Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Aug 5;6:30791. doi: 10.1038/srep30791

Large-area, continuous and high electrical performances of bilayer to few layers MoS2 fabricated by RF sputtering via post-deposition annealing method

Sajjad Hussain 1,2, Jai Singh 3, Dhanasekaran Vikraman 4, Arun Kumar Singh 5, Muhammad Zahir Iqbal 5,*, Muhammad Farooq Khan 5, Pushpendra Kumar 6, Dong-Chul Choi 1,2, Wooseok Song 7, Ki-Seok An 7, Jonghwa Eom 5, Wan-Gyu Lee 8,a, Jongwan Jung 1,2,b
PMCID: PMC4974610  PMID: 27492282

Abstract

We report a simple and mass-scalable approach for thin MoS2 films via RF sputtering combined with the post-deposition annealing process. We have prepared as-sputtered film using a MoS2 target in the sputtering system. The as-sputtered film was subjected to post-deposition annealing to improve crystalline quality at 700 °C in a sulfur and argon environment. The analysis confirmed the growth of continuous bilayer to few-layer MoS2 film. The mobility value of ~29 cm2/Vs and current on/off ratio on the order of ~104 were obtained for bilayer MoS2. The mobility increased up to ~173–181 cm2/Vs, respectively, for few-layer MoS2. The mobility of our bilayer MoS2 FETs is larger than any previously reported values of single to bilayer MoS2 grown on SiO2/Si substrate with a SiO2 gate oxide. Moreover, our few-layer MoS2 FETs exhibited the highest mobility value ever reported for any MoS2 FETs with a SiO2 gate oxide. It is presumed that the high mobility behavior of our film could be attributed to low charged impurities of our film and dielectric screening effect by an interfacial MoOxSiy layer. The combined preparation route of RF sputtering and post-deposition annealing process opens up the novel possibility of mass and batch production of MoS2 film.

Recently, MoS2 has attracted tremendous interest due to its film thickness scalability, its reducibility from bulk to a monolayer without surface dangling bonds or native oxides, and its promising carrier transport properties1,2. In contrast to graphene, which is intrinsically a semimetal with a zero band-gap, MoS2 is a semiconductor, which makes it a suitable substrate material for 2-dimensional (2D) field effect transistors (FETs)3,4. From an application point of view, a mass-producible growth technique for large-area, continuous, and high-quality MoS2 film on dielectrics is a pre-requisite. Micromechanical exfoliation method provides the purest MoS2 flakes with the highest material quality, the sample size is extremely limited2,5. Several attempts have performed by different groups to satisfy those needs for MoS2 film6. Many research groups also have reported promising growth route of CVD- MoS27,8,9. Sulfurization of molybdenum (Mo)10,11 and thermolysis of Mo compounds10,12 and (NH4)2MoS413 have attempted previously for preparation MoS2. MoO3 and MoCl5 along with sulfur are common precursors for MoS2-CVD14,15,16,17. Such methods usually yielded multilayer and suffered due to non-uniform film thickness and low carrier mobility10,14,15,18,19. Moreover, the synthesized continuous MoS2 films via the surface treatment exhibits very low carrier mobility (0.02–7 cm2/Vs)10,14,15,18,20. Continuous CVD-MoS2 films have been demonstrated using MoCl5 without pre-treatment, but the reported carrier mobility is also very low (0.003–0.03 cm2/Vs)18. Sanne et al.21 reported mobility value of 24 cm2/Vs and Ion/Ioff current ratio exceeding 107 for top-gated MoS2 FETs with high-k gate dielectric on Si3N4. Ma et al.22 demonstrated the vapor-solid growth of few-layer MoS2 films on (0001) oriented sapphire. They estimated room temperature mobility of 192 cm2/Vs from the space-charge limited transport regime of the film. Laskar et al.23 attained large-area MoS2 films on (0001) oriented sapphire using sulfurization of e-beam evaporated Mo. They reported field-effect mobility of ~12 cm2/Vs using Mott-Guirney law with the carrier density of 1016 cm−3. Still, the lack of pristine quality, and wafer-scale synthesis of continuous MoS2 film on SiO2 is a challenging issue to be addressed.

Recently, there are few attempts to revive the sputtering technique for the growth of thin MoS2 film24,25,26. However, the reported films are either relatively thick or the reported electrical and optical properties are rare and poor27,28,29. Muratore et al.27 and Qin et al.28 reported the synthesis of continuous few-layer MoS2 by sputtering method using a MoS2 target. Tao et al.30 reported MoS2 film using Mo target sputtered in vaporized sulfur ambient, but the grown MoS2 film also exhibited p-type behavior with hole mobility up to ~12.2 cm2/Vs and low on/off current ratio of ~103.

Herein, we report a simple and mass-scalable approach for thin MoS2 films via MoS2-RF sputtering combined with the post-deposition annealing process for the first time. From Raman spectra and photoluminescence (PL), it has been shown that the crystalline quality of the as-sputtered MoS2 films was highly enhanced through the post-deposition annealing process. Synthesized bilayer MoS2 films exhibited high field-effect mobility of ~29 cm2/Vs and a current on/off ratio of ~104. The mobility increased up to ~173–181 cm2/Vs, respectively, for few-layer MoS2 films. To the best of our knowledge, the mobility value of our bilayer MoS2 FETs is larger than any reported results of single to bilayer MoS2 FETs grown on SiO2/Si with a SiO2 gate oxide. Furthermore, the mobility value (~173–181 cm2/Vs) of our few-layer MoS2 FETs is the highest ever for any MoS2 FETs with a SiO2 gate oxide. It is much higher than that of single crystal exfoliated MoS2 flakes on SiO2/Si substrate31 and comparable to the value of bulk MoS2, room temperature mobility limited by phonon-scattering32.

Results and Discussion

MoS2 films of different thicknesses were deposited by adjusting RF magnetron sputtering time such as 1, 3, 5 and 15 min onto SiO2/Si, quartz and sapphire substrates. The substrate temperature was varied from RT to 500 °C. As-sputtered films were subjected to post-deposition annealing treatment at 700 °C in the sulfur and Ar environment to improve their crystallinity. The detailed scheme for preparation and annealing processes is illustrated in Fig. 1(a). Optical microcopy images of sulfurized MoS2 films at 1, 3 and 5 min. sputtered on SiO2/Si substrate are shown in Fig. 1b–d.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Schematic representation of the experimental set-up. The RF sputtering technique was used to prepare as-sputtered MoS2 layer. Post-deposition annealing treatment was performed to further enhance crystalline quality in as-sputtered MoS2 under Ar and sulfur environment. Optical images of MoS2 films grown on SiO2/Si substrate. (b) MoS2 sputtered for 1 min; (c) MoS2 sputtered for 3 min; and (d) MoS2 sputtered for 5 min.

Raman spectra of the as-sputtered MoS2 films are shown in Fig. 2a–c. The as-sputtered MoS2 films exhibit the E12g and A1g mode peaks with low intensity. It might be due to low crystalline quality and the presence of defects contributes to the broad and low intensity of the peaks. The strong substrate related peak is observed at 520 cm−1. As the sputter time increases, the Raman scattering peak intensities are slightly enhanced. Additional peaks at ~820 and ~992 cm−1 are related to the oxygen bonds and characteristic peaks of MoO3 (alpha(α)-MoO3)33. The symmetric stretch of 820 cm−1 (Ag, B1g) is a terminal Mo = O bond and the 995 cm−1 (Ag, B1g) is an asymmetric stretch of the terminal Mo = O bond along the a- and b-axes24,25,34. MoS2 films are highly sensitive to moisture and oxidize easily. It has been also proposed that conventional sputter-deposited MoS2 film contains oxygen substituted for sulfur atoms in the MoS2 crystal lattice during film growth26.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a–c) Raman spectra of as-sputtered and annealed MoS2 films; (d) Raman spectra of MoS2 films annealed at different times of 30 min, 1 hour, 2 hours and 3 hours; (e) Magnified view of Raman spectra of figure (d); (f–h) Raman mapping for 1-min sample (30 μm × 30 μm). (f) E2g1 mode appears at 384.82–384.92 cm−1 (with a standard deviation 0.048 cm−1) (g) A1g mode appears at 405.19–405.29 cm−1 (with a standard deviation 0.049 cm−1) (h) The measured frequencies difference (∆k) is in the range of 20.27–20.47 cm−1 (with a standard deviation 0.066 cm−1).

Figure 2a–c shows that Raman spectra variation through post-deposition annealing. The Raman peak enhancement indicates that the high-temperature annealing in the presence of sulfur and Ar greatly improved the crystallinity of as-sputtered MoS2 film. Moreover, MoO3-related peaks were significantly suppressed for the annealed MoS2 films. Through the post-deposition annealing in sulfur and Ar, the MoO3 is believed to be transformed into a crystalline MoS2 structure10,35. For the 1 min-sample (MoS2 sputtered for 1 min and annealed at 700 °C for 1 hour), the Raman peak difference between E12g and A1g mode is ~20.5 cm−1, which is close to that of the exfoliated bilayer MoS236. Figure 2d,e shows the Raman spectra according to the different annealing times from 30 min to 3 hours. The peak intensities are increased slightly with increase of annealing time. In order to focus oxygen-related peaks more precisely, the Raman analysis was performed for thick MoS2 films; as-sputtered films for 15 min at RT and 400 °C, and annealed MoS2 films (Figure S1). The thick film sputtered at RT exhibited strong MoO3 peaks at ~822 and ~992 cm−1 (Figure S1c,d). The oxygen peak intensities were reduced at higher substrate temperature (400 °C), but decreased most through the post-deposition annealing at 700 °C (the as-synthesized film was originally sputtered at RT). Raman mapping was performed over an area of 30 μm × 30 μm for 1 min-sample as shown in Fig. 2f–h. The E12g and A1g mode peaks appear at ~384.82–384.92 (with a standard deviation 0.048 cm−1) and ~405.19–405.29 cm−1 (with a standard deviation 0.049 cm−1), respectively. The peak difference (∆k) values are in the range of ~20.27–20.47 cm−1 (with a standard deviation 0.066 cm−1), corresponding to the MoS2 bilayer14,36. For the 3 min-sample (MoS2 sputtered for 3 min and annealed at 700 °C for 1 hour, Figure S2), E12g and A1g mode are located in the range of ~382.23–382.33 cm−1 (with a standard deviation 0.05 cm−1) and ~407.29–407.39 cm−1 (with a standard deviation 0.045 cm−1), respectively, with ∆k values in the range of ~24.96–25.16 cm−1 (with a standard deviation 0.066 cm−1), corresponding to few-layer MoS2 film36. For the 5 min-sample (MoS2 sputtered for 5 min and annealed at 700 °C for 1 hour), the E12g mode position downshifted to ~380.63–380.73 cm−1 (with a standard deviation 0.05 cm−1) and the A1g mode upshifted to ~408.29–408.39 cm−1 (with a standard deviation 0.047cm−1). The ∆k value is increased to ~27.56–27.76 cm−1 (with a standard deviation 0.070 cm−1), suggesting that film thickness increment. The Raman measurement was also performed for as-synthesized MoS2 sputtered at various substrate temperatures from 200 to 500 °C (Figure S3). The as-sputtered film at a substrate temperature of 200 °C exhibits two characteristic MoS2 Raman peaks with low intensity (E12g mode at ~381 cm−1 and A1g mode at ~411 cm−1). At higher substrate temperatures of 300, 400 and 500 °C, the Raman peak intensities are slightly varied and MoO3 peaks at ~822 and ~993 cm−1 are reduced. XRD was performed to investigate the structural properties of MoS2 film. XRD patterns of as-sputtered MoS2 thin films and the corresponding annealed films are shown in Figure S4a–c. For as-sputtered films, only a silicon substrate-related peak at 2θ = 33° is observed, supporting the amorphous structure of RT-sputtered MoS2 film. However, (002) lattice oriented diffraction line is observed at 2θ = 14.2° for annealed MoS2 films. The strong (002) peak is present when the periodicity in c-axis is normal to the MoS2 film plane which is in good agreement with the previous results37,38. As-sputtered MoS2 films sputtered at higher substrate temperatures revealed a very weak (002) peak and intensity tends to increase with the increase of sputtering temperature from 200 °C to 500 °C(Figure S5). Thus, Raman and XRD analysis revealed that increase of sputtering temperature improves the film quality and reduces oxygen content but is not sufficient for obtaining high quality MoS2 film; post-deposition annealing improves film quality the most.

XPS analysis was used to measure binding energies of Mo and S atom. For the 1 min-sample, Mo 3d peaks at 229.1 and 232.2 eV are exhibited (Fig. 3a), which is attributed to the doublet of Mo 3d5/2 and Mo 3d3/2, respectively39. Also sulfur atoms-related 2S pathetic peak is observed at 226.3 eV. S2− peaks are also observed (Fig. 3b) at 161.9 and 163.1 eV due to S 2p1/2 and S 2p3/2, respectively. In addition, a peak at 235.9 eV corresponds to the Mo6+ of MoO340. For the 3 min and 5 min-sample, the observed peaks are slightly shifted to lower binding energies, which may be due to the increment of the number of layers. All these results are in good agreement with the reported values for MoS2 crystal41. The intensity of Mo6+ peaks decreased with increasing growth time. The Mo6+ peaks indicate that some oxygen is incorporated in the grown MoS2 film. Oxygen can be incorporated as substitutional atoms at sulfur sites42, as atoms bound to Mo atoms at plane edges26, as an intercalant between basal planes as O2 or moisture (H2O)43, or as an interfacial Mo-oxide layer due to Mo-oxygen bonding at the MoS2-SiO2 interface27,28. XPS survey spectra of Figure S7 show that the total oxygen and silicon signal decreases with increasing sputtering time. This could be explained as the probability of electrons escaping from the SiO2 substrate reduces exponentially with increasing MoS2 thickness31.

Figure 3. XPS spectra of MoS2 films annealed at 700 °C.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Mo and S atoms binding energy spectra for different sputter time: (a,b) 1 min, (c,d) 3 min, and (e,f) 5 min.

XPS depth profile analysis was performed to investigate the interfacial structure of the MoS2/SiO2 film. A 1keV Ar ion beam was used for sputtering purpose. XPS survey spectra depict that increment of oxygen peak as well as decrement of Mo core level peak with the increase of etching time (Figure S8c). The expanded view of Mo 3d core peak variations are displayed in the Fig. 4a as a function of etching time. Before the sputter etching, the peaks of Mo4+ 3d states are the main part of the spectra, and a small amount of MoO3 state exists on the surface. When the film is etched by ion beam, there is a chemical shift of its binding energy toward smaller values. The shift is attributed to the change in the chemical states of Mo4+ from the film surface to inner44. The Mo6+ peak of MoO3 is highly suppressed after etching for 10 sec. So, the Mo6+ peaks are mainly originated from the surface oxidation of MoS2. The peak shift proceeds until 60 sec. After 60 sec, the binding energy shifts back toward higher values. From the Fig. 4b, sulphur related S2− peaks are decreased and broadened as etching proceeds due to the damage induced by Ar etching, and the peaks almost disappear after etching for 50~60 sec (Fig. 4b, Figure S8c, Supporting Information). On the contrary, Mo peaks still exist after 60 sec. Hence, it is highly likely that these Mo could be combined with oxygen atoms or Si atoms in SiO2 and form as a molybdenum oxide (MoOx), or molybdenum silicon oxide (MoOxSiy) layer. The Si 2p peak in Fig. 4d is exhibited at ~102 eV before Ar etching, and it upshifts towards ~103.2 eV, which is the binding energy of SiO2. It is suspected that the Si 2p peak at ~102 eV is due to the MoOx-SiOx bonding45. The Si 2p binding energy at ~102 eV is very close to that of (MoO3)70(SiO)30 (102.5eV)45.

Figure 4. XPS Depth profile of few-layer MoS2 (5 min-sample).

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) Mo 3d core peaks as a function of etching time. Binding energies at 229.1 and 232.2 eV are associated with Mo4+ 3d5/2 and 3d3/2 core levels in MoS2, respectively, while S 2s appears at 226.3 eV. The peak at 235.9 eV indicates the presence of Mo6+ (MoO3) on the surface of the film. (b) Sulfur related S2− peak change with etching time. The sulfur related peaks are eventually disappeared after 50~60 sec. (c,d) O 1s and S 2p peak depth profile with the etching time.

We later discuss that the interfacial layer can alter the electrical properties of MoS2 film. The XPS depth profiling was also performed for a very thick MoS2 film (Figure S8) and observed results are also similar to few-layer MoS2.

Figure 5a,b shows the cross-sectional high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) image and the corresponding electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) spectra for 5 min-sample. For the position 1 and position 2, ‘Si’ and ‘SiO2’ are detected at ~99 eV and ~105 eV, respectively, and ‘O’ is detected at ~525 eV. Therefore these two points are clearly SiO2. A sulfur is detected at ~160 eV from the region 3 and 4, and not from the position 1, 2 and 5, indicating that point 3 and 4 are MoS2. It is thought that position 2 looks bright due to higher scattering of Mo. The position 5 is an epoxy material exhibiting only C spectrum. The comparison of bright field and HAADF image (Fig. 5c,d) indicates that the region 2 is an interfacial layer of the MoS2/SiO2. It is suspected that during sputtering process, Mo adlayers are initially formed at the interface of MoS2/SiO2 and the Mo layers diffused into SiO2 during the annealing step, resulting in the formation of MoOxSiy layer. The diffused interfacial layer appears brighter due to higher scattering with heavier atoms in that region than that in pure SiO2 film.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(a) HAADF image for few-layer MoS2 film (5min-sample) (b) EELS spectra evaluated at different depth positions of film which is labelled as 1,2,3,4 and 5 (c) HRTEM and (d) STEM-HAADF image.

Luminescence properties were studied by PL analysis as shown in Figure S10. The PL peaks are very weak and broad for the as-sputtered films. As sputtering time increases, peak position is shifted to a higher wavelength since the film thickness increases46,47. The luminescence peak intensities are significantly increased for the annealed MoS2 films (Figure S10b). For the 1 min-sample, the major peak is located at ~662 nm (1.87 eV, A peak) and one minor peak at ~620 nm (2 eV, B peak), which corresponds to a direct excitonic transition at the K point of the Brillouin zone of MoS2. The energy difference (~0.13 eV) is due to the degeneracy breaking of the valence band, which is in a close agreement with the literature48,49. The measured FWHM value for direct transition of peak A is ~67 meV, which is similar to freely suspended samples of MoS2 (50–60 meV)50 and narrower than that of MoS2 exfoliated onto SiO2 (100~150 meV)51. The emission intensity gradually increases with red shift52,53 as increase of annealing time as shown in Figure S10c. This strong luminescence behavior is due to bilayer MoS2 with a highly crystalline structure and support our earlier observation by Raman and XRD analysis that crystalline quality improvement via annealing at 700 °C.

The thickness of the film was analyzed by AFM as shown in Fig. 6a–c. AFM scan was taken at a corner of the MoS2 film patterned using photolithography and etching process. For the 1 min-sample, the estimated thickness is ~1.4 nm, which is approximately close to bilayer MoS218,36 (Fig. 6a). The thickness is ~3.8 nm (~5–6 layers) and ~6 nm (~8–10 layers), for the 3 min and 5 min-samples, respectively. Film continuity and uniformity were explored by AFM topographical 2D images. The surface roughness (Ra, average deviation) values over a scanned area of 5 μm × 5 μm are ~0.18 nm, 0.22 nm, ~0.19 nm for 1, 3, and 5 min as-sputtered MoS2 films, respectively (Figure S11). 2D topographical images of the annealed films are shown in Fig. 6(d–f). The surface roughness (Ra) values are ~0.25 nm, ~0.35 nm, and ~0.29 nm for 1, 3, and 5 min-sample, respectively. These low roughness values support the highly uniform and continuous MoS2 films. We believe that a wafer-scale MoS2 could be produced by optimizing the sputtering time and annealing process.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

(a–c) AFM height profiles of annealed MoS2 films sputtered at 1, 3, and 5 min. Inset figure: 2D cross sectional images of the corresponding annealed MoS2 films; (d–f) Topographical images of annealed MoS2 films sputtered at 1, 3, and 5 min.

HRTEM analysis was performed to explore the crystalline structure of MoS2 film (1 min-sample) as shown in Fig. 7. The lower magnification-HRTEM images are exhibited in Fig. 7a,b for a continuous MoS2 film on the copper grid. Figure S12a shows the HRTEM image over an area of 39 nm × 30 nm for 1 min-sample. The film shows a continuous film with a hexagonal lattice structure. Several types of Moiré fringes are observed and the film consists of mainly bilayer. The observed Moiré fringes in unfolded areas indicate that layers are not Bernal-stacked. A typical Moiré fringes (type B) in Figure S12 were analyzed using fast Fourier transformation (FFT) in Fig. 7d. The exhibited two inverse FFT images (Fig. 7e,f) are extracted from Figure 7c, showing that the two layers are rotated by ~26°. Figure 7g shows a different Moiré pattern (type A in Figure S12) consisting of two layers stacked in a low rotation angle, and the corresponding FFT image is shown in Fig. 7h. The continuous and uniform surface homogeneity was confirmed by FESEM images for 1, 3 and 5-min MoS2 samples as shown in Fig. 7(i–k), respectively. A monolayer is also spotted in Figure S12 (type C). Figure S12b,c shows HRTEM images for the 3 min and 5 min-sample as a supporting information. Large area MoS2 films with ~1 × 9 cm2 area and its Raman spectra are shown in Figure S13.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

HRTEM images of 1 min-sample. (a,b) Low-magnification TEM image; (c) Moiré pattern of a bilayer-MoS2 area; (d) Fast Fourier transformation (FFT) image corresponding to the TEM image (c) supporting a bilayer MoS2 film; (e,f) Inverse FFT images of (d) showing the two layers are not Bernal-stacked, but rotated by ~26o; (g) Moiré pattern of a region in which two layers are stacked in a low rotation angle; (h) FFT image corresponding to the TEM image (g); (i–k) FE-SEM images of annealed MoS2 films sputtered at 1, 3, and 5 min.

We have fabricated MoS2 FETs and performed I–V measurement to investigate electrical properties. The schematic diagram of MoS2 FET structure is given in Figure S15a. The active areas of FETs were defined during the sputtering process using a metal-shadow mask. As-sputtered MoS2 film exhibited very high resistance in the range between 16 GΩ and 0.2 GΩ. Id–Vg and Id–Vd plots of these devices are presented in Figure S14a–f. Our previous results showed that as-sputtered MoS2 at RT are amorphous structure and are oxidized. As a result, as-sputtered film can exhibit in high channel resistance and low current and mobility54,55. Figure 8a shows that Id–Vd curves of the 1 min-sample with respect to the back-gate voltages. Figure 8b shows the transfer characteristics of the annealed bilayer MoS2 FET (1 min-sample). The field-effect mobility was extracted based on the slope of ΔId/ΔVg fitted to the linear regime of the transfer curves using the following equation:

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

(a) Id–Vd of MoS2 FET of 1-min sample; (b) Id–Vg of MoS2 FET (1 min-sample) at Vd = 1, 3, 4 and 5 V; (c,d) Id–Vg of MoS2 FETs, 3 min-sample (c), and 5 min-sample (d) at fixed Vd = 1V.

graphic file with name srep30791-m1.jpg

where W is the width of the channel (200 μm) L is the length of the channel (2300 μm), Cox is the capacitance per unit area of the gate dielectric (1.15 × 10−8 F/cm2), Vd is the applied drain voltage (Vd = 1 V), and ΔId/ΔVg is the slope of the linear part of the transfer plot (Id–Vg), or transconductance. The extracted transconductance, field-effect mobility, and on/off current ratio is ~2.9 × 10−8 S, 29 cm2/Vs and ~104, respectively, at Vd = 1V. The linear drain current and the transconductance values at Vd = 1V are displayed in the Figure S15b. The transfer characteristics and Id–Vd curves for few-layer MoS2 FETs (3 and 5 min-sample) are shown in Figure S15c,d. The extracted transconductance values are ~1.81 × 10−7 S and ~1.73 × 10−7 S for the 3 min and 5 min-sample, respectively, which are ~6 times greater than bilayer MoS2 (1 min-sample). The current on/off ratio values are ~2 × 103 −4 × 104 for few-layer MoS2 FETs. The extracted field-effect mobility is ~181and ~173 cm2/Vs for 3 min-sample and 5 min-sample, respectively.

Table 1 compares field-effect mobility and Ion/Ioff values of our results with previously reported MoS2 FETs. A significant enhancement can be noted in our MoS2 FETs. It is interesting to compare with the recent reported mobility of ~12 cm2/Vs for thin MoS2 film, but the mobility decreased significantly to ~0.44 cm2/Vs for ~6.4 nm-MoS2 due to the incomplete transition of MoS2 from Mo29. To the best of our knowledge, our bilayer MoS2 FETs have higher mobility than any of latest results: exfoliated monolayer MoS2 FETs of 0.1–10 cm2/Vs, 10–15 cm2/Vs for exfoliated bilayer MoS22, and ~17 cm2/Vs for CVD-grown single crystal bilayer MoS256. It should be noted that some reports exhibiting very high mobility values for MoS2 film in Table 1 is due to the substrate effect such as sapphire or high-k gate oxide effect.

Table 1. Literature values of room temperature field-effect mobility for MoS2 FETs grown by various methods.

S. No. Growth method Ion/Ioff Mobility [cm2/Vs] Ref.
1 Sputtering (MoS2) + CVD ~104 ~29 (~1.4 nm) ~173–181 (~3.8~6 nm) This work
2 CVD (MoO3 + S) ~107 24 Appl.Phys. Lett., 106 (2015) 062101
3 Sputtering (MoS2) ~103 12.2 Nanoscale, 2015,7, 2497–2503
4 MoO3 powder + Mo substrate+ CVD   192 Appl. Phys. Lett., 105 (2014) 072105
5 Ebeam (Mo) + CVD   12±2 Appl. Phys. Lett., 102 (2013) 252108.
6 Sputtering (Mo)+ CVD ~1.5 × 106 ~5 × 104 12 (~1.1 nm) 0.44 (~6.4 nm) ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6 (23), 21215–21222
7 CVD (MoCl5 + S) ~104~105 0.003–0.03 Scientific Reports 3 : 1866 DOI: 10.1038/srep01866
8 CVD (MoO3 + S) on rGO ~104 0.02 Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 2320–2325
9 CVD (MoO3 + S) ~106 2~7 ACS Nano, 2014, 8 (6), 6024–6030
10 Ebeam (Mo) + CVD   0.004~0.04 Small 2012, 8, 966.
11 CVD (MoO3 + S) ~108 17 Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 123104 (2012)
12 CVD (MoO3 + S) ~104 ~106 0.1~0.7 J. Amer. Chem. Society 2013, 135, 5304.
13 CVD (MoO3 + S) ~103 0.09 Nano Research 2014, 7 (12) : 1759–1768
14 Thermal (MoO3)+ CVD on sapphire ~105 ~0.8 Nanoscale, 2012,4, 6637–6641
15 Thermolysis of (NH4)2MoS4 ~105 4.7~6 Nano Lett., 2012, 12 (3), 1538–1544
16 Exfoliated (electrochemical) ~106 1.2 ACS Nano, 2014, 8 (7), 6902–6910
17 CVD (H2S +Mo) ~105 0.12 Nanoscale, 2014,6, 2821–2826
18 Mo(CO)6 + (C2H5)2S ~104 30 Nature, 2015, 520, 656–660
19 CVD (MoO3 + S) ~106 3.6 (1L), 8.2 (2L), 15.6 (3L) Nanoscale, 2015,7, 1688–1695
20 CVD(MoO3 + S) 105~107 ~3 to 4 Nat. Mater., 2013, 12, 554–561.
Open in a new tab

Besides, the mobility (173–181 cm2/Vs) of our few-layer MoS2 is the highest value ever for any MoS2 FETs with SiO2 gate dielectrics. Ayari et al.31 reported 10~50 cm2/Vs of mobility from single crystal exfoliated MoS2 flakes with 8~40 nm thickness. Our sputtered-MoS2 films have small grain sizes, which are smaller compared with an exfoliated MoS2. An important question then remains, what could be the possible mechanism for the high mobility behavior of our MoS2 film? For current 2D crystal materials, electron mobility is mostly dominated by charged impurity scattering, and the mobility values achieved to date are far below the intrinsic potential in these materials52.

We think that the high mobility behavior of our film could be attributed to low charged impurities of our film and dielectric screening effect by the interfacial MoOxSiy layer. In our process, MoS2 films were directly sputtered on SiO2/Si substrate at high vacuum and transistors were fabricated without transfer step, while the conventional CVD-grown MoS2, except exfoliated MoS2, usually needs the wet-transfer process onto a desired dielectric substrate and it make high contamination. Since sputtering process is performed in a high vacuum chamber, the chemical residues and gaseous adsorbates could be minimized. In addition, the dielectric surface dangling bonds could be also minimized due to a strong interaction of Mo and O on SiO2 of the interfacial layer. Thus, low charged impurities could reduce the Coulomb scattering, resulting in high mobility values in the sputtered-MoS253.

It is also well known that a bulk α-MoO3 possesses very high relative dielectric constants (>500 for α-MoO3)57. And the dielectric constants of an atomically thin α-MoO3 is still high even though it is low compared with its bulk value58. Thus, the MoOxSiy could reduce Coulomb scattering effects due to its high-k value as well as low dielectric dangling bonds. We have also prepared MoO3 film on SiO2/Si substrate via a reactive sputtering using Mo target. XPS data of the sulfurized MoS2 from Mo target also have the MoO3 peak similar to the previous results (Figure S16). The as-sputtered MoO3 exhibited very high resistance due to a wide bandgap of the material. On the other hand, the sulfurized few-layer MoS2 FETs (from MoO3) exhibited high mobility values (~44 cm2/Vs) (Figure S17). This experiment also supports our hypothesis. The fact that few-layer MoS2 has much higher mobility value than that of bilayer MoS2 reflects a critical role of Coulomb interaction distance upon the mobility values since thicker film has longer interaction distance. We compared hysteresis in transfer curves of FETs made by exfoliated-MoS2, CVD-grown MoS2, and sputtered-MoS2 (Figures S18 and S19). It is well known that the origin of hysteresis of conventional FETs is due to the trapping and detrapping of carriers59. The trapping and detrapping can occur at the interface of the MoS2/SiO2 or at the top surface of MoS2. Imperfect interface between MoS2 and SiO2 such as foreign molecules trapped at the interface or dielectric dangling bonds could contribute to the interface trap of MoS2/SiO2. Chemical residues or moisture or oxygen on the MoS2 surface could contribute the charge trapping at the top surface of MoS2 film. Water and oxygen in ambient environment also have been reported to cause hysteresis of MoS2 FETs due to the charge transferring on MoS2 top surface59.

We compared the hysteresis under vacuum environment to prevent such extrinsic and environmental effects and focus on the trapping at the MoS2/SiO2 interface60. The exfoliated-MoS2 and CVD-grown MoS2 exhibited large hysteresis in there Id–Vg curves. On the contrary, the sputtered-MoS2 film exhibited small hysteresis. Such improvement in the hysteresis can be attributed to the small trap at the MoS2/SiO2 interface of the sputtered-MoS2 film. It is thought that charge scattering due to charge trapping is reduced due to the interfacial layer and enhance the mobility behavior of our sputtered-MoS2 film.

Conclusions

We have successfully demonstrated the growth of large-area and continuous bilayer to few-layer MoS2 on SiO2/Si substrate via RF sputtering combined with the post-deposition annealing process. The crystalline quality of the as-sputtered films was substantially improved via annealing at 700 °C in the sulfur and argon environment. The bilayer MoS2 FETs exhibited a high field-effect mobility of ~29 cm2/Vs and an on/off ratio of ~104. The mobility value of our bilayer MoS2 FETs is larger than any of latest results of single to bilayer MoS2 grown on a SiO2/Si substrate with a SiO2 gate oxide. The mobility for few-layer MoS2 FETs increased to ~173–181 cm2/Vs. Our few-layer MoS2 FETs exhibited the highest mobility value ever for any MoS2 FETs with a SiO2 gate oxide. It is presumed that the high mobility behavior of our film could be attributed to low charged impurities of our film and dielectric screening effect by the interfacial MoOxSiy layer. The combined synthesis route of MoS2-RF sputtering with the post-deposition annealing process could open up the possibility of mass and batch production of MoS2 film. We believe our proposed strategy will pave the way for applications of MoS2 in future electronics and optoelectronics.

Method

The various sizes of SiO2 (300 nm)/Si substrates ranging from 1 × 1 cm2 to 3 × 3 cm2 were used for the film preparation process. All the substrates were cleaned in acetone, methanol, isopropyl alcohol (IPA) solution and deionized (DI) water and then dried and baked for 5 min. After loading the SiO2/Si substrates into a sputtering chamber, the chamber was vacuumed at 1 × 10−6 Torr. Before the deposition process, the MoS2 target (99.99% purity) was pre-sputtered in a pure argon (Ar) atmosphere for 5 min in order to remove the oxide layer on the surface of the target. The MoS2 films were sputtered at various temperatures: RT, 200, 300, 400 and 500 °C. The chamber pressure was maintained at 10 mTorr during the deposition in an Ar atmosphere, and the RF power was kept constant at 25 W for 1 min. The temperature variation in the chamber was monitored through a thermocouple. The as-sputtered MoS2 films were post-annealed at 700 °C under Ar and sulfur environment to improve the crystalline quality of the films. The as-deposited films were placed in an annealing chamber and heated up to 700 °C for 30 min, 1 hour, 2 hours, and 3 hours. The carrier gas flow rate was maintained at 100 sccm, and the pressure of chamber was kept at 2 × 10−2 Torr.

Fabrication of the MoS2 FET devices

The active area of MoS2 FET was formed during sputtering using a shadow mask. This kind of shadow mask is to avoid any chemical contamination by traditional active area preparation route of photolithography or electron-beam lithography. The metal contacts of 6 nm-Ti/30 nm-Au were prepared by evaporation. After making the electrode contacts, the devices were annealed at 200 °C for 2 hour in a vacuum tube furnace with 100 sccm Ar flow. After the annealing, the resistance of devices decreased significantly. The electrical properties of the fabricated MoS2 transistors were measured using the 2 probe method at room temperature in a vacuum chamber to avoid oxidation.

Characterization details of MoS2 films

Synthesized MoS2 films were analyzed by Raman spectroscopy (Renishaw invia RE04, 512 nm Ar laser) with a spot size of 1 μm and a scan speed of 30 seconds. A Si substrate with a Raman peak of 520 cm−1 was used for calibration. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (PHI 5000 Versa Probe, 25W Al Kα, 6.7 × 10−8 Pa) and photoluminescense (PL) with a 512 nm wavelength was used. Laser radiation of PL was focused onto the MoS2 film with a spot-size of around 1 μm. FE-SEM (HITACHI S-4700) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) (Vecco Dimension 3100) were used to check the morphology and thickness of the films. TEM samples were prepared using lacey-carbon Cu grid. The atomic structure of MoS2 thin films was characterized by a JEOL-2010F TEM with an accelerating voltage of 200 keV. Image acquisition and processing (FFT, IFFT, etc.) were performed using the Gatan Digital Micrograph software (Gatan Microscopy Suite 2.0). The crystallinity of the film was characterized by in-plan X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku) with Cu-Kα radiation operated at 50 KV and 300 mA.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Hussain, S. et al. Large-area, continuous and high electrical performances of bilayer to few layers MoS2 fabricated by RF sputtering via post-deposition annealing method. Sci. Rep. 6, 30791; doi: 10.1038/srep30791 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep30791-s1.doc (8.4MB, doc)

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program and Nano·Material Technology Development Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education (2010-0020207) and by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (NRF-2015M3A7B7045194), and by MOTIE (Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (10052928) and KSRC (Korea Semiconductor Research Consortium) support program for the development of the future semiconductor device. W. Song and K.-S. An were supported by a grant (2011-0031636) from the Center for Advanced Soft Electronics under the Global Frontier Research Program of the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning, Korea.

Footnotes

Author Contributions S.H. and J.S. initiated the study, performed the extensive experiments and wrote the paper with assistance from the co-authors. D.V. and D.-C.C. analyzed the data. A.K.S., M.Z.I. and M.F.K. help us in electrical transport properties. P.K. did us PL measurement. WS and K.-S.A. performed XPS and XPS depth profile analyses. J.E., W.-G.L. and J.J. Participation included planning, experimental work and discussion. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Radisavljevic B., Radenovic A., Brivio J., Giacometti V. & Kis A. Single-layer MoS2 transistors. Nature nanotechnology 6, 147–150 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Wang H. et al. Integrated circuits based on bilayer MoS2 transistors. Nano letters 12, 4674–4680 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lee H.-J., Kim E., Yook J.-G. & Jung J. Intrinsic characteristics of transmission line of graphenes at microwave frequencies. Applied Physics Letters 100, 223102 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  4. Roy K. et al. Graphene-MoS2 hybrid structures for multifunctional photoresponsive memory devices. Nat Nanotechnol 8, 826–830 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bao W., Cai X., Kim D., Sridhara K. & Fuhrer M. S. High mobility ambipolar MoS2 field-effect transistors: Substrate and dielectric effects. Applied Physics Letters 102, 042104 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  6. Salvatore G. A. et al. Fabrication and transfer of flexible few-layers MoS2 thin film transistors to any arbitrary substrate. ACS nano 7, 8809–8815 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Shi Y. et al. Van der Waals epitaxy of MoS2 layers using graphene as growth templates. Nano letters 12, 2784–2791 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ma X. & Shi M. Thermal Evaporation Deposition of Few-layer MoS2 Films. Nano-Micro Letters 5 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  9. Parilla P. A. et al. Formation of nanooctahedra in molybdenum disulfide and molybdenum diselenide using pulsed laser vaporization. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 108, 6197–6207 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhan Y., Liu Z., Najmaei S., Ajayan P. M. & Lou J. Large‐area vapor‐phase growth and characterization of MoS2 atomic layers on a SiO2 substrate. Small 8, 966–971 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee Y. et al. Synthesis of wafer-scale uniform molybdenum disulfide films with control over the layer number using a gas phase sulfur precursor. Nanoscale 6, 2821–2826 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cheon J., Gozum J. E. & Girolami G. S. Chemical Vapor Deposition of MoS2 and TiS2 Films From the Metal-Organic Precursors Mo(S-t-Bu)4 and Ti (S-t-Bu)4. Chemistry of Materials 9, 1847–1853 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu K.-K. et al. Growth of large-area and highly crystalline MoS2 thin layers on insulating substrates. Nano letters 12, 1538–1544 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lee Y. H. et al. Synthesis of Large‐Area MoS2 Atomic Layers with Chemical Vapor Deposition. Advanced Materials 24, 2320–2325 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee Y.-H. et al. Synthesis and transfer of single-layer transition metal disulfides on diverse surfaces. Nano letters 13, 1852–1857 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lin Y.-C. et al. Wafer-scale MoS2 thin layers prepared by MoO3 sulfurization. Nanoscale 4, 6637–6641 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang X., Feng H., Wu Y. & Jiao L. Controlled synthesis of highly crystalline MoS2 flakes by chemical vapor deposition. Journal of the American Chemical Society 135, 5304–5307 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Yu Y., Li C., Liu Y., Su L., Zhang Y. & Cao L. Controlled scalable synthesis of uniform, high-quality monolayer and few-layer MoS2 films. Scientific reports 3 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jeon J. et al. Layer-controlled CVD growth of large-area two-dimensional MoS2 films. Nanoscale 7, 1688–1695 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang J. et al. Scalable Growth of High-Quality Polycrystalline MoS2-Monolayers on SiO2 with Tunable Grain Sizes. ACS nano, 8, 6024–6030 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sanne A. et al. Top-gated chemical vapor deposited MoS2 field-effect transistors on Si3N4 substrates. Applied Physics Letters 106, 062101 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  22. Ma L. et al. Epitaxial growth of large area single-crystalline few-layer MoS2 with high space charge mobility of 192 cm2 V−1 s−1. Applied Physics Letters 105, 072105 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  23. Laskar M. R. et al. Large area single crystal (0001) oriented MoS2. Applied Physics Letters 102, 252108 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  24. Windom B. C., Sawyer W. & Hahn D. W. A Raman spectroscopic study of MoS2 and MoO3: applications to tribological systems. Tribology Letters 42, 301–310 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  25. Py M., Schmid P. E. & Vallin J. Raman scattering and structural properties of MoO3. Il Nuovo Cimento B Series 11 38, 271–279 (1977). [Google Scholar]
  26. Fleischauer P. D. & Lince J. R. A comparison of oxidation and oxygen substitution in MoS2 solid film lubricants. Tribology international 32, 627–636 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  27. Muratore C. et al. Continuous ultra-thin MoS2 films grown by low-temperature physical vapor deposition. Applied Physics Letters 104, 261604 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  28. Qin P. et al. In situ growth of double-layer MoO3/MoS2 film from MoS2 for hole-transport layers in organic solar cell. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2, 2742–2756 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  29. Choudhary N., Park J., Hwang J. Y. & Choi W. Growth of Large-Scale and Thickness-Modulated MoS2 Nanosheets. ACS applied materials & interfaces 6, 21215–21222 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tao J. et al. Growth of wafer-scale MoS2 monolayer by magnetron sputtering. Nanoscale 7, 2497–2503 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ayari A., Cobas E., Ogundadegbe O. & Fuhrer M. S. Realization and electrical characterization of ultrathin crystals of layered transition-metal dichalcogenides. Journal of applied physics 101, 014507-014507-014505 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  32. Fivaz R. & Mooser E. Mobility of charge carriers in semiconducting layer structures. Physical Review 163, 743 (1967). [Google Scholar]
  33. Yao D. D., Ou J. Z., Latham K., Zhuiykov S., O’Mullane A. P. & Kalantar-zadeh K. Electrodeposited α-and β-phase MoO3 films and investigation of their gasochromic properties. Crystal Growth & Design 12, 1865–1870 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  34. Hofmann M., Shin Y. C., Hsieh Y.-P., Dresselhaus M. S. & Kong J. A facile tool for the characterization of two-dimensional materials grown by chemical vapor deposition. Nano Research 5, 504–511 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  35. Balendhran S. et al. Atomically thin layers of MoS2 via a two step thermal evaporation–exfoliation method. Nanoscale 4, 461–466 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Li H. et al. From bulk to monolayer MoS2: evolution of Raman scattering. Advanced Functional Materials 22, 1385–1390 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  37. Ajit K. Thermal anisotropy in nano-crystalline MoS2 thin films. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 16, 1008–1014 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhu Y. Q. et al. Shock-absorbing and failure mechanisms of WS2 and MoS2 nanoparticles with fullerene-like structures under shock wave pressure. Journal of the American Chemical Society 127, 16263–16272 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Song I., Park C., Hong M., Baik J., Shin H. J. & Choi H. C. Patternable Large-Scale Molybdenium Disulfide Atomic Layers Grown by Gold-Assisted Chemical Vapor Deposition. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 53, 1266–1269 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Park W. et al. Photoelectron spectroscopic imaging and device applications of large-area patternable single-layer MoS2 synthesized by chemical vapor deposition. ACS nano 8, 4961–4968 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Altavilla C., Sarno M. & Ciambelli P. A Novel Wet Chemistry Approach for the Synthesis of Hybrid 2D Free-Floating Single or Multilayer Nanosheets of MS2@ oleylamine (M=Mo, W). Chemistry of Materials 23, 3879–3885 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  42. Lince J. R., Hilton M. R. & Bommannavar A. S. Oxygen substitution in sputter-deposited MoS2 films studied by extended X-ray absorption fine structure, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. Surface and Coatings Technology 43, 640–651 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhao X. & Perry S. S. The role of water in modifying friction within MoS2 sliding interfaces. ACS applied materials & interfaces 2, 1444–1448 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Gao X. et al. Changes in the composition, structure and friction property of sputtered MoS2 films by LEO environment exposure. Applied surface science 330, 30–38 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  45. Anwar M., Hogarth C., Bulpett R. & An X. P. S. study of amorphous MoO3/SiO films deposited by co-evaporation. Journal of Materials Science 25, 1784–1788 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  46. Coehoorn R., Haas C., Dijkstra J., Flipse C., De Groot R. & Wold A. Electronic structure of MoSe2, MoS2, and WSe2. I. Band-structure calculations and photoelectron spectroscopy. Physical Review B 35, 6195 (1987). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Eda G., Yamaguchi H., Voiry D., Fujita T., Chen M. & Chhowalla M. Photoluminescence from chemically exfoliated MoS2. Nano letters 11, 5111–5116 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Splendiani A. et al. Emerging photoluminescence in monolayer MoS2. Nano letters 10, 1271–1275 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Frey G., Elani S., Homyonfer M., Feldman Y. & Tenne R. Optical-absorption spectra of inorganic fullerenelike M S 2 (M=Mo, W). Physical Review B 57, 6666 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  50. Senthilkumar V., Tam L. C., Kim Y. S., Sim Y., Seong M.-J. & Jang J. I. Direct vapor phase growth process and robust photoluminescence properties of large area MoS2 layers. Nano Research 7, 1759–1768 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  51. Mak K. F., Lee C., Hone J., Shan J. & Heinz T. F. Atomically thin MoS 2: a new direct-gap semiconductor. Physical Review Letters 105, 136805 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Ma N. & Jena D. Charge scattering and mobility in atomically thin semiconductors. Physical Review X 4, 011043 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  53. Li S.-L. et al. Thickness-dependent interfacial coulomb scattering in atomically thin field-effect transistors. Nano letters 13, 3546–3552 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Qiu H., Pan L., Yao Z., Li J., Shi Y. & Wang X. Electrical characterization of back-gated bi-layer MoS2 field-effect transistors and the effect of ambient on their performances. Applied Physics Letters 100, 123104 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  55. Park W. et al. Oxygen environmental and passivation effects on molybdenum disulfide field effect transistors. Nanotechnology 24, 095202 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wu W. et al. High mobility and high on/off ratio field-effect transistors based on chemical vapor deposited single-crystal MoS2 grains. Applied Physics Letters 102, 142106 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  57. Saad E. Dielectric properties of molybdenum oxide thin films. Journal of optoelectronics and Advanced Materials 7, 2743–2752 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  58. Balendhran S. et al. Enhanced charge carrier mobility in two-dimensional high dielectric molybdenum oxide. Advanced Materials 25, 109–114 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Late D. J., Liu B., Matte H. R., Dravid V. P. & Rao C. Hysteresis in single-layer MoS2 field effect transistors. ACS nano 6, 5635–5641 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Guo Y. et al. Charge trapping at the MoS2-SiO2 interface and its effects on the characteristics of MoS2 metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistors. Applied Physics Letters 106, 103109 (2015). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep30791-s1.doc (8.4MB, doc)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES