama S, Morisaki I, Hamada S. Prevalence of specific genotypes of Porphyromonas gingivalis fimA and periodontal health status. J Dent Res. 2000;79:1664–68. doi: 10.1177/00220345000790090501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Amano A. Molecular interaction of Porphyromonas gingivalis with host cells: implication for the microbial pathogenesis of periodontal disease. J Peridontol. 2003;74(1):90–96. doi: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.1.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Miura M, Hamachi T, Fujise O, Maeda K. The prevalence and pathogenic differences of Porphyromonas gingivalis fimA genotypes in patients with aggressive periodontitis. J Periodontal Res. 2005;40(2):147–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2005.00779.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Enersen M, Olsen I, Kvalheim Ø, Caugant DA. FimA genotypes and multilocus sequence types of Porphyromonas gingivalis from patients with periodontitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(1):31–42. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00986-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Van der Ploeg JR, Giertsen E, Ludin B, Morgeli C, Zinkernagel AS, Gmur R. Quantitative detection of Porphyromonas gingivalis fimA genotypes in dental plaque. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004;232(1):31–37. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(04)00064-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Missailidis CG, Umeda JE, Ota-Tsuzuki C, Anzai D, Mayer MP. Distribution of fimA genotypes of Porphyromonas gingivalis in subjects with various periodontal conditions. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2004;19(4):224–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2004.00140.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Kato T, Kawai S, Nakano K, Inaba H, Kuboniwa M, Nakagawa I, et al. Virulence of Porphyromonas gingivalis is altered by substitution of fimbria gene with different genotype. Cell Microbiol. 2007;9(3):753–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00825.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Zheng C, Wu J, Xie H. Differential expression and adherence of Porphyromonas gingivalis fimA genotypes. Mol Oral Microbiol. 2011;26:388–95. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1014.2011.00626.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Lyons SR, Griffen AL, Leys EJ. Quantitative real-time PCR for Porphyromonas gingivalis and total bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:2362–65. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.6.2362-2365.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Morillo JM, Lau L, Sanz M, Herrera D, Martín C, Silva A. Quantitative real-time PCR based on single copy gene sequence for detection of periodontal pathogens. J Clin Peridontol. 2004;31:1054–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2004.00608.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Boutaga K, Van Winkelhoff AJ, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM J E, Savelkoul PHM. The additional value of real-time PCR in the quantitative detection of periodontal pathogens. J Clin Periodontol. 2006;33:427–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00925.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Löe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. Acta Odontol Scand. 1963;21:533–51. doi: 10.3109/00016356309011240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Hintao J, Teanpaisan R, Chongsuvivatwong V, Ratarasan C, Dahlen G. The microbiological profiles of saliva, supragingival and subgingival plaque and dental caries in adults with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2007;22:175–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2007.00341.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Wu Y, Yan J, Chen L, Gu Z. Association between infection of different strains of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans in subgingival plaque and clinical parameters in chronic periodontitis. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2007;8:121–31. doi: 10.1631/jzus.2007.B0121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Morrison TB, Weis JJ, Wittwer CT. Quantification of low-copy transcripts by continuous SYBR Green I monitoring during amplification. Biotechniques. 1998;24:954–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Hayashi F, Okada M, Oda Y, Kojima T, Kozai K. Prevalence of Porphyromonas gingivalis fimA genotypes in Japanese children. J Oral Sci. 2012;54(1):77–83. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.54.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Fabrizi, Leon R, Blanc V, Herrera D, Sanz M. Variability of the fimA gene in Porphyromonas gingivalis isolated from periodontitis and non-periodontitis patients. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18(1):e100–05. doi: 10.4317/medoral.18042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Beikler T, Peters U, Prajaneh S, Prior K, Ehmke B, Flemmig TF. Prevalence of Porphyromonas gingivalis fimA genotypes in Caucasians. Eur J Oral Sci. 2003;111(5):390–94. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2003.00065.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Puig-Silla M, Dasi-Fernande F, Montiel-Company J, Almerich-Silla J. Prevalence of fimA genotypes of Porphyromonas gingivalis and other periodontal bacteria in a Spanish population with chronic periodontitis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17(6):e1047–53. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Moreno S, Jaramillo A, Parra B, Botero JE, Contreras A. Porphyromonas gingivalis fim-A genotype distribution among Colombians. Colomb Med (Cali) 2015;46(3):122–27. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Hayashi Fumiko, Okada Mitsugi, Oda Yuki, Kojima Taro, Kozai Katsuyuki. Prevalence of Porphyromonas gingivalis fimA genotypes in Japanese children. J Oral Sci. 2012;54(1):77. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.54.77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]