Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2004 Aug;42(8):3665–3669. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3665-3669.2004

Recommended Test Panel for Differentiation of Klebsiella Species on the Basis of a Trilateral Interlaboratory Evaluation of 18 Biochemical Tests

Dennis S Hansen 1,*, Hazel M Aucken 2, Titi Abiola 2, Rainer Podschun 3
PMCID: PMC497635  PMID: 15297514

Abstract

Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella oxytoca are the two most frequently encountered Klebsiella species giving rise to infections in humans, but other Klebsiella species can also be found in clinical specimens: Klebsiella ozaenae, Klebsiella rhinoscleromatis, Klebsiella terrigena, Klebsiella planticola, Klebsiella ornithinolytica, and Enterobacter aerogenes (Klebsiella mobilis). However, many of these species are indistinguishable by the conventional methods employed routinely in the clinical microbiological laboratory. Several investigators have suggested various additional tests, but as yet there is no standardized test panel for identifying all Klebsiella species and subspecies. In the present study, performed in three national Klebsiella reference laboratories, we have evaluated a test panel consisting of 18 biochemical tests on 242 strains comprising all Klebsiella species and subspecies. The test panel was designed to identify organisms preliminarily identified as belonging to the genus Klebsiella on the basis of conventional methods or automated identification systems. With the described test panel it is possible to find one or more positive test results differentiating any Klebsiella species, except Klebsiella rhinoscleromatis, from its closest relative.


Klebsiella is among the five gram-negative pathogens most commonly encountered in hospital-acquired infections (11), and Klebsiella pneumoniae is the most frequently occurring species, accounting for 75 to 86% of Klebsiella species reported (3, 10, 29). Much more rarely encountered are Klebsiella ozaenae and Klebsiella rhinoscleromatis, which have been retained as separate species because of their association with specific diseases (24). Taxonomically, these two species are regarded as subspecies of K. pneumoniae based on DNA-DNA hybridization data (20). Klebsiella oxytoca is the other well-established species, accounting for 13 to 25% of isolates (3, 10, 29).

The early 1980s saw the classification of environmental Klebsiella strains into provisional taxa (groups J, K, L, and M) (8) from which three new species have emerged: Klebsiella terrigena (12), Klebsiella planticola (1), and Klebsiella ornithinolytica (26). It has recently been proposed that these last three species be transferred to the new genus Raoultella (4), but as this classification has been controversial (2), we have chosen to use the older nomenclature in this report. The pathogenicity of these species for humans has been considered negligible, as they mainly have been isolated from environmental habitats. Recent studies, however, demonstrated that these new species can also be isolated from clinical specimens (14, 18, 21-23). K. planticola, in particular, has often been found, accounting for up to 18% of all clinical Klebsiella isolates in some studies (18, 21, 23), although this does not appear to be the case in the United States (30). Finally, the species Enterobacter aerogenes is often regarded as an eighth member of the genus Klebsiella (Klebsiella mobilis) (20).

By the conventional methods used routinely in the microbiological laboratory, the new species are largely indistinguishable from K. pneumoniae and K. oxytoca. Several authors have suggested additional tests (1, 12, 16, 26), but as yet there is no standardized test panel for identifying all Klebsiella species and subspecies.

The present paper describes such a test panel and its evaluation by three national Klebsiella reference laboratories from different European countries (Denmark, Germany, and the United Kingdom). The test panel was designed to identify organisms preliminarily identified as belonging to the genus Klebsiella on the basis of conventional identification methods and consisted of 14 tests reported in the literature as discriminatory for Klebsiella spp. (1, 6, 12, 16, 17, 20, 26, 28), supplemented with the fermentation of four carbohydrates that showed promising results in preliminary experiments (9). For validation, the eight known Klebsiella species and subspecies were used, together with Pantoea agglomerans, as this species in our experience is often confused with the less reactive Klebsiella species. As three laboratories participated in this validation, an interlaboratory comparison of the variability of the test results was also possible.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Laboratories.

Participants in this study were the National Reference Laboratory for Klebsiella Species, Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Kiel, Germany (NRL); the Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale, London, England (CPHL); and The International Escherichia and Klebsiella Reference Centre (World Health Organization), Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark (SSI). All three laboratories have in practice national and international reference functions and have cooperated since 1995 in a trilateral quality assurance program on K typing.

Strains.

A total of 242 strains were included in the study: K. pneumoniae (n = 28), K. ozaenae (n = 27), K. rhinoscleromatis (n = 10), K. oxytoca (n = 30), K. terrigena (n = 29), K. planticola (n = 31), K. ornithinolytica (n = 27), E. aerogenes (n = 30), and P. agglomerans (n = 30). Strains were supplied by all three laboratories and were predominantly of clinical origin (blood, urine, sputum, and fecal). The P. agglomerans strains were from a previously published study (13). Much care was taken to include only validated strains of each species. This was done either by extensive biochemical characterization by the providing laboratory or by including strains from official culture collections or from published studies with well-characterized strains. The type strains for all nine species and subspecies examined were also included: ATCC 13883 (K. pneumoniae), NCTC 5050 (K. ozaenae), ATCC 13844 (K. rhinoscleromatis), ATCC 13182 (K. oxytoca), ATCC 33257 (K. terrigena), ATCC 33531 (K. planticola), JCM 6096 (K. ornithinolytica), NCTC 10006 (E. aerogenes), and NCTC 9381 (P. agglomerans).

Biochemical methods.

The methods used by each of the three laboratories for the 18 biochemical tests used in this study are shown in Table 1. In order to provide the most realistic estimate of test variability, each laboratory deliberately continued to use its standard method for each test, since complete standardization of biochemical methods is uncommon and, indeed, many reports do not provide sufficient detail to do so. Incubation periods for the various tests are shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Biochemical tests and methods used by the three participating laboratoriesa

Biochemical test Protocol (exceptions)
CPHL NRL SSI
Lysine decarboxylase Micro Macro Macro (6 days)
Ornithine decarboxylase Micro Macro Macro (6 days)
Indole Micro MacroA Macro (1-2 days)
Methyl red Micro MacroA (1 and 5 days) Macro (1-2 days)
Voges-Proskauer Micro MacroA Macro (1-2 days)
Growth at 10°C Plate (2 days) MacroA (5 days) Macro (3 days)
Gas from lactose, 44.5°C Macro Macro Macro (+ bileb)
Malonate Micro Macro Macro (14 days)
Fermentation of:
    d-Arabinose Micro Micro (1-2 days) Macro (14 days)
    β-Gentiobiose Micro Micro (1-2 days) Micro (2 days)
    d-Melizitose Micro Macro (1-2 days) Macro (14 days)
    2-Deoxy-d-ribose Micro Micro (1-2 days) Micro (2 days)
    l-Sorbose Micro Macro (1-2 days) Macro (14 days)
    d-Tagatose Micro Micro (1-2 days) Micro (2 days)
Utilization of:
    m-Hydroxy-benzoate Plate (2 days) Plate (1 + 3 days, 20-25°C) Macro (3 days, 30°C)
    Histamine Plate (2 days) Plate (1 + 3 days, 20-25°C) Macro (3 days, 30°C)
    Hydroxy-l-proline Plate (2 days) Plate (1 + 3 days, 20-25°C) Macro (3 days, 30°C)
Degradation of pectate Plate (2 days) Plate (1-2 days) Plate (3 days)
a

Test were incubated at 35 to 37°C overnight (18 to 24 h), with exceptions noted in parentheses. Micro, in-house test in microwells; Macro, test in 3 to 10 ml of liquid media; MacroA, test in 3 to 5 ml of solid media; Plate, test on agar plate.

b

Incubated for 18 h.

The following eight conventional biochemical tests were done according to well-established methods as described by Edwards and Ewing (5): lysine (LDC) and ornithine decarboxylation (ODC), indole, methyl red (MR), Voges-Proskauer (VP), malonate, and fermentation of d-melizitose and l-sorbose. At CPHL these tests were done with the same media composition but with an in-house microtray format (100 μl).

Fermentation of four additional carbohydrates, d-arabinose (Sigma A6085 at CPHL and Merck 4592 at NRL), β-gentiobiose (Sigma G3000 at CPHL, SSI, and NRL), 2-deoxy-d-ribose (Sigma D2751 at CPHL, NRL, and SSI), and d-tagatose (Sigma T2751 at CPHL, NRL, and SSI), were adapted to established microwell in-house tests in each of the three laboratories, with the one exception that d-arabinose (Merck 1494) fermentation at SSI was performed in a (macro) test tube.

At SSI the basal medium consisted of 10.0 g of peptone, 5.0 g of meat extract, 3.0 g of NaCl, 2.0 g of Na2HPO4 · 12H2O, 0.024 g of bromthymol blue, and distilled water up to 1,000 ml. At CPHL the basal medium consisted of 4.0 g of peptone 140, 10.0 g of NaCl, 0.6 g of K2HPO4, 0.32 g of bromthymol blue, 0.32 g of thymol blue, and distilled water up to 1,800 ml. At NRL the basal medium consisted of 25.0 g of nutrient broth powder (No. 2, Oxoid CM0067), 0.024 g of bromthymol blue, and distilled water up to 1,000 ml. The percentages of carbohydrate used and reaction volumes were 0.75% and 15 μl, 1.0% and 100 μl, and 1.0% and 100 μl for SSI, CPHL, and NRL, respectively. The tests were incubated at 37°C and read after 1 (CPHL) or 2 days (NRL and SSI).

At SSI growth at 10°C was tested according to the method of Naemura & Seidler (19) by inoculating a nutrient broth with a 10-μl loop from an overnight lactose broth. The CPHL incubated a nutrient agar plate for 48 h and 5 days after inoculation from an overnight nutrient broth. NRL performed this test on nutrient agar slants. After the application of a large inoculum by an inoculation needle, the tubes were incubated up to 5 days.

The fecal-coliform test, measuring the production of gas from lactose at 44.5°C, was performed at SSI in a bile-lactose broth as described elsewhere, with an incubation time of 18 h (25). At NRL, a lactose broth (Merck 1.10689.0500) was incubated for 24 h, and at CPHL a lactose broth was incubated overnight.

Utilization of histamine, hydroxy-l-proline, and m-hydroxy-benzoate were examined at NRL and CPHL on agar plates containing 0.4% of the respective substrate as a sole carbon source and 50 mg of ferric citrate per 1,000 ml. The basal agar medium consisted of 4.0 g of KH2PO4, 1.0 g MgSO4 · 7H2O, 5.0 g of (NH4)2SO4, and 20.0 g of agar per 1,000 ml, as described by Lütticken et al. (15). The following substrates were used: m-hydroxybenzoic acid (Sigma H6761,), trans-hydroxy-l-proline (CPHL, Sigma H6002; NRL, Merck 7434), and histamine (Sigma H7250). After overnight incubation at 37°C, plates were further incubated for 72 h at room temperature, as this enhances the response of the environmental species such as K. terrigena and K. planticola. At SSI, these tests were performed as a macrotube modification (quadruple volume) of the method of Monnet et al., which allowed reading of the test by a densitometer (16). Histamine (Sigma H7250), hydroxy-l-proline (Merck 104506), and m-hydroxy-benzoate (Sigma H 6761) were used in carbon concentrations of 0.14, 0.2, and 0.1%, respectively. The tests were incubated at 30°C for 3 days.

In all three laboratories the degradation of pectate was performed as described by Starr et al., with the modification that 2.0 g of pectate and 1.0 g of agar were used instead of 3.0 g of pectate (27). The strains were spotted or streaked onto the pectate-agar plates and incubated at 37°C for 3 days.

RESULTS

The percentages of strains positive for each test and species combination are given in Tables 2 and 3 for each of the three laboratories. The numbers of tests in which all three centers found all strains of a species to be negative or positive varied from 4 for K. ozaenae and 5 for K. pneumoniae to 10 for K. ornithinolytica. Conversely, the number of tests for which the mean of each triplet of results was between 11 and 89% (i.e., a variable result) ranged from two for K. planticola to six for K. pneumoniae, suggesting that for this panel of tests, K. pneumoniae is the least tightly defined species.

TABLE 2.

Percentages of positive samples of five Klebsiella species by laboratory and testa

Biochemical test K. pneumoniae (n = 28)
K. ozaenae (n = 27)
K. rhinoscleromatis (n = 10)
K. oxytoca (n = 30)
K. terrigena (n = 29)
CPHL NRL SSI CPHL NRL SSI CPHL NRL SSI CPHL NRL SSI CPHL NRL SSI
Lysine decarboxylase 89.3 85.7 96.4 25.9 29.6 25.9 0.0 0.0 10.0 100.0 96.7 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Ornithine decarboxylase 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Indole 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 90.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Methyl red 10.7 3.6 10.7 85.2m 92.6 63.0 90.0m 30.0 90.0 40.0m 0.0 63.3 27.6m 62.1 96.6
Voges-Proskauer 96.4 96.4 96.4 3.7 3.7 7.4 0.0 0.0 10.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 86.2 89.7 100.0
Growth at 10°C 57.1m 0.0 0.0 14.8m 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 93.3 93.3 86.7 100.0 100.0 100.0
Gas from lactose 44.5°C 89.3 89.3 89.3 11.1 11.1 3.7 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 6.7 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Malonate 89.3 100.0 96.4 11.1 7.4 3.7 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 93.3 96.7 96.6 93.1 93.1
Fermentation of:
    d-Arabinose 0.0m 57.1 60.7 0.0m 22.2 29.6 0.0m 10.0 20.0 86.7m 96.7 100.0 0.0 0.0 3.4
    β-Gentiobiose 100.0m 75.0 100.0 70.4m 66.7 100.0 10.0m 50.0 10.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
    d-Melizitose 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 73.3 66.7 70.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
    2-Deoxy-d-ribose 7.1 3.6 10.7 0.0m 11.1 7.4 0.0m 0.0 60.0 0.0m 0.0 16.7 96.6 96.6 96.6
    l-Sorbose 64.3 57.1 75.0 44.4 55.6 44.4 0.0m 20.0 30.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 89.7 89.7 93.1
    d-Tagatose 42.9 28.6 42.9 0.0m 25.9 0.0 10.0 20.0 20.0 90.0 86.7 90.0 17.2 13.8 13.8
Utilization of:
    m-Hydroxy-benzoate 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.4 0.0 0.0 10.0 100.0 96.7 100.0 41.4 65.5 82.8
    Histamine 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 96.6 100.0 96.6
    Hydroxy-l-proline 35.7 21.4 0.0 0.0 7.4 0.0m 0.0 20.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 10.3 41.4 37.9
Degradation of pectate 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 96.7 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
a

Tests showing ≤80% agreement between laboratories are considered to be method (m) dependent, as indicated.

TABLE 3.

Percentages of positive samples of four additional Klebsiella species by laboratory and testa

Biochemical test K. planticola (n = 31)
K. ornithinolytica (n = 27)
E. aerogenes (n = 30)
P. agglomerans (n = 30)
CPHL NRL SSI CPHL NRL SSI CPHL NRL SSI CPHL NRL SSI
Lysine decarboxylase 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 96.7 96.7 96.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ornithine decarboxylase 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 3.3 0.0 0.0
Indole 71.0 74.2 74.2 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0
Methyl red 93.5 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 36.7m 46.7 90.0
Voges-Proskauer 90.3 90.3 100.0 74.1 88.9 88.9 100.0 100.0 100.0 90.0 83.3 90.0
Growth at 10°C 100.0 100.0 96.8 100.0 92.6 96.3 40.0 53.3 33.3 83.3 100.0 93.3
Gas from lactose 44.5°C 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Malonate 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 93.3 96.7 100.0 100.0 96.7
Fermentation of:
    d-Arabinose 0.0m 0.0 35.5 3.7m 44.4 63.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
    β-Gentiobiose 96.8 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 86.7 100.0 13.3m 6.7 70.0
    d-Melizitose 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    2-Deoxy-d-ribose 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 96.3 100.0 0.0m 3.3 20.0 90.0 86.7 96.7
    l-Sorbose 100.0 100.0 100.0 92.6 96.3 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    d-Tagatose 3.2 3.2 3.2 7.4m 25.9 14.8 20.0 16.7 10.0 0.0 6.7 0.0
Utilization of:
    m-Hydroxy-benzoate 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 83.3 80.0 86.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
    Histamine 93.5 93.5 96.8 85.2 88.9 92.6 90.0 83.3 86.7 0.0 3.3 0.0
    Hydroxy-l-proline 100.0 100.0 96.8 85.2 85.2 92.6 86.7 83.3 90.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Degradation of pectate 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
a

Tests showing ≤80% agreement between laboratories were considered to be method (m) dependent, as indicated.

To have a more simple and usable Klebsiella speciation table, Table 4 was created by converting the percentage of positive results from one laboratory (SSI) into a set of symbols as used in the ASM Manual of Clinical Microbiology (7). Since the methods and test formats used in one of the two other laboratories (CPHL or NRL) may be more in agreement with methods implemented in other laboratories, reference values are provided in Tables 2 and 3.

TABLE 4.

Differentiation of Klebsiella species according to the methods described for SSIa

Biochemical test Result for species
K. pneumoniae K. ozaenae K. rhinoscleromatis K. oxytoca K. terrigena K. planticola K. ornithinolytica E. aerogenes P. agglomerans
Lysine decarboxylase + d + + + + +
Ornithine decarboxylase + +
Indole + d +
Methyl red d d + d + + + +
Voges-Proskauer + + + + d + +
Growth at 10°C d + + + d +
Gas from lactose at 44.5°C d
Malonate + + + + + + + +
Fermentation of:
    d-Arabinose d d d + d d
    β-Gentiobiose + + + + + + + d
    d-Melizitose d +
    2-Deoxy-d-ribose d d d + + + d +
    l-Sorbose d d d + + + +
    d-Tagatose d d + d d
Utilization of:
    m-Hydroxy-benzoate + d d
    Histamine + + + d
    Hydroxy-l-proline d d d + + +
Degradation of pectate +
a

Reference values for the other methods and test formats are given in Tables 2 and 3. −, 0 to 10% positive; d, 11 to 89% positive; +, 90 to 100% positive.

The percentages of agreement between each pair of laboratories, by test and species, was calculated, and results showing ≤80% agreement are indicated in Tables 2 and 3. This occurred for only 25 of the 162 test and species combinations as follows: d-arabinose accounted for six, MR for five, β-gentiobiose and 2-deoxy-d-ribose for four combinations each; growth at 10°C, l-sorbose, d-tagatose, and hydroxy-l-proline accounted for one or two each. Thus, these are the tests with poor reproducibility, which may well be the most method dependent.

DISCUSSION

In the present study, we have evaluated a test panel comprising 18 biochemical tests on 242 strains comprising all Klebsiella species and subspecies in three national Klebsiella reference laboratories. Detailed results are provided in Tables 2 and 3 to allow the reader to choose between methods and test formats and still find relevant reference values.

Variable results were of two types: (i) those in which all three laboratories found a mixture of positive and negative results among the representatives of a species for a specific test (e.g., K. pneumoniae and l-sorbose), suggesting a truly variable reaction, and (ii) those in which one center found most strains to be negative while another found most positive (e.g., K. rhinoscleromatis and MR) or vice versa, suggesting that the results were method dependent. These method-dependent tests demonstrate that meticulous standardization is needed before results can be compared between laboratories and that without this standardization each laboratory must use method-adjusted reference values.

In the ASM Manual of Clinical Microbiology, only 6 of the 18 biochemical tests used in the present investigation are listed for Klebsiella species: indole, MR, VP, LDC, ODC, and malonate (7). The percentages of positive reactions for these six tests are within the range shown in Tables 2 and 3, except that in the present study ODC was negative for all strains of K. ozaenae and K. terrigena in all three laboratories, instead of being 3 and 20% positive, respectively.

Of the 18 biochemical tests used in this study, the following 13 tests are listed for Klebsiella species by Ørskov in Bergey's Manual, Tables 5.16 and 5.17 (20): LDC, ODC, indole, MR, VP, growth at 10°C, gas from lactose at 44.5°C, malonate, d-melizitose, l-sorbose, m-hydroxy-benzoate, hydroxy-l-proline, and pectate. The percentages of positive reactions for these 13 tests are within the ranges indicated in Tables 2 and 3, with the one exception that we find fewer (0 to 6.7%) K. oxytoca-positive isolates in hydroxy-l-proline than indicated in Table 5.16 (26 to 75%) of Bergey's Manual.

Several tests were identified that facilitated the differentiation of P. agglomerans strains from the less reactive Klebsiella species (K. ozaenae and K. rhinoscleromatis), namely, LDC, VP, malonate, growth at 10°C, and 2-deoxy-d-ribose fermentation.

In conclusion, based on our experience with this test panel, we suggest Table 4 as a scheme for identifying species within the Klebsiella genus. With the exception of the most biochemically inactive (sub-) species K. rhinoscleromatis, the suggested scheme makes it possible to find one or more positive test results differentiating any species from its closest relative. If the number of tests has to be reduced, MR, d-arabinose, d-tagatose, and d-sorbose could be omitted, as they are either method dependent or less discriminating than the remaining tests.

Acknowledgments

We thank the following persons and institutions for kindly supplying strains: Barry Holmes, CPHL; Wilhelm Frederiksen, SSI; Dominique Monnet, SSI; Merete Weicher, SSI; and Poul Kjældgaard, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Sønderborg Sygehus, Denmark. We thank Andre Charlett, CPHL, for providing statistical analysis.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bagley, S. T., R. J. Seidler, and D. J. Brenner. 1981. Klebsiella planticola sp. nov.: a new species of Enterobacteriaceae found primarily in nonclinical environments. Curr. Microbiol. 6:105-109. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Boye, K., and D. S. Hansen. 2003. Sequencing of 16S rDNA of Klebsiella: taxonomic relations within the genus and to other Enterobacteriaceae. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 292:495-503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.De La Torre, M. G., J. Romero-Vivas, J. Martínez-Bentrán, A. Guerrero, M. Meseguer, and E. Bouza. 1985. Klebsiella bacteremia: an analysis of 100 episodes. Rev. Infect. Dis. 7:143-150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Drancourt, M., C. Bollet, A. Carta, and P. Rousselier. 2001. Phylogenetic analyses of Klebsiella species delineate Klebsiella and Raoultella gen. nov., with description of Raoultella ornithinolytica comb. nov., Raoultella terrigena comb. nov and Raoultella planticola comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol Microbiol. 51:925-932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ewing, W. H. 1986. Edwards and Ewing's identification of Enterobacteriaceae, 4th ed. Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., New York, N.Y.
  • 6.Farmer III, J. J., B. R. Davis, F. W. Hickman-Brenner, A. McWhorter, G. P. Huntley-Carter, M. A. Asbury, C. Riddle, H. G. Wathen-Grady, C. Elias, G. R. Fanning, A. G. Steigerwalt, C. M. O'Hara, G. K. Morris, P. B. Smith, and D. J. Brenner. 1985. Biochemical identification of new species and biotypes of Enterobacteriaceae isolated from clinical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 21:46-76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Farmer III, J. J. 1999. Enterobacteriaceae: introduction and identification, p. 442-458. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 7th ed. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
  • 8.Gavini, F., H. Leclerc, B. Lefebvre, C. Ferragut, and D. Izard. 1977. Taxonomic study of enterobacteria belonging or related to the genus Klebsiella. Ann. Microbiol. 128B:45-59. (In French.) [PubMed]
  • 9.Hansen, D. S. 1997. A clinical and bacteriological characterization of Klebsiella bacteraemia. Ph.D. thesis. Copenhagen University, Denmark. (In Danish.)
  • 10.Hansen, D. S., A. Gottschau, and H. J. Kolmos. 1998. Epidemiology of Klebsiella bacteraemia: a case control study using Escherichia coli bacteraemia as control. J. Hosp. Infect. 38:119-132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Horan, T., D. Culver, W. Jarvis, G. Emori, S. Banerjee, W. Martone, and C. Thornsberry. 1988. Pathogens causing nosocomial infections. Antimicrob. Newslett. 5:65-67. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Izard, D., C. Ferragut, F. Gavini, K. Kersters, J. De Ley, and H. Leclerc. 1981. Klebsiella terrigena, a new species from soil and water. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 31:116-127. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lindh, E., P. Kjaeldgaard, W. Frederiksen, and J. Ursing. 1991. Phenotypical properties of Enterobacter agglomerans (Pantoea agglomerans) from human, animal and plant sources. APMIS 99:347-352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liu, Y., B. J. Mee., and L. Mulgrave. 1997. Identification of clinical isolates of indole-positive Klebsiella spp., including Klebsiella planticola, and a genetic and molecular analysis of their beta-lactamases. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2365-2369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lütticken, R., H. Korth, and G. Pulverer. 1979. Zur differentiazerung von Klebsiella pneumoniae variatio “oxytoca.” Zentbl. Bakteriol. Orig. A 244:470-473. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Monnet, D., and J. Freney. 1994. Method for differentiating Klebsiella planticola and Klebsiella terrigena from other Klebsiella species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:1121-1122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Monnet, D., J. Freney, Y. Brun, J.-M. Boeufgras, and J. Fleurette. 1991. Difficulties in identifying Klebsiella strains of clinical origin. Zentbl. Bakteriol. 274:456-464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mori, M., M. Ohta, N. Agata, N. Kido, Y. Arakawa, H. Ito, T. Komatsu, and N. Kato. 1989. Identification of species and capsular types of Klebsiella clinical isolates, with special reference to Klebsiella planticola. Microbiol. Immunol. 33:887-895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Naemura, L. G., and R. J. Seidler. 1978. Significance of low-temperature growth associated with the fecal coliform response, indole production, and pectin liquefaction in Klebsiella. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 35:392-396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ørskov, I. 1984. Genus v. Klebsiella, p. 461-465. In N. R. Krieg and J. G. Holt (ed.), Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology, vol. 1. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Md.
  • 21.Podschun, R., H. Acktun, J. Okpara, O. Linderkamp, U. Ullmann, and M. Borneff-Lipp. 1998. Isolation of Klebsiella planticola from newborns in a neonatal ward. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2331-2332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Podschun, R., and U. Ullmann. 1992. Isolation of Klebsiella terrigena from clinical specimens. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 11:349-352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Podschun, R., and U. Ullmann. 1994. Incidence of Klebsiella planticola among clinical Klebsiella isolates. Med. Microbiol. Lett. 3:90-95. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Podschun, R., and U. Ullmann. 1998. Klebsiella spp. as nosocomial pathogens: epidemiology, taxonomy, typing methods, and pathogenicity factors. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 11:589-603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rand, M. C., A. E. Greenberg, and M. J. Taras. (ed.) 1975. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 14th ed., p. 922. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
  • 26.Sakazaki, R., K. Tamura, Y. Kosako, and E. Yoshizaki. 1989. Klebsiella ornithinolytica sp. nov., formerly known as ornithine-positive Klebsiella oxytoca. Curr. Microbiol. 18:201-206. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Starr, M. P., A. K. Chatterjee, P. B. Starr, and G. E. Buchanan. 1977. Enzymatic degradation of polygalacturonic acids by Yersinia and Klebsiella species in relation to clinical laboratory procedures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 6:379-386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stenzel, W., H. Bürger, and W. Mannheim. 1972. Classification and differential diagnosis of the Klebsiella group with special reference to the so-called oxytocum types. Zentbl. Bakteriol. Orig. A 219:193-203. (In German.) [PubMed]
  • 29.Watanakunakorn, C. 1991. Klebsiella bacteremia: a review of 196 episodes during a decade (1980-1989). Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 23:399-405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Westbrook, G. L., C. M. O'Hara, S. B. Roman, and J. M. Miller. 2000. Incidence and identification of Klebsiella planticola in clinical isolates with emphasis on newborns. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1495-1497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES