Graphical abstract
A Path Less Travelled. The canonical SN2 behavior displayed by alcohols and activated alkyl halides in basic media (O-alkylation) is superseded by a pathway leading to carbinol C-alkylation under the conditions of rhodium catalyzed transfer hydrogenation. Racemic and asymmetric propargylations are described.
Keywords: Rhodium, Propargylation, Homopropargyl Alcohols, Transfer Hydrogenation, BINAP
The merger of carbonyl addition and transfer hydrogenation has enabled a new class of metal catalyzed C-C couplings wherein lower alcohols are convert directly to higher alcohols.1 Three mechanistic pathways are corroborated, in which alcohol dehydrogenation mediates (a) C-C π-bond hydrometalation (IrI, RuII), (b) metalacycle transfer hydrogenolysis (Ru0, Os0) or (c) C-X bond reductive cleavage (IrI).[1] In the latter context, iridium-based catalysts operate exclusively, promoting the coupling of primary alcohols with a diverse array of allylic carboxylates[2a-d] and related pronucleophiles, such as vinyl epoxides[2e] and vinyl aziridines.[2f] The identification of metal catalysts beyond iridium that promote alcohol C-H functionalization via C-X bond reductive cleavage pathways should enable further expansion of scope. Rhodium-based catalysts, being isostructural with respective to iridium, were viewed as promising candidates. However, rhodium is used less frequently than iridium in transfer hydrogenation,[3] with the vast majority of examples involving analogues of the classic ruthenium-based system RuCl(Tsdpen)(η6-arene).[4,5b-e] Indeed, rhodium analogues of the broadly utilized cyclometalated π-allyliridium ortho-C,O-benzoate complexes developed in our laboratory have not yet proven effective (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Rhodium vs iridium catalysts for redox-triggered carbonyl addition.
As the pronucleophile serves as oxidant in all transfer hydrogenative couplings, we reasoned that more easily reduced pronucleophiles might be accommodated by rhodium, which is a weaker reductant than iridium.[6] Accordingly, we turned our attention to the redox-triggered coupling of primary alcohols with propargyl chloride with the goal of developing methods for enantioselective carbonyl propargylation (Figure 2).[7-15] In earlier work from our laboratory,[16] an iridium-catalyzed transfer hydrogenative carbonyl propargylation was developed (eq. 1),[16c] but suffered from two severe limitations in scope: (a) trialkylsilyl substitution was required at the acetylenic terminus of the propargyl chloride, and (b) only benzylic alcohols would participate in C-C coupling. To determine whether rhodium catalysts could overcome these restrictions, a series of experiments were performed (Scheme 1). The rhodium analogue of the optimal iridium catalyst identified for the coupling of the silyl-terminated propargyl chloride 1a with benzyl alcohols was prepared and evaluated in the coupling of benzylic alcohol 2b with the unsubstituted propargyl chloride 1b. The desired product, homopropargyl alcohol 3b, was obtained in 23% yield (eq. 2). Further improvements in the yield of 3b were obtained by conducting the reaction at 40 °C in toluene – a remarkably low temperature for alcohol dehydrogenation – using a neutral rhodium-BINAP catalyst and increasing the loading of propargyl chloride 1b (1000 mol%). Applied in concert, these changes enabled formation of homopropargyl alcohol 3b in 80% yield (eq. 3). Reactions conducted at lower loading of 1b (500 mol%) under otherwise identical conditions led to a modest but significant decrease in the yield of 3b (10-15% lower). A comparable decrease in the yield of 3b is observed upon omission of 2-propanol. Remarkably, products of O-propargylation via SN2 substitution were not observed.[17]
Figure 2.
Selected methods for enantioselective carbonyl propargylation.[17-15]
Scheme 1.
Selected experiments in the development of rhodium catalyzed transfer hydrogenative propargylation.a
aYields are of material isolated by silica gel chromatography. See Supporting Information for further experimental details.
To establish the generality of these conditions, in particular, the ability to engage aliphatic alcohols in C-propargylation, these conditions were applied to primary alcohols 2a-2o (Table 1). Benzylic alcohols 2a-2h, including ortho-substituted benzylic alcohol 2f and heteroaromatic benzylic alcohol 2h were converted to the corresponding homopropargylic alcohols 3a-3h in good to excellent yield. Remarkably, allylic alcohols 2i and 2j were converted to homopropargyl alcohols 3i and 3j without competing internal redox isomerization.18 Most importantly, aliphatic alcohols 2k-2o were converted to the homopropargylic alcohols 3k-3o, respectively, in good yield. Finally, as illustrated in the conversion of dehydro-2b to homopropargyl alcohol 3b, these conditions are applicable to the 2-propanol mediated reductive coupling of propargyl chloride 1b with aldehydes (eq. 4).
Table 1.
Rhodium catalyzed C-C coupling of propargyl chloride 1b with alcohols 2a-2o to form homopropargyl alcohols 3a-3o.a
Yields are of material isolated by silica gel chromatography. See Supporting Information for further experimental details.
b2-PrOH was omitted.
![]() |
(Eq. 4) |
Products 3a-3o were generated using a racemic rhodium-BINAP catalyst (Table 1). Using enantiomerically pure BINAP, moderate levels of enantioselectivity are observed (40-55%ee). Efforts to improve enantioselectivity while maintaining high levels of conversion have, thus far, been unrequited. Hence, match-mismatch effects in the C-propargylation of the enantiomerically enriched α-stereogenic amino alcohol 2p were explored (eq. 5). First, to establish the intrinsic diastereofacial bias, the rhodium catalyst modified by racemic BINAP was used. The anti- and syn-diastereomers 3p and epi-3p are formed in a 2.3:1 ratio, respectively. This diastereofacial bias suggests intervention of an internal NH-O hydrogen bond in the transient aldehyde dehydro-2p, which directs carbonyl addition to the sterically less encumbered face of the chelate. When the propargylation is conducted using (S)-BINAP, the mismatched case, 3p and epi-3p are in formed in a 1:2.6 ratio, respectively. When the reaction is conducted using (R)-BINAP (the matched case), 3p and epi-3p are formed in a 5:1 ratio, respectively. It was reasoned that reactions conducted in a lower dielectric medium more conducive to hydrogen bonding would display higher diastereoselectivities. Indeed, in toluene, 3p and epi-3p are in formed in an 11:1 ratio, respectively, albeit in slightly lower yield.
Table 2.
Rhodium catalyzed C-C coupling of propargyl chloride 1b with α-amino alcohols 2p-2u to form homopropargyl alcohols 3p-3u.a
Yields are of material isolated by silica gel chromatography. See Supporting Information for further experimental details.
bToluene (1.0 M)
![]() |
(Eq. 5) |
These conditions were applied to C-propargylation of enantiomerically enriched α-amino alcohols 2p-2u (Table 2). Due to solubility issues, it was necessary to use THF as solvent. Nevertheless, the products of asymmetric C-propargylation 3p-3u were formed in a stereoselective manner, with diastereoselectivities increasing with increasing size of the α-substituent. HPLC Analysis of adduct 3p prepared through asymmetric propargylation was compared to a mixture of all 4 stereoisomers, revealing that racemization of the transient aldehyde does not occur (see Supporting Information).
Although at this early stage precise details of the catalytic mechanism are unknown, a very simple working model has been proposed as a basis for further refinement (Scheme 2). It is postulated that catalysis is initiated by oxidative addition of propargyl chloride 1b to rhodium complex I to form the η1-allenylrhodium(III) complex III. Precedent for this step in the catalytic mechanism is found in the oxidative addition of propargyl chloride 1b to Vaska’s complex, which provides well defined η1-allenyliridium(III) complexes.19 Equilibration may occur between η1-allenylrhodium(III) complex III and propargylrhodium(III) complex II, however, the η1-allenylmetal isomers are thermodynamically preferred.20 Complex III undergoes substitution with benzyl alcohol 2a to form the rhodium(III) alkoxide complex IV, which upon β-hydride elimination generates the rhodium(III) hydrochloride complex V and the aldehyde dehydro-2a. At this stage, complex V may undergo C-H reductive elimination to form propyne, which may account for the requirement of relatively high loadings of propargyl chloride 1b. An ion consistent with the molecular weight of propyne (or allene) is observed by GC-MS analysis of aliquots taken from reaction mixtures in the coupling of propargyl chloride 1b and benzyl alcohol 2a. This pathway, which effects net catalytic transfer hydrogenolysis of propargyl chloride 1b, delivers unreacted aldehyde, which is converted back to the alcohol by 2-propanol-mediated reduction, reinitiating the catalytic cycle. Nonconjugated aldehydes derived from alcohols 2k-2u appear more reactive toward addition. Hence, 2-propanol is not required. Alternatively, complex V may eliminate HCl with the assistance of base, as documented in stoichiometric transformations.21 The latter pathway delivers the η1-allenylrhodium(I) complex VI, which coordinates aldehyde to form complex VII, which, in turn, triggers carbonyl addition to generate the homoallylic rhodium(I) alkoxide VIII. Protonolytic cleavage then releases the homopropargylic alcohol 3a and regenerates complex I to close the catalytic cycle. The stereochemistry of the octahedral complexes II-V should be considered tentative.
Scheme 2.
General catalytic mechanism for rhodium catalyzed alcohol C-propargylation..a
In summary, new reactivity is the most fundamental basis for innovation in the field of chemical synthesis. Here, using the concepts of C-C bond formation transfer hydrogenation pioneered in our laboratory, the canonical SN2 behavior displayed by alcohols and activated alkyl halides in basic media (O-alkylation) is superseded by an alternate pathway leading to products of carbinol C-alkylation. This method enables direct conversion of primary alcohols, including simple aliphatic alcohols, to secondary homopropargyl alcohols using inexpensive, commercial reagents. More broadly, these studies further demonstrate how the native reducing features of alcohol reactants can mediate reductive carbonyl addition, thus bypassing preformed carbanions or stoichiometric metallic reductants.
Supplementary Material
Footnotes
Acknowledgment is made to the Robert A. Welch Foundation (F-0038) and the NIH (RO1-GM069445) for partial support of this research.
References
- [1].Ketcham JM, Shin I, Montgomery TP, Krische MJ. Angew. Chem. 2014;126:9294–9302. doi: 10.1002/anie.201403873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;53:9142–9150. doi: 10.1002/anie.201403873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].a) Kim IS, Ngai M-Y, Krische MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:14891–14899. doi: 10.1021/ja805722e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Kim IS, Han SB, Krische MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:2514–2520. doi: 10.1021/ja808857w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Zhang YJ, Yang JH, Kim SH, Krische MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:4562–4563. doi: 10.1021/ja100949e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Hassan A, Zbieg JR, Krische MJ. Angew. Chem. 2011;123:3555–3558. doi: 10.1002/anie.201100646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011;50:3493–3496. doi: 10.1002/anie.201100646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Montgomery TP, Hassan A, Park BY, Krische MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:11100–11103. doi: 10.1021/ja303839h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Feng J, Garza VJ, Krische MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:8911–8914. doi: 10.1021/ja504625m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Wang G, Franke J, Ngo CQ, Krische MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:7915–7920. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b04404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Suzuki T. Chem. Rev. 2011;111:1825–1845. doi: 10.1021/cr100378r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Hashiguchi S, Fujii A, Takehara J, Ikariya T, Noyori R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995;117:7562–7563. [Google Scholar]
- [5].a) Imai H, Nishiguchi T, Fukuzumi K. J. Org. Chem. 1974;39:1622–1627. [Google Scholar]; b) Murata K, Ikariya T. J. Org. Chem. 1999;64:2186–2187. [Google Scholar]; c) Ikariya T, Blacker AJ. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007;40:1300–1308. doi: 10.1021/ar700134q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Zaitsev AB, Adolfsson H. Org. Lett. 2006;8:5129–5132. doi: 10.1021/ol062227q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Ahlford K, Ekström J, Zaitsev AB, Ryberg P, Eriksson L, Adolfsson H. Chem. Eur. J. 2009;15:11197–11209. doi: 10.1002/chem.200900548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].a) Li J, Schreckenbach G, Ziegler T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995;117:486–494. This assertion is consistent with the energy of infrared radiation absorbed by isostructural carbonyl complexes of iridium and rhodium, (Ph3P)2M(Cl)(CO), M = Ir, νco = 1965 cm−1; M = Rh, νco = 1980 cm−1. [Google Scholar]; b) Vaska L, Peone J. Chem. Commun. 1971:418–419. [Google Scholar]; c) Haynes A, McNish J, Pearson JM. J. Organomet. Chem. 1998;551:339–347. [Google Scholar]; d) Grotjahn DB, Collins LSB, Wolpert M, Bikzhanova GA, Lo HC, Combs D, Hubbard JL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:8260–8270. doi: 10.1021/ja004324z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].a) Ding C-H, Lou X-L. Chem. Rev. 2011;111:1914–1937. doi: 10.1021/cr100284m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Wisniewska HM, Jarvo ER. J. Org. Chem. 2013;78:11629–11636. doi: 10.1021/jo4019107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].a) Haruta R, Ishiguro M, Ikeda N, Yamamoto H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982;104:7667–7669. [Google Scholar]; b) Corey EJ, Yu C-M, Lee DH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990;112:878–879. [Google Scholar]; c) Lai C, Soderquist JA. Org. Lett. 2005;7:799–802. doi: 10.1021/ol0476164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Hernandez E, Burgos CH, Alicea E, Soderquist JA. Org. Lett. 2006;8:4089–4091. doi: 10.1021/ol061596j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Minowa N, Mukaiyama T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1987;60:3697–3704. [Google Scholar]
- [10].a) Marshall JA, Wang X-J. J. Org. Chem. 1991;56:3211–3213. Allenyltin Reagents: [Google Scholar]; b) Marshall JA, Maxson K. J. Org. Chem. 2000;65:630–633. doi: 10.1021/jo991543y. Allenylsilicon Reagents: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Brawn RA, Panek JS. Org. Lett. 2007;9:2689–2692. doi: 10.1021/ol070936d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Matsumoto Y, Naito M, Uozumi Y, Hayashi T. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993:1468–1469. Allenylboron Reagents: [Google Scholar]; e) Marshall JA, Adams ND. J. Org. Chem. 1998;63:3812–3813. Allenylzinc Reagents: [Google Scholar]; f) Marshall JA, Adams ND. J. Org. Chem. 1999;64:5201–5204. doi: 10.1021/jo9823083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Marino JP, McClure MS, Holub DP, Comasseto JV, Tucci FC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:1664–1668. doi: 10.1021/ja017177t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].a) Keck GE, Krishnamurthy D, Chen X. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994;35:8323–8324. Metal/Lewis Base Catalyzed Enantioselective Propargylation using Allenyl Tin Reagents: [Google Scholar]; b) Yu C-M, Yoon S-K, Choi H-S, Baek K. Chem. Commun. 1997:763–764. [Google Scholar]; c) Yu C-M, Choi H-S, Yoon S-K, Jung W-H. Synlett. 1997:889–890. [Google Scholar]; d) Yu C-M, Yoon S-K, Baek K, Lee J-Y. Angew. Chem. 1998;110:2504–2506. [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998;37:2392–2395. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19980918)37:17<2392::AID-ANIE2392>3.0.CO;2-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Konishi S, Hanawa H, Maruoka K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2003;14:1603–1605. [Google Scholar]; f) Denmark SE, Wynn T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:6199–6200. doi: 10.1021/ja016017e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].a) Iseki K, Kuroki Y, Kobayashi Y. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 1998;9:2889–2894. Metal/Lewis Base Catalyzed Enantioselective Propargylation using Allenyl Silicon Reagents: [Google Scholar]; b) Evans DA, Sweeney ZK, Rovis T, Tedrow JS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:12095–12096. doi: 10.1021/ja011983i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Nakajima M, Saito M, Hashimoto S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2002;13:2449–2452. [Google Scholar]; d) Chen J, Captain B, Takenaka N. Org. Lett. 2011;13:1654–1657. doi: 10.1021/ol200102c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].a) Shi S-L, Xu L-W, Oisaki K, Kanai M, Shibasaki M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:6638–6639. doi: 10.1021/ja101948s. Copper Catalyzed Enantioselective Propargylation using Allenyl/Propargyl Boron Reagents: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Fandrick DR, Fandrick KR, Reeves JT, Tan Z, Tang W, Capacci AG, Rodriguez S, Song JJ, Lee H, Yee NK, Senanayake CH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:7600–7601. doi: 10.1021/ja103312x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Fandrick KR, Fandrick DR, Reeves JT, Gao J, Ma S, Li W, Lee H, Grinberg N, Lu B, Senanayake CH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:10332–10335. doi: 10.1021/ja2028958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Fandrick KR, Ogikubo J, Fandrick DR, Patel ND, Saha J, Lee H, Ma S, Grinberg N, Busacca CA, Senanayake CH. Org. Lett. 2013;15:1214–1217. doi: 10.1021/ol400124f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Wei X-F, Shimizu Y, Kanai M. ACS Cent. Sci. 2016;2:21–26. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.5b00360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].a) Barnett DS, Schaus SE. Org. Lett. 2011;13:4020–4023. doi: 10.1021/ol201535b. H-Bond Catalyzed Enantioselective Propargylation using Allenyl Boron Reagents: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Jain P, Wang H, Houk KN, Antilla JC. Angew. Chem. 2012;124:1420–1423. doi: 10.1002/anie.201107407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:1391–1394. doi: 10.1002/anie.201107407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Reddy LR. Org. Lett. 2012;14:1142–1145. doi: 10.1021/ol300075n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].a) Bandini M, Cozzi PG, Umani-Ronchi A. Polyhedron. 2000;19:537–539. Catalytic Enantioselective Propargylation via Nozaki-Hiyama-Kishi Reaction: [Google Scholar]; b) Bandini M, Cozzi PG, Melchiorre P, Tino R, Umani-Ronchi A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2001;12:1063–1069. [Google Scholar]; c) Inoue M, Nakada M. Org. Lett. 2004;6:2977–2980. doi: 10.1021/ol048826j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Naodovic M, Xia G, Yamamoto H. Org. Lett. 2008;10:4053–4055. doi: 10.1021/ol801452c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Liu S, Kim JT, Dong C-G, Kishi Y. Org. Lett. 2009;11:4520–4523. doi: 10.1021/ol9016595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Harper KC, Sigman MS. Science. 2011;333:1875–1878. doi: 10.1126/science.1206997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].a) Patman RL, Williams VM, Bower JF, Krische MJ. Angew. Chem. 2008;120:5298–5301. doi: 10.1002/anie.200801359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008;47:5220–5223. doi: 10.1002/anie.200801359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Geary LM, Woo SK, Leung JC, Krische MJ. Angew. Chem. 2012;124:3026–3030. doi: 10.1002/anie.201200239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:2972–2976. doi: 10.1002/anie.201200239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Woo SK, Geary LM, Krische MJ. Angew. Chem. 2012;124:7950–7954. doi: 10.1002/anie.201203334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:7830–7834. doi: 10.1002/anie.201203334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Geary LM, Leung JC, Krische MJ. Chem. Eur. J. 2012;18:16823–16827. doi: 10.1002/chem.201202446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Banerjee M, Roy S. Org. Lett. 2004;6:2137–2140. doi: 10.1021/ol0493352. Rhodium catalyzed reductive coupling of propargyl chloride 1b with aldehydes mediated by stoichiometric quantities of tin(II) oxide provides mixtures of allenic and homopropargylic alcohols: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].a) Mantilli L, Mazet C. Chem. Lett. 2011;40:341–344. [Google Scholar]; b) Cahard D, Gaillard S, Renaud J-L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015;56:6159–6169. [Google Scholar]
- [19].Collman JP, Cawse JN, Kang JW. Inorg. Chem. 1969;8:2574–2579. J. W. [Google Scholar]
- [20].Wojcicki A, Shuchart CE. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1990;105:35–60. [Google Scholar]
- [21].Schrock RR, Osborn JA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976;98:2134–2143. Stoichiometric deprotonation of cationic rhodium(III) dihydrides has been documented: [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.