Skip to main content
PMC home page
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Placenta. 2016 Jun 11;44:61–68. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2016.06.004

Dichotomous effects of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) activation on human fetoplacental endothelial cell function

Anna Palatnik 1, Hong Xin 2, Emily J Su 2
PMCID: PMC4964606  NIHMSID: NIHMS796590  PMID: 27452439

Abstract

Introduction

Maternal cigarette smoking is associated with elevated fetoplacental vascular resistance and fetal growth restriction (FGR). While studies have demonstrated varying effects of nicotine on blood flow, the role of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), abundant toxins in cigarette smoke that cross the placenta, has not been elucidated. We hypothesized that exposure of human fetoplacental endothelial cells (ECs) to the PAH benzo[a]yrene (BaP) would result in up-regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 (PTGS2) and preferential production of vasoconstrictive prostanoids via activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) pathway.

Methods

ECs were isolated, cultured, and treated with vehicle or BaP. ECs were subjected to real-time PCR, western blotting, enzyme immunoassays, wound scratch assays, tube formation assays, and RNA interference against AHR. Statistical analyses were performed with Student’s t-test, one-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparisons testing when appropriate, or the Kruskal-Wallis H test.

Results

BaP induced PTGS2 expression (p<0.05) and production of the stable metabolite of prostacyclin (p=0.001) in fetoplacental ECs without affecting thromboxane. These effects were ablated by PTGS2 inhibition (p<0.01) and RNA interference of AHR (p<0.001). Surprisingly, despite the induction of prostacyclin, EC migration (p=0.007) and tube formation (p=0.003) were inhibited by BaP. AHR inhibition, however, rescued tube formation (p=0.008).

Discussion

BaP-mediated AHR activation results in induction of PTGS2 expression and enhanced production of prostacyclin metabolite. Despite an increase in this vasodilatory and pro-angiogenic prostanoid, BaP exposure also impairs EC migration and angiogenesis through AHR. This suggests that PAH may adversely affect the fetoplacental vasculature through its regulation of angiogenesis.

Introduction

Cigarette smoking in pregnancy leads to higher fetoplacental vascular resistance, and this impedance of blood flow contributes to fetal growth restriction (FGR).1–4 However, the exact mechanisms by which tobacco use impairs fetoplacental blood flow remain unknown. Nicotine, often considered a central culprit in adverse effects of smoking, has been found to elicit variable effects on blood flow.5–7 In contrast, exposure to actual cigarette smoke, which contains a few thousand chemicals, impairs fetoplacental blood flow as demonstrated by abnormal umbilical artery Doppler indices.2–4 This suggests that other compounds within cigarettes beyond just nicotine may contribute to altered fetoplacental vascular resistance and FGR associated with smoking during pregnancy.

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are key toxins present within cigarette smoke condensate and have been implicated in vascular dysfunction. Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), a classic PAH, is one of the most toxic.8 BaP crosses the placenta and has been found in both neonatal tissues and umbilical cord blood after maternal cigarette smoking.9–11 In both animal models and human studies, in utero exposure to BaP increases risks for a variety of consequences including reduced vascularization of the fetoplacental tree and FGR.12–14 One major mechanism by which BaP acts is via activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) pathway.15 AHR is a member of the basic helix-loop-helix family of transcription factors and is activated by ligands including BaP. Upon ligand binding to AHR, dimerization of AHR to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT) occurs.16,17 The AHR/ARNT heterodimer then binds to xenobiotic response elements in the promoters of key genes, resulting in gene transcription.18

Proper AHR signaling has several important physiologic consequences. For example, regression of fetal vascular structures does not occur in Ahr null mice.19–21 Specifically, the ductus venosus remains persistently patent in these mice, whereas closure occurrs after Ahr activation in mice that were hypomorphic for the Ahr allele.19–21 These findings, in conjunction with that of deficient fetoplacental vascularization in BaP-exposed mice, implicate Ahr signaling on fetoplacental vascular development and fetal growth.13,14,19–21

The specific mechanisms underlying AHR-mediated regulation of vascular function both within and beyond the placenta have not been fully elucidated. AHR activation has been shown to result in cyclooxygenase-2 (PTGS2) induction in several cell and tissue types.22,23 Furthermore, other studies suggest that proper closure of fetal vascular structures including the ductus venosus are mediated by prostaglandin production downstream of PTGS2.24–26 Thus, the main objective of this study was to determine the effects of AHR activation on PTGS2 expression and prostaglandin biosynthesis within a model of human fetoplacental endothelial cells (ECs). Using BaP as a representative PAH within cigarette smoke and as a ligand of AHR, we hypothesized that BaP-mediated AHR signaling results in preferential production of cyclooxygenase-induced vasoconstrictive prostaglandins, thereby contributing to cigarette smoking-associated aberrant fetoplacental vascular resistance.

Methods

Cell isolation and culture

Human placental villous EC isolation was performed as previously described with minor modifications after approval by the institutional review board at Northwestern University and subject consent.27 Cells were isolated immediately after delivery from placentas from uncomplicated, full-term pregnancies without a personal history of cigarette smoking or tobacco use during pregnancy. None of the subjects were exposed to aspirin or other non-steroidal medications throughout pregnancy. Based on previous data, primary cells were used only through the fifth passage to avoid changes in phenotype.

Cells were cultured with media that was supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum, bovine brain extract with heparin, epidermal growth factor, hydrocortisone, and gentamicin/amphotericin B (Lonza, Walkersville, MD). Once 70% confluence was achieved, cells were treated for 24 hours with vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide [DMSO] 1:1000; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) or BaP (10−8 M, or 10−6 M; Sigma-Aldrich). These concentrations were chosen to correspond to prior data demonstrating BaP concentrations and BaP-DNA adducts in umbilical cord blood of neonates born to smoking mothers.9,11 In experiments where specific PTGS2-inhibition was performed, cells were first pre-treated with vehicle or N-[2-(Cyclohexyloxy)-4-nitrophenyl] methanesulfonamide (NS398) for four hours prior to BaP exposure.

RNA isolation and real-time PCR

Total RNA from primary EC cultures was extracted using Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia,CA). One microgram of RNA was reverse-transcribed using Q-script (Quanta Biosciences; Gaithersburg, MD). Specific oligodeoxynucleotide primers were synthesized according to published information for cDNA of the various genes as previously published, with each primer set spanning two exons, or purchased from Qiagen.28 Primer sets for the constitutively expressed ribosomal protein, large, P0 (RPLP0) housekeeping gene were also used.29 Real-time quantitative PCR was used to determine the relative amounts of each transcript using the DNA-binding dye SYBR green (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), and the ABI Prism 7900 HT Detection System (Applied Biosystems). Cycling conditions and cycle threshold analysis were performed as previously described.27,28,30

Protein isolation and immunoblotting

Placental ECs were lysed, and protein concentrations were determined as previously described.27 Equal concentrations of total protein were loaded in each well. Samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Pall Life Sciences, Port Washington, NY). The following antibodies were used for immunoblotting: polyclonal antibody against PTGS2 (1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), monoclonal antibody against AHR (1:1000; Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX) and monoclonal antibody against beta-actin (ACTB; 1:10,000; Sigma-Aldrich). An antibody directed against Profilerating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA; 1:5000; Cell Signaling) and Caspase-3 antibody (1:2000; Cell Signaling) were utilized to assess effects of BaP on proliferation and apoptosis, respectively. Anti-rabbit and anti-mouse IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Cell Signaling Technology) were used as secondary antibodies. Lastly, immunoreactive bands were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ).

RNA interference

An RNA oligonucleotide directed against AHR and a mismatch negative control small interfering RNA (siRNA) were purchased from Ambion Life technologies (Grand Island, NY). Placental ECs were cultured in media without antibiotics and achieved 50% confluence prior to transfection. On the day of transfection, the RNAiMAX lipofectamine-based reagent (Life technologies) was combined in conjunction with 20 nM siRNA duplexes that were diluted in Opti-Mem I (Life technologies) and applied to the cells. Six hours later, complete growth medium without antibiotics was added, and cells were allowed to recover overnight. The next morning, cells were treated with vehicle or BaP (10−6 M) for 24 hours.

Enzyme immunoassay

Placental ECs were treated with vehicle and BaP in the presence and absence of NS398 pre-treatment or were subjected to RNA interference as described earlier. After 24 hours of treatment, culture medium was removed and cells were suspended in serum- and supplement-starved basal media. Twenty-four hours later, cell culture supernatant was collected, centrifuged to remove any cellular contaminants, and transferred to a fresh tube. Enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) were performed for thromboxane B2 (TXB2; main metabolite of thromboxane A2 [TXA2]) and 6-keto-prostaglandin F1 alpha (6-keto-PGF1α; main metabolite of prostacyclin [PGI2]) as previously described.31 Concentrations were normalized to total protein concentrations.

Tube Formation Assays

Tube formation assays were conducted on growth factor–reduced Matrigel (BD Biosciences), which was added in a volume of 50 μL/well to a 96-well plate and allowed to polymerize at 37°C for 30 minutes. After polymerization, ECs were stained with calcein AM and plated on the Matrigel at 1.5 × 104 cells/well in 200 μL of medium.32 Tube formation was observed under an inverted microscope (Zeiss Axiovert 40 CFL) after 18 hours. Images were captured with a Zeiss AxioCam camera attached to the microscope. The tube formation was quantified by measuring the long axis of the individual cells on Matrigel using ImageJ (NIH public domain). Mean values of total length in each sample were used to represent the tube formation.

Wound scratch assays

Placental ECs were plated in equal number (1.5 × 106 cells per well) in 6-well plates and allowed to grow to confluence. A wound was created in each well by scratching the confluent monolayer with a 200 mL pipette tip. Cells were then washed with PBS once followed by replacement of fresh media with vehicle or treatment as indicated. Cells were imaged immediately after wounding. They were imaged again at 6 hours and 24 hours after wounding. ImageJ software was utilized to determine the percentage of wound closure.

Statistical analysis

All cellular experiments were performed on samples isolated from four separate subjects, with each repeated in triplicate. The data from all experiments were pooled and assessed for normality via the Shapiro-Wilk test. Numeric data are reported as means of the three replicates performed in all subjects, with error bars that represent SEM. Statistical analysis for comparison of treatment groups was performed using Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA followed by Scheffe multiple comparison test when appropriate. For non-parametric data, the Kruskal-Wallis H test was utilized. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

BaP induces PTGS2 expression

Within our model of fetoplacental ECs, physiologically relevant doses of BaP induced PTGS2 mRNA expression in a dose-dependent fashion (overall p<0.0001 for one-way ANOVA; 1.45-fold induction for BaP 10−8 M [95% CI 1.05 – 1.85; p=0.02]; 2.80-fold induction for BaP 10−6 M [95% CI 2.35 – 3.25; p<0.001]). There was no effect of BaP on cyclooxygenase-1 (PTGS1), prostacyclin synthase (PTGIS), or thromboxane synthase (TBXAS1) expression (Figure 1A). Western blot results demonstrated a trend toward induction of PTGS2 protein expression with BaP 10−8 M (2.26 fold-change [95% CI 0.75 – 3.76; p=0.06). BaP 10−6 M, however, led to a statistically significant increase in PTGS2 protein expression (3.09 fold-change [95% CI 1.46 – 4.71; p=0.008]) (Figure 2B, 2C). In order to confirm AHR activation in our model, we also investigated BaP effects on known AHR target genes such as the cytochrome P450 genes CYP1A1 and CYP1B1. We found a significant, dose-dependent induction in both genes (χ2 = 12.9, p=0.012) (Supplemental Figure 1A). Similarly, dioxin, another AHR ligand was also utilized to demonstrate AHR activation. This also led to induction of CYP1A1, CYP1B1, in addition to PTGS2 within our model (χ2 = 13.0, p=0.011) (Supplemental Figure 1B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

BaP induces PTGS2 expression with no significant effect on PTGS1, PTGIS, or TBXAS1. (A) Real-time PCR demonstrates a statistically significant induction of PTGS2 mRNA in a dose-dependent manner (*p=0.02 in comparison to vehicle; ^p<0.001 in comparison to vehicle). (B) A representative western blot from one subject also demonstrates a BaP-mediated increase in PTGS2 protein expression. (C) Densitometric analysis of western blot results from all subjects confirms an induction of PTGS2 protein expression with BaP 10−6 M (#p=0.008 in comparison to vehicle) and a trend toward induction with BaP 10−8 M (p=0.06).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Effects of BaP on PTGS2 are mediated through AHR. (A) There was no effect of BaP on AHR mRNA expression. (B) Similarly, BaP exposure did not influence ARNT mRNA expression. (C) A representative western blot demonstrates complete ablation of AHR expression with transfection of AHR siRNA. (D) Densitometric analysis of PTGS2 western blots from all subjects demonstrates up-regulation of PTGS2 protein expression with BaP treatment in the setting of control siRNA transfection (*p<0.001 in comparison to control siRNA and vehicle). With AHR ablation, however, BaP treatment resulted in significant suppression of PTGS2 expression (^p=0.007 in comparison to control siRNA and BaP treatment).

BaP induction of COX-2 is mediated through AHR

We first investigated whether BaP affected AHR expression itself, and real-time PCR confirmed no effect (Figure 2A). Similarly, exposure did not influence mRNA expression of ARNT, the heterodimeric partner to AHR (Figure 2B). In order to determine whether BaP induction of PTGS2 was indeed occurring via AHR, we performed RNA interference of AHR. After exposure of fetoplacental ECs to the lipid transfection reagent, approximately 85–90% of cells were viable in comparison to cells not exposed to lipid reagent based upon Trypan blue dye exclusion (data not shown). This degree of viability did not change regardless of addition of control siRNA or AHR siRNA.

As expected cells transfected with control siRNA continued to demonstrate statistically significant induction of PTGS2 (overall p<0.0001 for one-way ANOVA; 1.39-fold induction in comparison to vehicle treatment with control siRNA transfection [95% CI 1.31 – 1.46; p<0.001]). With RNA interference of AHR, however, there was complete ablation of AHR expression (Figure 2C) and PTGS2 expression was significantly suppressed (0.63 fold-change in comparison to BaP treatment with control siRNA transfection [95% CI 0.53 – 0.74; p=0.007]) (Figure 2D).

6-keto PGF1α concentrations are increased by BaP treatment

We initially hypothesized that BaP would also up-regulate TBXAS1 in addition to PTGS2, and that this would result in preferential production of the vasoconstrictive prostanoid thromboxane A2 (TXA2). However, because BaP did not affect PTGIS or TBXAS1 expression (Figure 1A), we subsequently speculated that BaP would result in an increase in both TXA2 and the vasodilatory prostanoid prostacyclin (PGI2) secondary to PTS2-mediated increased production of prostaglandin H2 (PGH2) intermediate. To test this hypothesis, we performed EIAs for thromboxane B2 (TXB2), the stable metabolite of TXA2, along with 6-keto PGF1α, the stable metabolite of PGI2. We found that TXB2 levels were repeatedly undetectable in cell culture supernatant regardless of vehicle or varying BaP concentrations (data not shown). In contrast, 6-keto PGF1α levels were significantly increased with BaP treatment (overall p<0.0001 for one-way ANOVA; p=0.001 when comparing BaP 10−6 M treatment to vehicle treatment) (Figure 3A).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

BaP does not affect TXB2 but leads to an induction of 6-keto PGF1α via the AHR/PTGS2 pathway. (A) EIA demonstrates that BaP increases 6-keto PGF1α concentrations in a dose-dependent manner, but this is inhibited in the setting of selective PTGS2 inhibition with NS398 (*p=0.001 in comparison to vehicle; ^p=0.007 in comparison to BaP 10−8 M treatment; #p<0.001 in comparison to BaP 10−6 M treatment). (B) Real-time PCR shows that BaP-mediated induction of PTGS2 mRNA expression is not inhibited with use of NS398, a selective inhibitor of PTGS2 activity (overall p=0.08 for one-way ANOVA). (C) A representative western blot from one subject also shows that PTGS2 protein expression is not inhibited by NS398 pre-treatment. (D) Graphical representation of western blot analyses from all subjects also confirms no effect of NS398 on PTGS2 protein expression (overall p=0.07 for one-way ANOVA). (E) AHR silencing via siRNA results in significant suppression of 6-keto PGF1α concentrations (*p<0.001 in comparison to control siRNA and vehicle; ^p<0.001 in comparison to control siRNA and BaP).

BaP-mediated increases in 6-keto PGF1a are AHR and PTGS2-dependent

In order to determine whether the increase in 6-keto PGF1α concentrations after exposure to BaP was specifically the result of PTGS2 induction, we pre-treated cells with NS398, a selective inhibitor of PTGS2 activity.33 NS398 did not affect PTGS2 mRNA (overall p=0.08 for one-way ANOVA) or protein expression (overall p=0.07 for one-way ANOVA) (Figure 3B, 3C, 3D). However, 6-keto PGF1α concentrations were significantly suppressed after NS398 pre-treatment (overall p<0.0001 for one-way ANOVA; p<0.01 for both BaP concentrations before and after NS398 pre-treatment) (Figure 3A). Similarly, RNA interference of AHR resulted in significant inhibition of 6-keto PGF1a concentrations when compared to BaP-treated cells transfected with control siRNA (overall p<0.0001 for one-way ANOVA; p<0.001 when comparing BaP treatment in control siRNA versus AHR siRNA conditions) (Figure 3E).

Fetoplacental EC tube formation is inhibited in the setting of BaP exposure

Our findings of AHR-mediated induction of PTGS2 expression and production of 6-keto PGF1α, a known vasodilator, not only contradicted our hypothesis that BaP treatment would result in preferential production of vasoconstrictive prostanoids but also did not correspond with existing literature demonstrating elevated fetoplacental vascular resistance in mice exposed to PAHs. The placentas of these mice, however, were thought to demonstrate increased vascular resistance secondary to an increase in fetoplacental vessel tortuosity and to decreased numbers of placental arteries and arteriole.13,14 Thus, we examined whether BaP would negatively affect development of the placental vasculature using EC tube formation angiogenesis assays. In the setting of BaP treatment, tube formation appeared disrupted in comparison to vehicle-treated cells, with a decrease in total tube length noted (p=0.003) (Figure 4A, 4B). This finding of disrupted tube formation persisted in cells that were subjected to control siRNA transfection (overall p<0.0001 for one-way ANOVA; p=0.01 for this post-hoc comparison) (Figure 4C, 4D). In contrast, AHR ablation rescued total tube length even in the setting of BaP exposure (p=0.008 for this post-hoc comparison) (Figure 4C, 4D), suggesting that BaP activation of AHR contributes to impaired angiogenesis.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

BaP exposure results in impaired EC tube formation. (A) Representative tube formation images of vehicle- and BaP-treated endothelial cells. (B) Graphical representation demonstrates that total tube length is diminished in the setting of BaP treatment (*p=0.003). (C) Representative tube formation images in the setting of control siRNA and AhR siRNA transfections demonstrate that BaP-mediated effects on tube formation is mediated via AhR. (D) Graphical representation of total tube length shows that BaP treatment results in impaired angiogenesis in comparison to vehicle treatment in the setting of control siRNA transfection (^p=0.01). In contrast, when AHR is knocked down, tube formation is rescued in the presence of BaP (#p=0.008).

Deficient EC tube formation is the result of impaired EC migration

To determine the mechanistic cellular defect underlying impaired EC tube formation, we evaluated the effects of BaP on various factors, including EC proliferation, apoptosis, and migration. Western blot for PCNA and caspase-3, which were probed on two separate membranes, demonstrated no differences in proliferation or apoptosis, respectively (Figure 5A). In contrast, wound scratch assays demonstrated a deficiency in EC migration at 6 hours and 24 hours (χ2 = 15.9, p=0.007) (Figures 5B, 5C).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Deficient EC tube formation is the result of impaired EC migration. (A) Representative western blots shows no difference in proliferation or apoptosis with varying concentrations of BaP treatment in all four subjects. (B) Representative wound scratch images from one subject demonstrate impaired migration after BaP treatment. (C) Graphical representation of wound scratch assays performed on all subjects (χ2 = 15.9, p=0.007).

Discussion

In this study, we found that exposure of human fetoplacental ECs to physiologically relevant doses of BaP, an abundant PAH in cigarette smoke, led to induction of PTGS2 without affecting PTGS1, PTGIS, or TBXAS1 expression. We anticipated that induction of PTGS2 would increase PGH2 substrate availability for uptake and conversion to vascular prostanoids by these prostanoid synthases. However, despite expression of TBXAS1, TXB2 levels were consistently undetectable. Instead, we found a preferential increase in 6-keto PGF1α levels in the setting of BaP treatment while also finding that BaP inhibited EC tube formation via impairment of EC migration.

One potential explanation for our unexpected findings is that PTGS2 preferentially couples with PTGIS within cultured ECs to result in enhanced 6-keto PGF1α production.34,35 It is also possible that other vasoactive mediators are involved. However, upon investigating other potential key players, BaP treatment did not alter expression levels of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS3) or endothelin-1 (EDN1) (data not shown). Still another possibility is that within our single-cell culture system, we are missing potentially important paracrine interactions. For instance, transcellular production of prostanoids and eicosanoids from PGH2 has been described.36,37 Similarly, trophoblast also express AHR, and crosstalk between EC- and trophoblast-derived proteins such as PTGS2 or other metabolizing enzymes may occur.38,39 Finally, this increase in vasodilatory prostanoid may represent a compensatory mechanism in the setting of impaired angiogenesis. This possibility is supported by data from others that fetoplacental vessels appeared enlarged in PAH-exposed dams despite reduction in placental arterial vascular volume.13

Beyond its vasodilatory capacity, PGI2 enhances angiogenesis through its promotion of EC migration40,41 Within our fetoplacental EC model, however, BaP-mediated AHR activation both up-regulates 6-keto PGF 1α while impairing EC migration and tube formation. This suggests that this disruption in angiogenesis is occurring through non-PGI2-mediated mechanisms and that the increase in PGI2 concentrations is inadequate to rescue the deficiency in angiogenesis. Instead, it is possible that BaP may act via AHR to affect other aspects of angiogenesis. For example, BaP exposure inhibits expression of key subunits of integrin, which are required for vessel stabilization through EC-EC interaction and EC interaction/stabilization with the extracellular microenvironment.42,43

Although this is the first study to our knowledge that aims to identify the mechanistic underpinnings of BaP-mediated AHR activation in human fetoplacental ECs, there are limitations to our study. First, we examined only one of the few thousand chemicals found in cigarette smoke, and it is possible that other toxins may act upon the fetoplacental endothelium differently. Second, in order to isolate the effects of AHR activation, our ECs were obtained from uncomplicated, full-term pregnancies and not from women who smoked and had a growth-restricted fetus. Finally, although we chose physiologically relevant doses of BaP based upon known BaP concentrations and BaP-DNA adducts in umbilical cord blood of neonates born to smoking mothers, we only examined a discrete 24-hour treatment period and were unable to ascertain the effects of chronic BaP exposure.

In summary, we have shown that BaP acts via AHR to induce PTGS2 expression and production of 6-keto PGF1α. Despite an increase in production of this vasodilatory and pro-angiogenic prostanoid, we also found that BaP impairs EC migration and angiogenesis, which is consistent with murine data that maternal exposure to BaP results in deficient fetoplacental vascularization. These findings are important because despite irrefutable evidence that cigarette smoking during pregnancy remains the leading preventable cause of FGR in developed countries, clinical data are clear that neither smoking cessation counseling nor nicotine replacement therapy during pregnancy significantly reduces smoking or promotes abstinence.44,45 Thus, elucidating the mechanisms by which maternal smoking results in placental dysfunction and FGR may yield alternative methods of improving perinatal outcome despite in utero exposure to cigarette smoke and its related toxins.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Figure 1

AHR is activated in this fetoplacental EC model. (A) Real-time PCR demonstrates significant dose-dependent induction of CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 with BaP treatment, confirming AHR activation with BaP in this fetoplacental EC model (χ2 = 12.9, p=0.012). (B) Using dioxin as another representative AHR ligand, real-timePCR shows that dioxin induces both CYP1A1 and PTGS2 in a time-dependent fashion (χ2 = 13.0, p=0.011).

Highlights.

  • Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) induces cyclooxygenase-2 and increases 6-keto PGF1α

  • Fetoplacental endothelial cell migration and tube formation are inhibited by BaP

  • BaP effects on fetoplacental endothelial cells occur via aryl hydrocarbon receptor

  • Angiogenic impairment mediates adverse effects of BaP on fetoplacental vasculature

Acknowledgments

Funding: NIH HL119846

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Disclosures: The authors report no conflict of interest.

Presented in the oral format at the 62nd annual meeting of the Society for Reproductive Investigation, San Francisco, CA, March 25–28, 2015.

References

  • 1.Benirschke KBG, Baergen RN. Pahology of the Human Placenta. 6th. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Morrow RJ, Ritchie JW, Bull SB. Maternal cigarette smoking: the effects on umbilical and uterine blood flow velocity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;159(5):1069–1071. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90415-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lambers DS, Clark KE. The maternal and fetal physiologic effects of nicotine. Semin Perinatol. 1996;20(2):115–126. doi: 10.1016/s0146-0005(96)80079-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bruner JP, Forouzan I. Smoking and buccally administered nicotine. Acute effect on uterine and umbilical artery Doppler flow velocity waveforms. J Reprod Med. 1991;36(6):435–440. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Heeschen C, Jang JJ, Weis M, et al. Nicotine stimulates angiogenesis and promotes tumor growth and atherosclerosis. Nat Med. 2001;7(7):833–839. doi: 10.1038/89961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lo JO, Schabel MC, Roberts VH, et al. Vitamin C supplementation ameliorates the adverse effects of nicotine on placental hemodynamics and histology in nonhuman primates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(3):370, e371–e378. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.12.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Romani F, Lanzone A, Tropea A, Tiberi F, Catino S, Apa R. Nicotine and cotinine affect the release of vasoactive factors by trophoblast cells and human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Placenta. 2011;32(2):153–160. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2010.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fowles J, Bates M. The chemical constitutent in cigarettes and cigarette smoke: Priorities for harm reduction. A Report to the New Zealand Ministry of Health. 2000 [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Arnould JP, Verhoest P, Bach V, Libert JP, Belegaud J. Detection of benzo[a]pyrene-DNA adducts in human placenta and umbilical cord blood. Hum Exp Toxicol. 1997;16(12):716–721. doi: 10.1177/096032719701601204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Karttunen V, Myllynen P, Prochazka G, Pelkonen O, Segerback D, Vahakangas K. Placental transfer and DNA binding of benzo(a)pyrene in human placental perfusion. Toxicol Lett. 2010;197(2):75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.04.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Machado Jde B, Chatkin JM, Zimmer AR, Goulart AP, Thiesen FV. Cotinine and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons levels in the amniotic fluid and fetal cord at birth and in the urine from pregnant smokers. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e116293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Choi H, Rauh V, Garfinkel R, Tu Y, Perera FP. Prenatal exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and risk of intrauterine growth restriction. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(5):658–665. doi: 10.1289/ehp.10958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Detmar J, Rennie MY, Whiteley KJ, et al. Fetal growth restriction triggered by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons is associated with altered placental vasculature and AhR-dependent changes in cell death. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2008;295(2):E519–E530. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.90436.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rennie MY, Detmar J, Whiteley KJ, et al. Vessel tortuousity and reduced vascularization in the fetoplacental arterial tree after maternal exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011;300(2):H675–H684. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00510.2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shimizu Y, Nakatsuru Y, Ichinose M, et al. Benzo[a]pyrene carcinogenicity is lost in mice lacking the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(2):779–782. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.2.779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hoffman EC, Reyes H, Chu FF, et al. Cloning of a factor required for activity of the Ah (dioxin) receptor. Science. 1991;252(5008):954–958. doi: 10.1126/science.1852076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Reyes H, Reisz-Porszasz S, Hankinson O. Identification of the Ah receptor nuclear translocator protein (Arnt) as a component of the DNA binding form of the Ah receptor. Science. 1992;256(5060):1193–1195. doi: 10.1126/science.256.5060.1193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dolwick KM, Swanson HI, Bradfield CA. In vitro analysis of Ah receptor domains involved in ligand-activated DNA recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90(18):8566–8570. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.18.8566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lahvis GP, Lindell SL, Thomas RS, et al. Portosystemic shunting and persistent fetal vascular structures in aryl hydrocarbon receptor-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(19):10442–10447. doi: 10.1073/pnas.190256997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lahvis GP, Pyzalski RW, Glover E, Pitot HC, McElwee MK, Bradfield CA. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor is required for developmental closure of the ductus venosus in the neonatal mouse. Mol Pharmacol. 2005;67(3):714–720. doi: 10.1124/mol.104.008888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Walisser JA, Bunger MK, Glover E, Bradfield CA. Gestational exposure of Ahr and Arnt hypomorphs to dioxin rescues vascular development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(47):16677–16682. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404379101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Martey CA, Baglole CJ, Gasiewicz TA, Sime PJ, Phipps RP. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor is a regulator of cigarette smoke induction of the cyclooxygenase and prostaglandin pathways in human lung fibroblasts. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2005;289(3):L391–L399. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00062.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vondracek J, Umannova L, Machala M. Interactions of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor with inflammatory mediators: beyond CYP1A regulation. Curr Drug Metab. 2011;12(2):89–103. doi: 10.2174/138920011795016827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Adeagbo AS, Bishai I, Lees J, Olley PM, Coceani F. Evidence for a role of prostaglandin I2 and thromboxane A2 in the ductus venosus of the lamb. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1985;63(9):1101–1105. doi: 10.1139/y85-181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fugelseth D, Lindemann R, Liestol K, Kiserud T, Langslet A. Postnatal closure of ductus venosus in preterm infants < or = 32 weeks. An ultrasonographic study. Early Hum Dev. 1998;53(2):163–169. doi: 10.1016/s0378-3782(98)00051-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nukaya M, Moran S, Bradfield CA. The role of the dioxin-responsive element cluster between the Cyp1a1 and Cyp1a2 loci in aryl hydrocarbon receptor biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(12):4923–4928. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809613106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Su EJ, Cheng YH, Chatterton RT, et al. Regulation of 17-beta hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 in human placental endothelial cells. Biol Reprod. 2007;77(3):517–525. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.106.059451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Su EJ, Ernst L, Abdallah N, et al. Estrogen receptor-beta and fetoplacental endothelial prostanoid biosynthesis: a link to clinically demonstrated fetal growth restriction. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2011;96(10):E1558–E1567. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-1084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Frasor J, Stossi F, Danes JM, Komm B, Lyttle CR, Katzenellenbogen BS. Selective estrogen receptor modulators: discrimination of agonistic versus antagonistic activities by gene expression profiling in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2004;64(4):1522–1533. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-3326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Su EJ, Lin ZH, Zeine R, et al. Estrogen receptor-beta mediates cyclooxygenase-2 expression and vascular prostanoid levels in human placental villous endothelial cells. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(4):427, e421–e428. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Arnaoutova I, Kleinman HK. In vitro angiogenesis: endothelial cell tube formation on gelled basement membrane extract. Nat Protoc. 2010;5(4):628–635. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2010.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Futaki N, Takahashi S, Yokoyama M, Arai I, Higuchi S, Otomo S. NS-398, a new anti-inflammatory agent, selectively inhibits prostaglandin G/H synthase/cyclooxygenase (COX-2) activity in vitro. Prostaglandins. 1994;47(1):55–59. doi: 10.1016/0090-6980(94)90074-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ruan KH, Deng H, Wu J, So SP. The N-terminal membrane anchor domain of the membrane-bound prostacyclin synthase involved in the substrate presentation of the coupling reaction with cyclooxygenase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2005;435(2):372–381. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2004.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ueno N, Murakami M, Tanioka T, et al. Coupling between cyclooxygenase, terminal prostanoid synthase, and phospholipase A2. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(37):34918–34927. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M100429200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sala A, Folco G, Murphy RC. Transcellular biosynthesis of eicosanoids. Pharmacol Rep. 2010;62(3):503–510. doi: 10.1016/s1734-1140(10)70306-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Salvado MD, Alfranca A, Escolano A, Haeggstrom JZ, Redondo JM. COX-2 limits prostanoid production in activated HUVECs and is a source of PGH2 for transcellular metabolism to PGE2 by tumor cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29(7):1131–1137. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.188540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hao K, Zhou Q, Chen W, et al. Possible role of the 'IDO-AhR axis' in maternal-foetal tolerance. Cell Biol Int. 2013;37(2):105–108. doi: 10.1002/cbin.10023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Li Y, Wang K, Zou QY, Zhou C, Magness RR, Zheng J. A possible role of aryl hydrocarbon receptor in spontaneous preterm birth. Med Hypotheses. 2015;84(5):494–497. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2015.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hoang KG, Allison S, Murray M, Petrovic N. Prostanoids regulate angiogenesis acting primarily on IP and EP4 receptors. Microvasc Res. 2015;101:127–134. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2015.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Muramatsu R, Takahashi C, Miyake S, Fujimura H, Mochizuki H, Yamashita T. Angiogenesis induced by CNS inflammation promotes neuronal remodeling through vessel-derived prostacyclin. Nat Med. 2012;18(11):1658–1664. doi: 10.1038/nm.2943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Avraamides CJ, Garmy-Susini B, Varner JA. Integrins in angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8(8):604–617. doi: 10.1038/nrc2353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Li CH, Cheng YW, Hsu YT, Hsu YJ, Liao PL, Kang JJ. Benzo[a]pyrene inhibits angiogenic factors-induced alphavbeta3 integrin expression, neovasculogenesis, and angiogenesis in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Toxicol Sci. 2010;118(2):544–553. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Coleman T, Chamberlain C, Cooper S, Leonardi-Bee J. Efficacy and safety of nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation in pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2011;106(1):52–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03179.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Filion KB, Abenhaim HA, Mottillo S, et al. The effect of smoking cessation counselling in pregnant women: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BJOG. 2011;118(12):1422–1428. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03065.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Figure 1

AHR is activated in this fetoplacental EC model. (A) Real-time PCR demonstrates significant dose-dependent induction of CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 with BaP treatment, confirming AHR activation with BaP in this fetoplacental EC model (χ2 = 12.9, p=0.012). (B) Using dioxin as another representative AHR ligand, real-timePCR shows that dioxin induces both CYP1A1 and PTGS2 in a time-dependent fashion (χ2 = 13.0, p=0.011).

NIHMS796590-supplement.pdf (752.7KB, pdf)

RESOURCES