Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2016 Jul 28;4(4):e00753-16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00753-16

Whole-Genome Draft Sequences of Six Commensal Fecal and Six Mastitis-Associated Escherichia coli Strains of Bovine Origin

Andreas Leimbach a,b,c, Anja Poehlein b, Anika Witten d, Olga Wellnitz e, Nahum Shpigel f, Wolfram Petzl g, Holm Zerbe g, Rolf Daniel b, Ulrich Dobrindt a,c,
PMCID: PMC4966475  PMID: 27469942

Abstract

The bovine gastrointestinal tract is a natural reservoir for commensal and pathogenic Escherichia coli strains with the ability to cause mastitis. Here, we report the whole-genome sequences of six E. coli isolates from acute mastitis cases and six E. coli isolates from the feces of udder-healthy cows.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Although bovine intramammary infections with Escherichia coli mostly lead to an acute onset of mastitis, they can also result in a persistent infection of the udder with alternating subclinical or clinical periods (1). Additionally, no common virulence factor subset of mastitis-causing E. coli strains has been identified in previous studies (2).

To investigate the genomic potential of E. coli isolated from bovine mastitis, several draft genomes (35), as well as two complete genomes (6), have been published thus far. However, only two recent genomic E. coli mastitis studies included one commensal bovine isolate (7, 8). Because cows are a natural reservoir not only for pathogenic but also for commensal E. coli of high phylogenetic and genotypic diversity (2), we present here the draft genomes of six E. coli strains isolated from serous udder exudate of mastitis-afflicted cows and six E. coli strains isolated from the feces of udder-healthy cows (Table 1).

TABLE 1 .

Genome features and assembly metrics of the 12 E. coli whole-genome sequences

Strain ECOR phylogroup
(ST)
Source of isolation Genome size (bp) No. of contigs >500 bp N50 (bp) No. of CDSsa Accession no.
131/07 A (ST10) Udder acute mastitis 5,459,392 270 79,414 5,123 JXUH00000000
2772a B1 (ST156) Udder acute mastitis 4,949,901 93 163,837 4,621 LCVG00000000
3234/A A (ST10) Udder acute mastitis 5,482,981 290 95,923 5,211 LCVH00000000
MPEC4839 A (ST10) Udder acute mastitis 4,866,885 124 133,521 4,502 JYHP00000000
MPEC4969 B1 (ST1125) Udder acute mastitis 4,833,611 130 103,834 4,468 JYHQ00000000
RiKo 2299/09 B1 (ST448) Healthy cow feces 4,954,750 129 114,991 4,587 JYKB00000000
RiKo 2305/09 B1 (ST410) Healthy cow feces 4,806,931 123 129,952 4,429 JYPB00000000
RiKo 2308/09 A (ST167) Healthy cow feces 5,112,873 186 83,735 4,685 LCVI00000000
RiKo 2331/09 B1 (ST1614) Healthy cow feces 4,765,494 59 224,192 4,350 LCVJ00000000
RiKo 2340/09 A (ST167) Healthy cow feces 5,024,854 204 82,522 4,568 LAGW00000000
RiKo 2351/09 B1 (ST88) Healthy cow feces 5,297,190 252 102,610 4,931 LAUC00000000
UVM2 A (ST1091) Udder acute mastitis 4,926,170 149 86,033 4,614 LAUD00000000
a

CDS, coding sequence.

All genomes were sequenced with an Illumina HiScan SQ sequencer with Nextera XT chemistry (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) for library preparation and a 101-bp paired-end sequencing run. Raw reads were quality controlled with FastQC version 0.11.2 (http://www.bioinformatics.bbsrc.ac.uk/projects/fastqc). Low-quality reads and adapter contaminations were trimmed with Cutadapt version 1.6 (9). All reads were randomly subsampled to an approximate 70-fold coverage for each strain with seqtk version 1.0-r32 (https://github.com/lh3/seqtk). Subsequently, the reads were de novo assembled with SPAdes version 3.1.1 (10). Assembly statistics were evaluated with QUAST version 2.3 (11), resulting in 59 to 290 contigs >500 bp and genome sizes ranging from 4,765,494 to 5,459,392 bp (Table 1).

The strains were classified evenly into phylogroups A or B1, regardless of isolation source, through the assignment of sequence types (ST) with e. coli_mlst version 0.3 (https://github.com/aleimba/bac-genomics-scripts/tree/master/ecoli_mlst) (12). The most prominent sequence type is ST10, but most of the strains were not closely phylogenetically related.

All genomes were annotated with Prokka version 1.9 (13) with E. coli 1303 (CP009166 to CP009169) or E. coli ECC-1470 (CP010344 to CP010345) as references for annotation for either the ECOR phylogroup A or B1 genomes, respectively. tRNAs were predicted with tRNAscan-SE version 1.3.1 (14). Additionally, the annotations were manually curated with Proteinortho version 5.11 (15), po2anno version 0.2 (https://github.com/aleimba/bac-genomics-scripts/tree/master/po2anno), ACT version 13.0.0 (16), and E. coli strains 1303 and ECC-1470 as references. Finally, tbl2tab version 0.2 (https://github.com/aleimba/bac-genomics-scripts/tree/master/tbl2tab) and Artemis version 16.0.0 (17) were used to refine the annotations after querying the Virulence Factors Database (18) and the ResFinder version 2.1 (19), VirulenceFinder version 1.2 (20), and SerotypeFinder version 1.0 (21) databases. In summary, between 4,350 and 5,211 coding DNA sequences were identified in the genomes with 3 to 7 rRNAs and 68 to 83 tRNAs.

The genome sequences in this study will serve as a useful resource for future comparative studies of E. coli strains associated with bovine mastitis in relationship to commensal strains and for the identification of potential virulence factors.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

These whole-genome shotgun projects have been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession numbers listed in Table 1. The versions described here are the first versions.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We thank David E. Kerr (University of Vermont, Burlington) for providing E. coli mastitis isolate UVM2.

Footnotes

Citation Leimbach A, Poehlein A, Witten A, Wellnitz O, Shpigel N, Petzl W, Zerbe H, Daniel R, Dobrindt U. 2016. Whole-genome draft sequences of six commensal fecal and six mastitis-associated Escherichia coli strains of bovine origin. Genome Announc 4(4):e00753-16. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00753-16.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Zadoks RN, Middleton JR, McDougall S, Katholm J, Schukken YH. 2011. Molecular epidemiology of mastitis pathogens of dairy cattle and comparative relevance to humans. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 16:357–372. doi: 10.1007/s10911-011-9236-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Blum SE, Leitner G. 2013. Genotyping and virulence factors assessment of bovine mastitis Escherichia coli. Vet Microbiol 163:305–312. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.12.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Blum S, Sela N, Heller ED, Sela S, Leitner G. 2012. Genome analysis of bovine-mastitis-associated Escherichia coli O32:H37 strain P4. J Bacteriol 194:3732. doi: 10.1128/JB.00535-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kempf F, Loux V, Germon P. 2015. Genome sequences of two bovine mastitis-causing Escherichia coli strains. Genome Announc 3(2):e00259-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00259-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Richards VP, Lefébure T, Pavinski Bitar PD, Dogan B, Simpson KW, Schukken YH, Stanhope MJ. 2015. Genome based phylogeny and comparative genomic analysis of intra-mammary pathogenic Escherichia coli. PLoS One 10:e0119799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Leimbach A, Poehlein A, Witten A, Scheutz F, Schukken Y, Daniel R, Dobrindt U. 2015. Complete genome sequences of Escherichia coli strains 1303 and ECC-1470 isolated from bovine mastitis. Genome Announc 3(2):e00182-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00182-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Blum SE, Heller ED, Sela S, Elad D, Edery N, Leitner G. 2015. Genomic and phenomic study of mammary pathogenic Escherichia coli. PLoS One 10:e0136387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kempf F, Slugocki C, Blum SE, Leitner G, Germon P. 2016. Genomic comparative study of bovine mastitis Escherichia coli. PLoS One 11:e0147954. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Martin M. 2011. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnetJ 17:10. doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wirth T, Falush D, Lan R, Colles F, Mensa P, Wieler LH, Karch H, Reeves PR, Maiden MC, Ochman H, Achtman M. 2006. Sex and virulence in Escherichia coli: an evolutionary perspective. Mol Microbiol 60:1136–1151. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05172.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 25:955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.0955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lechner M, Findeiss S, Steiner L, Marz M, Stadler PF, Prohaska SJ. 2011. Proteinortho: detection of (co-)orthologs in large-scale analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 12:124. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Carver TJ, Rutherford KM, Berriman M, Rajandream MA, Barrell BG, Parkhill J. 2005. ACT: the Artemis comparison tool. Bioinformatics 21:3422–3423. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rutherford K, Parkhill J, Crook J, Horsnell T, Rice P, Rajandream MA, Barrell B. 2000. Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics 16:944–945. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.10.944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chen L, Xiong Z, Sun L, Yang J, Jin Q. 2012. VFDB 2012 update: toward the genetic diversity and molecular evolution of bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res 40:D641–D645. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, Vestergaard M, Rasmussen S, Lund O, Aarestrup FM, Larsen MV. 2012. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2640–2644. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Joensen KG, Scheutz F, Lund O, Hasman H, Kaas RS, Nielsen EM, Aarestrup FM. 2014. Real-time whole-genome sequencing for routine typing, surveillance, and outbreak detection of verotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol 52:1501–1510. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03617-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Joensen KG, Tetzschner AM, Iguchi A, Aarestrup FM, Scheutz F. 2015. Rapid and easy in silico serotyping of Escherichia coli isolates by use of whole-genome sequencing data. J Clin Microbiol 53:2410–2426 doi: 10.1128/JCM.00008-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES