Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2016 Jul 6;67(15):4779–4789. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw257

Protein N-terminal acetylation is required for embryogenesis in Arabidopsis

Jinlin Feng 1,1,, Ruiqi Li 1,1, Junya Yu 1, Shuangshuang Ma 1,, Chunyan Wu 1, Yan Li 1, Ying Cao 1, Ligeng Ma 1,*
PMCID: PMC4973746  PMID: 27385766

Highlight

NatA, an N-terminal acetyltransferase, is required for asymmetric division of the hypophysis and early embryonic patterning in Arabidopsis, and provides a link between protein N-terminal acetylation and embryogenesis in plants.

Key words: Arabidopsis, asymmetric division, embryogenesis, hypophysis, NatA, protein N-terminal acetylation.

Abstract

Early embryonic development generates precursors of all major cell types in Arabidopsis. Among these precursors, the hypophysis divides asymmetrically to form the progenitors of the quiescent center and columella stem cells. A great deal has been learnt about the mechanisms that control the asymmetric division of the hypophysis and embryogenesis at the transcriptional level; however, no evidence of regulation at the co- or post-translational level has been reported. Here, we show that mutation of the catalytic subunit (Naa10) or auxiliary subunit (Naa15) of NatA, an N-terminal acetyltransferase that catalyzes protein N-terminal acetylation, produces an embryo-lethal phenotype. In addition, Naa10 and Naa15 were found to interact physically in planta. Further analysis revealed that the observed embryonic patterning defects started at the early globular stage and that the asymmetric division of the hypophysis was irregular; thus, no quiescent center progenitor cells were generated in naa10 and naa15 embryos. We further observed that the polar distributions of auxin and its efflux carrier PIN1 were disturbed in naa10 embryos. Our results suggest that NatA is required for asymmetric division of the hypophysis and early embryonic patterning in Arabidopsis, and provides a link between protein N-terminal acetylation and embryogenesis in plants.

Introduction

Embryogenesis initiates higher plant development. Following fertilization, the zygote elongates and divides asymmetrically into a large basal cell and a small apical cell. The basal cell and its daughter cells continue to expand longitudinally and divide transversely to produce a file of cells. The uppermost daughter of the basal cell is the hypophysis, which generates the progenitors of the quiescent center (QC) and columella stem cells through asymmetric division at the globular stage (Scheres et al., 1994; ten Hove et al., 2015). Meanwhile, the apical cell generates the entire embryo, except for the QC and columella stem cells, by following a predictable sequence of cell divisions (Jenik et al., 2007; Lau et al., 2012). Cell fate during embryogenesis is determined at the globular stage; thereafter, in Arabidopsis development proceeds according to an internal genetic program (Jenik et al., 2007; ten Hove et al., 2015).

The specification of the hypophysis is regulated by auxin; thus, mutations affecting auxin responses, perception, transport, or biogenesis can cause defects in the division of the hypophysis and formation of the root meristem (Robert et al., 2015; Smit and Weijers, 2015). An auxin response maximum exists in the hypophysis; it is generated by polar localization of the auxin efflux transporter PIN1 and polar auxin transport (Friml et al., 2003). This response maximum triggers changes in gene expression that control the specification of the hypophysis. There are at least three transcriptional regulatory pathways involved in auxin-mediated gene expression and hypophysis specification in Arabidopsis: (1) an auxin-responsive transcription factor, MP/AFR5, interacts with BDL/IAA12 to directly target TOM7, a bHLH transcription factor gene (Hardtke and Berleth, 1998; Hamann et al., 2002; Schlereth et al., 2010); (2) AFR9, another auxin-responsive transcription factor, works antagonistically with IAA10 to mediate the response to auxin and specification of the hypophysis (Rademacher et al., 2012); and (3) TPL, a transcriptional corepressor, targets PLT family genes (Aida et al., 2004; Long et al., 2006; Galinha et al., 2007). These pathways are integrated and co-operate to control hypophysis specification. In addition, homeobox transcription factor WOX family genes are involved in the control of hypophysis specification and early embryonic patterning in Arabidopsis (Haecker et al., 2004; Breuninger et al., 2008). Thus, much is known about the mechanisms underlying hypophysis specification and early embryonic patterning at the transcriptional level. However, little is known about its regulation at the co- or post-translational level.

N-terminal acetylation is one of the most common co-translational modifications in eukaryotes; about 50% of the proteins in yeast, 70–80% of the proteins in flies, and 80–90% of the proteins in humans and Arabidopsis undergo N-terminal acetylation (Silva and Martinho, 2015). N-terminal acetylation is catalyzed by a group of conserved N-terminal acetyltransferases (NATs). There are six distinct NATs in eukaryotes (NatA to NatF). Some NATs are protein complexes that require different catalytic and auxiliary subunits (e.g., NatA, NatB, NatC, and NatE), while others are able to catalyze protein N-terminal acetylation independently of protein partners (NatD and NatF) (Starheim et al., 2012). Protein N-terminal acetylation is involved in multiple cellular functions, including the regulation of protein–protein interactions, the control of protein stability by targeting certain proteins to the cell membrane for degradation, and the inhibition of protein targeting to the secretory pathway (Arnesen, 2011). Thus, protein N-terminal acetylation is a major determinant of the lifespan of various cellular proteins.

Pesaresi et al. (2003) reported that NatC is required for the biosynthesis of photosystem II core proteins in plants and for maintaining the abundance of thylakoid multiprotein complexes. Ferrandez-Ayela et al. (2013) demonstrated that mutations in the auxiliary subunit of NatB caused pleiotropic developmental defects, including defects in flowering-time regulation and defects in leaf, inflorescence, flower, fruit, and embryo development. Xu et al. (2015) revealed that a Nod-like receptor, SNC1, undergoes N-terminal acetylation by both NatA and NatB at its first and second methionine residues, respectively. NatA-mediated acetylation is a degradation signal, while NatB-mediated acetylation functions to stabilize SNC1 (Xu et al., 2015). Thus, protein N-terminal acetylation is required for plant immune responses. Linster et al. (2015) verified that drought stress decreased the level of N-terminal-acetylated proteins, that abscisic acid down-regulated the abundance of NatA, and that decreases in NatA and N-terminal-acetylated protein abundance were necessary for drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. It was also reported that leaf-type FERREDOXIN-NADP+ OXIDOREDUCTASE is N-terminally acetylated in Arabidopsis; however, the function of this modification is not understood (Lehtimäki et al., 2014). These results suggest that protein N-terminal acetylation plays a critical role in plant development and survival.

In the present study, we found that mutations of Naa10 and Naa15, the catalytic and auxiliary subunits of NatA, respectively, led to disturbances in polarized auxin distribution and/or the auxin response maximum, and PIN1 subcellular localization in Arabidopsis embryos, resulting in defects in early embryonic patterning, including defects in the asymmetric division of the hypophysis and root meristem formation. Thus, this work demonstrates the critical role of NatA in embryonic patterning and provides a link between protein N-terminal acetylation and embryogenesis in plants.

Materials and methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

All plant materials used in this study were in the Columbia-0 ecotype (Col-0) background of Arabidopsis thaliana. The three A. thaliana mutants, naa10-1 (CS850295), naa15-1 (CS836292), and naa15-3 (CS24056), were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC; Columbus, OH, USA)). The T-DNA insertion sites in the three mutants were confirmed by PCR and sequencing. The primers used for PCR are given in Supplementary Table S1 at JXB online. Plant lines carrying DR5::GFP and pPIN1::PIN1-GFP were also obtained from the ABRC. Seeds were sterilized and placed on Murashige and Skoog medium containing 0.3% agar and 1% sucrose. After stratification in the dark at 4 °C for 3 d, the plates were transferred to a Percival CU36L5 growth chamber (Percival Scientific, Perry, IA, USA) and held at 22 °C for 16h in the light and at 18 °C for 8h in the dark. After 8 d of growth, the plants were transferred to soil and cultivated in a greenhouse using the same photoperiod and temperature conditions.

Plant lines carrying different markers were crossed with naa10-1 +/−, and the progeny were identified by PCR and observed for GFP fluorescence under a fluorescence microscope. Those naa10-1 +/− mutants carrying a homozygous GFP fluorescence marker were used in our subsequent experiments.

Complementation of the naa10 and naa15 mutations

The Naa10 coding sequence (CDS) fused to the 7xMyc tag driven by the 35S promoter was cloned into the binary vector pCambia1300. The resulting 35S::Naa10-Myc plasmid was introduced into naa10-1 +/− by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation (Clough and Bent, 1998). T1 plants were selected using hygromycin and Basta plates, and then genotyped by PCR. The Naa15 CDS fused to 3xFlag driven by its native promoter [1400bp upstream of the 5′-untranslated region (UTR)] was cloned into pCambia1300. The resulting pNaa15::Naa15-Flag plasmid was introduced into naa15-3 +/− by A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation. T1 plants were selected on hygromycin and Basta plates, and then genotyped by PCR. The primers used for cloning the CDS of Naa10 and Naa15 are included in Supplementary Table S1.

Ovule clearing and embryo observation

Fresh embryos were cleared for visualization using Hoyer’s solution [chloral hydrate:glycerol:water, 8:1:3 (w/v/v)] for minutes to hours depending on the developmental stage of each embryo (Berleth and Jürgens, 1993). Next, the cleared ovules with embryos were examined by differential interference contrast microscopy under a Zeiss Image 2 fluorescence microscope (Oberkochen, Germany). Confocal laser scanning microscopy (Zeiss LSM 5 Live confocal line-scanning microscope) was used to detect the fluorescent signals of the molecular markers. The excitation light source was set at 488nm for the detection of the GFP fluorescent signal, and 405nm for the detection of the DAPI fluorescent signal. Fresh embryos were isolated from ovules, mounted in 6% glycerol, and then observed by confocal microscopy.

Yeast two-hybrid interaction assay

All of the genes tested were cloned into two vectors (pGADT7 and pGBKT7) and cotransformed into yeast strain AH109. The primers used for cloning the CDS of Naa10 and Naa15 are included in Supplementary Table S1. Transformation, yeast growth, and protein extraction were performed as described in the Clontech Yeast Protocols Handbook.

Preparation of anti-Naa15 antibodies

The truncated protein corresponding to amino acid residues 610–872 of Arabidopsis Naa15 was used as the antigen to immunize rabbits to generate specific antibodies against Naa15.

Immunoprecipitation

In Nicotiana benthamiana, total protein from leaves inoculated with agrobacterial strains containing either 35S::Naa10-Myc or 35S::Naa15-Flag, as well as 35S::Naa10-Myc and 35S::Naa15-Flag, were extracted with Native Extraction Buffer 1 (Liu et al., 2010) and immunoprecipitated with anti-Myc or -Flag antibodies (Sigma, Madison, WI, USA). The immunoprecipitates were then separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and immunoblotted with anti-Flag or -Myc antibodies.

In A. thaliana, total protein from wild-type or complemented naa10-1 –/– transgenic plants was extracted using IP buffer (100mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, 1mM PMSF, and a protease inhibitor cocktail), and then immunoprecipitated with anti-Myc or -Naa15 antibodies. The immunoprecipitates were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with anti-Naa15 or -Myc antibodies.

Results

Naa10 is required for embryogenesis in Arabidopsis

To elucidate the role of protein N-terminal acetylation in plants, we investigated the function of NatA in Arabidopsis. A preliminary analysis revealed that Naa10, the catalytic subunit of NatA, is evolutionarily conserved from yeasts to humans and plants (see Supplementary Fig. S1).

To determine the role of Naa10 in Arabidopsis development, we obtained a T-DNA insertion mutant of Naa10 from the ABRC. Insertion of the T-DNA into the first intron of Naa10 was confirmed by sequencing (Fig. 1A). No homozygotes were isolated from the progeny of a heterozygous naa10 plant, and the ratio of wild-type to heterozygous plants was about 1:2 (Fig. 1B), indicating that the mutation was lethal in the homozygous state. In support of this prediction, about one-quarter of the seeds were aborted in the siliques of naa10 heterozygous plants (Fig. 1C).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The mutation of Naa10 produced an embryo-lethal phenotype. (A) Schematic diagram of the T-DNA insertion in Arabidopsis Naa10. The mutant, naa10-1 (CS850295), had a T-DNA insertion in intron 1. Grey boxes indicate exons, a black line indicates the intron, white boxes indicate UTRs, and arrowheads indicate the positions of the primers used for genotyping. (B) Genotyping of naa10-1 by PCR. The ratio of wild-type to heterozygous naa10-1 plants is shown. (C) Seed development in wild-type and naa10-1 +/–. The percentages of aborted seeds in wild-type and heterozygous naa10-1 siliques are shown. (D) Genotyping of complemented naa10-1 +/– transgenic plants. The Naa10 CDS fused to the 7xMyc tag driven by the 35S promoter was cloned into pCambia1300. The resulting 35S::Naa10-Myc plasmid was introduced into naa10-1 +/– by A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation. T1 plants were selected using hygromycin and Basta, and then genotyped by PCR as in (B). (E) Seed development in wild-type plants and naa10-1 +/– plants complemented with Naa10-Myc at the T1 and T3 generations. The ratios of aborted seeds from plants with different genetic backgrounds are shown. (F) Twenty-five-day-old wild-type plants and naa10-1 -/–plants complemented with Naa10-Myc at the T1 generation. Lines 17 and 32 are independent, representative naa10-1 –/–-complemented lines.

To verify that the embryonic phenotype observed in naa10 was due to the defect in Naa10, we transferred Myc-tagged Naa10 (Naa10-Myc) into heterozygous naa10 plants. Among 122 independent transgenic lines, homozygous naa10 plants were identified in six lines at the T1 generation (χ 2=6.15, P<0.05) (Fig. 1D). In addition, the embryonic defect observed in naa10 was complemented by the transformation of Naa10 into naa10 plants (χ 2=519.34, P<0.01 for naa10 +/– and naa10 +/– Naa10-MYC transgenic plants; χ 2=3.71, P>0.05 for wild-type and naa10 +/- Naa10-MYC transgenic plants) (Fig. 1E), and adult homozygous naa10 plants harboring Naa10-Myc were indistinguishable from wild-type plants (Fig. 1F). These results suggest that Naa10 is required for embryogenesis in Arabidopsis.

Naa10 is required for asymmetric division of the hypophysis and formation of the QC in the root meristem

Embryogenesis starts with the division of the zygote, and it proceeds through several developmental stages to produce a mature embryo. To determine the developmental stage and developmental process mediated by Naa10, we analyzed embryonic development in wild-type and naa10 plants in detail. The embryonic development of wild-type and naa10 plants was indistinguishable from the one-cell stage to the dermatogen stage (Fig. 2A; Table 1). The earliest stage at which a defect was observed in naa10 was the early globular stage (Fig. 2B; Table 1). When 100% of the wild-type embryos were at the heart stage [5 d after pollination (DAP)], about 20% of the embryos in the siliques of heterozygous naa10 plants were still in the early or late globular stage (Fig. 2B; Table 1). Furthermore, about 20% of the embryos remained at the globular stage after all of the embryos in the wild-type plants and 80% of the embryos in the siliques of the heterozygous naa10 plants had reached maturity (Fig. 2B; Table 1). These data indicate that Naa10 is required for embryogenesis beginning at the early globular stage.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Naa10 is required for asymmetric division of the hypophysis and formation of the QC in the root meristem during embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. (A) Embryogenesis in wild-type (a–f) and naa10-1 +/– (g–j) plants was examined by differential interference contrast microscopy. No morphological changes between wild-type and naa10-1 –/– were observed before the dermatogen stage (d and j). Horizontal, asymmetric division of the hypophysis is marked with a white line in (f). (a, g) 1-cell stage; (b, h) 2/4-cell stage; (c, i) octant stage; (d, j) dermatogen stage; (e) early globular stage; (f) late globular stage. Scale bars =10 μm. (B) Embryogenesis in wild-type (a’–d’) and naa10-1 +/– (all other images) plants examined under differential interference contrast microscopy. Flowers of both wild-type and naa10-1 +/– plants were pollinated with self-pollen; fixed at 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 DAP; cleared; and observed under differential interference contrast microscopy. The proportions of naa10-1 +/– embryos at different stages are shown here and in Table 1. (a2) Dermatogen stage; (a3) between the dermatogen stage and early globular stage; (a4, b2) early globular stage; (c2, d2) sunflower-like globular stage embryos. Abnormal division of the hypophysis is marked with a white line in a5 (askew division of the hypophysis), b3 (distorted lens-shaped cell), b4 (askew division of the hypophysis), and b5 (vertical division of the hypophysis). Scale bars =10 μm.

Table 1.

Developmental progression of embryogenesis in wild-type, naa10-1 +/–, and naa15-3 +/– plants

DAP 1-Cell 2/4-Cell Octant Dermatogen Early
globular
Late
globular
Heart
stage
Torpedo
embryo
Late torpedo
embryo
Walking-stick stage No. of seeds
examined
Wild-type plants
2 1.9% 93.3% 4.8% 210
3 0.7% 1.0% 52.8% 45.5% 290
4 8.2% 91.8% 329
5 100% 349
6 100% 356
7 100% 356
8 100% 360
naa10-1 +/–plants
2 5.7% 87.0% 7.3% 228
3 4.5% 17.3% 53.5% 24.7% 404
4 2.8% 17.5% 14.7% 64.9% 285
5 19.8% 80.2% 328
6 20.4% 79.6% 377
7 22.6% 77.4% 368
8 20.0% 80.0% 365
naa15-3 +/- plants
2 6.3% 89.3% 4.4% 272
3 6.5% 13.8% 61.3% 18.4% 385
4 2.3% 12.3% 6.8% 78.5% 219
5 17.9% 82.1% 336
6 18.3% 81.7% 404
7 16.0% 84.0% 326
8 14.9% 85.1% 322

Root formation is initiated at the globular stage by the transverse, asymmetric division of the hypophysis. This division generates a large basal daughter cell and a small lens-shaped apical daughter cell, which is the progenitor of the QC. Given that the defect in embryogenesis in naa10 emerged at the globular stage (Fig. 2A, B), we examined whether the development of the hypophysis was affected in naa10. Asymmetric division of the hypophysis occurred normally in wild-type plants (Fig. 2A), whereas it was irregular in naa10 plants; no functional QC progenitor was created in naa10 embryos (Fig. 2B). Therefore, Naa10 is required for asymmetric division of the hypophysis and formation of the QC in the root meristem.

The auxin distribution pattern and PIN1 localization were disrupted in naa10 embryos during embryogenesis

Auxin has a profound effect on embryogenesis: the asymmetric distribution of auxin affects both apical–basal and radial patterning. The production of the lens-shaped QC progenitor cell is contingent on the establishment of an apical-to-basal auxin flux and the presence of an embryonic axis at the early globular stage. To determine the pattern of auxin distribution or auxin response in wild-type and naa100 embryos, we first introduced a DR5-GFP reporter into naa10 plants by crossing. Auxin was asymmetrically distributed in the uppermost cells of the suspensor, the hypophysis, and its daughter cells in globular wild-type embryos (Fig. 3), whereas the distribution or/and response of auxin in naa10 embryos at the globular stage was nearly uniform (Fig. 3), indicating that the distribution of auxin or/and response maximum was disrupted in naa10 plants during embryogenesis.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Naa10 is required for local auxin accumulation in the early embryonic stage during embryogenesis. (A–D) and (A’–D’) wild-type embryos; (E–G) and (E’–G’) naa10-1 –/– embryos. (A–G) GFP signal; (A’–G’) merged images. DR5 was expressed in the root pole of the wild-type globular stage (A, A’) and heart stage (B, B’) embryos. DR5 was also expressed in wild-type cotyledon tips (C, C’) and in the vasculature of mature wild-type embryos (D, D’). DR5 was expressed throughout the arrested globular embryo as well as the suspensor in naa10-1 –/– embryos (E–G). (B) and (E), (C) and (F), and (D) and (G) are embryos at the same time after fertilization, respectively. The number of embryos examined was 18, 13, 15, 10, 28, 27 and 22 for (A) to (G), respectively. Scale bars =50 μm.

The asymmetric distribution of auxin in developing embryos is controlled by auxin transport. At the early globular stage, apical-to-basal transport is established by the asymmetric distribution of PIN auxin efflux carriers, and it persists throughout the plant life cycle (Steinmann et al., 1999; Friml et al., 2003). To understand why the asymmetric distribution of auxin was disrupted, we examined the distribution of PIN1 in naa10 embryos. To this end, we transformed PIN1-GFP into naa10 plants by crossing. PIN1 was preferentially localized to the basal membrane in the inner cells of wild-type embryos at the proembryo stage (Fig. 4); this is required for the transport of auxin to the hypophysis and QC. In contrast, the asymmetric localization of PIN1 to the inner cells of the proembryo was missing in naa10 embryos (Fig. 4). Thus, Naa10 may be required for the polar localization of PIN1 to the inner cells of the proembryo and for the asymmetric distribution of auxin in embryos.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Naa10 is required for the polarized localization of PIN1 during early embryogenesis. (A–C) and (A’–C’) wild-type embryos; (D–F) and (D’–F’), naa10-1 –/– embryos. (A–F), GFP signal; (A’–F’), merged images. PIN1 was present on all inner membranes of the proembryo until the dermatogen stage (A, A’); it became localized toward the basal end of the inner cells at the globular stage (B, B’). During the globular stage, PIN1 localization became polarized toward the flanks of the proembryo apex (C, C’). PIN1 was present throughout the basal half of the arrested naa10-1 –/– globular embryos; this was assumed to be the hypophysis and suspensor (D–F and D’–F’). The number of embryos examined was 15, 15, 16, 20, 27 and 22 for (A) to (F), respectively. Scale bars =10 μm.

Mutation of Naa15 produced a similar embryonic phenotype to naa10

Some NATs are protein complexes that utilize different catalytic and auxiliary subunits. Naa10 and Naa15 are the catalytic and auxiliary subunits of NatA, respectively, in yeast and animal cells (Starheim et al., 2012). We found that Naa15 is an evolutionary conserved protein from yeasts to humans and plants (see Supplementary Fig. S2). To examine the function of Naa15 in Arabidopsis, we obtained two naa15 alleles, naa15-1 and naa15-3, from the ABRC. The T-DNA insertion site for each allele was confirmed by sequencing (Fig. 5A). As before, no homozygous plants were isolated from the progeny of a heterozygous naa15 plant, and aborted seeds were observed in the siliques of the two naa15 alleles (Fig. 5B). In addition, the seed-aborted phenotype observed in naa15 was complemented by the transformation of Flag-tagged Naa15 (Naa15-Flag) into naa15 plants, and a homozygote of naa15 was isolated from the transgenic lines (Fig. 5C). These results indicate that, similar to Naa10, Naa15 is required for embryogenesis in Arabidopsis.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

The mutation of Naa15 produced an embryo-lethal phenotype. (A) Schematic diagram of the two T-DNA insertions in Arabidopsis Naa15. The T-DNA insertions in naa15-1 (CS836292) and naa15-3 (CS24056) were in exons 16 and 9, respectively. Grey boxes indicate exons, black lines indicate introns, white boxes indicate UTRs. (B) Seed development in wild-type, naa15-1 +/–, naa15-3 +/–, and naa10-1 +/– plants. The ratios of aborted to normal seeds in siliques from wild-type, naa15-1 +/–, naa15-3 +/–, and naa10-1 +/– plants are shown. (C) Fifteen-day-old wild-type plants and naa15-3 –/– plants complemented with Naa15-Flag at the T1 generation. The Naa15 CDS fused to 3xFlag driven by its native promoter was cloned into pCambia1300. The resulting pNaa15::Naa15-Flag plasmid was introduced into naa15-3 +/– by A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation. T1 plants were selected using hygromycin and Basta, and then genotyped by PCR. Lines 1 and 2 are independent naa15-3 –/–-complemented lines.

Also similar to naa10, the defect in naa15 was first observed at the early globular stage, and naa15 embryos were still at the globular stage when the embryos of Naa15 plants reached maturity (Fig. 6A, B; Table 1). Further, irregular cell division was observed in the hypophysis of naa15 embryos, meaning that no functional QC progenitor was generated (Fig. 6B). Together, our results suggest that both Naa10 and Naa15 are required for embryogenesis in Arabidopsis.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Naa15 is required for asymmetric division of the hypophysis and formation of the QC in the root meristem during embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. (A) Embryogenesis in wild-type (a–f) and naa15-3 +/- (g–j) plants examined under differential interference contrast microscopy. No morphological changes between the wild-type and naa15-3 –/– embryos were observed until the dermatogen stage (d, j). Horizontal, asymmetric division of the hypophysis is marked with a white line in (f). (a, g) 1-cell stage; (b, h) 2/4-cell stage; (c, i) octant stage; (d, j) dermatogen stage; (e) early globular stage; (f) late globular stage. Scale bars =10 μm. (B) Embryogenesis in wild-type (a’–d’) and naa15-3 +/– (all other images) plants was examined under differential interference contrast microscopy. Flowers of both naa15-3 +/– and wild-type plants were pollinated with self-pollen; fixed at 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 DAP; cleared; and then observed under differential interference contrast microscopy. The proportions of naa15-3 +/– embryos at different stages are shown here and in Table 1. (a2) Dermatogen stage; (a3) stage between the dermatogen and early globular stages; (a4, b2) early globular stage; (c2, d2) sunflower-like globular stage embryos. Abnormal division of the hypophysis in naa15-3 –/– is marked with a white line in a5 (askew division of the hypophysis), b3 (distorted lens-shaped cell), b4 (askew division of the hypophysis), and b5 (vertical division of the hypophysis). Scale bars =10 μm.

Mutation of Naa10 or Naa15 causes a defect in male transmission efficiency

In our analysis of naa10 and naa15 plants, we observed that the percentages of aborted seeds and abnormal embryos were less than 25% (Figs 1, 2, 5, and 6; Table 1). If the only function of these genes was in embryogenesis, the percentages of aborted seeds and abnormal embryos would be 25%. This result therefore appears to indicate the existence of defects in the gametocytes of both naa10 and naa15 plants. To examine this prediction, we measured the transmission efficiencies of male and female gametocytes from naa10 or naa15 plants in a reciprocal outcross between wild-type and heterozygous naa10 or naa15 plants. No defect in the transmission efficiency of female gametocytes was detected for naa10 and naa15, whereas a decrease in the transmission efficiency of male gametocytes was detected for naa10 and naa15 (Table 2). Consistent with this result, the gametocyte transmission efficiency was also decreased in self-crossed heterozygous naa10 or naa15 plants (Table 2). Therefore, Naa10 and Naa15 are required for both embryogenesis and male gametocyte development in Arabidopsis.

Table 2.

Segregation of naa10 and naa15 among the progeny of self-crossed and reciprocally outcrossed plants

Recipient × donor No. of progeny Antibiotic resistance Transmission efficiency
Susceptible1 Resistant2
naa10 +/– × Naa10 +/+ 731 373 (51.03%) 358 (48.97%) 95.98%
Naa10 +/+ × naa10 +/– 570 371 (65.09%) 199 (34.91%) 53.64%
naa15 +/– × Naa15 +/+ 425 216 (50.82%) 209 (49.18%) 96.76%
Naa15 +/+ × naa15 +/– 584 395 (67.64%) 189 (32.36%) 47.85%
Self-crosses No. of progeny Antibiotic resistance Ratio of Bar1 to Bar2
Bars Barr
naa10 +/– × naa10 +/– 2211 845 (38.22%) 1366 (61.78%) 1:1.62
naa15 +/– × naa15 +/– 2952 1245 (42.17%) 1707 (57.83%) 1:1.37

1, susceptible to Basta, 2, resistant to Basta.

Naa10 and Naa15 are in the same protein complex

Naa10 and Naa15 are the catalytic and auxiliary subunits of NatA, respectively, in yeast and human cells (Starheim et al., 2012). Naa10 and Naa15 were localized to the cytosol (see Supplementary Fig. S3), consistent with their function as protein NATs. To determine whether they interact and function in the same complex in plants, we first examined their interaction in yeast cells. No interaction between Arabidopsis Naa10 and Naa15 was detected in a yeast two-hybrid assay (Supplementary Fig. S4), indicating either no direct interaction between the proteins or that their interaction is weak or transient. We then examined their interaction in planta using a co (CO)-immunoprecipitation (IP) assay. An interaction between Arabidopsis Naa10 and Naa15 was detected by IP and Co-IP in pairwise labeling and label-swapping experiments conducted in tobacco cells overexpressing Naa10 and Naa15 (Fig. 7A, B).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

In vivo physical interaction between Naa10 and Naa15 in N. benthamiana and Arabidopsis. (A, B) Total proteins from plants inoculated with agrobacterial strains containing either 35S::Naa10-Myc or 35S::Naa15-Flag, as well as 35S::Naa10-Myc and 35S::Naa15-Flag, were extracted and immunoprecipitated with anti-Myc or -Flag antibodies. The immunoprecipitates were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with anti-Flag or -Myc antibodies. The antibodies for immunoprecipitation are indicated above the gels and the antibodies for immunoblotting are indicated to the right of the gels. The star indicates non-specific bands. (C) Total proteins from wild-type and complemented naa10-1 –/– transgenic plants were extracted and then immunoprecipitated with anti-Myc or -Naa15 antibodies. The immunoprecipitates were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with anti-Naa15 or -Myc antibodies.

To examine their interaction in Arabidopsis, we generated anti-Naa15 antibodies by immunizing rabbits with purified bacterial cell-produced Naa15, and complemented naa10 lines expressing Naa10-Myc. Their interaction was confirmed as Naa10 could immunoprecipitate Naa15 (and vice versa) in Arabidopsis (Fig. 7C). Thus, our results suggest that Naa10 and Naa15 exist in the same protein complex. This is consistent with their roles as the catalytic and auxiliary subunits of NatA and the similar phenotypes observed for naa10 and naa15 in Arabidopsis.

Discussion

During early embryonic development in Arabidopsis, the precursors of all major cell types are generated; these precursors give rise to organ initials, which regulate post-embryonic patterning. Therefore, elucidating the mechanisms underlying pattern formation during early embryogenesis is critical for understanding plant development. In the present study, we examined the role of protein N-terminal acetylation in embryogenesis in Arabidopsis.

NatA is required for asymmetric division of the hypophysis and formation of the QC in the root meristem

Naa10 and Naa15 are the catalytic and auxiliary subunits of NatA, respectively, in yeast and human cells (Starheim et al., 2012); they are also conserved in the Arabidopsis genome (see Supplementary Figs S1 and S2). We found that the mutation of Naa10 caused irregular division of the hypophysis, such that no functional QC or columella stem cell was generated (Fig. 2). We also found that the distribution or/and response of auxin in early embryos and localization of PIN1 were disrupted in naa10 embryos during embryogenesis (Figs 3 and 4). The expression of DR5 in early globular embryos of naa10 is strikingly similar to the expression of DR5 in the embryos of pin1/3/4/7 (Robert et al. 2013). Based on Fig. 4, it seems that the expression pattern of PIN1 is affected, more so than the actual intracellular localization in naa10. If PIN1 is missing or not basally localized in the inner cells of the proembryo, the procambium is not formed accurately, which might lead to defects in the asymmetric division of the hypophysis and early embryonic patterning. However, we do not know how protein N-terminal acetylation can affect the expression of PIN1 at this stage. Given that auxin accumulation in the hypophysis is critical for hypophysis differentiation, the aforementioned defects in auxin distribution/auxin response and PIN1 localization may lead to asymmetric division of the hypophysis (or vice versa).

Linster et al. (2015) showed that Naa10 and Naa15 from Arabidopsis interacted in human embryonic kidney 293 cells by expressing Naa10 and Naa15 in this human cell line. This observation was confirmed in the present study, both in tobacco and in Arabidopsis, using anti-tag and -Naa15 antibodies that were generated specifically for this purpose (Fig. 7). We also found that the mutation of Naa10 and Naa15 produced similar phenotypes in the hypophysis of Arabidopsis plants (Figs 2 and 6). These results suggest that NatA is required for asymmetric division of the hypophysis and formation of the QC in the root meristem, and that NatA must be intact to function as an NAT in Arabidopsis.

NatA is required for the correct patterning of lower-tier cells, upper-tier cells, and the entire embryo

Once formed, a zygote undergoes asymmetric division, yielding an apical cell and a basal cell. The apical cell gives rise to the entire embryo, except for its basal end, whereas the basal cell generates the hypophysis and extra-embryonic suspensor (Jenik et al., 2007). We observed that a loss of function in NatA in naa10 and naa15 plants led to a defect in hypophysis differentiation, and that no functional QC or columella stem cell was generated (Figs 2 and 6). However, the effect of NatA on asymmetric division of the hypophysis is not specific, as defects in other parts of the early embryo were observed in both naa10 and naa15 plants (Figs 2 and 6). For example, protodermal cell division was delayed, protodermal cell size was increased, and the outer portion of the embryo was irregular during the early embryonic stage in naa10 and naa15 plants (Figs 2 and 6). In addition, inner-cell division was delayed and irregular, while the shape and separation of the inner cells were difficult to resolve in naa10 and naa15 beginning at the early globular stage (Figs 2 and 6); thus, embryo development in naa10 and naa15 was arrested at the globular stage (Figs 2 and 6). Therefore, NatA is required for patterning of the entire embryo in Arabidopsis.

Protein N-terminal acetylation controls embryogenesis in Arabidopsis

Patterning of the embryo is precisely controlled during embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. Much is known about the mechanisms that regulate embryo development and cell fate determination at the transcriptional level, and a number of transcriptional cascades have been revealed (Schlereth et al., 2010; De Rybel et al., 2013). However, little is known about the regulation of embryo patterning at the co- or post-translational level.

In the present study, we observed that a loss of function of NatA, a conserved NAT, caused defects in cell fate determination in the hypophysis and in the entire embryo (Figs 2 and 6), indicating that protein N-terminal acetylation is required for embryo pattern formation. More than 1000 proteins are N-terminal-acetylated in Arabidopsis (Bienvenut et al., 2012). However, the proteins targeted by NatA and whether their N-terminal acetylation is required for embryo patterning are unknown. The targets of NatA could be proteins known to be required for embryo patterning (e.g. TOM7); however, they could also be unknown proteins. More than ten proteins required for embryogenesis in Arabidopsis are predicted targets of NatA, including ARF9, TOM7, SCR, TOAD2, AGO10, LHW, TPL, WOX5, WOX8, and WOX9 (https://bioweb.i2bc.paris-saclay.fr/terminator3/). It would be interesting to investigate whether these NatA targets mediate embryo pattern formation in Arabidopsis.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data can be found at JXB online.

Table S1. Primers used for PCR.

Figure S1. Naa10 is evolutionarily conserved among eukaryotes.

Figure S2. Naa15 is evolutionarily conserved among eukaryotes.

Figure S3. Subcellular localization of Naa10 and Naa15 in N. benthamiana and Arabidopsis.

Figure S4. No physical interaction was detected between Naa10 and Naa15 in a yeast two-hybrid assay.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Basic Research Program (973 Program) of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2012CB114200 and 2012CB910900), and from the Beijing Municipal Government Science Foundation (CIT&TCD20150102).

Author Contribution

The individual author contributions were as follows: conceptualization, LM and JF; investigation, JF, RL, JY, SM, CW, YL, and YC; writing – original draft, LM and JF; review and editing, LM and JF; funding acquisition, LM and YC; supervision, LM.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Data

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Jessica Habashi for critical reading of the manuscript, and we thank Dr Xianyong Sheng of the Imaging Center, College of life Sciences, Capital Normal University (Beijing, China), for performing the localization of DR5-GFP and PIN1-GFP assay. We have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Aida M, Beis D, Heidstra R, Willemsen V, Blilou I, Galinha C, Nussaume L, Noh Y-S, Amasino R, Scheres B. 2004. The PLETHORA genes mediate patterning of the Arabidopsis root stem cell niche. Cell 119, 109–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnesen T. 2011. Towards a functional understanding of protein N-terminal acetylation. PLoS Biology 9, e1001074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berleth T, Jürgens G. 1993. The role of the monopteros gene in organizing the basal body region of the Arabidopsis embryo. Development 118, 575–587. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bienvenut WN, Sumpton D, Martinez A, Lilla S, Espagne C, Meinnel T, Giglione C. 2012. Comparative large scale characterization of plant versus mammal proteins reveals similar and idiosyncratic N-acetylation features. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 11, M111.015131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Breuninger H, Rikirsch E, Hermann M, Ueda M, Laux T. 2008. Differential expression of WOX genes mediates apical-basal axis formation in the Arabidopsis embryo. Developmental Cell 14, 867–876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clough SJ, Bent AF. 1998. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana . The Plant Journal 16, 735–743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. De Rybel B, Möller B, Yoshida S, Grabowicz I, Barbier de Reuille P, Boeren S, Smith RS, Borst JW, Weijers D. 2013. A bHLH complex controls embryonic vascular tissue establishment and indeterminate growth in Arabidopsis . Developmental Cell 24, 426–437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ferrandez-Ayela A, Micol-Ponce R, Sanchez-Garcıa AB, Alonso-Peral MM, Micol JL, Ponce MR. 2013. Mutation of an Arabidopsis NatB N-alpha-terminal acetylation complex component causes pleiotropic developmental defects. PLoS ONE 8, 80697. [Google Scholar]
  9. Friml J, Vieten A, Sauer M, Weijers D, Schwarz H, Hamann T, Offringa R, Jürgens G. 2003. Efflux-dependent auxin gradients establish the apical-basal axis of Arabidopsis . Nature 426, 147–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Galinha C, Hofhuis H, Luijten M, Willemsen V, Blilou I, Heidstra R, Scheres B. 2007. PLETHORA proteins as dose-dependent master regulators of Arabidopsis root development. Nature 449, 1053–1057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Haecker A, Gross-Hardt R, Geiges B, Sarkar A, Breuninger H, Herrmann M, Laux T. 2004. Expression dynamics of WOX genes mark cell fate decisions during early embryonic patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana . Development 131, 657–668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hamann T, Benkova E, Bäurle I, Kientz M, Jürgens G. 2002. The Arabidopsis BODENLOS gene encodes an auxin response protein inhibiting MONOPTEROS-mediated embryo patterning. Genes & Development 16, 1610–1615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hardtke CS, Berleth T. 1998. The Arabidopsis gene MONOPTEROS encodes a transcription factor mediating embryo axis formation and vascular development. The EMBO Journal 17, 1405–1411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jenik PD, Gillmor CS, Lukowitz W. 2007. Embryonic patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana . Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 23, 207–236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lau S, Slane D, Herud O, Kong J, Jürgens G. 2012. Early embryogenesis in flowering plants: setting up the basic body pattern. Annual Review of Plant Biology 63, 483–506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lehtimäki N, Koskela MM, Dahlström KM, et al. 2014. Posttranslational modifications of FERREDOXIN-NADP+ OXIDOREDUCTASE in Arabidopsis chloroplasts. Plant Physiology 166, 1764–1776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Linster E, Stephan I, Bienvenut WV, et al. 2015. Downregulation of N-terminal acetylation triggers ABA-mediated drought responses in Arabidopsis . Nature Communications 6, 7640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu LJ, Zhang YY, Tang SY, Zhao QZ, Zhang ZH, Zhang HW, Dong L, Guo HS, Xie Q. 2010. An efficient system to detect protein ubiquitination by agroinfiltration in Nicotiana benthamiana . The Plant Journal 61, 893–903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Long JA, Ohno C, Smith ZR, Meyerowitz EM. 2006. TOPLESS regulates apical embryonic fate in Arabidopsis . Science 312, 1520–1523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pesaresi P, Gardner NA, Masiero S, Dietzmann A, Eichacker L, Wickner R, Salamini F, Leister D. 2003. Cytoplasmic N-terminal protein acetylation is required for efficient photosynthesis in Arabidopsis . The Plant Cell 15, 1817–1832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rademacher EH, Lokerse AS, Schlereth A, et al. 2012. Different auxin response machineries control distinct cell fates in the early plant embryo. Developmental Cell 22, 211–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Robert HS, Grones P, Stepanova AN, Robles LM, Lokerse AS, Alonso JM, Weijers D, Friml J. 2013. Local auxin sources orient the apical-basal axis in Arabidopsis embryos. Current Biology 23, 2506–2512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Robert HS, Grunewald W, Sauer M, Cannoot B, Soriano M, Swarup R, Weijers D, Bennett M, Boutilier K, Friml J. 2015. Plant embryogenesis requires AUX/LAX-mediated auxin influx. Development 142, 702–711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Scheres B, Wolkenfelt H, Willemsen V, Terlouw M, Lawson E, Dean C, Weisbeek P. 1994. Embryonic origin of the Arabidopsis primary root and root meristem initials. Development 120, 2475–2487. [Google Scholar]
  25. Schlereth A, Moller B, Liu W, Kientz M, Flipse J, Rademacher EH, Schmid M, Jurgens G, Weijers D. 2010. MONOPTEROS controls embryonic root initiation by regulating a mobile transcription factor. Nature 464, 913–916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Silva RD, Martinho RG. 2015. Developmental roles of protein N-terminal acetylation. Proteomics 15, 2402–2409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Smit ME, Weijers D. 2015. The role of auxin signaling in early embryo pattern formation. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 28, 99–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Starheim KK, Gevaert K, Arnesen T. 2012. Protein N-terminal acetyltransferases: when the start matters. Trends in Biochemical Science 37, 152–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Steinmann T, Geldner N, Grebe M, Mangold S, Jackson CL, Paris S, Gälweiler L, Palme K, Jürgens G. 1999. Coordinated polar localization of auxin efflux carrier PIN1 by GNOM ARF GEF. Science 286, 316–318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. ten Hove CA, Lu KJ, Weijers D. 2015. Building a plant: cell fate specification in the early Arabidopsis embryo. Development 142, 420–430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Xu F, Huang Y, Li L, et al. 2015. Two N-terminal acetyltransferases antagonistically regulate the stability of a Nod-Like receptor in Arabidopsis . The Plant Cell 27, 1547–1562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES