Abstract
Key points
Cholera causes more than 100,000 deaths each year as a result of severe diarrhoea, vomiting and dehydration due to the actions of cholera toxin; more females than males are affected.
Cholera toxin induces hypersecretion via release of mucosal serotonin and over‐activation of enteric neurons, but its effects on gastrointestinal motility are not well characterized.
We found that cholera toxin rapidly and reversibly reduces colonic motility in female mice in oestrus, but not in males or females in prooestrus, an effect mediated by 5‐HT in the colonic mucosa and by 5‐HT3 receptors.
We show that the number of mucosal enterochromaffin cells containing 5‐HT changes with the oestrous cycle in mice.
These findings indicate that cholera toxin's effects on motility are rapid and depend on the oestrous cycle and therefore can help us better understand differences in responses in males and female patients.
Abstract
Extensive studies of the mechanisms responsible for the hypersecretion produced by cholera toxin (CT) have shown that this toxin produces a massive over‐activation of enteric neural secretomotor circuits. The effects of CT on gastrointestinal motility, however, have not been adequately characterized. We investigated effects of luminal CT on neurally mediated motor activity in ex vivo male and female mouse full length colon preparations. We used video recording and spatiotemporal maps of contractile activity to quantify colonic migrating motor complexes (CMMCs) and resting colonic diameter. We compared effects of CT in female colon from wild‐type and mice lacking tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH1KO). We also compared CMMCs in colons of female mice in oestrus with those in prooestrus. In female (but not male) colon, CT rapidly, reversibly and concentration‐dependently inhibits CMMC frequency and induces a tonic constriction. These effects were blocked by granisetron (5‐HT3 antagonist) and were absent from TPH1KO females. CT effects were prominent at oestrus but absent at prooestrus. The number of EC cells containing immunohistochemically demonstrable serotonin (5‐HT) was 30% greater in female mice during oestrus than during prooestrus or in males. We conclude that CT inhibits CMMCs via release of mucosal 5‐HT, which activates an inhibitory pathway involving 5‐HT3 receptors. This effect is sex‐ and oestrous cycle‐dependent and is probably due to an oestrous cycle‐dependent change in the number of 5‐HT‐containing EC cells in the colonic mucosa.
Key points
Cholera causes more than 100,000 deaths each year as a result of severe diarrhoea, vomiting and dehydration due to the actions of cholera toxin; more females than males are affected.
Cholera toxin induces hypersecretion via release of mucosal serotonin and over‐activation of enteric neurons, but its effects on gastrointestinal motility are not well characterized.
We found that cholera toxin rapidly and reversibly reduces colonic motility in female mice in oestrus, but not in males or females in prooestrus, an effect mediated by 5‐HT in the colonic mucosa and by 5‐HT3 receptors.
We show that the number of mucosal enterochromaffin cells containing 5‐HT changes with the oestrous cycle in mice.
These findings indicate that cholera toxin's effects on motility are rapid and depend on the oestrous cycle and therefore can help us better understand differences in responses in males and female patients.
Abbreviations
- 5‐HT3
serotonin type 3 receptor
- CMMC
colonic migrating motor complex
- CT
cholera toxin
- EC
enterochromaffin
- ENS
enteric nervous system
- GI
gastrointestinal
- KO
knock out
- TPH1
tryptophan hydroxylase
- TTX
tetrodotoxin
- WT
wild‐type
Introduction
Sex based differences in gastrointestinal (GI) disorders are well known and widespread (Palomba et al. 2011). GI complications are often reported to be correlated with fluctuations in sex steroid hormone levels such as pregnancy, menopause and different stages of the menstrual cycle. The prevalence of constipation increases and GI motility decreases during pregnancy (Datta et al. 1974; Wald et al. 1982; Lawson et al. 1985; Truswell, 1985). Nutrient transit is also slower during the luteal phase of the ovarian cycle than during the follicular phase (Wald et al. 1981; Heitkemper & Jarrett, 1992). In addition, more women than men (2:1) are affected by functional bowel disorders (Mathias & Clench, 1998). Indeed, even infectious diseases can show sex‐based differences. For example, a limited number of studies report a higher incidence of cholera in females (Fauveau et al. 1991; Tornheim et al. 2010).
Cholera causes more than 100,000 deaths each year as a result of severe diarrhoea, vomiting and dehydration due to the actions of cholera toxin (CT) (WHO, 2013). CT is an exotoxin produced by the Vibrio cholerae bacterium and induces hypersecretion in the GI tract via activation of the enteric nervous system (ENS) (Cowles & Sarna, 1990 a; Lundgren & Jodal, 1997; Bornstein et al. 2012). Few studies, however, have investigated the effects of CT on GI motility. Historically, in vivo studies in animal models suggest that motility is increased following exposure to CT (Finkelstein et al. 1964; Banwell & Sherr, 1973; Cowles & Sarna, 1990 b). Juvenile rabbits infected with cholera show increased GI transit (Finkelstein et al. 1964). Similarly, increased migrating action potential complexes following administration of CT in anaesthetized rabbits has also been reported (Banwell & Sherr, 1973). In contrast, exposure to CT reduced propagating contractions in the small intestine after a meal in conscious dogs (Cowles & Sarna, 1990 b); nevertheless, no change was observed in GI transit times in patients with cholera (Banwell et al. 1970) and there is little data relating to whether increases in motility induced by CT are secondary to secretion changes.
Kordasti et al. (2006) and Fung et al. (2010) assessed CT‐induced changes in small intestinal motility in animal models in vivo and in vitro, respectively. Both reported that CT increases small intestinal motility with the in vitro effects being very rapid, within the first 15 min of exposure, but the time course of onset of changes in vivo was not assessed. Interestingly, this effect was further increased in each case by blocking 5‐HT3 receptors. Another potential site of impact of CT is the colon, which is a major site of fluid reabsorption (Bornstein et al. 2012), a process that depends on the rate of transit of faecal matter; however, whether CT has a direct effect on colonic motility in vitro has not been assessed.
We investigated the effects of CT on colonic migrating motor complexes in isolated colon of female and male mice to determine whether effects are sex‐specific and whether mucosal 5‐HT plays a role in mediating the effects of CT.
Methods
Ethical approval and animals
Mice were killed by cervical dislocation; this and other procedures were approved by the University of Melbourne Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee (approval no: 1011897) according to guidelines of the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. The investigators understand the ethical principles under which The Journal operates and confirm that this work complies with this animal ethics checklist. Mice were obtained from the Animal Resources Centre, Canning Vale, WA, Australia) and maintained on‐site by the Biological Research facility in the Departments of Physiology and Pharmacology at The University of Melbourne. Mice were housed in individually ventilated cages. They were given water and fed sterilized Walter and Eliza Hall Institute mouse breeder cubes ad libitum along with sunflower seeds once weekly to supplement their diet. Adult mice female or male (C57Bl/6, > 22 g, 8–10 weeks old) were used.
Vaginal smears
Female mice were maintained under a light–dark cycle of 06.00 h to 18.00 h. Vaginal smears were performed between 08.00 h and 09.00 h. Determination of the stage in the oestrous cycle was carried out as previously reported (Tran et al. 2012). Briefly, a blunted sterile Pasteur pipette filled with approximately 50 μl of sterile distilled water was inserted into the vaginal canal and the contents were slowly flushed back into the pipette. The contents were then transferred to glass microscope slides (Livingstone International Pty Ltd, Rosebery, NSW, Australia), air dried and stained (Shandon Wright‐Giemsa Stain Kit, Thermo Scientific, Australia). The cytology of smear samples was examined using a light microscope to determine the stage of the oestrous cycle for each animal. Prooestrus smears contained large numbers of nucleated epithelial cells while oestrus smears predominantly contained cornified, non‐nucleated epithelial cells.
Plasma oestrogen measurement
Following cervical dislocation, blood samples were obtained by cardiac puncture and centrifuged for 15 min at 10,000g in order to separate plasma. Plasma samples were stored at −80°C and oestrogen concentrations were measured using an ELISA assay kit (Estradiol EIA Kit, Cayman Chemical Co., Ann Arbor, MI, USA) as per Tran et al. (2012).
Tissue preparation (motility)
Whole colon was removed from freshly killed mice and placed in an organ bath containing 15 ml of warmed (36°C) physiological saline solution (composition, mm: NaCl 118, KCl 4.6, NaH2PO4 1, NaHCO3 25, MgSO4 1.2, d‐glucose 11, CaCl2 2.5; bubbled with 95% O2–5% CO2). Physiological saline was continuously superfused through the organ bath at a flow rate of approximately 6 ml min−1. Segments were connected to an adjustable pressure head via oral and anal cannulas, as previously described (Gwynne et al. 2004; Roberts et al. 2007). The oral end of the tissue was connected to a reservoir of physiological saline, the anal end to an outflow tube that provided a back‐pressure of 3–4 cmH2O.
Video imaging of colonic motor patterns
Video imaging analysis of colonic motility was conducted as described in (Roberts et al. 2007; Swaminathan et al. 2016). Briefly, colonic motility was recorded in vitro using a Logitech camera (QuickCam Pro 4000; I‐Tech, Ultimo, NSW, Australia) mounted directly above the organ bath. In‐house software (Scribble 2.0) and a purpose‐built Matlab (2013b) plugin, Analyse 2.0, were used to convert recorded video segments (15 min duration) to spatiotemporal maps where the diameter of the colon is mapped (as a heat map) along the length of the segment as a function of time. The x‐axes of the spatiotemporal maps represent increasing time, with length of colonic segment along the y‐axes. The diameter along the colon is colour‐coded, such that blue–green pixels indicate relaxed tissue and yellow–red pixels identify constricted regions (Fig. 1).
Figure 1. Representative spatiotemporal maps showing CMMCs (arrows) in randomly selected females .

A, control (a), CT (1.25 μg ml−1) (b) and washout (c). B, number of CMMCs per 15 min recording (mean of four recordings over a 1 h time period) vs. control, CT exposure and washout periods (horizontal scale bar 5 mm, vertical scale bar 60 s). C, CT inhibits CMMCs in a concentration‐dependent manner (CT concentrations: 0.125, 1.25 and 12.5 μg ml−1). D and E, CT exerts a rapid effect on CMMC frequency (D) and resting diameter in the colon (E) of randomly selected female C57Bl/6 mice. Time control data show no significant difference in CMMC frequency or colonic diameter (D). F, resting colonic diameter was taken from a plot of the diameter (Fb) of the colon at a consistent point 66% along the length of the colon in each map (Fa). *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, in D and E: P value is for comparison of CT vs. time control over the entire curve.
Two indices of neurally mediated colonic motor activity were analysed: colonic migrating motor complexes (CMMCs) defined as spontaneous constrictions originating at the oral end of the colon that propagate more than half of the length of the tissue, and the resting colonic diameter (diameter of the colon between CMMCs when the colon is quiescent).
CMMC frequency, the speed of CMMC propagation and resting gut diameter were measured using Analyse2 software as previously reported (Gwynne et al. 2004). Briefly, CMMC frequency was manually counted from spatiotemporal maps. Resting colonic diameter, an index of compliance when luminal pressure is constant, was estimated as the mean diameter between contractions measured at a point lying 66% of the colonic length from the oral end of the preparation (Fig. 1 Fa‐b). This location was chosen to give a constant reference point for comparison between preparations. The speed of CMMC propagation was calculated by measuring the slopes of individual CMMCs on the spatiotemporal maps.
Experimental protocol for motility studies
After a 30 min equilibration period, a 1 h control period (four × 15 min videos) was recorded. In specific experiments, CT was applied to the lumen by itself or together with tetrodotoxin (TTX) (bath) or granisetron (lumen or bath application). In other experiments, TTX (bath) or granisetron (lumen or bath) was added on its own. In each experiment, tissue was exposed to drugs/toxin for 1 h. Drugs/toxin were then washed out during the following hour using physiological saline. CT (0.125, 1.25 and 12.5 μg ml−1; Sigma‐Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) was applied to the lumen of the colonic preparation via the oral cannula. The 5‐HT3 receptor antagonist, granisetron (1 μm, gift from SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA, USA), was applied to the lumen or added to the reservoir from which the superfusate for the organ bath containing the tissue was drawn in different experiments. TTX (1 μm, Alomone, Jerusalem, Israel) was added to the organ bath. Each tissue preparation served as its own control prior to drug/toxin application. The effect of luminal application of physiological saline alone was studied in ‘time control’ experiments.
Comparisons of the effects of drugs and toxins were made using data obtained from the last three 15 min duration maps (45 min in total) prior to changes in solutions for each condition to avoid wash‐in effects of changes to either the bathing or luminal solutions. To assess the timing of onset of CT effects during oestrus and prooestrus, CMMCs were compared over the final 15 min map for control and the first 15 min in the presence of CT.
Immunohistochemistry
Tissue from the mid colon region (immediately anal to the mucosal striations of the proximal colon) from oestrus, prooestrus and male mice was dissected from freshly killed mice, cleared of luminal content, and fixed in 4% formaldehyde (from paraformaldehyde) for 80 min at room temperature. Tissues were cleared of fixative (3 × 10 min phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS) washes) before cryoprotecting in 30% sucrose in PBS overnight at 4°C. Tissues were then mounted in cryo‐moulds, with Tissue‐Tek optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound (ProSciTech, Kirwan, Queensland, Australia) medium and snap‐frozen in liquid nitrogen. Tissue was then cut in sections of 18 μm thickness using a Cyostat (Microm HM 525, Fronine Laboratory Supplies, Riverstone, NSW, Australia). Sections were placed on Super Frost PLus slides (Menzel‐Glaser, Gerhard Menzel GmbH, Saarbrückener, Braunschweig, Germany) and air dried for 10–15 min before permeabilizing with 0.1% Triton X‐100 (ProSciTech, Thuringowa, Queensland, Australia) together with 10% Casblock (Zymed, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 30 min. Sections were then incubated with primary antisera against the pan‐neuronal marker Hu (ANNA‐1, 1:10,000, a gift from Dr Lennon, USA; Hotta et al. 2013; Fung et al. 2014) and 5‐HT (goat anti‐5‐HT, 1:400, no. 20079 Immunostar, Hudson, WI, USA) overnight at 4°C. After being washed (3 × 10 min; PBS), preparations were incubated in secondary antisera, donkey anti‐human Alexa Fluor 594 (1: 750; Jackson ImmunoResearch Inc., West Grove, PA, USA) and donkey anti‐sheep Alexa Fluor 488 (1:400; Molecular Probes no. A11615) for 150 min at room temperature. The preparations were washed again (3 × 10 min; PBS) before mounting in Dakocytomation fluorescent mounting medium (Dako, Carpenteria, CA, USA). Images were captured using a confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM510 fluorescence microscope; Zeiss, Gladesville, NSW, Australia) and Zeiss LSM software, (version 4.2.0.121). Digital images for 5‐HT labelling were quantitatively analysed using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Statistical analysis
Data were analysed by two‐way ANOVA or Student's t test as appropriate. n is the number of animals from which measures were taken, and statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
Results
Cholera toxin (CT) depresses colonic motility in female mice during oestrus
CT, added to the lumen, reduced CMMC frequency in a dose‐dependent manner in randomly selected females (Fig. 1 A, B and D). Within 15 min of CT application, CMMC frequency was reduced compared with the control period at all concentrations of the toxin. CT at 0.125 μg ml−1 caused a 40% reduction in CMMCs. CT at 1.25 μg ml−1 rapidly reduced CMMC frequency by 65% compared with the control period. Administration of 12.5 μg ml−1 CT further depressed CMMC frequency by 84% (descriptive statistics are provided in Table 1). Despite the effect of CT on CMMC frequency, the speed of propagation of the CMCCs was unaffected by luminal CT (Fig. 1 C and Table 2; P > 0.05, 2‐way ANOVA). No change in CMMC frequency was observed under baseline conditions (i.e. in time control experiments; Fig. 1 B). Application of 1.25 μg ml−1 CT resulted in robust effects in female colon (Fig. 1 D) and this concentration was therefore used in subsequent studies.
Table 1.
Descriptive statistics describing the number of CMMCs and normalized resting colonic diameter Data are mean ± SEM
| CMMCs number/15 min | Normalized colonic diameter | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment | Control | Treatment | P | Control | Treatment | P | n |
| Time control | 7 ± 1 | 7 ± 1 | 0.336 | 1.07 ± 0.04 | 1.05 ± 0.03 | 0.818 | 6 |
| CT (0.125 μg ml−1) | 5 ± 0.4 | 3 ± 0.8 | 0.04 | 0.97 ± 0.02 | 0.73 ± 0.01 | <0.0001 | 5 |
| CT (1.25 μg ml−1) | 8 ± 1 | 3 ± 1 | <0.0001 | 0.98 ± 0.01 | 0.75 ± 0.02 | <0.0001 | 12 |
| CT (12.5 μg ml−1) | 7 ± 0.6 | 1 ± 0.5 | <0.0001 | 0.96 ± 0.03 | 0.63 ± 0.02 | <0.0001 | 6 |
| TTX | 7 ± 0.2 | 0 | <0.0001 | 0.96 ± 0.03 | 0.75 ± 0.02 | 0.001 | 5 |
| TTX + CT | 7 ± 2.4 | 0 | <0.0001 | 1.1 ± 0.04 | 0.8 ± 0.07 | 0.016 | 5 |
| Male + CT (1.25 μg ml−1) | 7 ± 0.7 | 6 ± 0.7 | 0.31 | 1.27 ± 0.09 | 1.24 ± 0.09 | 0.85 | 7 |
| Male + CT (12.5 μg ml−1) | 8 ± 0.2 | 5 ± 03 | 0.000 | 1.01 ± 0.01 | 0.98 ± 0.02 | 0.206 | 6 |
| GR in bath | 7 ± 0.9 | 8 ± 1.1 | 0.38 | 1.00 ± 0.01 | 0.99 ± 0.01 | 0.133 | 8 |
| GR in lumen | 6 ± 0.7 | 5 ± 0.4 | 0.014 | 0.98 ± 0.01 | 0.96 ± 0.01 | 0.117 | 10 |
| CT + GR bath | 8 ± 0.6 | 6 ± 1.1 | 0.21 | 1.00 ± 0.01 | 0.99 ± 0.01 | 0.062 | 6 |
| CT + GR lumen | 7 ± 0.7 | 6 ± 0.6 | 0.24 | 1.00 ± 0.01 | 0.96 ± 0.01 | 0.058 | 6 |
| WT + CT | 8 ± 0.5 | 3 ± 0.5 | 0.001 | 0.82 ± 0.06 | 0.52 ± 0.03 | 0.011 | 5 |
| TPH1KO + CT | 5 ± 0.5 | 5 ± 0.4 | 0.87 | 0.91 ± 0.03 | 0.80 ± 0.05 | 0.127 | 6 |
| Oestrus + CT | 5 ± 0.8 | 1 ± 0.5 | 0.003 | 0.91 ± 0.04 | 0.7 ± 0.02 | 0.004 | 6 |
| Prooestrus + CT | 8 ± 1.2 | 7 ± 1.0 | 1.00 | 0.93 ± 0.03 | 0.89 ± 0.04 | 0.534 | 6 |
Table 2.
Propagation speed of CMMCs in colons from randomly selected (i.e. chosen without regard for stage of oestrous cycle) female mice Data are mean ± SEM
| Propagation speed (mm s−1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CT concentration | 0–60 | 60–120 | 120–180 |
| (μg ml−1) | (control) | (CT/saline) | (Washout) |
| 12.5 | 2.0 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 1.9 ± 0.3 |
| 1.25 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 1.5 ± 0.2 |
| 0.125 | 1.5 ± 0.01 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.7 ± 0.2 |
| Control | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.3 |
CT constricted the colon in a concentration‐dependent manner in female mice (Fig. 1 E and Table 1). In control solutions, the mean colonic diameter between CMMC contractions ranged from 4.3 ± 0.02 to 4.8 ± 0.15 mm in different experimental series (all estimates from 5–12 preparations). For ease of comparison, all diameter measurements in individual maps were normalized by dividing the measurement for that map by the value measured for the first control map taken from that preparation. Colonic diameter was reduced within 15 min of exposure to CT at all concentrations used, with 12.5 μg ml−1 producing the largest constriction. Application of 1.25 μg ml−1 CT caused a 30% reduction in colonic diameter (Table 1). Both the reduction in CMMC frequency and the tonic constriction were reversed during washout of CT (Fig. 1).
To assess the neural contribution to the effects of CT, tetrodotoxin (1 μm; TTX) was added to the bath. This abolished CMMCs in randomly selected female mice (Fig. 2 A). CMMCs were similarly absent in the presence of TTX and CT (Table 1). TTX caused a colonic constriction (Fida et al. 1997) indistinguishable from the constriction induced by CT (1.25 μg ml−1, Fig. 2 B and Table 1). Addition of TTX together with CT produced no further constriction of the colon (Fig. 2 and Table 1) suggesting that the constriction produced by CT depends on neural activity.
Figure 2. TTX abolishes CMMCs and constricts the colon of randomly selected females .

Aa–c, spatiotemporal maps showing effects of TTX (1 μm) on CMMCs (Ab) and the beginnings of reversal of the TTX‐induced abolition (Ac). Aa shows control CMMCs in this preparation. TTX abolished CMMCs (horizontal scale bar 60 s, vertical scale bar 5 mm). B, box plots showing normalized colonic diameter for preparations treated with CT (1.25 μg ml−1) (red), 1 μm TTX (blue) and TTX plus 1.25 μg ml−1 CT (grey). CT, TTX and TTX plus CT all constricted the colon during the exposure period (drug), but their effects were indistinguishable.
Cholera toxin does not alter CMMC frequency or colonic diameter in male mouse colon
There were no significance differences in either CMMC frequency or colonic diameter between male (4.8 ± 0.04 mm, n = 7) and female (4.4 ± 0.1 mm, n = 12) colon under control conditions. Luminal CT (1.25 μg ml−1) did not alter CMMC frequency in male C57Bl/6 colon preparations nor did it change resting diameter (Fig. 3 and Table 1). At a higher concentration (12.5 μg ml−1) CT caused a small reduction in CMMC frequency (37%, Table 1), but did not affect colonic diameter.
Figure 3. CT (1.25 μg ml−1) does not alter CMMC frequency or resting colonic diameter in male mice .

A, representative spatiotemporal maps showing CMMC frequency during control, luminal CT (1.25 μg ml−1) exposure and washout conditions (horizontal scale bar 60 s, vertical scale bar 5 mm). CT application did not alter CMMC frequency (B) or colonic resting gut width (C) in male colon. Time controls (motility in the absence of CT) showed no change in CMMC frequency or resting gut width over the 3 h recording period (B and C).
Blockade of 5‐HT3 receptors abolishes the effect of luminal CT in female mouse colon
The hypersecretion evoked by CT is depressed or abolished by blockade of 5‐HT3 receptors with antagonists like granisetron, while this antagonist enhances the increased motility in the small intestine produced by luminal CT (Kordasti et al. 2006; Fung et al. 2010). Accordingly we investigated the role of 5‐HT3 receptors in the actions of CT on CMMCs and colonic diameter by adding granisetron (1 μm) either to the bathing solution or together with CT to the lumen.
Granisetron, whether luminal or bath applied, blocked the CT‐induced reductions in CMMCs and resting colonic diameter in female colon (Fig. 4 and Table 1). This suggests that 5‐HT plays a key role in the actions of CT that suppress CMMCs and also that constrict the colon. In the absence of CT, luminal granisetron produced a small reduction in CMMC frequency (Fig. 4 and Table 1), but bath application of granisetron alone did not alter CMMC frequency from control values (Fig. 4 and Table 1). Neither route of administration altered colonic diameter in the absence of luminal CT.
Figure 4. Granisetron (5‐HT3 antagonist) blocks the CT‐induced reduction in CMMCs in C57BL/6 female mouse colon .

A, bath application of granisetron (GR) did not affect the number of CMMCs (box plots) compared with control, while luminal application of GR reduced the number of CMMCs compared with control period (P = 0.028). B, both luminal and bath application of GR prevented the reduction in the number of CMMCs (box plots) induced by CT on C57BL/6 female mouse colon (i.e. no change from time control, P > 0.05 – control/CT+GR) (horizontal scale bar 60 s, vertical scale bar 5 mm).
CT inhibits colonic motility in female mice via release of mucosal 5‐HT
There are two possible sources of the 5‐HT involved in CT‐induced motility effects; mucosal EC cells and a subset of myenteric neurons each synthesize this monoamine. To test the idea that EC cells provide the 5‐HT, we measured CMMC frequency and colonic diameter in female transgenic tph1 knockout (TPH1KO) mice. Tryptophan hydroxylase 1 (TPH1) is the rate‐limiting enzyme regulating the synthesis of 5‐HT in EC cells. Because TPH2 is rate limiting in central and enteric serotonergic neurons (Walther et al. 2003), TPH1KO mice selectively lack the ability to produce mucosal 5‐HT (Li et al. 2011; Heredia et al. 2013). The frequency of CMMCs under control conditions in female TPH1KO mice was lower than that in their WT female littermates (Fig. 5 C and Table 1), a result similar to data on male TPH1KO mice reported by Heredia et al. (2013). Importantly, in female mice, CT (1.25 mg ml−1) significantly reduced the number of CMMCs in WT animals (Table 1 and Fig. 5 A and C), but had no effect on randomly selected TPH1KO colon (Table 1 and Fig. 5 B and C).
Figure 5. CT inhibits colonic motility in female mice via mucosal 5‐HT .

A and B, spatiotemporal maps showing normal CMMCs during the control period in WT littermate (A) and TPH1KO females (B); CT (1.25 μg ml−1) reduced the CMMC frequency and the resting gut width in wild‐type littermates while having no effect on TPH1KO female mice (horizontal scale 60 s, vertical scale bar 5 mm). C, box plots comparing numbers of CMMCs in time control (white), WT (pink) and TPH1KO (pale blue) in control, with CT in lumen and after CT washout (*P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001). D, box plots comparing normalize colonic diameter for same groups of preparations.
CT strongly reduced the diameter of the colons of WT female mice (Table 1 and Fig. 5 A and D), but had no significant effect on the diameter of the colons of TPH1KO female mice (Table 1 and Fig. 5 B and D). These observations support the idea that CT induces 5‐HT secretion from EC cells to constrict the colon and inhibit CMMCs.
The effects of luminal CT depend on the oestrous cycle in female mice
In female mice, oestrogen levels fluctuate over the 4‐day oestrous cycle from a high plasma oestrogen stage (prooestrus) to a low oestrogen stage (oestrus). To examine whether the motility effects of CT in female mice are dependent upon the oestrous cycle, prooestrus and oestrus mice were selected by vaginal cytology screening and the stage of the oestrous cycle was further confirmed by measuring plasma oestrogen levels in a subset (n = 12) of the mice. As expected, all plasma samples assayed from mice with the cytological characteristics of the oestrus stage had lower oestrogen levels than samples from mice in prooestrus (mean plasma oestrogen concentration during oestrus was 28.5 ± 2.4 pg ml−1, n = 6; during prooestrus it was 61.6 ± 1.8 pg ml−1, n = 6; P = 0.001).
Changes in motility in oestrus and prooestrus females in the presence of CT (1.25 μg ml−1) were investigated. CT reduced CMMC frequency in oestrus females by 60% over that of the control period. In contrast, CT had no effect on CMMC frequency in prooestrus females (Fig. 6 A and B and Table 1). In addition, CT (1.25 μg ml−1) reduced the resting colonic diameter in oestrus females, but not the diameter of the prooestrus colon (Fig. 6 D and Table 1).
Figure 6. Effect of CT (1.25 μg ml−1) in prooestrus and oestrus females .

Spatiotemporal maps showing motility in oestrus (A) and prooestrus (B) females during exposure and washout of 1.25 μg ml−1 of CT (horizontal scale bar 60 s, vertical scale bar 5 mm). C, box plots of numbers of CMMCs in 15 min maps showing that CT significantly reduced the number of CMMCs in oestrus female mice (P < 0.001), but had no significant effect on CMMC frequency in prooestrus females (P > 0.05). D, box plots showing that luminal application of CT significantly reduced resting colonic diameter in oestrus females (**P < 0.01), but not in prooestrus females (P > 0.05).
Mucosal 5‐HT depends on the oestrous cycle
Our data show that the ability of CT to inhibit CMMC frequency and constrict the colon in female mice is restricted to the oestrus period. This result might be due to oestrus‐related changes within the enteric neural circuitry that alter the efficacy of 5‐HT‐activated neural pathways or, more simply, due to a change in the mucosal level of 5‐HT. We tested this second possibility by comparing the numbers of 5‐HT‐immunoreactive cells in the mucosal layer of transverse sections of colons from female mice in oestrus or prooestrus and from male mice. Two clearly distinct classes of immunoreactive cells were identified. One class was confined to the epithelial cell layer of the mucosa and had the typical morphologies of enterochromaffin (EC) cells including, in many cases, long ‘axon’‐like processes (Fig. 7 A) (Cremon et al. 2011) that were similar to the ‘neuropods’ of enteroendocrine cells (Bohórquez et al. 2015). The other class was found in the lamina propria and were probably mast cells (Mawe & Hoffman, 2013).
Figure 7. Expression of 5‐HT in EC cells in the mucosal epithelium differs between oestrus, prooestrus and male mid colon .

A–D, cross sections of the mid colon showing 5‐HT immunoreactivity in EC cells and cells in the lamina propria of the mucosa from an oestrus female (B), a prooestrus female (C) and a male (D) mouse. A shows the different morphologies of EC cells including the axon‐like neuropods. E, mean EC cell count per millimetre of mucosal epithelium showing oestrus female colon had significantly more 5‐HT‐immunoreactive EC cells (35 ± 3) than prooestrus females (27 ± 1) or males (26 ± 2). Data are mean ± SEM, P = 0.0138 and n = 5 for each. Scale bars for Aa–c and B–D, 20 μm and 60 μm, respectively.
During oestrus there were significantly greater numbers of each class of 5‐HT‐immunoreactive cells than during prooestrus, or in males (Fig. 7). The number of EC cells per millimetre of epithelium in oestrus female colon was 35 ± 3, but was 27 ± 1 at prooestrus and 26 ± 2 in male colon (P < 0.05 in each case).
Discussion
The data presented here indicate that there are substantial differences between female and male mice in the effects of luminal CT on neurally regulated contractile activity of the isolated colon. These differences depend on mucosal 5‐HT, presumably acting via 5‐HT3 receptors, and on the oestrous cycle, disappearing at prooestrus. Mucosal 5‐HT‐containing EC cells also vary with the oestrous cycle with substantially more being present in the colonic mucosa of females at oestrus than in the mucosa of females at prooestrus or in the colonic mucosa of males. The sexually dimorphic actions of CT, therefore, may result from greater release of mucosal 5‐HT in females (except during prooestrus) than in males.
Luminal CT rapidly and reversibly reduces spontaneous neurogenic contractile activity in female mouse colon. Infusion of CT into the lumen of the colon from randomly selected female mice or from female mice at oestrus reduced CMMC frequency within the first 15 min of exposure. In most cases, a substantial tonic constriction was seen within 200 s of exposure indicating that the effects of CT on colonic motility were much more rapid in these animals than hypersecretory effects that have been reported in many previous studies. Hypersecretion is seen after 90–120 min of incubation with CT and persists for several hours after the toxin is flushed from the lumen (Field et al. 1972; Argenzio & Whipp, 1981; Turvill et al. 1999; Banks et al. 2005; Kordasti et al. 2006). Both effects of CT on contractility were reversible within an hour when the toxin was flushed from the colonic lumen. As both the prolonged hypersecretion and the relatively rapid motility effects described here are mediated by mucosal 5‐HT (see below) acting on enteric neural circuits, the reasons for the different time courses of the two effects are unclear and need further investigation.
A further difference from earlier in vivo studies is that both inhibition of CMMC generation and the tonic constriction were seen with as little as 0.125 μg ml−1, while studies of CT‐induced secretion have used much larger concentrations (e.g. 40 μg ml−1, Kordasti et al. 2006; 12.5 μg ml−1, Turvill et al. 1999; 25 μg ml−1, Banks et al. 2005). Interestingly, a previous study reporting rapid effects of CT on motility also found effects at 1.25 μg ml−1 toxin (Fung et al. 2010). A small effect on CMMC frequency was observed in male colon at 12.5 μg ml−1, which is comparable to the concentrations used in previous studies of secretion. As such studies are often confined to males, our results suggest that an analysis of CT‐induced hypersecretion in females may be rewarding.
Blocking neural activity with TTX, which blocks most voltage‐dependent sodium channels, abolished the CMMCs as expected and produced a tonic constriction of the colon that was indistinguishable from that produced by CT. When TTX and CT were administered together the constriction produced was not increased over levels due to either toxin alone. This was despite our observation of infrequent CMMCs in CT‐constricted colon indicating that the tonic constriction is not maximal. These data indicate that the tonic constriction produced by luminal CT depends on neural activity.
Our data show that effects of CT on colonic contractile activity are sexually dimorphic and depend on the oestrous cycle in female mice. Although low concentrations of CT produced both reduced CMMC activity and a tonic constriction of colon from randomly selected females, no effect of the toxin was seen in males until we used two orders of magnitude more toxin (12.5 μg ml−1). At this high concentration, there was a 35% reduction in CMMC frequency (note, the reduction in females at 12.5 μg ml−1 was 86%, while at 0.125 μg ml−1 it was 40%) and no tonic constriction was detected. To test whether this difference between the sexes might be due to circulating sex steroids, we assessed the effects of CT (1.25 μg ml−1) on colon taken from female mice in oestrus and compared these with the effects on colon taken from mice at prooestrus. We confirmed these phases both via vaginal smears and measurement of plasma oestradiol levels. There was a striking difference between the two phases with oestrus colon showing reduced CMMC frequency and tonic constriction with CT in the lumen, a treatment that was completely ineffective in prooestrus colon. Indeed, the behaviour of prooestrus colon was indistinguishable from male colon.
Three lines of evidence support the conclusion that the effects of CT on contractile activity in female colon depend on mucosal 5‐HT and 5‐HT3 receptors. The strongest evidence comes from analysis of female TPH1KO mice; TPH1 is the rate‐limiting enzyme for biosynthesis of 5‐HT in EC cells (Walther et al. 2003; Li et al. 2011; Margolis et al. 2014). In these mice, CMMC frequency under control conditions was significantly lower than in the colons of their wild‐type (WT) littermates, as has also been reported for male TPH1KO mice (Heredia et al. 2013). Importantly, CT in the lumen of colon from TPH1KO females and selected without consideration of the oestrous cycle had no effect on either CMMC frequency or resting colonic diameter. This stands in marked contrast to the effects of CT in their WT female littermates. These data strongly suggest that EC cell 5‐HT regulates CMMC frequency. When mucosally released 5‐HT is not excessive, it enhances CMMC frequency. Very high levels of released 5‐HT, such as those seen in female mice during oestrus, inhibit CMMC initiation, but not their propagation once initiated (see Table 2 and Figs 1 and 5).
The second line of evidence is that blockade of 5‐HT3 receptors abolished the effects of CT in females selected without regard to the oestrous cycle. This result obtained no matter whether the antagonist, granisetron, was added to the organ bath or delivered simultaneously with CT in the lumen. Luminal granisetron produced a small, but significant, reduction in CMMC frequency in the absence of CT (suggesting that 5‐HT3 receptors participate in EC cell‐driven CMMC initiation), but abolished the effects of CT. Taken together, these data suggest that there are two distinct 5‐HT3 receptor‐mediated pathways that are activated by mucosal 5‐HT: a pathway that enhances CMMC generation with low (perhaps physiological) levels of tonic 5‐HT release and an inhibitory pathway activated when 5‐HT release is excessive, as it is in oestrus females provoked by CT. Interestingly, 5‐HT3 receptors also appear to mediate the tonic constriction that is produced by CT‐induced mucosal 5‐HT release, which could either be due to inhibition of tonic firing of inhibitory motor neurons or increased tonic firing of excitatory motor neurons. In either case, this effect appears to be distinct from the effects of CT on CMMC generation, because CMMCs can be seen superimposed on the tonic constriction (Fig. 1).
The third line of evidence is our observation that the number of 5‐HT‐containing cells in the mucosa of female mouse colon is lower at prooestrus, when CT has no effect on contractile activity, than at oestrus. Together with the TPH1 knockout data and the effects of granisetron, both in randomly selected females, this suggests that the probability that CT will inhibit CMMC generation depends on the amount of 5‐HT available to be released by the toxin. Our observation of a small effect of CT at 12.5 μg ml−1 on CMMCs in males is consistent with this conclusion and suggests that a higher concentration of toxin may compensate for the lower number of EC cells in male mice. A corollary of this is that EC cell numbers would be expected to be higher in females than in males, except at prooestrus, because random selection would sample equal numbers of oestrus, metoestrus, dioestrus and prooestrus females. This, in turn, implies that the lower number of EC cells at prooestrus is due to an active process, perhaps reflecting high oestrogen levels, as activation of oestrogen receptor β enhances apoptosis of mucosal epithelial cells and reduces their proliferation (Wada‐Hiraiki et al. 2006). These changes parallel other changes in the mucosal epithelium during the oestrous cycle including alterations in potassium channel expression (Alzamora et al. 2011) and colonic permeability via altered expression of occludin and junctional adhesion molecule‐A (Braniste et al. 2009).
Our results show that mucosal 5‐HT plays a role in the initiation of CMMCs in female mice, because CMMC frequency is lower in female TPH1KO females and in female WT colon when granisetron is in the lumen. The data also indicate, however, that CMMCs can be initiated in the absence of mucosal 5‐HT, because CMMCs are still seen in the colons of female TPH1‐knockout mice. Heredia et al. (2013) observed CMMCs in male TPH1KO mice; however, the properties of these CMMCs differed from those in the colons of WT males. This present study did not explore the mechanisms that initiate CMMCs or colonic propulsion, which have been the subject of debate in The Journal of Physiology’s CrossTalk series (Smith & Gershon, 2015; Spencer et al. 2015). Nevertheless, the most likely explanation for our observations is that low levels of 5‐HT released from the mucosa act via 5‐HT3 receptors to facilitate generation of CMMCs, perhaps resulting from distension produced at the oral cannula or pressure on EC cells.
The effects of CT that we have identified suggest that the role of mucosal 5‐HT in females is much more complex than simply enhancing or initiating CMMCs and related propulsive motility patterns. CT produces a massive release of 5‐HT from the mucosa (Farthing, 2002; Lundgren, 2002) and our findings indicate that this 5‐HT acts via 5‐HT3 receptors to suppress or obscure CMMCs, rather than to enhance them. A similar mechanism may also operate in the guinea‐pig jejunum, where CT produces a rapid increase in propulsive activity that is enhanced by blockade of 5‐HT3 receptors (Fung et al. 2010), and rat jejunum where increased contractile activity resulting from CT treatment is enhanced by granisetron, in vivo (Kordasti et al. 2006). This suggests that physiological levels of 5‐HT release enhance motility via one neural pathway, while pathophysiological levels of 5‐HT suppress motility possibly by over‐activating at least one other pathway, in effect a neural spasm, which interferes with the coordinated neural activity required to produce a CMMC. Notably, high levels of CT also depress CMMC generation in male mouse colon (see above) and the motility effects of CT in rat jejunum (Kordasti et al. 2006) were recorded in males.
CT in female colon also produced a tonic constriction via 5‐HT3 receptor activation. This may have been due to inhibition of tonic firing in inhibitory motor neurons, consistent with the similar magnitude effect seen in the presence of TTX, or increased firing of excitatory motor neurons. As this constriction was not seen in TPH1‐knockout mice, it was probably due to the release of mucosal 5‐HT rather than activity of 5‐HT neurons in the myenteric plexus. However, our data cannot rule out any role for neuronal 5‐HT in the pathways responsible for either the CMMCs or the constriction. It has been proposed that neural 5‐HT3 receptors are constituently active, so blocking such receptors would modify neural activity in the absence of 5‐HT (Sia et al. 2013); however, bath‐applied granisetron did not modify either CMMC generation or colonic diameter in the absence of luminal CT. This indicates that it is unlikely that 5‐HT3 receptors are constitutively active in this preparation and that such a mechanism cannot explain the effects of this antagonist on CT‐induced changes in contractile activity in female colon.
In summary, CT in the lumen suppresses CMMC generation and produces a tonic constriction in a concentration‐ and oestrous cycle‐dependent fashion in ex vivo colon from female mice. This effect is rapid and reversible, in contrast to the hypersecretion induced by this toxin, which is much slower, suggesting that the altered motility is not secondary to the hypersecretion. It depends on the presence of mucosal 5‐HT and on activation of 5‐HT3 receptors, presumably on the mucosal terminals of intrinsic sensory neurons (Bertrand et al. 2000). The dependence of the effect of CT on the oestrous cycle probably results from cycle‐dependent changes in the number of 5‐HT‐immunoreactive EC cells in the mucosa, but the mechanism responsible for this requires further investigation.
Additional information
Competing interests
No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.
Author contributions
G.B. performed the experiments, J.C.B. conceived and designed the experiments, E.L.H. J.C.B. and G.B. wrote the manuscript. M.D.G. provided the TPH1KO mice and conceptual input, and assisted in writing the manuscript. Some experiments were carried out by G.B. in the laboratory of M.D.G. at Columbia University. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All persons designated as authors qualify for authorship, and all those who qualify for authorship are listed.
Funding
This study was supported by NHMRC grant 1006453 (J.C.B.) and NS15547 (M.D.G.).
References
- Alzamora R, O'Mahony F, Bustos V, Rapetti‐Mauss R, Urbach V, Cid LP, Sepúlveda FV & Harvey BJ (2011). Sexual dimorphism and oestrogen regulation of KCNE3 expression modulates the functional properties of KCNQ1 K+ channels. J Physiol 589, 5091–5907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Argenzio RA & Whipp SC (1981). Effect of Escherichia coli heat‐stable enterotoxin, cholera toxin and theophylline on ion transport in porcine colon. J Physiol 320, 469–487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Banks MR, Farthing MJG, Robberecht P & Burleigh DE (2005). Antisecretory actions of a novel vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) antagonist in human and rat small intestine. Br J Pharmacol 144, 994–1001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Banwell JG, Pierce NF, Mitra RC, Brigham KL, Caranasos GJ, Keimowitz RI, Fedson DS, Thomas J, Gorbach SL, Sack RB & Mondal A (1970). Intestinal fluid and electrolyte transport in human cholera. J Clin Invest 49, 183–195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Banwell JG & Sherr H (1973). Effect of bacterial enterotoxins on the gastrointestinal tract. Gastroenterology 65, 467–497. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bertrand PP, Kunze WAA, Furness JB & Bornstein JC (2000). The terminals of myenteric intrinsic primary afferent neurons of the guinea‐pig ileum are excited by 5‐HT acting at 5‐HT3 receptors. Neuroscience 101, 459–469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bohórquez DV, Shahid RA, Erdmann A, Kreger AM, Wang Y, Calakos N, Wang F & Liddle RA (2015). Neuroepithelial circuit formed by innervation of sensory enteroendocrine cells. J Clin Invest 125, 782–786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bornstein JC, Gwynne RM & Sjövall H (2012). Enteric neural regulation of mucosal secretion In Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract, 5th edn, ed. Johnson LR, pp. 769–790. Academic Press, Oxford. [Google Scholar]
- Braniste V, Leveque M, Buisson‐Brenac C, Bueno L, Fioramonte J & Houdeau E (2009). Oestradiol decreases colonic permeability through oestrogen receptor β‐mediated up‐regulation of occludin and junctional adhesion molecule‐A in epithelial cells. J Physiol 587, 3317–3328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cowles VE & Sarna S (1990. a). Relation between small intestinal motor activity and transit in secretory diarrhea. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 259, G420–G429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cowles VE & Sarna SK (1990. b). Effect of cholera toxin on small intestinal motor activity in the fed state. Dig Dis Sci 35, 353–359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cremon C, Carini G, Wang B, Vasina V, Cogliandro RF, De Giorgio R, Stanghellini V, Grundy D, Tonini M, De Ponti F, Corinaldesi R & Barbara G (2011). Intestinal serotonin release, sensory neuron activation, and abdominal pain in Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 106, 1290–1298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Datta S, Hey VM & Pleuvey BJ (1974). Effects of pregnancy and associated hormones in mouse intestine, in vivo and in vitro. Pflugers Arch 346, 87–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Farthing MJ (2002). Novel targets for the control secretory diarrhoea. Gut 50 Suppl 3, 15–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fauveau V, Koenig MA & Wojtyniak B (1991). Excess female deaths among rural Bangladeshi children: an examination of cause‐specific mortality and morbidity. Int J Epidemiol 20, 729–735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fida R, Lyster DJK, Bywater RAR & Taylor GS (1997). Colonic migrating motor complexes (CMMCs) in the isolated mouse colon. Neurogastroenterol Motil 9, 99–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Field M, Fromm D, Al‐Awqati Q & Greenough WB III (1972). Effect of cholera enterotoxin on ion transport across isolated ileal mucosa. J Clin Invest 51, 796–804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Finkelstein RA, Norris HT & Dutta NK (1964). Pathogenesis of experimental cholerera in infant rabbits. I. Observation on intraintestinal infection and experimental cholera produced with cell‐free productions. J Inf Dis 114, 203–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fung C, Ellis M & Bornstein JC (2010). Luminal cholera toxin alters motility in isolated guinea‐pig jejunum via a pathway independent of 5‐HT3 receptors. Front Neurosci 4, 162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fung C, Unterweger P, Parry LJ, Bornstein JC & Foong JPP (2014). VPAC1 receptors regulate intestinal secretion and muscle contractility by activating cholinergic neurons in guinea pig jejunum. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 306, G748–G758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gwynne RM, Thomas EA, Goh SM, Sjövall H & Bornstein JC (2004). Segmentation induced by intraluminal fatty acid in isolated guinea‐pig duodenum and jejunum. J Physiol 556, 557–569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heitkemper MM & Jarrett M (1992). Pattern of gastrointestinal and somatic symptoms across the menstrual cycle. Gastroenterology 102, 505–513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heredia DJ, Gershon MD, Koh SD, Corrigan RD, Okamoto T & Smith TK (2013). Important role of mucosal serotonin in colonic propulsion and peristaltic reflexes: in vitro analyses in mice lacking tryptophan hydroxylase 1. J Physiol 591, 5939–5957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hotta R, Stamp LA, Foong JPP, McConnell SN, Bergner AJ, Anderson RB, Enomoto H, Newgreen DF, Obermayr F, Furness JB & Young HM (2013). Transplanted progenitors generate functional enteric neurons in the postnatal colon. J Clin Invest 123, 1182–1191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kordasti S, Sapnara M, Thomas EA, Lindstrom E, Forsman M, Bornstein JC & Sjövall H (2006). Effects of cholera toxin on the potential difference and motor responses induced by distension in the rat proximal small intestine in vivo. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 290, G948–G958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lawson M, Kern F & Everson GT (1985). Gastrointestinal transit time in human pregnancy: prologation in the second and third trimester followed by postpartum normalization. Gastroenterology 89, 996–999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Z, Chalazonitis A, Huang Y‐Y, Mann JJ, Margolis KG, Yang QM, Kim DO, Côté F, Mallet J & Gershon MD (2011). Essential roles of enteric neuronal serotonin in gastrointestinal motility and the development/survival of enteric dopaminergic neurons. J Neurosci 31, 8998–9009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lundgren O (2002). Enteric nerves and diarrhoea. Pharmacol Toxicol 90, 109–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lundgren O & Jodal M (1997). The enteric nervous system and cholera toxin‐induced secretion. Comp Biochem Physiol A Physiol 118, 319–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Margolis KG, Stevanovic K, Li Z, Yang QM, Oravecz T, Zambrowicz B, Jhaver KG, Diacou A & Gershon MD (2014). Pharmacological reduction of mucosal but not neuronal serotonin opposes inflammation in mouse intestine. Gut 63, 928–937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mathias JR & Clench MH (1998). Relationship of reproductive hormones and neuromuscular disease of the gastrointestinal tract. Dig Dis Sci 16, 3–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mawe GM & Hoffman JM (2013). Serotonin signalling in the gut—functions, dysfunctions and therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 10, 473–486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palomba S, Di Cello A, Riccio E, Manguso F & La Salla GB (2011). Ovarian function and gastrointestinal motor activity. Minerva Endocrinol 36, 295–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roberts RR, Murphy JL, Young HM & Bornstein JC (2007). Development of colonic motility in the neonatal mouse – studies using spatiotemporal maps. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 292, G930–G938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sia TC, Whiting M, Kyloh M, Nicholas SJ, Oliver J, Brookes SJH, Dinning PG, Wattchow DA & Spencer NJ (2013). 5‐HT3 and 5‐HT4 antagonists inhibit peristaltic contractions in guinea‐pig distal colon by mechanisms independent of endogenous 5‐HT. Front Neurosci 7, 136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith TK & Gershon MD (2015). CrossTalk proposal: 5‐HT is necessary for peristalsis. J Physiol 593, 3225–3227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spencer NJ, Sia TC, Brookes SJH, Costa M & Keating DJ (2015). CrossTalk opposing view: 5‐HT is not necessary for peristalsis. J Physiol 593, 5229–5231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swaminathan M, Hill‐Yardin EL, Ellis M, Zygorodimos M, Johnston LA, Gwynne RM & Bornstein JC (2016). Video imaging and spatiotemporal maps to analyze gastrointestinal motility in mice. J Vis Exp, doi: 10.3791/53828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tornheim JA, Manya AS, Oyando N, Kabaka S, O'Reilly CE, Brieman RF & Feikin DR (2010). The epidemiology of hospitalization with diarrhea in rural Kenya: the utility of existing health facility data in developing coutries. Int J Inf Dis 14, e499–e505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tran M, Gallo LA, Wadley GD, Jefferies AJ, Moritz KM & Wlodek ME (2012). Effect of pregnancy for females born small on later life metabolic disease risk. PLoS One 7, e45188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Truswell AS (1985). Nutrition for pregnancy. BMJ 291, 263–266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turvill JL, Mourad FH & Farthing MJG (1999). Proabsorptive and prosecretory roles for nitric oxide in cholera toxin induced secretion. Gut 44, 33–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wada‐Hiraike O, Imamov O, Hiraike H, Hultenby K, Schwend T, Omoto Y, Warner M & Gustafsson JA (2006). Role of estrogen receptor β in colonic epithelium. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 103, 2059–2064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wald A, Van Thiel DH, Hoechstetter L, Gavaler JS, Egler KM, Verm R, Scott L & Lester R (1981). Gastrointestinal transit: The effect of the menstrual cycle. Gastroenterology 80, 1497–1500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wald A, Van Thiel DH, Hoechstetter L, Gavaler JS, Egler KM, Verm R, Scott L & Lester R (1982). Effect of pregnancy on gastronitestinal transit. Dig Dis Sci 27, 1015–1018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walther DJ, Peter J‐U, Bashammakh S, Hörtnagl H, Voits M, Fink H & Bader M (2003). Synthesis of serotonin by a second tryptophan hydroxylase isoform. Science 299, 76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WHO (2013). Diarrheal Disease Fact Sheet. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs330/en/ [Google Scholar]
