Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1992 Aug 1;89(15):7110–7113. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.15.7110

Relation between the convergence temperatures Th* and Ts* in protein unfolding.

R L Baldwin 1, N Muller 1
PMCID: PMC49655  PMID: 1496007

Abstract

A challenge in understanding the thermodynamics of protein unfolding is to explain the 1979 puzzle posed by Privalov. Why do values of the specific enthalpy and specific entropy of unfolding both converge to common values at approximately the same temperature (Th* approximately equal to Ts*) when extrapolated linearly versus temperature? In 1986, a liquid hydrocarbon model gave an explanation for convergence of the specific entropies at Ts*: it happens because the contribution of the hydrophobic effect to the entropy of unfolding goes to zero at Ts*. The reason for convergence of the specific enthalpies at Th* and for the equality Th* approximately equal to Ts* has remained, however, a matter for speculation; recently, some explanations have been given that are based on models for polar interactions in protein folding. We show here that the relation Th* approximately equal to Ts* can be derived straightforwardly without making any assumptions either about polar interactions or about splitting the hydrophobic interaction into two terms--one for the "hydrophobic hydration" and the other for the residual effect, as suggested recently. Thus, the liquid hydrocarbon model explains both halves of Privalov's puzzle. A similar conclusion has been reached independently by A. Doig and D. H. Williams (personal communication). It has been proposed recently that a correction should be made for the relative sizes of a hydrocarbon solute and water when computing the thermodynamic properties of the hydrophobic interaction from a solvent transfer experiment. This correction affects the temperature at which the entropy of transfer equals zero, and it is important to evaluate its effect on the convergence temperature Ts*. We show that making the size correction does not change the conclusion, reached earlier, that the liquid hydrocarbon model explains the convergence of the specific entropies of protein unfolding.

Full text

PDF
7110

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baldwin R. L. Temperature dependence of the hydrophobic interaction in protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Nov;83(21):8069–8072. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.21.8069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bello J. Tight packing of protein cores and interfaces. Relation to conservative amino acid sequences and stability of protein-protein interaction. Int J Pept Protein Res. 1978 Jul;12(1):38–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chothia C. Hydrophobic bonding and accessible surface area in proteins. Nature. 1974 Mar 22;248(446):338–339. doi: 10.1038/248338a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dill K. A. The meaning of hydrophobicity. Science. 1990 Oct 12;250(4978):297–298. doi: 10.1126/science.2218535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Doig A. J., Williams D. H. Is the hydrophobic effect stabilizing or destabilizing in proteins? The contribution of disulphide bonds to protein stability. J Mol Biol. 1991 Jan 20;217(2):389–398. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90551-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eriksson A. E., Baase W. A., Zhang X. J., Heinz D. W., Blaber M., Baldwin E. P., Matthews B. W. Response of a protein structure to cavity-creating mutations and its relation to the hydrophobic effect. Science. 1992 Jan 10;255(5041):178–183. doi: 10.1126/science.1553543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Herzfeld J. Understanding hydrophobic behavior. Science. 1991 Jul 5;253(5015):88–88. doi: 10.1126/science.253.5015.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Holtzer A. The use of Flory-Huggins theory in interpreting partitioning of solutes between organic liquids and water. Biopolymers. 1992 Jun;32(6):711–715. doi: 10.1002/bip.360320611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. KAUZMANN W. Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation. Adv Protein Chem. 1959;14:1–63. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60608-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lee B. Isoenthalpic and isoentropic temperatures and the thermodynamics of protein denaturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jun 15;88(12):5154–5158. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.12.5154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee B., Richards F. M. The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol. 1971 Feb 14;55(3):379–400. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90324-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lee B. Solvent reorganization contribution to the transfer thermodynamics of small nonpolar molecules. Biopolymers. 1991 Jul;31(8):993–1008. doi: 10.1002/bip.360310809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lee B. The physical origin of the low solubility of nonpolar solutes in water. Biopolymers. 1985 May;24(5):813–823. doi: 10.1002/bip.360240507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Livingstone J. R., Spolar R. S., Record M. T., Jr Contribution to the thermodynamics of protein folding from the reduction in water-accessible nonpolar surface area. Biochemistry. 1991 Apr 30;30(17):4237–4244. doi: 10.1021/bi00231a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Makhatadze G. I., Privalov P. L. Heat capacity of proteins. I. Partial molar heat capacity of individual amino acid residues in aqueous solution: hydration effect. J Mol Biol. 1990 May 20;213(2):375–384. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80197-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Murphy K. P., Gill S. J. Solid model compounds and the thermodynamics of protein unfolding. J Mol Biol. 1991 Dec 5;222(3):699–709. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90506-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Murphy K. P., Privalov P. L., Gill S. J. Common features of protein unfolding and dissolution of hydrophobic compounds. Science. 1990 Feb 2;247(4942):559–561. doi: 10.1126/science.2300815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nicholls A., Sharp K. A., Honig B. Protein folding and association: insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons. Proteins. 1991;11(4):281–296. doi: 10.1002/prot.340110407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nozaki Y., Tanford C. The solubility of amino acids and two glycine peptides in aqueous ethanol and dioxane solutions. Establishment of a hydrophobicity scale. J Biol Chem. 1971 Apr 10;246(7):2211–2217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pohorille A., Pratt L. R. Cavities in molecular liquids and the theory of hydrophobic solubilities. J Am Chem Soc. 1990;112(13):5066–5074. doi: 10.1021/ja00169a011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Privalov P. L., Gill S. J. Stability of protein structure and hydrophobic interaction. Adv Protein Chem. 1988;39:191–234. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60377-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Privalov P. L. Stability of proteins: small globular proteins. Adv Protein Chem. 1979;33:167–241. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60460-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Reynolds J. A., Gilbert D. B., Tanford C. Empirical correlation between hydrophobic free energy and aqueous cavity surface area. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Aug;71(8):2925–2927. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.8.2925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Richards F. M. Areas, volumes, packing and protein structure. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1977;6:151–176. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.06.060177.001055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Roseman M. A. Hydrophilicity of polar amino acid side-chains is markedly reduced by flanking peptide bonds. J Mol Biol. 1988 Apr 5;200(3):513–522. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90540-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sharp K. A., Nicholls A., Fine R. F., Honig B. Reconciling the magnitude of the microscopic and macroscopic hydrophobic effects. Science. 1991 Apr 5;252(5002):106–109. doi: 10.1126/science.2011744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sharp K. A., Nicholls A., Friedman R., Honig B. Extracting hydrophobic free energies from experimental data: relationship to protein folding and theoretical models. Biochemistry. 1991 Oct 8;30(40):9686–9697. doi: 10.1021/bi00104a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Spolar R. S., Livingstone J. R., Record M. T., Jr Use of liquid hydrocarbon and amide transfer data to estimate contributions to thermodynamic functions of protein folding from the removal of nonpolar and polar surface from water. Biochemistry. 1992 Apr 28;31(16):3947–3955. doi: 10.1021/bi00131a009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sturtevant J. M. Heat capacity and entropy changes in processes involving proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Jun;74(6):2236–2240. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.6.2236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES