Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 1991 Feb;44(2):147–151. doi: 10.1136/jcp.44.2.147

Comparison of image analysis and flow cytometric determination of cellular DNA content.

C Cope 1, D Rowe 1, L Delbridge 1, J Philips 1, M Friedlander 1
PMCID: PMC496978  PMID: 1864987

Abstract

A good correlation (r = 0.94) was obtained between the DNA indices (DI) using flow cytometry and image analysis of nuclei cytospins extracted from paraffin wax embedded tumour sections. Some of the limitations and problems associated with image analysis which came to light included an unacceptably high coefficient of variation (CV) and a "left-shift" in the DI in most DNA histograms obtained when using image analysis of 5 microns sections. In contrast, the DNA histograms generated using image analysis of cytospun nuclei from paraffin wax blocks were of good quality and similar to those obtained using flow cytometry. Variability in Feulgen staining was common and an important source of error despite rigorous control of the staining technique. This could be overcome by using internal controls such as fibroblasts rather than external controls (rat hepatocytes) to determine the diploid DI with image analysis. A thorough understanding and appreciation of the methodological problems associated with image analysis and flow cytometric determination of DNA content is required before these methods find widespread clinical application.

Full text

PDF
147

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berryman I., Sterrett G. F., Papadimitriou J. M. Feulgen DNA cytophotometry in histologic sections of mammary neoplasms. Anal Quant Cytol. 1984 Mar;6(1):19–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cornelisse C. J., de Koning H. R., Moolenaar A. J., van de Velde C. J., Ploem J. S. Image and flow cytometric analysis of DNA content in breast cancer. Relation to estrogen receptor content and lymph node involvement. Anal Quant Cytol. 1984 Mar;6(1):9–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dressler L. G., Seamer L. C., Owens M. A., Clark G. M., McGuire W. L. DNA flow cytometry and prognostic factors in 1331 frozen breast cancer specimens. Cancer. 1988 Feb 1;61(3):420–427. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19880201)61:3<420::aid-cncr2820610303>3.0.co;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Friedlander M. L., Hedley D. W., Swanson C., Russell P. Prediction of long-term survival by flow cytometric analysis of cellular DNA content in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1988 Feb;6(2):282–290. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1988.6.2.282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Friedlander M. L., Hedley D. W., Taylor I. W., Russell P., Coates A. S., Tattersall M. H. Influence of cellular DNA content on survival in advanced ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 1984 Jan;44(1):397–400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fu Y. S., Hall T. L. DNA ploidy measurements in tissue sections. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 1985 Jun;7(2):90–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hedley D. W., Friedlander M. L., Taylor I. W., Rugg C. A., Musgrove E. A. Method for analysis of cellular DNA content of paraffin-embedded pathological material using flow cytometry. J Histochem Cytochem. 1983 Nov;31(11):1333–1335. doi: 10.1177/31.11.6619538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hosaka Y., Rainwater L. M., Grant C. S., Farrow G. M., van Heerden J. A., Lieber M. M. Pheochromocytoma: nuclear deoxyribonucleic acid patterns studied by flow cytometry. Surgery. 1986 Dec;100(6):1003–1010. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hrafnkelsson J., Stål O., Eneström S., Jonasson J. G., Björnsson J., Olafsdottir K., Nordenskjöld B. Cellular DNA pattern, S-phase frequency and survival in papillary thyroid cancer. Acta Oncol. 1988;27(4):329–333. doi: 10.3109/02841868809093550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kheir S. M., Bines S. D., Vonroenn J. H., Soong S. J., Urist M. M., Coon J. S. Prognostic significance of DNA aneuploidy in stage I cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg. 1988 Apr;207(4):455–461. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198804000-00014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kokal W., Sheibani K., Terz J., Harada J. R. Tumor DNA content in the prognosis of colorectal carcinoma. JAMA. 1986 Jun 13;255(22):3123–3127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kute T. E., Muss H. B., Hopkins M., Marshall R., Case D., Kammire L. Relationship of flow cytometry results to clinical and steroid receptor status in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1985;6(2):113–121. doi: 10.1007/BF02235742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lindahl B., Alm P., Fernö M., Killander D., Långström E., Norgren A., Trope C. Prognostic value of flow cytometrical DNA measurements in stage I-II endometrial carcinoma: correlations with steroid receptor concentration, tumor myometrial invasion, and degree of differentiation. Anticancer Res. 1987 Jul-Aug;7(4B):791–797. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McCready R. W., Papadimitriou J. M. An analysis of DNA cytophotometry on tissue sections in a rat liver model. Anal Quant Cytol. 1983 Jun;5(2):117–123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mikel U. V., Fishbein W. N., Bahr G. F. Some practical considerations in quantitative absorbance microspectrophotometry. Preparation techniques in DNA cytophotometry. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 1985 Jun;7(2):107–118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mikuz G., Hofstaedter F., Delgado R. Extraction of cells from paraffin-embedded tissue sections for single-cell DNA cytophotometry. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 1985 Dec;7(4):343–346. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rodenburg C. J., Ploem-Zaaijer J. J., Cornelisse C. J., Mesker W. E., Hermans J., Heintz P. A., Ploem J. S., Fleuren G. J. Use of DNA image cytometry in addition to flow cytometry for the study of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 1987 Aug 1;47(15):3938–3941. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Vindeløv L. L., Christensen I. J., Jensen G., Nissen N. I. Limits of detection of nuclear DNA abnormalities by flow cytometric DNA analysis. Results obtained by a set of methods for sample-storage, staining and internal standardization. Cytometry. 1983 Mar;3(5):332–339. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990030505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Volm M., Mattern J., Sonka J., Vogt-Schaden M., Wayss K. DNA distribution in non-small-cell lung carcinomas and its relationship to clinical behavior. Cytometry. 1985 Jul;6(4):348–356. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990060412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. van Driel-Kulker A. M., Mesker W. E., van der Burg M. J., Ploem J. S. Preparation of cells from paraffin-embedded tissue for cytometry and cytomorphologic evaluation. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 1987 Jun;9(3):225–231. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES