Erratum to: Osteoporos Int
DOI 10.1007/s00198-009-0911-4
In Table 1, the data on “Location of compression fracture” should read: 1 (T8); 1(T11); 2(T12); 4 (L1); 4 (L2); 1 (L4); 1 (L5)
Table 1.
Characteristics | Value |
---|---|
Age (year) | 69.42 ± 10.26 |
Sex (M/F) | 4/10 |
Bone mineral density (T score) | −3.19 ± 0.66. |
Filler material volume (mL) | 3.98 ± 0.88 |
Mean follow-up period (month) | 25.43 ± 1.91 (24–30 months) |
Location of compression fracture | 1 (T8); 1 (T11); 2 (T12); 4 (L1); 4 (L2); 1 (L4); 1 (L5) |
Morphological changes of injected CaP (number of patients) | Seven of 14 patients (50%) Reabsorption (6) Osteogenesis (2) Condensation (2) Bone cement fracture (1) Heterotopic ossification (3) |
Progression of compression of treated vertebrae | 11 of 14 patients (78.6%) |
In the subsection “Clinical and radiological analysis”, the first sentence of the second paragraph should read: “In addition, we also reviewed many radiological parameters such as the compression ratio, morphological changes of the injected CaP cement in the vertebral bodies, and the incidence of any subsequent adjacent or remote vertebral compression fractures.”
Footnotes
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1007/s00198-009-0911-4.