Abstract
Mosquito-borne viruses are important causes of death and long-term neurologic disability due to encephalomyelitis. Studies of mice infected with the alphavirus Sindbis virus have shown that outcome is dependent on the age and genetic background of the mouse and virulence of the infecting virus. Age-dependent susceptibility reflects the acquisition by neurons of resistance to virus replication and virus-induced cell death with maturation. In mature mice, the populations of neurons most susceptible to infection are in the hippocampus and anterior horn of the spinal cord. Hippocampal infection leads to long-term memory deficits in mice that survive, while motor neuron infection can lead to paralysis and death. Neuronal death is immune-mediated, rather than a direct consequence of virus infection, and associated with entry and differentiation of pathogenic T helper 17 cells in the nervous system. To modulate glutamate excitotoxicity, mice were treated with an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptor antagonists or a glutamine antagonist. The N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist MK-801 protected hippocampal neurons but not motor neurons, and mice still became paralyzed and died. α-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptor antagonists GYKI-52466 and talampanel protected both hippocampal and motor neurons and prevented paralysis and death. Glutamine antagonist 6-diazo-5-l-norleucine protected hippocampal neurons and improved memory generation in mice surviving infection with an avirulent virus. Surprisingly, in all cases protection was associated with inhibition of the antiviral immune response, reduced entry of inflammatory cells into the central nervous system, and delayed virus clearance, emphasizing the importance of treatment approaches that include prevention of immunopathologic damage.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13311-016-0434-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: Glutamate excitotoxicity, Immunopathogenesis, Sindbis virus, AMPA receptor antagonist, Glutamine antagonist
Introduction
Viral encephalomyelitis can be a devastating disease for the infected individual and for society as a whole because those who recover are frequently left with neurological sequelae such as seizures, paralysis, and cognitive deficits [1]. Arthropod-borne (arbo) viruses are important causes of encephalomyelitis with widespread seasonal outbreaks of fever, encephalitis, and arthritis, and pose increasing threats to human populations through continued expansion into new geographic areas [2, 3]. Alphaviruses are mosquito-borne plus-strand-enveloped RNA viruses that cause both encephalomyelitis (Venezuelan, western and eastern equine encephalitis viruses) and arthritis (Sindbis, Ross River, and Chikungunya viruses). The encephalitic alphaviruses are endemic in the Americas, while the rapidly emerging arthritic alphaviruses that can also cause neurologic disease are now found worldwide [2, 4–7]. Currently, there are no treatments or vaccines licensed for these infections.
For all arboviruses, severity of disease and outcome after infection varies widely from one person to another. This review will cover our current knowledge of the pathogenesis of fatal encephalomyelitis, the determinants of variable outcome, and potential treatments for severe disease through the study of central nervous system (CNS) infection by the prototype alphavirus, Sindbis virus (SINV), in mice.
Neuronal Damage
Neurons are the primary target cells of encephalitic alphaviruses and the outcome of infection is determined both by neuronal maturity and infecting virus virulence. Susceptibility to fatal encephalomyelitis diminishes with increasing age [8], and this is not due to changes in the adaptive immune response, but rather to changes in the intrinsic susceptibility of immature and mature neurons to infection [9]. Neuroadapted strains of SINV (e.g., NSV) with improved replication in mature neurons can cause fatal encephalomyelitis in older mice, providing a model system for evaluation of therapeutic interventions. Populations of mature neurons that are particularly susceptible to infection are in the hippocampus and anterior horn of the spinal cord. NSV-infected motor neurons die by a nonapoptotic process [10], and mice develop weakness that progresses to paralysis and death within 7–10 days [11, 12].
Role of Neuronal Maturity
Immature neurons of all types replicate SINV (and other neurotropic arboviruses) to high titers that result in death due to apoptosis, while mature neurons restrict virus replication, are relatively resistant to virus-induced apoptosis, and can become persistently infected (Fig. 1a) [13–15]. Maturation-dependent restriction of virus replication is also observed in cultured primary neurons (e.g., dorsal root ganglia cells) and neuronal cell lines differentiated in vitro (e.g., CSM14.1, AP-7) (Fig. 1b), facilitating mechanistic studies [13, 16–18].
Neuronal maturation in the absence of infection is associated with increased expression of interferon (IFN)-β, transcription factors IFN regulatory factor (IRF)-3 and IRF-7, and several IFN-stimulated gene (ISG) mRNAs (e.g., 2,5OAS, RNaseL, β2 m, IFIT1, IFIT3, ISG20) [15]. IRF-7 is a key transcription factor, with multiple splice variants, that regulates and amplifies the IFN response through induction of the IFN-α genes, as well as ISGs [19]. The IRF-7 protein produced by neurons evolves with maturation from the short dominant negative γ isoform to the full-length active α isoform necessary for transcribing antiviral protein genes [15]. With maturation, uninfected neurons produce small amounts of IFN-β that results in priming the cell for an antiviral response. Neutralization of IFN increases replication of SINV, suggesting that the low levels of IFN constitutively produced by mature neurons are important for resistance [16]. In response to infection, differentiated, but not undifferentiated, neurons rapidly produce IFN and upregulate ISGs to restrict virus replication. Therefore, neuronal maturation is associated with antiviral priming characterized by increased basal levels of important transcription factors that rapidly activate antiviral signaling in response to infection, and thus reduce virus replication in mature neurons [15].
Role of Virus Strain
Alphaviruses have a message-sense RNA genome that encodes 4 nonstructural replication proteins (nsP1–4), 3 main structural proteins (capsid and envelope proteins E1 and E2), and 2 small proteins (6 K, TF). NSV is a neuroadapted strain of SINV that is virulent for adult C57BL/6 mice and provides a model for developing an understanding of virus-induced fatal encephalomyelitis in mature animals [20]. NSV has the same neuronal tropism as less virulent strains of SINV but replicates to higher titer and induces more intense inflammation in the brain and spinal cord [11, 21].
Virulence determinants are primarily in the E1 and E2 glycoproteins that regulate virus entry into neurons, alter glycosylation, and change binding to heparan sulfate [22–27]. In addition, recent studies have identified important roles for changes in nsP3, TF, and the 5’ nontranslated region that influence neuronal replication and alter virulence [28–30].
Role of the Immune Response
Virus clearance from neurons is accomplished through a synergistic process involving T-cell production of IFN-γ and B-cell production of antibody to the E2 glycoprotein [13, 31, 32]. Therefore, in response to infection, T-cell-mediated inflammation and B-cell infiltration into the CNS are necessary for virus clearance but need to be regulated to prevent damage to neural tissue [33].
Several observations have led to the conclusion that neuronal damage in mature animals is primarily due to the antiviral immune response rather than virus replication per se, and that fatal alphaviral encephalomyelitis is a T-cell-mediated immunopathologic process. For instance, initiation of virus clearance and the inflammatory response are coincident with the onset of neurological disease [21], and survival is improved in mice deficient in αβ T cells, β2-microglobulin, transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP), or CD4 but not in mice deficient in production of antibody, CD8, perforin, Fas, TNF-α receptor-1, IFN-γ, IFN-γ receptor-1, or IL-6 [34–36]. Furthermore, mice protected from fatal disease by passive transfer of immune serum after NSV infection clear infectious virus but develop a progressive loss of parenchyma (ex vacuo hydrocephalus) associated with infiltration of CD4+ T cells and macrophages into the hippocampus [35].
IL-10 is an important regulatory cytokine that helps to determine the balance between inflammation and immunoregulation [37, 38]. Deficiency of IL-10 accelerates the onset of fatal NSV-induced paralytic disease with an early increase in the CNS of CD4+ T cells expressing the transcription factor RORγt and producing the cytokine IL-17 [T helper (Th) 17 cells] [39]. Th17 cells are multifunctional and can have pathogenic or nonpathogenic characteristics. In response to NSV infection, Th17 cells in the CNS (but not in the draining lymph nodes) had a pathogenic phenotype with production of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granzyme B. In addition, some Th17 cells in the CNS developed into doubly pathogenic Th1/Th17 cells with additional expression of the transcription factor T-bet and production of IFN-γ. Although pathogenic Th17 cells are recognized to be effectors in autoimmune disease [40], they were not previously identified as contributors to virus-induced immunopathology [41].
These studies and comparative studies of BALB/c mice that are genetically resistant to fatal NSV-induced encephalomyelitis indicate the importance of IL-10 in regulating the immunopathogenic effects of antiviral T cells [42]. CD4+ T cells infiltrating the brains of BALB/c mice include fewer Th17 cells and more regulatory T cells producing IL-10 than similarly infected C57BL/6 mice [42]. In the absence of IL-10 BALB/c mice become susceptible to fatal infection. The primary sources of regulatory IL-10 during infection are the infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte populations, not myeloid cells intrinsic to the CNS [43].
Determination of the role of Th17 cells in NSV-induced immunopathology and identification of the mechanism(s) by which they influence outcome will be important for developing interventions and for identifying host determinants of susceptibility to severe disease. Th17 cells can directly target neurons [44], and under conditions of stress in vitro, neurons express IL-17 receptor and treatment with IL-17 can induce neuronal cell death [45]. GM-CSF has also been identified as a potential mediator of neural damage [46–49]. GM-CSF activates microglial cells and recruits myeloid cells into the CNS, but the mechanism by which this leads to disease has not been identified [47, 50, 51]. Furthermore, neutralizing antibody to neither GM-CSF nor IL-17 altered the course of disease compared with control antibody in either IL-10−/− or wild-type mice [39].
Prevention of Fatal Disease
Our studies indicate that development of successful treatments for viral encephalomyelitis requires a strategy to decrease immunopathologic damage either as a primary approach or as an adjunct to use of an antiviral drug. Damage to hippocampal and motor neurons suggested that glutamate excitotoxicity might play a role in inducing neuronal death. During infection, excess glutamate may result from extracellular release by damaged neurons or microglial cells [52], production by activated CD8+ T cells entering the CNS [53], or from failure of astrocytes to remove excess glutamate due to a cytokine-induced decrease in expression of glutamate transporter-1 [54, 55]. In vitro treatment of infected primary cortical neurons with N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists MK-801 and D(-)-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (APV) decreased cell death [56]. Although treatment of NSV-infected mice with MK-801 protected hippocampal neurons, it did not protect motor neurons or prevent paralysis and death of the mice (Fig. 2a) [57]. However, treatment of NSV-infected mice with α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonists GYKI-52466 or talampanel protected both hippocampal and motor neurons, improved outcome, and indicated that fatal disease is primarily due to infection of motor neurons rather than hippocampal neurons (Fig. 2a) [57, 58]. Surprisingly, upon examination of the mechanism of protection, it was discovered that AMPA receptor antagonists actually suppressed the antiviral immune response and subsequent entry of inflammatory cells into the CNS (Fig. 2b) [57, 58]. Protection occurred despite a resultant delay in virus clearance (Fig. 2c).
Nonfatal SINV infection of hippocampal neurons leads to persistent behavioral abnormalities. At the peak of infectious virus titers in brain (day 5), mice are hyperactive, have decreased anxiety, and memory deficits that persist after clearance of infectious virus and resolution of clinical signs of disease. Mice treated with 6-diazo-5-oxo-l-norleucine, a glutamine antagonist that affects both the immune response by inhibiting lymphocyte proliferation and glutamate excitotoxicity by inhibiting neuronal glutaminase synthesis of glutamate had decreased inflammatory cell infiltration and cell death in the hippocampus [59]. Treatment inhibited development of clinical signs and memory deficits revealed by assessing contextual fear conditioning (Fig. 3), despite the presence of infectious virus and high levels of viral RNA [60].
Future Directions
For both AMPA receptor and glutamine antagonists, inhibition of the inflammatory response in the CNS prevented fatal disease, despite also slowing virus clearance, further indicating that neuronal damage and fatal disease are due to the immune response to virus-infected neurons rather than virus infection per se. However, when treatment is stopped, the immune response may be initiated along with neurologic disease. Therefore, although there are no approved drugs that inhibit alphavirus replication, ideal treatment would likely combine immune response inhibitors with an antiviral drug.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgments
Work from the author’s laboratory was supported by research grants R01 NS087539 and NS038932 from the National Institutes of Health. The contributions of Victoria K. Baxter, Ivorlyne Greene, Kirsten A. Kulcsar, Sivabalan Manivannan, Jennifer Nargi-Aizenmann, Michelle C. Potter, Kimberly L. W. Schultz, and Barbara S. Slusher to the work described in this review are gratefully acknowledged.
Required Author Forms
Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the online version of this article.
References
- 1.Griffin DE. Emergence and re-emergence of viral diseases of the central nervous system. Prog Neurobiol. 2010;91:95–101. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Weaver SC, Forrester NL. Chikungunya: Evolutionary history and recent epidemic spread. Antiviral Res. 2015;120:32–39. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2015.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gubler DJ. The global emergence/resurgence of arboviral diseases as public health problems. Arch Med Res. 2002;33:330–342. doi: 10.1016/S0188-4409(02)00378-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chandak NH, Kashyap RS, Kabra D, et al. Neurological complications of Chikungunya virus infection. Neurol India. 2009;57:177–180. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.51289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Renault P, Solet JL, Sissoko D, et al. A major epidemic of chikungunya virus infection on Reunion Island, France, 2005–2006. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;77:727–731. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Harley D, Sleigh A, Ritchie S. Ross River virus transmission, infection, and disease: a cross-disciplinary review. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001;14:909–932. doi: 10.1128/CMR.14.4.909-932.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Weaver SC, Lecuit M. Chikungunya virus and the global spread of a mosquito-borne disease. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1231–1239. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1406035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Johnson RT, McFarland HF, Levy SE. Age-dependent resistance to viral encephalitis: studies of infections due to Sindbis virus in mice. J Infect Dis. 1972;125:257–262. doi: 10.1093/infdis/125.3.257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Griffin DE. Role of the immune response in age-dependent resistance of mice to encephalitis due to Sindbis virus. J Infect Dis. 1976;133:456–464. doi: 10.1093/infdis/133.4.456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Havert MB, Schofield B, Griffin DE, Irani DN. Activation of divergent neuronal cell death pathways in different target cell populations during neuroadapted Sindbis virus infection of mice. J Virol. 2000;74:5352–5356. doi: 10.1128/JVI.74.11.5352-5356.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jackson AC, Moench TR, Trapp BD, Griffin DE. Basis of neurovirulence in Sindbis virus encephalomyelitis of mice. Lab Invest. 1988;58:503–509. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Thach DC, Kimura T, Griffin DE. Differences between C57BL/6 and BALB/cBy mice in mortality and virus replication after intranasal infection with neuroadapted Sindbis virus. J Virol. 2000;74:6156–6161. doi: 10.1128/JVI.74.13.6156-6161.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Levine B, Hardwick JM, Trapp BD, Crawford TO, Bollinger RC, Griffin DE. Antibody-mediated clearance of alphavirus infection from neurons. Science. 1991;254:856–860. doi: 10.1126/science.1658936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Levine B, Huang Q, Isaacs JT, Reed JC, Griffin DE, Hardwick JM. Conversion of lytic to persistent alphavirus infection by the bcl-2 cellular oncogene. Nature. 1993;361:739–742. doi: 10.1038/361739a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Schultz KL, Vernon PS, Griffin DE. Differentiation of neurons restricts Arbovirus replication and increases expression of the alpha isoform of IRF-7. J Virol. 2015;89:48–60. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02394-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Vernon PS, Griffin DE. Characterization of an in vitro model of alphavirus infection of immature and mature neurons. J Virol. 2005;79:3438–3447. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.6.3438-3447.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ubol S, Levine B, Lee SH, Greenspan NS, Griffin DE. Roles of immunoglobulin valency and the heavy-chain constant domain in antibody-mediated downregulation of Sindbis virus replication in persistently infected neurons. J Virol. 1995;69:1990–1993. doi: 10.1128/jvi.69.3.1990-1993.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Burdeinick-Kerr R, Govindarajan D, Griffin DE. Noncytolytic clearance of Sindbis virus infection from neurons by gamma interferon is dependent on Jak/STAT signaling. J Virol. 2009;83:3429–3435. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02381-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Honda K, Yanai H, Negishi H, et al. IRF-7 is the master regulator of type-I interferon-dependent immune responses. Nature. 2005;434:772–777. doi: 10.1038/nature03464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Griffin DE, Johnson RT. Role of the immune response in recovery from Sindbis virus encephalitis in mice. J Immunol. 1977;118:1070–1075. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jackson AC, Moench TR, Griffin DE, Johnson RT. The pathogenesis of spinal cord involvement in the encephalomyelitis of mice caused by neuroadapted Sindbis virus infection. Lab Invest. 1987;56:418–423. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Knight RL, Schultz KL, Kent RJ, Venkatesan M, Griffin DE. Role of N-linked glycosylation for Sindbis virus infection and replication in vertebrate and invertebrate systems. J Virol. 2009;83:5640–5647. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02427-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bear JS, Byrnes AP, Griffin DE. Heparin-binding and patterns of virulence for two recombinant strains of Sindbis virus. Virology. 2006;347:183–190. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2005.11.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tucker PC, Griffin DE. Mechanism of altered Sindbis virus neurovirulence associated with a single-amino-acid change in the E2 glycoprotein. J Virol. 1991;65:1551–1557. doi: 10.1128/jvi.65.3.1551-1557.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tucker PC, Lee SH, Bui N, Martinie D, Griffin DE. Amino acid changes in the Sindbis virus E2 glycoprotein that increase neurovirulence improve entry into neuroblastoma cells. J Virol. 1997;71:6106–6112. doi: 10.1128/jvi.71.8.6106-6112.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tucker PC, Strauss EG, Kuhn RJ, Strauss JH, Griffin DE. Viral determinants of age-dependent virulence of Sindbis virus for mice. J Virol. 1993;67:4605–4610. doi: 10.1128/jvi.67.8.4605-4610.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Byrnes AP, Griffin DE. Binding of Sindbis virus to cell surface heparan sulfate. J Virol. 1998;72:7349–7356. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.9.7349-7356.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Park E, Griffin DE. The nsP3 macro domain is important for Sindbis virus replication in neurons and neurovirulence in mice. Virology. 2009;388:305–314. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2009.03.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Park E, Griffin DE. Interaction of Sindbis virus non-structural protein 3 with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 in neuronal cells. J Gen Virol. 2009;90:2073–2080. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.012682-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Snyder JE, Kulcsar KA, Schultz KL, et al. Functional characterization of the alphavirus TF protein. J Virol. 2013;87:8511–8523. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00449-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Binder GK, Griffin DE. Interferon-gamma-mediated site-specific clearance of alphavirus from CNS neurons. Science. 2001;293:303–306. doi: 10.1126/science.1059742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Burdeinick-Kerr R, Wind J, Griffin DE. Synergistic roles of antibody and interferon in noncytolytic clearance of Sindbis virus from different regions of the central nervous system. J Virol. 2007;81:5628–5636. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01152-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Couper KN, Blount DG, Riley EM. IL-10: the master regulator of immunity to infection. J Immunol. 2008;180:5771–5777. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.9.5771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kimura T, Griffin DE. The role of CD8(+) T cells and major histocompatibility complex class I expression in the central nervous system of mice infected with neurovirulent Sindbis virus. J Virol. 2000;74:6117–6125. doi: 10.1128/JVI.74.13.6117-6125.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kimura T, Griffin DE. Extensive immune-mediated hippocampal damage in mice surviving infection with neuroadapted Sindbis virus. Virology. 2003;311:28–39. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6822(03)00110-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rowell JF, Griffin DE. Contribution of T cells to mortality in neurovirulent Sindbis virus encephalomyelitis. J Neuroimmunol. 2002;127:106–114. doi: 10.1016/S0165-5728(02)00108-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Moore KW, de Waal Malefyt R, Coffman RL, O'Garra A. Interleukin-10 and the interleukin-10 receptor. Annu Rev Immunol. 2001;19:683–765. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hedrich CM, Bream JH. Cell type-specific regulation of IL-10 expression in inflammation and disease. Immunol Res. 2010;47:185–206. doi: 10.1007/s12026-009-8150-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kulcsar KA, Baxter VK, Greene IP, Griffin DE. Interleukin 10 modulation of pathogenic Th17 cells during fatal alphavirus encephalomyelitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:16053–16058. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418966111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Steinman L. A brief history of T(H)17, the first major revision in the T(H)1/T(H)2 hypothesis of T cell-mediated tissue damage. Nat Med. 2007;13:139–145. doi: 10.1038/nm1551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Steinman L. Going viral and the fatal vulnerability of neurons from immunity, not from infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:16982–16983. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1420310111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kulcsar KA, Baxter VK, Abraham R, Nelson A, Griffin DE. Distinct immune responses in resistant and susceptible strains of mice during neurovirulent alphavirus encephalomyelitis. J Virol. 