Abstract
During preconditioning, exposure to a non-lethal harmful stimulus triggers a body-wide increase of survival and pro-regenerative programmes that enable the organism to better withstand the deleterious effects of subsequent injuries. This phenomenon has first been described in the mammalian heart, where it leads to a reduction of infarct size and limits the dysfunction of the injured organ. Despite its important clinical outcome, the actual mechanisms underlying preconditioning-induced cardioprotection remain unclear. Here, we describe two independent models of cardiac preconditioning in the adult zebrafish. As noxious stimuli, we used either a thoracotomy procedure or an induction of sterile inflammation by intraperitoneal injection of immunogenic particles. Similar to mammalian preconditioning, the zebrafish heart displayed increased expression of cardioprotective genes in response to these stimuli. As zebrafish cardiomyocytes have an endogenous proliferative capacity, preconditioning further elevated the re-entry into the cell cycle in the intact heart. This enhanced cycling activity led to a long-term modification of the myocardium architecture. Importantly, the protected phenotype brought beneficial effects for heart regeneration within one week after cryoinjury, such as a more effective cell-cycle reentry, enhanced reactivation of embryonic gene expression at the injury border, and improved cell survival shortly after injury. This study reveals that exposure to antecedent stimuli induces adaptive responses that render the fish more efficient in the activation of the regenerative programmes following heart damage. Our results open a new field of research by providing the adult zebrafish as a model system to study remote cardiac preconditioning.
Keywords: myocardium, cardiomyocyte, non-mammalian animal model, heart regeneration, thoracotomy, zymosan
1. Introduction
‘Was mich nicht umbringt, macht mich stärker’. (What does not kill me makes me stronger.) This statement from the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900) is a nearly prefect definition of the intriguing phenomenon referred to as preconditioning. It is more formally described as the induction of cellular survival and pro-regenerative programmes by transient exposure to non-lethal noxious stimuli, which increase the resistance of tissues to further harmful injuries. This physiological adaptation of tissues to subsequent damage was discovered three decades ago in the heart [1] but has in the meantime been described in a large variety of mammalian tissues, such as liver, kidney, skeletal muscle and nervous system [2,3]. Numerous studies performed on mammalian models of myocardial infarction have shown that subjecting hearts to ischaemic preconditioning before ventricular infarction led to a reduction of the myocardial infarct size and to a better recovery of cardiac function [4].
At first, a preconditioning effect was obtained by exposing heart to four brief episodes of coronary occlusion interspersed with reperfusion periods. The transposition of preconditioning into clinics has been possible thanks to the development of non-invasive cardiac preconditioning strategies using remote stimuli, such as the application of cycles of inflation–deflation using a blood pressure cuff placed on the upper arm [5,6]. Since then, multiple alternative triggers not based on ischaemia have been proposed, including peripheral nociception (topical application of capsaicin or surgical skin incision) and direct and transcutaneous nerve stimulation (electroacupuncture) [7]. These findings suggest that preconditioning-induced protective programmes can be activated in an inter-organ response to a wide range of transient aversive stimuli.
The mechanisms underlying the transport of the cardioprotective signal from the preconditioned tissue to the target organ remain unclear, but include both humoral and neural aspects [7,8]. Several studies have implicated a blood-borne factor as a mediator of cardioprotection. Indeed, the protected phenotype can be transferred from a preconditioned to a non-preconditioned individual via blood transfusion. This concept of a humoral signal transfer has been reproduced in several mammalian species, such as rabbit, rat and pigs [9–13]. Even though several factors, such as bradykinin, adenosine, SDF-1α or endocannabinoids, have been proposed, the identity of the humoral mediators of cardioprotection remains unclear [4,7,8]. The second aspect, namely the neural hypothesis, postulates that the preconditioned tissue produces factors that act locally to activate sensory afferent neurons and initiate the cardioprotective programmes [7,8]. In fact, nerve transection has been reported to abolish preconditioning-induced cardioprotection [14], while a direct stimulation of the sensory nerve reproduced the protected phenotype observed after preconditioning [15,16].
The protected phenotype after ischaemic preconditioning appears in two subsequent waves. The first one, the acute form, confers immediate cardioprotection, but its effects fade within 4 h. The second wave appears after 24 h, and lasts for several days. This delayed cardioprotection relies on the increased expression of protective proteins, while acute cardioprotection involves the recruitment of available signalling modules [17]. Preconditioning has raised an important clinical interest and has led to the publication of a large number of studies, identifying over 100 different signalling molecules and mechanisms. Acute cardioprotective pathways, which include NO/PKG, SAFE (STAT3/5 activation) or RISK pathway (PI3K, Akt, ERK activation), converge at the mitochondria, pointing to this organelle as a key effector of early cardioprotection [18]. The transcriptional upregulation of cardioprotective proteins observed during delayed cardioprotection is initiated by at least two signalling pathways that act in parallel: the PKCɛ/NF-κB and SAFE pathways [17,19].
Remarkably, preconditioning has also been reported in fish, such as rainbow trout and Atlantic cod, suggesting a common evolutionary origin of this phenomenon in vertebrates [20]. Over the last decade, the zebrafish has proved itself to be an extremely interesting model to study heart regeneration. In contrast to mammals, zebrafish cardiomyocytes (CMs) remain responsive to mitogenic signals throughout their life. This provides an efficient mechanism of regeneration after injury, leading to a full cardiac recovery within 30–60 days. Despite its high clinical interest, the cardioprotective mechanisms triggered by preconditioning have never been addressed using the zebrafish as a model system.
In this study, we described two independent models of cardiac preconditioning in the adult zebrafish. We used either a skin incision of the thorax (thoracotomy) or sterile inflammation in the peritoneum as the preconditioning stimulus. In contrast to mammalian models, preconditioning promoted the re-entry of cardiac cells into the cell cycle and led to a modification of the ventricular architecture. In addition, we observed an induction of more classical cardioprotective programmes in the epicardium shortly after the preconditioning stimulus. Remarkably, fish preconditioned a few days before heart injury exhibited an accelerated regeneration, illustrated by an increased rate of re-entry of CMs into the cell cycle, more CM dedifferentiation and better cell survival.
2. Material and methods
2.1. Animal procedures
This work was performed with fully grown adult fish at the age of 12–24 months. Wild-type fish were AB (Oregon), transgenic fish lines were cmlc2:DsRed2-nuc [21] and cmlc2:EGFP [22]. The control and preconditioned animals for each experiment were siblings that were maintained in the same density and food conditions. Before every procedure, fish were anaesthetized with tricaine (Sigma-Aldrich). To perform thoracotomy, fish were placed ventral side up on a damp sponge and a small incision was made through the thorax skin with iridectomy scissors. The peritoneal injections were performed by injection of 2 µl of solution into the abdomen of the fish using a glass microcapillary connected to the Femtojet transjector (Eppendorf). The lipopolysaccharides (LPS; Sigma-Aldrich) and Zymosan (Sigma-Aldrich) were injected at a concentration of 10 mg ml−1 in Hank's solution (20 µg of immunogenic particles injected per fish). Cryoinjuries were performed as described previously [23,24]. For bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation experiments, the animals were maintained in 5 mg ml−1 BrdU (B5002; Sigma-Aldrich) for 7 or 30 days. During all treatments, fish were fed and solutions were changed every third day.
2.2. Immunohistochemistry and histology
At the end of each experiment, the hearts were collected and fixed overnight at 4°C in 2% paraformaldehyde. They were then rinsed in PBS and equilibrated in 30% sucrose before embedding in Tissue-Tek OCT compound (Sakura Finetek Europe B.V.) and cryo-sectioned at a thickness of 16 µm. The immunohistochemistry procedures were performed as previously described [23]. The following primary antibodies were used: rabbit anti-MCM5 at 1 : 5000 (kindly provided by Soojin Ryu, Heidelberg), mouse anti-p-Histone 3 at 1 : 200 (Millipore, Clone 3H10), rabbit anti-Mef2 at 1 : 100 (Santa Cruz Biotech SC-313), rabbit anti-DsRed (Clonetech, 632496) at 1 : 200 and rat anti-BrdU at 1 : 100 (Abcam, ab6326). To visualize the cardiac muscle, sections were incubated for 30 min with Phalloidin-Atto 647N (Sigma-Aldrich) at a dilution of 1 : 500. For the BrdU immunostaining, the slides were incubated in 2 M HCl in PBS with 0.3% Triton-X for 45 min before the immunohistochemistry procedure. The Alexa-Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch) were used at 1 : 500, and DAPI was used at 1 : 2000. Haematoxylin and eosin (H & E) staining was performed as previously described [15].
2.3. TUNEL assay
For TUNEL reactions, the cryosections were postfixed for 10 min in 1% formalin, washed twice for 5 min in PBS and pretreated in precooled ethanol : acetic acid 2 : 1 for 5 min at −20°C. After washing in PBS, DNA breaks were elongated with Terminal Transferase (Roche) and Digoxigenin-dUTP solution (Roche) as described previously [25]. The reaction was stopped by incubation in 300 mM NaCl, 30 mM sodium citrate for 10 min, followed by washing in PBS. The staining with fluorescein conjugated anti-digoxigenin was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol (Roche).
2.4. Image analysis and quantification
After antibody staining, cardiac tissue imaging was performed at 20× magnification with confocal microscopes (Leica TCS-SP5 and Leica TCS-SPE-II). At least three different pictures were taken for each heart. Here, n represents the number of fish used in the experiment. ImageJ software was used to perform the subsequent image analysis. The number of proliferating non-CM nuclei was obtained by subtracting the number of cmlc2:DsRed2-nuc-positive nuclei from the total number of nuclei. To quantify the number of proliferating nuclei, the images of cell-cycle markers (MCM5, PH3, BrdU) were superimposed with the images of nuclei markers (DAPI, cmlc2:DsRed2-nuc, Mef2). The number of apoptotic nuclei was assessed by the superimposition of DAPI with the TUNEL labelling. To define the average myocardium thickness per section, we selected ventricles of a similar shape and size for control and preconditioning groups. We measured the thickness of the compact myocardium at four positions at the up, right, down and left side for each of the ventricular sections. The positions were selected at places where the compact and the trabecular myocardiums were clearly segregated and where the thickness of the compact myocardium was representative of the neighbouring positions. The average value of these measurements was then normalized to the maximal myocardial length. All results are expressed as the mean ± s.e. of the mean. Unless specified, p-values were obtained by performing the t-test.
2.5. In situ hybridization
Several digoxigenin-labelled RNA antisense probes were generated by PCR amplification of specific cardiac cDNA sequences. The forward (F) and reverse (R) primers are listed in table 1. The reverse primers were synthesized with the addition of T3 polymerase. After hybridization, the probes were detected by the use of anti-digoxigenin AP-conjugated antibody (Dig labeling system, Roche).
Table 1.
application | gene | gene ID | forward primer 5′->3′ | reverse primer 5′->3′ | product length |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
qRT-PCR | b-actin | ENSDARG00000037870 | TTGGCAATGAGAGGTTCAGG | TGGAGTTGAAGGTGGTCTCG | 55 bp |
hmox1a | ENSDART00000030890 | GCTCAGCTACCAGAAAGGACAG | CTGTCCAGCTCTTCCTCCAG | 99 bp | |
hspa5 | ENSDART00000169404 | TCTCCACTGCTTCCGACAAC | CAGATGGTTGTCTTTGGTCAGG | 88 bp | |
in situ | txn | ENSDART00000064789 | GCTCAAACGACACACGAGC | GTTTTCATTTCATACAAAGCCAACA | 643 bp |
cxcl12a | ENSDART00000053946 | AGTTCCTCCACACACCCAAC | AAACACGGAGCAAACAGGAC | 452 bp |
2.6. Quantitative real-time PCR
RNA was extracted according to the Trizol reagent manual (Life Technologies) with the use of MaXtract High Density tubes. cDNA was synthesized with the Super-Script-II Reverse-Transcriptase (Invitrogen) using 1.5 µg of RNA. The primers used for different amplifications are listed in table 1.
3. Results
3.1. Thoracotomy is sufficient to induce cardiomyocyte re-entry into the cell cycle
Previous studies in the zebrafish have shown that CM proliferation is strongly induced in surgically damaged heart after either amputation or cryoinjury [23,24,26,27]. In both injury models, the first procedure is an incision into the thoracic cavity to gain access to the heart [24]. Interestingly, our data showed that the initial surgical manoeuvre by itself is sufficient to stimulate the entry of CMs into the cell cycle, even when it was not followed by heart injury [23]. This suggests that the regenerative programme of zebrafish CMs could be markedly activated by a noxious stimulus. Accordingly, we hypothesized that thoracotomy may represent a preconditioning model, in which chest injury is sufficient to elicit an activation of the heart in the absence of any myocardial damage. Upon completion of the thoracic incision, the chest is not sewn but left for spontaneous healing. Remarkably, re-epithelialization of the wound took place within three days, while underlying connective tissue healed in approximately one week (electronic supplementary material, figure S1).
First, we aimed to reproduce our initial observation that thoracotomy is sufficient by itself to induce the re-entry of CMs into the cell cycle. For this purpose, immunohistochemistry against minichromosome maintenance complex component 5 (MCM5), a marker of G1/S phase [28], was performed to quantify the entry of CMs into the cell cycle (figure 1a,b,e). To distinguish CM from non-CM nuclei, we used cmlc2:DsRed2-nuc fish, which express a nuclear form of DsRed under the control of the cardiac myosin light chain 2 promoter. In control uninjured fully grown zebrafish, the ratio of MCM5-positive CMs ranges from 0.1 to 0.5%. Remarkably, at 7 days post-thoracotomy (dpt), about 5% of CMs were cycling. Proliferation of non-CM nuclei was similarly enhanced, with a 10-fold increase in MCM5-positive non-CM nuclei (figure 1f). To confirm these results, we used BrdU as a second cell-cycle marker. Fish were immersed in BrdU for 7 days following thoracotomy. Consistently, a sixfold increase in BrdU-positive CM and non-CM nuclei was detected at 7 dpt (figure 1c,d,g,h). Taken together, these observations indicate that the systemic reaction which is set in motion by the thoracotomy procedure elicits a global increase in the cell-cycling activity of the zebrafish heart.
Then, the progression of the CM cell cycle was analysed. CMs can undergo DNA replication without completing their cell cycle. In humans, polyploidization occurs during postnatal growth and in response to myocardial stress [29]. To test whether the dividing CMs generated after thoracic incision entered mitosis, we used phospho-(Ser10)-histone H3 (PH3) as a marker of condensed chromosomes [30]. A sevenfold increase in the number of PH3-positive CM nuclei was observed at 7 dpt (figure 2b), while a ninefold increase was detected for non-CM nuclei (figure 2c). Clear examples of CM nuclear division were detected (figure 2a), indicating that thoracotomy leads to the formation of new CM nuclei.
To determine whether the enhanced CM mitotic activity was associated with dedifferentiation, we assessed the expression of embryonic isoform of cardiac myosin heavy chain (embCMHC), which has been shown to demarcate the margin of the remaining myocardium in the vicinity of the damaged tissue after amputation or cryoinjury [31]. The immunofluorescence analysis revealed that embCMHC was not induced after thoracotomy (data not shown). This result suggests that MCM5-positive CMs of the preconditioned hearts do not markedly revert to the immature state, which would facilitate cardiogenesis.
Next, we investigated whether the increased cycling activity observed in the absence of heart injury was followed by an elimination of supernumerary cells by apoptosis. TUNEL staining was performed at different time points after thoracic incision (4, 7, 14, 21 and 30 dpt), and at 4 days post-cryoinjury (dpci) as a positive control (figure 2d–g). Although an increased cell death was detected at 4 dpci, no difference was noticed between uninjured and thoracic-wounded animals, indicating that the induction of proliferation does not concur with an increased apoptosis and confirming that the thoracotomy procedure did not damage the cardiac tissue.
3.2. Thoracotomy induces architectural modifications of the myocardium
To test whether the proliferative response observed at 7 dpt was a lasting phenomenon, we immersed fish in BrdU for one month and assessed the profile of cycling CMs (figure 3a,b). We identified a fivefold increase in the number of BrdU-positive CMs at 30 dpt compared to 7 dpt (figure 3f). These results indicate that thoracotomy opens a long-term proliferative window in the zebrafish heart.
The zebrafish ventricle is composed of two distinct compartments: a dense cortical layer (compact myocardium) which surrounds a spongy inner structure (trabecular myocardium; figure 3e) [32]. We hypothesized that the proliferation induced after thoracotomy might not be evenly scattered through both myocardial compartments. To test this hypothesis, the spatial distribution of BrdU-positive CMs was characterized in fish treated with BrdU for 30 days. The CMs that entered the cell cycle during the month following thoracotomy were mainly located in the compact myocardium (figure 3g), confirming the result obtained at 7 dpt for MCM5-positive CMs (electronic supplementary material, figure S2).
Next, we asked if the observed increase in CM proliferation induced any long-term effect on the myocardium architecture. To this aim, we stained heart sections with Phalloidin, which binds to F-actin fibres present in muscle, and we quantified diverse morphometric parameters at 30 dpt (figure 3c,d,h–j). While the maximal heart length was unchanged (figure 3h), the thickness of the compact myocardium was increased at one month after thoracotomy (figure 3i). In addition, the number of CM nuclei per square micrometre was larger after thoracotomy (figure 3j). This increase was higher in the compact myocardium than in the trabecular compartment, supporting the notion that new CMs accumulate in the compact myocardium after thoracotomy and lead to a thickening of this outer myocardial compartment.
3.3. Intraperitoneal injection of immunogenic particles induced cardiomyocyte re-entry into the cell cycle
Even though no heart injury could be detected, we cannot exclude that the enhanced mitotic activity observed after thoracotomy might be triggered by a direct stimulation of the cardiac tissues by the osmotic or the mechanical stress created by the thoracic incision and not simply by the preconditioning stimulus. To test this possibility, we developed a second model of cardiac preconditioning using another remote stimulus. Specifically, an intraperitoneal (IP) inflammation was induced by a single injection of either immunogenic lipopolysaccharides (LPS) or Zymosan. LPS simulate a Gram-negative infection, whereas Zymosan mimics a fungal infection [33]. Outstandingly, at 7 days post injection (dpi), cell-cycle activity was enhanced in LPS- and Zymosan-injected fish, as compared to control fish injected with Hank's buffer (figure 4a–f), reaching levels similar to those observed after thoracotomy (figure 4a–f). Similar to the thoracotomy model, we assessed the spatial distribution of cycling CMs after the induction of a peritoneal sterile inflammation. In contrast to the thoracotomy model, MCM5-positive CMs were located throughout the whole heart of LPS- and Zymosan-injected fish (figure 4f).
3.4. Intraperitoneal injection of immunogenic particles stimulated thickening of the compact myocardium
Then, we analysed the long-term effect of a single IP injection of either LPS or Zymosan on the myocardium architecture. Again, we stained heart sections with Phalloidin and quantified diverse morphometric parameters at 30 dpi (figure 5). Similar to thoracotomy, the maximal heart length was unchanged (figure 5d), but the thickness of the compact myocardium was increased (figure 5e). The analysis of cmlc2:DsRed-nuc transgenic fish revealed that a densification of CM nuclei in cardiac muscle was only detected in the compact myocardium at 30 dpt (figure 5f). In the trabecular myocardium, we observed that the muscle surface relative to the heart length (Phalloidin-positive area per maximal heart length) was increased in heart preconditioned with IP injection of LPS or Zymosan (data not shown). We did not notice the same phenomenon after thoracotomy (data not shown). This additional aspect of hearts preconditioned with a single IP injection of LPS or Zymosan indicates that architectural modifications might take place also in the trabecular myocardium in this model.
Taken together, our results show that similar phenotypic manifestations are observed after thoracotomy or IP injection of immunogenic particles, suggesting that both procedures trigger the activation of the similar molecular cascades.
3.5. Cardioprotective genes are expressed in the epicardium after thoracotomy
To determine whether thoracotomy induces phenotypes similar to those seen after ischaemic preconditioning, we tested the expression of several cardioprotective genes known to be induced by preconditioning in mammalian models. Thioredoxin plays a crucial role in the cellular defence against reactive oxygen species after ischaemic preconditioning [34], while CXCL12 (also known as SDF-1α) and its receptor CXCR4 are activated in response to preconditioning and promote cardiac protection against ischaemia/reperfusion damage [35]. The expression of their zebrafish orthologues (txn, cxcl12a, cxcl12b) was tested by in situ hybridization at 1 dpt. Interestingly, both txn and cxcl12a transcripts were upregulated in the epicardium at 1 day after the preconditioning stimulus (figure 6a–d). By contrast, we did not detect any change in the expression of cxcl12b (data not shown). Importantly, txn and cxcl12a were similarly upregulated in the epicardium after zymosan injection (data not shown). Next, we tested the expression of two heat-shock proteins induced after ischaemic preconditioning in rodents. The inability of hmox1 knock-out mice to respond to preconditioning has highlighted the key role of this heat-shock protein in cardioprotection [36]. Other studies in rats have established an important role for HSPA5 (also known as GRP-78) in the protection of CMs against ATP depletion and oxidative stress after ischaemic preconditioning [37]. By qRT-PCR, we observed an increased expression of the zebrafish orthologues of these two heat-shock proteins, namely hmox1a and hspa5, shortly after the preconditioning stimulus at 1 dpt (figure 6e,f). Taken together, these results suggest that similar cardioprotective mechanisms are at stake in the adult zebrafish heart after thoracotomy and in mammalian ischaemic preconditioning models.
3.6. Subsequent preconditioning stimuli have additive effects
Next, we asked whether myocardial cell-cycle activity could be further boosted when two distinct preconditioning stimuli were combined. Accordingly, we performed an IP injection of Zymosan at 3 days before the thoracotomy procedure and, subsequently, assessed the rate of dividing CMs in the ventricle at 7 dpt (figure 7c). Remarkably, the percentage of MCM5-positive CMs increased by 3.6-fold when a single IP-injection of Zymosan was combined with thoracotomy, when compared with a control injection followed by thoracotomy (figure 7a,b,d). Our results demonstrate that two distinct non-lethal harmful stimuli have additive effects on the rate of cell-cycle re-entry of CMs and suggest that these procedures could be used as effective preconditioning stimuli before heart injury.
3.7. Using thoracotomy as a preconditioning stimulus in the adult zebrafish enhances regenerative programmes
To validate thoracotomy and IP injection of immunogenic particles as proper models of cardiac preconditioning in the zebrafish, we subjected fish to these non-lethal harmful stimuli a few days before wounding their hearts. In contrast to mammals, zebrafish are able to fully regenerate their heart following injury. Upon wounding, cardiac cells at the injury border reactivate developmental programmes, undergo mitosis and efficiently repopulate the damaged zone [23,26,27,38]. In addition, proliferative programmes are activated within the entire intact myocardium, where CMs distant from the wound enter the cell cycle without undergoing any obvious dedifferentiation [31].
To induce myocardial injury, we used the cryoinjury model, in which approximately 20% of the ventricle is damaged by exposure to a precooled metal probe [24]. Within the first week after the procedure, the initial inflammatory phase is tuned down and a collagenous matrix is deposited in the wounded area, providing a scaffold for the regeneration. By 7 days post-cryoinjury (dpci) the regenerative phase has been clearly initiated, and within four to eight weeks a complete restoration of the cardiac tissue can be observed [23,26,39].
To maximize our chance to detect the effect of preconditioning on heart regeneration in the adult zebrafish, we focused our analysis at 7 dpci. At this time point, most regenerative programmes are active. We subjected fish to thoracotomy either 2 or 7 days before the cryoinjury procedure, referred to as a short-term preconditioning, and assessed CM proliferation in the ventricles at 7 dpci (figure 8a–c). The results were displayed by plotting the percentage of MCM5-positive CM nuclei as a function of the percentage of cryoinjured area for each heart section (figure 8g). We observed that the amount of dividing CMs was proportional to the size of the wound. Remarkably, CMs re-entered the cell cycle more efficiently in preconditioned hearts than in controls (figure 8a,b,g; electronic supplementary material, figure S3b). To confirm our observation of an enhancement of regeneration after preconditioning, we then examined the induction of developmental programmes in CMs in close vicinity to the wound, using embryonic cardiac myosin heavy chain (embCMHC) as a marker of undifferentiated CMs. In control unconditioned hearts, embCMHC staining can be detected starting from 4 dpci, it peaks between 7 and 10 dpci and decreases thereafter as regeneration progresses [31]. In preconditioned hearts, we observed a fourfold increase in the embCMHC staining at 7 dpci (figure 8e,f,h). Our data show a clear acceleration of the heart regeneration in fish preconditioned by thoracotomy a few days before the cryoinjury.
Interestingly, we could not observe a significant difference in the number of cycling CMs or in the size of embCMHC-positive myocardium between hearts preconditioned at 2 or 7 days before cryoinjury (figure 8g; data not shown). These results suggest that preconditioned hearts are able to retain their protected phenotype for at least one week. To test whether preconditioned hearts hold these cardioprotective capacities in the long term, we performed a thoracotomy 30 days before the cryoinjury procedure (electronic supplementary material, figure S4a). This long-term preconditioning did not lead to improvement of the cardiac regeneration as convincingly as that seen when thoracotomy was performed within the week preceding the cryoinjury (electronic supplementary material, figure S4d). The rate of cycling CMs as a function of the size of the wounded area was not higher in preconditioned fish (electronic supplementary material, figure S4b, S4e). Furthermore, no difference between control and preconditioned fish could be observed in the quantity of undifferentiated CMs (electronic supplementary material, figure S4c).
3.8. Using Zymosan intraperitoneal injection as a preconditioning stimulus in the adult zebrafish enhances regenerative programmes
To test whether IP injection of immunogenic particles could also be used to confer cardioprotection before cryoinjury, similar to thoracotomy, we performed a single IP injection of Zymosan at 3 days before the cryoinjury procedure (figure 8d). Again, CMs re-entered the cell cycle more efficiently in preconditioned hearts (figure 8i; electronic supplementary material, figure S3d). The initiation of developmental programmes in CMs at the injury border was stronger after Zymosan injection, as illustrated by a 2.5-fold increase in injury-normalized embCMHC staining (figure 8j). These results also establish IP injection of Zymosan as a valid preconditioning stimulus in the adult zebrafish.
3.9. Preconditioning in the adult zebrafish enhances survival programmes
We noticed that the size of the cryoinjuries tended to be smaller after short-term preconditioning. This observation was mostly striking in our thoracotomy model (figure 8g), where the average cryoinjury covered 36.6 ± 2.6% of the control heart and only 20 ± 2.4% of the preconditioned hearts (electronic supplementary material, figure S3a). A milder phenotype was seen after Zymosan injection (figure 8i; electronic supplementary material, figure S3c). With this procedure, the injured areas represented on average 33 ± 2.4% of the surface of the heart in Hank's-injected fish and 24.4 ± 2.4% in Zymosan-injected specimens. In accordance with our previous results, we found no difference in the size of cryoinjuries after long-term preconditioning (electronic supplementary material, figure S4d). Based on these results, we asked whether preconditioning could promote survival programmes after cryoinjury. For this aim, TUNEL assay was performed at 12 h post-cryoinjury (hpci) in the hearts of control and preconditioned fish (figure 9a,b). Apoptosis was impressively decreased in preconditioned hearts (figure 9c), suggesting that preconditioning efficiently promote survival within a few hours after injury.
4. Discussion
Preconditioning can be considered as an evolutionary adaptation of organisms to activate protective/pro-regenerative programmes upon exposure to mild pathologic perturbations in order to better withstand the deleterious effects of ensuing harsh injuries. In the mammalian heart, short bouts of non-lethal cardiac or non-cardiac insults elicit cytoprotection against subsequent prolonged ischaemia and reperfusion [7]. The preconditioned phenotype is characterized by the elevated expression of pro-angiogenic, antioxidant and cardioprotective genes [17,19,40]. A mechanistic rationale for new drug therapies that mimic these powerful protective responses remains unfortunately still unclear.
In this study, we identified that heart preconditioning also occurs in the adult zebrafish. We described two independent models of remote preconditioning, namely thoracotomy and induction of a sterile IP inflammation. In our first model, a chest incision without heart injury was sufficient to invoke a proliferative phenotype in CMs and non-CMs in the ventricle during the time window of two to three weeks after the procedure. Thus, cardiac remodelling is not restricted to myocytes, but is a general feature of cells that build the fish heart. Remarkably, the CM cell-cycle re-entry as assessed by MCM5 expression was nearly as high as after cryoinjury [23]. However, as opposed to the regenerative process, we did not observe CM dedifferentiation in the preconditioned heart. It is possible that the rate of cardiogenesis is different between mature and immature proliferating CMs in preconditioning and regenerative processes, respectively. Moreover, the enhanced mitotic activity was mainly located in the compact myocardium and led to a thickening of this dense cortical myocardial layer one month after the initial preconditioning stimulus. This architectural alteration can increase the robustness of the heart. It is reasonable to assume that this phenotype is adaptive and renders the organ more resistant to a cardiac muscle injury. Indeed, several studies have identified a leading role of a compact myocardium during heart regeneration after ventricular resection [27,41,42]. Additional benefit of the more robust outer wall would be a limitation of the heart dysfunction immediately after ventricle damage, which enables the fish to better cope with damage. Certainly, the significance of an enlarged compact myocardial layer after thoracotomy requires further investigation. In general, the elucidation of the cytoprotective processes in the zebrafish model may uncover the mechanistic underpinnings for this clinically relevant phenomenon.
Remarkably, we observed a similar phenotype in our second model of cardiac preconditioning. A single IP injection of immunogenic particles led to an increased mitotic activity and to a long-term modification of the heart architecture. After thoracotomy, cycling cells were mainly detected in the compact myocardium, whereas they were scattered throughout the heart after LPS or Zymosan injection. The different localization of cycling cells in the ventricle after thoracic surgery and after the induction of an IP inflammation might result from the spatial pattern of stimuli used. Indeed, in thoracic-wounded fish, the outer surface of the heart is mainly in contact with the aversive stimuli. In fish injected with immunogenic particles, a systemic response appears, which progressively reaches the heart, probably via blood circulation. In this context, the whole myocardium is in contact with the aggressive components. Remarkably, LPS/Zymosan injections activated CM proliferation more selectively than thoracotomy. These finding should be further investigated in additional studies. Despite these variations in the profile of cycling CMs, both models exhibited a thicker compact myocardium, indicating architectural modification of the heart at one month after the preconditioning. The striking resemblance between both models suggests that these two remote preconditioning stimuli trigger the same molecular cascades in the target organ.
Although the mammalian heart studies are predominantly based on mild antecedent ischaemia/reperfusion, remote cardiac preconditioning has also been observed [8]. Similar to thoracotomy, skin incision models as conditioning stimuli have been described in mouse and dog [43,44]. In these models, preconditioning is dependent on skin nociception and on the activation of cardiac sensory and sympathetic nerves. As mammalian adult CMs are poorly responsive to mitogenic signals, the downstream effectors of preconditioning do not involve cell division pathways [19,45]. By contrast, cardiac preconditioning in the zebrafish promoted a hyperplastic growth of the heart. This striking difference between mammalian and teleost models of cardiac preconditioning is most likely due to the remarkable capacities of the zebrafish heart to respond to mitogenic signals throughout ontogenic life. Moreover, our results obtained in the adult zebrafish preconditioned heart are reminiscent of the observations made in mammalian preconditioned kidney or liver, where proliferation can be observed after ischaemic preconditioning [46–48]. In contrast to the adult mammalian heart, these adult tissues are still responsive to mitogenic signals [49,50]. Taken together, these observations emphasize the re-entry into the cell cycle as a classic protective reaction in tissues sensitive to mitogens.
In parallel to an increased cell-cycle activity, we observed an enhanced expression of more classical cardioprotective genes. We tested the expression of four zebrafish orthologues of mammalian genes activated after ischaemic preconditioning, namely txn, cxcl12a, hmox1a and hspa5 [34–37]. All of them were increased 24 h after thoracotomy, suggesting that preconditioning elicits conserved cardioprotective mechanisms through species. Interestingly, our in situ hybridization revealed that txn and cxcl12a expression was restricted to the epicardium. This expression pattern highlights this cardiac compartment as a key mediator of cardioprotection and is consistent with a previous report that has demonstrated that the opening of the pericardial sac is sufficient to induce the expression of raldh2, a marker of the activated epicardium [51]. Thus, the epicardium is a dynamic tissue responsive to changes within the extra-cardiac space. Here, we have demonstrated that the stimulation of this sensitive mesothelial layer coincides with the activation of the CM cell cycle. Even though the capital role played by the epicardium in cardiac regeneration has already been examined in the zebrafish [52–54], further studies are needed to outline its function in the formation of a protected phenotype after preconditioning.
In mammalian models, preconditioning hearts before prolonged ischaemia reduces significantly the resultant infarct size. In contrast to mammals, the zebrafish heart heals naturally after injury within 30–60 days. In an organism in which regeneration is a highly efficient process, one can only expect a modest increase in the speed of recovery. To maximize our chances to see how preconditioning impacts on heart regeneration, we focused our analysis at 7 dpci, when most healing programmes are already induced. Remarkably, we observed a clearly enhanced regeneration in preconditioned hearts at this time point, independently of the used stimuli. The re-entry of CMs into the cell cycle was more efficient and more CMs exhibited hallmarks of dedifferentiation at the injury border. Moreover, we observed less apoptosis in the damaged area of preconditioned hearts shortly after the cryoinjury procedure. We also tried to assess regenerative scores at 30 dpci. Unfortunately, we did not detect a significant improvement of the regenerative status of preconditioned heart versus control at this late stage of cardiac healing. This disappointing outcome might be explained by the high inter-individual variability present during heart regeneration. At 30 dpci, the injured area of control non-preconditioned fish is sometimes almost completely resorbed, but can also still be visible [55,56]. Indeed, the speed of heart regeneration will depend on a large variety of parameters such as the initial size of cryoinjury, the level of stress or the general health status of the fish [56].
Outstandingly, the same cardioprotective capacities were observed in hearts preconditioned at 2 or 7 days before the cryoinjury procedure. By contrast, the protected phenotype was lost when a gap of one month was used between the thoracotomy and the cryoinjury. Taken together, our data indicated that preconditioned hearts are able to retain a stable cardioprotective phenotype for at least one week, regardless of the number of days between the preconditioning and the heart injury.
In summary, we proposed two independent models to study cardiac preconditioning using the adult zebrafish as a model system. In contrast to mammalian models, the increased expression of cardioprotective genes is accompanied by an increased mitotic activity leading to the long-term remodelling of the adult zebrafish myocardium architecture. The demonstration of the cardioprotective effects after heart injury of thoracotomy and IP inflammation validated these procedures as appropriate models for cardiac preconditioning in the zebrafish. Our findings open a new field of research that uses the zebrafish to study the cardiac preconditioning phenomenon. The understanding of how noxious stimuli can invoke subsequent intrinsic cell protective programmes to increase the global cardiac muscle tolerance creates an interesting perspective, which can promote new therapeutic strategies in prevention of ischaemic muscle diseases.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgement
We thank V. Zimmermann for excellent technical assistance and for fish care.
Ethics
The cantonal veterinary office of Fribourg approved this experimental research on animals.
Authors' contributions
A.S.P.C. carried out laboratory work, performed data analysis, designed the study and drafted the manuscript; T.B. carried out laboratory work and performed data analysis; F.B. carried out laboratory work and initiated the study; P.S. performed laboratory work; A.J. conceived the study, designed the study, coordinated the study and helped draft the manuscript. All authors gave final approval for publication.
Competing interests
The authors declare no financial or non-financial competing interests.
Funding
This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation, grant nos. 310030_159995 and CRSII3_147675, and by the Schweizerische Stifung für die Erforschung der Muskelkrankheiten.
References
- 1.Murry CE, Jennings RB, Reimer KA. 1986. Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation 74, 1124–1136. (doi:10.1161/01.CIR.74.5.1124) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Addison PD, Neligan PC, Ashrafpour H, Khan A, Zhong A, Moses M, Forrest CR, Pang CY. 2003. Noninvasive remote ischemic preconditioning for global protection of skeletal muscle against infarction. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 285, H1435–H1443. (doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00106.2003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Peralta C, Serafin A, Fernandez-Zabalegui L, Wu ZY, Rosello-Catafau J. 2003. Liver ischemic preconditioning: a new strategy for the prevention of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Transplant. Proc. 35, 1800–1802. (doi:10.1016/S0041-1345(03)00571-2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gill R, Kuriakose R, Gertz ZM, Salloum FN, Xi L, Kukreja RC. 2014. Remote ischemic preconditioning for myocardial protection: update on mechanisms and clinical relevance. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 402, 41–49. (doi:10.1007/s11010-014-2312-z) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kharbanda RK, et al. 2002. Transient limb ischemia induces remote ischemic preconditioning in vivo. Circulation 106, 2881–2883. (doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000043806.51912.9B) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gunaydin B, Cakici I, Soncul H, Kalaycioglu S, Cevik C, Sancak B, Kanzik I, Karadenizli Y. 2000. Does remote organ ischaemia trigger cardiac preconditioning during coronary artery surgery?. Pharmacol. Res. 41, 493–496. (doi:10.1006/phrs.1999.0611) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Heusch G, Botker HE, Przyklenk K, Redington A, Yellon D. 2015. Remote ischemic conditioning. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 65, 177–195. (doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.10.031) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sivaraman V, Pickard JM, Hausenloy DJ. 2015. Remote ischaemic conditioning: cardiac protection from afar. Anaesthesia 70, 732–748. (doi:10.1111/anae.12973) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Serejo FC, Rodrigues LF Jr, da Silva Tavares KC, de Carvalho AC, Nascimento JH. 2007. Cardioprotective properties of humoral factors released from rat hearts subject to ischemic preconditioning. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 49, 214–220. (doi:10.1097/FJC.0b013e3180325ad9) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Breivik L, Helgeland E, Aarnes EK, Mrdalj J, Jonassen AK. 2011. Remote postconditioning by humoral factors in effluent from ischemic preconditioned rat hearts is mediated via PI3K/Akt-dependent cell-survival signaling at reperfusion. Basic Res. Cardiol. 106, 135–145. (doi:10.1007/s00395-010-0133-0) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shimizu M, et al. 2009. Transient limb ischaemia remotely preconditions through a humoral mechanism acting directly on the myocardium: evidence suggesting cross-species protection. Clin. Sci. 117, 191–200. (doi:10.1042/CS20080523) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dickson EW, Reinhardt CP, Renzi FP, Becker RC, Porcaro WA, Heard SO. 1994. Ischemic preconditioning may be transferable via whole blood transfusion: preliminary evidence. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 8, 123–129. (doi:10.1023/A:1008911101951) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Konstantinov IE, et al. 2004. The remote ischemic preconditioning stimulus modifies inflammatory gene expression in humans. Physiol. Genomics 19, 143–150. (doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00046.2004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Steensrud T, Li J, Dai X, Manlhiot C, Kharbanda RK, Tropak M, Redington A. 2010. Pretreatment with the nitric oxide donor SNAP or nerve transection blocks humoral preconditioning by remote limb ischemia or intra-arterial adenosine. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circul. Physiol. 299, H1598–H1603. (doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00396.2010) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Merlocco AC, et al. 2014. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation as a novel method of remote preconditioning: in vitro validation in an animal model and first human observations. Basic Res. Cardiol. 109, 406 (doi:10.1007/s00395-014-0406-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Redington KL, Disenhouse T, Li J, Wei C, Dai X, Gladstone R, Manlhiot C, Redington AN. 2013. Electroacupuncture reduces myocardial infarct size and improves post-ischemic recovery by invoking release of humoral, dialyzable, cardioprotective factors. J. Physiol. Sci. 63, 219–223. (doi:10.1007/s12576-013-0259-6) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Heusch G. 2014. Molecular basis of cardioprotection: signal transduction in ischemic pre-, post-, and remote conditioning. Circul. Res. 116, 674–699. (doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.305348) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Marin-Garcia J, Goldenthal MJ. 2004. Mitochondria play a critical role in cardioprotection. J. Cardiac Fail. 10, 55–66. (doi:10.1016/S1071-9164(03)00129-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bolli R. 2007. Preconditioning: a paradigm shift in the biology of myocardial ischemia. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circul. Physiol. 292, H19–H27. (doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00712.2006) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gamperl AK, Farrell AP. 2004. Cardiac plasticity in fishes: environmental influences and intraspecific differences. J. Exp. Biol. 207, 2539–2550. (doi:10.1242/jeb.01057) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rottbauer W, et al. 2002. Reptin and pontin antagonistically regulate heart growth in zebrafish embryos. Cell 111, 661–672. (doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01112-1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Burns CG, Milan DJ, Grande EJ, Rottbauer W, MacRae CA, Fishman MC. 2005. High-throughput assay for small molecules that modulate zebrafish embryonic heart rate. Nat. Chem. Biol. 1, 263–264. (doi:10.1038/nchembio732) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chablais F, Veit J, Rainer G, Jazwinska A. 2011. The zebrafish heart regenerates after cryoinjury-induced myocardial infarction. BMC Dev. Biol. 11, 21 (doi:10.1186/1471-213X-11-21) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chablais F, Jazwinska A. 2012. Induction of myocardial infarction in adult zebrafish using cryoinjury. J. Vis. Exp. 62, e3666 (doi:10.3791/3666) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Labat-Moleur F, Guillermet C, Lorimier P, Robert C, Lantuejoul S, Brambilla E, Negoescu A. 1998. TUNEL apoptotic cell detection in tissue sections: critical evaluation and improvement. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 46, 327–334. (doi:10.1177/002215549804600306) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gonzalez-Rosa JM, Martin V, Peralta M, Torres M, Mercader N. 2011. Extensive scar formation and regression during heart regeneration after cryoinjury in zebrafish. Development 138, 1663–1674. (doi:10.1242/dev.060897) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Poss KD, Wilson LG, Keating MT. 2002. Heart regeneration in zebrafish. Science 298, 2188–2190. (doi:10.1126/science.1077857) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Knockleby JW, Lee H. 2010. Same partners, different dance: involvement of DNA replication proteins in centrosome regulation. Cell Cycle 9, 4487–4491. (doi:10.4161/cc.9.22.14047) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Senyo SE, et al. 2013. Mammalian heart renewal by pre-existing cardiomyocytes. Nature 493, 433–436. (doi:10.1038/nature11682) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hans F, Dimitrov S. 2001. Histone H3 phosphorylation and cell division. Oncogene 20, 3021–3027. (doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1204326) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sallin P, de Preux Charles AS, Duruz V, Pfefferli C, Jazwinska A. 2014. A dual epimorphic and compensatory mode of heart regeneration in zebrafish. Dev. Biol. 399, 27–40. (doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.12.002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gupta V, Poss KD. 2012. Clonally dominant cardiomyocytes direct heart morphogenesis. Nature 484, 479–484. (doi:10.1038/nature11045) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Song WC. 2012. Crosstalk between complement and toll-like receptors. Toxicol. Pathol. 40, 174–182. (doi:10.1177/0192623311428478) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.D'Annunzio V, Perez V, Boveris A, Gelpi RJ, Poderoso JJ. 2016. Role of thioredoxin-1 in ischemic preconditioning, postconditioning and aged ischemic hearts. Pharmacol. Res. 109, 24–31. (doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2016.03.009) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hu X, Dai S, Wu WJ, Tan W, Zhu X, Mu J, Guo Y, Bolli R, Rokosh G. 2007. Stromal cell derived factor-1 alpha confers protection against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury: role of the cardiac stromal cell derived factor-1 alpha CXCR4 axis. Circulation 116, 654–663. (doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.672451) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhou C, Li L, Li H, Gong J, Fang N. 2014. Delayed remote preconditioning induces cardioprotection: role of heme oxygenase-1. J. Surg. Res. 191, 51–57. (doi:10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.054) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shintani-Ishida K, Nakajima M, Uemura K, Yoshida K. 2006. Ischemic preconditioning protects cardiomyocytes against ischemic injury by inducing GRP78. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 345, 1600–1605. (doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.05.077) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Uygur A, Lee RT. 2016. Mechanisms of cardiac regeneration. Dev. Cell 36, 362–374. (doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2016.01.018) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jazwinska A, Sallin P. 2016. Regeneration versus scarring in vertebrate appendages and heart. J. Pathol. 238, 233–246. (doi:10.1002/path.4644) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Canatan H. 2008. The effect of cardiac ischemic preconditioning on rat left ventricular gene expression profile. Cell Biochem. Funct. 26, 179–184. (doi:10.1002/cbf.1425) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kikuchi K, et al. 2010. Primary contribution to zebrafish heart regeneration by gata4+ cardiomyocytes. Nature 464, 601–605. (doi:10.1038/nature08804) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gupta V, Gemberling M, Karra R, Rosenfeld GE, Evans T, Poss KD. 2013. An injury-responsive gata4 program shapes the zebrafish cardiac ventricle. Curr. Biol. 23, 1221–1227. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.028) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gross GJ, Baker JE, Moore J, Falck JR, Nithipatikom K. 2011. Abdominal surgical incision induces remote preconditioning of trauma (RPCT) via activation of bradykinin receptors (BK2R) and the cytochrome P450 epoxygenase pathway in canine hearts. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 25, 517–522. (doi:10.1007/s10557-011-6321-9) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Jones WK, et al. 2009. Peripheral nociception associated with surgical incision elicits remote nonischemic cardioprotection via neurogenic activation of protein kinase C signaling. Circulation 120(Suppl 11), S1–S9. (doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.843938) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chen WJ, et al. 2005. Gene expression profiles in hypoxic preconditioning using cDNA microarray analysis: altered expression of an angiogenic factor, carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 1. Shock 24, 124–131. (doi:10.1097/01.shk.0000170352.72694.36) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cai FG, Xiao JS, Ye QF. 2006. Effects of ischemic preconditioning on cyclinD1 expression during early ischemic reperfusion in rats. World J. Gastroenterol. 12, 2936–2940. (doi:10.3748/wjg.v12.i18.2936) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wang M, Shen J, Feng B, Gui L, Chen Q, Zhang B, Tang J, Li X. 2013. Remote ischemic preconditioning promotes early liver cell proliferation in a rat model of small-for-size liver transplantation. J. Surg. Res. 179, e245–e253. (doi:10.1016/j.jss.2012.02.007) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chen HH, Lu PJ, Chen BR, Hsiao M, Ho WY, Tseng CJ. 2015. Heme oxygenase-1 ameliorates kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice through extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2-enhanced tubular epithelium proliferation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1852, 2195–2201. (doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.07.018) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Humphreys BD, Valerius MT, Kobayashi A, Mugford JW, Soeung S, Duffield JS, McMahon AP, Bonventre JV. 2008. Intrinsic epithelial cells repair the kidney after injury. Cell Stem Cell 2, 284–291. (doi:10.1016/j.stem.2008.01.014) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Michalopoulos GK. 1990. Liver regeneration: molecular mechanisms of growth control. FASEB J. 4, 176–187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wills AA, Kidd AR III, Lepilina A, Poss KD. 2008. Fgfs control homeostatic regeneration in adult zebrafish fins. Development 135, 3063–3070. (doi:10.1242/dev.024588) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lepilina A, Coon AN, Kikuchi K, Holdway JE, Roberts RW, Burns CG, Poss KD. 2006. A dynamic epicardial injury response supports progenitor cell activity during zebrafish heart regeneration. Cell 127, 607–619. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.052) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kikuchi K, Holdway JE, Major RJ, Blum N, Dahn RD, Begemann G, Poss KD. 2011. Retinoic acid production by endocardium and epicardium is an injury response essential for zebrafish heart regeneration. Dev. Cell 20, 397–404. (doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2011.01.010) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kim J, et al. 2010. PDGF signaling is required for epicardial function and blood vessel formation in regenerating zebrafish hearts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 17 206–17 210. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0915016107) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Chablais F, Jazwinska A. 2012. The regenerative capacity of the zebrafish heart is dependent on TGFbeta signaling. Development 139, 1921–1930. (doi:10.1242/dev.078543) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sallin P, Jaźwińska A. 2016. Acute stress is detrimental to heart regeneration in zebrafish. Open Biol. 6, 160012 (doi:10.1098/rsob.160012) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.