Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1991 Nov;44(11):946–949. doi: 10.1136/jcp.44.11.946

Assessment of Diesse Ves-matic automated system for measuring erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

M Caswell 1, J Stuart 1
PMCID: PMC496637  PMID: 1752986

Abstract

Measurement of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) using a closed tube system reduces the biohazard risk to laboratory staff. The Diesse Ves-matic system offers manual or vacuum collection of blood into plastic tubes, automated mixing of the sample, and automated reading of the end point after 20 minutes of sedimentation. This system was compared with the 1977 Westergren ESR method of the International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) and with the 1988 ICSH undiluted ESR method. Manually collected Ves-matic samples showed good agreement with ICSH values, although there was a tendency to false low results at low ESR values which may represent dilution of plasma protein with excess citrate. Vacuum collected Ves-matic samples also showed good agreement with ICSH values, although there was a tendency to false high results which may reflect a change in the blood: citrate ratio caused by loss of anticoagulant diluent or vacuum from plastic tubes during storage. The Diesse Ves-matic system incorporates several improvements over previous technology and offers a safer, quicker, and more standardised ESR.

Full text

PDF
946

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bull B. S., Westengard J. C., Farr M., Bacon P. A., Meyer P. J., Stuart J. Efficacy of tests used to monitor rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 1989 Oct 21;2(8669):965–967. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90965-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fernández de Castro M., Fernández Calle P., Viloria A., Larrocha C., Jiménez M. C. Valoración de un sistema alternativo totalmente automatizado para la determinación de la velocidad de sedimentación globular. Sangre (Barc) 1989 Feb;34(1):4–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Haybittle J. L., Hayhoe F. G., Easterling M. J., Jelliffe A. M., Bennett M. H., Vaughan Hudson G., Vaughan Hudson B., MacLennan K. A. Review of British National Lymphoma Investigation studies of Hodgkin's disease and development of prognostic index. Lancet. 1985 Apr 27;1(8435):967–972. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)91736-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Imai K., Suzuki T., Kobayashi M., Yamanaka H., Tomaru Y., Sato J. The significance of erythrocyte sedimentation rate as a prognostic factor for patients with prostate cancer: Gunma Urological Oncology Study Group investigation. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1990 Oct;81(10):971–974. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1990.tb03333.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jou J. M., Insa M. J., Aymerich M., Vives Corrons J. L. Evaluación de un sistema totalmente automático para realizar la velocidad de sedimentación globular. Sangre (Barc) 1988 Dec;33(6):474–478. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Moseley D. L., Bull B. S. A comparison of the Wintrobe, the Westergren and the ZSR erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) methods to a candidate reference method. Clin Lab Haematol. 1982;4(2):169–178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Patton W. N., Meyer P. J., Stuart J. Evaluation of sealed vacuum extraction method (Seditainer) for measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate. J Clin Pathol. 1989 Mar;42(3):313–317. doi: 10.1136/jcp.42.3.313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES