Skip to main content
Molecular Cytogenetics logoLink to Molecular Cytogenetics
. 2016 Aug 2;9:55. doi: 10.1186/s13039-016-0269-1

Partial monosomy14q involving FOXG1 and NOVA1 in an infant with microcephaly, seizures and severe developmental delay

H Fryssira 1, E Tsoutsou 1, S Psoni 1, S Amenta 2, T Liehr 6, E Anastasakis 7, Ch Skentou 5, A Ntouflia 3, I Papoulidis 3, E Manolakos 3,8,, N Chaliasos 4
PMCID: PMC4970234  PMID: 27486480

Abstract

Background

FOXG1 gene mutations have been associated with the congenital variant of Rett syndrome (RTT) since the initial description of two patients in 2008. The on-going accumulation of clinical data suggests that the FOXG1-variant of RTT forms a distinguishable phenotype, consisting mainly of postnatal microcephaly, seizures, hypotonia, developmental delay and corpus callosum agenesis.

Case presentation

We report a 6-month-old female infant, born at 38 weeks of gestation after in vitro fertilization, who presented with feeding difficulties, irritability and developmental delay from the first months of life. Microcephaly with bitemporal narrowing, dyspraxia, poor eye contact and strabismus were also noted. At 10 months, the proband exhibited focal seizures and required valproic acid treatment. Array-Comparative Genomic Hybridization revealed a 4.09 Mb deletion in 14q12 region, encompassing the FOXG1 and NOVA1 genes. The proband presented similar feature with patients with 14q12 deletions except for dysgenesis of corpus callosum. Disruption of the NOVA1 gene which promotes the motor neurons apoptosis has not yet been linked to any human phenotypes and it is uncertain if it affects our patient’s phenotype.

Conclusions

Since our patient is the first reported case with deletion of both genes (FOXG1-NOVA1), thorough clinical follow up would further delineate the Congenital Rett-Variant phenotypes.

Keywords: FOXG1 syndrome, Rett syndrome, NOVA1, Array-CGH, Postnatal microcephaly, Seizures

Background

Since 2008, when mutations in the FOXG1 gene were initially described in two patients with Rett-like symptoms, more than 90 patients have been reported to have mutations involving the FOXG1 gene [16]. Rett syndrome is typically an X-linked neurodegenerative condition [6] that was initially described by Andreas Rett in 1966. Common clinical features of Rett syndrome include postnatal microcephaly, autism, seizures, breathing abnormalities, growth retardation and gait apraxia [7, 8]. The majority of patients with typical Rett syndrome carry mutations in the gene encoding Methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2) located at Xq28. Variant forms of Rett syndrome have been revised in 2010 by Neul et al [7]. He classified them in to three main variant categories: 1. Preserved speech, 2. early seizures and, 3. the congenital variant. Mutations in the cyclin-dependent kinase-like 5 (CDKL5) gene located in Xp22 are found in most cases of early-onset seizure variants, while the congenital variant of the syndrome has recently been found to be associated with heterozygous mutations or deletions in the forkhead box protein G1 (FOXG1) gene, located in the 14q12 chromosomal region [7, 911]. In this study, we report a new case of atypical Rett Syndrome with a 14q12 deletion, 4.09 Mb in size, encompassing only two genes, the FOXG1 and the NOVA1 and we discuss the role of the NOVA1 haploinsufficiency.

Case presentation

Our patient was a 6-month- old female infant and the only child of non-consanguineous parents. She was born by caesarean section at 38 weeks of gestation. Her birth weight was 2.990 gr (25th -50th centile), her length was 49 cm (25th -50th centile) and her head circumference was 33 cm (10–25th centile).

It should be noted that the embryo was the product of in vitro fertilization (IVF) by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) due to the husband’s low sperm count. The mother underwent treatment with Follitropin Beta (Puregon), human Chorionic Gonadotropin, hCG (Pregnyl), and Cetrorelix Acetate (Cetrotide).

The patient as a neonate was hypotonic. She was referred for clinical evaluation at the age of 6 months due to irritability and feeding difficulties. The examinations revealed peripheral hypertonia, psychomotor retardation (limited facial expression—no smile, poor eye contact), borderline microcephaly (head circumference of 39 cm, at 3rd centile) (Fig. 1a), periodical stereotypic movements and minor dysmorphic features such as a small forehead with bitemporal narrowing, strabismus, broad base to nose and long philtrum. Her weight was 6.18 kg (25th centile) and her height was 62 cm (25th centile).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Growth curve ¨Head circumference—for—age GIRLS. First Paediatric department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. Professor G.Chroussos. The standard curves are used by the Greek National Health System

Due to gastroesophageal reflux she was treated with ranitidine.

Haematological, biochemical, metabolic, thyroid, ammonia and blood gasses were all normal. The ultrasounds of the heart and abdomen were also normal.

At 10 months the proband exhibited focal seizures and required valproic acid treatment. Sleep deprived EEG examination revealed slower focal activity for her age and sleep spindles which are indicative signs of focal cerebral dysfunction. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed no serious findings except for a septum pellucidum cyst and brain asymmetry—the left hemisphere was larger than the right one.

At the age of 12 months, the head circumference was 40.7 cm (<< 3rd centile) (Fig. 1a) while the height and weight remained between 10th and 25th centile. Severe neurodevelopmental delay was obvious.

Re-examination at the age of 19- months and 2-years, revealed head circumference of 42 cm (<< 3rd centile) (Fig. 1a), height of 75.5 cm (slightly below the 3rd centile) and weight of 9 Kg (slightly below the 3rd centile). The proband exhibited severe psychomotor retardation as she could neither sit independently nor speak at all.

Chromosome and array-based analysis

Metaphase chromosomes were obtained from phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-stimulated peripheral blood lymphocytes and high resolution (550–650 bands) thymidine treatment G-banding karyotype analysis was performed, using standard procedures. Twenty metaphase spreads were analysed, and the result was a normal female karyotype (46, XX). The molecular analysis of the MECP2 gene was normal also.

Further investigation with array-Comparative Genomic Hybridization was performed by hybridizing the sample against a male human reference commercial DNA sample (Promega biotech) using an array-CGH platform that includes 60,000 oligonucleotides distributed across the entire genome (Agilent Technologies). The statistical test used as parameter to estimate the number of copies was ADAM-2 (provided by the DNA analytics software, Agilent Techn.) with a window of 0.5 Mb, A = 6. Only those copy number changes that affect at least 5 consecutive probes with identically oriented change were considered as Copy Number Variations (CNV). For the majority of the genome, the average genomic power of resolution of this analysis was 200 kilobases. Array-CGH analysis detected a 4.09 Mb loss in the 14q12 region (Fig. 2a). The deleted segment was mapped at chr14:25,843,560-29,938,629 region. The genomic coordinates are listed according to genomic build GRCh37/hg19, and includes FOXG1 and NOVA1 genes (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Array-CGH analysis detected a 4.09 Mb loss of the copy numbers in the spanning region 14q12. b Chromosome 14, region 25,843,560-29,938,629. Represents the 4,095,070 bp deletion described in our case report. The region includes both FOXG1 and NOVA1 genes. Figure adapted from http://genome.ucsc.edu/ Accessed at 18/10/2015

The result of array-CGH was confirmed with FISH. Ten metaphases were analysed from phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-stimulated peripheral blood lymphocytes of the patient with RP11-120I18 in 14q12 and wcp 14 probes. The rearrangement was molecular cytogenetically unbalanced (data not shown), therefore the karyotype is: 46,XX, del[12](q12q12).ish14q12(RP11-120I18-). arr[hg19]14q12(25,843,560-29,938,629)x1. Blood samples from both parents were examined with FISH in order to exclude any chromosome rearrangement like inversion. Ten metaphases were analysed from each subject with RP11-332 N6 in 14q11.2, RP11-120I18 in 14q12 and wcp 14 probes, and no rearrangement was detected (data not shown).

Discussion

Recently, the FOXG1 congenital variant of Rett syndrome has been described as a clinically identifiable phenotype, called the “FOXG1 syndrome” [13]. This is an epileptic-dyskinetic developmental encephalopathy with features of classic Rett syndrome, but earlier onset from the first months of life. The main phenotype comprises postnatal microcephaly, severe developmental delay and lack of speech, hypotonia, dyskinesia and corpus callosum hypoplasia. Other symptoms include strabismus, feeding difficulties, bruxism and seizures [8, 1216].

In the present study, a novel FOXG1 and a NOVA1 deletion is described. According to the diagnostic criteria for typical and atypical Rett syndrome [7], our patient possesses only some of the diagnostic criteria for the atypical Rett syndrome. She has slight facial dysmorphism, feeding difficulties, severe psychomotor retardation, postnatal microcephaly, seizures and focal cerebral dysfunction, strabismus and hypertonia. A deletion of 4.09 Mb on chromosome 14q12 including the FOXG1 and NOVA1 genes was identified by array-CGH technique. The clinical phenotypes vary between the reported cases that have mutations or deletions involving the FOXG1 gene and other genes (Table 1, Fig. 3). Our case differs as only two genes, FOXG1 and NOVA1, are involved. These genes were found to be highly expressed in the human brain throughout ontogeny, and double strand breaks in 14q12 region are implicated in the neurodegenerative disease: ataxia telangiectasia [17].

Table 1.

Clinical presentation of patients with FOXG1 mutations and 14q12 deletions

Kumakura et al. 2014 Byun et al. 2015 Patients (n = 8) Cellini et al. 2015 Patients (n = 7) Allou et al. 2012 Patients (n = 2) Philippe et al. 2011 Jacob et al. 2009 Yeung et al. 2009 Patients (n = 2) Ariani et al. 2008 Papa et al. 2008 Present case
1 2 3 4 4 cases with point mutations in FOXG1
Age (Y,M) 8.0 8.0 9.0 3.6 2.0 10.0 2.6–17.0 N/A 22.0 and 10.0 3.0 9.0 22.0 and 7.0 7.0 0.6
Sex M F F M F F 3 F, 1 M 4 F, 3 M F F F F F F
FOXG1 mutation on 14q12 CNV (Mb) 0.54 Mb Del 2.5 Mb Del 2.5 Mb Del 2.8 Mb Del 9.1 Mb Del 7.3 Mb Dup (de novo) p.Gln100Serfs*92, p.Q46X, p.Glu154Glyfs*301, p.Gln86Argfs*106 (de novo) 0.4–4.1 Mb p.Trp308X and p.Tyr400X 2.594 Mb Del 4.45 Mb Dup p.W255X and p.S323fsX325 3 Mb Del 4,09 Del
Genes involved in mutation or point mutations FOXG1, C14orf23 (de novo) FOXG1, C14orf23, PRKD1 (de novo) FOXG1, C14orf23, PRKD1 FOXG1, C14orf23, PRKD1, SCFD1, G2E3, COCH, STRN3 (de novo) STXBP6, NOVA1, FOXG1, C14orf23, PRKD1, SCFD1, G2E3, COCH, STRN3, AP4S1, HECTD1, DTD2, NUBPL, ARHGAP5, AKAP, NPAS3 (de novo) FOXG1 and 50 additional genes (de novo) FOXG1 Deletions in 5 cases, 3 of them distal to FOXG1 and 2 cases of point mutations involving FOXG1 FOXG1 FOXG1, C14orf23 FOXG1, NOVA1, c14orf23, PRKD1, G2E3, SDFD, COCH FOXG1 FOXG1, PRKD1, SCFD1, G2E3, COCH, STRN3 FOXG1, NOVA1
Postnatal microcephaly yes yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes
Psychomotor retardation yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
Hypotonia yes no yes yes yes yes 2/4 cases hypotonic All except 1 case 1/2 cases yes yes yes yes Hypertonia
Diskinesia yes yes yes yes yes yes 3/4 cases diskinetic 3/7 cases yes yes yes yes yes yes
Speech no no no no no no no no no no no no no no
Hand stereotypies no other sterotypies yes no yes yes yes 4/7 cases yes yes hand flapping only yes yes yes
Corpus callosum hypogenesis yes no yes yes yes no 3/4 cases with hypoplasia brain abnormalities in all cases 1/2 cases no, brachycephaly observed no yes no no
Seizures yes yes yes yes yes yes yes 5/7 cases 1/2 cases yes yes yes yes yes
Developmental delay yes yes yes yes yes yes yes 5/7 cases 1/2 cases yes yes yes yes yes

F female, M male, Y years, M months, Del deletion, Dup duplication

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Ideogram of the deletions described in Table 1. The upper thin line indicates the 14q12 region (hg38), and the bold lines indicate the region which is deleted in each case. Cellini et al. 2015 case 3 has a deletion beyond 14q12 and is drawn with a discontinued line

Different clinical features have also been described in patients with FOXG1 point mutations. The severity or lack of the symptoms among cases could depend additionally on genetic and/or environmental factors [13]. Jacob F. et al. in 2009 [9] reported a case of a 2.594 Mb deletion involving the FOXG1 and C23orf14 (Table 1). As in our case, patient had a normal corpus callosum but showed all the typical characteristics found in patients with FOXG1 alterations. Table 1 indicates that almost all cases suffer from microcephaly, dyskinesia, lack of speech, seizures and developmental delay. On the other hand, hypotonia and corpus callosum hypoplasia are not apparent in every case. Progressive hypertonia was obvious in our patient and in at least 10 other reported cases with FOXG1 point mutations [8].

Forkhead BOX G1 (FOXG1) gene (OMIM*164874) encodes a developmental transcription factor with repressor activity, important for the development of the ventral telencephalon in the embryonic forebrain and crucial for the regulation of neurogenesis and neurite outgrowth. It is also expressed in neurogenetic regions of the postnatal brain [15]. Postnatal microcephaly is another common feature of FOXG1 syndrome. In cases with a duplication of the FOXG1 gene, microcephaly is not found (Table 1), indicating that the phenotype is dependent on FOXG1 dosage. Furthermore, other reported cases with deletions close but not disturbing the FOXG1 gene have a similar phenotype as patients with ¨FOXG1 syndrome¨, suggesting that a position effect causing altered expression of FOXG1 gene may be the cause. The protein Kinase D1 (PRKD1) gene (OMIM*605435), located close to FOXG1 gene has been reported to be implicated in transcription and expression of FOXG1 gene [14].

Neuro-Oncological Ventral Antigen 1 (NOVA1) gene (OMIM*602157) encodes a neuron-specific RNA-binding protein that is inhibited by paraneoplastic antibodies [18]. Recently, Storchel H et al., 2015 [19] found that NOVA1 protein converges on Ago proteins and controls miRNA-induced silencing complex (miRISC), possibly resulting on the regulation of neuronal development and synaptic plasticity. Despite the significant role of the NOVA1 gene, it has not been linked to any human phenotype yet. In the case of our patient with FOXG1 syndrome, we are unable to estimate the impact of the NOVA1 haploinsufficiency. NOVA1 haploinsufficiency may act synergistically with the FOXG1 gene or it may cause no difference in the final clinical outcome. Also, we cannot define whether the IVF by ICSI plays a role in the microdeletion of chromosome 14q12 region. Further research should investigate if ICSI could be associated with haploinsufficiency as was the case in our patient.

In conclusion, we present a female patient with clinical features compatible with the congenital variant of Rett syndrome.

Conclusion

Since our patient is the only one with a deletion encompassing only FOXG1 and NOVA1 genes, in the future the thorough clinical follow-up of her neurological status will help for further delineation of the role of these genes.

Abbreviations

CGH, comparative genomic hybridization; EEG, electroencephalogram; ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF, in vitro fertilization; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PHA, phytohemagglutinin; RTT, Rett syndrome

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the members of the family of the patient for their collaboration.

Funding

The whole study was funded by the private company Access to Genome, Clinical Laboratory Genetics, 33A Ethn. Antistaseos str, 55134 Thessaloniki, Greece.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

AN and CS wrote the manuscript; HF, ET, SP and SA coordinated the clinical analysis of the patient; EM performed the cytogenetic analysis; IP signed out the molecular cytogenetic results; EM, IP and NC coordinated the study; All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Contributor Information

H. Fryssira, Email: efrysira@med.uoa.gr

E. Tsoutsou, Email: irenets78@hotmail.com

S. Psoni, Email: psonistavroula@gmail.com

S. Amenta, Email: amenta@hol.gr

T. Liehr, Email: Thomas.Liehr@med.uni-jena.de

E. Anastasakis, Email: loufty28@yahoo.gr

Ch Skentou, Email: haraskent@yahoo.gr.

A. Ntouflia, Email: ntouflia@gmail.com

I. Papoulidis, Email: papoulidis@atg-labs.gr

E. Manolakos, Email: manolakos@atg-labs.gr

N. Chaliasos, Email: nchalias@cc.uoi.gr

References

  • 1.Ariani F, Hayek G, Rondinella D, et al. FOXG1 is responsible for the congenital variant of Rett syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;83:89–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Takagi M, Sasaki G, Mitsui T, Honda M, Tanaka Y, Hasegawa T. A 2.0 Mb microdeletion in proximal chromosome 14q12, involving regulatory elements of FOXG1, with the coding region of FOXG1 being unaffected, results in severe developmental delay, microcephaly, and hypoplasia of the corpus callosum. Eur J Med Genet. 2013;56(9):526–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2013.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Perche O, Haddad G, Menuet A, Callier P, Marcos M, Briault S, Laudier B. Dysregulation of FOXG1 pathway in a 14q12 microdeletion case. Am J Med Genet. 2013;161A(12):3072–7. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ellaway CJ, Ho G, Bettella E, Knapman A, Collins F, Hackett A, McKenzie F, Darmanian A, Peters GB, Fagan K, Christodoulou J. 14q12 microdeletions excluding FOXG1 give rise to a congenital variant Rett syndrome-like phenotype. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21(5):522–7. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stenson PD, Mort M, Ball EV, Shaw K, Phillips A, Cooper DN. The Human Gene Mutation Database: building a comprehensive mutation repository for clinical and molecular genetics, diagnositic testing and personalized genomic medicine. Hum Genet. 2014;133:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s00439-013-1358-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kumakura A, Takahashi S, Okajima K, Hata D. A haploinsufficiency of FOXG1 identified in a boy with congenital variant of Rett syndrome. Brain Dev. 2014;36(8):725–729. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2013.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Neul JL, Kaufmann WE, Glaze DG, et al. Rett Syndrome: revised diagnostic criteria and nomenclature. Ann Neurol. 2010;68:944–50. doi: 10.1002/ana.22124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Byun CK, Lee JS, Lim BC, Kim KJ, Hwang YS and Chae J. FOXG1 Mutation is a Low-Incidence Genetic Cause in Atypical Rett Syndrome. Child Neurology Open. 2015;8:1-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.Jacob F, Ramaswamy V, Andersen J, Bolduc F. Atypical Rett syndrome with selective FOXG1 deletion detected by comparative genomic hybridization: case report and review of literature. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17:1577–1581. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Papa FT, Mencarelli MA, Caselli R, et al. A 3 Mb Deletion in 14q12 Causes Severe Mental Retardation, Mild Facial Dysmorphisms and Rett-like Features. Am J Med Genet. 2008;146:1994–1998. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pantaleón FG, Juvier RT. Molecular basis of Rett syndrome: A current look. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2015;86:142–51. doi: 10.1016/j.rchipe.2015.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Allou L, Lambert L, Amsallem D, Bieth E, Edery P, Destree A, et al. 14q12 and severe Rett-like phenotypes: new clinical insights and physical mapping of FOXG1-regulatory elements. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20:1216–1223. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kortüm F, Das S, Flindt M, Morris-Rosendahl DJ, Stefanova I, Goldstein A, et al. The core FOXG1 syndrome phenotype consists of postnatal microcephaly, severe mental retardation, absent language, dyskinesia, and corpus callosum hypogenesis. J Med Genet. 2011;48:396–406. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2010.087528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pratt DW, Warner JV, Williams MG. Genotyping FOXG1 mutations in patients with clinical evidence of the FOXG1 syndrome. Mol Syndromol. 2013;3(6):284–287. doi: 10.1159/000345845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Florian C, Bahi-Buisson N, Bienvenu T. FOXG1-related disorders: from clinical description to molecular genetics. Mol Syndromol. 2012;2:153–163. doi: 10.1159/000327329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cellini E, Vignoli A, Pisano T, et al. The hyperkinetic movement disorder of FOXG1-related epileptic-dyskinetic encephalopathy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58:93–97. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Iourov IY, Vorsanova SG, Liehr T, Kolotii AD, Yurov YB. Increased chromosome instability dramatically disrupts neural genome integrity and mediates cerebellar degeneration in the ataxia-telangiectasia brain. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:2656–69. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Buckanovich RJ, Yang YY, Darnell RB. The onconeural antigen Nova-1 is a neuron-specific RNA-binding protein, the activity of which is inhibited by paraneoplastic antibodies. J Neurosci. 1996;16:1114–22. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-03-01114.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Störchel PH, Thümmler J, Siegel G, Aksoy-Aksel A, Zampa F, Sumer S, et al. A large-scale functional screen identifies Nova1 and Ncoa3 as regulators of neuronal miRNA function. EMBO J. 2015;34:2237–54. doi: 10.15252/embj.201490643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Molecular Cytogenetics are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES