ABSTRACT
A long-standing problem with analyzing transgene expression in tissue-culture cells is the variation caused by random integration of different copy numbers of transfected transgenes. In mammalian cells, single transgenes can be inserted by homologous recombination but this process is inefficient in Drosophila cells. To tackle this problem, our group, and the Cherbas group, used recombination-mediated cassette exchange (RMCE) to introduce single-copy transgenes into specific locations in the Drosophila genome. In both cases, φC31 was used to catalyze recombination between its target sequences attP in the genome, and attB flanking the donor sequence. We generated cell lines de novo with a single attP-flanked cassette for recombination, whereas, Cherbas et al. introduced a single attP-flanked cassette into existing cell lines. In both approaches, a 2-drug selection scheme was used to select for cells with a single copy of the donor sequence inserted by RMCE and against cells with random integration of multiple copies. Here we describe the general advantages of using RMCE to introduce genes into fly cells, the different attributes of the 2 methods, and how future work could make use of other recombinases and CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to further enable genetic manipulation of Drosophila cells in vitro.
Keywords: cell lines, Drosophila, recombination-mediated cassette exchange, transgene
Introduction
Analysis of primary cultures and continuous cell lines has supported whole animal studies in Drosophila since the first primary cultures were developed in 1965 and the first cell lines were derived in 1969 (reviewed in1). The uniform morphology and physiology of cells from cell lines have made them a useful system for biochemical and molecular analyzes, including, for example, the relationship between structure and the function of proteins and genome-wide RNAi screens (reviewed in2).
The most commonly used fly cells are the embryonic cell lines S2, Kc167, and their derivatives.3,4 In addition to these, other cell lines have also been established from specific tissues such as the central nervous system,5 imaginal discs6,7 the larval blood system8, and the ovary.9 Currently, there are 163 Drosophila melanogaster cell lines available in the collection maintained at the Drosophila Genome Resource Center (DGRC). These include some lines derived by our group using activated Ras (RasV12) to drive cell proliferation.10-12 The method is efficient and also enables the generation of cell lines with specific genotypes.11,13 Here we describe the use of our method to derive cells that harbor a single site for insertion of transgenes.14 Using a different approach, the Cherbas group engineered existing cell lines to permit insertion of a single transgene.15 Both methods use Recombination-Mediated Cassette Exchange (RMCE) for transgene insertion. Here we highlight this work and how it will enable more refined analysis in Drosophila cells.
Current methods are hampered by variation in transgene number and insertion site
Drosophila cultured cells take up exogenous DNA by transfection or directly, as in the case of S2 cells that are phagocytic.16 Typically the DNA is a plasmid carrying a transgene encoding the product of interest. After transfection, the DNA is expressed transiently for a few days and gene products can be analyzed during this time window. Alternatively, a stable line can be established in which the transgene is inserted into the genome. To generate stable cell lines, the transgene is transfected together with a selectable marker gene, which can be on a separate plasmid. Resistance genes developed for mammalian cell culture system also typically work in Drosophila cells.17-21
In the stable lines, the transfected DNA is randomly integrated and there is a large variation in the number of transgenes that insert in a given cell. This variation in copy number stems from the formation of tandem arrays of the transfected DNA.16 These arrays can have abnormal chromatin structure that results in silencing of the transgene, as well as instability in the length of the array. Moreover, transgenes integrate randomly and are subject to different genomic contexts, which can also affect expression level.22
Site-specific systems to introduce transgenes at defined sites
To control copy number and insertion site, homologous recombination has been used extensively in mammalian cells in culture and in whole animals.23,24 In flies, homologous recombination is possible,25,26 but occurs at low frequency and transgenes have been typically inserted using transposons, such as P elements, piggyBac transposons, and Minos elements.27-29 These insert as a single copy with some bias to different regions in the genome.30 Recently, site-specific integration using the viral recombinases, φC31 and Cre/loxP have become the methods of choice for transgene insertion in Drosophila (reviewed in ref.31). φC31 catalyzes the recombination between 2 heterotypic sites attP and attB, converting them into attL and attR sites, which are no longer substrates for the recombinase, thus making the event nonreversible. In a variation of this approach, φC31 can be used to promote recombination between a cassette in the genome flanked by attP sequences and a donor cassette flanked by attB sites. The donor cassette is inserted and the genomic cassette is eliminated resulting in so-called Recombination-Mediated Cassette Exchange (RMCE).32 Recombination mediated by φC31 is an efficient process that requires a small recognition site (< 40 bp for each attP or attB site) and allows the insertion of long donor sequences (at least 146 KB).32-34 attP sites, including those amenable to RMCE, have been introduced into multiple sites in the genome using transposable elements.35,36 φC31-mediated recombination, including RMCE, has been demonstrated in S2 cells,33,37 but a robust selection system to purify only those cells that have undergone RMCE had not been developed until our work and that of the Cherbas group.14,15
Generating cell lines with cassettes for RMCE in Drosophila cell culture
We developed 2 cell lines using the expression of UAS-RasV12 with Act5C-Gal4 that also harbor an attP-flanked cassette (Fig. 1A). The lines are called Ras-attP-L1 and L2. The cassette (attP. w+. attP), generated by Bateman et al., is in the taranis locus and has been used for transgene expression in flies (Fig. 1B).32 Cherbas et al. took an alternative approach and introduced an attP-flanked Act-5C>GFP cassette into Kc167 and Sg4 (an S2 derivative) cells using P-element transformation (Fig. 1D). The lines are called, for example, Kc167-PP-93E, which identifies the parental line and the insertion site (Fig. 1E). They generated multiple lines with a single cassette, which provide a variety of genomic sites for RMCE.
Figure 1.
Generation of cell lines with an attP-flanked cassette for insertion of transgenes by RMCE. A-C, Manivannan et al.; D-F, Cherbas et al. (A) Flies with an Act5C-Gal4 gene were crossed to flies with a UAS-RasV12 gene, which also have an attP-flanked cassette (attP.w+.attP). In the progeny, Act5C-Gal4 induces expression of UAS-RasV12. Primary cultures derived from these embryos gave rise to the Ras-attP-L1 and Ras-attP-L2 cell lines. (B) Schematic of the attP.w+.attP cassette at taranis (tara) locus. (C) In Ras-attP-L1 and -L2 cells, Act5C-Gal4 induces UAS-genes (DHFR, GFP, TK) and a transgene of interest (your favorite gene, UAS-yfg). Cells expressing DHFR are selected by MTX and cells expressing TK are killed by GCV. (D) P-element transformation was used to insert an attP-flanked cassette (attP-GFP-attP) into established cell lines, Sg4 (an S2 derivative) and Kc167. Clones of cells with a single insertion of the cassette were selected. Seventeen independent lines with different insertion sites were generated. (E) Schematic showing 2 different attP-flanked cassettes used. Top, cassette with eGFP flanked by attP sites (PP). Bottom, similar cassette with the addition of insulator sequences introduced as a part of the P-element (IPPI). (F) In the Sg4 and Kc cells, the DHFR and the TK genes are encoded by transgenes with an Act5C promoter. DHFR, dihydrofolate reductase; GFP, green fluorescent protein; MTX, Methotrexate; GCV, Ganciclovir; TK, Thymidine kinase.
There are advantages to both types of cell lines. The lines we developed are diploid for the major autosomes (second and third chromosomes) and heterozygous for the attP-cassette, which is on the third chromosome. There are variations in the number of the sex chromosomes and the small fourth chromosomes, but the near normal karyotype obviates uncertainty about the number of alleles for most genes. If an experiment requires information about the ratio of endogenous to transgene-encoded product, this could be an advantage over S2 and Kc cells, which have polyploid karyotypes and variable numbers of alleles.38 Proliferation of the Ras-attP-L1 and -L2 cells depends upon expression of UAS-RasV12 driven by the Actin5C-Gal4 gene. The presence of the Actin5C-Gal4 gene in the cells allowed us to devise a selection scheme based on selectable markers driven by Gal4-induced transcription and also means that the cells can be used to express transgenes from the collections of UAS-regulated constructs available for many genes.39,40 Cherbas et al. used Kc and Sg4 cells, which have the advantage of being well-characterized cell lines that have been widely used and for which the transcriptome has been determined.38,41-46 The absence of the Act5C-Gal4 gene also means there is the flexibility to express genes with other Gal4 drivers.
Selection for RMCE events in Drosophila tissue culture cells
The key feature of RMCE is that only sequences within the attB-flanked cassette are inserted allowing counter selection for cells randomly inserting a whole vector, which has a toxicity factor in the backbone. Following precedents in mammalian systems, we and Cherbas et al., designed vectors that include a dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) gene within the cassette. A single copy of DHFR provides resistance to methotrexate (MTX). We used UAS-DHFR, which is induced by Act5C-Gal4 already present in the cells (Fig. 1C), whereas, Cherbas et al. used DHFR directly fused to an Act5C promoter (Fig. 1F). Only cells that integrate the DHFR gene grow in the presence of MTX, however, cells with a random insertion of the donor plasmid are also resistant to MTX. To select against these cells, there is a thymidine kinase (TK) gene in the backbone of the donor plasmid. This gene is excluded only in cells with RMCE events (Fig. 2). Ganciclovir (GCV) is an antiviral drug that is converted into a toxic product by TK, correspondingly, any cell with an active TK gene (UAS-TK, in the Ras-attP-L1 and -L2 cells, and Act5C-TK in the Sg4 and Kc derivatives) will die (Fig. 2).
Figure 2.
Selection of cells with single transgenes inserted by RMCE. (A) Ras-attP-L1 and Ras-attP-L2 cells are transfected with an attB-donor plasmid encoding the selectable markers (DHFR and TK), GFP, and your favorite gene (yfg). The donor plasmid can insert by RMCE or non-specifically and cells with both types of inserts are GFP positive and resistant to MTX. Non-transfected cells (gray) die. In the presence of GCV only the cells that have undergone RMCE survive because the TK gene is excluded. A polyclonal line or colonies of cells with a single transgene are selected. One orientation is shown, but both are possible because the attP sites are indirect repeats. (B) Sg4 or Kc167 cells with the genomic cassette, which includes a GFP gene, are transfected with an attB-donor plasmid encoding the selectable markers (DHFR and TK), and yfg. The donor plasmid can insert by RMCE or non-specifically. Cells in which RMCE has occurred are GFP negative and resistant to MTX. Non-transfected cells and cells with non-specific insertions are GFP positive. The non-transfected cells die. In the presence of GCV cells that have undergone RMCE survive because the TK gene is excluded. However, some GFP positive cells, with non-specific insertions, survive and a subsequent FACS step is required to purify cells with a single transgene inserted by RMCE. Only a single orientation is possible because the attP sites are direct repeats.
Ras-attP-L1 and -L2 cells that have undergone RMCE can be selected simply by the 2-drug combination (Fig. 2A). In contrast, the Sg4-PP and Kc-PP cells do not express the TK gene at sufficiently high levels from the Act5C promoter and require fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) to derive a pure population (Fig. 2B). This difference in the level of TK expression is most likely because the Gal4-UAS system amplifies transcription of UAS-TK. The Sg4-PP and Kc-PP cells in which RMCE has occurred lose the GFP gene and can be sorted as GFP negative (Fig. 2B). After RMCE, each system provides comparable efficiency and requires about 6–8 weeks to purify a cell population with a single transgene insertion.
Using donor vectors for RMCE and expression of your favorite gene
The donor vector we developed has a multiple cloning site (pMCS-Donor) to allow insertion of transgenes either with a UAS-promoter or an independent promoter. We tested the vector with 3 genes (Tubulin, Jupiter, and Cas9) and were able to generate stable cells lines that expressed the proteins.14 Cherbas et al added a Gateway Cloning Cassette that will allow users to clone existing ORF collections into the vector.15
In the Ras-attP-L1 and L2 lines, the genomic cassette is flanked by indirect repeats and transgenes can be inserted in either orientation. We tested whether this influenced gene expression and found that levels of GFP were similar, as determined by western blot analysis, from a transgene inserted in either orientation.14 For reasons we do not understand, however, insertions occur predominantly in one orientation, so that the cell population is essentially comprised of cells with a single orientation.14 Moreover, the Ras-attP-L1 cells are strongly adherent and colonies resulting from single RMCE events can be cloned.14 In the Sg4 and Kc cells, the genomic cassette is flanked by direct repeats and transgenes can only insert in one orientation.15
RMCE and re-engineering Drosophila cells in culture
The major advantage of RMCE is that it allows the generation of stable lines expressing a single transgene from the same genomic location. This is ideal for structure-function relationship studies because it eliminates variation in expression levels between lines. With the 2 systems, researchers can choose either the more familiar Sg4/Kc cells or use the lines we developed that allow selection without FACS and have a more normal karyotype. All the lines and vectors are available at the DGRC.
The collection of lines that Cherbas et al., generated provide a range of possible insertion sites, however, these are not directed to particular sites within the genome. In subsequent work, using any cell line of choice, CRISPR/Cas9 could be used to insert an attP-flanked cassette at a particular site (and could simultaneously inactivate the target gene). RMCE using this entry point would allow reengineering of the site, as has been done in flies.47-49 Currently, the selection schemes for insertion of the sequence by CRISPR/Cas9 are not very robust, but targeting multiple sites, followed by cloning and molecular characterization should allow for targeting of all alleles in a given cell line.50-53
With the system we developed it is possible to derive cells of a particular genotype simply by constructing the line from flies with the desired alleles. We have developed a number of mutant cell lines demonstrating the feasibility of this approach.10,11,13,54,55 This may be useful for complex genotypes for which manipulation in the cells by CRISPR/Cas9 may be impractical. We also expect the system can be used to generate cells lines of a particular lineage by deriving lines from the cell-type specific expression of RasV12. Any such lines developed should include an attP-flanked cassette that will allow the subsequent introduction of transgenes by RMCE thus enabling, for example, the analysis of Huntington disease by comparison of lines expressing different mutant alleles in a single copy at the same site.
In closing, we expect that there will be increased interest in studying biological questions in Drosophila cell lines because RMCE and other recombination systems will enable more sophisticated and controlled somatic cell genetics.
Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
References
- [1].Echalier G. 3 - Drosophila Continuous Cell Lines. Drosophila Cells in Culture. New York: Academic Press, 1997, 129-86. [Google Scholar]
- [2].Cherbas L, Gong L. Cell lines. Methods 2014; 68:74-81; PMID:24434506; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.01.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Schneider I. Cell lines derived from late embryonic stages of Drosophila melanogaster. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1972; 27:353-65; PMID:4625067 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Echalier G, Ohanessian A. [Isolation, in tissue culture, of Drosophila melangaster cell lines]. C R Acad Sci Hebd Seances Acad Sci D 1969; 268:1771-3; PMID:4976834 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Ui K, Nishihara S, Sakuma M, Togashi S, Ueda R, Miyata Y, Miyake T. Newly established cell lines from Drosophila larval CNS express neural specific characteristics. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 1994; 30A:209-16; PMID:8069443; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/BF02632042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Currie DA, Milner MJ, Evans CW. The growth and differentiation in vitro of leg and wing imaginal disc cells from Drosophila melanogaster. Development 1988; 102:805-14. [Google Scholar]
- [7].Ui K, Ueda R, Miyake T. Cell lines from imaginal discs of Drosophila melanogaster. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 1987; 23:707-11; PMID:3117765; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/BF02620984 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Gateff E, Gissmann L, Shrestha R, Plus N, Pfister H, Schroder J, Hausen HZ. Characterization of two tumorous blood cell lines of Drosophila melanogaster and the viruses they contain. Invertebrate Systems in Vitro Fifth International Conference on Invertebrate Tissue Culture, Rigi-Kaltbad; 1980:517-33. [Google Scholar]
- [9].Niki Y, Yamaguchi T, Mahowald AP. Establishment of stable cell lines of Drosophila germ-line stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:16325-30; PMID:17056713; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.0607435103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Simcox A, Mitra S, Truesdell S, Paul L, Chen T, Butchar JP, Justiniano S. Efficient genetic method for establishing Drosophila cell lines unlocks the potential to create lines of specific genotypes. PLoS Genet 2008; 4:e1000142; PMID:18670627; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Simcox AA, Austin CL, Jacobsen TL, Jafar-Nejad H. Drosophila embryonic ‘fibroblasts’: extending mutant analysis in vitro. Fly (Austin) 2008; 2:306-9; PMID:19077546; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4161/fly.7427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Dequeant ML, Fagegaltier D, Hu Y, Spirohn K, Simcox A, Hannon GJ, Perrimon N. Discovery of progenitor cell signatures by time-series synexpression analysis during Drosophila embryonic cell immortalization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015; 112:12974-9; PMID:26438832; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.1517729112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Lee HG, Kahn TG, Simcox A, Schwartz YB, Pirrotta V. Genome-wide activities of Polycomb complexes control pervasive transcription. Genome Res 2015; 25:1170-81; PMID:25986499; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1101/gr.188920.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Manivannan SN, Jacobsen TL, Lyon P, Selvaraj B, Halpin P, Simcox A. Targeted integration of single-copy transgenes in Drosophila melanogaster tissue-culture cells using recombination-mediated cassette exchange. Genetics 2015; 201:1319-28; PMID:26500255; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1534/genetics.115.181230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Cherbas L, Hackney J, Gong L, Salzer C, Mauser E, Zhang D, Cherbas P. Tools for targeted genome engineering of established Drosophila cell lines. Genetics 2015; 201:1307-18; PMID:26450921; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1534/genetics.115.181610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Cherbas L, Moss R, Cherbas P. Transformation techniques for Drosophila cell lines. Methods Cell Biol 1994; 44:161-79; PMID:7707950; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S0091-679X(08)60912-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Rio DC, Rubin GM. Transformation of cultured Drosophila melanogaster cells with a dominant selectable marker. Mol Cell Biol 1985; 5:1833-8; PMID:3018529; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1128/MCB.5.8.1833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Makridou P, Burnett C, Landy T, Howard K. Hygromycin B-selected cell lines from GAL4-regulated pUAST constructs. Genesis 2003; 36:83-7; PMID:12820169; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/gene.10196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Iwaki T, Figuera M, Ploplis VA, Castellino FJ. Rapid selection of Drosophila S2 cells with the puromycin resistance gene. Biotechniques 2003; 35:482-4; 6; PMID:14513552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Bourouis M, Jarry B. Vectors containing a prokaryotic dihydrofolate reductase gene transform Drosophila cells to methotrexate-resistance. EMBO J 1983; 2:1099-104; PMID:6194991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Van der Straten A, Johansen H, Rosenberg M, Sweet RW. Introduction and constitutive expression of gene products in cultured Drosophila cells using hygromycin B selection. Methods Mol Cell Biol 1989; 1:1-8; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1091/mbc.1.1.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Spradling AC, Rubin GM. The effect of chromosomal position on the expression of the Drosophila xanthine dehydrogenase gene. Cell 1983; 34:47-57; PMID:6309411; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90135-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Branda CS, Dymecki SM. Talking about a revolution: The impact of site-specific recombinases on genetic analyses in mice. Dev Cell 2004; 6:7-28; PMID:14723844; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00399-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Sorrell DA, Kolb AF. Targeted modification of mammalian genomes. Biotechnol Adv 2005; 23:431-69; PMID:15925473; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2005.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Rong YS, Golic KG. Gene targeting by homologous recombination in Drosophila. Science 2000; 288:2013-8; PMID:10856208; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1126/science.288.5473.2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Golic KG. Site-specific recombination between homologous chromosomes in Drosophila. Science 1991; 252:958-61; PMID:2035025; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1126/science.2035025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Thibault ST, Singer MA, Miyazaki WY, Milash B, Dompe NA, Singh CM, Buchholz R, Demsky M, Fawcett R, Francis-Lang HL, et al.. A complementary transposon tool kit for Drosophila melanogaster using P and piggyBac. Nat Genet 2004; 36:283-7; PMID:14981521; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/ng1314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Metaxakis A, Oehler S, Klinakis A, Savakis C. Minos as a genetic and genomic tool in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2005; 171:571-81; PMID:15972463; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1534/genetics.105.041848 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Ryder E, Russell S. Transposable elements as tools for genomics and genetics in Drosophila. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 2003; 2:57-71; PMID:15239944; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/bfgp/2.1.57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Bellen HJ, Levis RW, He Y, Carlson JW, Evans-Holm M, Bae E, Kim J, Metaxakis A, Savakis C, Schulze KL, et al.. The Drosophila gene disruption project: progress using transposons with distinctive site specificities. Genetics 2011; 188:731-43; PMID:21515576; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1534/genetics.111.126995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Venken KJ, Bellen HJ. Transgenesis upgrades for Drosophila melanogaster. Development 2007; 134:3571-84; PMID:17905790; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1242/dev.005686 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Bateman JR, Lee AM, Wu CT. Site-specific transformation of Drosophila via phiC31 integrase-mediated cassette exchange. Genetics 2006; 173:769-77; PMID:16547094; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1534/genetics.106.056945 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Groth AC, Fish M, Nusse R, Calos MP. Construction of transgenic Drosophila by using the site-specific integrase from phage phiC31. Genetics 2004; 166:1775-82; PMID:15126397; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1534/genetics.166.4.1775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Venken KJ, Bellen HJ. Genome-wide manipulations of Drosophila melanogaster with transposons, Flp recombinase, and PhiC31 integrase. Methods Mol Biol 2012; 859:203-28; PMID:22367874; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/978-1-61779-603-6_12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Nagarkar-Jaiswal S, Lee PT, Campbell ME, Chen K, Anguiano-Zarate S, Gutierrez MC, Busby T, Lin WW, He Y, Schulze KL, et al.. A library of MiMICs allows tagging of genes and reversible, spatial and temporal knockdown of proteins in Drosophila. Elife 2015; 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Venken KJ, Schulze KL, Haelterman NA, Pan H, He Y, Evans-Holm M, Carlson JW, Levis RW, Spradling AC, Hoskins RA, et al.. MiMIC: a highly versatile transposon insertion resource for engineering Drosophila melanogaster genes. Nat Methods 2011; 8:737-43; PMID:21985007; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nmeth.1662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Neumuller RA, Wirtz-Peitz F, Lee S, Kwon Y, Buckner M, Hoskins RA, Venken KJ, Bellen HJ, Mohr SE, Perrimon N. Stringent analysis of gene function and protein-protein interactions using fluorescently tagged genes. Genetics 2012; 190:931-40; PMID:22174071; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1534/genetics.111.136465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Lee H, McManus CJ, Cho DY, Eaton M, Renda F, Somma MP, Cherbas L, May G, Powell S, Zhang D, et al.. DNA copy number evolution in Drosophila cell lines. Genome Biol 2014; 15:R70; PMID:25262759; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/gb-2014-15-8-r70 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Yu C, Wan KH, Hammonds AS, Stapleton M, Carlson JW, Celniker SE. Development of expression-ready constructs for generation of proteomic libraries. Methods Mol Biol 2011; 723:257-72; PMID:21370071; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/978-1-61779-043-0_17] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Bischof J, Bjorklund M, Furger E, Schertel C, Taipale J, Basler K. A versatile platform for creating a comprehensive UAS-ORFeome library in Drosophila. Development 2013; 140:2434-42; PMID:23637332; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1242/dev.088757 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Brown JB, Boley N, Eisman R, May GE, Stoiber MH, Duff MO, Booth BW, Wen J, Park S, Suzuki AM, et al.. Diversity and dynamics of the Drosophila transcriptome. Nature 2014; 512:393-9; PMID:24670639; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nature12962 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Wen J, Mohammed J, Bortolamiol-Becet D, Tsai H, Robine N, Westholm JO, Ladewig E, Dai Q, Okamura K, Flynt AS, et al.. Diversity of miRNAs, siRNAs, and piRNAs across 25 Drosophila cell lines. Genome Res 2014; 24:1236-50; PMID:24985917; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1101/gr.161554.113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Zurovec M, Dolezal T, Gazi M, Pavlova E, Bryant PJ. Adenosine deaminase-related growth factors stimulate cell proliferation in Drosophila by depleting extracellular adenosine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99:4403-8; PMID:11904370; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.062059699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].DasGupta R, Kaykas A, Moon RT, Perrimon N. Functional genomic analysis of the Wnt-wingless signaling pathway. Science 2005; 308:826-33; PMID:15817814; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1109374 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Williams BR, Bateman JR, Novikov ND, Wu CT. Disruption of topoisomerase II perturbs pairing in drosophila cell culture. Genetics 2007; 177:31-46; PMID:17890361; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1534/genetics.107.076356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Liu T, Sims D, Baum B. Parallel RNAi screens across different cell lines identify generic and cell type-specific regulators of actin organization and cell morphology. Genome Biol 2009; 10:R26; PMID:19265526; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r26 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Baena-Lopez LA, Alexandre C, Mitchell A, Pasakarnis L, Vincent JP. Accelerated homologous recombination and subsequent genome modification in Drosophila. Development 2013; 140:4818-25; PMID:24154526; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1242/dev.100933 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Gratz SJ, Ukken FP, Rubinstein CD, Thiede G, Donohue LK, Cummings AM, O'Connor-Giles KM. Highly specific and efficient CRISPR/Cas9-catalyzed homology-directed repair in Drosophila. Genetics 2014; 196:961-71; PMID:24478335; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1534/genetics.113.160713 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Zhang X, Koolhaas WH, Schnorrer F. A versatile two-step CRISPR- and RMCE-based strategy for efficient genome engineering in Drosophila. G3 (Bethesda) 2014; 4:2409-18; PMID:25324299; http://dx.doi.org/full_text [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Bottcher R, Hollmann M, Merk K, Nitschko V, Obermaier C, Philippou-Massier J, Wieland I, Gaul U, Forstemann K. Efficient chromosomal gene modification with CRISPR/cas9 and PCR-based homologous recombination donors in cultured Drosophila cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:e89; PMID:24748663; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/nar/gku289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Bassett AR, Kong L, Liu JL. A genome-wide CRISPR library for high-throughput genetic screening in Drosophila cells. J Genet Genomics 2015; 42:301-9; PMID:26165496; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jgg.2015.03.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Bassett AR, Tibbit C, Ponting CP, Liu JL. Mutagenesis and homologous recombination in Drosophila cell lines using CRISPR/Cas9. Biol Open 2014; 3:42-9; PMID:24326186; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1242/bio.20137120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Housden BE, Valvezan AJ, Kelley C, Sopko R, Hu Y, Roesel C, Lin S, Buckner M, Tao R, Yilmazel B, et al.. Identification of potential drug targets for tuberous sclerosis complex by synthetic screens combining CRISPR-based knockouts with RNAi. Sci Signal 2015; 8:rs9; PMID:26350902; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1126/scisignal.aab3729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Simcox A. Progress towards Drosophila epithelial cell culture. Methods Mol Biol 2013; 945:1-11; PMID:23097097; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/978-1-62703-125-7_1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Justiniano SE, Mathew A, Mitra S, Manivannan SN, Simcox A. Loss of the tumor suppressor Pten promotes proliferation of Drosophila melanogaster cells in vitro and gives rise to continuous cell lines. PLoS One 2012; 7:e31417; PMID:22363644; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0031417 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


