Skip to main content
NCBI home page
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2016 Jul 28;11(7):e0160104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160104

Changes in the Lodging-Related Traits along with Rice Genetic Improvement in China

Guanglong Zhu 1, Guohui Li 1, Depeng Wang 1, Shen Yuan 1, Fei Wang 1,*
Editor: Jinfa Zhang2
PMCID: PMC4965039  PMID: 27466812

Abstract

Rice yield potential was greatly improved since the green revolution, but the occurrence of lodging often restricts the achievement of potential yield. Currently, it is still obscure about how the lodging-related traits change along with the genetic improvement in yield potential of rice, although much efforts have been devoted to study the trend of and physiological mechanisms underlying changes in grain yield. Therefore, fourteen rice mega-varieties that were released and disseminated from 1930s to 2005 in China were investigated through a two-year experiment in the field condition. The results showed that large genotypic differences in lodging-related morphological traits were observed among these varieties. Lodging index (LI) of semi-dwarf varieties was significantly lower compared with that of SLX(Shenglixian). There were significant differences in LI among the semi-dwarf varieties, but no relationship between LI and the release year was found. Bending moment (BM) of semi-dwarf varieties released in 1940s-1980s was significantly lower than that of SLX. However, varieties released after 1980s had similar bending moment with SLX, but significantly higher breaking resistance (BR). The increase in both BM and BR after 1980s was related with the increase in internode diameter (ND) and stem fresh weight. Overall, this study disclosed the changing pattern of lodging-related traits in the genetic improvement of rice, and suggested that further increase in ND, internode dry weight (NDW) and dry weight per unit length (DWUL) of lower internode in modern super rice variety could effectively enhance lodging resistance and bring down LI.

Introduction

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a major staple food for more than half of world's population [1]. Yield potential of rice was greatly improved since the green revolution due to the development of semi-dwarf varieties in the late 1950s, three-line hybrids in the late 1970s, and super-hybrid rice since 1996 [2–3]. The "three-line system" for hybrid rice production includes cytoplasmic male-sterile line, maintainer line and restorer line [2]. The success of super-hybrid rice was due to a combination of superior agronomic characteristics of IRRI’s New Plant Type and inter-subspecific heterosis [4], which led to a 12% advantage in yield potential compared with ordinary hybrids and inbred varieties [5]. The higher grain yields of super-hybrid rice are attributed to improvement in both source and sink capacity [6], and improvement in crop management [4].

Lodging is one of the factors causing grain yield reduction for most cereal crops, and could reduce grain yield by up to 50%, especially for rice in high-yielding environments [7]. Occurrence of lodging is common after strong wind accompanied by heavy rains during the grain filling period. Recently, over-luxuriant growth due to excessive nitrogen application, high planting density, and global warming have led to increased lodging occurrence [8]. In a lodged plant community, the normal canopy structure is destroyed, leading to reduced photosynthetic ability and dry matter production [9]. Severe lodging prevents the transport of water, nutrients, and assimilates through the xylem and phloem, resulting in a reduction in assimilates for grain filling [10]. Furthermore, high moisture levels in a lodged plant community may be favorable for fungal growth and the occurrence of diseases, which have detrimental effects on grain quality [11]. In situ germination may occur in lodged plants due to conducive environment especially for cultivars with weak seed dormancy. As a result, lodging could cause great losses in both grain yield and quality. In addition, it also causes difficulties in harvest operations, increases demand for grain drying, and consequently results in increased production cost [12].

During the green revolution, dwarfing genes were introduced into wheat and rice varieties to reduce height in order to improve lodging resistance and yield potential of cereal crops [13–14]. Recent studies, however, suggest that reduced plant height of semi-dwarf rice and wheat may limit canopy photosynthesis and biomass production, and therefore, resulted in grain yield stagnation [15–16]. Miralles and Slafer (1995) showed that dwarf wheat may reduce radiation use efficiency in high radiation condition due to more prostrate leaves[17]. Under dry conditions shorter plants may accumulate fewer water soluble carbohydrates in the stem which may reduce the crop’s buffering capacity against poor grain filling conditions. Finally dwarf plants may be more susceptible to certain diseases and weeds because the spread of splash-borne foliar disease is more rapid in short plants [18] and shorter plants have a weak capacity to control weeds [19]. Therefore, there is a contradictory relationship between grain yield potential and lodging resistance [20], and it has been shown that a reduction of approximately 6 cm in plant height could offset an increase of 1 t ha-1 in grain yield potential [21]. If height decreases have not kept pace with yield increases then the increase in yield potential of new varieties is likely to result in a greater lodging risk, unless the strength of the stem base and anchorage system is increased or crop height is reduced further by the use of breeding or use of chemical plant growth regulators [22].

In this study, 14 rice mega varieties (including 5 super high yield varieties) disseminated in China during the last 70 years were grown in the paddy field, and changes in lodging resistance and lodging-related morphological traits and their relationships with grain yield during genetic improvement were investigated. The objectives of this study were to: (1) determine the changes in stem lodging resistance and lodging-related morphological traits of mid-season rice during the last 70 years, (2) examine the relationships between the lodging-related traits of stem and grain yield, (3) identify the key morphological traits associated with lodging resistance.

Materials and Methods

Field experiment

Field experiments were conducted in farmers’ fields at Zhougan village (29°51_N, 115°53_E), Hubei Province, in the Middle Reaches of Yangtze River of China, during the middle rice growing season from May to October in 2013 and 2014 (The farmers’ fields at Zhougan village (29°51_N, 115°53_E), Hubei Province, are used as a experiment station for our college, which is permitted by local government. I confirm that our field studies did not involve any endangered or protected species). The soil of the experiment field had the texture of clay loam with pH 5.47, organic matter 29.10 g kg−1, total N 2.2 g kg−1, available P 12.14 mg kg−1 and available K 92.2 mg kg−1. Fourteen mega rice varieties that were released from 1936 to 2005 were used in this study, and they were planted in a large-scale area during the last 70 years in China. Among them, the seeds of Shenglixian (SLX), Aizizhan (AZZ), Guangchang’ai (GCA), Zhenzhu’ai (ZZA), Ezhong2 (EZ2), Guichao2 (GC2) were provided by China National Rice Research Institute in Zhejiang Province, China. Shanyou63 (SY63), Teqing (TQ) and IIyou725 (IIY725) were obtained from Daijin Agricultural Technology Center (Wuxue, Hubei, China). The seeds of Liangyoupeijiu (LYPJ), Yangliangyou6 (YLY6), Huanghuazhan (HHZ) and Yliangyou1(YLY1) were sourced from Hubei Provincial Seed Group Company. The information of these varieties was shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Information of rice varieties released in different ages since 1930s in China.

Variety Abbreviation Year of release Type
Shenglixian SLX 1936 inbred
Aizizhan AZZ 1948 inbred
Guangchang’ai GCA 1959 inbred
Zhenzhu’ai ZZA 1962 inbred
Nanjing11 NJ11 1967 inbred
Ezhong2 EZ2 1969 inbred
Guichao2 GC2 1973 inbred
Shanyou63 SY63 1981 hybrid
Teqing TQ 1984 inbred
IIyou725 ⅡY725 1995 superhybrid
Liangyoupeijiu LYPJ 1999 superhybrid
Yangliangyou6 YLY6 2001 superhybrid
Huanghuazhan HHZ 2005 inbred
Yliangyou1 YLY1 2005 superhybrid
Open in a new tab

The information was from the website of China Rice Data Center (http://www.ricedata.cn/variety/varis/600877.htm).

The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Totally there were 56 plots and the plot size was 30 m-2 (5 m×6 m). Pre-germinated seeds were sown in seedbed. Twenty-five-day old seedlings were transplanted on 9 June in 2013 and 6 June in 2014. The planting density was 25 hills m-2 at a hill spacing of 30 cm×13.3 cm with three seedlings per hill. Fertilizers (urea for N, single superphosphate for P and potassium chloride for K) were applied at the rates of 150 kg N ha-1, 40 kg P ha-1 and 100 kg K ha-1. N fertilize was split-applied at the ratio of 4:2:4 at basal (1 day before transplanting), tillering (7 days after transplanting), and panicle initiation stage. P and K were all applied at basal. The experimental field was kept flooding from transplanting until 7 days before maturity. Pests and weeds were controlled using chemicals to avoid yield losses.

Measurements

Lodging severity at maturity was scored visually on a scale of 0–9 where 0 was totally upright and 9 was totally lodged. Culm characters related to lodging were determined at 15 days after heading stage for each variety. Five representative hills were sampled from each plot and the 10 largest tillers (2 from each hill) were used to measure lodging-related traits. Stem length from the base of N3 internode (the third internode from top) to the tip of the panicle (SL), and the length of N3 internode (NL) were measured. The plant was cut at the lower node of N3 internode, and the breaking resistance of the middle point of N3 with leaf sheath was measured using a Prostrate Tester (DIK 7400, Japan). The distance between fulcra of the tester was set at 5 cm. The center of the internode, where breaking resistance was measured, was aligned horizontally with the middle point between the two fulcra. After measuring the breaking resistances of N3, fresh weights of the upper portion of the plant from the base of N3 internode including leaf and panicle (FW) were measured. Bending moment (BM) was calculated using the following formula, BM = SL×FW (In physics, the calculating formula for moment (M) is (Fig 1A): M = Force×Arm of force. Rice lodging can be simplified as the following model (Fig 1B), there is a hypothesis that fresh weight is all the weight on the top of the spikelets. Similarly, the calculating formula for bending moment (BM) is calculated as: BM = Plant height×Fresh weight).

Fig 1. The schematic of bending moment (BM) was calculated using the following formula, BM = SL (stem length)×FW (fresh weight).

Fig 1

Open in a new tab

Then, lodging index (bending moment/breaking resistance×100) was calculated for N3 internode according to Amano et al. (1993) [23]. The diameter of N3 near the lower node was measured after removing the leaf sheath. The dry weight of N3 with leaf sheath was measured after oven drying at 80°C to constant weight. Dry weight of N3 with leaf sheath per unit internode length (g cm−1) was also calculated [14, 24].

Statistical analysis

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using Statistix 9 (Analytical Software, FL, USA) and means of cultivars were compared based on the least significant difference (LSD) at the 0.05 probability level. Relationships among lodging-related traits and their relationships with year of release and gain yield were evaluated using correlation analyses (Statistix, 2009). The figure was generated by SigmaPlot 10.0 (SPSS Inc., Point Richmond, CA, USA).

Results

Significant genotypic variation was observed in stem length (SL) in both years (Table 2). SL of SLX were 132.5 and 141.4 cm in 2013 and 2014, respectively, which were significantly higher than that of the other varieties. In general, there was a decreasing trend in SL for the varieties before 1980, but an increasing trend, although not statistically significant, for the varieties after 1980s (Fig 2A and 2B). Similar trend was observed for the N3 internode length (NL) in the process of genetic improvement (Fig 2C and 2D), except that NL of the varieties released after 1980s (except for HHZ) had similar values with SLX (Table 2). There was a significant increasing trend (p<0.05) in N3 internode diameter (ND) and stem fresh weight (FW) along with the release year of the varieties in both 2013 and 2014 (Table 2; Fig 2E, 2F, 2G and 2H). ND and FW of the varieties released after 1980s tended to be higher than that of the older varieties (Table 2). No significant differences (p>0.05) were observed in N3 internode dry weight (NDW) among these varieties in both 2013 and 2014 (Table 2; Fig 2I and 2J).

Table 2. Stem length (SL), N3 internode length (NL), N3 internode diameter (ND), Stem fresh weight (FW) and N3 internode dry weight (DW) of rice varieties grown in 2013 and 2014 released in different ages since 1930s in China.

Variety SL (cm) NL (cm) ND (mm) FW (g) NDW (g)
2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014
SLX 132.5 141.4 20.1 18.1 6.1 6.5 16.2 17.4 4.0 4.1
AZZ 90.1 101.7 13.2 10.2 5.6 6.6 11.8 15.5 3.2 3.3
GCA 91.0 96.4 10.8 9.1 5.7 5.6 13.3 15.9 3.0 3.4
ZZA 99.4 101.9 12.0 9.5 5.7 6.3 14.2 14.9 2.8 3.0
NJ11 88.9 89.1 8.4 6.8 6.1 6.1 12.8 15.9 3.4 3.6
EZ2 95.4 106.0 10.2 8.4 7.1 7.0 12.6 17.0 3.8 4.0
GC2 90.5 103.6 10.4 7.9 6.5 6.7 14.8 17.8 2.9 3.4
SY63 110.2 116.8 16.5 17.3 7.7 7.8 16.3 22.7 3.4 4.3
TQ 110.1 111.3 16.1 18.1 7.4 7.5 16.6 18.0 3.9 3.9
ⅡY725 114.4 113.0 16.8 17.1 7.3 7.6 19.1 20.9 4.3 4.6
LYPJ 109.7 114.4 16.3 15.9 8.0 8.1 18.5 20.8 4.3 4.2
YLY6 113.1 114.4 19.0 17.7 7.5 8.0 18.0 20.0 3.6 3.7
HHZ 91.6 101.6 9.9 7.7 7.5 7.2 14.4 17.0 3.6 4.1
YLY1 111.3 107.7 19.5 19.1 7.1 7.4 17.9 19.8 3.9 3.9
LSD (0.05) 3.56 7.67 2.15 2.46 1.0 0.7 1.64 2.90 1.1 1.3
Open in a new tab

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Open in a new tab

Changes in SL (A, B), NL (C, D), ND (EF, f), FW (G, H) and NDW (I, J) with the year of release of the varieties grown in 2013 and 2014. SL: stem length from the base of N3 internode to the tip of the panicle, NL: N3 internode length, ND: N3 internode diameter, FW: stem fresh weight, NDW: N3 internode dry weight.

Significant variation in N3 internode dry weight per unit length (DWUL) was observed among these varieties in both 2013 and 2014, however, the variation in DWUL was not significantly correlated with the year of release of these varieties (Table 3 and Fig 3A and 3B). DWUL of these varieties ranged from 0.18 to 0.38 g cm-1 in 2013 and 0.23 to 0.53 g cm-1 in 2014 (Table 3). Breaking resistance (BR) was significantly increased (p<0.05) along with the year of release in both 2013 and 2014 (Fig 3C and 3D). In both 2013 and 2014, SLX had the lowest BR of 536 and 668 g cm, respectively (Table 3). A decreasing trend for bending moment (BM) for varieties released from 1930s to 1970s were observed, and then BM was increased to similar value with SLX (Fig 3E and 3F). The values of BM ranged from 1067 to 2188 g cm in 2013 and 1418 to 2450 g cm in 2014 (Table 3). Significant variation in lodging index (LI) was observed among these varieties (p<0.05), and SLX had the highest values of 408 in 2013 and 369 in 2014 (Table 3). Variation in LI for the other varieties except for SLX was also statistically significant (p<0.05), but no relationship with the year of release of the varieties was observed (Fig 3G and 3H). Based on the visual score of lodging (VSL), SLX was severe lodging, and GC2, SY63 and YLY1 had occurred of lodging with medium extent in both years. For AZZ, GCA, ZZA, TQ and YLY6, lodging occurred in one of the two years (Table 3).

Table 3. Dry weight per unit length of N3 internode (DWUL), Bending Moment (BR), Breaking Resistance (BR), Lodging Index (LI) and Visual Score of Lodging (VSL) of rice varieties grown in 2013 and 2014 released in different ages since 1930s in China.

Variety DWUL (g cm-1) BM (g cm) BR (g cm) LI VSL
2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014 2013 2014
SLX 0.20 0.23 2140 2450 536 668 408 369 8 8
AZZ 0.23 0.33 1067 1575 601 779 179 208 0 7
GCA 0.28 0.38 1213 1542 663 780 184 198 3 0
ZZA 0.25 0.35 1413 1519 975 918 148 166 0 4
NJ11 0.38 0.53 1135 1418 735 850 156 167 0 0
EZ2 0.35 0.50 1209 1799 752 886 161 204 0 0
GC2 0.28 0.45 1333 1842 847 897 159 207 3 7
SY63 0.23 0.25 1795 2664 934 1096 193 246 5 5
TQ 0.25 0.23 1827 2006 908 1041 204 192 3 0
ⅡY725 0.25 0.28 2188 2384 894 1100 249 214 0 0
LYPJ 0.28 0.28 2033 2374 1020 967 200 248 0 0
YLY6 0.18 0.23 2045 2296 786 812 261 283 0 3
HHZ 0.35 0.53 1317 1739 1012 1042 131 166 0 0
YLY1 0.20 0.23 1990 2137 972 1169 205 183 4 5
LSD (0.05) 0.10 0.15 207 378 125 163 44 39 - -
Open in a new tab

Lodging score: 0–9, resistant to susceptible.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Open in a new tab

Changes in DWUL (A, B), BM (C, D), BR (E, F) and LI (G, H) with the year of release of the rice varieties grown in 2013 and 2014. DWUL: N3 internode dry weight per unit length, BM: bending moment, BR: breaking resistance, LI: lodging index.

Correlation among the parameters related with lodging was shown in Table 4. LI was significantly correlated with SL, NL, FW and BM positively, but with DWUL and BR negatively in both 2013 and 2014 (Table 4). ND and FW both significantly correlated with BR in 2013 and 2014, while NDW and BM significantly correlated with BR only in 2014 (Table 4). Significantly positive correlation (p<0.05) was observed between BM and SL, NL, ND, FW and NDW in both 2013 and 2014, while negative correlation was observed between BM and DMUL in both 2013 and 2014 (Table 4).

