Skip to main content
PMC home page
Hip & Pelvis logoLink to Hip & Pelvis
. 2014 Jun 30;26(2):92–98. doi: 10.5371/hp.2014.26.2.92

Meta-analysis of the Incidence and Risk Factors for Squeaking after Primary Ceramic-on-ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty in Asian Patients

Tae-Hun Lee *, Young-Wan Moon *, Seung-Jae Lim *, Youn-Soo Park *,✉
PMCID: PMC4971122  PMID: 27536565

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the squeaking incidence and risk factors after primary ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty (THA) in Asian patients using meta-analysis.

Materials and Methods

We performed a meta-analysis of published data on the squeaking incidence and risk factors from 2000 to 2013. Eight studies in Asians were analyzed for both squeaking incidence and risk factors and 25 studies in Western patients were analyzed for squeaking incidence. The data collected were: patient factors, surgical factors and implantation factors.

Results

The overall incidence of hip squeaking was 2.7% in Asians and 3.1% in Westerners. This difference was not statistically significant. The only significant risk factor was an increase in the acetabular cup abduction angle. Of the factors, the cup abduction angle was the only significant risk factor for the occurrence rate of squeaking, and the occurrence rate tended to increase with increasing angle.

Conclusion

The incidence of squeaking in Asians after primary ceramic-on-ceramic THA is 2.7% and is similar to that in Westerners. The increased cup abduction angle is associated with squeaking; therefore, surgeons should be careful not to implant the cup at a too steep abduction angle.

Keywords: Total hip arthroplasty, Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing, Squeaking, Noise, Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) using ceramic-on-ceramic bearings is characterized by a low wearing rate, no release of metal ions, resistance to scratches, and hydrophilic properties, and thus has a better clinical prognosis than metal-on-polyethylene bearing surfaces1). Recently, however, a serious clinical problem has emerged-the occurrence of squeaking following THA using ceramic-on-ceramic bearings-which negatively influences patients' satisfaction2). When patients do not complain about pain and mechanical symptoms, most squeaking cases are just followed up without any additional treatments, but there is a report that squeaking accompanying pain might be related to ceramic joints3).

Several causes of squeaking can be classified into three categories: implantation factors, patient factors, and surgical factors. The implantation factors include the shape of prosthesis and impingement by an elevated-rim liner4), whereas the patient factors are young age, heavy weight, and tall patients. Lastly, the surgical factors are malposition of the acetabular cup and reduction of soft tissue tension5).

A few reports have suggested that the occurrence rates of impingements and ceramic fractures are higher in Asian populations than in Westerners, possibly due to different somatotypes as well as life styles. To the best of our knowledge, however, no studies have addressed the occurrence rate of squeaking and its risk factors in an Asian population.

The main objective of this meta-analysis was to determine the occurrence rate of squeaking following THA in Asians and to compare it with that in Westerners. In addition, we intended to find the risk factors for squeaking in Asians.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature (publication years, 2000-2013) reporting the results of primary THA using ceramic-on-ceramic bearings was searched using PubMed and the Embase database with the following key words: 1) hip AND squeak, 2) squeaking AND hip, 3) ceramic AND hip AND squeak, and 4) ceramic AND hip AND noise. Overlapping publications and those written in languages other than English were excluded; a total of 132 publications was finally included in our study. Of these, only 8 studies dealing with Asian populations were included in the meta-analysis6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13): 4 Korean, 1 Chinese, 1 Japanese, and 2 Taiwanese studies (Fig. 1). Studies that involved Westerners (n=25) were analyzed for the occurrence rate of squeaking2,4,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36). Although our literature searches were not limited to squeaking, but also included all types of sounds coming from a hip joint such as clicking, popping, clunking, and grinding, only studies dealing with squeaking (defined as a high-pitched audible sound) were included and analyzed (Table 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Literature search in databse.

Table 1.

Studies Included in the Meta-analysis in Asian

graphic file with name hp-26-92-i001.jpg

Open in a new tab

The total number of patients, the number of patients experiencing noise, the number of patients experiencing squeaking, and the length of the follow-up period were collected and analyzed for the impact of implantation factors, patient factors, and surgical factors. Patient factors included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and diagnosis; surgical factors were surgical approaches, and position of the acetabular cup (abduction and anteversion). Implantation factors were the types of the acetabular cup, the size of the femoral head, and the types of femoral stem. The impacts of sex, diagnosis, and surgical approaches on the occurrence rate of squeaking were stratified and analyzed using the ratio of male to female patients, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and lateral approach, respectively. The types of acetabular cup were classified into either a metallic-rim acetabular cup or others. Lastly, the types of femoral stem were classified into a titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy stem and a titanium-molybdenum-zirconium-iron alloy stem.

We analyzed the squeaking occurrence rate only for Westerners because of considerable variability in conventional squeaking incidence analysis, which makes it difficult to compare the occurrence rates directly; the total number of patients and that of patients experiencing squeaking were collected to analyze the occurrence rate.

Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (CMA, version 2.0; Statistical Solutions, Cork, Ireland) was used for statistical analysis. For analysis of the occurrence rate, heterogeneity between studies included in the meta-analysis was analyzed. The fixed effects model was applied if heterogeneity was <50%; otherwise, the random effects model was applied considering the variations among studies. A meta-regression analysis was used to assess the correlation between the squeaking occurrence rate and respective factors.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis included a total of 1,152 cases of primary THA using ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in Asian subjects. The average age was 43.9 years; 495 subjects were male and 657 subjects were female; the average BMI was 23.8 kg/m2 (range, 22.0-26.0 kg/m2). The average follow-up period was 87 months (range, 29-139 months). The most common diagnosis was avascular necrosis of the femoral head (563 cases) followed by degenerative arthritis, hip joint dysplasia, and rheumatoid arthritis. Of 59 subjects (5.1%) who experienced noise, squeaking was reported in 14 cases (1.2%). For the analysis of the noise occurrence rate, the random effects model was applied because of high heterogeneity between studies (90.5%); in contrast, the fixed effects model was used for the analysis of the squeaking occurrence rate given its low heterogeneity between studies (46.4%). We found that the occurrence rates for noise and squeaking were 4.5% and 2.7%, respectively (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Summary of result of squeaking incidence in Asian.

Correlation analysis, which included 8 studies6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13), revealed that patient factors, i.e., age (P=0.55), BMI (I=0.07) , and sex (P=0.29), did not influence the occurrence rate of squeaking. Most surgical factors, i.e. surgical approaches (P=0.11), diagnosis (P=0.10), cup anteversion (P=0.26), as well as implantation factors, i.e., the size of the femoral head (P=0.72), types of the acetabular cup (P=0.58), and types of femoral stems (P=0.13) had no significant impact on the occurrence rate of squeaking. Of the surgical factors, only the cup abduction angle was a significant factor for the occurrence rate of squeaking (P=0.0063). The average abduction angle of the acetabular cup was 45.3°, and the occurrence rate tended to increase with increasing angle (Table 2).

Table 2.

Summary of Result of Incidence Factor Meta-analysis

graphic file with name hp-26-92-i002.jpg

Open in a new tab

Our analysis of the occurrence rate of squeaking in Westerners included 13,643 cases of primary THA using ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. The average age of the patients was 53.5 years; squeaking was reported in 401 cases. Because of high heterogeneity between studies (92.63%), the random effects model was applied and showed the occurrence rate of 3.1% (Fig. 3). In addition, we included 33 studies on both Asian and Western populations; their overall heterogeneity was 90.68%. The mixed-effect analysis revealed the squeaking occurrence rate of 2.7%. There was no statistically significant difference between Asians and Westerners in the incidence rate (P=0.20).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Summary of result of squeaking incidence in Western.

DISCUSSION

THA using ceramic-on-ceramic bearings is characterized by low wearing rate, no release of metal ions, resistance to scratches, and great biocompatibility. Furthermore, compared to other articular surfaces, ceramic-on-ceramic bearings are more durable and thus are widely used for young and active patients15). But they should be chosen carefully, as they frequently cause noise and abnormal sounds like squeaking, which makes patients' daily life difficult and often requires re-operations.

The proposed mechanisms responsible for squeaking include mismatching between articular surfaces37), "stick and slip" occurring due to microseparation of the articular surfaces38), destruction of fluid film lubrication due to "edge loading"39), femoral neck-acetabular component rim impingement40), impingement owing to abnormal position of the acetabular cup2), short femoral neck17), and "dry joint" environment41).

Of the proposed mechanisms, "edge loading" is one of the most important, and we expected that the Asian population would have a higher occurrence rate of squeaking because of a wider range of motion and likely to have more impingement when the hip joint is deep bending. Multiple studies have reported that squeaking occurs when the hip joint is bending or the subject is sitting down or standing up5,18,20). Similarly, one of the studies included in our meta-analysis reported that bending the hip joint more than 70° or extensive internal rotation may cause squeaking8). Unexpectedly, the occurrence rate of squeaking in Asians was found to be 2.7%, which is not significantly different from values reported by previous studies, which ranged from 0.7% to 22.9%. Our result is similar to a previous meta-analysis, which reported the occurrence rate of squeaking of 2.4%42). Taken together, these data indicate that a wider range of motion in Asians does not necessarily increase the risk of impingements between implants that cause squeaking.

In the present study, we found that none of the patient factors was significantly correlated with the occurrence rate of squeaking, whereas other studies have demonstrated that age, height and body weight are very likely risk factors for squeaking. In particular, young, tall, and heavy patients are known to have a higher risk of squeaking5). One study concluded that male patients are more likely to have squeaking7), whereas another study reported that young patients with a wide range of motion have a higher noise incidence11).

Our correlation analysis between surgical factors and squeaking revealed that the wide abduction angle elevates the risk of squeaking. Walter et al.5) defined the ideal angles of the acetabular cup for abduction and anteversion as 45°±10° and 25°±10°, respectively. None of the studies included in our meta-analysis reported the abduction angle of the acetabular cup or surgical approaches as risk factors. Lastly, implantation factors also did not influence the occurrence rate of squeaking. When a Trident acetabular cup (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ, USA) was used, the occurrence rate of squeaking was elevated; this might be caused by a difference between an elevated metal rim (a specific feature of the product) and the lock mechanism. On the other hand, when Accolade and Omnifit femoral stems (both from Stryker) were compared using the same Trident acetabular cup, the use of Accolade resulted in a higher incidence rate of squeaking. Such differences might be due to titanium alloys with lower modulus of elasticity43).

There are several limitations to the present study. Firstly, it is difficult to extrapolate the results in general due to a small number of studies included in our meta-analysis. However, the occurrence rate of squeaking is inherently low, which makes it necessary to use a wide range of studies in the analysis to identify the risk factors; furthermore, it is worth noting that we performed the meta-analysis exclusively for the Asian population. Secondly, we were able to retrieve results only from the published literature, which may lead to publication bias, including issues with data deviations as well as accuracy, which may lead to biased conclusions.

CONCLUSION

In the Asian population, the squeaking occurrence rate following primary ceramic-on-ceramic THA was found to be 2.7%; this was similar to the occurrence rate for Westerners (3.1%). The analysis of risk factors revealed that the larger abduction angle of the acetabular cup was associated with the higher occurrence rate of squeaking.

References

  • 1.Sedel L. Evolution of alumina-on-alumina implants: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;(379):48–54. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200010000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Walter WL, Waters TS, Gillies M, et al. Squeaking hips. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 4):102–111. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Abdel MP, Heyse TJ, Elpers ME, et al. Ceramic liner fractures presenting as squeaking after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:27–31. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ecker TM, Robbins C, van Flandern G, et al. no cause for concern. Orthopedics. 2008;31:875–876. 884. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20080901-11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Walter WL, O'toole GC, Walter WK, Ellis A, Zicat BA. Squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic hips: the importance of acetabular component orientation. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:496–503. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Baek SH, Kim SY. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with alumina bearings in patients younger than fifty with femoral head osteonecrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1314–1320. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Choi IY, Kim YS, Hwang KT, Kim YH. Incidence and factors associated with squeaking in alumina-on-alumina THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:3234–3239. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1394-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kim YH, Choi Y, Kim JS. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with ceramic-on-ceramic bearing in patients younger than 45 years with femoral-head osteonecrosis. Int Orthop. 2010;34:1123–1127. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0878-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cai P, Hu Y, Xie J. Large-diameter Delta ceramic-on-ceramic versus common-sized ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings in THA. Orthopedics. 2012;35:e1307–e1313. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120822-14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chen WM, Wu PK, Chen CF, Huang CK, Liu CL, Chen TH. No significant squeaking in total hip arthroplasty: a series of 413 hips in the Asian people. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:1575–1579. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kuo FC, Liu HC, Chen WS, Wang JW. Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: incidence and risk factors of bearing surface-related noises in 125 patients. Orthopedics. 2012;35:e1581–e1585. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20121023-12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yoon HJ, Yoo JJ, Yoon KS, Koo KH, Kim HJ. Alumina-on-alumina THA performed in patients younger than 30 years: a 10-year minimum followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:3530–3536. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2493-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tsukada S, Wakui M, Matsueda M. Uncemented third-generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty using metal acetabular shell with direct taper locking liner. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133:861–868. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1724-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lusty PJ, Tai CC, Sew-Hoy RP, Walter WL, Walter WK, Zicat BA. Third-generation alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2676–2683. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Capello WN, D'Antonio JA, Feinberg JR, Manley MT, Naughton M. Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: update. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(7 Suppl):39–43. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Garcia-Rey E, Murcia-Mazoó A, Blanco-Pozo A, Martlí E. Alumina-on-alumina in THA: a multicenter prospective study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:309–316. doi: 10.1007/s11999-007-0042-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Keurentjes JC, Kuipers RM, Wever DJ, Schreurs BW. High incidence of squeaking in THAs with alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1438–1443. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0177-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Restrepo C, Parvizi J, Kurtz SM, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. The noisy ceramic hip: is component malpositioning the cause? J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:643–649. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Greene JW, Malkani AL, Kolisek FR, Jessup NM, Baker DL. Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(6 Suppl):15–18. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jarrett CA, Ranawat AS, Bruzzone M, Blum YC, Rodriguez JA, Ranawat CS. The squeaking hip: a phenomenon of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:1344–1349. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Boyer P, Huten D, Loriaut P, Lestrat V, Jeanrot C, Massin P. Is alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings total hip replacement the right choice in patients younger than 50 years of age? A 7- to 15-year follow-up study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96:616–622. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hamilton WG, McAuley JP, Dennis DA, Murphy JA, Blumenfeld TJ, Politi J. THA with Delta ceramic on ceramic: results of a multicenter investigational device exemption trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:358–366. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1091-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mai K, Verioti C, Ezzet KA, Copp SN, Walker RH, Colwell CW., Jr Incidence of 'squeaking' after ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:413–417. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1083-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cogan A, Nizard R, Sedel L. Occurrence of noise in alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty. A survey on 284 consecutive hips. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011;97:206–210. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hsu JE, Kinsella SD, Garino JP, Lee GC. Ten-year follow-up of patients younger than 50 years with modern ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty. 2011;22:229–233. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mesko JW, D'Antonio JA, Capello WN, Bierbaum BE, Naughton M. Ceramic-on-ceramic hip outcome at a 5- to 10-year interval: has it lived up to its expectations? J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:172–177. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.04.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Parvizi J, Adeli B, Wong JC, Restrepo C, Rothman RH. A squeaky reputation: the problem may be design-dependent. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:1598–1605. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1777-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schroder D, Bornstein L, Bostrom MP, Nestor BJ, Padgett DE, Westrich GH. Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: incidence of instability and noise. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:437–442. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1574-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sexton SA, Yeung E, Jackson MP, et al. The role of patient factors and implant position in squeaking of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:439–442. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B4.25707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stafford GH, Islam SU, Witt JD. Early to mid-term results of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement: analysis of bearing-surface-related complications. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:1017–1020. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B8.26505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Steppacher SD, Ecker TM, Tannast M, Murphy SB. Absence of osteolysis in uncemented alumina ceramic-on-ceramic THA in patients younger than 50 years after two to 14 years. Semin Arthroplasty. 2011;22:248–253. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chevillotte C, Trousdale RT, An KN, Padgett D, Wright T. Retrieval analysis of squeaking ceramic implants: are there related specific features? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012;98:281–287. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.D'Antonio JA, Capello WN, Naughton M. Ceramic bearings for total hip arthroplasty have high survivorship at 10 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:373–381. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2076-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Owen D, Russell N, Chia A, Thomas M. The natural history of ceramic-on-ceramic prosthetic hip squeak and its impact on patients. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014;24:57–61. doi: 10.1007/s00590-012-1142-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kiyama T, Kinsey TL, Mahoney OM. Can squeaking with ceramic-on-ceramic hip articulations in total hip arthroplasty be avoided? J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:1015–1020. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.McDonnell SM, Boyce G, Bar´ J, Young D, Shimmin AJ. The incidence of noise generation arising from the large-diameter Delta Motion ceramic total hip bearing. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B:160–165. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.30450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Morlock M, Nassutt R, Janssen R, Willmann G, Honl M. Mismatched wear couple zirconium oxide and aluminum oxide in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:1071–1074. doi: 10.1054/arth.2001.27233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Glaser D, Komistek RD, Cates HE, Mahfouz MR. Clicking and squeaking: in vivo correlation of sound and separation for different bearing surfaces. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 4):112–120. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Taylor S, Manley MT, Sutton K. The role of stripe wear in causing acoustic emissions from alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(7 Suppl 3):47–51. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yang CC, Kim RH, Dennis DA. The squeaking hip: a cause for concern-disagrees. Orthopedics. 2007;30:739–742. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20070901-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chevillotte C, Trousdale RT, Chen Q, Guyen O, An KN. The 2009 Frank Stinchfield Award: "Hip squeaking": a biomechanical study of ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:345–350. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0911-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Stanat SJ, Capozzi JD. Squeaking in third- and fourth-generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: meta-analysis and systematic review. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:445–453. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Restrepo C, Post ZD, Kai B, Hozack WJ. The effect of stem design on the prevalence of squeaking following ceramic-on-ceramic bearing total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:550–557. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Hip & Pelvis are provided here courtesy of Korean Hip Society

RESOURCES