2015;89:8280–8291. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00173-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kulcsar KA, Griffin DE. T cell-derived interleukin-10 is an important regulator of the Th17 response during lethal alphavirus encepalomyelitis. J Neuroimmunol 2016. doi:10.1016/jneuroim.2016.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 44.Siffrin V, Radbruch H, Glumm R, et al. In vivo imaging of partially reversible Th17 cell-induced neuronal dysfunction in the course of encephalomyelitis. Immunity. 2010;33:424–436. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wang DD, Zhao YF, Wang GY, et al. IL-17 potentiates neuronal injury induced by oxygen-glucose deprivation and affects neuronal IL-17 receptor expression. J Neuroimmunol. 2009;212:17–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2009.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lee Y, Awasthi A, Yosef N, et al. Induction and molecular signature of pathogenic TH17 cells. Nat Immunol. 2012;13:991–999. doi: 10.1038/ni.2416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Codarri L, Gyulveszi G, Tosevski V, et al. RORgammat drives production of the cytokine GM-CSF in helper T cells, which is essential for the effector phase of autoimmune neuroinflammation. Nat Immunol. 2011;12:560–567. doi: 10.1038/ni.2027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kebir H, Kreymborg K, Ifergan I, et al. Human TH17 lymphocytes promote blood–brain barrier disruption and central nervous system inflammation. Nat Med. 2007;13:1173–1175. doi: 10.1038/nm1651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.McQualter JL, Darwiche R, Ewing C, et al. Granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor: a new putative therapeutic target in multiple sclerosis. J Exp Med. 2001;194:873–882. doi: 10.1084/jem.194.7.873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.El-Behi M, Ciric B, Dai H, et al. The encephalitogenicity of T(H)17 cells is dependent on IL-1- and IL-23-induced production of the cytokine GM-CSF. Nat Immunol. 2011;12:568–575. doi: 10.1038/ni.2031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ponomarev ED, Shriver LP, Maresz K, Pedras-Vasconcelos J, Verthelyi D, Dittel BN. GM-CSF production by autoreactive T cells is required for the activation of microglial cells and the onset of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 2007;178:39–48. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.1.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chen CJ, Ou YC, Chang CY, et al. Glutamate released by Japanese encephalitis virus-infected microglia involves TNF-alpha signaling and contributes to neuronal death. Glia. 2012;60:487–501. doi: 10.1002/glia.22282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Melzer N, Hicking G, Bittner S, et al. Excitotoxic neuronal cell death during an oligodendrocyte-directed CD8+ T cell attack in the CNS gray matter. J Neuroinflam. 2013;10:121. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-10-121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Carmen J, Rothstein JD, Kerr DA. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha modulates glutamate transport in the CNS and is a critical determinant of outcome from viral encephalomyelitis. Brain Res. 2009;1263:143–154. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.01.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Darman J, Backovic S, Dike S, et al. Viral-induced spinal motor neuron death is non-cell-autonomous and involves glutamate excitotoxicity. J Neurosci. 2004;24:7566–7675. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2002-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Nargi-Aizenman JL, Griffin DE. Sindbis virus-induced neuronal death is both necrotic and apoptotic and is ameliorated by N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists. J Virol. 2001;75:7114–7121. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.15.7114-7121.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Nargi-Aizenman JL, Havert MB, Zhang M, Irani DN, Rothstein JD, Griffin DE. Glutamate receptor antagonists protect from virus-induced neural degeneration. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:541–549. doi: 10.1002/ana.20033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Greene IP, Lee EY, Prow N, Ngwang B, Griffin DE. Protection from fatal viral encephalomyelitis: AMPA receptor antagonists have a direct effect on the inflammatory response to infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:3575–3580. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712390105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Thangavelu K, Chong QY, Low BC, Sivaraman J. Structural basis for the active site inhibition mechanism of human kidney-type glutaminase (KGA) Sci Rep. 2014;4:3827. doi: 10.1038/srep03827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Potter MC, Baxter VK, Mathey RW, et al. Neurological sequelae induced by alphavirus infection of the CNS are attenuated by treatment with the glutamine antagonist 6-diazo-5-oxo-l-norleucine. J Neurovirol. 2015;21:159–173. doi: 10.1007/s13365-015-0314-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.