Table 4. Correlation coefficient (r) among lodging-related traits of rice varieties grown in 2013 and 2014 in different ages since 1930s in China.

Parameters SL NL ND FW NDW DWUL BM BR
2013
NL 0.85**
ND 0.29* 0.29*
FW 0.70** 0.68** 0.46**
NDW 0.41** 0.29* 0.34* 0.33*
DWUL -0.43** -0.66** 0.05 ns -0.33* 0.44*
BM 0.89** 0.82** 0.41** 0.95** 0.38** -0.41**
BR -0.04 ns 0.01 ns 0.44* 0.41** 0.09ns 0.11ns 0.22ns
LI 0.84** 0.65** 0.02 ns 0.45* 0.30** -0.37** 0.67** -0.51**
2014
NL 0.64**
ND 0.37** 0.52**
FW 0.40** 0.58** 0.63**
NDW 0.26* 0.26* 0.36** 0.50**
DWUL -0.46** -0.79** -0.26 * -0.31* 0.26*
BM 0.76** 0.71** 0.63** 0.90** 0.49** -0.43**
BR -0.04 ns 0.24 ns 0.46 * 0.56** 0.38** -0.01ns 0.39**
LI 0.82** 0.51** 0.20 ns 0.36** 0.14 ns -0.42** 0.64** -0.44**
Open in a new tab

Levels of significance indicated: ns = not significant. NL: N3 internode length, ND: N3 internode diameter, FW: stem fresh weight, NDW: N3 internode dry weight, DWUL: N3 internode dry weight per unit length, BM: bending moment, BR: breaking resistance, LI: lodging index.

*significant atP≤0.05

**significant atP≤0.01. SL: stem length from the base of N3 internode to the tip of the panicle

Lodging-related traits were correlated with grain yield in 2013 and 2014, which was shown in Figs 4 and 5. Significant quadratic relationships (p<0.05) between SL and grain yield, and between NL and grain yield were observed in both 2013 and 2014 (Fig 4A, 4B, 4C and 4D). Grain yield increased with the drastic reduction in SL after 1940s, and then with slightly increase in SL after 1980s (Fig 4A and 4B). Grain yield was significantly (p<0.05) correlated with ND and FW in both 2013 and 2014 (Fig 4E, 4F, 4G and 4H). No significant relationship was observed between NDW and grain yield (Fig 4I and 4J). There were significant differences in DWUL among these varieties, but no relationship between changes in DWUL and grain yield (Fig 5A and 5B). Significant linear correlation between BR and grain yield was found in 2013 and 2014 (Fig 5C and 5D), but no consistent relationship between BM and grain yield was observed in the two years (Fig 5E and 5F). Significant quadratic relationship between LI and grain yield was observed in both years, suggesting that increase in grain yield was associated with a decrease in lodging index (Fig 5G and 5H).

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Open in a new tab

The correlation between grain yield and SL (A, B), NL (C, D), ND (E, F), FW (G, H) and NDW (I, J) of the rice varieties grown in 2013 and 2014. SL: stem length from the base of N3 internode to the tip of the panicle, NL: N3 internode length, ND: N3 internode diameter, FW: stem fresh weight, NDW: N3 internode dry weight.

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Open in a new tab

The correlation between grain yield and DWUL (A, B), BM (C, D), BR (E, F) and LI (G, H) of the rice varieties grown in 2013 and 2014. DWUL: N3 internode dry weight per unit length, BM: bending moment, BR: breaking resistance, LI: lodging index.

Discussion

Grain yield was greatly improved due to the genetic improvement and the adoption of optimized crop management practices[25–26]. The national average rice grain yield has risen to about 6.4 t ha-1 in China in 2000’s, which has greatly contributed to food security in China[27–28]. New rice hybrids with high grain yield potential have been developed and are being grown on a large scale. According to our previous study, grain yield was increased from 4 ha-1 to 10 ha-1 with the genetic progress, and the increases in biomass production and sink size (spikelets per panicle) were responsible for the grain yield improvement[25, 29–30]. However, lodging is frequently occurred leading to reduction in grain yield [7], especially in high-yielding environments[14]. The reduction in grain yield due to lodging could be up to 50%[31]. Meanwhile, the occurrence of lodging resulted in deterioration of grain quality[20].

In order to reduce the occurrence of lodging in rice production, breeders have utilized the semi-dwarfing genes to produce shorter varieties[32]. This was reflected from the decrease in stem length and internode length when compared with a tall variety SLX (Fig 2A–2D). The adoption of semi-dwarfing rice varieties has significantly increased grain yield potential of rice, however, increasing evidences suggest that further increase in rice yield potential is restricted by plant height[21]. Therefore, breeders tended to select varieties with increased plant height after 1980s to further increase grain yield (Fig 4A and 4B)[17, 33–37].

LI of the short varieties was significantly reduced compared with that of SLX, while no significant (p>0.05) trend was observed in the changes of LI along with the year of release of the varieties except for SLX (Fig 3G and 3H). In the present study, determine coefficient of the correlation between LI and BM was larger than that between LI and BR, indicating that BM was more related with the changes in LI along with the year of release of these varieties (Table 4). Although BM of new varieties developed after 2000s was similar with that of SLX, LI of these new varieties was significantly lower than that of SLX due to the significantly higher BR (Fig 3C–3F). This is consistent with Islam et al. (2007) that plant height was not necessarily the most important factor determining LI[14]. Stem diameter, stem weight, leaf sheath wrapping, basal internode diameter and the cross-section area of the culm are the major traits affecting LI[38–39]. The N3 internode diameter and stem fresh weight were significantly increased along with the year of release (p<0.05), especially after 1980s (Fig 1E–1H). No significant change (p>0.05) was observed in N3 internode dry weight and dry weight per unit of length (Fig 2I and 2J and Fig 3A and 3B).

According to the Visual Score of Lodging (VSL) in both year's experiment (Table 3), the green revolution significantly reduced lodging risk in semi-dwarf rice variety. The tall variety of SLX had the maximum VSL in both years, which was attributed to their slender stature. The lodging score was much lower in semi-dwarf rice variety compared with SLX, however, semi-dwarf rice variety, such as AZZ, GCA and ZZA, was also medium lodged in 2013 or 2014 (Table 3). This was because the lower BR in AZZ (601 and 779 g cm) and GCA (663 and 780 g cm), and the lower NDW in ZZA (2.8 and 3.0 g). As for the modern rice variety, the lodging was due to the overweight in upper part of the plant. The enlarged sink size of modern rice variety with great yield potential resulted from larger panicles or heavy panicles[6, 25, 30], which exerted greater pressures to the lower internode. Although both ND and BR of modern rice varieties were enhanced significantly with year of release (Fig 2E and 2F and Fig 3C and 3D), the increased SL, NL, FW and BM may counteract their resistance contribution (Figs 2 and 3). So the occurrence of lodging is common in hybrid and super-hybrid rice production[14], especially under high-yielding environments[7]. The variation of the lodging-related traits in same variety in the 2 year's experiment like NDW, VSL was due to the big difference in weather condition in 2013 and 2014. The average daily maximum and minimum temperature during the growing season was 31.5 and 23.2°C in 2013, respectively, and 30.1 and 22.5°C in 2014, respectively. The mean daily solar radiation from May to October was 16.4 and 13.3 MJ m−2 day−1 in 2013 and 2014, respectively. The average daily maximum and minimum temperature during the growing season was 1.4 and 0.7°C higher in 2013 than in 2014, respectively. The mean daily solar radiation from May to October in 2013 was 23.3% higher than that in 2014. The weather condition was introduced in our previous study [30]. In addition, there was a big storm during grain filling stage in 2014. So, some varieties showed poor repeatability in our study, such as AZZ showed 7 VSL in 2014 but 0 in 2013. And same situation was showed in other study [14].

Correlation analysis showed that SL and NL significant positive correlated with LI (Table 4). This is inconsistent with the results of Islam et al. (2007) that there was no correlation between culm height and lodging index of lower internodes[14]. Plant height was not necessarily the most important factor in determining lodging resistance[40], but long culm length and large leaf area index of hybrid rice may cause an increase in bending moment[41], resulting in high lodging index[14]. In addition, DWUL was negative correlated with LI significantly (Table 4) despite NDW and DWUL was not enhanced with year of release. Studies have shown that both dry weight of internode per unit length and internode diameter contributed to the high breaking resistance of lower internodes[14]. What is more, internode dry weight has been reported to be negatively correlated with the lodging score in the field and positively correlated with the breaking strength of wheat straw[39]. These results suggest that further increase in ND, NDW and DWUL of lower internode in modern super rice variety by genetic could effectively enhance lodging resistance and bring down LI. Therefore, it is a feasible pathway to improve the lodging resistance of super rice by selecting genotypes with high BR, high ND, high NDW, high DWUL, and low LI at lower internodes.

Conclusion

Significant differences in the lodging-related traits were observed along with the release year of the varieties. Lodging index was significantly reduced with the adoption of semi-dwarf varieties. There was no significant relationship between LI and the release year for the semi-dwarf varieties, although significant differences in LI was observed among these varieties. Significantly higher breaking resistance contributed to maintain a lower LI for the newer varieties with higher plant height and similar breaking moment with SLX. Internode diameter and stem fresh weight were significantly increased along with the release year of the varieties, which resulted in the significantly increasing BR.

Acknowledgments

Funding was provided by the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest of China from the Ministry of Agriculture (No. 201203096) and the Key Technology Program R&D of Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (No. 2012BAD04B12).

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding Statement

Funding was provided by the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest of China from the Ministry of Agriculture (No. 201203096) and the Key Technology Program R&D of Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (No. 2012BAD04B12).

References

  • 1.Peng S, Laza R, Visperas R, khush G, Virk P. Progress in breeding the new plant type for yield improvement: A physiological view In: Toriyama K. et al. , editors, Rice is life: Scientific perspectives for the 21 st century. IRRI, Manila, Philippines: 2005; 130–132. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tang S, Ding L, Bonjean AP. Rice production and genetic improvement in China. Cereals in China. 2010; 15. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gu MH. Discussion on the aspects of high-yielding breeding in rice. Acta Agronomica Sinica. 2010; 36: 1431–1439. (in Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Peng SB, Khush GS, Virk P, Tang QY, Zou YB. Progress in ideotype breeding to increase rice yield potential. Field Crops Res. 2008; 108: 32–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.He Z, Xia X, Peng S, Lumpkin T. Meeting demands for increased cereal production in China, Journal of Cereal Science. 2014; 59: 235–244. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang YB, Tang QY, Zou YB, Li DQ, Qin JQ, Yang SH, et al. Yield potential and radiation use efficiency of “super” hybrid rice grown under subtropical conditions. Field Crops Res. 2009; 114: 91–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Setter TL, Laureles EV, Mazaredo AM. Lodging reduces yield of rice by self-shading and reduction in canopy photosynthesis. Field Crops Res. 1997; 49: 95–106. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pham QD, Akira A, Hirano M, Sagawa S, Kuroda E. Analysis of lodging resistant characteristics of different rice genotypes grown under the standard and nitrogen-free basal dressing accompanied with sparse planting density practices. Plant Prod. Sci. 2004; 7: 243–251. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hitaka H. Studies on the lodging of rice plants. Jpn. Agric. Res. Quart. 1969; 4(3): 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kashiwagi T, Sasaki H, Ishimaru K. Factors responsible for decreasing sturdiness of the lower part in lodging of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Prod. Sci. 2005; 8 (2): 166–172. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kono M. Physiological aspects of lodging. Science of the rice. 1995; 2: 971–982. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hoshikawa KA, Wang SB. Studies on lodging in rice plants. I. A general observation on lodged rice culms. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 1990; 59: 809–814. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chandler JR, Robert F. Plant morphology and stand geometry in relation to nitrogen In: Eastin J.D., Haskins F.A., Sullivan C.Y., van Bavel C.H.M.(Eds.), Physiological Aspects of Crop Yield. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin: 1969; pp: 265–285. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Islam MS, Peng S, Visperas RM, Ereful N, Bhuiya MSU, Julfiquar AW. Lodging-related morphological traits of hybrid rice in a tropical irrigated ecosystem. Field Crops Res. 2007; 101: 240–248. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kuroda E, Ookawa T, Ishihara K. Analysis on difference of dry matter production between rice cultivars with different plant height in relation to gas diffusion inside stands. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 1989; 58(3): 374–382. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gent MPN. Canopy light interception, gas exchange, and biomass in reduced height isolines of winter wheat. Crop Sci. 1995; 35: 1636–1642. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Miralles DJ, Slafer A. Individual grain weight responses to genetic reduction in culm length in wheat as affected by source-sink manipulations. Field Crops Res. 1995; 43: 55–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Parker SR, Lovel DJ, Foulkes MJ, Worland AJ, Paveley ND. Improving and exploiting self defence against wheat diseases. In: Proceedings of the Brighton crop protection conference, pests and diseases. 2002; pp: 919–924.
  • 19.Cosser ND, Gooding MJ, Thompson AJ, Froud-Williams R.J. Competitive ability and tolerance of organically grown wheat cultivars to natural weed infestations. Ann Appl Biol. 1997; 130: 523–535. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Berry PM, Sterling M, Spink JH, Baker CJ, Sylvester-Bradley R, Mooney SJ, et al. Understanding and reducing lodging in cereals. Advances in Agronomy. 2004; 84: 217–271. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Berry PM, Sylvester-Bradley R, Berry S. Ideotype design for lodging-proof wheat. Euphytica. 2007; 154: 165–179. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Berry PM, Kendall S, Rutterford Z, Orford S, Griffiths S. Historical analysis of the effects of breeding on the height of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) and consequences for lodging. Euphytica. 2015; 203: 375–383. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Amano T, Zhu Q, Wang Y, Inoue N, Tanaka H. Case studies on high yields of paddy rice in Jiangsu Province, China. II. Analysis of characters related to lodging. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 1993; 62 (2): 275–281. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wu W, Huang J, Cui K, Nie L, Wang Q, Yang F, et al. Sheath blight reduces stem breaking resistance and increases lodging susceptibility of rice plants. Field Crops Res. 2012; 128: 101–108. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang H, Chen T, Liu L, Wang Z, Yang J, Zhang J. Performance in grain yield and physiological traits in the Yangtze River Basin of China during the last 60 yr. J. Integr. Agr. 2013; 12: 57–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liu LJ, Zhang H, Ju CX, Xiong YW, Bian JL, Zhao BH, et al. Changes in Grain Yield and Root Morphology and Physiology of Mid-Season Rice in the Yangtze River Basin of China During the Last 60 Years. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2014; 6(7): 1916–9760. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cheng SH, Zhuang JY, Fan YY, Du JH, Cao LY. Progress in research and development on hybrid rice: A super domesticate in China. Annals of Botany. 2007;100: 959–966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Peng SB, Tang QY, Zou YB. Current status and challenges of rice production in China. Plant Production Science. 2009;12, 3–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ao HJ, Wang S, Zou Y, Peng S, Tang Q, Fang Y, et al. Study on yield stability and dry matter characteristics of super hybridrice. Scientia Agricultura Sinica. 2008; 41:1927–1936. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhu G, Peng S, Huang J, Cui K, Nie L, Wang F. Genetic improvement in rice yield and concomitant increases in radiation- and nitrogen-use efficiency in Middle Reaches of Yangtze River. Sci. Rep. 2016; 6: 21049 doi: 10.1038/srep21049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Stapper M, Fischer RA. Genotype, sowing date and plant spacing influence on high-yielding irrigated wheat in Southern New South Wales. II. Growth, yield and nitrogen use. Aust J Agric Res. 1990; 41:1021–1041. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wilhelm EP, Boulton MI, Barber TES, Greenland AJ, Powell W. Genotype analysis of the wheat semi-dwarf Rht-B1b and Rht-D1b ancestral lineage. Plant Breed. 2013;132: 539–545. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Allan RE. Agronomic comparisons among wheat lines nearly isogenic for three reduced height genes. Crop Science.1986; 26: 707–710. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kertesz Z, Flintham JE, Gale MD. Effects of Rht dwarfing genes on wheat grain yield and its components under Eastern European conditions. Cereal Res Commun. 1991; 19: 297–304. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Richards RA. The effect of dwarfing genes in spring wheat in dry environments. I. Agronomic characteristics. Aust J Agric Res. 1992; 43: 517–527. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Baylan HS, Singh O. Pleiotropic effects of GA-insensitive Rht genes on grain yield and its component characters in wheat. Cereal Res Commun. 1994; 22: 195–200. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Flintham JE, Borner A, Worland AJ, Gale MD. Optimizing wheat grain yield: effects of Rht (gibberellin-insensitive) dwarfing genes. J Agric Sci. 1997; 128: 11–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chang TT, Vergara BS. Ecological and genetic information on adaptability and yielding ability in tropical varieties In: Rice Breeding, International Rice Research Institute, Manila (Philippines) 1972; pp: 431–453. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zuber U, Winzeler H, Messmer MM, Keller M, Keller B, Schmid JE, et al. Morphological traits associated with lodging resistance of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Agron. Crop Sci. 1999; 182: 17–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ookawa T, Ishihara K. Varietal differences of physical characteristics of the culm related to lodging in paddy rice. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 1992; 61: 419–425. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Laza MRC, Peng S, Sanico AL, Visperas RM, Akita S. Higher leaf area growth rate contributes to greater vegetative growth of F1 rice hybrids in the tropics. Plant Prod. Sci. 2001; 4(3): 184–188. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper.

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES