Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2015 Nov 12;3(6):e01345-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01345-15

Draft Genome Sequence of a Metronidazole-Resistant Derivative of Gardnerella vaginalis Strain ATCC 14019

Jessica A Schuyler 1, Eli Mordechai 1, Martin E Adelson 1, Scott E Gygax 1, David W Hilbert 1,
PMCID: PMC4972788  PMID: 26564054

Abstract

We report the genome sequence of a metronidazole-resistant derivative of Gardnerella vaginalis ATCC 14019. This strain was obtained after serial selection to increase the MIC from 4 to ≥500 µg/ml. Two coding changes, in genes encoding a response regulator and an NAD+ synthetase, arose during selection.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) affects 29% of women in the United States, making it the most common gynecological infection (1). Although the etiology of BV is polymicrobial (2), Gardnerella vaginalis is thought to play a critical role in disease pathogenesis (3). Metronidazole is a recommended front-line therapy for BV (4), and treatment failure is common, affecting roughly 1 in 5 women within 1 month (5). G. vaginalis often persists after the completion of metronidazole therapy (6, 7) and resistance has been reported among clinical isolates (810). Although further research is necessary to conclusively test the link between metronidazole resistance of G. vaginalis and its role in BV treatment failure, it is a plausible hypothesis to explain the poor efficacy of metronidazole in achieving cure.

We serially cultured ATCC 14019 on tryptic soy agar with 5% sheep blood (Northeast Laboratories) containing 1, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, and 256 µg/ml of metronidazole. Cultures were grown for 48 h at 37°C under anaerobic conditions using the GasPak EZ Pouch system (Becton, Dickinson). Metronidazole MIC values were determined by agar dilution using the same conditions. Genomic DNA was isolated using a Gentra PureGene kit (Qiagen). Genomic DNA was sequenced using the 454-GS Junior system (Roche) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Genome assembly was performed using the GS de novo assembler version 3.0. Annotation was performed using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/annotation_prok). Comparative genomic analysis was performed with GS Reference Mapper version 3.0.

We sequenced the genome of ATCC 14019_metR and obtained 122,352 reads totaling 55,721,927 nucleotides. These sequences were assembled into a draft genome consisting of six contigs encompassing 1,660,395 nucleotides, achieving 33-fold coverage. Comparison of this genome to that deposited for ATCC 14019 (NC_014644) revealed 60 high-confidence differences: 5 insertions, 8 deletions, and 47 substitutions. Thirty-nine differences were located in the coding regions of the genome, and we attempted to confirm them by Sanger sequencing. Ten changes were found to be present in our starting stock of ATCC 14019 and likely arose during independent growth from the original clone used for sequencing. Another 27 were not present in ATCC 14019-metR and can be attributed to sequencing errors. The remaining two verified changes were a transversion of guanine to thymine at position 1,662,101, resulting in a missense mutation of lysine (codon AAG) to asparagine (codon AAT) at amino acid position 145 in a hypothetical 280 amino acid protein encoding a response regulator (ADP39446.1) and a transition from guanine to alanine at nucleotide position 786,069, resulting in a change of aspartic acid (codon GAA) to lysine (codon AAA) at amino acid position 376 of NadE, an NH-dependent (3) NAD+ synthetase (ADP38714.1). Further study of these genomic changes may provide insight into the molecular mechanism of metronidazole resistance in this species.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited in GenBank under the accession number LIYA00000000.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

All research support was provided by the Genesis Biotechnology Group.

Footnotes

Citation Schuyler JA, Mordechai E, Adelson ME, Gygax SE, Hilbert DW. 2015. Draft genome sequence of a metronidazole-resistant derivative of Gardnerella vaginalis strain ATCC 14019. Genome Announc 3(6):e01345-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01345-15.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Koumans EH, Sternberg M, Bruce C, McQuillan G, Kendrick J, Sutton M, Markowitz LE. 2007. The prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in the United States, 2001–2004; associations with symptoms, sexual behaviors, and reproductive health. Sex Transm Dis 34:864–869. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318074e565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fredricks DN, Fiedler TL, Marrazzo JM. 2005. Molecular identification of bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis. N Engl J Med 353:1899–1911. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schwebke JR, Muzny CA, Josey WE. 2014. Role of Gardnerella vaginalis in the pathogenesis of bacterial vaginosis: a conceptual model. J Infect Dis 210:338–343. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Workowski KA, Berman S, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . 2010. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep 59:1–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Koumans EH, Markowitz LE, Hogan V, CDC BV Working Group . 2002. Indications for therapy and treatment recommendations for bacterial vaginosis in nonpregnant and pregnant women: a synthesis of data. Clin Infect Dis 35:S152–S172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fredricks DN, Fiedler TL, Thomas KK, Mitchell CM, Marrazzo JM. 2009. Changes in vaginal bacterial concentrations with intravaginal metronidazole therapy for bacterial vaginosis as assessed by quantitative PCR. J Clin Microbiol 47:721–726. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01384-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mitchell CM, Hitti JE, Agnew KJ, Fredricks DN. 2009. Comparison of oral and vaginal metronidazole for treatment of bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy: impact on fastidious bacteria. BMC Infect Dis 9:89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Simoes JA, Aroutcheva A, Heimler I, Shott S, Faro S. 2001. Bacteriocin susceptibility of Gardnerella vaginalis and its relationship to biotype, genotype, and metronidazole susceptibility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1186–1190. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.118144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kharsany AB, Hoosen AA, Van den Ende J. 1993. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Gardnerella vaginalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 37:2733–2735. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.12.2733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Goldstein EJC, Citron DM, Merriam CV, Warren YA, Tyrrell KL, Fernandez HT. 2002. In vitro activities of garenoxacin (BMS 284756) against 108 clinical isolates of Gardnerella vaginalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:3995–3996. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.12.3995-3996.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES