Abstract
Background:
Frozen shoulder is resulting in limb disability and reduction of quality of life but the factors associated with patients’ disability and quality of life is not clear. To assess pain, disability, the quality of life and factors associated with them in patients suffering from frozen shoulder.
Methods:
We enrolled 120 patients (37 men and 83 women) with phase-II idiopathic frozen shoulder in our cross-sectional study. Demographic data were collected and shoulder range of motion was measured in four different directions (elevation, abduction, external and internal rotation) in both upper limbs. Patients were asked to fill out Visual Analog Scale for pain (VAS) and, Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) as well as Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaires. We asked the patients to fill out the Hamilton anxiety and depression questionnaires.
Results:
The mean of VAS pain, DASH, PCS, and MCS scores were 69(18), 53(17), 35(8.0), and 42(10) respectively. All the domains of SF36 questionnaires where below the normal population except physical function. VAS pain score was correlated to Hamilton depression scores in both bivariate and mulivarilable analysis. DASH score were correlated to sex, age, ROM, and both Hamilton anxiety and depression scores; However, DASH score only impact with Hamilton anxiety and ROM independently. PCS is correlated to age and MCS to Hamilton depression.
Conclusion:
Patient with frozen shoulder are more suffering from pain and disability secondary to psychiatric parameters such as depression and anxiety than demographic features or even restriction of range of motion.
Keywords: Adhesive capsulaitis, Disability, Frozen shoulder, Pain, Quality of life, Shoulder
Introduction
Frozen shoulder or adhesive capsulitis is a common disease affecting 2 to 5% of population andpresenting with pain and restriction of shoulder range of motion in all directions (1-3). Although this condition described from long years ago (Duplay in 1879) however it has remained a controversial topic (4-6). It was previously believed that this disease has a self-limiting nature. However recent studies revealed that the disease course might last as long as 10 years and up to 40% of the patients continue to suffer from it throughout their lives (5-8).
Frozen shoulder is significantly resulting in limb disability and reduction of quality of life (9,10). It is not clear what factors predict the severity of pain and disability as well as quality of life in patients suffering from frozen shoulder. Comorbidities are associated with more disability and less quality of life in these patients but not the severely of pain (5). Psychiatric disorders can be affect pain, disability and quality of life as well as patients characteristic and objective symptoms(11-17), but the effect of these parameters on frozen shoulder were not discussed so much.
In current study we were curious about the severity of pain, disability and the quality of life in patients suffering from frozen shoulder. Moreover, we tried to find which factors contribute with pain, disability and quality of life of those patients.
Materials and Methods
After approval of the study by the Research Ethical Board of our institute, we enrolled 120 patients with idiopathic frozen shoulder in our cross-sectional study. Adult patients with phase-II frozen shoulder, diagnosed upon their prior medical history, physical examination, and imaging (MRI and radiographs), were enrolled in our referral hospital. The minimum duration of shoulder pain was 3 months for all included individuals. Our exclusion criteria were: history of rotator cuff tear, previous shoulder surgery or fracture and, psychosis. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Demographic data were collected and shoulder range of motion was measured in four different directions (elevation, abduction, external and internal rotation) in both upper limbs. Patients were asked to fill out Visual Analog Scale for pain (VAS) and, Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) as well as Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaires (18). We asked the patients to fill out the Hamilton anxiety and depression questionnaires (19).
There were 37 men and 83 women, their ages ranging from 23to 88 years (mean 52 years).12 patients (10%) suffered from bilateral involvement [Table 1]. 24% of patients had the history of diabetes followed by hypothyroidism (7.5%). According to Hamilton anxiety and depression questionnaires, the patients had normal anxiety and mild depression. Our demographic features were similar to previous studies (7, 8).
Table 1.
Sex, n (%) | |
---|---|
Men | 37 (31) |
Women | 83 (69) |
Age, mean (SD) (year) | 52(17) |
Dominante hand, n (%) | |
Right | |
Left | |
Affected limb, n (%) | |
Right | 65 (54) |
left | 43 (36) |
bilateral | 12 (10) |
Education, n (%) | |
No education | 17 (14) |
High school | 63 (52) |
Bachelor | 29 (24) |
Master and more | 11 (9.2) |
Disease history, n (%) | |
Diabetes | 29 (24) |
Hypothyrioidism | 9 (7.5) |
Cervical disk herniation | 8 (6.8) |
Heart disease | 6 (5.0) |
Breast surgery | 4 (3.3) |
Seizure | 3 (2.5) |
Hyperthyroidism | 2 (1.7) |
Range of motion, mean (SD) (degree) | |
Elevation | 121(42) |
Abduction | 122(41) |
External rotation | 45(20) |
Internal rotation* | 3.2(1.2) |
Total ROM | |
DASH Score, mean (SD) | 53(17) |
VAS Score, mean (SD) | 69(18) |
SF-36, mean (SD) | |
physical function | 61(20) |
Role physical | 26(23) |
Body pain | 35(20) |
General health | 51(16) |
Vitality | 49(13) |
Social function | 60(23) |
Role emotion | 48(37) |
Mental health | 55(18) |
Physical component summary | 35(8) |
Mental component summary | 42(10) |
Anxiety, mean (SD) | 11(5.5) |
Depression, mean (SD) | 13(6.3) |
Internal rotation was defined with a six score scale as the back of hand reached to inter scapular, thoracolumbar junction, mid lumbar, lumbosacral junction, buttock and lateral of thigh respectively.
(DASH=Disadility of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, VAS=Visual Analoge Scale, ROM=Range of Motion, SF-36= Short Form 36 Questionnaire)
We used the Farsi validated version of SF-36. Internal rotation was specified by a six score scale [1 to 6] as the back of hand reached to inter scapular, thoracolumbar junction, mid lumbar, lumbosacral junction, buttock and lateral thigh respectively. Hamilton depression questionnaire scores interpreted as normal [0-7], mild [8-16], moderate [17-23], and severe [>24]. Severity of symptoms of anxiety, base on Hamilton anxiety questionnaire, was classified as normal [0-13], mild [14-17], moderate [18-24], and severe [>24] following the Hamilton anxiety questionnaire.
We used independent t-test and ANOVA test to compare two independent means of variables between different subgroups. String variable were assessed with Fisher’s exact test and Chi-square test. We used multivariable linear analysis to find independent predictors explaining DASH and SF-36 variation. All the statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS version 16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL). A p-value of less than 0.05 was deemed to be significant. For interpretation of correlation we assumed coefficient as weak (<0.4), moderate (0.4 to 0.7), and strong (>0.7). Predictors with p-value of less than 0.1 were entered to multivariable linear analysis.
Results
The mean of VAS pain, DASH, PCS, and MCS scores were 69(18), 53(17), 35(8.0), and 42(10) respectively (Tale-1). All the domains of SF36 questionnaires where below the normal population except physical function [Table 2] VAS pain score was correlated to Hamilton depression scores in both bivariate and multivariate analysis. DASH score were correlated to sex, age, ROM, and both Hamilton anxiety and depression scores; However, DASH score only impact with Hamilton anxiety and ROM independently. PCS is correlated to age and MCS to Hamilton depression [Table 3; 4].
Table 2.
DASH score | VAS score | SF-36 (PCS component) | SF-36 (MCS component) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Correlation | P value | Correlation | P value | Correlation | P value | Correlation | P value | ||
Age | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.039 | 0.68 | -0.24 | 0.008 | 0.13 | 0.15 | |
Education | -0.77 | 0.41 | 0.024 | 0.79 | 0.18 | 0.051 | 0.13 | 0.17 | |
Range of motion | |||||||||
Elevation | -0.34 | <0.001 | -0.15 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.25 | 0.16 | 0.11 | |
Abduction | -0.33 | 0.001 | -0.16 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.29 | 0.14 | 0.16 | |
External rotation | -0.26 | 0.008 | -0.13 | 0.18 | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.55 | 0.57 | |
Internal rotation* | -0.37 | <0.001 | -0.15 | 0.13 | -0.02 | 0.83 | 0.24 | 0.012 | |
Total ROM | 0.38 | <0.001 | 0.18 | 0.073 | -0.093 | 0.34 | -0.18 | 0.067 | |
Anxiety | 0.32 | <0.001 | 0.11 | 0.24 | -0.12 | 0.19 | -0.51 | <0.001 | |
Depression | 0.38 | <0.001 | 0.21 | 0.024 | -0.14 | 0.12 | -0.601 | 0.021 | |
Mean (SD) | P Value | Mean (SD) | P Value | Mean (SD) | P Value | Mean (SD) | P Value | ||
Sex | |||||||||
Man | 48 (19) | 0.044 | 6.7 (1.7) | 0.65 | 36 (7.6) | 0.21 | 45 (12) | 0.081 | |
Woman | 55 (15) | 6.9 (1.8) | 34 (7.8) | 41 (9.2) | |||||
Dominate hand | |||||||||
Right | 53 (16) | 0.79 | 6.8 (1.8) | 0.99 | 35 (7.4) | 0.61 | 42 (10) | 0.29 | |
Left | 54 (19) | 6.8 (1.7) | 34 (11) | 45 (8.9) | |||||
Affected limb | |||||||||
Right | 53 (17) | 0.78 | 6.8 (1.7) | 0.50 | 35 (6.5) | 0.058 | 43 (11) | 0.82 | |
Left | 52 (17) | 6.8 (1.9) | 36 (8.8) | 41 (10) |
Internal rotation was defined with a six score scale as the back of hand reached to inter scapular, thoracolumbar junction, mid lumbar, lumbosacral junction, buttock and lateral of thigh respectively.
(DASH=Disadility of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, VAS=Visual Analoge Scale, ROM=Range of Motion, PCS=Physical Component Summery, MCS=Mental Component Summery, SF-36= Short Form 36 Questionnaire)
Table 3.
SF-36 domains | Mean | SD | Normal population mean | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
physical function | 60.6 | 20.3 | 55 | 0.003 |
Role physical | 26.3 | 22.8 | 50 | <0.001 |
Body pain | 34.5 | 19.7 | 48 | <0.001 |
General health | 51.3 | 16.3 | 55 | 0.015 |
Vitality | 48.9 | 12.7 | 63 | <0.001 |
Social function | 60.3 | 23.3 | 66 | 0.008 |
Role emotion | 47.5 | 36.8 | 63 | <0.001 |
Mental health | 54.9 | 17.5 | 63 | <0.001 |
Physical component summary | 34.7 | 7.8 | 52 | <0.001 |
Mental component summary | 42.4 | 10.2 | 64 | <0.001 |
Table 4.
Model | R2 | Beta | Standard Error | P value | Partial R2 | 95% CI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DASH score* | 0.24 | ||||||
Anxiety | 0.98 | 0.28 | 0.001 | 0.11 | 0.43 | 1.5 | |
Total ROM | 0.29 | 0.085 | 0.001 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.47 | |
VAS score | 0.039 | ||||||
Depression | 0.055 | 0.027 | 0.044 | 0.039 | 0.002 | 0.109 | |
SF-36 (PCS component) | 0.056 | ||||||
Age | -0.147 | 0.056 | 0.011 | 0.056 | -0.259 | -0.036 | |
SF-36 (MCS component)* | 0.36 | ||||||
Depression | -0.98 | 0.13 | <0.001 | 0.36 | -1.2 | -0.72 |
Sex, total ROM, Anxiety, and Depression met the criterion for entry and were inserted in the model
Total ROM, and Depression met the criterion for entry and were inserted in the model.
Age, Affected Hand, Education met the criterion for entry and were inserted in the model.
(DASH=Disadility of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, VAS=Visual Analoge Scale, ROM=Range of Motion, PCS=Physical Component Summery, MCS=Mental Component Summery, SF-36= Short Form 36 Questionnaire)
Discussion
In this study, patients suffering from frozen shoulder demonstrated high rate of pain and disability as well as low quality of life compare to normal population. Pain, disability and mental component of quality of life in these patients are more correlated to psychological factors (anxiety and depression) than physical or personal parameter (age, sex, education, or ROM). Pain and mental component of quality of life were more affected with depression, but disability of upper extremity more impact with anxiety. Physical component of quality of life was only affected with age.
There are some limitations to our study. The patients restricted to a certain referral hospital and may not reflect the whole population. Moreover, the nature of study cross sectional, which does not allowus to establish a causative relationship between pain, disability, and quality of life with our explanatory variables.
In a relevant phase-II frozen shoulder on one hundred patients with comparable age and sex, the mean of VAS, DASH, PCS. And MCS scores were 5.9, 76, 55, and 63 respectively which are highly compatible with our results (5). Other studies report high rate of pain, disability and lower quality of life compare to general public (10, 13, 20, 21).
We found only depression as the factor contributing with severity of pain in patients suffering from frozen shoulder. In another study on rotator cuff repair, similar to ours, only depression, but not anxiety, was associated with increased VAS score (12). However, Ding et al. reported higher VAS scores correlation with both depression and anxiety (13). Bair et al. evaluated the relationship of pain experience with depression and anxiety in patients with musculoskeletal pain and reported that both depression and anxiety were associated with increased pain (16).
Ding et el.demonstrated that Psychological disorders more affect on the disabilities than ROM in patients suffering from frozen shoulder (13). They found a significant correlation between both depression and anxiety with upper extremity disability but not ROM. Griggs et al. found no correlation between ROM and DASH score (20). However, in our study both anxiety and ROM impact the affected limb function.
Only mental component of the quality of life affected with psychiatric factor (depression) rather than the physical one. This is in agreement with the findings of Ding et al (13), and is further supported by our previous results, which indicated that subjective symptoms (pain and limb disability) were affected more than objective signs (range of motion) by depression and anxiety. The only domain in SF-36 questionnaire that was above the normal average was physical function. Wolf and Green studied the influence of comorbidities on quality of life in patients with frozen shoulder and found that physical function was inappropriately higher among PCS domains (8). They reported that except physical function, emotional role and mental health, other domains were lower than normal population range. Similarly, Hodkinson et al. have shown that depression and anxiety could decrease the quality of life of patients suffering from arthritic hand (14).
In conclusion, patient with frozen shoulder are more suffering from pain and disability secondary to psychiatric parameters such as depression and anxiety than demographic features or even restriction of range of motion. The physician should always consider those disorders to promote patient condition.
References
- 1.Carette S. Adhesive capsulitis--research advances frozen in time? J Rheumatol. 2000;27(6):1329–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Resh. 1987;214:160–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bunker TD. Frozen shoulder: unravelling the enigma. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997;79(3):210–3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Goldberg BA, Scarlat MM, Harryman Li DT. Management of the stiff shoulder. J orthop sci. 1999;4(6):462–71. doi: 10.1007/s007760050131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vastamäki H, Kettunen J, Vastamäki M. The natural history of idiopathic frozen shoulder: a 2-to 27-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(4):1133–43. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2176-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ebrahimzadeh MH, Moradi A, Pour MK, Moghadam MH, Kachooei AR. Clinical outcomes after arthroscopic release for recalcitrant frozen shoulder. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2014;2(3):220–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lundberg BJ. The frozen shoulder. Clinical and radiographical observations. The effect of manipulation under general anesthesia. Structure and glycosaminoglycan content of the joint capsule. Local bone metabolism. Acta orthop Scand Suppl. 1969;119:1–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wolf JM, Green A. Influence of comorbidity on self-assessment instrument scores of patients with idiopathic adhesive capsulitis. J Bone Joint Surg Ame. 2002;84-A(7):1167–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hazleman BL. The painful stiff shoulder. Rheumatol Phys Med. 1972;11(8):413–21. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/11.8.413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Harris AH, Youd J, Buchbinder R. A comparison of directly elicited and pre-scored preference-based measures of quality of life: the case of adhesive capsulitis. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(10):2963–71. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0415-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Alizadehkhaiyat O, Fisher AC, Kemp GJ, Frostick SP. Pain, functional disability, and psychologic status in tennis elbow. Clin J Pain. 2007;23(6):482–9. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31805f70fa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cho CH, Seo HJ, Bae KC, Lee KJ, Hwang I, Warner JJ. The impact of depression and anxiety on self-assessed pain, disability, and quality of life in patients scheduled for rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22(9):1160–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ding H, Tang Y, Xue Y, Yang Z, Li Z, He D, et al. A report on the prevalence of depression and anxiety in patients with frozen shoulder and their relations to disease status. Psychol Health Med. 2014;19(6):730–7. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2013.873814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hodkinson B, Maheu E, Michon M, Carrat F, Berenbaum F. Assessment and determinants of aesthetic discomfort in hand osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Diss. 2012;71(1):45–9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2011.153965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ring D, Kadzielski J, Fabian L, Zurakowski D, Malhotra LR, Jupiter JB. Self-reported upper extremity health status correlates with depression. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(9):1983–8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bair MJ, Wu J, Damush TM, Sutherland JM, Kroenke K. Association of depression and anxiety alone and in combination with chronic musculoskeletal pain in primary care patients. Psychosom Med. 2008;70(8):890–7. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e318185c510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wolkind SN. Psychiatric aspects of low back pain. Physiotherapy. 1974;60(3):75–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ebrahimzadeh MH, Moradi A, Vahedi E, Kachooei AR, Birjandinejad A. Validity and reliability of the Persian version of shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (quick-DASH) Int J Prev Med. 2015;6:59. doi: 10.4103/2008-7802.160336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Montazeri A, Vahdaninia M, Ebrahimi M, Jarvandi S. The hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1(1):14. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Griggs SM, Ahn A, Green A. Idiopathic adhesive capsulitis. A prospective functional outcome study of nonoperative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82-A(10):1398–407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Buchbinder R, Hoving JL, Green S, Hall S, Forbes A, Nash P. Short course prednisolone for adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder or stiff painful shoulder): a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63(11):1460–9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.018218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]