Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1992 Aug 15;89(16):7516–7520. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.16.7516

Pyrimidine dimers in DNA initiate systemic immunosuppression in UV-irradiated mice.

M L Kripke 1, P A Cox 1, L G Alas 1, D B Yarosh 1
PMCID: PMC49741  PMID: 1502162

Abstract

Exposing the skin of mice to UV radiation interferes with the induction of delayed and contact hypersensitivity immune responses initiated at nonirradiated sites. The identity of the molecular target in the skin for these immunosuppressive effects of UV radiation remains controversial. To test the hypothesis that DNA is the target for UV-induced systemic immunosuppression, we exposed C3H mice to UV radiation and then used liposomes to deliver a dimer-specific excision repair enzyme into the epidermis in situ. The application of T4 endonuclease V encapsulated in liposomes to UV-irradiated mouse skin decreased the number of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers in the epidermis and prevented suppression of both delayed and contact hypersensitivity responses. Moreover, the formation of suppressor lymphoid cells was inhibited. Control, heat-inactivated endonuclease encapsulated in liposomes had no effect. These studies demonstrate that DNA is the major target of UV radiation in the generation of systemic immunosuppression and suggest that the primary molecular event mediating these types of immunosuppression by UV radiation is the formation of pyrimidine dimers. Furthermore, they illustrate that the delivery of lesion-specific DNA repair enzymes to living skin after UV irradiation is an effective tool for restoring immune function and suggest that this approach may be broadly applicable to preventing other alterations caused by DNA damage.

Full text

PDF
7516

Images in this article

7518Image
on p.7518
7519Image
on p.7519

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ananthaswamy H. N., Fisher M. S. Photoreactivation of ultraviolet radiation-induced pyrimidine dimers in neonatal BALB/c mouse skin. Cancer Res. 1981 May;41(5):1829–1833. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Applegate L. A., Ley R. D., Alcalay J., Kripke M. L. Identification of the molecular target for the suppression of contact hypersensitivity by ultraviolet radiation. J Exp Med. 1989 Oct 1;170(4):1117–1131. doi: 10.1084/jem.170.4.1117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bohr V. A., Okumoto D. S., Hanawalt P. C. Survival of UV-irradiated mammalian cells correlates with efficient DNA repair in an essential gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jun;83(11):3830–3833. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.11.3830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ceccoli J., Rosales N., Tsimis J., Yarosh D. B. Encapsulation of the UV-DNA repair enzyme T4 endonuclease V in liposomes and delivery to human cells. J Invest Dermatol. 1989 Aug;93(2):190–194. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12277569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Denkins Y., Fidler I. J., Kripke M. L. Exposure of mice to UV-B radiation suppresses delayed hypersensitivity to Candida albicans. Photochem Photobiol. 1989 May;49(5):615–619. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1989.tb08432.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Freeman S. E., Blackett A. D., Monteleone D. C., Setlow R. B., Sutherland B. M., Sutherland J. C. Quantitation of radiation-, chemical-, or enzyme-induced single strand breaks in nonradioactive DNA by alkaline gel electrophoresis: application to pyrimidine dimers. Anal Biochem. 1986 Oct;158(1):119–129. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(86)90599-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gordon L. K., Haseltine W. A. Comparison of the cleavage of pyrimidine dimers by the bacteriophage T4 and Micrococcus luteus UV-specific endonucleases. J Biol Chem. 1980 Dec 25;255(24):12047–12050. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harriott-Smith T. G., Halliday W. J. Suppression of contact hypersensitivity by short-term ultraviolet irradiation: II. The role of urocanic acid. Clin Exp Immunol. 1988 Apr;72(1):174–177. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kim T. Y., Kripke M. L., Ullrich S. E. Immunosuppression by factors released from UV-irradiated epidermal cells: selective effects on the generation of contact and delayed hypersensitivity after exposure to UVA or UVB radiation. J Invest Dermatol. 1990 Jan;94(1):26–32. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12873322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kripke M. L. Immunological unresponsiveness induced by ultraviolet radiation. Immunol Rev. 1984 Aug;80:87–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1984.tb00496.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kripke M. L., Morison W. L. Studies on the mechanism of systemic suppression of contact hypersensitivity by UVB radiation. II. Differences in the suppression of delayed and contact hypersensitivity in mice. J Invest Dermatol. 1986 May;86(5):543–549. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12355000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Luger T. A., Schwarz T. Evidence for an epidermal cytokine network. J Invest Dermatol. 1990 Dec;95(6 Suppl):100S–104S. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12874944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Norval M., Gilmour J. W., Simpson T. J. The effect of histamine receptor antagonists on immunosuppression induced by the cis-isomer of urocanic acid. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 1990 Dec;7(6):243–248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ross J. A., Howie S. E., Norval M., Maingay J. Two phenotypically distinct T cells are involved in ultraviolet-irradiated urocanic acid-induced suppression of the efferent delayed-type hypersensitivity response to herpes simplex virus, type 1 in vivo. J Invest Dermatol. 1987 Sep;89(3):230–233. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12470977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schwarz T., Urbanska A., Gschnait F., Luger T. A. Inhibition of the induction of contact hypersensitivity by a UV-mediated epidermal cytokine. J Invest Dermatol. 1986 Aug;87(2):289–291. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12696708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Thomas W. R., Edwards A. J., Watkins M. C., Asherson G. L. Distribution of immunogenic cells after painting with the contact sensitizers fluorescein isothiocyanate and oxazolone. Different sensitizers form immunogenic complexes with different cell populations. Immunology. 1980 Jan;39(1):21–27. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ullrich S. E., McIntyre B. W., Rivas J. M. Suppression of the immune response to alloantigen by factors released from ultraviolet-irradiated keratinocytes. J Immunol. 1990 Jul 15;145(2):489–498. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Yarosh D. B., Kibitel J. T., Green L. A., Spinowitz A. Enhanced unscheduled DNA synthesis in UV-irradiated human skin explants treated with T4N5 liposomes. J Invest Dermatol. 1991 Jul;97(1):147–150. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12479314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Yarosh D. B., Yee V. SKH-1 hairless mice repair UV-induced pyrimidine dimers in epidermal DNA. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1990 Nov;7(2-4):173–179. doi: 10.1016/1011-1344(90)85154-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES