Abstract
Five hundred and twenty two clinical urine specimens submitted for routine microbiological examination were tested in parallel by conventional microscopy and culture and for lipopolysaccharide antibodies by an enzyme linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA) to assess the ELISA as a screen for urinary tract infection. When the ELISA alone was compared with routine methods the specificity sensitivity, and predictive value of positive and negative tests was 73.2%, 75.7%, 51.1% and 38.5%. For ELISA with microscopy the same variables were 71.1%, 82.2%, and 92.4% and 94.7%, respectively. The ELISA absorbency increased with increasing bacterial numbers, but results varied widely. Only 65.4% of urines which contained greater than or equal to 10(5) bacteria/ml were positive by ELISA; 36.8% of urines with less than 10(3) bacteria/ml were positive by ELISA; 100% of greater than or equal to 10(5) bacteria/ml cultures of Pseudomonas sp (n = 4), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 3), and Streptococcus faecalis (n = 2) were positive by ELISA but only 71.4% of Proteus sp (n = 7), 61.4% coliforms (n = 70), and 25% of coagulase negative staphylococci (n = 4). It is concluded that further development is required before the ELISA can be used for routine screening for urinary tract infection.
Full text
PDF


Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Akerlund A. S., Ahlstedt S., Hanson L. A., Jodal U. Antibody responses in urine and serum against Escherichia coli O antigen in childhood urinary tract infection. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand C. 1979 Feb;87C(1):29–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barker B. A., Ratcliffe J. G., Turner G. C. Urine screening for leucocytes and bacteria by dipstick and reflectance spectrophotometry. Med Lab Sci. 1989 Apr;46(2):97–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boreland P. C., Stoker M. Dipstick analysis for screening of paediatric urine. J Clin Pathol. 1986 Dec;39(12):1360–1362. doi: 10.1136/jcp.39.12.1360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jodal U., Ahlstedt S., Carlsson B., Hanson L. A., Lindberg U., Sohl A. Local antibodies in childhood urinary tract infection: a preliminary study. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1974;47(4):537–546. doi: 10.1159/000231248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MacGowan A. P., Cowling P., Marshall R. J., Reeves D. S. Screening of urines with dipstrips: does it reduce workload and consumable costs? J Clin Pathol. 1990 Oct;43(10):875–875. doi: 10.1136/jcp.43.10.875-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McKenzie H., Young D. N. Antibody to coliform antigens in urine samples from patients with symptoms of urinary tract infection. J Clin Pathol. 1987 Jul;40(7):787–792. doi: 10.1136/jcp.40.7.787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ratner J. J., Thomas V. L., Sanford B. A., Forland M. Bacteria-specific antibody in the urine of patients with acute pyelonephritis and cystitis. J Infect Dis. 1981 Mar;143(3):404–412. doi: 10.1093/infdis/143.3.404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
