Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2010 Jan 1;96:69–70. doi: 10.1007/s11060-009-0099-7

Erratum to: The role of stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline

Mark E Linskey 1, David W Andrews 2, Anthony L Asher 3, Stuart H Burri 4, Douglas Kondziolka 5, Paula D Robinson 6, Mario Ammirati 7, Charles S Cobbs 8, Laurie E Gaspar 9, Jay S Loeffler 10, Michael McDermott 11, Minesh P Mehta 12, Tom Mikkelsen 13, Jeffrey J Olson 14, Nina A Paleologos 15, Roy A Patchell 16, Timothy C Ryken 17, Steven N Kalkanis 13,
PMCID: PMC4969816

Erratum to: J Neurooncol DOI 10.1007/s11060-009-0073-4

In the Absract of the original publication, the level numbers indicated for the Recommendations regarding SRS plus WBRT vs. WBRT alone were incorrect. The correct level numbers are shown below.

Recommendations

SRS plus WBRT vs. WBRT alone

Level 1 Single-dose SRS along with WBRT leads to significantly longer patient survival compared with WBRT alone for patients with single metastatic brain tumors who have a KPS ≥ 70.

Level 1 Single-dose SRS along with WBRT is superior in terms of local tumor control and maintaining functional status when compared to WBRT alone for patients with 1–4 metastatic brain tumors who have a KPS ≥ 70.

Level 2 Single-dose SRS along with WBRT may lead to significantly longer patient survival than WBRT alone for patients with 2–3 metastatic brain tumors.

Level 3 There is class III evidence demonstrating that single-dose SRS along with WBRT is superior to WBRT alone for improving patient survival for patients with single or multiple brain metastases and a KPS < 70.

Footnotes

The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s11060-009-0073-4.


Articles from Journal of Neuro-Oncology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES