Abstract
Odorant receptors (ORs) control several aspects of cell fate in olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs), including singular gene choice and axonal identity. The mechanisms of OR-induced axon guidance have been suggested to principally rely on G-protein signalling. Here, we report that for a subset of OSNs, deleting G proteins or altering their levels of signalling does not affect axonal identity. Signalling-deficient ORs or surrogate receptors that are unable to couple to Gs/Golf still provide axons with distinct identities and the anterior–posterior targeting of axons does not correlate with the levels of cAMP produced by genetic modifications. In addition, we refine the models of negative feedback by showing that ectopic ORs can be robustly expressed without suppressing endogenous gene choice. In conclusion, our results uncover a new feature of ORs, showing that they can instruct axonal identity and regulate olfactory map formation independent of canonical G-protein signalling and cAMP production.
Keywords: olfactory receptor, axon guidance, olfaction, gene choice, GPCR, neuronal wiring
1. Introduction
Olfaction detects chemosensory stimuli with an enormous diversity in physico-chemical properties. To accommodate this broad recognition, the olfactory system employs a large repertoire of odorant receptors (ORs) [1,2]. OR genes form the largest multi-gene family in mammals, with the mouse having approximately 1100 functional receptors and approximately 200 pseudogenes [3]. Signal transduction through the OR is derived by ligand binding (odour) catalysing the bound heterotrimeric G-protein complex to exchange GDP for GTP in the Gα subunit and the dissociation from the Gβγ dimer. Gα bound to GTP subsequently activates adenylyl cyclase 3 (Adcy3), inducing the production of cyclic AMP (cAMP), which then binds to cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channels and depolarizes the cell membrane [4]. While one would expect that the OR's main role would be to detect odorants and initiate signal transduction, extensive evidence has shown that ORs also play pivotal roles in the development of the olfactory system [5,6]. However, dissecting the pluralistic roles of ORs has been challenging and their functions remain enigmatic.
Every olfactory sensory neuron (OSN) is thought to express only a single OR gene from a single allele, which is referred to as singular expression [7,8]. OSNs expressing a given OR are scattered throughout the epithelium but are confined to specific zones [9]. An important feature of the system is that the expression of an OR seems to preclude the expression of additional OR alleles, which is referred to as OR-induced feedback [10,11] and is shown to rely on Adcy3, histone demethylase LSD1 and the unfolded protein response [12–15].
Axons from OSNs that express the same singular expressed OR coalesce into two of the approximately 1800 glomeruli, typically one on the medial and one on the lateral side of the olfactory bulb [16]. The OR itself plays an important role in this impressive developmental task, since mutations that alter single amino acids within an OR sequence or its expression levels reroute axons and shift the position of the glomerulus [5,6,17]. All developmental outcomes by an OR can be substituted by surrogate receptors such as the highly divergent β2-adrenergic receptor [5,18,19]. These experiments have shown that glomeruli do not form an invariant topographical map, which would serve as ‘targets’ for ORs expressed on axons. Instead, glomeruli arise through homotypic interactions, in a context-dependent manner [6]. How ORs and other chemosensory receptors instruct an identity and regulate axonal interactions and glomerular formation has remained unclear. One hypothesis suggests that OR-induced wiring mechanisms fully rely on Gsα and Golfα signalling [18]; ORs would have an indirect role, one of regulating the expression levels of conventional axon guidance and identity molecules. In this model, each OR and OR polymorphism capable of generating unique glomeruli, would have a unique level of basal, agonist-independent activity, which would alter the transcriptional expression of axon guidance molecules such as neuropilin-1. The altered levels of cell surface molecules also regulate anterior–posterior (A-P) targeting of axons: low levels of cAMP result in anterior glomerular positioning and high levels of cAMP result in posterior glomerular positioning [20]. Following A-P positioning, agonist-dependent Golfα signalling in mature OSNs assists in segregating axons into unique glomeruli, by altering the expression levels of cell adhesion molecules, of which Kirrel2, Kirrel3 and BIG2 result in adhesion (attraction of ‘like’ axons), while EphA and ephrinA mediate contact-dependent repulsion (segregation of ‘non-like’ axons) [21–23]. Dorsoventral positioning of glomeruli does not rely on OR signalling, but instead correlates with the anatomical locations of OSNs in the olfactory epithelium and was shown to rely on two sets of repulsive ligands/receptors expressed by OSNs: neuropillin2/Sema3F and Slits/Robo2 [24–26].
We now provide evidence for an extended model of OR-mediated axonal wiring. Importantly, our results indicate that ORs also regulate A-P targeting and axonal identity via cAMP-independent mechanisms. In addition, our findings also redefine concepts within the field of OR gene regulation.
2. Results
2.1. Conditional deletion of Gsα does not affect the axonal targeting of M71 OSNs
We aimed to investigate the role of Gsα in the axonal targeting of M71 OSNs. The olfactory epithelium is stratified such that the basal stem cells reside beneath immature neurons that are positive for growth-associated protein 43 (Gap43) and these neurons are below mature neurons that are positive for olfactory marker protein (Omp). Simultaneous in situ hybridization (ISH) using Gnas (Gsα), Gap43 and Omp probes revealed detectable expression of Gnas in the basal stem cell layer of the developing olfactory epithelium in postnatal day (PD)6 animals that are Gnas-E1fl/fl (Gs WT, wild-type; figure 1a and electronic supplementary material figure S1d). Coexpression of Gnas was observed in only a fraction of immature neurons expressing Gap43, when ORs are first expressed and impart axonal identity to the axons (electronic supplementary material, figure S1k). By contrast, Gnal (Golfα) expression colocalized with Omp, indicating that it was mainly expressed in mature neurons (electronic supplementary material, figure S1e). To directly test the role of Gsα signalling in M71 OSNs, we sought to rely on the previously described Gnas-E1fl/fl mice to obtain a conditional knockout allele (cKO) for Gsα [27], since full Gsα KO animals are embryonically lethal. First, we wished to confirm that the Gnas-E1fl/fl mice could be used to delete Gs in OSNs. To this end, we used a transgenic Cre line in which Cre expression is driven by the olfactory epithelium specific #123 promoter. The #123 promoter has been previously shown to be active from an early developmental stage [28] and #123-Cre mice were successfully used to abolish Sema3F expression in immature OSNs [24]. We observed that in #123-Cre mice, Cre was expressed in all zones and within basal cells, immature and mature neurons (electronic supplementary material, figure S1a) and reliably removed the stop fragment in ROSA26-Stop-tauGFP reporter mice; mRNA expression of the tauGFP reporter was now observed in basal cells, immature and mature neurons (electronic supplementary material, figure S1b,c). All olfactory glomeruli appeared labelled by the ROSA26-tauGFP reporter after Cre recombination (electronic supplementary material, figure S1h). We next analysed the loss of Gsα from the entire olfactory epithelium in the #123-Cre×Gnas-E1fl/fl (Gs cKO) mice. The efficient excision of Gsα was readily observed in the vomeronasal organ (VNO), where the ubiquitous expression seen in WT mice was lost in Gs cKO animals (figure 1c versus d). In the olfactory epithelium, Gnas expression was strongly reduced in Gap43+ OSNs and was mainly limited to the most basal cells (figure 1b and electronic supplementary material, figure S1f). Thus, this shows that the Gnas-E1fl/fl mice can be used to eliminate Gsα expression in OSNs. Of note, in the #123-Cre × Gnas-E1fl/fl mice, Gnal expression was maintained in mature OSNs with no derepression in immature or basal cells (electronic supplementary material, figure S1g). Remarkably, glomeruli appeared normal in the #123-Cre × Gnas-E1fl/fl mice (electronic supplementary material, figure S1i) and, by using OR reporters, we observed that M72-LacZ and MOR23-LacZ glomeruli were identical in pattern in both Gs WT and #123-Cre-induced Gs cKO genetic backgrounds (figure 1e–h; electronic supplementary material, figure S1j). Since deletion of Gs has been previously shown to affect axonal targeting of OSNs [18], this suggests that the #123-Cre promoter is not active early enough during embryonic or neuronal development. Next we set up a mosaic analysis of Gs WT and Gs cKO in OSNs expressing the M71 OR. By using M71-Cre mice and relying on the monoallelic expression pattern of OR genes, we generated a mouse cross containing four different mutant alleles in which M71 OSNs were now either: (i) RFP+ and Gs WT or (ii) GFP+ and Gs cKO (figure 1i). No aberrations in axonal targeting were observed in the mutant population of axons (figure 1j,k); all axons co-converged and coalesced. Finally, we did not observe any deficits in the glomerular formation of M71-GFP axons in Gnal−/− (Golf KO) animals (figure 1l; electronic supplementary material, figure S1l) and no expression of Gsα protein was observable in Golf KO M71-GFP OSNs (data not shown).
2.2. A decrease in G-protein signalling, via the expression of a dominant-negative Gs mutant, does not shift the position of M71 glomeruli
To corroborate our Gs cKO and Golf KO results, we envisaged an alternative approach to inhibit basal levels of G-protein signalling by expressing a dominant-negative Gsα (dnGs) mutant that has been reported to efficiently inhibit Gsα signalling [29]. This dnGs mutant is likely to compete with both Gsα and Golfα, thereby reducing basal, agonist-independent G-protein signalling regardless of whether OSNs are expressing Gsα or Golfα. By contrast to the KO experiments, which is a gene ablation in all cells, we wished to set up a competition between cells that contained the dnGs and those that did not, similar to the experiments done with the heterozygous deletion of the X-linked Cnga2 gene in female mice [30,31]. This type of experiment would cripple one population of cells by dnGs and be directly compared to a WT population of cells in the same animal. Thus, we developed a new approach, the ROSA26 Mosaic or RoMo system, for mosaic analysis by combining stochastic Cre recombination [32] with gene targeting in the ROSA26 locus [33] (figure 2a). When using cell-type specific promoters to drive Cre expression in RoMo-control mice, we observed a mosaic population of cells, expressing either Turquoise or Tomato (data not shown). This led us to construct a second mouse strain, RoMo-dnGs, where the expression of Tomato is now linked to the expression of a dnGs gene via an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) sequence. Initially, we crossed RoMo-dnGs with OMP-Cre mice to induce recombination in all mature OSNs. Again a mosaic population of either Turquoise+ or Tomato-dnGs+ OSNs was observed in the VNO and main olfactory epithelium (MOE) (figure 2b). No apparent segregation of axons was observed in the olfactory glomeruli (data not shown), possibly because the effects of dnGs occurred too late in the development of OSNs. Therefore, to induce recombination in immature OSNs, we crossed RoMo-dnGs mice with our previously described #123-Cre mice. Mosaic expression was observed in the MOE, but both populations of axons converged and comingled into normal glomerular patterns (figure 2c). Finally, we sought to investigate how the expression of dnGs affects the identity and basal activity of M71 expressing OSNs by crossing RoMo-dnGs to M71-Cre mice. Mosaic expression was observed with axons that fully converged and comingled (figure 2d), indicating that expression of dnGs did not change axonal identity or the glomerular position of M71 OSNs. This suggests that either the inhibition of basal Gs activity did not affect M71 axonal identity or that the dnGs was not functional. It has been reported that spontaneous OSN spiking is fully dependent on the basal signalling of ORs [34]. Therefore, we reasoned that a dnGs-induced knockdown in G-protein signalling would be reflected by a reduction in spontaneous firing. Perforated patch-clamp recordings were performed on dendritic knobs of M71-Cre/Tomato-dnGs+ OSNs using an intact preparation [35]. M71-Cre/Tomato+ OSNs (from M71-Cre × RoMo-control mice) or M71-GFP OSNs were patched as control groups. Interestingly, M71-Cre/Tomato-dnGs+ OSNs exhibited strongly reduced numbers of spontaneous spikes (1.12 ± 0.39 Hz) compared with M71-Cre/Tomato+ (5.13 ± 0.77 Hz) or M71-GFP OSNs (5.25 ± 1.10 Hz; figure 2e; one-way ANOVA: F = 7.96065; p = 0.00123). The instantaneous firing frequency (IF) between these groups also differed (one-way ANOVA: F = 4.32191; p = 0.02078), with M71-Cre/Tomato-dnGs OSNs having a significantly higher IF (19.2 ± 1.8 Hz) than M71-Cre/Tomato+ (14.2 ± 1.0 Hz) and M71-GFP neurons (13.7 ± 1.3 Hz; figure 2f), indicating that M71-Cre/Tomato-dnGs OSNs have a higher tendency for bursting. The basal and IF firing rates of M71-Cre/Tomato+ and M71-GFP OSNs were not different. The reduction in spontaneous firing of M71-Cre/Tomato-dnGs OSNs strongly suggests that the dnGs inhibits basal, agonist-independent G-protein signalling and cAMP production. Since axons of Turquoise+ control OSNs and Tomato+ dnGs-affected OSNs coalesced in the dorsal bulb, this suggests that crippling basal G-protein signalling did not affect M71 axonal identity or glomerular positioning.
2.3. Increasing G-protein signalling, via the expression of a constitutively active Gs mutant, can modulate the M71 axonal identity but not the resulting position of its glomeruli
We have already addressed the consequences of downregulating G-protein signalling. Now, we wished to assess how axon targeting is affected by an increase in G-protein signalling in M71 neurons. Therefore, we generated the M71-caGs-GFP strain, in which the M71 locus was engineered to coexpress M71 together with a constitutively active Gs mutant (caGs) and a GFP reporter via a tricistronic mRNA (figure 3a). In homozygous M71-caGs-GFP mice, 16 out 36 bulbs showed a lateral GFP+ glomerulus at an A-P position comparable to that of WT M71 (figure 3b; Type 1 convergence). Remarkably, in the remainder of bulbs (55%), axons failed to converge into a glomerulus (figure 3c), indicating that glomerular formation was disrupted. Importantly, by crossing in the M71-RFP allele, we observed that M71-caGs-GFP axons converged with M71-RFP axons (figure 3e). This shows that when M71-caGs glomeruli were formed, they were not posterior to WT M71 glomeruli. This is not because of an intrinsic inability to shift M71 glomeruli posterior, since we have previously reported that the M71::GFP fusion protein induces a clear posterior shift [5]. However, we did observe that M71-caGs-GFP and M71-RFP axons formed compartmentalized glomeruli (figure 3e), indicating a subtle change in axonal identity. Together this shows that caGs co-expression did not shift the position of the glomerulus, but did affect axonal identity and glomerular formation.
The frequent failure to form M71-caGs-GFP glomeruli suggests that OR-independent signalling via the caGs mutant could disrupt glomerular formation. However, we cannot exclude that the aberrant wiring resulted from the tricistronic structure of the gene-targeted M71 locus. By generating the M71-M71-GFP strain, which harbours another tricistronic mutation in the M71 locus (figure 3a), we show that this is unlikely. In M71-M71-GFP mice, where instead of caGs we inserted a second M71 coding region, the formation of GFP+ glomeruli was always observed (figure 3d). Interestingly, M71-M71-GFP and M71-RFP axons also often formed a compartmentalized glomerulus (figure 3f), suggesting that the change in M71 protein levels was sufficient to change the identity of the axons.
2.4. ORs can regulate A-P targeting via cAMP-independent mechanisms
Our results indicate that Gs/Golf signalling and cAMP production are not the main drivers of A-P targeting in M71 OSNs. To further corroborate this, we wished to set up an experimental system in which OSNs would express different ORs but have the same level of G-protein signalling. If such axons would not coalesce, this would be a clear indication of an OR-instructed identity, independent of the levels of G-protein signalling. To achieve this, we thought to compare M71 OSNs in which the coding sequence (CDS) was exchanged with distinct signalling-deficient ORs and where G-protein signalling was rescued via expression of the caGs mutant. To induce signalling deficiency in ORs, we chose to mutate the highly conserved DRY motif, which is critical for regulating GPCR conformational states [36]. Mutating the E/DRY residues into REY or RDY has been previously shown to abolish G-protein signalling for Rhodopsin [37], CXCR4 [38] and the rat I7 OR [20]. To confirm that these mutations would indeed cause a loss of function phenotype, we created a gene-targeted strain in which the M71 DRY motif was replaced by RDY (D121R;R122D) along with an IRES-taulacZ reporter, M71(RDY)-LacZ (figure 4a). In contrast to M71-LacZ axons (figure 4b; electronic supplementary material, figure S2a), M71(RDY)-LacZ axons showed poor outgrowth, typically did not reach the cribiform plate and were not observed on the dorsal bulb (figure 4c; electronic supplementary material, figure S2b,c). Furthermore, the number of M71(RDY)-LacZ neurons rapidly decreased over time (electronic supplementary material, figure S2d) and by PD21 their numbers were 10-fold lower when compared with M71-LacZ neurons in age-matched animals (electronic supplementary material, figure S2e). This dramatic phenotype indicates that G-protein signalling in M71 OSNs is necessary when competing with normal OSNs.
Now we were in a position to test two additional mouse strains: M71(RDY)-caGs-GFP and MOR23(RDY) → M71-caGs-Tomato, in which the RDY mutant OR is coexpressed with a caGs to rescue G-protein signalling (figure 4a). Furthermore, in the MOR23(RDY) → M71-caGs-Tomato strain, the M71 CDS is replaced by a DRY → RDY mutant of the MOR23 CDS. The M71(RDY)-caGs-GFP and MOR23(RDY) → M71-caGs-Tomato OSNs thus express different ORs—M71(RDY) versus MOR23(RDY)—but should have the same level of G-protein signalling (derived from the OR-independent caGs mutant). Coexpression of caGs rescued axonal projections to the bulb for both M71(RDY)-caGs-GFP and MOR23(RDY) → M71-caGs-Tomato OSNs (figure 4d,e). The number of caGs-rescued OSNs remained very low (electronic supplementary material, figure S2e) and as a consequence glomerular formation was often inefficient [39]. In mice that were only heterozygous for one of the mutant alleles, axons projected to the expected A-P region, but glomerular formation was often not observed (e.g. Tomato+ axons figure 4f,h). These findings are also in line with what was seen for M71-caGs mice, where expression of caGs often disrupted glomerular formation (figure 3c). Importantly, however, M71(RDY)-caGs and MOR23(RDY) → M71-caGs axons projected to fundamentally different A-P regions (figure 4d,e). The differential identities of M71(RDY)-caGs-GFP and MOR23(RDY) → M71-caGs-Tomato axons were confirmed in a mixed cross, where coalescence was never observed between GFP+ and Tomato+ axons, and where GFP+ axons extended more posterior (figure 4f). Remarkably, M71(RDY) axons projected to the same A-P region as WT M71 axons, as was seen in M71-RFP × M71(RDY)-caGs-GFP mice (figure 4g). Similarly, MOR23(RDY) → M71-caGs-Tomato axons projected very close to WT MOR23 → M71-LacZ axons, which was anterior to M71 (figure 4h). Together this shows that M71(RDY)-caGs and MOR23(RDY)-caGs axons project to distinct A-P regions on the bulb, very close to the targeting site of their respective WT receptors. It is important to note that for both populations the caGs is expressed from the same locus with a similar tricistronic strategy. This suggests that ORs can regulate axonal targeting via cAMP-independent mechanisms.
2.5. G-protein signalling is critical for neuronal maturation and competition
Are DRY → RDY mutations in ORs blocking G-protein signalling? We observed that M71(RDY)-LacZ cells resided very basal in the epithelium suggesting that these cells were not mature and might not contain necessary signal transduction components to assess G-protein signalling. Thus, we used ISH to determine the percentage of Omp+ mature, Omp+Gap43+ intermediate and Gap43+ immature cells in normal and RDY strains of mice: M71-LacZ, M71(RDY)-LacZ, M71(RDY)-caGs-GFP and MOR23(RDY) → M71-caGs-Tomato OSNs (figure 5a). An almost complete absence of Omp+ mature OSNs was observed in the M71(RDY)-LacZ population (figure 5a). M71(RDY)-LacZ OSNs also failed to upregulate Adcy3 expression, a key component of the signalling machinery in mature OSNs (figure 5b). By contrast, Omp+ and Adcy3+ mature M71(RDY)-caGs and MOR23(RDY) → M71-caGs OSNs were observed, albeit at a lower percentage as compared with WT M71 (figure 5a,b). These results suggest that G-protein signalling may be a checkpoint in OSN maturation. Alternatively, the loss in G-protein signalling may render OSNs uncompetitive and they may be quickly eliminated as they mature, which would explain the rarely observed only Omp+ expressing M71(RDY)-LacZ OSNs.
We next wished to perform physiology to assess OR functionality. Since M71(RDY)-LacZ OSNs remained immature, they would not be suitable for recordings as their signalling machinery may not be functional. We therefore chose MOR23(RDY) → M71-caGs-Tomato OSNs, on which we performed perforated patch-clamp recordings. MOR23(RDY) → M71-caGs-Tomato neurons were stimulated with saturating concentrations of lyral (an MOR23 ligand), acetophenone (an M71 ligand), or a mixture of odorants that activates 66% of randomly patched OSNs in the MOE [40]. In our analysis, we only considered OSNs that responded to a mixture of IBMX and forskolin, which directly activates adenylate cyclases and indicates whether the neurons are mature. Of the 13 recorded OSNs that responded to IBMX + forskolin (out of 17 total), none responded to any of the other stimulants, showing that there is no chemical or mechanical activity in these neurons (figure 5c). In addition, MOR23(RDY) → M71-caGs OSNs exhibited almost no spontaneous activity, which is clearly present in WT MOR23 or M71 OSNs (figure 5d,e). Four conclusions are delineated: (i) DRY → RDY mutations uncouple ORs from G-protein signalling; (ii) no other ORs were coexpressed in these cells as MOR23(RDY) → M71-caGs OSNs never responded to the mixture of odorants (gene choice remained intact); (iii) spontaneous OSN spiking is indeed fully dependent on the basal signalling of ORs; and (iv) caGs does not elicit spontaneous spiking, indicating that the rescue of MOR23(RDY) OSNs does not require electrical activity.
2.6. One neuron–two receptors: OSNs in O/E2-M71-GFP mice coexpress the M71 OR together with an endogenous receptor
Our results show that signalling-deficient ORs can regulate the identity and A-P targeting of M71 axons, suggesting that this did not rely on differences in OR-induced cAMP levels. However, it may be argued that the M71(RDY) and MOR23(RDY) coding sequences differentially affect mRNA stability, thereby resulting in different caGs protein levels in M71(RDY)-caGs compared to MOR23(RDY)-caGs OSNs. To resolve these issues, we reasoned that forcing the coexpression of a WT OR in all OSNs may also rescue the maturation and axonal projections of M71(RDY) neurons. Furthermore, this might uniformly increase G-protein signalling in all OSNs, allowing a direct comparison of the A-P targeting of M71(RDY) with other ORs. Based on previous experiments using ubiquitously activated ORs via the ttA/tetO system [41–43], it was unclear whether it was a priori possible to coexpress a second OR in all OSNs. In theory, OR-mediated negative feedback mechanisms would prevent endogenous gene expression or endogenous genes would silence the expression of the ectopic OR [41,42].
In an attempt to express an OR in all OSNs, we started from the MOR23 cDNA (containing exons 1–3, Tg3'Δ, see [44]), where we removed the MOR23 promoter and MOR23 coding region and replaced it with an M71-IRES-tauGFP-ACNF cassette (figure 6a). This was subsequently cloned into the O/E2 targeting vector (TV) [45] and used to replace the first 6 exons of the O/E2 gene via gene targeting. In the resulting O/E2-M71-GFP strain, expression of an M71-IRES-tauGFP cDNA is placed under the control of the native O/E2 promoter, which is prominently expressed in all OSNs [45]. A widespread and bright intrinsic GFP fluorescence was seen in the MOE and VNO of O/E2-M71-GFP mice (figure 6b–e). All OSNs appeared GFP+, as did the glomeruli, which were homogeneously labelled and showed a normal morphology (figure 6f). Importantly, M71 mRNA was robustly observed in the whole MOE and VNO of O/E2-M71-GFP mice (figure 6g,h; electronic supplementary material, figure S3a,c). O/E2 expression is typically observed prior to Gap43, at a very immature neuronal stage of OSNs. M71 expression from O/E2-M71-GFP mice was also seen in this early OSN stage (figure 6g). The MOE of O/E2-M71-GFP mice had a normal multi-layered structure and thickness, comparable to that of O/E2 WT control animals (electronic supplementary material, figure S3b,d). Interestingly, it was evident that expression of M71 via the O/E2 promoter did not suppress endogenous OR expression. ISH showed coexpression of M71 with other unrelated class II OR genes (figure 6i). Next, NanoString was used to assess the expression of a random selection of OR genes in the MOE of O/E2-M71-GFP(+/−) and O/E2-WT littermates (figure 6j). Of the 19 OR genes tested, only one transcript showed a significant but small downregulation, showing that the majority of ORs had comparable expression levels in the two groups. In addition, the zonal expression of endogenous ORs in the MOE was not altered in O/E2-M71-GFP mice, as illustrated by crossing the mice to the M71-LacZ, MOR23-LacZ and P2-LacZ strains (figure 7a–c). As reported previously, OSNs that choose an OR locus that does not contain an OR gene—such as the ΔM71-LacZ allele where the M71 CDS is deleted—coexpress additional OR genes [5]. Therefore, the projection of lacZ+ axons in ΔM71-LacZ mice depends on the guidance properties of the other ORs, resulting in a divergent pattern of projections (figure 7d). Interestingly, distributed axons entering multiple glomeruli were also observed in ΔM71-LacZ mice crossed to O/E2-M71-GFP (figure 7d).
To investigate whether the ectopic M71 in O/E2-M71-GFP mice is functional and contributes to signalling and neuronal activity, we performed patch-clamp recordings on the MOE of O/E2-M71-GFP mice. In addition, we also crossed in the MOR23(RDY) → M71-caGs-Tomato mutation. In the resulting cross, we patched the dendritic knobs of random OSNs that express an unknown endogenous OR (GFP+ Tomato−) or MOR23(RDY) → M71-caGs OSNs (GFP+ Tomato+) and measured their responses to varying concentrations of the M71 ligand acetophenone. All randomly patched OSNs (n = 10) and MOR23(RDY) → M71-caGs OSNs (n = 10) responded to acetophenone (figure 8a,b). While responses were heterogeneous, most O/E2-M71-GFP neurons responded to concentrations above 10−5 M acetophenone (figure 8d,e). Responses to acetophenone were not widespread in the normal WT MOE, as in O/E2 WT littermates only 1 in 10 patched OSNs responded (figure 8c). As a reference we also patched WT M71 OSNs in M71-GFP mice and plotted a threshold frequency histogram, which represents the percentage of cells that responded to a specific threshold concentration (figure 8f). This showed that O/E2-M71-GFP neurons were less sensitive to acetophenone than M71-GFP OSNs. Importantly, O/E2-M71-GFP expression also rescued the spontaneous firing of MOR23(RDY) → M71-caGs OSNs, which now exhibited mean and instantaneous firing frequencies in the same range as that of randomly patched OSNs (figure 8g,h). Since without O/E2-M71-GFP expression MOR23(RDY) → M71-caGs OSNs exhibit no spontaneous firing (figure 5e), this shows that the ectopic M71 contributes to basal, agonist-independent, spiking in OSNs, while caGs does not.
2.7. O/E2-M71-GFP rescue experiments confirm that the A-P targeting of ORs and surrogate receptors can be driven by cAMP-independent mechanisms
We wondered how the ectopic M71 expression would affect M71-LacZ or MOR23 → M71-LacZ axonal projections. In O/E2-M71-GFP mutants, M71-LacZ+ and MOR23 → M71-LacZ OSNs formed glomeruli in the correct A-P position (figure 9a,b). However, M71 axons took altered routes on the bulb and traversed through regions were they are normally excluded and often formed an additional glomerulus at the same A-P position (figure 9a,b; electronic supplementary material, figure S4).
We next tested the consequence of adding M71 expression to signalling-deficient M71(RDY) OSNs. O/E2-M71-GFP expression rescued axon outgrowth of M71(RDY)-LacZ OSNs, which formed two points of coalescence on the dorsal bulb (figure 9d,f). An ectopic convergence point was observed in an anteromedial region of the dorsal bulb, where both medial and lateral projecting axons co-converged (figure 9d, white arrow). The lateral M71(RDY) glomerulus was observed at the same A-P region as WT M71 glomeruli (figure 9d, black arrow), which was clearly more posterior than MOR23 → M71-LacZ or MOR23(RDY) → M71-caGs-Tomato axons (figure 9b,c,e). Importantly, in O/E2-M71-GFP mice, M71(RDY)-LacZ OSNs have lower levels of basal G-protein signalling than MOR23 → M71-LacZ OSNs or MOR23(RDY) → M71-caGs-Tomato OSNs. Indeed, while in M71(RDY)-LacZ OSNs only the O/E2-derived ectopic M71 contributes to cAMP production, in the latter two populations this is combined with cAMP stemming from the WT MOR23 receptor or the caGs mutant, respectively. Therefore, despite having lower levels of cAMP, M71(RDY) axons project more posterior than MOR23 → M71-LacZ or MOR23(RDY) → M71-caGs-Tomato OSNs. This again highlights that in M71 or M71-swapped OSNs A-P targeting relies on the expressed OR but not on the levels of cAMP production.
Can we ascertain that the axonal identity and glomerular targeting of O/E2-M71 × M71(RDY) OSNs is imparted by the M71(RDY) OR or could it be derived from the ectopic O/E2-M71 alone? We have previously reported that in V1rb2 → M71-LacZ mice, where the M71 CDS is replaced by the vomeronasal receptor V1rb2, axonal outgrowth and coalescence is very inefficient [5]. Interestingly, O/E2-M71-GFP expression rescued the axonal projections of V1rb2 → M71-LacZ OSNs, which in all analysed bulbs efficiently formed glomerular-like structures (figure 9g). This shows that upon O/E2-M71 rescue, V1rb2 can efficiently substitute for an OR and induce a unique axonal convergence. Importantly, V1rb2 → M71-LacZ axons had a different identity and a convergence point that was positioned much more anterior than M71(RDY)-LacZ axons. Since both M71(RDY) and V1rb2 are GPCRs that cannot couple to Gs/Golf, this confirms that their axonal identity and A-P positioning were shaped by OR-dependent, Gsα/Golfα-independent mechanisms.
It has been suggested that the level of basal, agonist-independent G-protein signalling regulates the expression of neuropilin-1 (Nrp1), plexin-A1 (Plxna1) and semaphorin-3A (Sema3a) and that these molecules are the main drivers of A-P targeting [18]. To examine whether in O/E2-M71-GFP mice the expression levels of these and other cell adhesion molecules were affected, we performed NanoString analysis on the MOE of O/E2-M71-GFP mutant versus WT littermates (figure 9h). There were no changes in the expression levels of any of the neuropilin, semaphorin or plexin genes tested. Surprisingly, we observed a significant downregulation of Kirrel2 and Epha5 together with an increase of ephrin-A5 in O/E2-M71-GFP mice (figure 9h). Remarkably, both signalling impaired CNGA2 KO mice and activity reduced, naris occluded animals are known to have this same expression pattern [21]. This suggests that in O/E2-M71-GFP mice there is a general reduction in the electrical activity of OSNs.
3. Discussion
Our results provide a set of profound insights into how the OR regulates the developmental pathway of OSNs, starting from regulation of gene choice, to OSN maturation and finally to axonal identity and glomerular formation.
3.1. Negative feedback by OR genes
Forcing the widespread expression of an OR using transgenic approaches has not been straightforward, which has contributed to shaping the current models of OR-induced feedback. To achieve ectopic OR expression, several groups have used the tetO-TTA system using immature/mature neuronal TTA drivers [41–43]. These TTA-induced transgenic ORs are able to suppress the expression of endogenous ORs. Remarkably, it has been suggested that the tetO-driven ORs themselves can be silenced by the endogenous ORs, implying that OR coding regions are targets for feedback mediated suppression [41]. Remarkably, all OSNs in O/E2-M71 mice robustly express M71 together with an endogenous OR, while maintaining their specific glomerular formation. This coexpression shows that OR coding regions, including the 5′ and 3′ UTRs, are not targets for feedback suppression, otherwise the endogenous OR would have blocked O/E2-M71 expression. But why did the O/E2-M71 OR, which was already expressed very early in OSN development, not suppress the endogenous OR? One explanation is that negative feedback does not suppress first choice, but only subsequent choices. The projection pattern of ΔM71 OSNs—where first choice does not lead to the expression of an OR—was similar in an O/E2-M71-GFP background. This may indicate that OSNs that have chosen to express the ΔM71 locus still choose a second OR locus for expression, despite the ubiquitous expression of M71 from the O/E2 promoter. An alternative explanation is that second OR choice is blocked by O/E2-M71, but its expression alone is not able to efficiently coalesce ΔM71-LacZ axons into distinct glomeruli. Further characterization of the expressed ORs in ΔM71 OSNs is needed to resolve this.
An explanation for the lack of suppression is that the O/E2-M71 expression levels do not reach a required threshold level to induce feedback. This would imply that robust expression levels that are sufficient to rescue axon outgrowth and neuronal maturation of OSNs are not sufficient to induce negative feedback. It has recently been proposed that stable OR gene expression requires the recruitment of many cis- and trans-acting enhancers [15]. It is therefore possible that gene choice remains open until one OR locus is able to recruit a sufficient number of enhancers and achieve a high threshold level of expression. Interestingly, recent reports by Hanchate and colleagues [46] have shown that developing OSNs transition from expressing low levels of multiple ORs to expressing high levels of a single OR. These results fit with the interpretation that sub-threshold expression of an OR early in developing OSNs does not block gene choice. Our results also suggest that the expression of an OR is coupled to OSN maturation, as described below.
3.2. G-protein signalling and the expression of a functional OR promote OSN maturation
Our results indicate that OSNs expressing ORs with G-protein coupling mutations in the DRY motif remained in an immature state, were unable to send axons to the bulb and were gradually eliminated from the epithelium. Co-expression of a caGs was able to rescue OSN maturation, with the reappearance of Omp+ Adcy3+ OSNs and axonal projections on the bulb. One explanation for these observations is activity-dependent competition [30], which would result in the rapid elimination of OSNs expressing signalling-deficient ORs. However, no agonist-dependent or -independent neuronal spiking was observed in caGs-rescued OSNs. This suggests that the spatio-temporal dynamics of cAMP production by the caGs did not reach spike threshold levels. Furthermore, the total number of caGs-rescued OSNs in the MOE remained very low, indicating that they were still being eliminated. Together, this makes it unlikely that the caGs-induced reappearance of mature OSNs was linked to activity-dependent competition. One plausible explanation for the observed caGs rescue is a slow or small accumulation of cAMP in immature OSNs that result in a differentiation/maturation signal to the nucleus. Therefore, the expression of a functional OR that is capable of inducing G-protein signalling may directly promote OSN maturation. Interestingly, reports by Lomvardas and co-workers [13] have shown that ORs induce Adcy3 expression via Perk and ATF5 signalling. Adcy3 subsequently downregulates Lsd1 expression, thereby stabilizing OR gene choice [14]. Since the expression of a functional OR, coupled to G-protein signalling, promotes maturation and Adcy3 expression, this could further help in stabilizing OR gene choice. An apparent benefit would be an increased ability to filter out the many dysfunctional OR genes in the repertoire, since signalling-deficient ORs would be less efficient in inducing maturation and Adcy3 upregulation.
The rescue of OSNs by O/E2-M71 is also likely to involve a permissive signal that promotes OSN maturation or survival. Surprisingly, however, OE2-M71 OSNs also showed alterations in the expression of activity-dependent axon guidance molecules that are normally suppressed or enhanced in naris occlusion or CNG2A KO backgrounds [21]. Thus, the rescue of axonal outgrowth in M71(RDY) → M71-LacZ and V1rb2 → M71-LacZ in O/E2-M71-GFP mice may be further enhanced through a reduction in activity-dependent competition, as has been observed in male CNGA2 KO mice (−/0) or naris occluded CNGA2 (+/−) female mice [30]. Why would the ectopic expression of M71 result in a general reduction of activity? We speculate that the ectopic M71 competes for space with the endogenous ORs in the cilia, thereby reducing the sensitivity of OSNs for most odours except M71 ligands. This would concomitantly result in a global reduction in OSN activity.
We show that mosaic Gsα expression using M71-Cre does not result in a differential A-P targeting of WT and Gs cKO axons. This does not strictly mean that Gs is not involved in the development or axonal targeting of M71 OSNs, but rather that the levels of Gsα expression can vary in convergent populations of axons. It also suggests that deleting Gs shortly after the onset of OR expression does not lead to a differential A-P targeting or segregation of WT and cKO axons. It is possible that Gs deletion occurs too late, for example that Gs protein carried over from the basal stem state to immature OSNs is sufficient to support signalling. In this regard, there are indications that Gs mRNA may have a long half-life [47]. Also, if Cre recombination at the Gnas locus is not very efficient, then Gs may be deleted with some delay following Cre onset. In the absence of Gs, low levels of Golf protein may rescue G-protein signalling. However, Golf by itself was not critical, since Golf KO animals retained normal formation of M71 glomeruli in the dorsal bulb consistent with previous reports for P2 [48] and rI7 [18] glomeruli. While keeping some of the aforementioned caveats in mind, based on our mosaic Cre-deletion experiments, we speculate that leaky or low levels of Gs or Golf protein are sufficient to support normal axonal targeting. We favour the interpretation that Gs carried over from basal cells to immature OSNs plays a role in kick-starting signal transduction shortly after OSNs start to express an OR. This would subsequently promote maturation and further upregulation of the signal transduction machinery. In line with this Nakashima and colleagues [18] have shown that simultaneous deletion of both Gs and Golf results in severe targeting defects.
3.3. A case for cAMP-independent mechanisms in regulating A-P targeting and axonal identity of M71 or M71-swapped OSNs
The molecular mechanism of how ORs and other chemosensory receptors provide ‘self’ identity, thereby regulating axonal interactions and glomerular formation in the olfactory system, remains unclear. The state of OSN activity has often been ascribed as having a role in axonal wiring [49]. One model for axonal identity is based on OR-specific G-protein signalling that would in turn provide discrete levels of cAMP within each type of OSN [23]. The source of cAMP production would be derived by Gsα signalling within immature OSNs and Golfα signalling within mature OSNs. Interestingly, we now have obtained results which show that for M71 or M71-swapped OSNs, OR-induced A-P targeting also relies on cAMP-independent mechanisms. This conclusion is based on various observations.
If A-P targeting would solely rely on differences in basal cAMP levels, then OSNs with the same level of basal G-protein signalling would project to the same A-P position, irrespective of the expressed OR. Since every OR is suggested to induce different basal activities, we devised a genetic swap experiment, where we expressed different signalling-deficient ORs from the same endogenous locus, and restored activity via receptor-independent G-protein signalling. Importantly, this showed that signalling-deficient M71(RDY) and MOR23(RDY) ORs induced distinct identities and projected axons to different A-P regions on the bulb, close to the cognate WT receptor. These data show that even in the absence of effective coupling of ORs to G proteins, M71(RDY) and MOR23(RDY) ORs were still regulating A-P targeting. Furthermore, M71(RDY) and MOR23(RDY) → M71 axons did not coalesce, showing that they also had different identities. This suggests that both A-P targeting and axonal identity can be regulated via cAMP-independent mechanisms. However, we cannot rule out small differences in mRNA stability, leading to differential caGs protein levels, or that the RDY mutants still possess some difficult to detect residual activity. In this regard, the expression of caGs may provide a permissive environment to allow OSN maturation and axon outgrowth. Under this condition, the coupling of the mutant ORs with the G proteins, albeit ineffective, may still affect glomerular positioning. However, it is questionable if the system would be sensitive enough to detect such small variations in signalling. Moreover, a striking observation, which cannot easily be explained by the aforementioned arguments, was that M71(RDY) and MOR23(RDY) ORs sent axons to the same A-P position as their respective WT receptors.
To further investigate how subtle changes in G-protein signalling would affect axonal identity and A-P targeting in M71 OSNs, we also modified cAMP production through the coexpression of a constitutively active or dominant-negative Gsα mutant. Using a mosaic readout, neither was found to induce a shift in the position of M71 glomeruli. However, one cautionary note is that we do not yet know to what extent the dnGs or caGs mutants modulate basal cAMP production in OSNs. In the case of the dnGs mutant, we used spontaneous electrical activity as a proxy for basal cAMP signalling, which is based on previous observations [34,50]. However, this does not allow us to ascertain the exact level of cAMP inhibition, which will require new experimental approaches. Our results with the Gsα mutant Q227L are in contrast to the changes observed for the rI7 glomeruli, where the same Gs mutant could shift the glomerular position [20]. One explanation may be found in the heterogeneity of OSNs. The existence of different OSN cell types that target to distinct domains on the bulb has been demonstrated [51]. Our work is centred on OSNs that are able to choose the endogenous M71 locus, while Imai and colleagues [20] use the MOR23 minigene strategy, a transgene expressed in OSNs that are able to choose the endogenous MOR23 locus. Our results may suggest that the importance of G-protein signalling and cAMP production in axonal wiring may vary depending on the OSN cell type. Alternatively, the difference may simply be due to the transgenic versus gene-targeted approach. The transgenic approach is sensitive to variations in transcription levels, cell-type expression and RNA stability, which can also affect the expression levels of caGs.
Additional evidence showing that ORs can regulate A-P targeting via cAMP-independent mechanisms was provided by the O/E2-M71 rescue experiments. These showed that upon O/E2-M71 rescue, the A-P position of the lateral M71(RDY) glomeruli closely matched that of WT M71, which could not be explained by invoking the levels of G-protein signalling and cAMP production. We also show that upon O/E2-M71 rescue, the V1rb2 receptor can robustly provide for axonal identity and the coalescence of axons. Importantly, the M71(RDY) and V1rb2 glomeruli were in completely different regions of the bulb. This shows that in a permissive environment (via O/E2-M71 expression), the M71(RDY) and V1rb2 genes regulate A-P targeting and axonal coalescence. Since both receptors have a deficiency in coupling to Gs/Golf, this suggests the involvement of cAMP-independent mechanisms.
An important recent discovery was the existence of a developmental critical period in olfactory map formation [52,53]. Work by the Barnea laboratory has shown that tetO-TTA-mediated ectopic expression of MOR28 in a subset of OSNs results in the appearance of multiple transgenic MOR28 glomeruli. Interestingly, if transgene expression is active during early development, endogenous MOR28 axons are found to reroute to additional nearby glomeruli that are co-innervated by transgenic MOR28 axons. This shows that the axonal targeting of OSNs is affected by other OSNs that express the same OR, indicating non-cell autonomous effects [52]. Interestingly, a striking feature of the axonal projections in O/E2-M71 mice was that OSNs expressing a given OR took altered routes on the bulb and often formed multiple glomeruli (see the electronic supplementary material, figure S4 for additional examples). One hypothesis is that due to the global co-expression of M71 in all OSNs, there are now M71-dependent homotypic interactions between axons that express different endogenous ORs. These interactions may allow axons to trail along novel axonal tracts and thus re-route to nearby regions. If this hypothesis were to be correct, it is likely that the M71-induced homotypic interactions are not cAMP-dependent, since the ectopic M71 expression is global and should affect G-protein signalling to the same extent in all OSNs.
3.4. A case for cAMP/activity-dependent mechanisms in regulating axonal identity and glomerular formation
Importantly, in an O/E2-M71 background, M71(RDY) axonal projections did not completely mirror those of WT M71. Indeed, the medial M71(RDY) glomeruli were in a new ectopic anterior position. Two independent groups have shown that in Adcy3(−/−) animals, M71 and M72 axons form, besides the expected glomeruli, an additional glomerulus in an anteromedial region [54,55]. Strikingly, the position of the anteromedial Adcy3(−/−) M71 glomeruli closely resembles that of the medial O/E2-rescued M71(RDY) glomeruli. This invites the hypothesis that in the absence of normal G-protein-dependent activity, additional glomeruli can be formed. This activity-dependent exclusion may rely on specific adhesive or repulsive axon guidance molecules such as neuropilin, kirrel and ephrins, the expression of which may be altered or lost in activity mutants [54]. In this regard, the altered axonal projections and mistargeting observed in O/E2-M71 mice, may in part be due to our observed changes in the expression of Kirrel2, Epha5 and ephrin-A5.
Furthermore, we observed that M71 and M71(RDY)-caGs axons had distinct identities. It is known that even single amino acid substitutions can alter axonal identity [6]. Importantly, M71 and M71(RDY)-caGs have completely different activity profiles, with M71(RDY)-caGs OSNs resembling activity knockouts. This suggests that the differential axonal identities of these OSNs are shaped by their neuronal activity patterns. The importance of neuronal activity for axonal identity and glomerular segregation has been previously reported. For example, blocking neuronal activity via the forced expression of Kir2.1 leads to the erroneous innervation of multiple glomeruli by neurons expressing the same OR [53]. The segregation of M71 and M71-caGs axons further fits this interpretation. CaGs-induced changes in G-protein signalling may affect the expression of adhesive/repulsive molecules and thereby change axonal identity [23]. Furthermore, while in the presence of a WT allele M71-caGs axons were consistently found to converge with M71 glomeruli, in homozygous mutants glomerular formation of M71-caGs OSNs was frequently disrupted. While the mechanistic reasons are unclear, we speculate that this is due to a reduction of neuronal survival leading to fewer projections present needed to form stable glomeruli [39]. Remarkably, a previous study has shown that the expression of caGs via retroviral vectors can also induce the convergence of axons expressing different ORs [56].
4. Conclusion
In conclusion, our results suggest that, besides activity-dependent mechanisms, the A-P targeting and axonal identity of OSNs is also regulated by mechanisms that do not rely on cAMP production. That ORs can regulate axonal wiring via cAMP-independent mechanisms is yet another surprising feature of these highly pluralistic proteins. How do ORs, which are present in olfactory axons [5,57], support axonal wiring without relying on canonical G-protein signalling? Based on our contextual model of axonal coalescence [6], we previously proposed that a possible mechanism of axonal identity is through ORs providing structural identity (a key) to as yet unidentified cofactors, which would mediate homotypic interactions. Recent work also suggests that ORs can instruct adhesive properties in cells [58]. Alternatively, other G-proteins that do not couple via the DRY motif or non-canonical signalling pathways (e.g. Perk) may be involved. These will be interesting starting points for future investigations.
5. Material and methods
5.1. Gene targeting and experimental animals
Targeting constructs for M71(RDY)-lacZ, M71(RDY)-caGs-GFP, MOR23(RDY) → M71-caGs-Tomato and M71-M71-GFP were generated by modifying the described M71 TV [5]. The O/E2-M71-GFP targeting construct was generated by modifying the described O/E2 TV [45]. The RoMo-control and RoMo-dnGs targeting vectors were generated by modifying the described Gateway-compatible ROSA26 locus targeting vectors [59].
5.1.1. M71(RDY)-lacZ, M71(RDY)-caGs-GFP, M71-caGs-GFP, MOR23(RDY) → M71-caGs-Tomato
Starting from the 9.2 kb M71 genomic sequence [5], we first generated an M71(RDY)-ACNF and an MOR23(RDY) → M71-ACNF TV. For M71(RDY)-ACNF, this included four point mutations in the M71 coding region (GACCGC → CGCGAC), resulting in the D121R;R122D substitutions. For the MOR23(RDY) → M71 swap, the 930 bp M71 coding region was replaced with the 930 bp MOR23 coding region, which again harboured four point mutations (GATCGT → CGTGAT) resulting in the same D121R;R122D substitutions. An FseI and an AscI restriction site was inserted three nucleotides after the stop codon of the M71(RDY) or MOR23(RDY) CDS, and was followed by an ACNF cassette, which is a neo selection cassette, that is self-excised during transmission though the male germ line [60]. The IRES-taulacZ, IRES-caGs-IRES-tauGFP or IRES-caGs-IRES-tautdTomato cassettes were subsequently inserted via directional cloning using the FseI and AscI sites, generating the M71(RDY)-taulacZ-ACNF, M71(RDY)-caGs-tauGFP-ACNF and the MOR23(RDY) → M71-caGs-tautdTomato-ACNF targeting vectors. The constitutively active Gαs mutant (Q227L) is previously described [61]. The M71-caGs-GFP strain was derived by screening targeted M71(RDY)-caGs-GFP embryonic stem (ES) cell clones via restriction fragment length polymorphism and sequencing to find clones in which the 5' homologous recombination event was after the DRY → RDY mutation. For M71-M71-GFP, an IRES-M71-IRES-tauGFP-LNL cassette was inserted via PacI, three nucleotides after the stop codon of M71 CDS. The LNL neo cassette was removed by crossing to EIIA-Cre mice [62].
5.1.2. O/E2-M71-GFP
The O/E2-M71-GFP targeting construct was generated by ligating an AscI M71-IRES-tauGFP-ACNF fragment into the O/E2 TV [45]. This AscI fragment was constructed using the Tg3'Δ construct without the 405 bp MOR23 promoter and with the 930 bp MOR23 CDS replaced with the 930 bp M71 CDS followed by a PacI site. In addition, an IRES-tauGFP-ACNF PacI cassette was cloned into the AscI cassette.
5.1.3. Romo-control and RoMo-dnGs
To generate the RoMo-control and RoMo-dnGs TVs, we modified the previously described attL4-pCAGG-loxP-Bgeo-3xpA-loxP-attR1 Gateway-compatible entry clone (pCAGG entry clone) [59], which was obtained via the BCCM/LMBP Plasmid Collection. A loxN-taumTurquoise-WPRE-pA-lox2272-loxN-tautdTomato-WPRE-pA-lox2272-attL3 (for RoMo-control) or loxN-taumTurquoise-WPRE-pA-lox2272-loxN-tautdTomato-IRES-dnGs-WPRE-pA-lox2272-attL3 (for RoMo-dnGs) cassette was inserted into the pCAGG entry clone via kpnI and NotI directional cloning, which also removed the attR1 site. This entry clone was subsequently inserted into the pROSA26-DV3 destination vector [59] provided by BCCM/LMBP using Gateway cloning (LR reaction between attL3-attR3 and attL4-attR4). LR reactions were performed using the Clonase Enzyme Mix (Invitrogen) following the supplier's instructions. β-geo-STOP is a β-galactosidase–neomycin fusion gene, followed by three pA sequences, that allows for selection in ES cells and is expressed in the absence of Cre recombination. The dominant-negative Gαs mutant (α3β5/G226A/A366S) is previously described [29] and was kindly provided by Dr Catherine Berlot (Weis Center for Research, USA). mTurquoise [63] was kindly provided by Dr Theodorus W. J. Gadella (University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands). The woodchuck hepatitis virus posttranscriptional regulatory element (WPRE) was used to increase expression levels [64].
Gene targeting was performed in E14 ES cells as described [17]. ES cells were injected into C57BL/6 blastocysts. Mice are in a mixed 129/B6 background. All generated mice will be made publicly available via the Jackson Laboratory: M71(RDY)-lacZ: B6;129P2-Olfr151<tm38Mom>/MomJ, stock# 23669; M71(RDY)-caGs-GFP: B6;129P2-Olfr151<tm39(Gnas*)Mom>/MomJ, stock# 23672; MOR23(RDY) → M71-caGs-Tomato: B6;129P2-Olfr151<tm37 (Olfr16*,-Gnas*,-tdTomato)Mom>/MomJ, stock# 22789; M71-caGs-GFP: B6;129P2-Olfr151<tm40(Gnas*)Mom>/MomJ, stock# 24642; M71-M71-GFP: B6;129P2-Olfr151<tm39(Olfr151)Mom>/MomJ, stock# 8092; O/E2-M71-GFP: B6;129P2-Ebf3<tm1(Olfr151)Mom>/MomJ, stock# 8094; RoMo-control: B6;129P2-Gt(ROSA)26Sor<tm3Mom>/MomJ; stock# 18670; RoMo-dnGs: B6;129P2-Gt(ROSA)26Sor<tm2Mom>/MomJ, stock# 18669.
Previously described strains that were used in this study (see also the electronic supplementary material, figure S5) are: M71-LacZ, M71-GFP, MOR23 → M71-LacZ, V1rb2 → M71-LacZ, M72-LacZ, ΔM71-LacZ [5], M71-RFP, M71-Cre, OMP-Cre [65], P2-LacZ [17], MOR23-LacZ and MOR23-GFP [44]. #123-Cre mice [24], Gnas-E1fl/fl mice [27], R26-STOP-tauGFP (ROSA26-CAGS-tauGFP) mice [66] and Golf KO mice [48] were kindly provided by Dr Yoshihiro Yoshihara, Dr Lee Weinstein, Dr Ulrich Boehm and Dr Leonardo Belluscio, respectively.
5.2. Wholemount staining and imaging
Wholemount X-gal staining was performed as previously described [17]. The A-P and D-V coordinates of X-gal-stained glomeruli in wholemounts where determined using ImageJ software. Intrinsic fluorescence in wholemounts was acquired with an upright Zeiss LSM710 microscope. Images were collected as z-stacks followed by maximum intensity projection to a single image.
5.3. ISH and IHC
Mice were anaesthetized and perfused with 4% PFA in PBS. Heads were post-fixed, decalcified, cryoprotected, frozen and sectioned at 12 µm, as described [40]. IHC was performed as described [40]. The following antibodies were used: chicken-anti-βGal (Abcam, ab9361), chicken-anti-GFP (Abcam, ab13970), rabbit-anti-Dsred (Clontech, 632496), donkey-anti-rabbit AF555 (Invitrogen, A31572), goat-anti-chicken AF488 (Invitrogen, A11039). Multi-colour ISH was performed as previously described [67]. For riboprobes that were used, see the electronic supplementary material, table S1. For quantifying the percentage of OSNs at distinct maturation states in figure 5a,b, every 10th section was collected from anterior to posterior and 42 sections were analysed per mouse.
5.4. Patch-clamp recordings
Animals were allowed access to food and water ad libitum and were kept on a 12 L : 12 D cycle, with a constant temperature.
Patch-clamp recordings were performed as described earlier [35,68]. Briefly, male or female gene-targeted three to five-weeks-old mice were anaesthetized by injection of ketamine HCl and xylazine (150 mg kg−1 and 10 mg kg−1 body weight, respectively), and then decapitated. The head was immersed in ice cold Ringer's solution, which contained (in millimolar): NaCl 124, KCl 3, MgSO4 1.3, CaCl2 2, NaHCO3 26, NaH2PO4 1.25, glucose 15; pH 7.6 and 305 mOsm. The pH was kept at 7.4 by bubbling with 95% O2 and 5% CO2. The nose was dissected out en bloc. The olfactory epithelium attached to the nasal septum and the dorsal recess was removed and kept in oxygenated Ringer. Right before starting the recording session, the entire epithelium was peeled away from the underlying bone and transferred to a recording chamber with the mucus layer facing up. Oxygenated Ringer was continuously perfused at room temperature.
OSNs' dendritic knobs were visualized through an upright microscope equipped with an Olympus DP72 camera and a 40× water-immersion objective. An extra 2-to-4× magnification was achieved by a magnifying lens in the light path. The GFP+ or tdTomato+ labelled cells were visualized under fluorescent illumination. Superimposition of the fluorescent and bright field images allowed identification of the fluorescent cells under bright field, which directed the recording pipettes. Electrophysiological recordings were controlled by an EPC-10 USB amplifier combined with Patchmaster software (HEKA Electronic, Germany). Perforated patch-clamp was performed on the dendritic knobs by including 260 µM nystatin in the recording pipette, which was filled with the following solution (in mM): KCl 70, KOH 53, methanesulfonic acid 30, EGTA 5, HEPES 10, sucrose 70; pH 7.2 (KOH) and 310 mOsm. The junction potential was approximately 9 mV and was corrected in all experiments off-line. For odorant-induced transduction currents, signals were sampled at 20 kHz. Under voltage-clamp mode, the signals were initially filtered at 10 kHz and then at 2.9 kHz.
A seven-barrel pipette was used to deliver stimuli by pressure ejection through a picospritzer (Pressure System IIe, Toohey Company, Fairfield, NJ, USA). The stimulus electrode was placed approximately 20 µm downstream from the recording site. Distance (approx. 20 µm) and pressure (20 psi) were adjusted in order to minimize mechanical responses [69]. Single odorant stimuli were prepared in 0.5 M solution in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and kept at –20°C. Final solutions were prepared before each experiment by adding Ringer. The odorant mixture consists of 19 compounds in equal molar concentration [40,70]: heptanol, octanol, hexanal, heptanal, octanal, heptanoic acid, octanoic acid, cineole, amyl acetate, (+) limonene, (−) limonene, (+) carvone, (−) carvone, 2-heptanone, anisaldehyde, benzaldehyde, acetophenone, 3-heptanone and ethyl vanilline. Odorant mixture was prepared as a 0.1 M solution in DMSO and kept at −20°C; final solutions at 10−5 M for each odorant were prepared before each experiment by adding Ringer. Forskolin, an activator of adenylyl cyclase, was prepared as a 10 mM stock solution in DMSO. IBMX, an inhibitor of phosphodiesterases, was prepared as a 100 mM stock solution in DMSO. Final solution containing 200 µM of IBMX and 20 µM of forskolin was prepared before each experiment by adding Ringer.
Unless specified, all chemicals were from Sigma-Aldrich (St-Quentin Fallavier, France). Lyral was provided as a generous gift from International Fragrances and Flavors (Dijon, France).
Data were analysed using Fitmaster (HEKA). Maximum amplitude of the response and kinetics characteristics was measured. Dose–response curves were drafted and fitted using Origin software (OriginLabs). Statistical analysis (ANOVA, non-paramteric Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests followed by Mann–Whitney U-tests for two independent samples) were performed using Origin software (OriginLabs).
5.5. NanoString analysis
Total RNA extraction from whole olfactory mucosa was performed as described [71]. One microgram of RNA was used for each assay. Processing of raw counts and determination of differential expression was performed as described [72]. The reference genes used were Omp (NM_011010.2), Gnal (NM_177137.4), Adcy3 (NM_001159537.1), Ano2 (NM_153589.2) and Cnga2 (NM_007724.2). For the list of examined ORs and axon guidance molecules, see the electronic supplementary material, table S2. The raw NanoString counts for the various genes are included in the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We are very grateful to Zhaodai Bai for blastocyst injections; Evelien Vaes for NanoString and statistical analysis; Masayo Omura for providing ISH probes and for constructive discussions; Florian Lindenblatt and Tobias Burbach for technical assistance; and Anne Lefranc for animal care.
Ethics
Mouse experiments were performed in accordance with the German, European and institutional guidelines (K.M.). All procedures were approved by the Université de Bourgogne ethic committee (X.G.). Other mice used in this study were bred and maintained in the Laboratory Animal Facility of Hunter College, CUNY. The Hunter College IACUC approved all procedures. Animal care and procedures were in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NHHS Publication No. [NIH] 85-23) (P.F.).
Authors' contributions
K.M. designed the study, performed laboratory experiments and drafted the manuscript; X.G. performed laboratory experiments and revised the manuscript; P.F. performed laboratory experiments and drafted the manuscript.
Competing interests
We have no competing interests.
Funding
This work was supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and an Innoviris Attract grant (K.M.), the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (X.G.), the Conseil Régional de Bourgogne (X.G.), Research Centers in Minority Institutions Program grant from the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (MD007599) and NIH SC1 GM088114 (P.F).
References
- 1.Buck L, Axel R. 1991. A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell 65, 175–187. (doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90418-X) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mombaerts P. 2004. Genes and ligands for odorant, vomeronasal and taste receptors. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 263–278. (doi:10.1038/nrn1365) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Niimura Y, Matsui A, Touhara K. 2014. Extreme expansion of the olfactory receptor gene repertoire in African elephants and evolutionary dynamics of orthologous gene groups in 13 placental mammals. Genome Res. 24, 1485–1496. (doi:10.1101/gr.169532.113) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Firestein S. 2001. How the olfactory system makes sense of scents. Nature 413, 211–218. (doi:10.1038/35093026) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Feinstein P, Bozza T, Rodriguez I, Vassalli A, Mombaerts P. 2004. Axon guidance of mouse olfactory sensory neurons by odorant receptors and the beta2 adrenergic receptor. Cell 117, 833–846. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.05.013) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Feinstein P, Mombaerts P. 2004. A contextual model for axonal sorting into glomeruli in the mouse olfactory system. Cell 117, 817–831. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.05.011) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chess A, Simon I, Cedar H, Axel R. 1994. Allelic inactivation regulates olfactory receptor gene expression. Cell 78, 823–834. (doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(94)90562-2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mombaerts P. 2004. Odorant receptor gene choice in olfactory sensory neurons: the one receptor-one neuron hypothesis revisited. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14, 31–36. (doi:10.1016/j.conb.2004.01.014) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Buck LB. 1996. Information coding in the vertebrate olfactory system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 19, 517–544. (doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.19.030196.002505) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Serizawa S, Miyamichi K, Nakatani H, Suzuki M, Saito M, Yoshihara Y, Sakano H. 2003. Negative feedback regulation ensures the one receptor-one olfactory neuron rule in mouse. Science 302, 2088–2094. (doi:10.1126/science.1089122) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lewcock JW, Reed RR. 2004. A feedback mechanism regulates monoallelic odorant receptor expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 1069–1074. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0307986100) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Colquitt BM, Markenscoff-Papadimitriou E, Duffie R, Lomvardas S. 2014. Dnmt3a regulates global gene expression in olfactory sensory neurons and enables odorant-induced transcription. Neuron 83, 823–838. (doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.07.013) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dalton RP, Lyons DB, Lomvardas S. 2013. Co-opting the unfolded protein response to elicit olfactory receptor feedback. Cell 155, 321–332. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.033) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lyons DB, Allen WE, Goh T, Tsai L, Barnea G, Lomvardas S. 2013. An epigenetic trap stabilizes singular olfactory receptor expression. Cell 154, 325–336. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.039) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Markenscoff-Papadimitriou E, Allen WE, Colquitt BM, Goh T, Murphy KK, Monahan K, Mosley CP, Ahituv N, Lomvardas S. 2014. Enhancer interaction networks as a means for singular olfactory receptor expression. Cell 159, 543–557. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.033) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mombaerts P. 2006. Axonal wiring in the mouse olfactory system. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 22, 713–737. (doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.012804.093915) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mombaerts P, Wang F, Dulac C, Chao SK, Nemes A, Mendelsohn M, Edmondson J, Axel R. 1996. Visualizing an olfactory sensory map. Cell 87, 675–686. (doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81387-2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nakashima A, et al. 2013. Agonist-independent GPCR activity regulates anterior-posterior targeting of olfactory sensory neurons. Cell 154, 1314–1325. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.033) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jamet S, Bubnell J, Pfister P, Tomoiaga D, Rogers ME, Feinstein P. 2015. In vitro mutational analysis of the β2 adrenergic receptor, an in vivo surrogate odorant receptor. PLoS ONE 10, e0141696 (doi:10.10.1371/journal.pone.0141696) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Imai T, Suzuki M, Sakano H. 2006. Odorant receptor-derived cAMP signals direct axonal targeting. Science 314, 657–661. (doi:10.1126/science.1131794) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Serizawa S, Miyamichi K, Takeuchi H, Yamagishi Y, Suzuki M, Sakano H. 2006. A neuronal identity code for the odorant receptor-specific and activity-dependent axon sorting. Cell 127, 1057–1069. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.031) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kaneko-Goto T, Yoshihara S, Miyazaki H, Yoshihara Y. 2008. BIG-2 mediates olfactory axon convergence to target glomeruli. Neuron 57, 834–846. (doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.023) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sakano H. 2010. Neural map formation in the mouse olfactory system. Neuron 67, 530–542. (doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.07.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Takeuchi H, et al. 2010. Sequential arrival and graded secretion of Sema3F by olfactory neuron axons specify map topography at the bulb. Cell 141, 1056–1067. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.041) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cho JH, Kam JW, Cloutier JF. 2012. Slits and Robo-2 regulate the coalescence of subsets of olfactory sensory neuron axons within the ventral region of the olfactory bulb. Dev. Biol. 371, 269–279. (doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.08.028) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cho JH, Lepine M, Andrews W, Parnavelas J, Cloutier JF. 2007. Requirement for Slit-1 and Robo-2 in zonal segregation of olfactory sensory neuron axons in the main olfactory bulb. J. Neurosci. 27, 9094–9104. (doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2217-07.2007) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen M et al. 2005. Increased glucose tolerance and reduced adiposity in the absence of fasting hypoglycemia in mice with liver-specific Gs alpha deficiency. J. Clin. Invest. 115, 3217–3227. (doi:10.1172/JCI24196) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hirata T, Nakazawa M, Yoshihara S, Miyachi H, Kitamura K, Yoshihara Y, Hibi M. 2006. Zinc-finger gene Fez in the olfactory sensory neurons regulates development of the olfactory bulb non-cell-autonomously. Development 133, 1433–1443. (doi:10.1242/dev.02329) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Berlot CH. 2002. A highly effective dominant negative αs construct containing mutations that affect distinct functions inhibits multiple Gs-coupled receptor signaling pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 21 080–21 085. (doi:10.1074/jbc.M201330200) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhao H, Reed RR. 2001. X inactivation of the OCNC1 channel gene reveals a role for activity-dependent competition in the olfactory system. Cell 104, 651–660. (doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00262-8) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zheng C, Feinstein P, Bozza T, Rodriguez I, Mombaerts P. 2000. Peripheral olfactory projections are differentially affected in mice deficient in a cyclic nucleotide-gated channel subunit. Neuron 26, 81–91. (doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81140-X) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Livet J, Weissman TA, Kang H, Draft RW, Lu J, Bennis RA, Sanes JR, Lichtman JW. 2007. Transgenic strategies for combinatorial expression of fluorescent proteins in the nervous system. Nature 450, 56–62. (doi:10.1038/nature06293) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Soriano P. 1999. Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain. Nat. Genet. 21, 70–71. (doi:10.1038/5007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Connelly T, Savigner A, Ma M. 2013. Spontaneous and sensory-evoked activity in mouse olfactory sensory neurons with defined odorant receptors. J. Neurophysiol. 110, 55–62. (doi:10.1152/jn.00910.2012) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Grosmaitre X, Vassalli A, Mombaerts P, Shepherd GM, Ma M. 2006. Odorant responses of olfactory sensory neurons expressing the odorant receptor MOR23: a patch clamp analysis in gene-targeted mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 1970–1975. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0508491103) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rovati GE, Capra V, Neubig RR. 2007. The highly conserved DRY motif of class A G protein-coupled receptors: beyond the ground state. Mol. Pharmacol. 71, 959–964. (doi:10.1124/mol.106.029470) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Franke RR, Konig B, Sakmar TP, Khorana HG, Hofmann KP. 1990. Rhodopsin mutants that bind but fail to activate transducin. Science 250, 123–125. (doi:10.1126/science.2218504) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tchernychev B, et al. 2010. Discovery of a CXCR4 agonist pepducin that mobilizes bone marrow hematopoietic cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 22 255–22 259. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1009633108) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ebrahimi FA, Chess A. 2000. Olfactory neurons are interdependent in maintaining axonal projections. Curr. Biol. 10, 219–222. (doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00342-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Omura M, Grosmaitre X, Ma M, Mombaerts P. 2014. The beta2-adrenergic receptor as a surrogate odorant receptor in mouse olfactory sensory neurons. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 58, 1–10. (doi:10.1016/j.mcn.2013.10.010) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nguyen MQ, Zhou Z, Marks CA, Ryba NJ, Belluscio L. 2007. Prominent roles for odorant receptor coding sequences in allelic exclusion. Cell 131, 1009–1017. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.050) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fleischmann A, et al. 2008. Mice with a ‘monoclonal nose’: perturbations in an olfactory map impair odor discrimination. Neuron 60, 1068–1081. (doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.046) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Fleischmann A, Abdus-Saboor I, Sayed A, Shykind B. 2013. Functional interrogation of an odorant receptor locus reveals multiple axes of transcriptional regulation. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001568 (doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001568) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Vassalli A, Rothman A, Feinstein P, Zapotocky M, Mombaerts P. 2002. Minigenes impart odorant receptor-specific axon guidance in the olfactory bulb. Neuron 35, 681–696. (doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00793-6) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wang SS, Lewcock JW, Feinstein P, Mombaerts P, Reed RR. 2004. Genetic disruptions of O/E2 and O/E3 genes reveal involvement in olfactory receptor neuron projection. Development 131, 1377–1388. (doi:10.1242/dev.01009) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hanchate NK, Kondoh K, Lu Z, Kuang D, Ye X, Qiu X, Pachter L, Trapnell C, Buck LB. 2015. Single-cell transcriptomics reveals receptor transformations during olfactory neurogenesis. Science 350, 1251–1255. (doi:10.1126/science.aad2456) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gregersen LH, Schueler M, Munschauer M, Mastrobuoni G, Chen W, Kempa S, Dieterich C, Landthaler M. 2014. MOV10 Is a 5' to 3' RNA helicase contributing to UPF1 mRNA target degradation by translocation along 3' UTRs. Mol. Cell 54, 573–585. (doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2014.03.017) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Belluscio L, Gold GH, Nemes A, Axel R. 1998. Mice deficient in G(olf) are anosmic. Neuron 20, 69–81. (doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80435-3) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zou DJ, Chesler A, Firestein S. 2009. How the olfactory bulb got its glomeruli: a just so story? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 611–618. (doi:10.1038/nrn2666) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Reisert J. 2010. Origin of basal activity in mammalian olfactory receptor neurons. J. Gen. Physiol. 136, 529–540. (doi:10.1085/jgp.201010528) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Bozza T, Vassalli A, Fuss S, Zhang JJ, Weiland B, Pacifico R, Feinstein P, Mombaerts P. 2009. Mapping of class I and class II odorant receptors to glomerular domains by two distinct types of olfactory sensory neurons in the mouse. Neuron 61, 220–233. (doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.11.010) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Tsai L, Barnea G. 2014. A critical period defined by axon-targeting mechanisms in the murine olfactory bulb. Science 344, 197–200. (doi:10.1126/science.1248806) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ma L, Wu Y, Qiu Q, Scheerer H, Moran A, Yu CR. 2014. A developmental switch of axon targeting in the continuously regenerating mouse olfactory system. Science 344, 194–197. (doi:10.1126/science.1248805) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Col JA, Matsuo T, Storm DR, Rodriguez I. 2007. Adenylyl cyclase-dependent axonal targeting in the olfactory system. Development 134, 2481–2489. (doi:10.1242/dev.006346) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zou DJ, Chesler AT, Le Pichon CE, Kuznetsov A, Pei X, Hwang EL, Firestein S. 2007. Absence of adenylyl cyclase 3 perturbs peripheral olfactory projections in mice. J. Neurosci. 27, 6675–6683. (doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0699-07.2007) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Chesler AT, Zou DJ, Le Pichon CE, Peterlin ZA, Matthews GA, Pei X, Miller MC, Firestein S. 2007. A G protein/cAMP signal cascade is required for axonal convergence into olfactory glomeruli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 1039–1044. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0609215104) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Barnea G, O'Donnell S, Mancia F, Sun X, Nemes A, Mendelsohn M, Axel R. 2004. Odorant receptors on axon termini in the brain. Science 304, 1468 (doi:10.1126/science.1096146) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Richard M, Jamet S, Fouquet C, Dubacq C, Boggetto N, Pincet F, Gourier C, Trembleau A. 2013. Homotypic and heterotypic adhesion induced by odorant receptors and the beta2-adrenergic receptor. PLoS ONE 8, e80100 (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080100) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Nyabi O, et al. 2009. Efficient mouse transgenesis using Gateway-compatible ROSA26 locus targeting vectors and F1 hybrid ES cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, e55 (doi:10.1093/nar/gkp112) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bunting M, Bernstein KE, Greer JM, Capecchi MR, Thomas KR. 1999. Targeting genes for self-excision in the germ line. Genes Dev. 13, 1524–1528. (doi:10.1101/gad.13.12.1524) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Graziano MP, Gilman AG. 1989. Synthesis in Escherichia coli of GTPase-deficient mutants of Gs alpha. J. Biol. Chem. 264, 15 475–15 482. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Lakso M, Pichel JG, Gorman JR, Sauer B, Okamoto Y, Lee E, Alt FW, Westphal H. 1996. Efficient in vivo manipulation of mouse genomic sequences at the zygote stage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 5860–5865. (doi:10.1073/pnas.93.12.5860) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Goedhart J, van Weeren L, Hink MA, Vischer NO, Jalink K, Gadella TW Jr. 2010. Bright cyan fluorescent protein variants identified by fluorescence lifetime screening. Nat. Methods 7, 137–139. (doi:10.1038/nmeth.1415) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Madisen L, et al. 2010. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat. Neurosci 13, 133–140. (doi:10.1038/nn.2467) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Li J, Ishii T, Feinstein P, Mombaerts P. 2004. Odorant receptor gene choice is reset by nuclear transfer from mouse olfactory sensory neurons. Nature 428, 393–399. (doi:10.1038/nature02433) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Wen S, Gotze IN, Mai O, Schauer C, Leinders-Zufall T, Boehm U. 2011. Genetic identification of GnRH receptor neurons: a new model for studying neural circuits underlying reproductive physiology in the mouse brain. Endocrinology 152, 1515–1526. (doi:10.1210/en.2010-1208) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ishii T, Omura M, Mombaerts P. 2004. Protocols for two- and three-color fluorescent RNA in situ hybridization of the main and accessory olfactory epithelia in mouse. J. Neurocytol. 33, 657–669. (doi:10.1007/s11068-005-3334-y) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Cadiou H, Aoude I, Tazir B, Molinas A, Fenech C, Meunier N, Grosmaitre X. 2014. Postnatal odorant exposure induces peripheral olfactory plasticity at the cellular level. J. Neurosci. 34, 4857–4870. (doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0688-13.2014) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Grosmaitre X, Santarelli LC, Tan J, Luo M, Ma M. 2007. Dual functions of mammalian olfactory sensory neurons as odor detectors and mechanical sensors. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 348–354. (doi:10.1038/nn1856) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Grosmaitre X, Fuss SH, Lee AC, Adipietro KA, Matsunami H, Mombaerts P, Ma M. 2009. SR1, a mouse odorant receptor with an unusually broad response profile. J. Neurosci. 29, 14 545–14 552. (doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2752-09.2009) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Khan M, Vaes E, Mombaerts P. 2011. Regulation of the probability of mouse odorant receptor gene choice. Cell 147, 907–921. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.049) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Vaes E, Khan M, Mombaerts P. 2014. Statistical analysis of differential gene expression relative to a fold change threshold on NanoString data of mouse odorant receptor genes. BMC Bioinform. 15, 39 (doi:10.1186/1471-2105-15-39) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.