Skip to main content
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
. 2016 Aug 4;7:1179. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01179

A Different Pattern of Production and Scavenging of Reactive Oxygen Species in Halophytic Eutrema salsugineum (Thellungiella salsuginea) Plants in Comparison to Arabidopsis thaliana and Its Relation to Salt Stress Signaling

Maria Pilarska 1, Monika Wiciarz 2, Ivan Jajić 2, Małgorzata Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno 3, Petre Dobrev 4, Radomíra Vanková 4, Ewa Niewiadomska 1,*
PMCID: PMC4972836  PMID: 27540390

Abstract

Isolated thylakoids from halophytic Eutrema salsugineum (Thellungiella salsuginea) produces more H2O2 in comparison to glycophytic Arabidopsis thaliana. The first objective of this study was to verify whether this feature is relevant also to the intact chloroplasts and leaves. Enhanced H2O2 levels in chloroplasts and leaves of E. salsugineum were positively verified with several methods (electron microscopy, staining with Amplex Red and with diaminobenzidine). This effect was associated with a decreased ratio of O2•–/H2O2 in E. salsugineum in comparison to A. thaliana as detected by electron paramagnetic resonance method. As a next step, we tested how this specific ROS signature of halophytic species affects the antioxidant status and down-stream components of ROS signaling. Comparison of enzymatic antioxidants revealed a decreased activity of ascorbate peroxidase (APX), enhanced activity of glutathione peroxidase, and the presence of thylakoid-bound forms of iron superoxide dismutase (FeSOD) and APX in E. salsugineum. These cues were, however, independent from application of salt stress. The typical H2O2-dependent cellular responses, namely the levels of glucosinolates and stress-related hormones were determined. The total glucosinolate content in E. salsugineum water-treated leaves was higher than in A. thaliana and increased after salinity treatment. Treatment with salinity up-regulated all of tested stress hormones, their precursors and catabolites [abscisic acid (ABA), dihydrophaseic acid, phaseic acid, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, cis-(+)-12-oxo-phytodienoic acid and jasmonoyl-L-isoleucine] in A. thaliana, whereas in E. salsugineum only a stimulation in ethylene synthesis and ABA catabolism was noted. Obtained results suggest that constitutively enhanced H2O2 generation in chloroplasts of E. salsugineum might be a crucial component of stress-prepardeness of this halophytic species. It shapes a very efficient antioxidant protection (in which glucosinolates might play a specific role) and a fine tuning of hormonal signaling to suppress the cell death program directed by jasmonate pathway.

Keywords: chloroplast, glucosinolates, halophyte, hydrogen peroxide, salinity, stress hormones

Introduction

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are intriguing molecules, which are toxic to the biological structures but also play a signaling role in controlling plant growth, development and stress responses (for a recent review, see Suzuki et al., 2012; Baxter et al., 2014). They accompany the basal metabolic fluxes of aerobic organisms during the whole ontogeny. Considering the precise and multilevel control of metabolic changes it might not be surprising that ROS coming from the various cellular and extracellular sites seem to have their specific signaling targets (op den Camp et al., 2003; Avsian-Kretchmer et al., 2004; Gadjev et al., 2006; Geisler et al., 2006; Laloi et al., 2007). In plants several ROS, such as H2O2, O2•– and 1O2, are formed in chloroplasts aside the photosynthetic electron transport. They, in turn, affect the nuclear gene expression to adjust the photosynthesis to changing environment. The most stable form, which is assumed to leave this organelle and evoke the effects on the nuclear genes, is H2O2 (Mubarakshina et al., 2010; Borisova et al., 2012).

In an attempt to recognize the signaling effects of H2O2 originating from chloroplasts, Arabidopsis mutant overexpressing glycolate oxidase in chloroplasts (GO5 plants) has been developed (Fahnenstich et al., 2008). In the photorespiratory conditions GO5 mutants produce H2O2 in chloroplasts instead of in peroxisomes. Transcript profiling of GO5 plants (Balazadeh et al., 2012) identified the H2O2 regulated genes and transcription factors, whereas further work of Sewelam et al. (2014) underpinned the top 20 genes specifically up-regulated by H2O2 produced in chloroplasts. These studies proved that H2O2 can trigger different responses depending on the subcellular site of its production.

Recently, we demonstrated that thylakoids isolated from a highly stress resistant species Eutrema salsugineum (Thellungiella salsuginea) are capable of the enhanced production of H2O2, in comparison to Arabidopsis thaliana, already in the absence of stress (Wiciarz et al., 2015). This creates the opportunity to unravel the signaling action of chloroplast H2O2 generation in the natural system. E. salsugineum tolerates extreme salinity, cold, drought, ozone and over the last years this species became a plant model of stress resistance well-comparable with the Arabidopsis genome (Inan et al., 2004; Li et al., 2006; Amtmann, 2009; Hou and Bartels, 2015). So far, several studies focused on the discovery of transcriptomic footprints of high stress resistance in E. salsugineum. These studies showed that several stress-associated genes in E. salsugineum have a constitutively higher expression in comparison with A. thaliana already in the absence of stress (Inan et al., 2004; Taji et al., 2004; Gong et al., 2005). The group of up-regulated genes includes, for example, those involved in abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthesis and signaling (Taji et al., 2004; Gong et al., 2005). In contrast, after stress treatment, only a slight change in gene expression was detected in E. salsugineum in comparison with a great activation of transcription in A. thaliana plants (Taji et al., 2004; Li et al., 2006; Wong et al., 2006). Also, a comparative proteomics of A. thaliana and E. salsugineum salt responses revealed more changes in protein abundance in Arabidopsis than in Eutrema (Pang et al., 2010). Combined, these results indicate so called ‘stress preparedness’ of E. salsugineum, which supports its halophytic nature. Comparison of metabolite profiles of these two species following salt stress revealed a significant differences (Arbona et al., 2010). This suggests, that an adjustment of metabolism and activation of the already present enzymatic machinery serves as a faster and more efficient strategy to cope with stress than synthesis of new proteins.

A goal of this study was to verify whether enhanced generation of H2O2 in thylakoids of halophytic Eutrema in comparison to glycophytic A. thaliana is significant also in vivo. As a next objective, it was tested how this situation influences oxidative damage, antioxidant system and hormonal signaling in the control conditions and after a salinity stress.

Materials and Methods

Plant Material and Growth Conditions

Arabidopsis thaliana (Col-0) and E. salsugineum (T. salsuginea, salt cress) ecotype Shandong were grown from seeds in the soil culture under irrigation with tap water. Seeds were obtained from the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre, UK. Plants were cultivated in the phytotron chamber at temperatures of 18°/16°C day/night, photoperiod 10/14 h, irradiance of ab. 220 μmol m-2 s-1 and RH ∼50%. Both species were adapted to these conditions for at least three generations. Because of delay in growth of E. salsugineum in comparison to A. thaliana, as reported earlier (Inan et al., 2004; Stepien and Johnson, 2009), to compare rosettes at the same developmental stage, 4-weeks-old A. thaliana and 5-weeks-old E. salsugineum plants were taken for experiments. To evoke a mild salinity-stress plants were irrigated with 0.15 and 0.3 M NaCl solutions for A. thaliana and E. salsugineum, respectively, while watered plants served as controls. After 7 days of NaCl treatment complete rosettes were collected, frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until further use (unless stated otherwise).

Thylakoid Membrane Preparation

Thylakoids were isolated as described earlier (Wiciarz et al., 2015). Shortly, leaves were homogenized in medium containing 50 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.6), 330 mM sorbitol (control plants) and 495 mM sorbitol (NaCl-treated plants) respectively, 1 mM MgCl2, 2 mM Na2EDTA, 5 mM sodium ascorbate and 0.01% (w/v) fatty acid-free bovine serum albumine. After centrifugation for 4 min at 4000 × g the pellet was resuspended in 50 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.6), 5 mM sorbitol, 5 mM MgCl2 and centrifuged again. Then the pellet was washed and resuspended in 50 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.6), 330 mM sorbitol, 10 mM MgCl2, 20 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM Na2EDTA, 10 mM NaHCO3. The chlorophyll concentration was estimated spectrophotometrically according to Lichtenthaler and Buschmann (2001).

Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) Measurements

Production of O2•– and H2O2 by thylakoids from A. thaliana and E. salsugineum water-treated plants was detected by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spin-trapping spectroscopy using DMPO (5,5-dimethyl-pyrroline N-oxide; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and POBN [α-(4-pyridyl-1-oxide)-N-tertbutylnitrone; Sigma-Aldrich] as the spin trap, respectively, as described earlier (Jajić et al., 2015). Shortly, for O2•– detection, isolated thylakoids (chlorophyll concentration 200 μg mL-1) were mixed with DMPO to a final concentration 50 mM, transferred to a flat cell and illuminated for 5 min at 500 μmol quanta m-2 s-1 within the EPR spectrometer MiniScope MS300 (Magnettech GmbH, Germany). For H2O2 detection, the H2O2-derived hydroxyl radical after the initiation of the Fenton reaction was measured. Isolated thylakoids (concentration of chlorophyll 150 μg mL-1) in a reaction medium pH 7.6 containing 0.4 M sucrose, 20 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Hepes-KOH were illuminated with white light source LS2 (Hansatech, UK) for 3 min at 500 μmol quanta m-2 s-1. Next, 50 mM POBN, 50 μM FeEDTA and 4% ethanol were added and incubated for 3 min, transferred to glass capillaries and measured using an EPR spectrometer. To check the influence of enzymatic scavengers on H2O2 production, measurements were performed in presence and absence of 5 mM sodium azide (inhibitor of heme containing enzymes).

H2O2 Detection

Ultrastructural localization of H2O2 was visualized in transmission electron microscopy (TEM) via electron-dense precipitates of cerium perhydroxides [Ce(OH)2OOH and Ce(OH)3OOH] formed after the reaction of cerium chloride (CeCl3) with endogenous H2O2 (Bestwick et al., 1997). After 1 h of light leaves of A. thaliana and E. salsugineum from water-treated plants were cut into small pieces (∼5 mm). Leaf fragments were immediately infiltrated and then incubated for 1 h with a 0.5 M morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) buffer (pH 7.0), containing 5 mM CeCl3 (Libik-Konieczny et al., 2015). The controls were tissue samples incubated in MOPS buffer. Then, tissues were quickly washed in the 0.5 M MOPS and fixed in 2.5% (w/v) formaldehyde (prepared from paraformaldehyde) and a 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in 50 mM cacodylate buffer (pH 7.0) for 4 h at room temperature. The procedure for preparing the samples for TEM was as described earlier (Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno and Płachno, 2012). The material was dehydrated in a series of graded acetone and embedded in Spurr Low-Viscosity Embedding Kit (Polysciences, Germany). Ultrathin (60–90 nm) sections were cut with a diamond knife on a Leica EM UC7 ultramicrotome. The sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and then viewed using a Philips CM 100 TEM at 75 kV.

Histochemical localization of H2O2 production in leaves was determined using the DAB (3,3-diaminobenzidine) staining technique according to Libik-Konieczny et al. (2015). Leaves of E. salsugineum and A. thaliana water-treated plants were infiltrated with a solution of 1 mg mL-1 DAB (Sigma-Aldrich) prepared in water. Incubation was carried for 4 h in the dark at room temperature.

SDS-PAGE and Immunoblot Analysis

Leaf soluble proteins were extracted with 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 7.5 containing 1 mM dithiothreitol, 2% (w/v) polyvinylpolypyrrolidone and protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich). Homogenates were centrifuged 10 min at 10000 × g. Protein concentration in supernatant was estimated using Roti®-Nanoquant Protein quantitation assay (Carl Roth, Germany). SDS-PAGE as well as immunoblotting were performed as described earlier (Niewiadomska et al., 2009). Thylakoid membranes (TMs) and soluble proteins were dissolved in denaturating buffer and heated 20 min at 99°C (soluble proteins) or 5 min at 75°C (TMs). After electrophoresis, the separated proteins were blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes and probed with polyclonal antibodies raised against: ascorbate peroxidase (APX; anti-APX); glutathione peroxidase (GPX; anti-GPX); iron superoxide dismutase (FeSOD; anti-FeSOD); gamma glutamylcysteine synthase, γ -ECS (anti-γ -ECS); peroxiredoxins Q, PrxQ (anti-PrxQ). All antibodies were purchased from Agrisera (Sweden).

Determination of Lipid Peroxidation

Lipid peroxidation in leaves and isolated thylakoids of A. thaliana and E. salsugineum water-treated plants was assessed by measuring the malondialdehyde (MDA) content using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) as described by Rastogi et al. (2014). Shortly, leaf samples were ground in a mortar with chilled 80% (v/v) ethanol. The extract was then centrifuged (10000 × g for 2 min) and the supernatant was further used. Samples were mixed with equal amount of reaction mixture containing 20% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid, 0.01% (w/v) butylated hydroxytoluene and 0.65% (v/v) thiobarbituric acid (TBA). After heating at 95°C for 20 min and centrifugation the MDA-(TBA)2 adduct was separated and quantified by the HPLC. The elution buffer was 50 mM KH2PO4 (pH 7.0)/methanol (65:35, v/v). The retention time was 5 min and flow rate of 0.5 mL min-1 with detection at 530 nm. Tetraethoxy-propane (Sigma-Aldrich) was used as a standard.

Quantification of H2O2 Concentration

An Amplex® Red Hydrogen Peroxide/Peroxidase Assay Kit (Life Technologies/Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) was used to measure H2O2 content in A. thaliana and E. salsugineum leaves after water irrigation. Leaves (0.1 g) frozen in liquid nitrogen were ground with 0.5 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, and centrifuged 10 min at 10,000 × g. Proteins were removed from the extracts using Amicon Ultra Centrifugal Filters (Merck Millipore, USA) and the filtrate (25 μL) was incubated for 30 min in dark conditions with 50 mM Amplex Red reagent and 0.2 units mL-1 horseradish peroxidase. Excitation was measured at 530 nm and fluorescence detection at 590 nm with a microplate reader Synergy 2 (BioTek, USA). The hydrogen peroxide concentration was estimated by comparison with standard curve (0–10 μM) of H2O2. The experiments were repeated three times independently, each time in triplicate.

Determination of Antioxidant Enzyme Activities

Soluble leaf proteins were extracted with 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 7.5 [catalase (CAT); SOD], 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.0 (GPX) or 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 7.8 with 1 mM ascorbic acid (APX), in each case containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich). After centrifugation 10 min at 10000 × g at 4°C soluble proteins were desalted using Amicon Ultra Centrifugal Filters (Merck Millipore). Protein concentration was estimated using Roti® -Nanoquant Protein quantitation assay (Carl Roth).

Catalase activity was measured according to the method described by Aebi (1984). The decomposition of 10 mM H2O2 in phosphate buffer (50 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.0) was monitored for 2 min at 240 nm. Calculations used an absorbance coefficient of 43 M-1 cm-1.

Ascorbate peroxidase activity was determined according to Nakano and Asada (1981). The decrease in absorbance at 290 nm due to ascorbate oxidation was recorded. The assay mixture contained 20 μg proteins, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM ascorbic acid, 50 mM and 0.1 mM H2O2 in phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). The absorbance was recorded after 3 min. The APX activity was calculated using the absorbance coefficient of 2.8 mM-1 cm-1.

Glutathione peroxidase activity was determined as the decrease in absorbance at 340 nm due to the oxidation of NADPH (𝜀 = 6.22 mM-1 cm-1) according to Hopkins and Tudhope (1973). The reaction mixture consisted of 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 8.0) containing 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.125 mM NADPH, 1 mM reduced glutathione, 0.5 U/mL glutathione reductase (Sigma-Aldrich), 300 μM tert-butyl hydroperoxide and 20 μg proteins. The reaction was monitored for 3 min.

Glucosinolate Content

The total glucosinolates were extracted and assessed basically as described by Aghajanzadeh et al. (2014). Leaf samples (0.1 g) were boiled for 2 min in 3 ml 90% methanol. The extract was centrifuged (2500 × g for 2 min) and the residues were extracted again. The determination of total glucosinolate content was based on color complex formation between glucosinolates and sodium tetrachloropallade (II). The 60 μl of extract was incubated for 30 min in 1800 μl 2 mM Na2PdCl4 and absorbance of developed color was measured at 450 nm. The glucosinolate content was calculated using standard curve of sinigrin (0–3 mM; Sigma-Aldrich).

Plant Hormone Determination

For hormone analysis A. thaliana and E. salsugineum leaf samples were collected at midday. Extraction and analysis were performed according to Dobrev and Kamínek (2002) and Dobrev and Vankova (2012). Briefly, approximately 100 mg fresh samples were homogenized and extracted with methanol/water/formic acid (15/4/1, v/v/v). The following labeled internal standards (10 pmol per sample) were added: 2H6-ABA, 2H3-PA, 2H4-SA, 2H5-JA (Olchemim, Czech Republic). Extracts were purified using SPE-C18 column (SepPak-C18, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) and separated on a reverse phase-cation exchange column (Oasis-MCX, Waters). The hormone fraction was eluted with methanol, separated by HPLC (Ultimate 3000, Dionex/Thermo Fisher Scientific, Austria) and the hormones were quantified using a hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion trap mass spectrometer (3200 Q TRAP, Applied Biosystems/MDS SCIEX, Foster City, CA, USA). The analyses were carried out in three biological replicates. The analysis of ABA and its catabolites DPA (dihydrophaseic acid) and PA (phaseic acid); ACC (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid), SA (salicylic acid), jasmonic acid (JA) and jasmonate precursor cis-OPDA [cis-(+)-12-oxo-phytodienoic acid] and jasmonoyl-L-isoleucine (JA-Ile) was performed.

Statistical Analysis

All analysis were calculated with Student’s t-test. Significant differences are marked at P ≤ 0.05.

Results

Production of H2O2 in Isolated Thylakoids and in Leaves

In thylakoids from A. thaliana and E. salsugineum an opposite patterns of ROS production were demonstrated by EPR method (Figure 1). Illuminated thylakoids of E. salsugineum generated more H2O2, as detected indirectly with POBN spin trap which reacts with H2O2-derived hydroxyl radical (Figures 1A,B), but less O2•–, as detected with DMPO spin trap (Figures 1C,D), in comparison to the thylakoids of A. thaliana. Addition of NaN3 strongly increased the production of H2O2, but did not significantly influence generation of O2•– the superoxide anion radical.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spin-trapping spectroscopy measurements of H2O2(A,B) and O2•–(C,D) production by illuminated thylakoids isolated from water-treated Arabidopsis thaliana and Eutrema salsugineum. (A) The intensity of EPR signal of H2O2-derived hydroxyl radicals; (B) representative EPR spectra of the POBN adduct; (C) The intensity of superoxide anion radical measured with DMPO-OOH spin-trap; (D) representative EPR spectra of the DMPO adduct. The analyses were performed in the presence and absence of sodium azide (NaN3). ‘Asterisk’ indicates significant difference from A. thaliana. Each data point represents the mean ± SD (n = 3). Significant differences between the averaged H2O2 production with and without NaN3 in both species are not marked on the graph.

To verify unequivocally, whether a difference in H2O2 generation between the two species is significant also for chloroplasts and leaves we used several methodological approaches. The presence of H2O2 in the chloroplasts has been tested with a specific CeCl3 staining visualized by TEM. Chloroplasts of mesophyll cells from water-treated A. thaliana revealed no cerium perhydroxide deposits (Figure 2A), while salt stress associated H2O2 accumulation was visible as black precipitate spots (Figure 2B), mainly at the edges of granal thylakoids (Figure 2C). In contrast, in chloroplasts of E. salsugineum an electron-dense precipitates were detectable already in control (Figure 2D), while more pronounced dark spots were visible after salt stress (Figures 2E,F). Another difference between A. thaliana and E. salsugineum detected by TEM was that a salinity-induced thylakoid swelling was detected only in A. thaliana chloroplasts (Figure 2B), while in E. salsugineum chloroplasts no signs of such destruction occurred (Figures 2E,F). Staining controls without CeCl3 showed no electron-dense deposits in both species (data not shown).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of H2O2 accumulation in chloroplasts of A. thaliana and E. salsugineum plants treated with water and NaCl solution (0.15 and 0.3 M, respectively). The black spots (white arrows) represent H2O2 forming electron-dense cerium perhydroxide precipitates. A. thaliana chloroplasts from water-treated (A) and salt-stressed plants (B,C). Black arrow in (B) points to the swelling of thylakoids. E. salsugineum chloroplasts from water-treated (D) and salt-stressed plants (E,F). t, thylakoids; s, stroma. Bars = 1 μm (A,B,D,E); Bars = 0.5 μm (C,F).

Similarly, in leaves, enhanced content of H2O2 was documented in E. salsugineum than in A. thaliana (Figure 3A- staining with Amplex Red, and Figure 3B- staining with DAB). However, in spite of the high availability of this ROS a very low level of MDA was detected in E. salsugineum leaves, indicating a low extent of oxidative damage to membrane lipids (Figure 4A). This difference between the two species disappeared when isolated TMs were compared (Figure 4B). On this basis we formulated a hypothesis that enhanced leakage of H2O2 from plastids keeps the antioxidant system up-regulated, thereby preadapting plants to the salinity stress.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) accumulation in leaves from water-treated A. thaliana and E. salsugineum plants. (A) Content of H2O2 in deproteinated leaf extracts determined using the Amplex Red assay. Results were normalized to the average H2O2 content in A. thaliana. Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 3). ‘Asterisk’ indicates significant difference. (B) Visualization of H2O2 accumulation assessed by DAB staining of representative leaves.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Content of malondialdehyde (MDA) in leaves of water-treated A. thaliana and E. salsugineum plants (A) and isolated thylakoid membranes (TMs; B) assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Each data point represents the mean ± SD (n = 3). ‘Asterisk’ indicates significant difference from A. thaliana.

Comparison of Antioxidant System in Arabidopsis and Eutrema

The capacity of antioxidant system was compared in leaves of A. thaliana and E. salsugineum in the control conditions and after salinity stress. Due to the disturbed kinetics of enzymatic assays observed in crude leaf extracts (LEs) from E. salsugineum, the activities of H2O2 scavenging enzymes were analyzed in purified protein fractions. The activities of CAT were similar in both species in the control conditions and remained unchanged after salinity stress (Figure 5A). The activity of APX was lower in the E. salsugineum both in control and after salinity stress (Figure 5B). In contrast, the activity of thiol-dependent GPX was higher in E. salsugineum both in control and after a salinity stress (Figure 5C).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Activities of CAT (A), APX (B), GPX (C) enzymes in the whole leaf cells of A. thaliana and E. salsugineum plants treated with water and NaCl solution (0.15 and 0.3 M, respectively). Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3). ‘Asterisk’ indicates significant difference from A. thaliana from the same treatment.

Considering the chloroplastic generation of H2O2 in E. salsugineum, the antioxidant system in this organelle might be of particular importance for this species. Therefore, we compared the antioxidant enzymes present at TMs and in the soluble fraction (LEs; Figure 6). The stromal form of APX (sAPX) was present in similar amount in both species, while distribution of thylakoid bound APX (tAPX) showed a clear difference between A. thaliana and E. salsugineum. This form was much more abundant in Eutrema both in controls and in salinity-treated plants, while it was barely detected in A. thaliana. Another differences between these two species was related to FeSOD. In E. salsugineum, FeSOD was less abundant in LEs, while it was much more abundant in TMs, when compared with A. thaliana (Figure 6). To get an insight into the level of thiols and thiol-dependent enzymes we compared the amount of stromal peroxiredoxins Q (PrxQ) and the enzyme of reduced glutathione (GSH) synthesis, gamma glutamylcysteine synthase (γ-ECS). In E. salsugineum PrxQ were more abundant than in A. thaliana, and a slight decrease was noted after salinity treatment in both species, whilst γ-ECS was present at similar amount in both species (Figure 6). These pronounced differences between E. salsugineum and A. thaliana in the amounts of various ROS scavengers in chloroplasts suggest that there is a stronger need to protect photosynthetic membranes against ROS in the former species, already in the absence of stress.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Changes in the amount of APX (ascorbate peroxidase), FeSOD (iron superoxide dismutase), PrxQ (peroxiredoxin Q) and γ-ECS (gamma glutamylcysteine synthase) in A. thaliana and E. salsugineum plants treated with water and NaCl solution (0.15 and 0.3 M, respectively). Immunoblotting was performed with leaf extracts (LEs) and with thylakoid membranes (TMs). For visualization of APX, FeSOD and PrxQ in LE 40, 30, and 5 μg protein per lane was loaded, respectively. For visualization of APX, FeSOD and γ-ECS in TM 10 μg chlorophyll per lane was loaded. Blots are representative for three repetitions. sAPX, stromal APX; pAPX, peroxisomal APX; tAPX, thylakoid bound APX.

Signaling Pathways Associated with ROS

It is well-documented that ROS signaling is interconnected with stress hormones (Baxter et al., 2014). Therefore, we analyzed the endogenous levels of stress-related hormones in A. thaliana and E. salsugineum plants grown in control conditions and changes evoked by salt-treatment. In control conditions, the concentrations of ABA and its catabolite PA were similar in leaves of both species (Figures 7A,B), while the level of another ABA catabolite, DPA was twofold lower in E. salsugineum (Figure 7C). Salt treatment caused an increase in ABA (twofold), DPA (twofold) and PA (threefold) in A. thaliana, whereas no significant changes (ABA, DPA), and a slight increase in (PA), were detected in E. salsugineum (Figures 7A–C). Concentrations of ethylene precursor ACC were similar in the two species in control conditions and underwent a similar increase due to salinity (Figure 7D). Concentrations of SA and jasmonates were much lower in the control E. salsugineum in comparison to A. thaliana: SA almost fourfold, JA by 4.5-fold, Ja-Ile by 2.4-fold and cisOPDA by 5.5-fold (Figures 7E–H). NaCl-treatment increased the levels of these hormones in A. thaliana (1.7-, 2.6-, 6.6-, 1.8-fold, respectively) but not in E. salsugineum, where their decreased concentrations were found (1.8-, 4-, 4-, 3.2-fold, respectively).

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Average content of stress-related hormones in leaves of A. thaliana and E. salsugineum plants treated with water and NaCl solution (0.15 and 0.3 M, respectively) assesed by LC–MS/MS. (A) ABA (abscisic acid). (B) DPA (dihydrophaseic acid). (C) PA (phaseic acid). (D) ACC (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid). (E) SA (salicylic acid). (F) JA (jasmonic acid). (G) JA-Ile (jasmonoyl-L-isoleucine). (H) cisOPDA (cis-12-oxo-phytodienioc acid). Each data point represents the mean ± SD (n = 5). ‘Asterisk’ indicates significant difference from A. thaliana from the same treatment. ‘Diamond’ indicates a significant difference between control and salinity-treated plants.

One of the highlights of H2O2 signaling from chloroplasts seems to be enhanced synthesis of glucosinolates, as demonstrated in GO5 plants (Balazadeh et al., 2012; Sewelam et al., 2014). To check this cue in our wild type model, we measured the total concentration of leaf glucosinolates. The total level of glucosinolates was enhanced in leaves of E. salsugineum in comparison with A. thaliana in control conditions, and a stronger increase was detected in E. salsugineum after salinity treatment (Figure 8).

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

Total glucosinolates content in leaves of A. thaliana and E. salsugineum plants treated with water and NaCl solution (0.15 and 0.3 M, respectively). Each data point represents the mean ± SD (n = 3). ‘Asterisk’ indicates significant difference from A. thaliana from the same treatment. ‘Diamond’ indicates significant difference between control and salinity-treated plants.

Discussion

In this work, we compared a halophytic E. salsugineum with glycophytic A. thaliana in regard to the chloroplastic H2O2 signature on the salt stress tolerance. As a first step, we verified whether a chloroplastic H2O2 signal, previously reported with use of isolated TMs (Wiciarz et al., 2015), persists in the relatively undamaged organelle and tissue.

Enhanced generation of H2O2 within the chloroplasts of control and stress-treated Eutrema was visualized by TEM, suggesting that a higher level of H2O2 persists in the whole chloroplasts. However, it is not uniformly distributed but spotted in the proximity of granal thylakoids, were it is produced. TEM images also revealed, that NaCl treatment caused thylakoid swelling only in A. thaliana. Thylakoid dilation is a well-documented symptom of salinity stress in plants (Niewiadomska et al., 2011; Yamane et al., 2012; Pottosin and Shabala, 2016), while structural integrity of E. salsugineum chloroplasts under mild NaCl-stress was previously shown by Chang et al. (2015). This lack of swelling might be attributed to the activity of thylakoid ion channels, and/or K+(Na+)/H+ antiporters which control the ion homeostasis under salinity-stress (Pottosin and Shabala, 2016).

Although we did not find any direct evidence for an export of H2O2 from plastids, the total H2O2 level in leaf extracts was also elevated in Eutrema leaves. Hence, it is likely that a chloroplast H2O2 generation contributes considerably to this phenomenon. Our speculation is based on a well-accepted phenomenon that illuminated chloroplast is a major site of ROS production in the mesophyll cells (Asada, 2006). Moreover, a considerable leakage of H2O2 from healthy chloroplasts has been shown experimentally (Mubarakshina et al., 2010; Borisova et al., 2012).

Here, performed study revealed that an increased generation of H2O2 in halophytic species is associated by a decreased generation of O2•–. Considering a much higher reactivity of O2•– than H2O2, this pattern of ROS production might shape a specific ROS signature important for so called stress-prepardeness of Eutrema. This speculation is supported by a much lower oxidative damage (MDA) in leaves of E. salsugineum than in A. thaliana. As argued by Tiwari et al. (2013), superoxide, but not H2O2, is required to evoke oxidative damage in photosynthetic membranes. This damage is mediated by the hydroxyl radical and is manifested by the appearance of carbon-centered radical. Experiments with the flu A. thaliana mutant and the flu overexpressing tAPX, enabled to demonstrate that H2O2 antagonizes the 1O2-mediated cell death response and growth inhibition, which might be particularly advantageous under stress (Laloi et al., 2007). A rapid conversion of a more harmful ROS (such as O2•–) into a longer-living and less toxic H2O2 has previously been concluded for halophytic plants on the basis of enhanced activity of superoxide dismutase (Bose et al., 2014). In halophytic E. salsugineum an operation of the protective electron cycling around PSII (Stepien and Johnson, 2009; Wiciarz et al., 2015) seems to support that view. Such a cycle could be beneficial for plants in several ways. Firstly, it may create a more safe electron sink in comparison to the production of superoxide and its toxic derivatives. Secondly, an abundance of H2O2 may play a signaling role.

A growing body of data indicate that H2O2 triggers defense responses in plant cells (for a recent review, see Suzuki et al., 2012; Baxter et al., 2014; Bose et al., 2014; Ismail et al., 2014). In this respect, ROS formation in chloroplast may also act indirectly via strengthening or amplifying retrograde redox signals (Galvez-Valdivieso and Mullineaux, 2010). One of the targets of ROS signaling route under stress is an up-regulation of antioxidants (Fryer et al., 2003; Geisler et al., 2006). However, the activity of a major H2O2 scavenger CAT was similar in E. salsugineum and A. thaliana in controls and in salinity-treated plants, whereas APX activity was even decreased in E. salsugineum. This is in agreement with numerous reports on salt cress. The transcript profiling analysis with two E. salsugineum ecotypes did not detect any antioxidant genes among those specifically up-regulated by salinity (Taji et al., 2004; Wong et al., 2006). Also, a proteomic data did not detect any salinity-dependent stimulation of antioxidant enzymes in this species (Pang et al., 2010). At activity level M’rah et al. (2006) previously noted that stimulation of CAT activity in E. salsugineum occurred only under a mild salinity treatment, not greater than 100 mM, whereas some stimulation was related to total peroxidase activity (assessed with guaiacol as electron donor).

Intriguingly, all these data suggest that a high stress resistance of Eutrema does not rely on the major enzymatic H2O2 scavengers of mesophyll cells. We argue, that data obtained with a partially purified (desalted) protein extracts (as used here) give a more precise information about changes in the enzymatic activities in comparison to the data typically obtained with crude extracts. The latter are strongly influenced by a different availability of low molecular compounds, such as ascorbate in case of APX, and glutathione in case of GPX. Indeed, an increased pool of reduced ascorbate and of total glutathione was found due to salinity in Eutrema, but not in Arabidopsis (Wiciarz et al., 2016). This feature might be important in the context of H2O2 signaling. As suggested by Bose et al. (2014), decreased activities of a major H2O2 scavengers allow for a persistence of ROS signal in the cells. A fine-tuning of specific antioxidants seems to be more important for stress tolerance than a bulk changes in the antioxidant status (Jiang et al., 2007; Pang et al., 2010). We are, however, aware that a relation between ROS production and scavenging is highly dynamic while a situation reported here for Eutrema relates only to certain time point. But, on the other hand, it was verified with use of several methods and plants sets to be considered as physiologically relevant.

Among the enzymatic H2O2 scavengers only GPX was enhanced in E. salsugineum. This points to the importance of redox active thiols. GPXs reduce not only H2O2 but also organic hydroperoxides using reducing power of GSH. Hence, they may contribute to the dramatically reduced MDA level. A noteworthy stimulation of antioxidant defense associated with glutathione has previously been revealed in E. salsugineum by transcript profiling of Gong et al. (2005). This was represented by GPXs (GPX2 and GPX6), glutaredoxins and glutathione-S-transferases (GSTZ1 and GSTU7). Four out of eight GPXs found in E. salsugineum have been shown to respond to salt and osmotic stresses at both transcript and protein level (Gao et al., 2014). It is worthy to note here, that GPX may serve as a specific sensor and transducer of H2O2 signal. A dual function of GPX associated with both scavenging of ROS and transferring the H2O2 signal has been pointed out repeatedly (Delaunay et al., 2002; Miao et al., 2006). Moreover, a specific activation of GPX1 promoter in tobacco by a chloroplast-generated H2O2 was documented by Avsian-Kretchmer et al. (2004). Whereas, study with Arabidopsis gpx3 mutant demonstrated that GPX3 participates in the ABA and H2O2 signaling pathway regulating the stomatal aperture and resistance to drought (Miao et al., 2006).

Considering an enhanced generation of H2O2 and changed O2•–/H2O2 ratio in chloroplasts, a major role might be attributed to the anti-oxidative protection within this organelle. Indeed, TMs of Eutrema appeared to be better protected against ROS in comparison with Arabidopsis, as indicated by a higher abundance of tAPX and FeSOD. This corresponds with enhanced level of FeSOD transcripts in the control E. salsugineum, reported by Taji et al. (2004). In regard to chloroplast stroma, we found an enhanced amount of PrxQ in E. salsugineum. These above-mentioned features of chloroplast antioxidant system are constitutive in E. salsugineum, which supports earlier conclusions on the stress preparedness of this species (Inan et al., 2004; Taji et al., 2004; Gong et al., 2005; Wong et al., 2006). They are also in line with the view that components of redox homeostasis in chloroplasts are crucial for salinity tolerance (Niewiadomska and Wiciarz, 2015; Uzilday et al., 2015). So far, recognized chloroplast redox players highly engaged in E. salsugineum are: adenosine 5′-phosphosulfate reductase involved in sulfate assimilation (Gong et al., 2005); thioredoxin CDSP32 (M’rah et al., 2007); 2-cys peroxiredoxin BAS1 (Gao et al., 2009) and plastid terminal oxidase (PTOX), an enzyme of chlororespiratory pathway (Stepien and Johnson, 2009; Wiciarz et al., 2015). In addition to these, also proteins associated with the Calvin-Benson cycle, such as a more active Rubisco (Wiciarz et al., 2015) and a more abundant glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Pang et al., 2010; Chang et al., 2015) are likely to contribute to the improved redox balance in E. salsugineum by efficient recycling of ADP and NADP+.

A very weak response to salinity stress at the level of tested antioxidants may raise a question: whether E. salsugineum (and A. thaliana) senses the salinity stress at all? This has been clarified by analysis of stress hormones. A massive increase in stress-related hormones (ABA, SA, JA, and ethylene precursor) was detected in salinity-treated A. thaliana. These hormones are responsible for several stress effects in plants, among them stomatal closure and retardation of growth, although, their action is quite complex and may lead either to survival or to cell death. In contrast, in Eutrema the only indicator of salinity-evoked stress was a stimulation of ethylene synthesis. Although, some enhancement in ABA catabolite PA, may suggest a previous ABA induction. Earlier study of Ellouzi et al. (2014) documented that levels of ABA, JA, and ACC were increased in E. salsugineum after 2 days of salt stress, while 400 mM NaCl treatment for more than 5 days caused minimal changes in ABA and JA concentrations (Taji et al., 2004; Arbona et al., 2010). In E. salsugineum the levels of lipid-based active jasmonates (JA and JA-Ile) were low and even decreased due to salinity-treatment. This effect seems to be closely related to salt-resistance of Eutrema. As shown by Ismail et al. (2014), an interplay between ABA and JA is of particular importance for plant’s survival or death under salinity stress. A comparison of the two Vitis species differing in salt-stress tolerance revealed that in the more salt-tolerant Vitis rupestris ABA accumulated early and strongly suppressed the formation of JA-Ile, while in the salt-sensitive V. vinifera the accumulation of ABA was delayed and correlated which allow for accumulation of JA-Ile up to the high levels. A suppression of jasmonates in E. salsugineum might also be explained in accordance with the data obtained with AtGO5 mutant overproducing H2O2 in chloroplasts, in which a stimulated expression of several repressors of JA signaling pathway has occurred (Balazadeh et al., 2012). A very weak response to salinity at the level of ABA in E. salsugineum in contrast to A. thaliana is surprising in view of data on a higher expression of genes for ABA-biosynthesis and signaling (Taji et al., 2004; Gong et al., 2005; Wu et al., 2012) and an increased number of genes involved in ABA synthesis pathway in Eutrema genome (Wu et al., 2012). Possibly, in E. salsugineum the increased level of ABA is confined to the early stage of development or this hormone is very rapidly modulated in response to stress (indicated by slight increase in PA). A weak response of stress hormones to salinity in E. salsugineum supports the earlier conclusion of Hou and Bartels (2015), that comparing with A. thaliana the higher NaCl levels (600 mM) are required in E. salsugineum to trigger some defense reactions, such as increased transcription of two aldehyde dehydrogenase genes.

On the other hand, the importance of glucosinolates for stress-resistance of E. salsugineum is depicted by their enhanced level and a strong salinity-dependent increase. A great variation in the patterns of aliphatic, aromatic, and indole glucosinolate was documented in E. salsugineum, depending on the organ and developmental stage (Pang et al., 2012). However, a precise role of these compounds in stress tolerance is not clarified yet. An up-regulation of the synthesis of indole glucosinolates and phytoalexin camalexin was found as a specific feature of increased H2O2 signaling from chloroplasts in studies with AtGO5 mutant made by Balazadeh et al. (2012) and Sewelam et al. (2014). However, E. salsugineum does not produce camalexin, but wasalexins A and B and methoxybrassenin B (Pedras and Adio, 2008). Intriguingly, as another support for a constitutive stress-preparedness of Eutrema, the three phytoalexins (indolyl-3-acetonitrile, caulilexin C, and arvelexin) are found as phytoanticipins, i.e., they are constitutively produced in this species (Pedras and Adio, 2008).

Conclusion

In this paper we provided evidence for a specific pattern of ROS formation and accumulation in halophytic Eutrema in comparison to glycophytic Arabidopsis. In concert with that, a pronounced changes in the antioxidant system were revealed in E. salsugineum, such as a decreased activity of APX, an increased activity of GPX, an increased level of PrxQ, and the presence of thylakoid-bound forms of FeSOD and APX. All these cues allow for enhanced H2O2 signaling from chloroplasts of E. salsugineum already in the control conditions, at decreased level of oxidative damage in the same time. This signaling led to enhanced level of glucosinolates in Eutrema and decreased levels of stress hormones (SA and jasmonates). Salinity-stress evoked a strong up-regulation of all tested stress hormones in A. thaliana whereas in E. salsugineum only a stimulation in ethylene synthesis and ABA catabolism was noted. On this basis we hypothesize that H2O2 signaling is engaged in the halophytic species to modulate a hormonal responses in such a way to minimize the triggering of jasmonate pathway which leads to cell death.

Author Contributions

MP performed analysis of antioxidants, staining and quantitation of H2O2, determination of glucosinolates, participated in TEM analysis and in preparation of the manuscript. MW measured MDA, participates in the analysis of antioxidants and ROS. IJ measured ROS with EPR. MK-K performed TEM analysis. PD and RV measured stress hormones, and RV participated in writing of the text. EN designed the experiment and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Funding. This work was supported by the Polish National Science Centre project (2011/03/B/NZ9/01619 EN, MP, MW).

References

  1. Aebi H. (1984). Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 105 121–126. 10.1016/S0076-6879(84)05016-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aghajanzadeh T., Hawkesford M. J., De Kok L. J. (2014). The significance of glucosinolates for sulfur storage in Brassicaceae seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 5:704 10.3389/fpls.2014.00704 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Amtmann A. (2009). Learning from evolution: Thellungiella generates new knowledge on essential and critical components of abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Mol. Plant 2 3–12. 10.1093/mp/ssn094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arbona V., Argamasilla R., Gómez-Cadenas A. (2010). Common and divergent physiological, hormonal and metabolic responses of Arabidopsis thaliana and Thellungiella halophila to water and salt stress. J. Plant Physiol. 167 1342–1350. 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.05.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Asada K. (2006). Production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in chloroplasts and their functions. Plant Physiol. 141 391–396. 10.1104/pp.106.082040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Avsian-Kretchmer O., Gueta-Dahan Y., Lev-Yadun S., Gollop R., Ben-Hayyim G. (2004). The salt-stress signal transduction pathway that activates the gpx1 promoter is mediated by intracellular H2O2, different from the pathway induced by extracellular H2O2. Plant Physiol. 135 1685–1696. 10.1104/pp.104.041921 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Balazadeh S., Jaspert N., Arif M., Mueller-Roeber B., Maurino V. G. (2012). Expression of ROS-responsive genes and transcription factors after metabolic formation of H2O2 in chloroplasts. Front. Plant Sci. 3:234 10.3389/fpls.2012.00234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Baxter A., Mittler R., Suzuki N. (2014). ROS as key players in plant stress signalling. J. Exp. Bot. 65 1229–1240. 10.1093/jxb/ert375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bestwick C. S., Brown I. R., Bennett M. H., Mansfield J. W. (1997). Localization of hydrogen peroxide accumulation during the hypersensitive reaction of lettuce cells to Pseudomonas syringae pv phaseolicola. Plant Cell 9 209–221. 10.1105/tpc.9.2.209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Borisova M. M. M., Kozuleva M. A., Rudenko N. N., Naydov I. A., Klenina I. B., Ivanov B. N. (2012). Photosynthetic electron flow to oxygen and diffusion of hydrogen peroxide through the chloroplast envelope via aquaporins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1817 1314–1321. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.02.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bose J., Rodrigo-Moreno A., Shabala S. (2014). ROS homeostasis in halophytes in the context of salinity stress tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 65 1241–1257. 10.1093/jxb/ert430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chang L., Guo A., Jin X., Yang Q., Wang D., Sun Y., et al. (2015). The beta subunit of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase is an important factor for maintaining photosynthesis and plant development under salt stress-based on an integrative analysis of the structural, physiological and proteomic changes in chloroplasts in Thellungiella halophila. Plant Sci. 236 223–238. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.04.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Delaunay A., Pflieger D., Barrault M. B., Vinh J., Toledano M. B. (2002). A thiol peroxidase is an H2O2 receptor and redox-transducer in gene activation. Cell 111 471–481. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01048-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dobrev P. I., Kamínek M. (2002). Fast and efficient separation of cytokinins from auxin and abscisic acid and their purification using mixed-mode solid-phase extraction. J. Chromatogr. A 950 21–29. 10.1016/S0021-9673(02)00024-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dobrev P. I., Vankova R. (2012). Quantification of abscisic acid, cytokinin, and auxin content in salt-stressed plant tissues. Methods Mol. Biol. 913 251–261. 10.1007/978-1-61779-986-0_17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ellouzi H., Hamed K. B., Hernández I., Cela J., Müller M., Magné C., et al. (2014). A comparative study of the early osmotic, ionic, redox and hormonal signaling response in leaves and roots of two halophytes and a glycophyte to salinity. Planta 240 1299–1317. 10.1007/s00425-014-2154-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fahnenstich H., Scarpeci T. E., Valle E. M., Flügge U. I., Maurino V. G. (2008). Generation of hydrogen peroxide in chloroplasts of Arabidopsis overexpressing glycolate oxidase as an inducible system to study oxidative stress. Plant Physiol. 148 719–729. 10.1104/pp.108.126789 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fryer M. J., Ball L., Oxborough K., Karpinski S., Mullineaux P. M., Baker N. R. (2003). Control of Ascorbate Peroxidase 2 expression by hydrogen peroxide and leaf water status during excess light stress reveals a functional organisation of Arabidopsis leaves. Plant J. 33 691–705. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01656.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gadjev I., Vanderauwera S., Gechev T. S., Laloi C., Minkov I. N., Shulaev V., et al. (2006). Transcriptomic footprints disclose specificity of reactive oxygen species signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 141 436–445. 10.1104/pp.106.078717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Galvez-Valdivieso G., Mullineaux P. M. (2010). The role of reactive oxygen species in signalling from chloroplasts to the nucleus. Physiol. Plant. 138 430–439. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.01331.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gao F., Chen J., Ma T., Li H., Wang N., Li Z., et al. (2014). The glutathione peroxidase gene family in Thellungiella salsuginea: genome-wide identification, classification, and gene and protein expression analysis under stress conditions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 15 3319–3335. 10.3390/ijms15023319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gao F., Zhou Y., Zhu W., Li X., Fan L., Zhang G. (2009). Proteomic analysis of cold stress-responsive proteins in Thellungiella rosette leaves. Planta 230 1033–1046. 10.1007/s00425-009-1003-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Geisler M., Kleczkowski L. A., Karpinski S. (2006). A universal algorithm for genome-wide in silicio identification of biologically significant gene promoter putative cis-regulatory-elements; identification of new elements for reactive oxygen species and sucrose signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 45 384–398. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02634.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gong Q., Li P., Ma S., Indu Rupassara S., Bohnert H. J. (2005). Salinity stress adaptation competence in the extremophile Thellungiella halophila in comparison with its relative Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 44 826–839. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02587.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hopkins J., Tudhope G. R. (1973). Glutathione peroxidase in human red cells in health and disease. Br. J. Haematol. 25 563–575. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1973.tb01768.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hou Q., Bartels D. (2015). Comparative study of the aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH). gene superfamily in the glycophyte Arabidopsis thaliana and Eutrema halophytes. Ann. Bot. 115 465–479. 10.1093/aob/mcu152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Inan G., Zhang Q., Li P., Wang Z., Cao Z., Zhang H., et al. (2004). Salt cress. A halophyte and cryophyte Arabidopsis relative model system and its applicability to molecular genetic analyses of growth and development of extremophiles. Plant Physiol. 135 1718–1737. 10.1104/pp.104.041723 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ismail A., Seo M., Takebayashi Y., Kamiya Y., Eiche E., Nick P. (2014). Salt adaptation requires suppression of jasmonate signaling. Protoplasma 251 881–898. 10.1007/s00709-013-0591-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jajić I., Sarna T., Szewczyk G., Strzałka K. (2015). Changes in production of reactive oxygen species in illuminated thylakoids isolated during development and senescence of barley. J. Plant Physiol. 184 49–56. 10.1016/j.jplph.2015.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jiang Y., Yang B., Harris N. S., Deyholos M. K. (2007). Comparative proteomic analysis of NaCl stress-responsive proteins in Arabidopsis roots. J. Exp. Bot. 58 3591–3607. 10.1093/jxb/erm207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno M., Płachno B. J. (2012). Are there symplastic connections between the endosperm and embryo in some angiosperms?-a lesson from the Crassulaceae family. Protoplasma 249 1081–1089. 10.1007/s00709-011-0352-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Laloi C., Stachowiak M., Pers-Kamczyc E., Warzych E., Murgia I., Apel K. (2007). Cross-talk between singlet oxygen-and hydrogen peroxide-dependent signaling of stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104 672–677. 10.1073/pnas.0609063103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Li P., Mane S. P., Sioson A. A., Robinet C. V., Heath L. S., Bohnert H. J., et al. (2006). Effects of chronic ozone exposure on gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes and in Thellungiella halophila. Plant Cell Environ. 29 854–868. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01465.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Libik-Konieczny M., Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno M., Desel C., Michalec-Warzecha Ż, Miszalski Z., Konieczny R. (2015). The localization of NADPH oxidase and reactive oxygen species in in vitro-cultured Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L. hypocotyls discloses their differing roles in rhizogenesis. Protoplasma 252 477–487. 10.1007/s00709-014-0692-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lichtenthaler H. K., Buschmann C. (2001). “Chlorophylls and carotenoids: measurement and characterization by UV-VIS spectroscopy,” in Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry eds Wrolstad R. E., Acree T. E., An H., Decker E. A., Penner M. H., Reid D. S., et al. (New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc; ) F4.3.1–F4.3.8. [Google Scholar]
  36. Miao Y., Lv D., Wang P., Wang X. C., Chen J., Miao C., et al. (2006). An Arabidopsis glutathione peroxidase functions as both a redox transducer and a scavenger in abscisic acid and drought stress responses. Plant Cell 18 2749–2766. 10.1105/tpc.106.044230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. M’rah S., Ouerghi Z., Berthomieu C., Havaux M., Jungas C., Hajji M., et al. (2006). Effects of NaCl on the growth, ion accumulation and photosynthetic parameters of Thellungiella halophila. J. Plant Physiol. 163 1022–1031. 10.1016/j.jplph.2005.07.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. M’rah S., Ouerghi Z., Eymery F., Rey P., Hajji M., Grignon C., et al. (2007). Efficiency of biochemical protection against toxic effects of accumulated salt differentiates Thellungiella halophila from Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Plant Physiol. 164 375–384. 10.1016/j.jplph.2006.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mubarakshina M. M., Ivanov B. N., Naydov I. A., Hillier W., Badger M. R., Krieger-Liszkay A. (2010). Production and diffusion of chloroplastic H2O2 and its implication to signalling. J. Exp. Bot. 61 3577–3587. 10.1093/jxb/erq171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Nakano Y., Asada K. (1981). Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 22 867–880. [Google Scholar]
  41. Niewiadomska E., Bilger W., Gruca M., Mulisch M., Miszalski Z., Krupinska K. (2011). CAM-related changes in chloroplastic metabolism of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L. Planta 233 275–285. 10.1007/s00425-010-1302-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Niewiadomska E., Polzien L., Desel C., Rozpadek P., Miszalski Z., Krupinska K. (2009). Spatial patterns of senescence and development-dependent distribution of reactive oxygen species in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaves. J. Plant Physiol. 166 1057–1068. 10.1016/j.jplph.2008.12.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Niewiadomska E., Wiciarz M. (2015). “Adaptations of chloroplastic metabolism in halophytic plants”, in Progress in Botany eds Lüttge U., Beyschlag W. (Basel: Springer; ) 177–193. [Google Scholar]
  44. op den Camp R. G., Przybyla D., Ochsenbein C., Laloi C., Kim C., Danon A., et al. (2003). Rapid induction of distinct stress responses after the release of singlet oxygen in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 15 2320–2332. 10.1105/tpc.014662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Pang Q., Chen S., Dai S., Chen Y., Wang Y., Yan X. (2010). Comparative proteomics of salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and Thellungiella halophila. J. Proteome Res. 9 2584–2599. 10.1021/pr100034f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Pang Q., Guo J., Chen S., Chen Y., Zhang L., Fei M., et al. (2012). Effect of salt treatment on the glucosinolate-myrosinase system in Thellungiella salsuginea. Plant Soil 355 363–374. 10.1007/s11104-011-1108-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Pedras M. S. C., Adio A. M. (2008). Phytoalexins and phytoanticipins from the wild crucifers Thellungiella halophila and Arabidopsis thaliana: rapalexin A, wasalexins and camalexin. Phytochemistry 69 889–893. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.10.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Pottosin I., Shabala S. (2016). Transport across chloroplast membranes: optimizing photosynthesis for adverse environmental conditions. Mol. Plant 9 356–370. 10.1016/j.molp.2015.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Rastogi A., Yadav D. K., Szymańska R., Kruk J., Sedlářová M., Pospišil P. (2014). Singlet oxygen scavenging activity of tocopherol and plastochromanol in Arabidopsis thaliana: relevance to photooxidative stress. Plant Cell Environ. 37 392–401. 10.1111/pce.12161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sewelam N., Jaspert N., Van Der Kelen K., Tognetti V. B., Schmitz J., Frerigmann H., et al. (2014). Spatial H2O2 signaling specificity: H2O2 from chloroplasts and peroxisomes modulates the plant transcriptome differentially. Mol. Plant 7 1191–1210. 10.1093/mp/ssu070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Stepien P., Johnson G. N. (2009). Contrasting responses of photosynthesis to salt stress in the glycophyte Arabidopsis and the halophyte Thellungiella: role of the plastid terminal oxidase as an alternative electron sink. Plant Physiol. 149 1154–1165. 10.1104/pp.108.132407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Suzuki N., Koussevitzky S., Mittler R., Miller G. (2012). ROS and redox signalling in the response of plants to abiotic stress. Plant Cell Environ. 35 259–270. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02336.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Taji T., Seki M., Satou M., Sakurai T., Kobayashi M., Ishiyama K., et al. (2004). Comparative genomics in salt tolerance between Arabidopsis and Arabidopsis-related halophyte salt cress using Arabidopsis microarray. Plant Physiol. 135 1697–1709. 10.1104/pp.104.039909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Tiwari A., Rác M., Pospíšil P. (2013). Formation of superoxide anion and carbon-centered radicals by photosystem II under high light and heat stress-EPR spin-trapping study. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 45 551–559. 10.1007/s10863-013-9523-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Uzilday B., Ozgur R., Sekmen A. H., Yildiztugay E., Turkan I. (2015). Changes in the alternative electron sinks and antioxidant defence in chloroplasts of the extreme halophyte Eutrema parvulum (Thellungiella parvula) under salinity. Ann. Bot. 115 449–463. 10.1093/aob/mcu184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wiciarz M., Gubernator B., Kruk J., Niewiadomska E. (2015). Enhanced chloroplastic generation of H2O2 in stress-resistant Thellungiella salsuginea in comparison to Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol. Plant. 153 467–476. 10.1111/ppl.12248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wiciarz M., Niewiadomska E., Kruk J. (2016). Different effects of salt stress on low molecular antioxidants and redox state of photosynthetic electron carriers of Eutrema salsugineum (halophyte) and Arabidopsis thaliana (glycophyte). Acta Physiol. Plant. (in press). [Google Scholar]
  58. Wong C. E., Li Y., Labbe A., Guevara D., Nuin P., Whitty B., et al. (2006). Transcriptional profiling implicates novel interactions between abiotic stress and hormonal responses in Thellungiella, a close relative of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 140 1437–1450. 10.1104/pp.105.070508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wu H. J., Zhang Z., Wang J. Y., Oh D. H., Dassanayake M., Liu B., et al. (2012). Insights into salt tolerance from the genome of Thellungiella salsuginea. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109 12219–12224. 10.1073/pnas.1209954109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Yamane K., Taniguchi M., Miyake H. (2012). Salinity-induced subcellular accumulation of H2O2 in leaves of rice. Protoplasma 249 301–308. 10.1007/s00709-011-0280-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES